<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lowlights from Justice Sunday: Part Deux</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thinkprogress.org/2005/08/15/lowlights-from-justice-sunday-part-deux/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/08/15/lowlights-from-justice-sunday-part-deux/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 10:44:30 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/08/15/lowlights-from-justice-sunday-part-deux/comment-page-1/#comment-141984</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2005 15:23:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=1569#comment-141984</guid>
		<description>Getting back to the article: We were taught in school that there is a &quot;Check and Balance&quot; system between the 3 pillars of the Federal government. Where is that? I agree with DeLay that Congress should be writing the laws and the Judicial enforcing them. It&#039;s clear that there are a very few in the minority that can&#039;t get what they want passed as law thru Congress. Why? Because this Republic is built on the majority rule. So now the cry-babies think they can sue and get the Supreme Court to over-step it&#039;s bounds and write new legislature. *This* is un-Constitutioal and needs to be stopped. 
It is an intriguing thought that the Supreme Court should have to have a unanimous vote to overthrow any law passed by Congress. We don&#039;t want to have someone getting into the Supreme Court and getting rid of women&#039;s voting or something else for some personal reason. When it&#039;s something that these anarchists hold dear, then you&#039;ll hear the crying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Getting back to the article: We were taught in school that there is a &#8220;Check and Balance&#8221; system between the 3 pillars of the Federal government. Where is that? I agree with DeLay that Congress should be writing the laws and the Judicial enforcing them. It&#8217;s clear that there are a very few in the minority that can&#8217;t get what they want passed as law thru Congress. Why? Because this Republic is built on the majority rule. So now the cry-babies think they can sue and get the Supreme Court to over-step it&#8217;s bounds and write new legislature. *This* is un-Constitutioal and needs to be stopped.<br />
It is an intriguing thought that the Supreme Court should have to have a unanimous vote to overthrow any law passed by Congress. We don&#8217;t want to have someone getting into the Supreme Court and getting rid of women&#8217;s voting or something else for some personal reason. When it&#8217;s something that these anarchists hold dear, then you&#8217;ll hear the crying.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=141984', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/08/15/lowlights-from-justice-sunday-part-deux/comment-page-1/#comment-141981</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2005 15:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=1569#comment-141981</guid>
		<description>The term &quot;separation of church and state&quot; is un-Constitutional. No one can get around that. The government just can&#039;t make a &quot;State Church&quot; like in England. 
No one can prove that this is *not* a Christian nation or was founded on Judeo-Christian beliefs. The people who *think* they have an argument can only quote 4 of the Founding Fathers&#039; Deist ideas. 4 people out of 55 in the US Constitutional Convention and signers of the Constitution, 56 signers of the Declaration of Independence, 52 members in the Continental Congress of 1774, and 84 in it in 1776. Minority to the max? I should think so.
Then the 59,028,111 who voted *against* Bush firmly believe that he (and the Religious Right) in no way represent their views on much including religion and religion in government. Yet those same people try and tell you that these 4 people represent the beliefs of the entire population of the Colonies. You think Jefferson represented the 691,737 people in Virginia? What double-speak!

And fyi: Jesus didn&#039;t say it was impossible for the rich to enter heaven. Read the quote again. He said it was &quot;hard.&quot; 
Is anyone who stands under religion a Fundamentalist? Again, a trick of the atheist, anarchist, far-left who currently vote Democrat. Yet they tell eveyone else not to group Al-Queda and the like with good God-fearing Muslims(profiling.) Yet the terrorists are the Fundamentalists. Again, what double-speak! I hear this non-sense from the Right as well. Do they think we&#039;re all stupid lemmings who can&#039;t look things up?

