<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hutchison Flip-Flops on Importance of Perjury</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/24/hutchison-flip-flop/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/24/hutchison-flip-flop/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 02:53:46 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: canofwormsblog.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; George W. Bush should have an affairâ€¦</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/24/hutchison-flip-flop/comment-page-2/#comment-1934510</link>
		<dc:creator>canofwormsblog.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; George W. Bush should have an affairâ€¦</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 20:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=2273#comment-1934510</guid>
		<description>[...] the â€œcorruptionâ€ the only charge filed was for perjury, which Republicans today claim is just a technicality. You would think after a REAL partisan like Ken Starr (unlike Patrick Fitzgerald who even Bush [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the â€œcorruptionâ€ the only charge filed was for perjury, which Republicans today claim is just a technicality. You would think after a REAL partisan like Ken Starr (unlike Patrick Fitzgerald who even Bush [...]<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=1934510', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: evancnorman.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Texas Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison is scared of debate!</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/24/hutchison-flip-flop/comment-page-2/#comment-771592</link>
		<dc:creator>evancnorman.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Texas Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison is scared of debate!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Sep 2006 17:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=2273#comment-771592</guid>
		<description>[...] Unfortunately, all of that hairspray and &#8220;sweet little Texas girl&#8221; fluff would melt under the glare of any sort of debate, even one at a high school level. Hutchison has made it clear that, like the rest of her Republican cronies, she will be talking out of both sides of her mouth to whoever her audience happens to be. Talk about flip-flopping. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Unfortunately, all of that hairspray and &#8220;sweet little Texas girl&#8221; fluff would melt under the glare of any sort of debate, even one at a high school level. Hutchison has made it clear that, like the rest of her Republican cronies, she will be talking out of both sides of her mouth to whoever her audience happens to be. Talk about flip-flopping. [...]<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=771592', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: borborygmus</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/24/hutchison-flip-flop/comment-page-2/#comment-291521</link>
		<dc:creator>borborygmus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2005 00:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=2273#comment-291521</guid>
		<description>RE #56: Maggie Thatcher went to war after Argentina invaded UK territory, and the reason for war was never lied about. While victory made her more generally popular, it was not a campaign theme -she didn&#039;t go around calling herself a &#039;war prime minister&#039;- and she won by a landslide anyway. In Argentina the defeat led to a military junta being replaced by a democracy. 

The scandals were mainly sexual in nature, not lies and abuse of power. The tories have been out of power for 8 years and may be back in soon, as many people are fed up with the lies and spin culture of the current Labout government, that seems to have been adopted from the US.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE #56: Maggie Thatcher went to war after Argentina invaded UK territory, and the reason for war was never lied about. While victory made her more generally popular, it was not a campaign theme -she didn&#8217;t go around calling herself a &#8216;war prime minister&#8217;- and she won by a landslide anyway. In Argentina the defeat led to a military junta being replaced by a democracy. </p>
<p>The scandals were mainly sexual in nature, not lies and abuse of power. The tories have been out of power for 8 years and may be back in soon, as many people are fed up with the lies and spin culture of the current Labout government, that seems to have been adopted from the US.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=291521', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patrick emerson &#187; Blog Archive &#187; the next administration will bring honor and dignity to the White House</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/24/hutchison-flip-flop/comment-page-2/#comment-193761</link>
		<dc:creator>patrick emerson &#187; Blog Archive &#187; the next administration will bring honor and dignity to the White House</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2005 19:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=2273#comment-193761</guid>
		<description>[...] In August of 2000 candidate George Bush said &#8220;Americans want to be assured that the next administration will bring honor and dignity to the White House.&#8221; He also said &#8220;Americans are tired of investigations and scandal&#8221;. It is interesting to listen to the GOP try to spin the indictment of Scooter Libby. Texas Senator Kay Bailey Hutchinson said that perjury was a mere technicality. Funny, in 1999 Sen. Hutchinson thought perjury was quite a bit more serious and so did many fellow GOP congressmen. Sounds like a bunch of flip-floppers. They are all talking about the criminalization of politics, but one has to wonder, did they forgot about Ken Starr? Did they forget about a Whitewater investigation that lasted years but only turned up a lie about a blowjob? There is no indication if there will be more indictments. There is a lot of speculation that Karl Rove and even Dick Cheney will be the next targets. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In August of 2000 candidate George Bush said &#8220;Americans want to be assured that the next administration will bring honor and dignity to the White House.&#8221; He also said &#8220;Americans are tired of investigations and scandal&#8221;. It is interesting to listen to the GOP try to spin the indictment of Scooter Libby. Texas Senator Kay Bailey Hutchinson said that perjury was a mere technicality. Funny, in 1999 Sen. Hutchinson thought perjury was quite a bit more serious and so did many fellow GOP congressmen. Sounds like a bunch of flip-floppers. They are all talking about the criminalization of politics, but one has to wonder, did they forgot about Ken Starr? Did they forget about a Whitewater investigation that lasted years but only turned up a lie about a blowjob? There is no indication if there will be more indictments. There is a lot of speculation that Karl Rove and even Dick Cheney will be the next targets. [...]<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=193761', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Sparkle</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/24/hutchison-flip-flop/comment-page-2/#comment-193738</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Sparkle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2005 17:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=2273#comment-193738</guid>
		<description>This is the letter that I wrote to KBH. Actually, I mailed it to her since she is my senator.

