Think Progress

Halliburton

By admin on Sep 20th, 2005 at 5:07 pm

Halliburton»

“knowingly exposes troops and civilians to contaminated water from Iraq’s Euphrates River,” according to two former employees.




Sort Comments By: Top Rated | Date

52 Responses to “Halliburton”

  1. Ryan Neat Says:

    So do the republicans here. They refuse to sign mercury in our water environmental protections, despite the fact that an eagle was recently found with mercury poison. If the eagle has mercury poison, then our food supply is tainted enough with mercury to affect fetus and childhood development. All of those anti-abortion bigots get a fussy about aborting a fetus, but they seem to not give a rats a$$ if the fuhrer poisons it!


  2. afterthought Says:

    Well, It all seems to fit with Halliburton
    profits being the number driver of all
    decisions doesn’t it?
    Sort of interesting that all the GOP
    screamers have nothing to say about that
    conflict of interest.


  3. Clyde the Ripper Says:

    What can you expect when the Democrats held back the money for the water purifiers? Ain’t no way we are gonna give up any of our $80B in fees and retainers and profit to do some thing that is not on the contract. Just wait til you see what Uncle Dick has told us to do in the water in NOLA.


  4. progressive and proud Says:

    Ryan, as long as a fetus becomes a child, then you can do what you want with it. It just has to be born, then who gives a shit. All they want is the birth. Now THAT is strange. Knowing most of them support the death penalty. Again - just birth the damn thing. Really warm folks them repubs.


  5. Ryan Says:

    #3 ‘profit’

    nuff said. perfect example of why consevatism comes under so much criticism. this group thinks only about themselves rather than the country as a whole and don’t care who dies off in the process.


  6. Keith H. Says:

    Halliburton’s bottom line: priority one …
    All other priorities recended …
    Crew .. expendable.


  7. Sharon Cox Says:

    And just what do you think Bushes fast track war’s are.? This guy has been a talk out of both sides of his mouth since the beginning. He push Texas into the number one slot for capital punishment and has killed thousands of our own and Iraq’s since day one. I read all about him before he stole the presidency. His business and moral sence stinks, always has. His popularity is slipping though and getting this bunch out can’t happen quick enough for me. Maybe in the end their arrogance and greed will do it and we will just watch…..Blessings


  8. Spudge-Boy Says:

    #4

    The reason they want the birth is that their rich fat cat doctor buddies make money off of that. Can you say HMOs rape people. I know I can.


  9. wisedup Says:

    Do we all realize how long it is going to take to repair the damage the ‘bushies’ have done. The thought scares me. The faster we IMPEACH him, the better everyones future will be. Please America,no more of the same.


  10. Ryan Says:

    i love the fact that i spelled conservatism incorrectly. joy. anyway…how can we impeach him when his party controls everything? the best we can do is to vote for anything BUT a republican. no bushes, no rices, no guillianis (keep your eye on this last one..he’s real slick.)


  11. Marie Says:

    We should not be surprised. Halliburton is a grotesque example of Republicanism. Profits over humanity every time. People are expendable, money is theirs to keep. Bad water, spoiled food, ho-hum, they’re only soldiers, and maybe Iraqis. These greedy degenerates are stinking up the place.
    Ryan, I agree with you when you say they love the fetus and despise the baby. They only purport to love the fetus because it pleases their Jesus freakin’ television evangelical nut jobs, because when it comes to day care, health care, schools and other necessities for children, they are stingy, selfish and smug. Spudgeboy, you’re right too when you when you say they keep the HMOs happy while the sick person is screwed, shoved from pillar to post, until he finally surrenders; later he turns up at an emergency room.


  12. WiscoDuk Says:

    I know several people who have worked for KBR (Kellogg Brown & Root) on construction sites around the country. They reportedly could care less about the tradesmen that work for them. They generally don’t provide drinking water at all and have the on site “port-o-johns” cleaned least as possible- they figure the tradesmen will spend too much time in the crapper if it’s clean. I’ll bet the folks on their dole cleaning up after Katrina are not provided with the proper safety equipment for the hazards they face.

    If they treat their labor like pigs…no surprise they treat the troops the same way. Makes me sick that they are given no-bid contracts along with the elimination of Davis-Bacon. As I’ve said before, they are not going to charge the government any less for paying their help poverty wages.


  13. Ryan Neat Says:

    “how can we impeach him when his party controls everything?”