Then there&#039;s the uninformed people who cry, &quot;Keep it out of our schools.&quot; How would they have fared more than 100 years ago when all the schools were actually church buildings that were also government buildings? Would they have minded that the Christian Bible was a part of the daily school life? I think it&#039;s more like &quot;put it back in&quot; instead of &quot;lets force in something new.&quot; 
And who do you think they mean when they say, &quot;In God We Trust?&quot; It ain&#039;t Allah! Benjamin Franklin found some problems in Philly after a long time in Europe. He thought the Colonists should be more tolerant of other religions. He said nowhere that the Christian way of life and it&#039;s icons should be eliminated just to keep from stepping on the toes of other people. He knew where the majority was. How many cry-babies speaking in the press (left and right) do?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The term &#8220;separation of church and state&#8221; is un-Constitutional. No one can get around that. The government just can&#8217;t make a &#8220;State Church&#8221; like in England.<br />
No one can prove that this is *not* a Christian nation or was founded on Judeo-Christian beliefs. The people who *think* they have an argument can only quote 4 of the Founding Fathers&#8217; Deist ideas. 4 people out of 55 in the US Constitutional Convention and signers of the Constitution, 56 signers of the Declaration of Independence, 52 members in the Continental Congress of 1774, and 84 in it in 1776. Minority to the max? I should think so.<br />
Then the 59,028,111 who voted *against* Bush firmly believe that he (and the Religious Right) in no way represent their views on much including religion and religion in government. Yet those same people try and tell you that these 4 people represent the beliefs of the entire population of the Colonies. You think Jefferson represented the 691,737 people in Virginia? What double-speak!</p>
<p>And fyi: Jesus didn&#8217;t say it was impossible for the rich to enter heaven. Read the quote again. He said it was &#8220;hard.&#8221;<br />
Is anyone who stands under religion a Fundamentalist? Again, a trick of the atheist, anarchist, far-left who currently vote Democrat. Yet they tell eveyone else not to group Al-Queda and the like with good God-fearing Muslims(profiling.) Yet the terrorists are the Fundamentalists. Again, what double-speak! I hear this non-sense from the Right as well. Do they think we&#8217;re all stupid lemmings who can&#8217;t look things up?</p>
<p>Then there&#8217;s the uninformed people who cry, &#8220;Keep it out of our schools.&#8221; How would they have fared more than 100 years ago when all the schools were actually church buildings that were also government buildings? Would they have minded that the Christian Bible was a part of the daily school life? I think it&#8217;s more like &#8220;put it back in&#8221; instead of &#8220;lets force in something new.&#8221;<br />
And who do you think they mean when they say, &#8220;In God We Trust?&#8221; It ain&#8217;t Allah! Benjamin Franklin found some problems in Philly after a long time in Europe. He thought the Colonists should be more tolerant of other religions. He said nowhere that the Christian way of life and it&#8217;s icons should be eliminated just to keep from stepping on the toes of other people. He knew where the majority was. How many cry-babies speaking in the press (left and right) do?<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=141981', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I-RIGHT-I</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/08/15/lowlights-from-justice-sunday-part-deux/comment-page-1/#comment-133737</link>
		<dc:creator>I-RIGHT-I</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2005 01:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=1569#comment-133737</guid>
		<description>Tony and Alexa...good job people! I&#039;d jump in but I think it would be overkill. You have soundly reddened their pinko behinds.

To put this in perspective someone should post a transcript of Ruth Bader Ginsberg&#039;s Q&amp;A in 93. This woman is truly evil, the equivalent of a drunken KKK Grand Dragon of the Filthy Left and she still got a pass. I still haven&#039;t figured out what the Conservatives got in return.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tony and Alexa&#8230;good job people! I&#8217;d jump in but I think it would be overkill. You have soundly reddened their pinko behinds.</p>
<p>To put this in perspective someone should post a transcript of Ruth Bader Ginsberg&#8217;s Q&amp;A in 93. This woman is truly evil, the equivalent of a drunken KKK Grand Dragon of the Filthy Left and she still got a pass. I still haven&#8217;t figured out what the Conservatives got in return.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=133737', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Janitors, American Federalist Urinal</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/08/15/lowlights-from-justice-sunday-part-deux/comment-page-1/#comment-98334</link>
		<dc:creator>The Janitors, American Federalist Urinal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2005 18:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=1569#comment-98334</guid>
		<description>Phyllis Schafly = Wingnut extraordinaire</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phyllis Schafly = Wingnut extraordinaire<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=98334', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lawless Lily</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/08/15/lowlights-from-justice-sunday-part-deux/comment-page-1/#comment-98087</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawless Lily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2005 13:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=1569#comment-98087</guid>
		<description>Schafly&#039;s comments are interesting:

 â€œHow do the judges get away with such outrageous decisions? By asserting that Supreme Court decisions are the supreme law of the land. But you know that is not true. That is a terrible heresy.â€

Hmmm.  What does that say about the Supremes&#039; 2000 decision in favor of Bush?  And all the legislation, executive orders, etc., the Illegitimate One signed off on in his first term?

