Think Progress

A Progressive Exit Strategy

by Think Progress on Sep 30th, 2005 at 4:56 pm

A Progressive Exit Strategy»

1,934 U.S. soldiers have died and nearly 15,000 have been wounded in Iraq. Our military is stretched to the breaking point. Iraq has become a new haven for global terrorists, and now sits on the brink of sectarian civil war. And for this, American taxpayers will soon have paid three hundred billion dollars — $300,000,000,000.00.

Nevertheless, no alternatives to the President’s discredited “stay the course” strategy have emerged in government or among foreign policy elites. Clearly, the status quo is untenable. But implementing an immediate pull-out is neither strategically sound nor logistically possible.

Today, the Center for American Progress released a progressive exit strategy for Iraq. It will ensure the strength of our armed forces, increase chances of stability in Iraq, and culminate with the redeployment of virtually all U.S. forces out of Iraq by 2007. Some details on the plan follow: Read the rest of this entry »




DeLay’s Smear Campaign Against Earle Unravels»

Tom DeLay has used Travis County District Attorney Ronnie Earle’s indictment of former Texas attorney general Jim Mattox as proof that that Earle is a “liberal political fanatic.” Here’s DeLay on Fox News this Wednesday:

The political situation in Texas back in those days was conservative Democrats against liberal Democrats. He indicted the lieutenant governor, a conservative Democrat. He indicted Jim Mattox, the attorney general…This is just the sleaziest of politics. He is a fanatic, a liberal political fanatic.

Jim Mattox, however, has a much different view. Appearing on Fox and Friends this morning, he was asked if he thought Earle was politically motivated:

Maddox

Watch in QT Streaming

I don’t think he’s overly political. I think he’s been, frankly, very tenacious about this and more tenacious than what most of us would have thought possible because Delay and his friends have spent probably $2 or $3 million on legal fees in an effort to try to hide the facts of this particular matter. I think that the facts in this particular case were so egregious that any district attorney should have taken a look at the matter.




Vietnam 2005

by Christy Harvey on Sep 30th, 2005 at 2:03 pm

Vietnam 2005»

Ever since Vietnam, military strategists have agreed using enemy body counts is a useless benchmark for success.

Conrad Crane, director of the Military History Institute at the U.S. Army War College: “It was a pretty useless statistic that did more harm than good.”

Gen. Norman Schwarzkopf, on attempt to quantify success in Grenada: “We need to stay away from this body count business. It caused us terrible trouble in Vietnam and it will cause us terrible trouble here.”

Gen. Tommy Franks, 3/18/02: “You know we don’t do body counts.”

Sec. Donald Rumsfeld, 11/2/03: “We don’t do body counts on other people.”

The Washington Post, however, reported last week:

Using enemy body counts as a benchmark, the U.S. military claimed gains against Abu Musab Zarqawi’s foreign-led fighters last week even as they mounted their deadliest attacks on Iraq’s capital.

Question: Why is the Pentagon now using enemy body counts as a measure of success/failure?




DeLay Blames Indictment On Newspaper Editorial»

Always one for finger-pointing, DeLay’s newest target in his fight against his criminal indictment? The Austin-American Statesman newspaper.

On September 28, responding to the criminal indictment, DeLay blamed a September 11 editorial by The Statesman:

(As) recently as two weeks ago, Mr. Earle himself publicly admitted I had never been a focus or target of his inquiry. Soon thereafter, Mr. Earle’s hometown newspaper ran a biting editorial about his investigation, rhetorically asking what the point had been, after all, if I wasn’t to be indicted….It was this renewed political pressure in the waning days of his hollow investigation that led this morning’s action.

A September 29 editorial in The Statesman responds:

A Sept. 11 American-Statesman editorial questioned why only the political action committees and not the individuals behind them had been indicted. DeLay was not mentioned by name, nor was there an allusion to him. It is either DeLay’s hubris or his conscience that leads him to think that the editorial targeted him.

The much-discussed September 11 editorial can be found here. As the paper’s editorial staff states, the editorial mentions several men by name, including indicted John Colyandro, but never mentions Tom DeLay.

Let’s recap: DeLay has now blamed The Austin-American Statesman, “unabashed partisan zealot” District Attorney Earle (the truth is here), a “runaway” grand jury, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, the DCCC, Rep. Rahm Emanuel, Democrats generally, and the rest of the news media.

Poor Tom DeLay.