    Indicting the election officials who helped him steal the election is a good start. If enough of this happens then democrats will police the 2006 election to ensure fraud isn’t the only thing holding republicans in office.

    http://www.bradblog.com/archives/00001780.htm


  14. Ryan Neat Says:

    Now we all know why Brown REALLY got the job. Apparently he defrauded florida taxpayers and used the money to buy votes for bush in the 2004 election.

    http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/092005S.shtml

    Well the kickbacks just keep coming…


  15. Ryan Says:

    didnt democrats and other parties (along w/ people like Michael Moore) police the 2004 election? i’m not trying to promote hopelessness..i just want to know what they didn’t do then that they could do know..and why its taking so long for these indictments.


  16. Ryan Neat Says:

    Ryan,

    They did, and in fact there was widespread complaints of fraud that were filed. The mainstream media however refused to cover this. There were I kid you not 10s of thousands of complaints filed!

    As for why it has taken so long, the wheels of justice run slowly when the power of the federal government obstructs you.


  17. Susan Says:

    If Halliburtoon is such a bad employer then why do people work for the scumbags?

    There are alternatives to working for criminals.


  18. Clyde the Ripper Says:

    Why do people work for Wal-Mart, or for that matter any company? Mostly because it is a job that fits their qualifications and attainable goals. Why do people buy lottery tickets? Why do people vote one way or the other or not at all? All “why” questions have no answer and a myriad of answers. Why are we stuck with Bush now? Infinite answers and one answer–the people who oppose him screwed up. I didn’t work hard enough; my Brother-in-law didn’t contribute enough; my cousin didn’t take her neighbor to the polls. We all had small excuses while the crooks had a lot to gain. We all must do all we can and try for more. If we beat the Repugs then we can put KBR out of business and replace it with a legitimate company and nobody will have to ask why. We just have to want honesty and legitimate government more than the Roves, Bushes, Cheney’s and all the other sub-humans want their ill-gotten gains. AMEN


  19. Marie Says:

    Susan, Most people have a price, unfortunately.


  20. Susan Says:

    Clyde, 100,000 Walmart employees are suing Walmart for 66 million bucks. They claim they were denied lunch breaks.

    Heard it on WGN Morning News this a.m.

    Where are Halliburtoons employees? Gotta hit em where it hurts!

    Why isn’t Bush being charged with criminal negligence for the deaths in the Gulf Coast? Why isn’t anyone filing civil suits, wrongful death.

    Where are the lawyers that Bushie bashed throughout his campaign?


  21. Susan Says:

    “Most people have a price”. Good reason to hire attorneys to file their cases.


  22. Clyde the Ripper Says:

    But we have to do it!!! Not just ask why. The answer is because. Because we don’t try hard enough to stop them. When we get on top they will be asking “WHY?” And the answer is still because. Because we wanted it more thay they, because we tried a little harder, because I put one more stupid picture or cartoon on my web page, because just one more person went to the Impeach Bush Rally on Saturday. The question is not why, the question is “Why Not?’ and you have to answer that one. Don’t tell me it can’t be done, just help me do it!


  23. Ryan Neat Says:

    Moderator,

    Will you please respond tomorrow with handling MrWrong and his murder threats against Brian? I’m very worried that he’s disturbed enough to hurt someone who works for you. He made a death threat against brian and the rest of us liberals on this site, and followed it up with posting racist literature from a KKK site. He’s clearly a deranged psychopath and not just the average crazy republican…


  24. WiscoDuk Says:

    #17

    Susan,

    Money.

    Although KBR pays a barely livable wage they pay a wage none the less. In some places, $12 an hour is very good money. With hopes of making $18, it’s even more attractive. BIG money overseas if ya want to…may be $60g…if ya live through it.

    They pay a higher wage than the local 7-11 as a starting pay and promise their “inductees” the world…apprenticeships, future benefits, increasing pay scale ,etc. The trouble is, construction jobs are very temporary with even some larger projects lasting only a year or so. When a job is done it’s over. When KBR pulls up stakes, there is no more job, apprenticeship, better pay, etc.

    In the mean time, and this comes from folks that have been there, they have little regard for the welfare of their workers. KBR gets involved heavily in the chemi and oil industries. When a plant needs major maintenance or upgrades KBR is often called in. This is very dangerous work often involving highly toxic materials. KBR workers are often exposed to all kinds of nasty stuff without the proper training in identifying hazards and have very little if any training in dealing with them. You’d be surprised what some folks do for $12 an hour. I could go on here but in short…temporary = expendable. They are also very good at keeping their disgruntled employees quiet…they got the legal team.

    The alternative is? It used to be unions.


  25. Ryan Neat Says:

    WiscoDuk,

    They call them burn and loot in texas for a good reason. Those guys are the most criminal mafia outfit in the country.


