<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vice President Cheney&#8217;s Halliburton</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/11/vice-president-cheneys-halliburton/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/11/vice-president-cheneys-halliburton/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 11:09:15 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/11/vice-president-cheneys-halliburton/comment-page-1/#comment-170652</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 18:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/11/vice-president-cheneys-halliburton/#comment-170652</guid>
		<description>I do not subscribe to giving anyone a pass including Bush. My older brother did 2 years in Nam and I missed it by a year. I remember the time very well. It was so different than today. One of the primary differences was that the threat of Communism to the US was a theory that many did not accept because there had not been an attck against us or allies that had fought along our side in the past. Today, many people are of the opinion that it is a &quot;connect the dots&quot; deal. We were attacked and many Americans died. So now the threat is not a theory and that&#039;s what makes it different. Of course people will insist that Iraq had nothing to do with it. The individuals who did it are not nations but receive support from nations. So to many Americans the &#039;fight there not here&quot; policy is one they support. You have to realize that Clinton got away with a lot more than what was revealed. Janet Reno was a very good soldier and excercised her power to interfere with many aspects of investigations that preceded the Lewinsky scandal. It was wrong to pursue that one. But I think the Republicans were so frustrated by his elusiveness that they wanted him to pay for something. They truly hated the guy. Again no one should get a pass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not subscribe to giving anyone a pass including Bush. My older brother did 2 years in Nam and I missed it by a year. I remember the time very well. It was so different than today. One of the primary differences was that the threat of Communism to the US was a theory that many did not accept because there had not been an attck against us or allies that had fought along our side in the past. Today, many people are of the opinion that it is a &#8220;connect the dots&#8221; deal. We were attacked and many Americans died. So now the threat is not a theory and that&#8217;s what makes it different. Of course people will insist that Iraq had nothing to do with it. The individuals who did it are not nations but receive support from nations. So to many Americans the &#8216;fight there not here&#8221; policy is one they support. You have to realize that Clinton got away with a lot more than what was revealed. Janet Reno was a very good soldier and excercised her power to interfere with many aspects of investigations that preceded the Lewinsky scandal. It was wrong to pursue that one. But I think the Republicans were so frustrated by his elusiveness that they wanted him to pay for something. They truly hated the guy. Again no one should get a pass.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=170652', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Foulsham</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/11/vice-president-cheneys-halliburton/comment-page-1/#comment-170302</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Foulsham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 16:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/11/vice-president-cheneys-halliburton/#comment-170302</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t pretend to know the ins and outs of Clinton&#039;s presidency, nor was I a fan, but, you must admit that if what he did was bad, then this crew must be worse? And, if it WAS so bad, why then didn&#039;t &#039;W&#039; use his &#039;mandate&#039;, and his &#039;political capital&#039; to repeal these evil policies, that kept everybody working, and elicited record surpluses. I maintain that Clinton&#039;s policies had nothing to do with the 8 years of peace and prosperity, but rather the fact that all the republican were kept busy, futily and at great expense, attempting to tie him to any scandal that came along, and successfully tying him only to a blowjob from the pizza girl. If ANY of this sh*t went down during Bill&#039;s watch (Rove, Cheney, Frist, Delay..you name it) You&#039;d be calling for his head, but you all give this Draft doging half-wit that &#039;speaks with Jesus&#039; a pass. Why?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t pretend to know the ins and outs of Clinton&#8217;s presidency, nor was I a fan, but, you must admit that if what he did was bad, then this crew must be worse? And, if it WAS so bad, why then didn&#8217;t &#8216;W&#8217; use his &#8216;mandate&#8217;, and his &#8216;political capital&#8217; to repeal these evil policies, that kept everybody working, and elicited record surpluses. I maintain that Clinton&#8217;s policies had nothing to do with the 8 years of peace and prosperity, but rather the fact that all the republican were kept busy, futily and at great expense, attempting to tie him to any scandal that came along, and successfully tying him only to a blowjob from the pizza girl. If ANY of this sh*t went down during Bill&#8217;s watch (Rove, Cheney, Frist, Delay..you name it) You&#8217;d be calling for his head, but you all give this Draft doging half-wit that &#8217;speaks with Jesus&#8217; a pass. Why?<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=170302', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/11/vice-president-cheneys-halliburton/comment-page-1/#comment-169454</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 19:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/11/vice-president-cheneys-halliburton/#comment-169454</guid>
