Comments on: ROBERTS DAY 2: 25 Ways To Not Answer The Question http://thinkprogress.org/2005/09/13/23-ways/ Fri, 27 Nov 2009 03:28:04 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: Gay Sex Gay Ass Gay Ass http://thinkprogress.org/2005/09/13/23-ways/comment-page-2/#comment-4894494 Gay Sex Gay Ass Gay Ass Sun, 13 Apr 2008 21:25:53 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/?p=1830#comment-4894494 <strong>Gay Sex Gay Ass Gay Ass</strong> I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view Gay Sex Gay Ass Gay Ass

I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view

]]> By: Burt Reynolds http://thinkprogress.org/2005/09/13/23-ways/comment-page-2/#comment-4822204 Burt Reynolds Wed, 09 Apr 2008 04:06:38 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/?p=1830#comment-4822204 <strong>Burt Reynolds</strong> Are you sure this is correct? Burt Reynolds

Are you sure this is correct?

]]> By: McLovin http://thinkprogress.org/2005/09/13/23-ways/comment-page-2/#comment-4819110 McLovin Wed, 09 Apr 2008 00:05:44 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/?p=1830#comment-4819110 <strong>McLovin</strong> I declare war on thee. McLovin

I declare war on thee.

]]> By: Teen Girls Teen Chat Teen Panties http://thinkprogress.org/2005/09/13/23-ways/comment-page-2/#comment-4814314 Teen Girls Teen Chat Teen Panties Tue, 08 Apr 2008 19:01:14 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/?p=1830#comment-4814314 <strong>Teen Girls Teen Chat Teen Panties</strong> I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view Teen Girls Teen Chat Teen Panties

I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view

]]> By: Pee Female Pee Pee Hole http://thinkprogress.org/2005/09/13/23-ways/comment-page-2/#comment-4451780 Pee Female Pee Pee Hole Mon, 24 Mar 2008 08:49:20 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/?p=1830#comment-4451780 <strong>Pee Female Pee Pee Hole</strong> I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view Pee Female Pee Pee Hole

I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view

]]> By: Payday Loans No Faxing http://thinkprogress.org/2005/09/13/23-ways/comment-page-2/#comment-4394076 Payday Loans No Faxing Fri, 21 Mar 2008 19:39:26 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/?p=1830#comment-4394076 <strong>Payday Loans No Faxing</strong> Spendid payday loans that was immediate and also effortless to apply for before you absolutely are in drought of cash. Payday Loans No Faxing

Spendid payday loans that was immediate and also effortless to apply for before you absolutely are in drought of cash.

]]> By: Pee Public Pee Public Pissing http://thinkprogress.org/2005/09/13/23-ways/comment-page-2/#comment-4338454 Pee Public Pee Public Pissing Tue, 18 Mar 2008 22:55:05 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/?p=1830#comment-4338454 <strong>Pee Public Pee Public Pissing</strong> I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view Pee Public Pee Public Pissing

I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view

]]> By: Think Progress » Harriet Miers May Oppose a Right to Contraception? http://thinkprogress.org/2005/09/13/23-ways/comment-page-2/#comment-177288 Think Progress » Harriet Miers May Oppose a Right to Contraception? Tue, 18 Oct 2005 17:32:58 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/?p=1830#comment-177288 [...] Coupled with her previous support for a constitutional ban on abortion, Miers’ silence on the matter is notable. Even John Roberts, who refused to discuss his position on virtually any past cases during his hearings, did state his support for Griswold: I agree with the Griswold court’s conclusion that marital privacy extends to contraception and availability of that. [...] [...] Coupled with her previous support for a constitutional ban on abortion, Miers’ silence on the matter is notable. Even John Roberts, who refused to discuss his position on virtually any past cases during his hearings, did state his support for Griswold: I agree with the Griswold court’s conclusion that marital privacy extends to contraception and availability of that. [...]

]]> By: Eyeroller http://thinkprogress.org/2005/09/13/23-ways/comment-page-2/#comment-136147 Eyeroller Fri, 16 Sep 2005 04:37:51 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/?p=1830#comment-136147 #48, the only story that I heard was that Louis Farrakhan was circulating that theory. That should tell you as much as you need to know about that story. When the flood levels stabilized, the Corps of Engineers did drill some holes in places to facilitate the draining of water. Q: What is the Most Dangerous Place in Washington? A: Anywhere between Sen. Shumer and a camera or microphone. #48, the only story that I heard was that Louis Farrakhan was circulating that theory. That should tell you as much as you need to know about that story.

