The Guardian reports:
A key Foreign Office diplomat responsible for liaising with UN inspectors says today that claims the government made about Iraq’s weapons programme were “totally implausible”.
He tells the Guardian: “I’d read the intelligence on WMD for four and a half years, and there’s no way that it could sustain the case that the government was presenting. All of my colleagues knew that, too”.
Why does the British media continue to investigate and pursue pre-war intelligence claims with more vigor than the U.S. media?
Maybe because the media here in the states is part of the problem….
June 20th, 2005 at 2:13 pmThe US media has billions of dollars of legislation before Congress that would allow them to make even more money than they already do. Don’t forget, they’re making money off of “public” airwarves. But that’s not the point. The point is, the media wants what it wants (more money) and they need the Emperer’s support. Hence reports favorable to the WhiteHouse.
That’s the simplified version.
June 20th, 2005 at 2:29 pmOK, so this diplomat is named Carne Ross. Is this the same Carne-Ross who is a professor emeritus of classics at Boston University? How can he have been a classics professor and a diplomat at the same time? Captain’s Quarters will be all over this glaring inconsistency.
June 20th, 2005 at 2:33 pmYou Want More? You Get More
June 20th, 2005 at 8:46 pmJust a quick update from The WB42 5:30 Report with Doug Krile. A few random links to raise your blood pressure.
P. O’Neill,
June 21st, 2005 at 3:45 pmAh yes…you and I are on to the Carne Ross forgeries.
ÆðÃû È¡Ãû
July 16th, 2005 at 9:33 pmhttp://www.pufan.com
nike payless shoes
nike payless shoes We are a disease-laden behind perusing, undistinguishing with our heads together, while he, in his rasp
October 7th, 2005 at 2:49 pmgirl porn
Please take a look at the sites on gay bondage squirting orgasm young teens
November 6th, 2005 at 11:36 pm