Dear Senator Hutchison,

After viewing your appearance on Meet the Press this past Sunday, I felt compelled to write and note how proud I am to be represented by such a brave and principled woman.

Too often in society, people are cowed by peer pressure to not stand up for their principles. By stating that, &quot;I certainly hope that if there is going to be an indictment that says something happened, that it is an indictment on a crime and not some perjury technicality where they couldn&#039;t indict on the crime,&quot; while defending the Bush Administration staff you showed loyalty - certainly an admirable trait. Then I remembered several statements during the time of the Clinton impeachment hearings in which you said: &quot;The concept of equal justice under law and the importance of absolute truth in legal proceedings is the foundation of our justice system in the courts.&quot; And to explain your vote on the impeachment you said, â€œThe reason that I voted to remove him from office is because I think the overriding issue here is that truth will remain the standard for perjury and obstruction of justice in our criminal justice system and it must not be gray.&quot; These quotes taken together show that you are willing to take a stand for hypocrisy - the principle of having no principles at all.

Children need role-models willing to stand up for difficult principles - like hypocrisy - even when they are unpopular. No doubt, future generations aspiring to political leadership will look to your performance and profit greatly by your example.

And for that, I thank you Senator Hutchison.

Sincerely,

OK... so it&#039;s not really sincere. And satire is usually lost on the GOP. But I just can&#039;t resist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the letter that I wrote to KBH. Actually, I mailed it to her since she is my senator.</p>
<p>Dear Senator Hutchison,</p>
<p>After viewing your appearance on Meet the Press this past Sunday, I felt compelled to write and note how proud I am to be represented by such a brave and principled woman.</p>
<p>Too often in society, people are cowed by peer pressure to not stand up for their principles. By stating that, &#8220;I certainly hope that if there is going to be an indictment that says something happened, that it is an indictment on a crime and not some perjury technicality where they couldn&#8217;t indict on the crime,&#8221; while defending the Bush Administration staff you showed loyalty &#8211; certainly an admirable trait. Then I remembered several statements during the time of the Clinton impeachment hearings in which you said: &#8220;The concept of equal justice under law and the importance of absolute truth in legal proceedings is the foundation of our justice system in the courts.&#8221; And to explain your vote on the impeachment you said, â€œThe reason that I voted to remove him from office is because I think the overriding issue here is that truth will remain the standard for perjury and obstruction of justice in our criminal justice system and it must not be gray.&#8221; These quotes taken together show that you are willing to take a stand for hypocrisy &#8211; the principle of having no principles at all.</p>
<p>Children need role-models willing to stand up for difficult principles &#8211; like hypocrisy &#8211; even when they are unpopular. No doubt, future generations aspiring to political leadership will look to your performance and profit greatly by your example.</p>
<p>And for that, I thank you Senator Hutchison.</p>
<p>Sincerely,</p>
<p>OK&#8230; so it&#8217;s not really sincere. And satire is usually lost on the GOP. But I just can&#8217;t resist.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=193738', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ShawnGBR</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/24/hutchison-flip-flop/comment-page-2/#comment-193661</link>
		<dc:creator>ShawnGBR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2005 11:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=2273#comment-193661</guid>
		<description>I just sent a message on http://hutchison.senate.gov/e-mail.htm (thanks for the link):