When the flood levels stabilized, the Corps of Engineers did drill some holes in places to facilitate the draining of water.

Q: What is the Most Dangerous Place in Washington?

A: Anywhere between Sen. Shumer and a camera or microphone.

]]> By: babydeebie http://thinkprogress.org/2005/09/13/23-ways/comment-page-2/#comment-134975 babydeebie Thu, 15 Sep 2005 00:36:04 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/?p=1830#comment-134975 Roberts has whacked eyes. And those "Please don't hurt me" knit eyebrows? Oy. Roberts is all about the law's letter, and nothing about its spirit. THAT is why he will NEVER vote for the human side of any issue. That is also why Republicans have nothing to fear. The way Roberts speaks of what the SCOTUS can and should do---review trial papers and see if errors were made---you'd have to conclude that a computer program could be written to perform that paint-by-numbers task. Roberts has whacked eyes. And those “Please don’t hurt me” knit eyebrows? Oy.
Roberts is all about the law’s letter, and nothing about its spirit.
THAT is why he will NEVER vote for the human side of any issue.
That is also why Republicans have nothing to fear.
The way Roberts speaks of what the SCOTUS can and should do—review trial papers and see if errors were made—you’d have to conclude that a computer program could be written to perform that paint-by-numbers task.

]]> By: Astroboy http://thinkprogress.org/2005/09/13/23-ways/comment-page-2/#comment-134938 Astroboy Wed, 14 Sep 2005 23:36:25 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/?p=1830#comment-134938 Roberts is going to bite the Repugnantcans in the ass big time! He lets them think he's a lapdog, but he's just been playing the game. He's worked his entire life with a singular focus - to get to SCOTUS, and those Repug FOOLS just handed him more than he even expected - Chief Justice!! He's bitten the bullet, touted the party line, whorishly laid down with dogs, but now his EGO will have to answer to NO ONE!! Roberts is going to bite the Repugnantcans in the ass big time! He lets them think he’s a lapdog, but he’s just been playing the game. He’s worked his entire life with a singular focus – to get to SCOTUS, and those Repug FOOLS just handed him more than he even expected – Chief Justice!!
He’s bitten the bullet, touted the party line, whorishly laid down with dogs, but now his EGO will have to answer to NO ONE!!

]]> By: The View From The Left » Blog Archive » Roberts Still Won’t Answer Questions http://thinkprogress.org/2005/09/13/23-ways/comment-page-2/#comment-134915 The View From The Left » Blog Archive » Roberts Still Won’t Answer Questions Wed, 14 Sep 2005 23:01:23 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/?p=1830#comment-134915 [...] Think Progress counteracts Roberts’ claim about being forthcoming with this gem: 25 Ways To Not Answer The Question [...] [...] Think Progress counteracts Roberts’ claim about being forthcoming with this gem: 25 Ways To Not Answer The Question [...]

]]> By: kjlovell http://thinkprogress.org/2005/09/13/23-ways/comment-page-2/#comment-134235 kjlovell Wed, 14 Sep 2005 16:04:20 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/?p=1830#comment-134235 I have said since day one, anyone dumbya supports must be has to be is indeed the wrong wrong man for the job. If dumbya likes him, that's enough information to turn him back to the private sector. Some people have made an effort to correct the sins of the shrubs, do a google on Bertha Champagne. I have said since day one, anyone dumbya supports must be has to be is indeed the wrong wrong man for the job.

If dumbya likes him, that’s enough information to turn him back to the private sector.

Some people have made an effort to correct the sins of the shrubs, do a google on Bertha Champagne.

]]> By: Brandi http://thinkprogress.org/2005/09/13/23-ways/comment-page-2/#comment-134228 Brandi Wed, 14 Sep 2005 15:47:39 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/?p=1830#comment-134228 crying, crying, and more crying. Tis true reliant. crying, crying, and more crying. Tis true reliant.

]]> By: reliant http://thinkprogress.org/2005/09/13/23-ways/comment-page-2/#comment-134211 reliant Wed, 14 Sep 2005 15:35:41 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/?p=1830#comment-134211 Randy - Stop trotting out the Ginsburg line; it's not true. Get the transcript. It's a hoax and a lie. Why don't you get facts straight before posting/speaking (or stop lying). Randy – Stop trotting out the Ginsburg line; it’s not true. Get the transcript. It’s a hoax and a lie. Why don’t you get facts straight before posting/speaking (or stop lying).

