Claiming God’s Support, Conservatives Push Massive Budget Cuts
Claiming God’s Support, Conservatives Push Massive Budget Cuts
Rep. Mike Pence (R-IN) is the chairman of the Republican Study Committee. Today, he’s leading House conservatives in an effort to slash roughly $50 billion from programs like Medicare, Medicaid, and student loans.
But don’t question the moral value of balancing the budget on the backs of poor people, children, and pregnant women. Apparently Pence has God on his side:
On Monday, the [Republican Study Committee] opened its e-mail update with this quote from George Washington: “My diffidence in my own abilities was superseded by a confidence in the rectitude of our cause and the patronage of heaven.â€
The slightly overwrought, somewhat intractable sentiment comes from 1775, when the original George W. was called upon to lead the Revolutionary Army.
As The Hill noted, “Let it not be said that the Republican Study Committee isn’t convinced — make that absolutely certain — of the righteous nature of its actions.”
Topic Cloud
ArchivesBlog Roll
Delusions of grandeur much, RSC?
October 20th, 2005 at 3:58 pmWhat you do unto the least of these, you do unto me.
Who said that?
October 20th, 2005 at 4:00 pmGod, I need a BIG loan, G.W.
October 20th, 2005 at 4:03 pm“The test of our progress, is not whether we add more
October 20th, 2005 at 4:03 pmto the abundance of those who have much; it is whether
we provide enough for those who have too little.”
Same question.
Sounds like the RSC has been listening to Republican Jesus.
October 20th, 2005 at 4:04 pm“I have sworn eternal warfare against all forms of
superstition over the minds of men.”
This one seems appropriate too.
October 20th, 2005 at 4:04 pm“The question before the human race is,
whether the God of nature shall govern the
world by his own laws, or whether priests
and kings shall rule it by fictitious
miracles?”
Last one. All fit I think.
October 20th, 2005 at 4:05 pmGod told neocons that the poor, kids and expectant mothers all need to be taught a lesson.
“They’ll never be motivated to help themselves unless you use legislation to motivate them,” He said. “You have My blessing.”
God’s image then disappeared from the ceiling, and the neocons went back to sipping their Texas cow pattie mushroom tea.
October 20th, 2005 at 4:07 pmMike Pence and his kind will burn forever.
October 20th, 2005 at 4:07 pmI guess you can’t complain about the deficit if you are not willing to cut spending.
October 20th, 2005 at 4:13 pmThat’s really stupid freeper troll.
October 20th, 2005 at 4:14 pmDid you ever come clean on your LIE from yesterday?
October 20th, 2005 at 4:15 pmWell, everyday, but yesterday you were REALLY caught in
a lie you freeper troll.
If God is telling them to rob the poor for the benfit of the rich, then I’m sure glad their God isn’t my God!
October 20th, 2005 at 4:22 pmNED, your buddies in Congress and the White House have presided over a phenomal growth in the federal government. How is this the fault of the Democrats?
How about balancing the budget by rolling back the tax cuts on the wealthiest 1% of amerkuns? You aren’t in that 1% so why should you care if Paris Hilton and the Walton family get a tax break?
During WWII the highest tax rate in the country was 77% and that was for that same 1% of Americans. That’s sacrifice. That’s patriotic duty. That’s how you pay for a war. You don’t pay for it with tax cuts.
October 20th, 2005 at 4:23 pm“What influence in fact have ecclesiastical
October 20th, 2005 at 4:24 pmestablishments had on Civil Society? In some
instances they have been seen to erect a spiritual
tyranny on the ruins of the Civil authority; in
many instances they have been seen upholding the
thrones of political tyranny; in no instance have
they been seen the guardians of the liberties of
the people. Rulers who wished to subvert the
public liberty may have found an established
Clergy convenient auxiliaries. A just
Government instituted to secure & perpetuate
it needs them not.”
Madison – 1785
“We are continuing Jesus’s ministry…by turning our backs on the poor, making war for profit, judging others, and rewarding the moneychangers at every opportunity.
Hallelujah!!!”
October 20th, 2005 at 4:24 pmThey created god in their own image, therefore he hates the same people that they do.
October 20th, 2005 at 4:26 pmDo they have no humility, no shame bandying God about like a power tool getting the job done?
October 20th, 2005 at 4:26 pmOh yeah, Answers:
October 20th, 2005 at 4:26 pm#4: FDR
#6: TJ
#8: John Adams
Praise Allah.