&quot; I applaud your views on perjury, madam Senator, when you said (and I quote you from February 1999) &quot;...something needs to be said that is a clear message that our rule of law is intact and the standards for perjury and obstruction of justice are not gray. And I think it is most important that we make that statement and that it be on the record for history.

I very much worry that with the evidence that we have seen that grand juries across America are going to start asking questions about what is obstruction of justice, what is perjury. And I donâ€™t want there to be any lessening of the standard. Because our system of criminal justice depends on people telling the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. That is the lynch pin of our criminal justice system and I donâ€™t want it to be faded in any way.&quot;

Bravo indeed. Perjury is not a gray and faded thing, or a technicality, or a waste of time. Bravo for standing up for what you believe in and not flip-flopping on the issue. At all. Ever. &quot;

The GOP is undergoing the same fate of the British Conservative Party. Taking a country to war and using that to win an election, internal power squabblings, scandals, and now Libby is invoking the Maggie Thatcher &quot;I don&#039;t remember a frigging thing&quot; defense. I should add that the &#039;Tories&#039; in Britain have not been in power for nearly two decades now because of their spin, lies and weasel-like behavior.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just sent a message on <a href="http://hutchison.senate.gov/e-mail.htm" rel="nofollow">http://hutchison.senate.gov/e-mail.htm</a> (thanks for the link):</p>
<p>&#8221; I applaud your views on perjury, madam Senator, when you said (and I quote you from February 1999) &#8220;&#8230;something needs to be said that is a clear message that our rule of law is intact and the standards for perjury and obstruction of justice are not gray. And I think it is most important that we make that statement and that it be on the record for history.</p>
<p>I very much worry that with the evidence that we have seen that grand juries across America are going to start asking questions about what is obstruction of justice, what is perjury. And I donâ€™t want there to be any lessening of the standard. Because our system of criminal justice depends on people telling the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. That is the lynch pin of our criminal justice system and I donâ€™t want it to be faded in any way.&#8221;</p>
<p>Bravo indeed. Perjury is not a gray and faded thing, or a technicality, or a waste of time. Bravo for standing up for what you believe in and not flip-flopping on the issue. At all. Ever. &#8221;</p>
<p>The GOP is undergoing the same fate of the British Conservative Party. Taking a country to war and using that to win an election, internal power squabblings, scandals, and now Libby is invoking the Maggie Thatcher &#8220;I don&#8217;t remember a frigging thing&#8221; defense. I should add that the &#8216;Tories&#8217; in Britain have not been in power for nearly two decades now because of their spin, lies and weasel-like behavior.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=193661', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: esc.anonymice.net &#187; perjury schmurjury</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/24/hutchison-flip-flop/comment-page-2/#comment-190352</link>
		<dc:creator>esc.anonymice.net &#187; perjury schmurjury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2005 19:03:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=2273#comment-190352</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;offering a hint of the attack White House allies will launch on special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald if and when he announces any indictments, Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison dismissed the possible felony indictment of perjury as a mere â€œtechnicality&#8221;&quot; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;offering a hint of the attack White House allies will launch on special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald if and when he announces any indictments, Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison dismissed the possible felony indictment of perjury as a mere â€œtechnicality&#8221;&#8221; [...]<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=190352', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: texaslib</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/24/hutchison-flip-flop/comment-page-2/#comment-189638</link>
		<dc:creator>texaslib</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2005 06:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=2273#comment-189638</guid>
		<description>Hutchison&#039;s behavior is SOP for the GOP.  They have spent much of the last decade inventing rules and then breaking those rules when the rules don&#039;t benefit them.  Hypocrisy 101.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hutchison&#8217;s behavior is SOP for the GOP.  They have spent much of the last decade inventing rules and then breaking those rules when the rules don&#8217;t benefit them.  Hypocrisy 101.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=189638', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: briggs</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/24/hutchison-flip-flop/comment-page-2/#comment-189619</link>
		<dc:creator>briggs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2005 04:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=2273#comment-189619</guid>
		<description>why doesn&#039;t anyone take a deep breath for  a minute and crticize mr. russert for booking this tried and and not so true pitball mouthpiece for the bushs.  she has appears so frequently on the talking head circuit that one wonders if she collects a separate pay check for this seemingly near full time employment.  sure it got russert a story, but what else do you expect when you book huthison except the party line no matter how this weeks bush talking points contradict her earlier statements about perjury when the talking points on the right went the other way.  