		<description>#34 Sharon that was not the point. kleptrocracy...A government characterized by rampant greed and corruption. The previous administration behaved badly for financial reasons also. In fact, they broke the law. As far as China goes I think we have a treaty of some type with Taiwan. Regarding economics China would not make that call for some time since the American consumer is helping to drive their economy as exports grow at 30% annually. As far as debt goes, when our government cuts defense and intelligence budgets drastically for 8 years and claims a great economy is deceptive given the future costs this country is incurring because of the consequences of those decisions. You can choose to not do proper maintenance on anything and enjoy better finances. But when problems manifest themselves the expense usually exceeds the cost of those regular payments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#34 Sharon that was not the point. kleptrocracy&#8230;A government characterized by rampant greed and corruption. The previous administration behaved badly for financial reasons also. In fact, they broke the law. As far as China goes I think we have a treaty of some type with Taiwan. Regarding economics China would not make that call for some time since the American consumer is helping to drive their economy as exports grow at 30% annually. As far as debt goes, when our government cuts defense and intelligence budgets drastically for 8 years and claims a great economy is deceptive given the future costs this country is incurring because of the consequences of those decisions. You can choose to not do proper maintenance on anything and enjoy better finances. But when problems manifest themselves the expense usually exceeds the cost of those regular payments.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=169454', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sharon Cox</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/11/vice-president-cheneys-halliburton/comment-page-1/#comment-169337</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharon Cox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 18:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/11/vice-president-cheneys-halliburton/#comment-169337</guid>
		<description>Off point here, Ben, why would China want to blow us up.? Incase you haven&#039;t noticed we owe them billions, thanks to Bush and his crew. All they have to do is demand payment on the notes or do a little curency exchange and we will be done under. Do&#039;s the word depression sound familier.  Get real. We are now a 3rd world country and the Bush gang has run away with all our resorses, leaving the U.S. Of A. debtors to the rest of the world, and polluted beyond repair. We are now a breath away from FUBAR.......Blessings</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Off point here, Ben, why would China want to blow us up.? Incase you haven&#8217;t noticed we owe them billions, thanks to Bush and his crew. All they have to do is demand payment on the notes or do a little curency exchange and we will be done under. Do&#8217;s the word depression sound familier.  Get real. We are now a 3rd world country and the Bush gang has run away with all our resorses, leaving the U.S. Of A. debtors to the rest of the world, and polluted beyond repair. We are now a breath away from FUBAR&#8230;&#8230;.Blessings<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=169337', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dumb Fox</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/11/vice-president-cheneys-halliburton/comment-page-1/#comment-169143</link>
		<dc:creator>Dumb Fox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 17:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/11/vice-president-cheneys-halliburton/#comment-169143</guid>
		<description>#32 - Take your point on settlement, but on a market value basis, the options are worth a whole lot more than they were a year ago. And Lautenberg&#039;s numbers are perfectly credible, IMO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#32 &#8211; Take your point on settlement, but on a market value basis, the options are worth a whole lot more than they were a year ago. And Lautenberg&#8217;s numbers are perfectly credible, IMO.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=169143', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jwb</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/11/vice-president-cheneys-halliburton/comment-page-1/#comment-169026</link>
		<dc:creator>jwb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 16:42:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/11/vice-president-cheneys-halliburton/#comment-169026</guid>
		<description>#24: these are incentive stock options.  The shares are delivered upon exercise, and the basis price for calculating gain is the strike price.  Also, taxes are due at exercise for the value less the basis, regardless if the shares are held or sold.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#24: these are incentive stock options.  The shares are delivered upon exercise, and the basis price for calculating gain is the strike price.  Also, taxes are due at exercise for the value less the basis, regardless if the shares are held or sold.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=169026', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Carter</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/11/vice-president-cheneys-halliburton/comment-page-1/#comment-168990</link>
		<dc:creator>John Carter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 16:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/11/vice-president-cheneys-halliburton/#comment-168990</guid>
		<description>Still not clear on the math.  The Raw Story article says that Cheny has 433,333 Halliburton stock options.  How is it that these options were only worth $241,498 a year ago (which I assume is the number being used to caluculate the increase in value of over 3000%)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still not clear on the math.  The Raw Story article says that Cheny has 433,333 Halliburton stock options.  How is it that these options were only worth $241,498 a year ago (which I assume is the number being used to caluculate the increase in value of over 3000%)?<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=168990', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/11/vice-president-cheneys-halliburton/comment-page-1/#comment-168978</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 15:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/11/vice-president-cheneys-halliburton/#comment-168978</guid>
		<description>Hey Mass Lib, you mean like the preceding kleptocracy? How soon one forgets. 