October 20th, 2005 at 4:28 pmAllah is great.
Allah is good.
“Big-time negotiators, false healers and woman haters,
October 20th, 2005 at 4:30 pmMasters of the bluff and masters of the proposition
But the enemy I see wears a cloak of decency,
All non-believers and men stealers talkin’ in the name of religion
And there’s a slow, slow train comin’ up around the bend…”
After all, God is a conservative.
October 20th, 2005 at 4:32 pmJust ask ‘em, they’ll tell ya.
“I guess you can’t complain about the deficit if you are not willing to cut spending.”
How about we cut the $4 billion spent on Iraq every month?
October 20th, 2005 at 4:32 pmHmmm, this must be the same God that told Chimpus to attack Iraq. This is not the same God of compassion, hunility, and love that most of us was taught about.
October 20th, 2005 at 4:40 pm“Blessed are the rich, for they shall inherit everything – and pay no death tax.â€
– Supply-side Jesus
October 20th, 2005 at 4:50 pmHey NED, I guess you haven’t met this guy…
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/18/politics/18bartlett.html?pagewanted=print
He’s a conservative too. He just lost his job because he wrote a book about what a goof Bush is.
October 20th, 2005 at 4:58 pmYour link doesn’t work, Andrew.
October 20th, 2005 at 5:06 pmOh, NM.
October 20th, 2005 at 5:06 pm“I guess you can’t complain about the deficit if you are not willing to cut spending.
Comment by The Northeast Dilemma”
Sure you can – that’s your limited and uneducated self restriction – and it isn’t consistent with a sane and rational person. A sane and rational person discusses ALL of the options – including a tax increase on corporations and wealthy americans. I can bitch about spending and come up with the solution all without cutting any spending.
Of course if we cut out all of the money wasted on Iraq, No Bid Contracts, the billions gone ‘missing’ in Iraq, the medicare Pharmaceutical fraud giveaway, and the OIL SUBSIDIES, that would be fine as well.
October 20th, 2005 at 5:08 pm“After all, God is a conservative.
Just ask ‘em, they’ll tell ya.
Comment by Keith H”
If god were a conservative, then the world would be run like the free republic, and any dissent would be met with a bolt of lightening. Clearly god is a liberal, because she lets psychotics like MissWrong and MissNED to defile her name daily.
October 20th, 2005 at 5:10 pmSo the Almighty is not only a conservative, a Bush supporter and a Republican, he would also slash aid to elderly, poor and children.
October 20th, 2005 at 5:17 pmJeezus! Do these guys ever LISTEN to themselves?
If I were replying to troll NED, I would ask him about eliminating the tax cuts for the rich as a method to reduce spending.
October 20th, 2005 at 5:24 pmDidn’t Jesus say something about money changers?
Didn’t Jesus say something about the poor and the children?
Didn’t Jesus say something about turning the other cheek?
Didn’t Jesus say something about the the peacemakers being blessed?
Didn’t the ten commandments say something about honoring one’s parents?
Didn’t Jesus have a lot to say about hypocrites?
Ryan – Increasing taxes will hurt the economy more. The Great Depression occurred because Herbert Hoover implemented liberal economic policies – he raised taxes on the wealthy and he increased trade barriers. That’s an undeniably FACT.
As bad as things are today, raising taxes will only make things worse. The GOP should have never agreed to that awful medicare prescription giveaway and they shouldn’t have passed an energy bill that didn’t include domestic production. But, never should they raise taxes when the economy is at risk.
October 20th, 2005 at 5:36 pmNED,
I have a degree in economics, I can show you why you’re wrong, but you are.
Year of economic collapse 1929
Year of tax increases by Hoover 1932
Increasing taxes on the wealthiest americans INCREASES economic health, it doesn’t undermine it. The problem with Hoover, is that the his tax increases occurred 3 years after the stock market crash, and it was too little too late. Once FDR FURTHER increased the tax and spending balance, the economy adjusted.
October 20th, 2005 at 5:54 pmSee the chart below. Note that the tax increases were enacted during 1932, and note the boom in the economy (or should I say the halt of the collapse) in 1933.
NED, you live in a world of delusion and propaganda – how can one group of people be wrong on virtually every topic? It’s just insane!
