The President of the Washington Times Corporation,
By on Aug 17th, 2005 at 12:55 pm
The President of the Washington Times Corporation,
Joo Dong Mun, met with North Korean dictator Kim Jong Il in Pyongyang. According to the North Korean news agency Mun “offered his congratulations to Kim Jong Il on the 60th anniversary of Korea’s liberation.”
View Most Popular
Advertisement
What We're About
What We're Fighting For
What We're Fighting Against
Featured
Subscribe to the Progress Report
Topic CloudView topics sorted by popularity
Afghanistan
Bachmann
Beck
Boehner
Business
Cheney
Civil Rights
Congress
Corporate Ethics
Dobbs
Economy
Education
Election
Energy
Environment
Ethics
Fox News
Gingrich
Glenn Beck
Global Warming
Health Care
Immigration
International Relations
Justice
LGBT
Lieberman
Limbaugh
Media
Military
O'Reilly
Obama
Palin
Pelosi
Politics
Race
Radical Right
Religion
Sports
Steele
Stimulus
Tea Parties
Tea Party
Terrorism
Veterans
Women's Rights
Visit Our Affiliated Sites
Reports
In-depth studies on select topics
Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.
ArchivesBlog Roll
Oh, Washington Times! Why must you cavort with the axis of evil?
August 17th, 2005 at 1:08 pmCongratulations ILL man.
August 17th, 2005 at 1:09 pmThe Right Wing really are communists after all. I always thought there was a direct correlation between Stalin and the Connies.
August 17th, 2005 at 1:11 pmSo Blankley and Bozell and the rest of the neo-fascist media cult at WashTimes are in fact working for a man that consorts with a sworn enemy of the U.S. Well, at least the right is consistent.
August 17th, 2005 at 1:14 pmI think that was obvious the second time Bush invited his honored guest, King Jihad of Burkastan, to his ranch to desecrate American soil with his presence. Bush’s friends. Only two groups wanted the war in Iraq: Bush supporters and al Qaeda.
August 17th, 2005 at 1:28 pmThe Washington Times is not alone in supporting the Bushco consorting with the enemy. In an editorial comment on 16 August 2005 the editors of the Las Vegas Review Journal followed the currently in vogue “justification” of the Iraq war by stating “…the underlying reason we’re in Iraq, fighting a hate-filled fanatic enemy there instead of here — is result of the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.” The previous quoted statement leads to the following conclusions: (1) The Iraqi insurgents fighting in Iraq are of the same ilk that was responsible for the attacks of 9/11; (2) There meaning Iraq; (3) Here meaning the United States. Considering the previous “in vogue justifications,” i.e. MWD, Sadam, Free Iraq, Daddy needs the oil, etc, positions of the Shrubery it is alarming and disturbing that a newspaper would parrot such trite claptrap. It is a fact that Iraq was not, repeat not, involved in the 9/11 attacks. It is a fact that the Iraqi insurgents did not exist until the Shrubbery invaded their country. It is a fact that the Iraqi insurgents have no means nor desire to attack the US terrorists (in their eyes and rightly so) in the US (even if the suicide bomber could swim the Atlantic, the dynamite would be too soggy to explode). It is a fact that when the United States had an obligation and an opportunity to fight the true terrorists here, in the United States, our esteemed Commander-In-Chief was lacking. He was told, before the fact, that the attack was possible and probable. He chose to ignore the warning. During the attack he was so busy improving his mind by reading a very deep tome (to his level of reading) about a billy goat, that it took him several minutes to react. Like the great hero he presents himself to be he boarded Air Force One, and abandoning all family and countrymen, hid under the metaphorical bed in Nebraska. To add insult to injury he proceeded to allow (allow may be too kind since he provided the aircraft) the true terrorists (the Saud and Osama families) to escape the country. If he wants to fight “them” “there” our troops should be in Sauri Arabia kicking, instead of DUHbya kissing, the king’s ring or posterior as the case may be. It is a disgrace to this Country and an insult to the intelligent reader when supposedly legitimate newspapers prostitute themselves in such a manner.
August 17th, 2005 at 2:07 pmYes, Mother, I know it should be “Saudi.”
August 17th, 2005 at 2:11 pma little follow up to how well were winning the war on terror.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/4158478.stm
August 17th, 2005 at 2:18 pmmun or moon is a very close friend of the bush family.
moon has given thousands to both hwbush and gwbush. moon also held a cornation of himself in the dirkens bldging in washington,dc .the news barely picked up on it.the bush family has some very strange connections. there’s a lot to rethink about this family’s connections.
as for as john roberts files i would check roves office or gonzo’s office they are lost they are hidden or wasn’t a man just reappointed to hold an office who was found guilty of shredding national secrets during the watergate era,there’s your man! he ordered the files to be stolen and then ……..take it from there……. Impeach bush/cheney and all the damn Neo Cons! America the lost country…….
August 17th, 2005 at 2:34 pmI see. So the media is only as liberal as the konservatives who own them? Interesting idea.
Now add the dimension of the MSM cavorting with other Asses of Evil. And these people are telling us what our world view should be? No wonder there is a divide in this country between those who think and sheeple! :-(
August 17th, 2005 at 2:34 pmAnd Tony Blannkley pontificates on and on – these guys all have a price and when someone pays them, they will do whatever it takes. No integrity.
August 17th, 2005 at 7:05 pm2194
You are invited to visit some helpful info on 963
November 4th, 2005 at 5:04 pm