During 1996, U.S. policy dramatically changed for the financial and military benefit of China&#039;s military enterprises and two U.S. multinationals, Loral Space and Communications and Hughes Electronics. Loral&#039;s CEO, Bernard Schwartz, was the largest single contributor to the 1994 and 1996 Democratic campaigns, giving $275,000 to the Democrats in 1996.


The U.S. had previously barred all American companies from doing business with China Aerospace because it had made illegal missile sales to Pakistan. Col. Liu was assistant to the president of the sanctioned company and her father, General Liu, was in charge of the Chinese Army when China sold missiles to Iran and nuclear equipment to Pakistan, as well as carried on its own maneuvers to threaten Taiwan.


The Departments of Defense and State maintained that our satellite technology should be on what is known as the &quot;munitions list,&quot; the list of our most sensitive military and intelligence-gathering technology. Defense and State argued that commercial satellites carry technological secrets that can jeopardize &quot;significant military and intelligence interests.&quot;


Over the protests of Defense and State, Clinton personally reversed our policy and transferred jurisdiction over these exports from the State Department to Commerce Secretary Ron Brown. This let the technology transfer go forward and allowed U.S. civilian communications satellites to be launched by Colonel Liu&#039;s China Aerospace.


The chronology is interesting. Clinton&#039;s decision to approve the rocket and satellite technology transfer was announced on March 14, 1996, but the actual change was delayed until the fall. The campaign contributions arrived in the interim.


Another powerful government-owned enterprise that benefited from Clinton&#039;s China policy was China International Trade and Investment Corporation. Clinton signed waivers allowing the Chinese to launch four U.S. satellites on the very day that its chairman, Wang Jan (referred to by the press as a &quot;Chinese arms dealer&quot;), attended one of Clinton&#039;s now-famous campaign coffees in the White House and later spent some time in Ron Brown&#039;s Commerce Department office.