It&#039;s amazing how regularly the hypocritical rhetoric of Schafly and her ilk comes back to bite them on the butt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Schafly&#8217;s comments are interesting:</p>
<p> â€œHow do the judges get away with such outrageous decisions? By asserting that Supreme Court decisions are the supreme law of the land. But you know that is not true. That is a terrible heresy.â€</p>
<p>Hmmm.  What does that say about the Supremes&#8217; 2000 decision in favor of Bush?  And all the legislation, executive orders, etc., the Illegitimate One signed off on in his first term?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s amazing how regularly the hypocritical rhetoric of Schafly and her ilk comes back to bite them on the butt.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=98087', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Do as I say</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/08/15/lowlights-from-justice-sunday-part-deux/comment-page-1/#comment-97776</link>
		<dc:creator>Do as I say</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2005 07:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=1569#comment-97776</guid>
		<description>Pay your taxes or get the fvck out, freeloader.

http://evans-legal.com/dan/tpfaq.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pay your taxes or get the fvck out, freeloader.</p>
<p><a href="http://evans-legal.com/dan/tpfaq.html" rel="nofollow">http://evans-legal.com/dan/tpfaq.html</a><a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=97776', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/08/15/lowlights-from-justice-sunday-part-deux/comment-page-1/#comment-97750</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2005 06:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=1569#comment-97750</guid>
		<description>Oops &quot;noble cause&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops &#8220;noble cause&#8221;.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=97750', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/08/15/lowlights-from-justice-sunday-part-deux/comment-page-1/#comment-97749</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2005 06:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=1569#comment-97749</guid>
		<description>The word &quot;stablize&quot; is the new word of the day.  That&#039;s why we are in Iraq, to &quot;stablize&quot;.

Thats a fine cause for sure, but its the &quot;unstablizing&quot; Bushie did thats a crime.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The word &#8220;stablize&#8221; is the new word of the day.  That&#8217;s why we are in Iraq, to &#8220;stablize&#8221;.</p>
<p>Thats a fine cause for sure, but its the &#8220;unstablizing&#8221; Bushie did thats a crime.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=97749', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Mockel</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/08/15/lowlights-from-justice-sunday-part-deux/comment-page-1/#comment-97686</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Mockel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2005 02:42:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=1569#comment-97686</guid>
		<description>The question is, of course, whether the U.S. Constitution should be bastardized by fundamentalist thinking as dictated by one religion. It is not taxation or forcing someone to believe in one religion or another.

This is how the religious right operates. A discussion begins that calls them to the carpet for subverting BOTH church and state. It is really an indefensable position, so instead of debating the real point the debate is shifted to such finge arguements as taxation and freedom of religion.

The far-right wingers of the Republican party are masters at this. This is why Bush is still President, why Karl Rove still has a job and why the Patriot Act is still in force. The Swift Boat people worked it to a tee. Those that sold the Iraq war did so by shifting the discussion to 9/11, thus forgoing any requirement for proof that Iraq had a hand in our national tragedy.

Alexa and Tony are probably very fine people, good Americans and exactly who the Texas Gang is looking for to pick up the torch and shift the discussion.

I have watched all this before, when the Southern Baptist Convention was taken over and first became the tool of the ultra-right wing extremists.