Year %Change in GNP President
October 20th, 2005 at 6:01 pm———————————-
1930 – 9.4% Hoover
1931 – 8.5 Hoover
1932 -13.4 Hoover
1933 – 2.1 Hoover/Roosevelt
1934 + 7.7 Roosevelt
1935 + 8.1 Roosevelt
1936 +14.1 Roosevelt
1937 + 5.0 Roosevelt
1938 – 4.5 Roosevelt
1939 + 7.9 Roosevelt
More idiocy from NED. He/she/it is off the compass. Look at the deficit the bushlandia trade policies has got us into. The deficit, my ignorant jerk, is 8 trillion dollars if you add it all up.
Now, divide that by the number of people in the US and maybe, just maybe, you can see what it is costing every man, woman and child in this country. I think it is somewhere around $26,000 for each man, woman and child in this country.
Have you paid your share yet NED?
Now my ignorant idiot. If you raised taxes on just the top 1% of the people, are you going to insist that that is going to hurt the economy. No stupid. It will help the economy.
You give tax cuts, except for bushlandia, for one reason and one reason only. That is to spur spending. Do you really think that the millionaiare is going to buy another car, when he has two in the garage and one parked in front of his mansion?
Do you think the multi-millionaire is going to buy another washing machine, another refrigerator when he has two already?
If you think these things, you are more stupid that even I give you credit for.
By the way, they dont make idiot neocons any worse than Mike Pence of Indiana.
October 20th, 2005 at 6:09 pmhttp://www.shambhala.org/business/goldocean/causdep.html#Whathappened
Ryan – you miss the point entirely. The Great Depression would have ended much sooner if tax hikes were never implemented at all.
October 20th, 2005 at 6:18 pmNed,
Did you even read the numbers? The economy began to boom as soon as the taxes were raised, whereas the country was in a DOWNWARD SPIRAL until the EXACT point where they were instituted. This is IDENTICAL to the situation when Clinton took office.
You obviously never read the link you sent.
“Unemployment soared, in the United States it peaked at 24.9% in 1933″
That’s the same year the tax breaks went into effect, and they stopped the tide that year. They didn’t prolong it, they made it better!
So no, your whole theory is wrong, debunked, incorrect!
However if we look at the tax cuts that occurred under Bush, that’s a clear example of a prolonged recession as a result of bad fiscal policy!
October 20th, 2005 at 6:23 pmI just love how stupid idiots like NED can be. The great depression is getting progessively worse, and 3 years into it they increase taxes. The GDP crash basically stops as SOON as the tax increases go into effect, and the economy begins to rebound. And he says it ‘made things worse’. Wow, the delusion is all encompassing.
You know Ned, I can through these tax increase and decrease numbers from the entire 20th century, and prove that you’re wrong over and over – but we both know you’re never gonna admit your wrong because you’re nuts!
October 20th, 2005 at 6:26 pmRyan – compare the recession of 2001 to the of 1991. Aside from unemployment – which was very low to begin to with – all economic indicators improved much faster then they did in the early 1990s. AND as “bad” as things are today, unemployment remains at a healthy 5.1%.
The economy was in expansion when Clinton came to office – don’t forget that. Unemployment, the last indicator to heal in recession, just hadn’t improved yet.
Also, you show your ignorance and your age when you use the term GNP. We economists call it GDP.
October 20th, 2005 at 6:28 pmThe Great Depression occurred because Herbert Hoover implemented liberal economic policies – he raised taxes on the wealthy and he increased trade barriers. That’s an undeniably FACT.
Comment by The Northeast Dilemma — October 20, 2005 @ 5:36 pm
Then he serves up a waffle:
“The Great Depression would have ended much sooner if tax hikes were never implemented at all.”
The Great Depression occurred primarily because of the worst stock market crash in U.S. history, which was the result of a completely unregulated market with systemic corruption.
Raising taxes on the haves allowed FDR to put an entire generation back to work again through public works projects. Once workers had money, they spent it and our economy came back. Keynes was right.
October 20th, 2005 at 6:38 pmDidn’t Son of Sam claim that God spoke to him through a dog?
October 20th, 2005 at 6:39 pmThe way things are going we’ll need a healthy supply of the poor in the future so we can erase our many sins with charitable giving, and earn our place in heaven. Y’know, giving from the heart.
October 20th, 2005 at 6:55 pmRepublicans and trolls will not change their minds until events hit them personally. For example, as the cost of higher education rises because of decreased federal funding, requiring more out-of-pocket costs for students, added to the reduction in student loans, we will soon see college educations for the wealthy only — the rest need not apply.
