Isn’t Kristol, in his uniquely effeminate way, stating he abhors conducting criminalization of things like blowjobs of ploiticians? But didn’t then when it was occuring to Clinton?

So, Kristol is a hypocrite, as well as a dyslexic labeller.

This is precisely what is illustrated in 9-11 on Trial, a book that shreds the government’s official story – and credibility – beyond repair. Did you know, for instance, that never before in the history of the world has a steel building collapsed due to fire? Yet on 9-11, three of them did just that in seven hours – with WTC 7 not even being hit by an airliner.

Furthermore, it takes a temperature of 2,795 degrees to melt construction grade steel, yet the highest temperature jet fuel can reach is 1,517 degrees. Plus, all the jet fuel burned off within two minutes of the towers being struck, while two independent studies proved that the fires within each tower never rose above 500-600 degrees. In fact, FEMA revealed in their final report that, “The heat produced by burning jet fuel does not by itself appear to have been sufficient to initiate the structural collapse.”

Also, the WTC towers were designed to withstand the impact from a Boeing 707 (similar to a Boeing 767), and each floor was designed to hold 2,600,000 pounds beyond its own weight. Likewise, the steel used in these structures was rated to hold five-times its normal load. MIT professor Thomas Eager admitted as much when declaring, “The impact of the airplanes would have been insignificant” in toppling the towers.

Also, how do we explain the pools of molten steel which were found bubbling 70 feet beneath the towers five weeks after 9-11? Incidentally, a temperature of 5,182 degrees is needed to transform steel into a liquefied state. Do you think fires that FEMA admitted “would have burned at, or below, temperatures typical in office fires” could have produced such extremes? Even NYFD audiotapes of firefighters who reached the South tower’s impact point reveal that they “judged the blazes to be manageable” and were easily extinguishable in less than an hour.

Even more interesting is the South Tower. Even though it experienced a less forceful hit than the North Tower and had smaller fires, it fell in only half the time of its counterpart (56 minutes). It takes five-times that long to cook a turkey! Plus, the South Tower’s cap, which initially tipped 23 degrees past vertical, suddenly reversed direction, then dropped vertically, defying Newton’s First Law of Motion.

Most incriminating, though, is the resistance-free speed (a mere 10 seconds) at which the towers collapsed. To put this matter into perspective, if you were standing atop the WTC towers, and at the precise moment when they began to fall you dropped a football over the side, you and the football would have hit the ground at nearly the exact same moment. In other words, 200,000 tons of steel, 425,000 cubic yards of concrete, and all the walls, desks and floors provided no resistance whatsoever. Not only does such a collapse defy Galileo’s Law of Falling Bodies, it is physically impossible unless all resistance was removed via a controlled demolition.

Of course there’s more (seismographic data, the ridiculous pancake & truss-bolt theories, and the complete vaporization of nearly all the concrete into a fine microscopic dust), but I’ll close with this question: considering that 9-11 was the most traumatic event of the 21st century, if there was even a one-percent chance that the government’s official story was false, shouldn’t we do everything humanly possible to discover what the truth ultimately is? Because, if the search for truth and justice doesn’t matter to us in regard to 9-11, what does?

They should be indicted on this, but there should be a strong link and hook into the crooked 9/11 conspiracy.

Fitzgerald has an opportunity here to re-constitute the American Republic! With nothing but the truth.

A good guess might be someone delusional enough and dedicated enough to neoconism that they would see this as justified. Someone like our UN ambassador JOhn Bolton, he was also accused of hyping threats posed by Syria at his previous job, or possibly Douglas Fieth or someone close to him in the WHIG propaganda dept. After all WHIG was in the business of producing false information.(see curveball and ahmed chalabi)

The bush admin has no respect for the rule of law and democracy. Look at the 2000 “election”, outing a CIA agent and her front company for political reasons. Look at how they pass legislation.(see 2005 hwy and trnsprtn bill also largest pork bill ever, and CAFTA) No respect for democracy and law and order. They will not let criminal convictions stop them.

Take a look at my website and you will quickly see that 911 was an inside job, and couldn’t have been otherwise.

How long before those who conspired against America on 911 be brought to Justice? For crying out loud, is all one has to do is slow down the footage and one can easily see all the issues with what is alleged to have been Flight 175. Keep watching and one can see for themselves all the bombs going off in the World Trade Center. This coincides with the Firemans transcripts released, where they were recorded saying as much; “Bombs going off on 23″ “A large Explosion in the Sub Basement of the North Tower” “It’s like they put detonators in our buildings, you could see the floors popping out, floor by floor, boom, boom, boom”, etc….

911 was an inside job and a day of High Treason. And is a little more important than the Vaerlie Plame indictment. If you don’t like the ‘criminalization of Politics’ then we need to get the criminals out of politics, and all that that implies….

Sincerely,
Phil Jayhan
Founder -
http://www.letsroll911.org

“Has anyone ever investigated and learned who forged the documents claiming that Saddam Hussein tried to obtain yellowcake from Niger?”

I had read soimewhere that the forgeries were produced by Italian intelligence, but can’t state that as fact.

The question I have, is why send an outsider with integrity to investigate the evidence? Does that sound like this administration’s MO? No one from the Office of Special Plans or AIPAC available? Seems like a real risk to send someone like Wilson to wreck the centerpiece on the Iraq WMD justification…especially if you knew the docs were forgeries to begin with. Why would Italian intel have motivation to develop these forgeries in the 1st place?

I think this was an elaborate scheme to oust Plame from her CIA job and they used the cover of political revenge to get it done.

Comment by Ryan Neat

That’s probably true. I change my name alot, but not because I’m embarassed by the facts. LOL!