Phil Mockel
The Kicking Donkey
http://www.thekickingdonkey</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question is, of course, whether the U.S. Constitution should be bastardized by fundamentalist thinking as dictated by one religion. It is not taxation or forcing someone to believe in one religion or another.</p>
<p>This is how the religious right operates. A discussion begins that calls them to the carpet for subverting BOTH church and state. It is really an indefensable position, so instead of debating the real point the debate is shifted to such finge arguements as taxation and freedom of religion.</p>
<p>The far-right wingers of the Republican party are masters at this. This is why Bush is still President, why Karl Rove still has a job and why the Patriot Act is still in force. The Swift Boat people worked it to a tee. Those that sold the Iraq war did so by shifting the discussion to 9/11, thus forgoing any requirement for proof that Iraq had a hand in our national tragedy.</p>
<p>Alexa and Tony are probably very fine people, good Americans and exactly who the Texas Gang is looking for to pick up the torch and shift the discussion.</p>
<p>I have watched all this before, when the Southern Baptist Convention was taken over and first became the tool of the ultra-right wing extremists.</p>
<p>Phil Mockel<br />
The Kicking Donkey<br />
<a href="http://www.thekickingdonkey" rel="nofollow">http://www.thekickingdonkey</a><a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=97686', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeanne</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/08/15/lowlights-from-justice-sunday-part-deux/comment-page-1/#comment-97638</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeanne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2005 01:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=1569#comment-97638</guid>
		<description>Alexa, if I was a worshipper of Wicca could I demand that they teach it in school?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alexa, if I was a worshipper of Wicca could I demand that they teach it in school?<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=97638', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeanne</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/08/15/lowlights-from-justice-sunday-part-deux/comment-page-1/#comment-97619</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeanne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2005 01:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=1569#comment-97619</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d hate the law too if I was going down. I wonder how many parishoners in the audience were leaning over and whispering &quot;Old Tom is guilty as sin.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d hate the law too if I was going down. I wonder how many parishoners in the audience were leaning over and whispering &#8220;Old Tom is guilty as sin.&#8221;<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=97619', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zookeeper</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/08/15/lowlights-from-justice-sunday-part-deux/comment-page-1/#comment-97563</link>
		<dc:creator>Zookeeper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2005 00:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=1569#comment-97563</guid>
		<description>Fundamentalism in any form is dangerous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fundamentalism in any form is dangerous.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=97563', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zookeeper</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/08/15/lowlights-from-justice-sunday-part-deux/comment-page-1/#comment-97561</link>
		<dc:creator>Zookeeper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2005 00:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=1569#comment-97561</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a blindingly obvious statement but, those Justice Sunday crackpots are nuckin&#039; futs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a blindingly obvious statement but, those Justice Sunday crackpots are nuckin&#8217; futs.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=97561', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David B</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/08/15/lowlights-from-justice-sunday-part-deux/comment-page-1/#comment-97560</link>
		<dc:creator>David B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2005 00:12:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=1569#comment-97560</guid>
		<description>The evangelicals who preach their distorted history of America based on Christanity and other out of context bible passages on Sundays are no different than the clerics in Islam that spue their antiamerican hate and teachings in the mosques every Friday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The evangelicals who preach their distorted history of America based on Christanity and other out of context bible passages on Sundays are no different than the clerics in Islam that spue their antiamerican hate and teachings in the mosques every Friday.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=97560', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marie</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/08/15/lowlights-from-justice-sunday-part-deux/comment-page-1/#comment-97523</link>
		<dc:creator>Marie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2005 23:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=1569#comment-97523</guid>
		<description>Post #10 is right -- the separation of church and state is to protect churches from being taken over by the state. That&#039;s freedom of religion.  Religion is to be separated from state - and state is to be removed from religion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Post #10 is right &#8212; the separation of church and state is to protect churches from being taken over by the state. That&#8217;s freedom of religion.  Religion is to be separated from state &#8211; and state is to be removed from religion.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=97523', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KillCon 2005</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/08/15/lowlights-from-justice-sunday-part-deux/comment-page-1/#comment-97519</link>
		<dc:creator>KillCon 2005</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2005 23:33:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=1569#comment-97519</guid>
		<description>No one has the right to not be offended. We have a wall between church and state for a reason. Tax dollars are not going to promote any religion. Period. Not because I am against it, but because the founders wanted it that way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No one has the right to not be offended. We have a wall between church and state for a reason. Tax dollars are not going to promote any religion. Period. Not because I am against it, but because the founders wanted it that way.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=97519', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KillCon 2005</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/08/15/lowlights-from-justice-sunday-part-deux/comment-page-1/#comment-97514</link>
		<dc:creator>KillCon 2005</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2005 23:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=1569#comment-97514</guid>
		<description>Shorter Alexa: Blah Blah Blah (Tired old talking points) Blah Blah Blah.... lather, rinse, repeat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shorter Alexa: Blah Blah Blah (Tired old talking points) Blah Blah Blah&#8230;. lather, rinse, repeat.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=97514', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KillCon 2005</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/08/15/lowlights-from-justice-sunday-part-deux/comment-page-1/#comment-97509</link>
		<dc:creator>KillCon 2005</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2005 23:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=1569#comment-97509</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with Gore Vidal on that. Remove the tax exempt status on most of them.

