<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Senators Demand Dobson &amp; Rove Reveal Details Of &#8220;Confidential&#8221; Miers Conversation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/09/rove-dobson-miers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/09/rove-dobson-miers/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 09:55:26 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Consolidation Loan</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/09/rove-dobson-miers/comment-page-1/#comment-4828218</link>
		<dc:creator>Consolidation Loan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 12:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=2129#comment-4828218</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Consolidation Loan&lt;/strong&gt;

Basic consolidation services debt loan advice that lends essential debt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Consolidation Loan</strong></p>
<p>Basic consolidation services debt loan advice that lends essential debt.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=4828218', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cash Advance Loans</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/09/rove-dobson-miers/comment-page-1/#comment-4787126</link>
		<dc:creator>Cash Advance Loans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 11:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=2129#comment-4787126</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Cash Advance Loans&lt;/strong&gt;

Instant cash advance can be a nice and convenient choice to cash flow advocate on the internet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Cash Advance Loans</strong></p>
<p>Instant cash advance can be a nice and convenient choice to cash flow advocate on the internet.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=4787126', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rorie</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/09/rove-dobson-miers/comment-page-1/#comment-4768426</link>
		<dc:creator>Rorie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 12:14:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=2129#comment-4768426</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Rorie&lt;/strong&gt;

Did you get this off MSN?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Rorie</strong></p>
<p>Did you get this off MSN?<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=4768426', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: family dependence advice relationship</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/09/rove-dobson-miers/comment-page-1/#comment-4675366</link>
		<dc:creator>family dependence advice relationship</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 13:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=2129#comment-4675366</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;family dependence advice relationship&lt;/strong&gt;

relationship advice and sex</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>family dependence advice relationship</strong></p>
<p>relationship advice and sex<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=4675366', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: porno video</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/09/rove-dobson-miers/comment-page-1/#comment-4510726</link>
		<dc:creator>porno video</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 11:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=2129#comment-4510726</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;porno video&lt;/strong&gt;

