But according to John Dean just because Rove isn’t guilty of violating the Identities Protection Act doesn’t mean he didn’t commit a crime. Check out this article http://writ.corporate.findlaw.com/dean/20050715.html
I think John Dean should know a thing or two about White House scandals and obstructing justice http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Dean

If this is true, it would explain why they are holding to the confidentiality points on the reporters who haven’t been released… It would not only be devastating to the whitehouse, but it could take down BOTH of the real powers in the whitehouse – rove & cheney, and leave his incompetence to lead by himself (maybe an even scarier situation for the world than the current one?). Sad all of the way around if you ask me.

John ‘I always wear a brownshirt’ Bolton. He was deeply involved in the yellowcake story http://www.tompaine.com/articles/20050511/boltons_yellowcake.php and both he and Cheney had the most egg on their faces (besides Chimpy) when the ‘nukular weapons’ caper collapsed in the wake of Wilson’s op-ed.

Back to you, pinko librul George H. W. Bush. http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/week_2005_07_10.php#006091

Treason in a time of war and now the president refusing to root it out? Does that get over the blowjob bar?

Let’s emphasize at every turn that this thing is NOT about just one man.

GODDAMN IT!

Because there was no “leaker”! There was no “other leaker”!

GODDAMN IT!

The outing of Plame is being framed incorrectly. There wasn’t “a leaker” or “two leakers”, there was a whole damn group of leakers.

The outing of Plame was the result of groupleak.

Every person in the Bush administration who had a hand in the events that lead from the time that Valerie Wilson was diligently working on protecting the US from the threat of WMD to the time when she was not should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law because they are all traitors to our nation.

Now, I know that it sometimes takes time for the media to present things in the clearest manner in which they should be presented so I don’t blame them too much yet for not emphasizing (or hell, even mentioning) the fact that this thing goes much deeper than Rove, but we here in the blogosphere should not be doing only what they are doing.

Let’s emphasize at every turn that this thing is about just one man, it’s about a whole slew of traitorous men and women.

So WE have to keep it up. The truth will out.

Regarding the DSM, what are you all doing on Saturday the 23rd? Find a DSM 3rd anniversary event near you and ATTEND!

He’s guilty. They all are. You better watch what you say.

The Bush administration made plans for war and for Iraq’s oil before the 9/11 attacks, sparking a policy battle between neo-cons and Big Oil, BBC’s Newsnight has revealed.

Two years ago today – when President George Bush announced US, British and Allied forces would begin to bomb Baghdad – protesters claimed the US had a secret plan for Iraq’s oil once Saddam had been conquered. In fact there were two conflicting plans, setting off a hidden policy war between neo-conservatives at the Pentagon, on one side, versus a combination of “Big Oil” executives and US State Department “pragmatists”.

“Big Oil” appears to have won. The latest plan, obtained by Newsnight from the US State Department was, we learned, drafted with the help of American oil industry consultants. Insiders told Newsnight that planning began “within weeks” of Bush’s first taking office in 2001, long before the September 11th attack on the US.

An Iraqi-born oil industry consultant, Falah Aljibury, says he took part in the secret meetings in California, Washington and the Middle East. He described a State Department plan for a forced coup d’etat. Mr Aljibury himself told Newsnight that he interviewed potential successors to Saddam Hussein on behalf of the Bush administration.

Add the letter to Clinton in 99.

Add the DSM

Add the outing of Plame

votetoimpeach.org

Cheney has CEO mentality. CEOs only dial other CEOs. They have staff to do the rest.

The question is, did he pick a staff person that would be willing to give up Cheney for a lesser sentence?

Truth is, I doubt Cheney called or asked somebody to call. What I could believe is a situation where his desires are understood and all he knows is that a staffer was “working on the Niger situation”.

Other than that, invisible as usual.

Is he in the hospital again? Or is he one of the culprits in question?

I have no doubt that the outing was part of the intelligence fixing and the entire Bushie Administration was in on it.

But, it is peculiar that Cheney is nowhere to be found at this time.

We are in a very wonderful place right now.
Patrick Fitzgerald will take down Rove and Ramsey Clark will take down the rest.

Life is good.