Partisan Witchhunt? Foreman of “Runaway” Grand Jury Praises DeLay»

The central pillar of Tom DeLay’s defense is that Travis Country prosecutor Ronnie Earle is an “unabashed partisan,” and that DeLay is being targeted because of his political success.

But Ronnie Earle didn’t issue the indictment against Tom DeLay. A grand jury did. And as it turns out, the jury foreman William Gibson is a former sheriff’s deputy who praises DeLay specifically for his “aggressiveness.” Via Billmon, we see that Gibson spoke out yesterday:

He did his duty and that bound him to look at Tom Delay as just another Texan accused of criminal conspiracy, [Gibson] said.

“I like his aggressiveness and everything, and I had nothing against the House majority man, but I felt that we had enough evidence, not only me, but the other grand jury members,” Gibson said.

The grand jury foreman also takes great exception to accusations that he and 11 other grand jury members followed the lead of Travis County District Attorney Ronnie Earle instead of following the evidence.

“It was not a rubber stamp deal. It was not an overnight deal. If we needed extra information, it was provided to us,” Gibson said. …

Gibson thinks there is enough evidence to convict Delay.

“We would not have handed down an indictment. We would have no-billed the man, if we didn’t feel there was sufficient evidence,” said Gibson.




DeLay Will Prove His Conspiracy Theories “When It’s Timely”»

Tom DeLay says he has “very good evidence” of a massive conspiracy between Ronnie Earle, Nancy Pelosi and other liberals. He just can’t release that information yet, can’t explain why he can’t and can’t say when he will be able to do so:

DeLay Conspiracy

Watch DeLay: Quicktime Streaming

Transcript below: Read the rest of this entry »




Bush Misleads on Progress in Iraq

by Nico Pitney on Sep 30th, 2005 at 8:46 am

Bush Misleads on Progress in Iraq»

President Bush, 9/28/05:

At this moment, more than a dozen Iraqi battalions have completed training and are conducting anti-terrorist operations in Ramadi and Fallujah. More than 20 battalions are operating in Baghdad. And some have taken the lead in operations in major sectors of the city. In total, more than 100 battalions are operating throughout Iraq. Our commanders report that the Iraqi forces are operating with increasing effectiveness.

Associated Press, 9/29/05:

The number of Iraqi battalions capable of combat without U.S. support has dropped from three to one, the top American commander in Iraq told Congress Thursday.




NYT confirms

by Nico Pitney on Sep 29th, 2005 at 10:50 pm

NYT confirms»

that Judith Miller will testify about her discussion with Scooter Libby about outed CIA operative Valerie Plame. (More on Libby’s role in our comprehensive Plamegate database.)




Judith Miller is free.

by Nico Pitney on Sep 29th, 2005 at 7:21 pm

Judith Miller is free.»

“She was released after she had a telephone conversation with the Vice President Dick Cheney’s chief of staff, I. Lewis Libby … [who] reaffirmed that he had released Miller from a promise of confidentiality more than a year ago.” (Via Atrios)




Powerline’s “Super Lawyer” Needs Your Help»

John H. Hinderaker, who writes for the right-wing blog Powerline, bills himself as a Harvard-educated “lawyer with a nationwide litigation practice.” According to his law firm bio he was even named Minnesota’s 2005 “Super Lawyer of the Year.” For someone with such impressive credentials he seems to be quite confused about basic legal concepts. For example, he had this to say after reading DeLay’s criminal indictment:

Based on the indictment, which we linked to yesterday, it doesn’t appear that Earle has any evidence at all. In all probability, the DeLay indictment will be thrown out at some point…

An indictment, however, isn’t supposed to include evidence of a crime; it’s supposed to include an allegation of a crime. The Washington Post explains:

No evidence to support the conspiracy charge was cited in the indictment, which says only that DeLay and two named associates entered “into an agreement with one or more of each other” or with the committee to conduct the funds transfer. But Texas law permits such evidence to be left out of the indictment, so it is rarely included.

As someone with a “nationwide litigation practice” Hinderaker should know it’s a bad idea to reveal your strategy to opposing counsel before it’s necessary.

Email Hinderaker at jhinderaker@faegre.com and tell him to read Chapter 21 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure.

UPDATE: Hinderaker responds:

Some goofball on a left-wing site attacked this post earlier today, claiming that I was criticizing Earle’s indictment for not reciting the evidence against DeLay.

Read the rest of this entry »




Rumsfeld on insurgent infiltration of Iraqi forces:»

“It’s a problem that’s faced by police forces in every major city in our country, that criminals infiltrate and sign up to join the police force.”