  26. WiscoDuk Says:

    #25
    Ryan…They need a Michael Moore type expose’


  27. cynical ex-hippie Says:

    Reminds me of an old joke that used to be popular in Texas but isn’t any more…

    Kennedy and Johnson were in the oval office, their first day on the job when the phone rings. It’s the Pope of Rome, wondering what they can do about the Vatican’s leaky roof. “Don’t worry there, Holy Father,” Kennedy replied, “We’ll, er, do whatever it takes to fix it.” Johnson quickly added, “Just make sure Brown & Root get the contract!”


  28. afterthought Says:

    Why am I not surprized Wisco.
    Back to robber barons.
    To paraphrase Santayana:
    I guess history must repeat itself for people
    to re-learn the lessons.


  29. Susan Says:

    WiscoDuk, Halliburtoon employees can file lawsuits for dangerous working conditions. They have legal teams too. All they have to do is look up “lawyers” in the phonebook. If they choose not to then they are a part of the problem, not the solution.

    Believe me I know for a fact that employers hate lawsuits, just ask my last employer.

    Check out what’s left of his business and his marriage. Not much.


  30. WiscoDuk Says:

    #27

    Good point! Bushco certainly did’nt invent KBR. KBR’s Santa Claus is just pulling the strings now (again).


  31. Ryan Neat Says:

    Susan,

    The problem is that companies like halliburton also have judges in their pockets and they use the scorched earth legal philosophy. To make an example out of employees, anyone who sues is basically blitzkrieged by a superior economic force. Employees have very little possibility of economically resisting a company of that side without a sponsor. It’s part of why unions were created…


  32. WiscoDuk Says:

    #29

    I kinda hear ya…but its not that easy. Remember…these guys are the pros of pros and very connected. Not a company small enough to be brought down by a lawsuit (or even hundreds of them). They also have a hell of a legal team. Good luck finding a lawyer willing to take them on. Besides, employees sign lots of paperwork with fine print which when it all boils down…is basically a hold harmless agreement.


  33. Susan Says:

    Doesn’t matter if you win the case or not Ryan Neat. Lawsuits cost money and cause stress. Getting the media to report the lawsuit helps too. Look at Walmarts lawsuit. The media is reporting that one.

    Regardless, being a chickenshit is not the answer, standing up for your rights is.

    Personally, I’d rather be jobless and poor than slave for an abusive employer.

    In my original post I was suggesting taking charge of your own life and working for yourself.

    Thats what I do. You can learn more by listening to my radio show at my website. (I talk about thinkprogress there because I believe in what thinkprogress does)

    I’ve created my own job.


  34. afterthought Says:

    I am with Wisco here: It is very dangerous
    to file suit against an employer like Halliburton.
    Most large companies smash employee lawsuits.
    People like Judge Roberts will help Halliburton
    as much as they can.
    It really is pretty hopeless.
    I give anyone immense credit who is willing
    to try.
    Career suicide is the correct term, both at
    current employer and any future as well.


  35. afterthought Says:

    More power to you Susan. I am glad
    you are out there.
    Some people can’t take the hit.
    Call them chicken if you want,
    but they have mouths to feed and mortgages
    to keep.


  36. WiscoDuk Says:

    “And I’d rather be a free man in my grave, than to be a puppet or a slave”

    Anyone know who Joe Hill was? (The above quote is not connected)


  37. afterthought Says:

    Still, If things get bad enough, more
    people will fight one way or the other.
    Revolution is ugly, so I hope it does
    not come to that.


  38. Ryan Neat Says:

    Susan,

    Many people who would want to use the lawyers to fight can’t afford them. Those that can would prefer to use that money to get on with their lives. Lawsuits are difficult to be a part of - I know because I’ve been on both sides of them personally. They’re distracting, destructive and generally determined by what lawyer is chosen and what judge you get more than the validity of your case. There are good and bad lawyers and judges and you toss a coin as to your fortune.

    So while I appreciate your spunk, and I share it, frankly unions are better protection than individuals filing lawsuits… The second choice is costly and fraught with dangers I fear. The legal system has become stacked for those who have money. The whole premise of the frivolous lawsuits recently used to limit awards is just another way to tighten that noose on poor people unfortunately.


  39. Susan Says:

    One last post on fighting for your rights.

    In 1990 me, little ol me sued the Social Security Administration. Did I get the results I expected? Absolutely. Did I have a lawyer? No.

    My nephews father died and was entitled to Social Security Survivors benefits. (You know those benefits your tax dollars are supposed to pay for).

    My nephews mother and stepmother chose not to fight for what the child was entitled to.

    I contacted each and every representative and Senator in my state. I got two responses: 1. Peter Fitzgerald (R Senator) 2. Dick Durbin (D Senator).

    Since Fitzgerald responded first Senator Durbin’s office stepped back and let Fitzgerald’s office handle my nephews case.