October 20th, 2005 at 7:24 pmIn business, we are seeing a return to the early 20th century of robber barons, wealthy owners earning profits on the back of laborers who had no rights.
We are becoming a nation of two classes: the elite who have all the wealth, education, and ownership, and the rest of us, serfs, with little voice, no wealth, poorly educated, but able to fill the ranks of the army needed to fight the rich men’s battles.
Today there is talk of war with Syria, and of course, Iran –hell, maybe both of them.
Anyone read 1984 lately?
“Also, you show your ignorance and your age when you use the term GNP. We economists call it GDP.
Comment by The Northeast Dilemma ”
‘We economists?’ Bahaha, you need to get another degree then.
Gross national product (GNP) per capita is the dollar value of a country’s final output of goods and services in a year, divided by its population.
The statistics I rendered for you were in GNP terms. It’s how those figures were captured and historically recorded. Now WHO’s showing their age again? That would be you.
If you are an economist, you’ve clearly been brainwashed at the trickledown theory of economics. Not only is that a debunked and disproven mythology, but it doesn’t have a single proven example. In fact everytime someone points out that things get WORSE under trickledown, they simply say ‘well it would have been worse without it’.
The reality is that when Hoover raised taxes, the economy improved. When FDR raised taxes, the economy improved. When Clinton raised taxes, the economy improved. Whereas when Bush lowered taxes, the economy GOT WORSE.
The trickle down religionists are the creationists of economics. They’re zealots and morons!
October 20th, 2005 at 7:34 pmGee NeD,
I guess you got caught lying again.
October 20th, 2005 at 7:49 pmThat’s two days in a row.
You are such a tool.
Maybe you should whimper back to
freeper land where people don’t
think but rather recite talking points to
each other all day.
Here’s some terminology for you NED, since you claim to be an economist (CLEARLY ANOTHER LIE). In particular economic profits from foreign capital was counted in this figure – and therefore the number is in GNP. Most economists focus on GDP, because those are goods and services actually produced in the country. As american companies have become increasingly international – the GDP has largely become the focus of economists. Especially since there are lots of foreign held capital in the subsidiaries that don’t effectively get transferred onto the balance sheet of their holding entities. It’s a reflection of globalization and more modern practices in accounting and tax codes.
Gross National Product (GNP) is the total value of final goods and services produced in a year by a country’s nationals (including profits from capital held abroad).
Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is the total value of final goods and services produced within a country’s borders in a year.
Net National Product (NNP) is GNP minus depreciation
Net National Income (NNI) is NNP minus indirect taxes
Personal Income (PI) is NNI minus retained earnings, corporate taxes, transfer payments, and interest on the public debt
Personal Disposable Income (PDI) is PI minus personal taxes, plus transfer payments.
October 20th, 2005 at 8:27 pmafterthought,
I ‘think’ we’re up to 3 days in a row now. But then I lose count. Most of the idiots just spout nonsense that’s brokered from the heritage foundation or some other non-think tank. In the economics area especially, the rightwing stuff isn’t even general peer reviewed – it’s just bunk! Their metrics and justifications are nonsense – just like their claims of tax cuts not prolonging the downturn. When you apply an economic measure and IT GETS WORSE – you caused it, pure and simple. Yet these dufus just lie through their teeth – because without the ‘taxes improve the economy’ lie, they don’t have a real excuse for cutting them, especially for rich people!
Lets address it from a psychological pressure. Incentives cause people to act generally. The wealthy as a class are risk averse (I can tell you from personal tendencies this is true). If you cut the taxes on the wealthy, our return on investments just increased, and therefore the ‘risk’ we would consider taking to get a good return reduces. If I get a great return, and I can keep my money safe – I will. So goes the incentive.
If you increase my taxes, thereby making me look at my portfolio of assets (actually most wealthy don’t have an economics degree, or do a lot of our own investments, bean counters do it for us) – I might consider taking a higher risk investment for part of my portfolio to increase return. This might be in the form of some private investment or holding company, or startup venture where my expected return is much higher. If I lose part of that investment, I know it will still have good tax consequences – but if I succeed I will offset my increased tax burden.
It’s just basic psychology – and the fact that so many middle class morons are duped into making my life easier just saddens me. It’s the worst kind of classist and colonialist behavior. And the funny part is that I benefit under NED’s foolishness and I can almost guarantee you that she loses!