Of Michigan,Ann Arbor discussed the endoscope in early 50&#039;s. When fully recovered, the patient will be instructed when to resume his/her</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>porno video</strong></p>
<p>Of Michigan,Ann Arbor discussed the endoscope in early 50&#8217;s. When fully recovered, the patient will be instructed when to resume his/her<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=4510726', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tail -f /dev/mind &#187; The Miers nomination is mired</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/09/rove-dobson-miers/comment-page-1/#comment-182007</link>
		<dc:creator>tail -f /dev/mind &#187; The Miers nomination is mired</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2005 16:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=2129#comment-182007</guid>
		<description>[...] Senators become suspicious of any assurances offered to Dobson and others and consider issuing supoenas for Dobson&#8217;s testimony (and others&#8217;). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Senators become suspicious of any assurances offered to Dobson and others and consider issuing supoenas for Dobson&#8217;s testimony (and others&#8217;). [...]<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=182007', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred Washington</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/09/rove-dobson-miers/comment-page-1/#comment-171879</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred Washington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2005 14:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=2129#comment-171879</guid>
		<description>You idiots really do represent the worst of liberal America.  The truth about 90% of liberals is that while they spout off about their tolerance for all people and lifestyle choices, they are really the most close-minded of all.  As for Ryan Neat, it&#039;s interesting that you take someone else&#039;s argument and twist it around to say that he/she supports murder, child pornography, and a state-sponsored religion.  What post were you reading?  The argument was that just as Christians should not be able to legislate against everything they find offensive and against their beliefs, so too, atheists, muslims, agnostics, libertarians, buddhists, and christian scientists shouldn&#039;t be able to legislate through the court system against everything that is contrary to their beliefs or way of thinking.  Also, as to the argument that the court system should treat the constitution as a general vague guideline subject to a judge&#039;s personal feelings on the issue--could you show me exactly where in the Constitution segregation was established?  I didn&#039;t know the supreme court used white out on the Constitution when they used a decision to overturn a practice that was completely against the literal interpretation of the constitution--i.e. your religion, race, hair color, etc. does not prevent you from enjoying the same rights/privileges as everyone else living in our country.  I would think you liberal idiots would agree in the face of two more conservative judges taking supreme court seats soon, that appointed officials should not be given the power to amend the constitution and overturn laws that were voted on by ELECTED officials. But then again, what does my opinion matter, if I disagree with you, I must be a racist, Christian, child molesting pervert.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You idiots really do represent the worst of liberal America.  The truth about 90% of liberals is that while they spout off about their tolerance for all people and lifestyle choices, they are really the most close-minded of all.  As for Ryan Neat, it&#8217;s interesting that you take someone else&#8217;s argument and twist it around to say that he/she supports murder, child pornography, and a state-sponsored religion.  What post were you reading?  The argument was that just as Christians should not be able to legislate against everything they find offensive and against their beliefs, so too, atheists, muslims, agnostics, libertarians, buddhists, and christian scientists shouldn&#8217;t be able to legislate through the court system against everything that is contrary to their beliefs or way of thinking.  Also, as to the argument that the court system should treat the constitution as a general vague guideline subject to a judge&#8217;s personal feelings on the issue&#8211;could you show me exactly where in the Constitution segregation was established?  I didn&#8217;t know the supreme court used white out on the Constitution when they used a decision to overturn a practice that was completely against the literal interpretation of the constitution&#8211;i.e. your religion, race, hair color, etc. does not prevent you from enjoying the same rights/privileges as everyone else living in our country.  I would think you liberal idiots would agree in the face of two more conservative judges taking supreme court seats soon, that appointed officials should not be given the power to amend the constitution and overturn laws that were voted on by ELECTED officials. But then again, what does my opinion matter, if I disagree with you, I must be a racist, Christian, child molesting pervert.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=171879', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mysticagent</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/09/rove-dobson-miers/comment-page-1/#comment-167875</link>
		<dc:creator>mysticagent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2005 18:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=2129#comment-167875</guid>
		<description>Mighty Aphrodite
    (sorry, off topic) Descartes was a Catholic (though after his death the Roman Catholic Church put his books on the &quot;forbidden Reading&quot; list).  His philosophical approach (and the one that derived, &quot;I think therefore I am.&quot;) was to doubt EVERYTHING.  Question all things, to include the evidence of your senses. Did you mean &quot;Pascal&quot;? (As in &quot;Pascal&#039;s Wager&quot;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mighty Aphrodite<br />
    (sorry, off topic) Descartes was a Catholic (though after his death the Roman Catholic Church put his books on the &#8220;forbidden Reading&#8221; list).  His philosophical approach (and the one that derived, &#8220;I think therefore I am.&#8221;) was to doubt EVERYTHING.  Question all things, to include the evidence of your senses. Did you mean &#8220;Pascal&#8221;? (As in &#8220;Pascal&#8217;s Wager&#8221;)<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=167875', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Muse</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/09/rove-dobson-miers/comment-page-1/#comment-167549</link>
		<dc:creator>The Muse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2005 16:46:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=2129#comment-167549</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s what has the Right&#039;s panties in a bunch:

Today on Eyewitness Muse, a scientific shocker: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eyewitnessmuse.com/musings.php?p=163&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Study: Euthanizing Right-wing Pundits would Solve Global Warming&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s what has the Right&#8217;s panties in a bunch:</p>
<p>Today on Eyewitness Muse, a scientific shocker: <a href="http://www.eyewitnessmuse.com/musings.php?p=163" rel="nofollow">Study: Euthanizing Right-wing Pundits would Solve Global Warming</a><a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=167549', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mighty aphrodite</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/09/rove-dobson-miers/comment-page-1/#comment-167532</link>
		<dc:creator>mighty aphrodite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2005 16:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=2129#comment-167532</guid>
		<description>Atheists and Humanists - believe what you want - go where the &quot;evidence&quot; points you.  My favourite &quot;recovering&quot; atheist was the mathematician, Descartes.  Now that guy knew how to hedge his bets!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Atheists and Humanists &#8211; believe what you want &#8211; go where the &#8220;evidence&#8221; points you.  My favourite &#8220;recovering&#8221; atheist was the mathematician, Descartes.  Now that guy knew how to hedge his bets!<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=167532', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: truth4achange</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/09/rove-dobson-miers/comment-page-1/#comment-167495</link>
		<dc:creator>truth4achange</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2005 16:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=2129#comment-167495</guid>
		<description>Anybody besides me starting to wonder whether there&#039;s more than meets the eye to the &#039;relationship&#039; between the President and his nominee? Some absurd speculation here: http://www.hairytruth.blogspot.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anybody besides me starting to wonder whether there&#8217;s more than meets the eye to the &#8216;relationship&#8217; between the President and his nominee? Some absurd speculation here: <a href="http://www.hairytruth.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.hairytruth.blogspot.com</a><a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=167495', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slingshot.org</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/09/rove-dobson-miers/comment-page-1/#comment-167334</link>
		<dc:creator>Slingshot.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2005 08:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=2129#comment-167334</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Lobbyists for Christ&lt;/strong&gt;