only good part about listening to her, is that you get to see how dumb she acutally is and that she and geroge would appear to be sharing the same non-funcitoning brain cell.

another argument in favor or more federal funding for stem cell research!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why doesn&#8217;t anyone take a deep breath for  a minute and crticize mr. russert for booking this tried and and not so true pitball mouthpiece for the bushs.  she has appears so frequently on the talking head circuit that one wonders if she collects a separate pay check for this seemingly near full time employment.  sure it got russert a story, but what else do you expect when you book huthison except the party line no matter how this weeks bush talking points contradict her earlier statements about perjury when the talking points on the right went the other way.  </p>
<p>only good part about listening to her, is that you get to see how dumb she acutally is and that she and geroge would appear to be sharing the same non-funcitoning brain cell.</p>
<p>another argument in favor or more federal funding for stem cell research!<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=189619', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Think Progress &#187; Hutchison Admits Perjury Is A &#8220;Terrible Crime&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/24/hutchison-flip-flop/comment-page-2/#comment-188777</link>
		<dc:creator>Think Progress &#187; Hutchison Admits Perjury Is A &#8220;Terrible Crime&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2005 17:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=2273#comment-188777</guid>
		<description>[...] First, during the Clinton impeachment, she said perjury was important to prosecute because â€œour system of criminal justice depends on people telling the truth.â€ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] First, during the Clinton impeachment, she said perjury was important to prosecute because â€œour system of criminal justice depends on people telling the truth.â€ [...]<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=188777', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spidelblog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Republicans now think Pergury is NO CRIME!</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/24/hutchison-flip-flop/comment-page-2/#comment-188740</link>
		<dc:creator>Spidelblog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Republicans now think Pergury is NO CRIME!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2005 16:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=2273#comment-188740</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=188740', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hpcharlie</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/24/hutchison-flip-flop/comment-page-1/#comment-188695</link>
		<dc:creator>hpcharlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2005 16:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=2273#comment-188695</guid>
		<description>Hello,

This is the letter I faxed to my Cristocratic Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison on Monday.

Thanks,

Charlie C.
Dallas TX

Dear Senator Hutchison,

Did you possibly have an &quot;apparent failure of memory&quot; of what you said in 1999 REGARDING THE IMPEACHMENT OF BILL CLINTON or is it just that YOU ARE SO PATHETICALLY PARTISAN OR MAYBE A â€œFLIP FLOPPER? â€œ

The &quot;CIA Outing of Valerie Plame&quot; is not a &quot;technicality!&quot; Outing a covert- CIA operative is treason and it has &quot;blown the cover&quot; of a whole world-wide CIA operation now making nearly impossible to recruit new CIA operatives world wide since &quot;No One Can Trust The U.S. Government Anymore!&quot; WE ARE NOW LESS SAFE THAN BEFORE 9-11 !!