October 20th, 2005 at 8:36 pmIt part of the mass dismantling of all programs inside the non borders non government ideals of one world.
The running pigs and dogs in washington hate this country and hate the ideals of freedom and justice, its part of what the real powers want and in our deep evil future you will see things of madness that will make the bad days of world war two look like haven on earth!..you are being murdered by this insane non system and can’t see it, the mass government engineering you by mass propaganda that will use any idea to make you hate each other and someday you will kill each other for political and race reason, bush hitler the same guy.
October 20th, 2005 at 8:45 pmYeah Ryan,
I am not an economist, but it is not hard to see
October 20th, 2005 at 8:48 pmthrough the simple lies.
The thing that is surprizing (Have you read
“What’s the Matter with Kansas”?) is how
people who are not wealthy enough to benefit
from the cuts in any real way support high-bracket
tax cuts even when it is against their obvious economic
interest. That is what I find really interesting,
and sad, really. I know that the conservative
movement is basically all based on deceit, but
that so many people could be manipulated to
vote against their own well being? Hard to imagine
if I was not seeing it.
I have friends who are basically normal and
smart, but I listen to the BS they repeat
directly from some right-wing talking-head
who is worth 10’s of millions of dollars
about how he represents them while sucking on
a $200 cigar? I mean how stupid can you get?
#52 – “how stupid can you get”? Obviously – some people out there are pretty damn stupid. It’s painful for the rest of us who end up paying for that stupidity.
October 20th, 2005 at 8:53 pm“and the patronage of heaven”
he was so thrilled to serve his master that he said heaven instead of HE..
Well U know the other place
October 20th, 2005 at 10:14 pmReally, NED, really. You are looking like an uneducated, lying, vastly ignorant Repugnantcan. Please STFU.
October 20th, 2005 at 11:00 pmRyan, will you do my taxes? You’re so cool.
October 21st, 2005 at 10:59 amWow! We’re never going to have world peace if you keep attacking NED! NED IS correct about FDR prolonging the depression and more importantly FDR is as guilty an opportunist as the abusers of the stock market were. Besides, NED can’t be that stupid if he agrees with me!!! He must be a genius…and Irish! So There! (Turk saunters off, thumbs in his belt loops…)
October 21st, 2005 at 1:36 pmTurk,
Bahaha, What a stupid rant! And such nonsense!
October 21st, 2005 at 1:43 pmAnyone who speaks of him/herself as a genious most certainly IS NOT.
October 21st, 2005 at 1:52 pmAs usual we can count on the GOP to further erode programs for the less fortunate in society and continue to find ways to have the rich get even richer. The never met a company they wouldn’t help and a poor person they wouldn’t try to hurt. These people have the nerve to call themselves Christians, but they are going to burn in hell. I don’t know what bible the read, but the one I know about says, Jesus fed the masses, not the rich. Why did he feed them, because they were hungry. He didn’t seek out the rich to help them at all.
Remember the part in the bible that says, “A camel could pass through the eye of a niddle easier than a rich man could entire the kingdom of heaven”. And their is the part about Lazius sitting outside of the rich man’s gate hungry and they laughed and spat on him as they went in. Well as it turned out those rich people went to hell and they saw Lazius in heaven being comforted by the Angels. The asked God if they could just have one drop of the water which the Angels poured over Lazius’s head to quench their thirst.
So all of those Conservative idiots are going to look up and want some of the water being given to the poor in heaven. They’d better start reading he bible more, because it isn’t about helping the rich at all. Oh, I forgot Jerry Faldwell, Pat Roberston, Oral Roberts, and Dr Dobson minister to the rich only. They have a different God than we do. Their God believes in hurting the poor, weak, and less fortunate among their fellow men. He is for big Companies and against the workers who make the products they get rich from.
So when they asked God to Bless America, they mean the rich, the Companies and their families and friends only.
October 21st, 2005 at 3:06 pmRyan- you’re just being hurtful, and a big meanie head.
October 21st, 2005 at 4:15 pmProgressive- You’re not seriously proud or you’d spell genius without the “o”, I’m sorry I had to stoop to ryan’s hurtful level.
Luke- The bible says to help the rich, cheat the poor and hate people until Haliburton takes over the world…it’s right there in….the middle of the book…I saw it….
Ryan, will you do my taxes? You’re so cool.