The Boston Globe occasionally publishes impressive series on the DC political process.  Last Octoberâ€™s series on corporate lobbying actually inspired me to start looking into these issues in greater detail, indirectly leading to this blog. Itâ€™s har...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Lobbyists for Christ</strong></p>
<p>The Boston Globe occasionally publishes impressive series on the DC political process.  Last Octoberâ€™s series on corporate lobbying actually inspired me to start looking into these issues in greater detail, indirectly leading to this blog. Itâ€™s har&#8230;<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=167334', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Rupel</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/09/rove-dobson-miers/comment-page-1/#comment-167318</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Rupel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2005 07:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=2129#comment-167318</guid>
		<description>Republicans = Hypocrisy.

Republicans lie, cheat, steal... Let&#039;s think back to a few examples of just THE LAST FIVE YEARS...

-- Rush Limbaugh says all drug users should be put in jail... yet WON&#039;T go to jail after being proven a drug addict.

-- Tom DeLay trumpets he represents the &quot;good morals&quot; of America, but has been charged with crime, after crime, after crime, after crime.  He never says he didn&#039;t do the crime, just that the charges are unfounded.  Nice and slimy.  Isnt&#039; that what Nixon said?

-- Bill Frist, another &quot;moral-ist&quot; who has shamed others for their acts, but doesn&#039;t seem to be smart enough to understand that &quot;insider trading&quot; is a federal crime.  (Either that, or he&#039;s just another Republican liar.)

-- Dick Cheney.  Okay, c&#039;mon... even to the reddest of you red state people.  How can you support this guy?  How many billions of dollars does this man&#039;s former companies have to bilk out of our country in overinflated prices before it offends you?  Iraq not bad enough?  Does it honestly not sicken you that Cheney&#039;s &quot;buddies&quot; have already overcharged us for New Orleans clean-up?  (And for you dullards, yes, that means YOU will be paying for all of that with your taxes.)

-- James Dobson.  Do you really think our forefathers gave up their lives so some preacher could whisper innuendo about a Supreme Court justice?  

Seriously, Republicans... how can you even begin to stomach your party?  

And if that&#039;s not enough, for all of you that still love Bush, but aren&#039;t in the .0005% that is actually benefitting from his policies -- how much has Bush put into your retirement account?

Fill up your gas tank, read the paper and learn a little about the latest numbers of brave soliders who have died in Iraq, and then please, extoll his virtues.

I dare you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republicans = Hypocrisy.</p>
<p>Republicans lie, cheat, steal&#8230; Let&#8217;s think back to a few examples of just THE LAST FIVE YEARS&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8211; Rush Limbaugh says all drug users should be put in jail&#8230; yet WON&#8217;T go to jail after being proven a drug addict.</p>
<p>&#8211; Tom DeLay trumpets he represents the &#8220;good morals&#8221; of America, but has been charged with crime, after crime, after crime, after crime.  He never says he didn&#8217;t do the crime, just that the charges are unfounded.  Nice and slimy.  Isnt&#8217; that what Nixon said?</p>
<p>&#8211; Bill Frist, another &#8220;moral-ist&#8221; who has shamed others for their acts, but doesn&#8217;t seem to be smart enough to understand that &#8220;insider trading&#8221; is a federal crime.  (Either that, or he&#8217;s just another Republican liar.)</p>
<p>&#8211; Dick Cheney.  Okay, c&#8217;mon&#8230; even to the reddest of you red state people.  How can you support this guy?  How many billions of dollars does this man&#8217;s former companies have to bilk out of our country in overinflated prices before it offends you?  Iraq not bad enough?  Does it honestly not sicken you that Cheney&#8217;s &#8220;buddies&#8221; have already overcharged us for New Orleans clean-up?  (And for you dullards, yes, that means YOU will be paying for all of that with your taxes.)</p>
<p>&#8211; James Dobson.  Do you really think our forefathers gave up their lives so some preacher could whisper innuendo about a Supreme Court justice?  </p>
<p>Seriously, Republicans&#8230; how can you even begin to stomach your party?  </p>
<p>And if that&#8217;s not enough, for all of you that still love Bush, but aren&#8217;t in the .0005% that is actually benefitting from his policies &#8212; how much has Bush put into your retirement account?</p>
<p>Fill up your gas tank, read the paper and learn a little about the latest numbers of brave soliders who have died in Iraq, and then please, extoll his virtues.</p>
<p>I dare you.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=167318', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/09/rove-dobson-miers/comment-page-1/#comment-166963</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2005 01:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=2129#comment-166963</guid>
		<description>I agree Pablo.  Dobson does not deserve an opinion in this matter.  He will do nothing but lie anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree Pablo.  Dobson does not deserve an opinion in this matter.  He will do nothing but lie anyway.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=166963', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/09/rove-dobson-miers/comment-page-1/#comment-166962</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2005 01:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=2129#comment-166962</guid>
		<description>Tread carefully on this Miers nomination.  If the pugs are saying they dont like her then it is safe to assume that they love her.

