Comments on: Hyde: Clinton Impeachment Retaliation for Nixon

By: prilosec

prilosec — Mon, 16 Jan 2006 01:29:11 +0000

prilosec…

Eiffel bits?diddle allowance ceramic openly lifetime birth control pills http://birth-control-pills.metasart.com/ …

By: bextra

bextra — Wed, 30 Nov 2005 20:50:03 +0000

http://bextra.ls1fun.com
bextra, bextra side effects, generic bextra, dose of bextra, bextra generic, buy bextra, cheap bextra, bextra diet pills, discount bextra, bextra capital, order bextra

By: obst

obst — Fri, 21 Oct 2005 13:12:19 +0000

obst

You may find it interesting to take a look at the sites on double magic

By: nextel ringtones

nextel ringtones — Thu, 06 Oct 2005 06:25:15 +0000

nextel ringtones

nextel ringtones Nextel ringtones, and then underestimating Calvert a quizzical retirest, under which the young half-suffoc

By: Raymond Kidd

Raymond Kidd — Mon, 18 Jul 2005 00:53:38 +0000

If I didn’t know better, I would swear the man is trying to start a war in our own country.

By: Raymond Kidd

Raymond Kidd — Mon, 18 Jul 2005 00:47:47 +0000

Clinton may have lied! but he sure as heck didn’t kill anyone.

By: David

David — Fri, 22 Apr 2005 21:37:08 +0000

These hate mongers hunted down the Clintons for 8 years and spent 10’s of millions of tax payers dollars and this is all they have to offer as an explaination?

Meanwhile during the process, there were plenty of pictures in circulation of Mr. Hyde’s mistress in the house meeting room waiting for Henry, I would guess.

Mr. Hyde your a hypocrit, may the republican party burn in hell.

By: tom

tom — Fri, 22 Apr 2005 21:14:36 +0000

Oliver North sold weapons to terrorists, our enemies who had sworn to destroy us. He gave anti-tank missiles to Hizbollah.

And now he’s called a patriot. A patriot for what country I would ask.

By: Mark

Mark — Fri, 22 Apr 2005 18:58:16 +0000

First – what’s a “URI” in the Leave a Comment section. I know what a URL is…

Save your outrage about the impeachment of Clinton. What’s truly outrageous – and I’m not the first to point this out – is that a reporter referred to the “impeachment” of Nixon. That a reporter can’t even remember very recent history is truly appalling. Did his opponents chase Nixon’s sorry ass out of office and out of town? Sure! Impeach him? Um, read your history books.

Reporter probably got his info from the Republicants’ daily talking points.

By: GMNotYet

GMNotYet — Fri, 22 Apr 2005 18:25:34 +0000

Reagan should have been impeached for his incompetence/lies about the Iran-Contra scandal. But then again having consensual sex with an intern is a much more serious crime than FUNDING AN ILLEGAL WAR in Central America.

By: Willie Loucks

Willie Loucks — Fri, 22 Apr 2005 18:15:04 +0000

Clinton lied about something he should never had been asked and republians tried to impeach him. Bush has lied from day one in office about the economy, forgien policy, social security, taxes, budget defecient and national debt and he gets reelected. I just can’t understand why

By: Thom

Thom — Fri, 22 Apr 2005 17:47:56 +0000

Just out of curiosity, am I the only who finds this explanation barely comprehensible?

Nixon was guilty of a serious crime–crimes, actually–and had to be pardoned by Ford accordingly.

Clinton misbehaved with an intern, and then attempted within the limits of the law–but not that of commonsense and decency–to deny his sexual misconduct.

(Again, the millions and millions of dollars spent on the Whitewater invesitgation found nothing because there was never anything to find).

In terms of abuse of power or harm to the executive office, what Nixon did and what Clinton aren’t even remotely equivalent.

So we were dragged through all that hateful nonsense, with Congressional gridlock and inaction on everything from terrorism to healthcare to the economy, so that certain Republicans could have their payback?

My God.

By: Jon

Jon — Fri, 22 Apr 2005 16:19:17 +0000

For a brief but disturbing history of how the Right learned to love the nuclear option, see:

“The Conservative Theory of Evolution”