Comments on: Et Tu, Ari?

By: lunarpages

lunarpages — Mon, 03 Apr 2006 09:22:36 +0000

Good afternoon. I am not sure if this is the right place to be posting this, but I couldnt find the contact info for the blog woner. If you need any extra webhosting or webhosting information then feel free to try lunarpages I amconvinced that lunarpages is the best web hosting option for your blog and you should save yourself some cash because web hosting can be pretty expensive these days.

lunarpages

By: 907

907 — Sat, 05 Nov 2005 19:54:00 +0000

907

Take your time to take a look at some relevant information dedicated to 119

By: robert polhemus

robert polhemus — Mon, 25 Jul 2005 00:39:35 +0000

Seems like a whole lot of Important People including Senators are frightened out of their wits over something surrounding this Wilson Plame situation.
Does not matter though. The exact specifics about how this country is; and has been run by a select group of people to powerful that even Presidents and Top elected officials will die for them cna never be allowed exposure to the light of day. Mark my word, people are going to begin dying from this episode.

By: Jean B. Stowe

Jean B. Stowe — Sat, 23 Jul 2005 22:34:47 +0000

I just luv u guys….i can say that, I’m old enough..lots of info, so little time. Ya’ll gotta find out soon tho how to set fires under Dems butts. What’s wrong with them? Just can’t figure it out. I hope it’s all the Repugs – you know Rove, Cheney, Bush, Condi. What would JFK, Martin Luther King, all the seemingly caring ones say about all this crap? We can talk til the cows come home, but there’s gotta be something lucrative lurking around the corners that has answers to the nightmare… “Ask and it shall be given you, seek and ye shall find”… in PEACE, Senior Dem

By: DemPlans.com

DemPlans.com — Sat, 23 Jul 2005 05:02:23 +0000

Criminal in the White House?
What a bold comment by Bush… If anyone commits a crime, they can’t work in the White House.

Gee, if they commit a crime, aren’t they supposed to go to the “Big House”? It’d be hard to be Deputy Chief of Staff to the President from a Federal Penitentiary…

Unless George is saying that Rove would be pardoned…

After all, his exact quote is that they “would be taken care of”…that’s got a peculiar double meaning. I haven’t heard anyone else parse that phrase.

In fact, that might be an argument for the White House to have Rove convicted sooner than later, so he can be pardoned in time to run Jeb’s 2008 Presidential campaign. If he’s convicted too late, a Democrat could be President and goodbye Get Out Of Jail Free card…

By: Brendan O'Maidian

Brendan O'Maidian — Sat, 23 Jul 2005 03:21:39 +0000

Remember, it was Ari who held up a sign telling our disaster-in-chief, “Don’t say anything yet,” as dumya was reading a pet goat story to a classroom full of children…and, as people were jumping from the WTC.
Who told Ari to write that message? It wasn’t his boss, unless Rove (who was there, too) is, in fact, the real boss.
We’re discussing a cadre of traitors here, if there ever was one. You can believe it is Rove who is telling the “president” how to handle this Plame affair, and it does not include any discussions about Rove resigning or being fired.
This is a fat chance for the Democrats to take out these un-Americans, but I’m afraid the dems won’t know what to do, unless of course, they ask Howard Dean. He seems to be the only one who has the balls to take it to the traitors’ court.
BB

By: the truth

the truth — Sat, 23 Jul 2005 00:54:43 +0000

no wonder he resigned when he did, right after NoFact’s column came out.

By: babydeebie

babydeebie — Sat, 23 Jul 2005 00:00:58 +0000

Maybe Ari quit because he got tired of Dubya’s rubbing his (Ari’s) bald head.

By: moeman

moeman — Fri, 22 Jul 2005 22:34:08 +0000

Justice is blind.

By: Bubba Ram Dos

Bubba Ram Dos — Fri, 22 Jul 2005 22:27:11 +0000

Oh, Magoo…you’ve done it again…

By: rob

rob — Fri, 22 Jul 2005 21:49:46 +0000

I love how “peruse” actually means “read carefully” but most people think it means “glance over.”