This could be a ploy for a quick confirmation.  We know she&#039;s a right wing extremist or she wouldnt be friends with Bushie.  

Don&#039;t confirm Dems,  the pugs are using reverse pyschology on this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tread carefully on this Miers nomination.  If the pugs are saying they dont like her then it is safe to assume that they love her.</p>
<p>This could be a ploy for a quick confirmation.  We know she&#8217;s a right wing extremist or she wouldnt be friends with Bushie.  </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t confirm Dems,  the pugs are using reverse pyschology on this one.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=166962', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pablo in Mexico</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/09/rove-dobson-miers/comment-page-1/#comment-166884</link>
		<dc:creator>Pablo in Mexico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2005 21:38:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=2129#comment-166884</guid>
		<description>This calling on Dobson by the democrats can, and will, backfire on them.

For that very reason wingnuttia, knowing the above, will call Dobson to the committee.

How can it backfire?

About 30 of the 55 resucknic wingnut pukes are disciples of Dobson. They love and adore the nut. They are on his mailing lists, his e-mail lists, they take his phone calls day and night. They donaate money to him because, my dear folks, they know that their fate as a senator lies in his hands. 

Oh I know, he opposed Specter and it did not work. But folks, Specter is from a blue state. I am talking about the red-state senators, you know, the ones that are the real crooks in this country. You know, the alkys in the Senate. You know, the ones who go to bed at night thinking about molesting little girls and playing with their little chi-chis. Those senators just absolutely adore Dobson, for their own selfish reasons. They, along with Dobson, then go out on the weekends and rent porno movies.

Dobsons appearance at the committee will only give backbone to the theocratic ignoramouses from the south.
For that reason, I think it will backfire on the dems if they are the ones who brings nut Dobson in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This calling on Dobson by the democrats can, and will, backfire on them.</p>
<p>For that very reason wingnuttia, knowing the above, will call Dobson to the committee.</p>
<p>How can it backfire?</p>
<p>About 30 of the 55 resucknic wingnut pukes are disciples of Dobson. They love and adore the nut. They are on his mailing lists, his e-mail lists, they take his phone calls day and night. They donaate money to him because, my dear folks, they know that their fate as a senator lies in his hands. </p>
<p>Oh I know, he opposed Specter and it did not work. But folks, Specter is from a blue state. I am talking about the red-state senators, you know, the ones that are the real crooks in this country. You know, the alkys in the Senate. You know, the ones who go to bed at night thinking about molesting little girls and playing with their little chi-chis. Those senators just absolutely adore Dobson, for their own selfish reasons. They, along with Dobson, then go out on the weekends and rent porno movies.</p>
<p>Dobsons appearance at the committee will only give backbone to the theocratic ignoramouses from the south.<br />
For that reason, I think it will backfire on the dems if they are the ones who brings nut Dobson in.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=166884', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Neat</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/09/rove-dobson-miers/comment-page-1/#comment-166851</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Neat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2005 20:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=2129#comment-166851</guid>
		<description>And while we&#039;re on the constitution.

The First Amendment
&quot;Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion...&quot;
 
Article VI, Section 3
&quot;...no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.&quot;

From Jefferson&#039;s biography:
&quot;...an amendment was proposed by inserting the words, &#039;Jesus Christ...the holy author of our religion,&#039; which was rejected &#039;By a great majority in proof that they meant to comprehend, within the mantle of its protection, the Jew and the Gentile, the Christian and the Mohammedan, the Hindoo and the Infidel of every denomination.&#039;&quot;

Jefferson&#039;s &quot;The Statute of Virginia for Religious Freedom&quot;:
&quot;Our civil rights have no dependence on our religious opinions, more than on our opinions in physics and geometry....The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. But it does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods, or no god. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.&quot;

Additional quotes from Thomas Jefferson:
&quot;It is error alone which needs the support of government. Truth can stand by itself.&quot;
 