The GOP seems to think that the only 2 Moral Issues are &quot;Abortion and Gay Marriage.&quot; So tell me Senator Hutchison what makes the following MORAL:

1. Lying to take the U.S. To War in Iraq? 
&quot;Bush wanted to remove Saddam, through military action, justified by the conjunction of terrorism and WMD. But the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy.&quot; AfterDowningStreet.org is a coalition of veterans&#039; groups, peace groups, and political activist groups, which launched on May 26, 2005, a campaign to urge the U.S. Congress to begin a formal investigation into whether President Bush has committed impeachable offenses in connection with the Iraq war. More About Us.... 

2. Killing over 2000 U.S. Soldiers, 1000&#039;s of Iraqi Citizens, not to include the soldiers who were wounded and later died (not reported) which probably is now between 6000-8000 dead soldiers that have come through Dover Air Force Base ....ALL OVER A LIE ???? 

3. Slander and â€œCharacter Assasinationâ€ if one is â€œtelling the truthâ€ and you canâ€™t stand the fact of hearing and knowing the truth ?

I learned the following having been reared in the Lutheran Church what God tells us in The 10 Commandments:

Lying, Stealing, Cheating, and Killing â€œBreak Godâ€™s Law!â€ But apparently, the GOP since 2000 thinks itâ€™s above the Law including â€œGodâ€™s Law,â€ and a Republican â€œCan Do No Wrong! â€ â€œITâ€™S OKAY TO LIE, STEAL, CHEAT, AND KILL AS LONG AS YOU ARE A REPUBLICAN !â€ 

â€œDO HONESTY, INTEGRITY, ETHICS, AND HAVING A MORAL CONSCIOUSNESS MEAN ANYTHING TO YOU SENATOR HUTCHISON?