The kind of space technology that Clinton has provided to China is just what it needs to make intercontinental ballistic missiles and point them more accurately at the United States.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Mass Lib, you mean like the preceding kleptocracy? How soon one forgets. </p>
<p>During 1996, U.S. policy dramatically changed for the financial and military benefit of China&#8217;s military enterprises and two U.S. multinationals, Loral Space and Communications and Hughes Electronics. Loral&#8217;s CEO, Bernard Schwartz, was the largest single contributor to the 1994 and 1996 Democratic campaigns, giving $275,000 to the Democrats in 1996.</p>
<p>The U.S. had previously barred all American companies from doing business with China Aerospace because it had made illegal missile sales to Pakistan. Col. Liu was assistant to the president of the sanctioned company and her father, General Liu, was in charge of the Chinese Army when China sold missiles to Iran and nuclear equipment to Pakistan, as well as carried on its own maneuvers to threaten Taiwan.</p>
<p>The Departments of Defense and State maintained that our satellite technology should be on what is known as the &#8220;munitions list,&#8221; the list of our most sensitive military and intelligence-gathering technology. Defense and State argued that commercial satellites carry technological secrets that can jeopardize &#8220;significant military and intelligence interests.&#8221;</p>
<p>Over the protests of Defense and State, Clinton personally reversed our policy and transferred jurisdiction over these exports from the State Department to Commerce Secretary Ron Brown. This let the technology transfer go forward and allowed U.S. civilian communications satellites to be launched by Colonel Liu&#8217;s China Aerospace.</p>
<p>The chronology is interesting. Clinton&#8217;s decision to approve the rocket and satellite technology transfer was announced on March 14, 1996, but the actual change was delayed until the fall. The campaign contributions arrived in the interim.</p>
<p>Another powerful government-owned enterprise that benefited from Clinton&#8217;s China policy was China International Trade and Investment Corporation. Clinton signed waivers allowing the Chinese to launch four U.S. satellites on the very day that its chairman, Wang Jan (referred to by the press as a &#8220;Chinese arms dealer&#8221;), attended one of Clinton&#8217;s now-famous campaign coffees in the White House and later spent some time in Ron Brown&#8217;s Commerce Department office.</p>
<p>The kind of space technology that Clinton has provided to China is just what it needs to make intercontinental ballistic missiles and point them more accurately at the United States.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=168978', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Massachusetts Liberal</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/11/vice-president-cheneys-halliburton/comment-page-1/#comment-168937</link>
		<dc:creator>Massachusetts Liberal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 14:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/11/vice-president-cheneys-halliburton/#comment-168937</guid>
		<description>Do we need any further proof that this is a kleptocracy we&#039;re living under?  War profiteering is Cheney&#039;s occupation.  Wonder if he can spare a couple thousand to help me heat my house this winter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do we need any further proof that this is a kleptocracy we&#8217;re living under?  War profiteering is Cheney&#8217;s occupation.  Wonder if he can spare a couple thousand to help me heat my house this winter.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=168937', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/11/vice-president-cheneys-halliburton/comment-page-1/#comment-168935</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 14:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/11/vice-president-cheneys-halliburton/#comment-168935</guid>
		<description>Apparently our Congress has no problem with it. Maybe some are saying one thing but voting another. Imagine that. 

The Senate voted Friday to give President Bush $50 billion more for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and U.S. military efforts against terrorism, money that would push total spending for the operations beyond $350 billion.

In a 97-0 vote, the GOP-controlled Senate signed off on the money as part of a $445 billion military spending bill for the budget year that began Oct. 1. 

Two years ago the Senate voted 87-12 in favor of an $87 billion supplemental appropriation for security and reconstruction in Iraq and Afghanistan. Of the 12 senators who voted &quot;no&quot; then, nine are still in the Senate, and eight of them voted &quot;yes&quot; on Friday. (Vemont&#039;s Pat Leahy was AWOL.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently our Congress has no problem with it. Maybe some are saying one thing but voting another. Imagine that. </p>
<p>The Senate voted Friday to give President Bush $50 billion more for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and U.S. military efforts against terrorism, money that would push total spending for the operations beyond $350 billion.</p>
<p>In a 97-0 vote, the GOP-controlled Senate signed off on the money as part of a $445 billion military spending bill for the budget year that began Oct. 1. </p>
<p>Two years ago the Senate voted 87-12 in favor of an $87 billion supplemental appropriation for security and reconstruction in Iraq and Afghanistan. Of the 12 senators who voted &#8220;no&#8221; then, nine are still in the Senate, and eight of them voted &#8220;yes&#8221; on Friday. (Vemont&#8217;s Pat Leahy was AWOL.)<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=168935', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pablo in Mexico</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/11/vice-president-cheneys-halliburton/comment-page-1/#comment-168915</link>
		<dc:creator>Pablo in Mexico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 14:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/11/vice-president-cheneys-halliburton/#comment-168915</guid>
		<description>Cheney, and any company he has ever been associated with, have been gun-runners and war profiteers for at least 30 years.