]]> By: Now That's Progress http://thinkprogress.org/2005/09/13/23-ways/comment-page-2/#comment-134125 Now That's Progress Wed, 14 Sep 2005 13:51:57 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/?p=1830#comment-134125 <strong>John Roberts' Bald Spot</strong> The justices already on the Supreme Court have no qualms about spouting their opinions, especially on abortion, but it's always a cat and mouse game before confirmation, as if John Roberts hasn't formed an opinion on anything in 50 years, but was sim... John Roberts’ Bald Spot

The justices already on the Supreme Court have no qualms about spouting their opinions, especially on abortion, but it’s always a cat and mouse game before confirmation, as if John Roberts hasn’t formed an opinion on anything in 50 years, but was sim…

]]> By: Randy http://thinkprogress.org/2005/09/13/23-ways/comment-page-2/#comment-134111 Randy Wed, 14 Sep 2005 13:28:01 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/?p=1830#comment-134111 And will concerned Senators cut through the White House rhetoric and clarify that these questions are fair game and must be answered if Roberts wants to get confirmed? Just how many times did Ginsberg refuse to answer the question posed to her? Democrats have brought this upon themselves. They have destroyed this process, the Republicans. And will concerned Senators cut through the White House rhetoric and clarify that these questions are fair game and must be answered if Roberts wants to get confirmed?

Just how many times did Ginsberg refuse to answer the question posed to her? Democrats have brought this upon themselves. They have destroyed this process, the Republicans.

]]> By: Keith H. http://thinkprogress.org/2005/09/13/23-ways/comment-page-2/#comment-134083 Keith H. Wed, 14 Sep 2005 12:44:44 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/?p=1830#comment-134083 Anyone that junior supports HAS to be a lieing, party serving douche-bag. Anyone that junior supports HAS to be a lieing, party serving douche-bag.

]]> By: reliant http://thinkprogress.org/2005/09/13/23-ways/comment-page-2/#comment-134073 reliant Wed, 14 Sep 2005 12:34:52 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/?p=1830#comment-134073 Get on these stories and get the Senate Democrats and sympathetic Republicans to articulate the right standard and get their questions answered. Get on these stories and get the Senate Democrats and sympathetic Republicans to articulate the right standard and get their questions answered.

]]> By: reliant http://thinkprogress.org/2005/09/13/23-ways/comment-page-1/#comment-134071 reliant Wed, 14 Sep 2005 12:32:41 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/?p=1830#comment-134071 Dodging and weaving is right. When will Senate Democrats exercise their constitutional duty and shelve Roberts’ nomination until he answers their questions. Please direct any Senate Democrats and legislative aides to these stories below so they have the facts about the Senate's constitutional right to have their question's answered: <a href="http://reliantmedia.blogspot.com/2005/09/any-question-is-fair-game-has-john.html" rel="nofollow">Any Question is Fair Game: Has John Roberts Read the Advice and Consent Clause</a> <a href="http://reliantmedia.blogspot.com/2005/09/radicals-in-robes-is-john-roberts.html" rel="nofollow">Radicals in Robes: Is John Roberts a Stealth Nominee</a> Will the media keep giving this guy a free pass or will they look past nice suits and theatrics and see a judge shamelessly trying to circumvent the Senate's constitutionally conferred powers? And will concerned Senators cut through the White House rhetoric and clarify that these questions are fair game and must be answered if Roberts wants to get confirmed? Dodging and weaving is right. When will Senate Democrats exercise their constitutional duty and shelve Roberts’ nomination until he answers their questions. Please direct any Senate Democrats and legislative aides to these stories below so they have the facts about the Senate’s constitutional right to have their question’s answered:

Any Question is Fair Game: Has John Roberts Read the Advice and Consent Clause

Radicals in Robes: Is John Roberts a Stealth Nominee

Will the media keep giving this guy a free pass or will they look past nice suits and theatrics and see a judge shamelessly trying to circumvent the Senate’s constitutionally conferred powers?

And will concerned Senators cut through the White House rhetoric and clarify that these questions are fair game and must be answered if Roberts wants to get confirmed?

]]>