<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Unfairly Balanced</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thinkprogress.org/2005/02/27/unfairly-balanced/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/02/27/unfairly-balanced/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 03:20:58 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tom Haymes</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/02/27/unfairly-balanced/comment-page-1/#comment-2576</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Haymes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2005 22:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=337#comment-2576</guid>
		<description>The media&#039;s motivations are far more complex than the false Left-Right dichotomy proposed here. Judd is correct in his analysis of the Washington Post piece but I would not ascribe it to ideological bias so quickly. It is probably the result of sloppiness and is therefore a quality issue, not a bias issue.

The media are interested in making money and that creates time pressures that often reduce the quality of the reporting and writing. The media is more likely to be sloppy and superficial than ideological. It doesn&#039;t make profit sense otherwise. Why deliberately alienate a portion of your potential customer base if you are in the BROADcast industry?

The reason liberals are currently so upset with the media is that we have an administration that is particularly adept as manipulating the weaknesses of the media. The Bush Administration and their Republican allies recognize that they only have to muddy the water enough so that an issue sneaks past the blinkered radars of the media. Then they can define the issue in their terms. Given the advantages that the Republicans have reaped from this strategy, they have little to complain about. Democrats, on the other hand, have not mastered the art of media manipulation to the same degree.

It&#039;s not a pretty situation and the truth is usually the victim. However, blame the system and its reliance on the profit motive rather than ascribing it to any clear ideological bias (unless, as in the case of FOX, that bias makes money - remember, however, that FOX also shows &quot;The Simpsons&quot; and Rupert Murdoch is Michael Moore&#039;s book publisher).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The media&#8217;s motivations are far more complex than the false Left-Right dichotomy proposed here. Judd is correct in his analysis of the Washington Post piece but I would not ascribe it to ideological bias so quickly. It is probably the result of sloppiness and is therefore a quality issue, not a bias issue.</p>
<p>The media are interested in making money and that creates time pressures that often reduce the quality of the reporting and writing. The media is more likely to be sloppy and superficial than ideological. It doesn&#8217;t make profit sense otherwise. Why deliberately alienate a portion of your potential customer base if you are in the BROADcast industry?</p>
<p>The reason liberals are currently so upset with the media is that we have an administration that is particularly adept as manipulating the weaknesses of the media. The Bush Administration and their Republican allies recognize that they only have to muddy the water enough so that an issue sneaks past the blinkered radars of the media. Then they can define the issue in their terms. Given the advantages that the Republicans have reaped from this strategy, they have little to complain about. Democrats, on the other hand, have not mastered the art of media manipulation to the same degree.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not a pretty situation and the truth is usually the victim. However, blame the system and its reliance on the profit motive rather than ascribing it to any clear ideological bias (unless, as in the case of FOX, that bias makes money &#8211; remember, however, that FOX also shows &#8220;The Simpsons&#8221; and Rupert Murdoch is Michael Moore&#8217;s book publisher).<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=2576', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Hines</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/02/27/unfairly-balanced/comment-page-1/#comment-2570</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Hines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2005 20:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=337#comment-2570</guid>
		<description>The problem with claims of media bias is that humans naturally look for things that confirm or disconfirm preexisting values and beliefs.  When conservatives watch the MSM and see something that challenges those beliefs, they scream liberal bias.  When liberals watch the MSM and see something they don&#039;t like, they scream conservative bias.  If it was even possible for the MSM to be perfectly free of bias, liberals and conservatives would still claim it was biased because it did not conform to their preexisting values.  There in lies the problem of claiming the MSM is on one side or the other.  Apart from FOX, which clearly has a bias towards conservatives, the MSM is not on anyone&#039;s side.  They have biases that go in both directions, thus providing perpetual fresh evidence that the media is biased in one direction or the other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with claims of media bias is that humans naturally look for things that confirm or disconfirm preexisting values and beliefs.  When conservatives watch the MSM and see something that challenges those beliefs, they scream liberal bias.  When liberals watch the MSM and see something they don&#8217;t like, they scream conservative bias.  If it was even possible for the MSM to be perfectly free of bias, liberals and conservatives would still claim it was biased because it did not conform to their preexisting values.  There in lies the problem of claiming the MSM is on one side or the other.  Apart from FOX, which clearly has a bias towards conservatives, the MSM is not on anyone&#8217;s side.  They have biases that go in both directions, thus providing perpetual fresh evidence that the media is biased in one direction or the other.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=2570', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/02/27/unfairly-balanced/comment-page-1/#comment-2559</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2005 18:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=337#comment-2559</guid>
		<description>Vaughn, wake up man!  You cannot honestly watch the mainstream media(ABC, NBC, CBS, PMSNBC, and the COMMIE NEWS NETWORK) and come away with anything other than a sense of total liberal bias!  I could sit here and list hundreds of examples, but I am sure all of you libs know them already.(Rathergate, the Halprin memo, etc.)I am a proud conservative, and if the MSM is on my side then they sure have me fooled!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vaughn, wake up man!  You cannot honestly watch the mainstream media(ABC, NBC, CBS, PMSNBC, and the COMMIE NEWS NETWORK) and come away with anything other than a sense of total liberal bias!  I could sit here and list hundreds of examples, but I am sure all of you libs know them already.(Rathergate, the Halprin memo, etc.)I am a proud conservative, and if the MSM is on my side then they sure have me fooled!<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=2559', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leslie cohen</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/02/27/unfairly-balanced/comment-page-1/#comment-2553</link>
		<dc:creator>leslie cohen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2005 17:44:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=337#comment-2553</guid>
		<description>got the same sense when reading this article.  your presentation only clarified it.  thank you      leslie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>got the same sense when reading this article.  your presentation only clarified it.  thank you      leslie<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=2553', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vaughn Hopkins</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/02/27/unfairly-balanced/comment-page-1/#comment-2552</link>
		<dc:creator>Vaughn Hopkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2005 17:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=337#comment-2552</guid>
		<description>The liberal media just bends over for Democrats all the time.  The liberal media never ever writes a word of criticism of Democratic positions.  The liberal media hates George Bush.    
Now that we have all the lies out of the way can we discuss reality?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The liberal media just bends over for Democrats all the time.  The liberal media never ever writes a word of criticism of Democratic positions.  The liberal media hates George Bush.<br />
Now that we have all the lies out of the way can we discuss reality?<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=2552', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/02/27/unfairly-balanced/comment-page-1/#comment-2550</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2005 17:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=337#comment-2550</guid>
		<description>The Media is the lap dog of the left and all of you libs know it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Media is the lap dog of the left and all of you libs know it!<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=2550', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hedley Lamarr</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/02/27/unfairly-balanced/comment-page-1/#comment-2548</link>
		<dc:creator>Hedley Lamarr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2005 16:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=337#comment-2548</guid>
		<description>Last evening the headline was even more &quot;balanced sounding&quot;; something like &quot;Both sides distort the issues&quot;  After reading the article, I wondered what the editor was thinking; other than never offer one-sided criticism of the administration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last evening the headline was even more &#8220;balanced sounding&#8221;; something like &#8220;Both sides distort the issues&#8221;  After reading the article, I wondered what the editor was thinking; other than never offer one-sided criticism of the administration.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=2548', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