F on F, SD Policy Council, FRC, CWA, and several other organizations of their ilk are simply collections of people motivated by greed and arrogance. Religion is simply in front. Thatâ€™s one of the most common and effective misuses of religion throughout history. They are no different from Richard Mellon Scaifeâ€™s henchmen, they just make themselves look better. Religion is a powerful tool, and telling people that they are not real Christians, and will not save their eternal souls unless the follow a certain group or individual, is a marvelously strong motivational tool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with Gore Vidal on that. Remove the tax exempt status on most of them.</p>
<p>F on F, SD Policy Council, FRC, CWA, and several other organizations of their ilk are simply collections of people motivated by greed and arrogance. Religion is simply in front. Thatâ€™s one of the most common and effective misuses of religion throughout history. They are no different from Richard Mellon Scaifeâ€™s henchmen, they just make themselves look better. Religion is a powerful tool, and telling people that they are not real Christians, and will not save their eternal souls unless the follow a certain group or individual, is a marvelously strong motivational tool.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=97509', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marie</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/08/15/lowlights-from-justice-sunday-part-deux/comment-page-1/#comment-97490</link>
		<dc:creator>Marie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2005 23:18:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=1569#comment-97490</guid>
		<description>Alexa, you can worhsip whatever, whoever you choose.  Just don&#039;t do it at my kids&#039; school.  It would never fly at the office so why are the schools OK?  This is not an assault on Christianity, this is a call for reasonablensss and adherence to the Constitution which calls for the separation of church and state.  Don&#039;t you see that these evangelicals who preach that they are discriminated against are self-aggrandizing false prophets, who would foist their beliefs and their interpretations of everything in society to their narrow viewpoint?  This is the antithesis of the meaning of the Constitution.  One more point, these guys are obsessed with sex - in or out of marriage, pornography, homosexuality, pregnancy, prescribed roles for sexes in society, and prostitution.  They are a scary bunch of dominating, self-righteous, sanctimonious, sneering, snobs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alexa, you can worhsip whatever, whoever you choose.  Just don&#8217;t do it at my kids&#8217; school.  It would never fly at the office so why are the schools OK?  This is not an assault on Christianity, this is a call for reasonablensss and adherence to the Constitution which calls for the separation of church and state.  Don&#8217;t you see that these evangelicals who preach that they are discriminated against are self-aggrandizing false prophets, who would foist their beliefs and their interpretations of everything in society to their narrow viewpoint?  This is the antithesis of the meaning of the Constitution.  One more point, these guys are obsessed with sex &#8211; in or out of marriage, pornography, homosexuality, pregnancy, prescribed roles for sexes in society, and prostitution.  They are a scary bunch of dominating, self-righteous, sanctimonious, sneering, snobs.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=97490', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/08/15/lowlights-from-justice-sunday-part-deux/comment-page-1/#comment-97471</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2005 23:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=1569#comment-97471</guid>
		<description>Alexa, practice whatever you want but keep it out of my kids schools.  You cannot undermine the Constitution so get over it. 

If you don&#039;t like it leave the country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alexa, practice whatever you want but keep it out of my kids schools.  You cannot undermine the Constitution so get over it. </p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t like it leave the country.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=97471', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