By: The Tattered Coat » Blog Archive » Friday Linkfest

The Tattered Coat » Blog Archive » Friday Linkfest — Fri, 22 Jul 2005 19:57:49 +0000

[...] As Think Progress points out, Ari Fleischer may be facing additional scrutiny (via Eschaton). [...]

By: The WB42 5:30 Report With Doug Krile

The WB42 5:30 Report With Doug Krile — Fri, 22 Jul 2005 19:32:06 +0000

TGIF at the 5:30 Report

It’s time to wrap it up for another week! Quotes, links and comments from The 5:30 Report with Doug Krile on KWBF, WB42, in Little Rock, AR.

By: Jaimie

Jaimie — Fri, 22 Jul 2005 19:30:12 +0000

Didn’t Ari Fleischer quit rather abruptly right after the Plame/Rove scheme began to be exposed. Maybe he was involved at some level and wanted to distance himself from the nest of vipers so that at least when the indictments came down, he wouldn’t still be working with them and lying up on the podium.
If you go to the whitehouse’s press briefing archives, I believe Puffy McMoonface starts around July 14 or 15, 2003.

By: Wm. J. McGowan, II

Wm. J. McGowan, II — Fri, 22 Jul 2005 19:24:05 +0000

I hate to say it of all of you are really wrong in who truly is to blame in the Republican’s eye’s, they just are not saying it yet openly where it could be examined. It’s our former President Clinton.

By: steve duncan

steve duncan — Fri, 22 Jul 2005 19:22:59 +0000

It would seem plausible deniability would allow Ari to deny reading one particular document. They’re all 8-1/2 x 11 pieces of paper after all. Unless there is some sort of chain of possession sign-off log how can anyone swear beyond all doubt the doc they saw someone reading was precisely the object of contention? Wouldn’t it boil down to a “he said-she said” scenario?

By: pahoo

pahoo — Fri, 22 Jul 2005 19:15:49 +0000

Ã¢â‚¬Å“What difference does it make WHO sent him?Ã¢â‚¬?

That’s what I say. Or more to the point, if the administration didn’t send him or someone else – WHY DIDN’T THEY?

Did they not want to know if the story was true or did they ALREADY know?

We know the answer to that, don’t we?

By: Cal Gal

Cal Gal — Fri, 22 Jul 2005 18:51:52 +0000

That RNC Talking Point about Wilson “saying” or “implying” that Cheney sent him has certainly sunk into some dense MSM heads. Al Franken has a couple of times pinpointed its fallacy. It apparently depends on an misleadingly edited transcript of a Wolf Blitzer interview with Wilson. (Or should I say “heavily redacted” interview.) Wilson, of course, has always maintained that the CIA sent him after Cheney’s Office pressed them for more intelligence on this issue.

Of course, as my husband always says, “What difference does it make WHO sent him?” What matters IS what he found, and what he told his CIA debriefers. Of course, what Rove, Libby, Hughes et al. were concerned about was not what Wilson found out in the spring of 2002, but what Cheney can be shown to have known when he made his famous “reconstituted programs” (Just Add Water!) statements, over and over, in the fall of 2002. They of course were most concerned about the 2004 elections and keeping the public in the dark about the situation leading up to the Iraq war: “that the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy.”

Good for Imus for saying, “what did he say” but a few minus points for not following up in detail and pointing out (like Franken does) the disassembling of the RNC Talking Points.

By: media in trouble

media in trouble — Fri, 22 Jul 2005 18:50:49 +0000

You have it all wrong!

It is all about who you HEARD it from not where you READ it from.

Follow the Yellow Brick Road says the Deep Throat of the 21st century!

By: Jim

Jim — Fri, 22 Jul 2005 18:27:18 +0000

Come on people! Ari was NOT reading the memo. He was simply using it to cover his “Hustlers’s Lesbians of the Midwest Edition”, so as not to create an “akward” feeling should Dick look his way.