Cheney, and bush also, are evil incarnate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cheney, and any company he has ever been associated with, have been gun-runners and war profiteers for at least 30 years.</p>
<p>Cheney, and bush also, are evil incarnate.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=168915', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith H.</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/11/vice-president-cheneys-halliburton/comment-page-1/#comment-168894</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 13:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/11/vice-president-cheneys-halliburton/#comment-168894</guid>
		<description>#25
Bingo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#25<br />
Bingo.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=168894', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Bogs</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/11/vice-president-cheneys-halliburton/comment-page-1/#comment-168891</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Bogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 13:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/11/vice-president-cheneys-halliburton/#comment-168891</guid>
		<description>no wonder Cheney is probably behind the efforts to discredit anyone who could damage the case for war in Iraq... he stands to gain a lot by keeping the war going... sick mofo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no wonder Cheney is probably behind the efforts to discredit anyone who could damage the case for war in Iraq&#8230; he stands to gain a lot by keeping the war going&#8230; sick mofo<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=168891', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dumb Fox</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/11/vice-president-cheneys-halliburton/comment-page-1/#comment-168667</link>
		<dc:creator>Dumb Fox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 12:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/11/vice-president-cheneys-halliburton/#comment-168667</guid>
		<description>#21 and #22 - the 3,281% figure is not impossible by any means. If you&#039;ve been schooled in option-pricing theory, you&#039;ll know where I am coming from, but I&#039;ll give you a quick and easy illustration.

Remember that options are not physically settled - i.e. you don&#039;t actually receive delivery of shares if you exercise the option - instead, at settlement, you receive the difference between the strike and the price at which the security is trading. So say the (average) strike price for Cheney&#039;s options is $30... if Halliburton traded at around $31, the options at settlement will be worth $1. With Halliburton at $61 a share now, the options will be worth $31 at settlement.

3,000%+ appreciation in value - no problemo.

[Ps. this is a gross simplification of option pricing, but just wanted to demonstrate the 3,000% appreciation is easily arrived at.]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#21 and #22 &#8211; the 3,281% figure is not impossible by any means. If you&#8217;ve been schooled in option-pricing theory, you&#8217;ll know where I am coming from, but I&#8217;ll give you a quick and easy illustration.</p>
<p>Remember that options are not physically settled &#8211; i.e. you don&#8217;t actually receive delivery of shares if you exercise the option &#8211; instead, at settlement, you receive the difference between the strike and the price at which the security is trading. So say the (average) strike price for Cheney&#8217;s options is $30&#8230; if Halliburton traded at around $31, the options at settlement will be worth $1. With Halliburton at $61 a share now, the options will be worth $31 at settlement.</p>
<p>3,000%+ appreciation in value &#8211; no problemo.</p>
<p>[Ps. this is a gross simplification of option pricing, but just wanted to demonstrate the 3,000% appreciation is easily arrived at.]<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=168667', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Muse</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/11/vice-president-cheneys-halliburton/comment-page-1/#comment-168441</link>
		<dc:creator>The Muse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 04:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/11/vice-president-cheneys-halliburton/#comment-168441</guid>
		<description>This calls for a reprise of a piece that was overwhelmed by Katrina in its day, but seems to be just as valid now:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eyewitnessmuse.com/diary.php?p=139&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;The United States of Halliburton&quot;&lt;/a&gt;

Over the weekend (when the Bush Administration is at its most nefarious because most of America is preoccupied with getting drunk at barbeques or running from hurricanes), the Pentagon demoted the Army contracting official who criticized massive, noncompetitive contracts that Halliburton received for the reconstruction of Iraq. 