&quot;They [the clergy] believe that any portion of power confided to me, will be exerted in opposition of their schemes. And they believe rightly: for I have sworn upon the alter of god eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.&quot;
 
&quot;I have examined all the known superstitions of the world, and I do not find in our particular superstition of Christianity one redeeming feature. They are all alike founded on fables and mythology. Millions of innocent men, women and children, since the introduction of Christianity, have been burnt, tortured, fined and imprisoned. What has been the effect of this coercion? To make one half of the world fools and the other half hypocrites; to support roguery and error all over the earth.&quot;
 
&quot;In every country and in every age the priest has been hostile to liberty; he is always in alliance with the despot, abetting his abuses in return for protection to his own.&quot;
 
&quot;Fix reason firmly in her seat, and call to her tribunal every fact, every opinion. Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason, than that of blindfolded fear....Do not be frightened from this inquiry by any fear of its consequences. If it end in a belief that there is no God, you will find incitements to virtue on the comfort and pleasantness you feel in its exercise and in the love of others which it will procure for you.&quot;
 
&quot;Christianity...[has become] the most perverted system that ever shone on man....Rogueries, absurdities and untruths were perpetrated upon the teachings of Jesus by a large band of dupes and importers led by Paul, the first great corrupter of the teaching of Jesus.&quot;
 
&quot;...that our civil rights have no dependence on religious opinions, any more than our opinions in physics and geometry.&quot;
 
 
James Madison (the fourth President of the United States)

Memorial and Remonstrance Against Religious Assessments:
&quot;Religious bondage shackles and debilitates the mind and unfits it for every noble enterprise....During almost fifteen centuries has the legal establishment of Christianity been on trial. What have been its fruits? More or less, in all places, pride and indolence in the clergy; ignorance and servility in laity; in both, superstition, bigotry, and persecution.&quot;
 
Additional quote from James Madison:
&quot;Religion and government will both exist in greater purity, the less they are mixed together.&quot;
 
 
Benjamin Franklin

From Franklin&#039;s autobiography, p. 66:
&quot;My parents had given me betimes religious impressions, and I received from my infancy a pious education in the principles of Calvinism. But scarcely was I arrived at fifteen years of age, when, after having doubted in turn of different tenets, according as I found them combated in the different books that I read, I began to doubt of Revelation itself.&quot;
 
From Franklin&#039;s autobiography, p. 66:
&quot;...Some books against Deism fell into my hands....It happened that they wrought an effect on me quite contrary to what was intended by them; for the arguments of the Deists, which were quote to be refuted, appeared to me much stronger than the refutations, in short, I soon became a thorough Deist.&quot;
 
 
Thomas Paine

From The Age of Reason, pp. 89:
&quot;I do not believe in the creed professed by the Jewish church, by the Roman church, by the Greek church, by the Turkish church, by the Protestant church, nor by any church that I know of....Each of those churches accuse the other of unbelief; and of my own part, I disbelieve them all.&quot;
 
From The Age of Reason:
&quot;All natural institutions of churches, whether Jewish, Christian, or Turkish, appear to me no other than human inventions, set up to terrify and enslave mankind, and monopolize power and profit.&quot;
 
From The Age of Reason:
&quot;The most detestable wickedness, the most horrid cruelties, and the greatest miseries that have afflicted the human race have had their origin in this thing called revelation, or revealed religion.&quot;
 
From The Age of Reason:
&quot;What is it the Bible teaches us? -- rapine, cruelty, and murder.&quot;
 
From The Age of Reason:
&quot;Loving of enemies is another dogma of feigned morality, and has beside no meaning....Those who preach the doctrine of loving their enemies are in general the greatest prosecutors, and they act consistently by so doing; for the doctrine is hypocritical, and it is natural that hypocrisy should act the reverse of what it preaches.&quot;
 
From The Age of Reason:
&quot;The Bible was established altogether by the sword, and that in the worst use of it -- not to terrify but to extirpate.&quot;
 
Additional quote from Thomas Paine:
&quot;It is the duty of every true Deist to vindicate the moral justice of God against the evils of the Bible.&quot;
 