    After months and months of Fitzgeralds office telling me that the Social Security office was not responding I decided to take further action without the help of my Senator.

    Knowing that a citizen cannot sue (successfully) the Social Security Administration, I took my $175 filing fee to the Small Claims Clerk and filed a lawsuit against the Social Security Administration and the caseworker who refused (or was not competent)to do his job.

    The Clerk laughed and said “your suing the Social Security Admin.?”. I replied, “yes, this should get their attention”. You are allowed to file a case, you just cant win it.

    I didn’t go to the assigned court appearance and left the matter to the Justice Dept. After the Justice Dept. filed about 8 motions to dispose of the case, the case was dismissed.

    I have in my possession 4 inches of legal paperwork from the justice dept and it only cost me $175.

    The Social Security Administration decided to review my nephews case and proceeded to pay all monies due to him.

    If taking on the Social Security administration isn’t huge then I don’t know what is. Justice was served. It’s not about fortune.

    Know the rules before you play the game.


  40. Ryan Neat Says:

    Susan,

    I’d be more likely to sue the justice department than halliburton. Corporations tend to have more resourced allocated for lawsuits, and they tend to hire vengeful corporate lawyers.

    I’m not denying lawsuits can work, but I’ve had very different experiences than yours…


  41. Ryan Neat Says:

    Great article on the stealing of the last 3 elections. They trash the new carter/baker report for its utter failure to recognize the systemic failures in the system.

    http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/092005G.shtml


  42. brain-noogie Says:

    Government is supposed to be there for the people…that is its job. Corporations are there to make themselves money..most of them at any cost. We are seeing when the two merge into one….the people are secondary, cannon fodder, guinea pigs for EPA testing and all at the worship of the all mighty dollar to make a few rich beyond imagination for most of us. It reeks and it must fell like it did prior to the storming of the Bastille. Our nation is dieing from within. Crazy to watch it happen.


  43. This side of the pond Says:

    Can anyone from your side of the pond make head or tail of the riveting “Basra drama” that’s topping headlines here in the U.K…? Keen to know your perspective …

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/4263648.stm


  44. WiscoDuk Says:

    #43

    Strange things happen in a civil war. I’ve stated this before. The people of Iraq hate Westerners (especially the US and UK.) Period. In many cases…for good reason. Who do you think were the victims of repressive sanctions? Saddam? Hardly.

    “The enemy of my enemy is my friend” scenario never lasts long. The Westerners are infidels occupying a Muslim country in EVERY Iraqis eyes.


  45. Spudge-Boy Says:

    I would add that both Iraq and Afghanistan have asked the “occupying forces” to leave. They both used the term occupying forces. That is important as the Bush administration has stated a number of times that we are not occupying those countries.

    It doesn’t matter how many times Bushco states that we are not occupying a country, if the governments (that we put in place) feel they are being occupied.

    Have you ever had one of those “friends that wouldn’t leave” (al la Saturday Night Live)?

    The US is the friend that wouldn’t leave.

    #43 you can replace US with Coalition Forces and this post means the same thing.


  46. Marie Says:

    #43 Our press is too preoccupied with the approaching storm. One would think that with 24/7 news channels, we would be among the best-informed public in the world, but you would be wrong. Our press panders to the least of us who would watch American Idol and Survivor 24/7 if given a chance.
    I did see a teensy article about this in the paper, but it was incoherent and didn’t enlighten me as to what happened or why.


  47. buy cipro Says:

    buy cipro

    centipede unspeakable!bitumen Kumar tropic abates!accumulating antibiotic zithromax http://www.real-estate-shop.com/antibiotic-zithromax.html


  48. Ass Thick Ass Babes Kick Ass Says:

    Ass Thick Ass Babes Kick Ass

    I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view


  49. Gay Sex Gay Ass Gay Ass Says:

    Gay Sex Gay Ass Gay Ass

    I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view


  50. Distance Learning Colleges Deck Plans Says:

    Distance Learning Colleges Deck Plans

    I didn’t agree with you first, but last paragraph makes sense for me


  51. Abdul Says:

    Abdul

    our life of tomorrow: Our life is the creation of our mind.


  52. Pet Adoption Pet Classifieds Pet Beds Says:

    Pet Adoption Pet Classifieds Pet Beds

    I didn’t agree with you first, but last paragraph makes sense for me



Jump to Top

About Think Progress | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy (off-site) | RSS | Donate
© 2005-2008 Center for American Progress Action Fund
View Most Popular

Advertisement


Visit Our Affiliated Site

image image
What We're About

Featured

image
Subscribe to the Progress Report




Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.

Name:
Email:
Tip:
(required)



Reports

imageTopic Cloud


imageArchives


imageBlog Roll