Charlie C.
Dallas TX</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p>
<p>This is the letter I faxed to my Cristocratic Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison on Monday.</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Charlie C.<br />
Dallas TX</p>
<p>Dear Senator Hutchison,</p>
<p>Did you possibly have an &#8220;apparent failure of memory&#8221; of what you said in 1999 REGARDING THE IMPEACHMENT OF BILL CLINTON or is it just that YOU ARE SO PATHETICALLY PARTISAN OR MAYBE A â€œFLIP FLOPPER? â€œ</p>
<p>The &#8220;CIA Outing of Valerie Plame&#8221; is not a &#8220;technicality!&#8221; Outing a covert- CIA operative is treason and it has &#8220;blown the cover&#8221; of a whole world-wide CIA operation now making nearly impossible to recruit new CIA operatives world wide since &#8220;No One Can Trust The U.S. Government Anymore!&#8221; WE ARE NOW LESS SAFE THAN BEFORE 9-11 !!</p>
<p>The GOP seems to think that the only 2 Moral Issues are &#8220;Abortion and Gay Marriage.&#8221; So tell me Senator Hutchison what makes the following MORAL:</p>
<p>1. Lying to take the U.S. To War in Iraq?<br />
&#8220;Bush wanted to remove Saddam, through military action, justified by the conjunction of terrorism and WMD. But the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy.&#8221; AfterDowningStreet.org is a coalition of veterans&#8217; groups, peace groups, and political activist groups, which launched on May 26, 2005, a campaign to urge the U.S. Congress to begin a formal investigation into whether President Bush has committed impeachable offenses in connection with the Iraq war. More About Us&#8230;. </p>
<p>2. Killing over 2000 U.S. Soldiers, 1000&#8217;s of Iraqi Citizens, not to include the soldiers who were wounded and later died (not reported) which probably is now between 6000-8000 dead soldiers that have come through Dover Air Force Base &#8230;.ALL OVER A LIE ???? </p>
<p>3. Slander and â€œCharacter Assasinationâ€ if one is â€œtelling the truthâ€ and you canâ€™t stand the fact of hearing and knowing the truth ?</p>
<p>I learned the following having been reared in the Lutheran Church what God tells us in The 10 Commandments:</p>
<p>Lying, Stealing, Cheating, and Killing â€œBreak Godâ€™s Law!â€ But apparently, the GOP since 2000 thinks itâ€™s above the Law including â€œGodâ€™s Law,â€ and a Republican â€œCan Do No Wrong! â€ â€œITâ€™S OKAY TO LIE, STEAL, CHEAT, AND KILL AS LONG AS YOU ARE A REPUBLICAN !â€ </p>
<p>â€œDO HONESTY, INTEGRITY, ETHICS, AND HAVING A MORAL CONSCIOUSNESS MEAN ANYTHING TO YOU SENATOR HUTCHISON?</p>
<p>Charlie C.<br />
Dallas TX<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=188695', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leaving Only Footprints &#187; Blog Archive &#187; News Round-Up</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/24/hutchison-flip-flop/comment-page-1/#comment-188349</link>
		<dc:creator>Leaving Only Footprints &#187; Blog Archive &#187; News Round-Up</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2005 13:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=2273#comment-188349</guid>
		<description>[...] With indictments looming over the White House, Senator Hutchinson (R) doesnâ€™t believe perjury to be a crime, that is, unless your name was Clinton. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] With indictments looming over the White House, Senator Hutchinson (R) doesnâ€™t believe perjury to be a crime, that is, unless your name was Clinton. [...]<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=188349', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wake.Up. &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Cheney Knew</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/24/hutchison-flip-flop/comment-page-1/#comment-188326</link>
		<dc:creator>Wake.Up. &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Cheney Knew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2005 12:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=2273#comment-188326</guid>
		<description>[...] If Cheney told another story to the Grand Jury - under oath - about how he learned of Valerie Plame&#8217;s name and position within the CIA, then that&#8217;s perjury. And in spite of what that joke of a U.S. Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison would have you believe, perjury is a crime. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If Cheney told another story to the Grand Jury &#8211; under oath &#8211; about how he learned of Valerie Plame&#8217;s name and position within the CIA, then that&#8217;s perjury. And in spite of what that joke of a U.S. Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison would have you believe, perjury is a crime. [...]<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=188326', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cyra Brown</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/24/hutchison-flip-flop/comment-page-1/#comment-188283</link>
		<dc:creator>Cyra Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2005 09:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=2273#comment-188283</guid>
		<description>In Kay Bailey Hutcinson&#039;s sworn declaration on 2/12/99, she said &quot;Willful,corrupt,and false sworn testimony before a Federal grand jury is a separate and distinct crime under applicable law, and is material and perjurious if it is capable of influencing the grand jury in any matter before it, including any collateral matters that it may consider. See Title 18, Section 1623,U.S. Code, and Federal court cases interpreting that section.&quot; Perhaps a few gentle taps with a cattle prod would &quot;jolt&quot; her memory. My goodness Kay, What Would Jesus Say ?!?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Kay Bailey Hutcinson&#8217;s sworn declaration on 2/12/99, she said &#8220;Willful,corrupt,and false sworn testimony before a Federal grand jury is a separate and distinct crime under applicable law, and is material and perjurious if it is capable of influencing the grand jury in any matter before it, including any collateral matters that it may consider. See Title 18, Section 1623,U.S. Code, and Federal court cases interpreting that section.&#8221; Perhaps a few gentle taps with a cattle prod would &#8220;jolt&#8221; her memory. My goodness Kay, What Would Jesus Say ?!?<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=188283', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/24/hutchison-flip-flop/comment-page-1/#comment-188254</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2005 06:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=2273#comment-188254</guid>
		<description>Sen. Hutchison was extremely critical of  Bill Clinton a number of years ago since he &quot;didn&#039;t have an exit strategy for Kosovo&quot;.
Her hypocrisy knows no bounds.
Larry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sen. Hutchison was extremely critical of  Bill Clinton a number of years ago since he &#8220;didn&#8217;t have an exit strategy for Kosovo&#8221;.<br />
Her hypocrisy knows no bounds.<br />
Larry<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=188254', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Munir Munshey</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/24/hutchison-flip-flop/comment-page-1/#comment-188223</link>
		<dc:creator>Munir Munshey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2005 05:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=2273#comment-188223</guid>
		<description>when they condone perjury one wonders.