 
Ethan Allen

From Religion of the American Enlightenment:
&quot;Denominated a Deist, the reality of which I have never disputed, being conscious that I am no Christian.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And while we&#8217;re on the constitution.</p>
<p>The First Amendment<br />
&#8220;Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Article VI, Section 3<br />
&#8220;&#8230;no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.&#8221;</p>
<p>From Jefferson&#8217;s biography:<br />
&#8220;&#8230;an amendment was proposed by inserting the words, &#8216;Jesus Christ&#8230;the holy author of our religion,&#8217; which was rejected &#8216;By a great majority in proof that they meant to comprehend, within the mantle of its protection, the Jew and the Gentile, the Christian and the Mohammedan, the Hindoo and the Infidel of every denomination.&#8217;&#8221;</p>
<p>Jefferson&#8217;s &#8220;The Statute of Virginia for Religious Freedom&#8221;:<br />
&#8220;Our civil rights have no dependence on our religious opinions, more than on our opinions in physics and geometry&#8230;.The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. But it does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods, or no god. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.&#8221;</p>
<p>Additional quotes from Thomas Jefferson:<br />
&#8220;It is error alone which needs the support of government. Truth can stand by itself.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;They [the clergy] believe that any portion of power confided to me, will be exerted in opposition of their schemes. And they believe rightly: for I have sworn upon the alter of god eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;I have examined all the known superstitions of the world, and I do not find in our particular superstition of Christianity one redeeming feature. They are all alike founded on fables and mythology. Millions of innocent men, women and children, since the introduction of Christianity, have been burnt, tortured, fined and imprisoned. What has been the effect of this coercion? To make one half of the world fools and the other half hypocrites; to support roguery and error all over the earth.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;In every country and in every age the priest has been hostile to liberty; he is always in alliance with the despot, abetting his abuses in return for protection to his own.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Fix reason firmly in her seat, and call to her tribunal every fact, every opinion. Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason, than that of blindfolded fear&#8230;.Do not be frightened from this inquiry by any fear of its consequences. If it end in a belief that there is no God, you will find incitements to virtue on the comfort and pleasantness you feel in its exercise and in the love of others which it will procure for you.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Christianity&#8230;[has become] the most perverted system that ever shone on man&#8230;.Rogueries, absurdities and untruths were perpetrated upon the teachings of Jesus by a large band of dupes and importers led by Paul, the first great corrupter of the teaching of Jesus.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;that our civil rights have no dependence on religious opinions, any more than our opinions in physics and geometry.&#8221;</p>
<p>James Madison (the fourth President of the United States)</p>
<p>Memorial and Remonstrance Against Religious Assessments:<br />
&#8220;Religious bondage shackles and debilitates the mind and unfits it for every noble enterprise&#8230;.During almost fifteen centuries has the legal establishment of Christianity been on trial. What have been its fruits? More or less, in all places, pride and indolence in the clergy; ignorance and servility in laity; in both, superstition, bigotry, and persecution.&#8221;</p>
<p>Additional quote from James Madison:<br />
&#8220;Religion and government will both exist in greater purity, the less they are mixed together.&#8221;</p>
<p>Benjamin Franklin</p>
<p>From Franklin&#8217;s autobiography, p. 66:<br />
&#8220;My parents had given me betimes religious impressions, and I received from my infancy a pious education in the principles of Calvinism. But scarcely was I arrived at fifteen years of age, when, after having doubted in turn of different tenets, according as I found them combated in the different books that I read, I began to doubt of Revelation itself.&#8221;</p>
<p>From Franklin&#8217;s autobiography, p. 66:<br />
&#8220;&#8230;Some books against Deism fell into my hands&#8230;.It happened that they wrought an effect on me quite contrary to what was intended by them; for the arguments of the Deists, which were quote to be refuted, appeared to me much stronger than the refutations, in short, I soon became a thorough Deist.&#8221;</p>
<p>Thomas Paine</p>
<p>From The Age of Reason, pp. 89:<br />
&#8220;I do not believe in the creed professed by the Jewish church, by the Roman church, by the Greek church, by the Turkish church, by the Protestant church, nor by any church that I know of&#8230;.Each of those churches accuse the other of unbelief; and of my own part, I disbelieve them all.&#8221;</p>
<p>From The Age of Reason:<br />
&#8220;All natural institutions of churches, whether Jewish, Christian, or Turkish, appear to me no other than human inventions, set up to terrify and enslave mankind, and monopolize power and profit.&#8221;</p>
<p>From The Age of Reason:<br />
&#8220;The most detestable wickedness, the most horrid cruelties, and the greatest miseries that have afflicted the human race have had their origin in this thing called revelation, or revealed religion.&#8221;</p>
<p>From The Age of Reason:<br />
&#8220;What is it the Bible teaches us? &#8212; rapine, cruelty, and murder.&#8221;</p>
<p>From The Age of Reason:<br />
&#8220;Loving of enemies is another dogma of feigned morality, and has beside no meaning&#8230;.Those who preach the doctrine of loving their enemies are in general the greatest prosecutors, and they act consistently by so doing; for the doctrine is hypocritical, and it is natural that hypocrisy should act the reverse of what it preaches.&#8221;</p>
<p>From The Age of Reason:<br />
&#8220;The Bible was established altogether by the sword, and that in the worst use of it &#8212; not to terrify but to extirpate.&#8221;</p>
<p>Additional quote from Thomas Paine:<br />
&#8220;It is the duty of every true Deist to vindicate the moral justice of God against the evils of the Bible.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ethan Allen</p>
<p>From Religion of the American Enlightenment:<br />
&#8220;Denominated a Deist, the reality of which I have never disputed, being conscious that I am no Christian.&#8221;<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=166851', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Neat</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/09/rove-dobson-miers/comment-page-1/#comment-166826</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Neat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2005 20:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=2129#comment-166826</guid>
		<description>&quot;Iâ€™d settle for a â€œcontitutionalâ€ Constitution - not a â€œhocus-pocusâ€ one. How about a contitutional ruling that does NOT promote a particular religion - BUT does not oppose religion. (Atheists, humanists and â€˜Christianâ€™ leftists DO NOT have the right NOT to be offended!!)&quot;

