Think Progress

Why Negroponte Got the Nod

By Brooke Lierman on Feb 17th, 2005 at 2:15 pm

Why Negroponte Got the Nod

This morning President Bush announced his decision to pull America’s lead man in Iraq, John Negroponte, and appoint him to be the new national director of intelligence. Though the White House claimed the delay was just President Bush trying to “get it right,” at least three potential nominees (Robert Gates, Sam Nunn and William Barr) turned the job down. The NDI will be the country’s quarterback on intelligence – coordinating and leading all 15 partners of the intelligence community.

Given that Bush has repeatedly told America that Iraq is the “central front in the war on terror,” and he thinks that Negroponte is serving with “distinction in Iraq,” why is he being pulled at such a critical juncture?

Negroponte’s most notable experience in intelligence is breaking the law in Honduras . Perhaps his strongest qualification to be the NDI is simply that he is confirmable. Though his nomination as ambassador to the United Nations was held up when several senators demanded answers for his actions (or lack thereof) in Honduras, after the attacks on Sept. 11, 2001, there was such a great need to have a consistent voice at the U.N. that Negroponte was able to fast-track through the confirmation process.

He was then confirmed again when Bush nominated him to be ambassador in Iraq, and so it’s expected he will be confirmed to this new role.



5 Responses to “Why Negroponte Got the Nod”

  1. jerry hill says:

    Perhaps Negroponte was selected only because he was “confirmable,” as you suggest. What a coincidence, then, that he’s the ultimate yes-man offered the job everyone else has said “No” to. In short, i believe John Negroponte was chosen because he is pliable and a team player.


  2. bill says:

    i guess that you folks a beating a dead horse. given the list of past liars and pardoned criminals that are running this government, do you think that for one single moment that this admin give a damn about what you folks
    write? we are now a one party system and unless the citizens wake up, we (and you) ain’t seen nuttin yet!
    billjpa@aol.com


  3. Richard says:

    The appointment of Negroponte is the moral equivqlent of the appointment of Reinhard Heydrich to head the Nazi SD (Schiendienst-Security Service). The man belongs in the modern equivalent of Spandau Prison-if not Devil’s Island.


  4. The Ghost says:

    While Negroponte is not my favorite guy, he is a very intelligent diplomat, and yes a team player, and yes a Bush Team Player…..that is not news…the next President will have his team players appointed. The problem here is not with Negroponte its will Thomas Kean, Congressman Lee Hamilton and some of the 911 Families member who suffered from cranial rectal inversion when they came up with this lousy arsine idea in the first place and then allowed the NID to become a political position.

    Dewey Clarridge stop screwing around in California and get with the program……


  5. gomothra says:

    How many people who protested U.S. military
    involvement in Honduras, El Salvador and Nicaragua have been imprisoned in the
    last four years?

    How many now will be tortured “legally” under
    the new law allowing torture of prisoners?

    How many will die or “disappear” in the process?



Jump to Top

About Think Progress | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy (off-site) | RSS | Donate
© 2005-2009 Center for American Progress Action Fund
View Most Popular

Advertisement

What We're About

Featured

image
Subscribe to the Progress Report



imageTopic Cloud


Visit Our Affiliated Sites

image image
Reports


Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.

Name:
Email:
Tip:
(required)


imageArchives


imageBlog Roll