Have they themselves been committing perjury?  Why else would they say it is a mere technicality?   If they really believe lying under oath is fine, imagine how much lying they are capable of, when not under oath!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>when they condone perjury one wonders.</p>
<p>Have they themselves been committing perjury?  Why else would they say it is a mere technicality?   If they really believe lying under oath is fine, imagine how much lying they are capable of, when not under oath!<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=188223', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GOPHater</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/24/hutchison-flip-flop/comment-page-1/#comment-188203</link>
		<dc:creator>GOPHater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2005 04:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=2273#comment-188203</guid>
		<description>Just another Texas politician that should be taken to the woodshed and beat to within an inch of their life.  First in line, of course, should be the bug man.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just another Texas politician that should be taken to the woodshed and beat to within an inch of their life.  First in line, of course, should be the bug man.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=188203', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: democommie</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/24/hutchison-flip-flop/comment-page-1/#comment-188195</link>
		<dc:creator>democommie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2005 03:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=2273#comment-188195</guid>
		<description>REPUBLICANS ENDORSE PERJURY? It is comforting to know that over half of our country&#039;s leaders may have no qualms about lying to our other leaders, lying to our judges (under oath), and lying to our faces.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>REPUBLICANS ENDORSE PERJURY? It is comforting to know that over half of our country&#8217;s leaders may have no qualms about lying to our other leaders, lying to our judges (under oath), and lying to our faces.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=188195', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blue State Journal &#187; Rampant Hypocrisy</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/24/hutchison-flip-flop/comment-page-1/#comment-188103</link>
		<dc:creator>Blue State Journal &#187; Rampant Hypocrisy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2005 02:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=2273#comment-188103</guid>
		<description>[...] If you follow the link above to KOS, you&#8217;ll see all the legions of Republicans who felt that, at least for Bill Clinton, spending $50 million on an investigation, and only coming up with perjury was just fine with them and was also a serious, serious crime that did severe damage to the country. So what did Hutchinson herself say back then? Surely she had similar thoughts about Bill Clinton&#8217;s perjury? That maybe Ken Starr couldn&#8217;t indict any crime, so he just went with a perjury technicality just to show that his years of investigation wasn&#8217;t a waste of time and taxpayer dollars? Well, let&#8217;s just take a look, shall we? Here&#8217;s what she said, from Think Progress: [S]omething needs to be said that is a clear message that our rule of law is intact and the standards for perjury and obstruction of justice are not gray. And I think it is most important that we make that statement and that it be on the record for history. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If you follow the link above to KOS, you&#8217;ll see all the legions of Republicans who felt that, at least for Bill Clinton, spending $50 million on an investigation, and only coming up with perjury was just fine with them and was also a serious, serious crime that did severe damage to the country. So what did Hutchinson herself say back then? Surely she had similar thoughts about Bill Clinton&#8217;s perjury? That maybe Ken Starr couldn&#8217;t indict any crime, so he just went with a perjury technicality just to show that his years of investigation wasn&#8217;t a waste of time and taxpayer dollars? Well, let&#8217;s just take a look, shall we? Here&#8217;s what she said, from Think Progress: [S]omething needs to be said that is a clear message that our rule of law is intact and the standards for perjury and obstruction of justice are not gray. And I think it is most important that we make that statement and that it be on the record for history. [...]<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=188103', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