And Christians do not have a right to be offended by Athiests, Humanists, Islam, Buddhism or Hinduism - and yet you are.  The problem is that like all reichwingers you are the intolerant and claim others are persecuting you.  You dominate society and when you force your religious ignorance and bigotry on others, and they resist, you say the others are the bigots.  It&#039;s stupid blind hatred on your part - but then again an offensive beast like you knows know other way.

&quot; (The left has demonstrated the tolerance needed by the majority of Americans if viewing a crucifix in urine or dung and magazine cutouts of vaginas is considered â€œartâ€.) &quot;

Why not, you wish to consider torture and murder acceptable - to me you are the truly offensive creature!

&quot;If conservatives are offended by the â€œartâ€ of shock artists, my advice is â€˜donâ€™t buy a ticketâ€™. Same goes advice for the atheists, agnostics etc. - if youâ€™re offended by a cross, menorah, crescent, etc. - get over it. &quot;

Well you&#039;re obviously offended by those who don&#039;t accept your persecution - you should get over it.  After all, can&#039;t you go to your church to find those things?  Why do you have to inflict them on me?

&quot;How about a constitution where US law is cited - rather than Euro-law? The overturning of Plessy v. Ferguson was NOT decided on the â€œnowhere to be foundâ€ but oft touted â€œright to privacyâ€. Since some folks view abortion as killing kids and others donâ€™t - perhaps we should re-think our homicide laws - some people are inconventient, incontinent or incompetent and others arenâ€™t. And if I kill an inconvenient someone in the â€œprivacy of homeâ€ is it REALLY murder??&quot;

