Think Progress

Rosy Rhetoric Revisited

By Faiz Shakir on Jul 29th, 2005 at 11:28 am

Rosy Rhetoric Revisited

Because it has been more than two years since the original invasion of Iraq, much of the American public has forgotten how easy Bush administration officials predicted the occupation of Iraq would be. The Washington Post reports the hard truth:

Efforts to rebuild water, electricity and health networks in Iraq are being shortchanged by higher-than-expected costs to provide security and by generous financial awards to contractors, according to a series of reports by government investigators released yesterday.

Taken together, the reports seem to run contrary to the Bush administration’s upbeat assessment that reconstruction efforts are moving vigorously ahead and that the insurgency is dying down.

Here are just a couple of instances of the Bush administration’s rosy rhetoric failing to meet the current harsh reality in Iraq:

CLAIM: Iraq Reconstruction Would Cost Only $1.7 Billion

TED KOPPEL: You’re saying the, the top cost for the US taxpayer will be $1.7 billion. No more than that?

ANDREW NATSIOS, director of U.S. Agency for International Development: For the reconstruction. And then there’s 700 million in the supplemental budget for humanitarian relief, which we don’t competitively bid ’cause it’s charities that get that money.

TED KOPPEL: I understand. But as far as reconstruction goes, the American taxpayer will not be hit for more than $1.7 billion no matter how long the process takes?

ANDREW NATSIOS: That is our plan and that is our intention. And these figures, outlandish figures I’ve seen, I have to say, there’s a little bit of hoopla involved in this. [ABC, Nightline, 4/23/03]

FACT: U.S. Has Appropriated $24 Billion For Iraq Reconstruction

“The reconstruction projects in Iraq and Afghanistan together represent the largest U.S. assistance efforts since World War II. In Iraq alone, the GAO said, the United States has allocated $24 billion and has spent $9 billion since 2003.” [Washington Post, 7/29/05]

CLAIM: Iraq Could Finance Own Reconstruction With Oil Money

PAUL WOLFOWITZ: “And on a rough recollection, the oil revenues of that country could bring between $50 and $100 billion over the course of the next two or three years We’re dealing with a country that can really finance its own reconstruction, and relatively soon.”[House Appropriations Committee, 3/27/03]

FACT: Crude Oil Production Has Declined In Past 2 Years

“Crude oil production has also dropped in the past two years, even with more than $5 billion in U.S. and Iraqi funds available for rebuilding. Oil export revenue is needed to fund more than 90 percent of the nascent Iraqi government’s 2005 budget, the State Department has said.” [Washington Post, 7/29/05]

“Restoring and sustaining Iraq’s crude oil production and export capacity have been slower than originally planned, and these levels were lower in May 2005 than in March 2003.” [GAO report, July 2005]



15 Responses to “Rosy Rhetoric Revisited”

  1. portly says:

    umm, i live in Kansas. Wut’s all this “war” talk about? Where’s Eye-Rack?


  2. Darth Filibustrous says:

    Now even the Council for Forign Relations say that U.S. reconstruction failures are “fueling” militants.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4723281.stm

    Any more stating-the-obvious reports out there?


  3. cynical ex-hippie says:

    I live in the midwest and I say we’re perfectly safe now.

    So you liberals in NY, DC, and other major cities can quit yer bellyachin’! You lost the election ha ha ha.


  4. G.S. says:

    They have done little but build new military bases. Had hospitals or schools been rebuilt, we would be seeing them all the time on MSM.


  5. Mikey says:

    Iraq “reconstruction” is yet another method to subsidize oil companies, as if the latest energy bill didn’t rape tax payers enough already.


  6. cynical ex-hippie says:

    Still waiting for those right wing talk radio jocks to go to Iraq and show us how great things are going.


  7. Terrytheturtle says:

    Mikey, you are absolutely right on. I would guess 99% of the money is going straight from the Treasury straight to Halliburton, Custer Battles, Bechtel. I guess some is going offshore – to the various Caribbean tax shelters. The only thing ending up in Iraq are Happy Meals for the troops and DU shells for the locals.


  8. Don says:

    Cynical, they’ve gone and come back

    http://www.buzzpatterson.com/main.asp

    Buzz Is Home From Iraq!
    Buzz and 6 other radio hosts have returned from their week of speaking with troops, broadcasting live, and delivering the message Liberal Media won’t! It was a fantastic opportunity to see our men and women in action; defending us and helping the Iraqi’s with their democracy.

    Thank you to Stafford Hospitality in Tifton, Georgia, The
    Quorum Resort in Tampa, FL and Stiles Travel in Sacramento, CA for your exceptional support!!

    You can see reports and pictures of their historic trip at
    http://www.rightalk.com and http://www.voicesofsoldiers.com. A short video is also available at techlily.com/videocards/danh/Soldiers_Voice.html.

    Cynical, let’s see if you’re still so cynical after seeing and hearing the truth about how our troops are defending us and helping Iraqis with their democracy, after a short message from our sponsor — Halliburton, where looting the treasury isn’t just a figure of speech.


  9. cynical ex-hippie says:

    That put me in my place. They even took pictures of all the places they visited to get the real story: coalition hq, camp victory, and the green zone. No wonder I didn’t hear about it. The MSM doesn’t report all the good things happening within the green zone and other high-security areas.


  10. trblmkr says:

    For more background on what I call “the other intelligence failure” go to my blog. It has all the background on the Bushies’ prewar claims about reconstruction costs and their postwar lies about why they were so far off the mark.

    Just click on my username.

    trblmkr


  11. Marie says:

    Name ONE thing that the Bushies have been right on. One thing that they have done that has benefitted America as a whole. They are failures — all of them — and they are running the country off the road and into the ditch.


  12. Terrytheturtle says:

    Marie, they’ve been right on one thing – lie often enough and consistently enough and you’ll all buy it. Thanks a lot. I used to think Americans were quaint in their ignorance – its not so quaint now. How do we fight these bastards?


  13. KJ Lovell says:

    “if they package it nice and market it right we’ll buy bologna”….. (song from a Strisand movie)

    It seems as if the Iraq people had more reliable utilities and voting rights under the Sadam regime…..

    Hmmmmm……….


  14. site link popularity says:

    site link popularity

    One notable blogging tool that does not support trackback yet is Blogger. Many blogs have stopped using trackbacks because dealing


  15. The American Conservative » Talking Points says:

    [...] do more to pay for our heavy-handed occupation”– similar to the old Bush administration lying point? PAUL WOLFOWITZ: “And on a rough recollection, the oil revenues of that country could bring [...]



Jump to Top

About Think Progress | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy (off-site) | RSS | Donate
© 2005-2009 Center for American Progress Action Fund
View Most Popular

Advertisement

What We're About

Featured

image
Subscribe to the Progress Report



imageTopic Cloud


Visit Our Affiliated Sites

image image
Reports


Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.

Name:
Email:
Tip:
(required)


imageArchives


imageBlog Roll