Comment by progressive and proud
He’d rather do your 12 year old son.
October 21st, 2005 at 4:20 pmGet over Ryan, man. He does not want you. Your talk of little boys and sex is really offensive. You have issues, dude. You don’t need to bring your sexed up perverted republicanism here.
What’s with the freak sex stuff, anyway? Why are repubs so sexed up?
October 21st, 2005 at 4:22 pmBruce Bartlett article excerpt(not a Bush cheerleader):
“…Interestingly, the latest Internal Revenue Service data on distribution of the tax burden were released the same day Tritch’s tirade appeared. The data show that the top 1 percent of taxpayers paid 34.3 percent of all federal income taxes in 2003, although they earned just 16.8 percent of the adjusted gross income. The top 5 percent of taxpayers paid more than half of all federal income taxes, the top 10 percent paid two-thirds, and the top half of taxpayers paid 96.5 percent — meaning that the bottom half paid just 3.5 percent.
Another IRS report deconstructed the top 1 percent and found that the top 10 percent of the top 1 percent (the top 0.1 percent) increased their share of all federal income taxes from 7 percent in 1980 to 15.3 percent in 2003. These 129,000 tax filers earned 7.6 percent of the income and paid an average tax rate of 23.6 percent. This came to $114.6 billion — four times more than all the taxes paid by the 64 million taxpayers in the bottom 50 percent, who paid an average tax rate of 2.9 percent.
I would be curious to know just how much more Tritch thinks the wealthy ought to be paying. Back in the good old days (from her point of view) when Jimmy Carter was president and the top statutory tax rate was 70 percent (versus 35 percent today), the top 1 percent of taxpayers paid only 19.7 percent of all federal income taxes. In other words, although the marginal tax rate of the top 1 percent has fallen by 50 percent, their tax share has almost doubled.
I assume that Tritch would be happier with the British tax system, where the top income tax rate is 40 percent. But according to British tax data, the top 1 percent of taxpayers pay just 21 percent of income taxes, the top 5 percent pay 40 percent, and the top 10 percent pay 52 percent. The bottom 50 percent, meanwhile, pay 11 percent of all income taxes. In other words, wealthy British pay higher rates — as Tritch would have it here — but pay less of the overall tax burden….”
http://www.nationalreview.com/nrof_bartlett/bartlett200510130903.asp
The Laffer Curve is alive and well!
October 21st, 2005 at 4:32 pmI meant I’d rather do your 12 year old son – my priest showed me how to make him purr!
October 21st, 2005 at 5:05 pmscottynx,
That report is an utter lie.
The bush tax cuts have greatly shifted the burden to the middle class.
http://msnbc.msn.com/id/5689001/
The Nation Review is a NAZI SPIN MACHINE of NeoCon disciples of Leo Strauss – the ‘great’ american german nazi philosopher. Their first rule is lies and propaganda are useful tools. The fact you believe anything from that rag just shows your idiocy!
October 21st, 2005 at 5:11 pmRyan- Run from your leftist roots! Deny the acrimony of baseless insults for the sake of position! Embrace the open mind of being like me….which is Irish….with a dash of theater….
October 21st, 2005 at 7:58 pmClaiming God’s Support, Conservatives Push Massive Budget Cuts
After a certain point you become desensitized to Republican hypocrisy and then they push it that much farther and you get horrified again. Evidently now it’s God’s will that the Republicans help make rich people richer with the money’s meant…
October 22nd, 2005 at 9:30 amI meant I’d rather do your 12 year old son – my priest showed me how to make him purr!
Comment by I-RIGHT-I — October 21, 2005 @ 5:05 pm
Looks like Ryan “little boys are fun” Neat is projecting again.
I think Ryan should be banned for using my handle. But that’s just me.
October 22nd, 2005 at 1:07 pmDaffodil- To recognize hypocrisy is an admission of right or wrong and unless I’m mistaken (which is a lifestyle for me…) there is no absolute right and wrong….BTW, who’s rich? Who decides? Just because none of us Irish are rich doesn’t make it anybody elses fault, although I suspect the British are behind the scenes…..
October 24th, 2005 at 5:55 pmAre there no work houses? Are there no prisons? Then let them die and decrease the surplus population. Seems to be the Republican mantra.
March 2nd, 2006 at 1:34 pmRyan Neat:
March 19th, 2006 at 7:18 pmYou are a ass-licking, cow felching, dumb fuck piece of shit.