The fact you want to justify killing anyone when you talk about needing a constitution that embraces religion shows what a right wing terrorist you really are.  You&#039;re an insane moron!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Iâ€™d settle for a â€œcontitutionalâ€ Constitution &#8211; not a â€œhocus-pocusâ€ one. How about a contitutional ruling that does NOT promote a particular religion &#8211; BUT does not oppose religion. (Atheists, humanists and â€˜Christianâ€™ leftists DO NOT have the right NOT to be offended!!)&#8221;</p>
<p>And Christians do not have a right to be offended by Athiests, Humanists, Islam, Buddhism or Hinduism &#8211; and yet you are.  The problem is that like all reichwingers you are the intolerant and claim others are persecuting you.  You dominate society and when you force your religious ignorance and bigotry on others, and they resist, you say the others are the bigots.  It&#8217;s stupid blind hatred on your part &#8211; but then again an offensive beast like you knows know other way.</p>
<p>&#8221; (The left has demonstrated the tolerance needed by the majority of Americans if viewing a crucifix in urine or dung and magazine cutouts of vaginas is considered â€œartâ€.) &#8221;</p>
<p>Why not, you wish to consider torture and murder acceptable &#8211; to me you are the truly offensive creature!</p>
<p>&#8220;If conservatives are offended by the â€œartâ€ of shock artists, my advice is â€˜donâ€™t buy a ticketâ€™. Same goes advice for the atheists, agnostics etc. &#8211; if youâ€™re offended by a cross, menorah, crescent, etc. &#8211; get over it. &#8221;</p>
<p>Well you&#8217;re obviously offended by those who don&#8217;t accept your persecution &#8211; you should get over it.  After all, can&#8217;t you go to your church to find those things?  Why do you have to inflict them on me?</p>
<p>&#8220;How about a constitution where US law is cited &#8211; rather than Euro-law? The overturning of Plessy v. Ferguson was NOT decided on the â€œnowhere to be foundâ€ but oft touted â€œright to privacyâ€. Since some folks view abortion as killing kids and others donâ€™t &#8211; perhaps we should re-think our homicide laws &#8211; some people are inconventient, incontinent or incompetent and others arenâ€™t. And if I kill an inconvenient someone in the â€œprivacy of homeâ€ is it REALLY murder??&#8221;</p>
<p>The fact you want to justify killing anyone when you talk about needing a constitution that embraces religion shows what a right wing terrorist you really are.  You&#8217;re an insane moron!<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=166826', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mighty aphrodite</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/09/rove-dobson-miers/comment-page-1/#comment-166780</link>
		<dc:creator>mighty aphrodite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2005 19:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=2129#comment-166780</guid>
		<description>#27 - LWordLover - I&#039;d settle for a &quot;contitutional&quot; Constitution - not a &quot;hocus-pocus&quot; one.  How about a contitutional ruling that does NOT promote a particular religion - BUT does not oppose religion. (Atheists, humanists and &#039;Christian&#039; leftists DO NOT have the right NOT to be offended!!) (The left has demonstrated the tolerance needed by the majority of Americans if viewing a crucifix in urine or dung and magazine cutouts of vaginas is considered &quot;art&quot;.) If conservatives are offended by the &quot;art&quot; of shock artists, my advice is &#039;don&#039;t buy a ticket&#039;.  Same goes advice for the atheists, agnostics etc. - if you&#039;re offended by a cross, menorah, crescent, etc. - get over it. How about a constitution where US law is cited - rather than Euro-law? The overturning of Plessy v. Ferguson was NOT decided on the &quot;nowhere to be found&quot; but oft touted &quot;right to privacy&quot;.  Since some folks view abortion as killing kids and others don&#039;t - perhaps we should re-think our homicide laws - some people are inconventient, incontinent or incompetent and others aren&#039;t.  And if I kill an inconvenient someone in the &quot;privacy of home&quot; is it REALLY murder??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#27 &#8211; LWordLover &#8211; I&#8217;d settle for a &#8220;contitutional&#8221; Constitution &#8211; not a &#8220;hocus-pocus&#8221; one.  How about a contitutional ruling that does NOT promote a particular religion &#8211; BUT does not oppose religion. (Atheists, humanists and &#8216;Christian&#8217; leftists DO NOT have the right NOT to be offended!!) (The left has demonstrated the tolerance needed by the majority of Americans if viewing a crucifix in urine or dung and magazine cutouts of vaginas is considered &#8220;art&#8221;.) If conservatives are offended by the &#8220;art&#8221; of shock artists, my advice is &#8216;don&#8217;t buy a ticket&#8217;.  Same goes advice for the atheists, agnostics etc. &#8211; if you&#8217;re offended by a cross, menorah, crescent, etc. &#8211; get over it. How about a constitution where US law is cited &#8211; rather than Euro-law? The overturning of Plessy v. Ferguson was NOT decided on the &#8220;nowhere to be found&#8221; but oft touted &#8220;right to privacy&#8221;.  Since some folks view abortion as killing kids and others don&#8217;t &#8211; perhaps we should re-think our homicide laws &#8211; some people are inconventient, incontinent or incompetent and others aren&#8217;t.  And if I kill an inconvenient someone in the &#8220;privacy of home&#8221; is it REALLY murder??<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=166780', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Huh?</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/09/rove-dobson-miers/comment-page-1/#comment-166650</link>
		<dc:creator>Huh?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2005 16:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=2129#comment-166650</guid>
		<description>&quot;Shaking Campus Liberalism&quot; Video

Learn How to Bring Christian Values Back on Campus

 

Order it Now

Only $23.95!

http://www.truthtellers.org/campus.html

Nice, Plunger. Sod off, bitch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Shaking Campus Liberalism&#8221; Video</p>
<p>Learn How to Bring Christian Values Back on Campus</p>
<p>Order it Now</p>
<p>Only $23.95!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.truthtellers.org/campus.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.truthtellers.org/campus.html</a></p>
<p>Nice, Plunger. Sod off, bitch.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=166650', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