The move demonstrates, to paraphrase the Administrationâ€™s tired mantra on fighting terror, that â€œwe will move heaven and earth to find a low-level minion to blame for every gargantuan screw-up we commit...â€</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This calls for a reprise of a piece that was overwhelmed by Katrina in its day, but seems to be just as valid now:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.eyewitnessmuse.com/diary.php?p=139" rel="nofollow">&#8220;The United States of Halliburton&#8221;</a></p>
<p>Over the weekend (when the Bush Administration is at its most nefarious because most of America is preoccupied with getting drunk at barbeques or running from hurricanes), the Pentagon demoted the Army contracting official who criticized massive, noncompetitive contracts that Halliburton received for the reconstruction of Iraq. </p>
<p>The move demonstrates, to paraphrase the Administrationâ€™s tired mantra on fighting terror, that â€œwe will move heaven and earth to find a low-level minion to blame for every gargantuan screw-up we commit&#8230;â€<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=168441', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Ehrlichman</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/11/vice-president-cheneys-halliburton/comment-page-1/#comment-168414</link>
		<dc:creator>John Ehrlichman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 03:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/11/vice-president-cheneys-halliburton/#comment-168414</guid>
		<description>let me make is clear that I AM NOT DEFENDING THE VICE PRESIDENT, but this statement is really thin. I think jwb&#039;s math is closer to accurate and I&#039;d like to see more figures than this wacky estimate. it&#039;s obvious to me that the cheney/halliburton relationship is a conflict worth investigating. I&#039;d love to see dick behind bars in his golden years, unable to spend any of his blood money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>let me make is clear that I AM NOT DEFENDING THE VICE PRESIDENT, but this statement is really thin. I think jwb&#8217;s math is closer to accurate and I&#8217;d like to see more figures than this wacky estimate. it&#8217;s obvious to me that the cheney/halliburton relationship is a conflict worth investigating. I&#8217;d love to see dick behind bars in his golden years, unable to spend any of his blood money.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=168414', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jwb</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/11/vice-president-cheneys-halliburton/comment-page-1/#comment-168239</link>
		<dc:creator>jwb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 02:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/11/vice-president-cheneys-halliburton/#comment-168239</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sorry to piss on the parade, but I think the 3281% figure should be retracted.  If Cheney&#039;s options were practically worthless 1 year ago, that means their strike price is around $30/share.  With today&#039;s closing price on HAL at $61.78, his gain is approximately 100%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry to piss on the parade, but I think the 3281% figure should be retracted.  If Cheney&#8217;s options were practically worthless 1 year ago, that means their strike price is around $30/share.  With today&#8217;s closing price on HAL at $61.78, his gain is approximately 100%.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=168239', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Evil</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/11/vice-president-cheneys-halliburton/comment-page-1/#comment-168237</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Evil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 02:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/11/vice-president-cheneys-halliburton/#comment-168237</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure he&#039;s talking to Jimmy Carter right now about how to get involved. Dick(head) Cheney hammering nails for the poor and hurricane victims. With every stroke of the hammer I can imagine him saying, I - hate - Karl - Rove - OW!!! I - hate - Karl - Rove - SHIT! I - hate - Patrick - DAMMIT! - Fitzgerald!! OW - DAMN - OUCH.......!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure he&#8217;s talking to Jimmy Carter right now about how to get involved. Dick(head) Cheney hammering nails for the poor and hurricane victims. With every stroke of the hammer I can imagine him saying, I &#8211; hate &#8211; Karl &#8211; Rove &#8211; OW!!! I &#8211; hate &#8211; Karl &#8211; Rove &#8211; SHIT! I &#8211; hate &#8211; Patrick &#8211; DAMMIT! &#8211; Fitzgerald!! OW &#8211; DAMN &#8211; OUCH&#8230;&#8230;.!<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=168237', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Theresa</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/11/vice-president-cheneys-halliburton/comment-page-1/#comment-168235</link>
		<dc:creator>Theresa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 02:24:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/11/vice-president-cheneys-halliburton/#comment-168235</guid>
		<description>#11 said &quot;... Impeachment is too good for these assholes - while the rest of the world goes without - jobs, insurance, food, clean water, clean air...&quot;

And don&#039;t forget heat for the winter (whether it&#039;s gas, electric, oil and/or kerosene). Ya think Dickey boy is going to be shriveled and pulled up tighter than a gonad in this winter&#039;s cold? I think not...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#11 said &#8220;&#8230; Impeachment is too good for these assholes &#8211; while the rest of the world goes without &#8211; jobs, insurance, food, clean water, clean air&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>And don&#8217;t forget heat for the winter (whether it&#8217;s gas, electric, oil and/or kerosene). Ya think Dickey boy is going to be shriveled and pulled up tighter than a gonad in this winter&#8217;s cold? I think not&#8230;<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=168235', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Bua</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/11/vice-president-cheneys-halliburton/comment-page-1/#comment-168234</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Bua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 02:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/11/vice-president-cheneys-halliburton/#comment-168234</guid>
		<description>And I&#039;m sure that money will go right to Habitat for Humanity to build homes in the hurricane zone, yes?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I&#8217;m sure that money will go right to Habitat for Humanity to build homes in the hurricane zone, yes?<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=168234', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
