Think Progress

Did Chalabi’s Visit Compromise the FBI Investigation?

Senators Patrick Leahy, Ted Kennedy and Dick Durbin just sent a letter to Attorney General Gonzales with some important questions about Ahmed Chalabi’s visit to Washington D.C. The Senators appear concerned that Chalabi’s visit could compromise the FBI investigation into allegations that Chalabi passed classified information to Iran:

1. In light of the ongoing FBI investigation, were you notified by the White House of Mr. Chalabi’s visit? Before his schedule was finalized, did you have an opportunity to advise the White House about whether it was appropriate for Mr. Chalabi to meet with Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, Treasury Secretary John Snow, and possibly with Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, National Security Advisor Stephen Hadley and Vice President Richard Cheney?

2. What steps, if any, have been taken to ensure that Mr. Chalabi’s meetings with senior administration officials do not compromise or prejudice the ongoing FBI investigation into allegations that Mr. Chalabi passed classified national security information to Iran?

3. Will the FBI interview Mr. Chalabi during his visit to the United States? If not, why not?

4. What is the current status of the FBI’s investigation into Mr. Chalabi’s conduct?

You can read the full text of the letter here.



55 Responses to “Did Chalabi’s Visit Compromise the FBI Investigation?”

  1. Zookeeper says:

    Excellent. Anybody think they’ll get an answer?


  2. Average TV Viewer says:

    This bears repeating:

    There are many people like myself who have gone their whole lives happy with a Republican or a Democrat, able to see the advantages of both. But that is not what is going on here. The GOP have been hijacked. And the middle of the roaders have had enough. If the Neocons keep parading as conservatives they will do permanent damage to the GOP.


  3. Pete Bogs says:

    I imagine it did, and that’s why it happened right now… timing is too coincidental, and the fact they’d even host him now is just plain weird…


  4. Alan says:

    #2: ATV: There are those of us who would argue that the neocons ARE the GOP now. The GOP you knew no longer exists, just as the Democratic party of the segregated south no longer exists.


  5. cynicon implant says:

    I hope Gonzales ignores these blowhards. I am from MA and am perptually embarassed by Teddy the fat drunk. His behavior on the judiciary committee has been outrageous.


  6. Judd says:

    It’s revealing that the only comment to this letter is an ad hominem attack on Ted Kennedy. Must have hit a nerve.


  7. Spudge_Boy says:

    Judd, this is par for the course for the trolls here. They don’t post on topic or even relating a story to the topic.

    You should kill posts that are the old ad hominem attack or the old fashion “It was Clinton’s fault.

    It’s not censorship if you are trying to keep topics…..on topic.

    If you guys do a Story on Steven’s Bridge To Nowhere and somebody posts that Hillary Clinton has smeely breath, delete that sh!t. It has nothing to do with the topic and is a stupid ad hominem attack.


  8. cynicon implant says:

    No Judd, it wasn’t this particular item that hit a nerve — it’s an accumulation of Kennedy crap that has pushed me to this point. This is just another example of the attack politics that Kennedy plays constantly –and no one in the media ever calls him on it. I’m just more sick of him than most because I have to live with the fawning Boston media going out of their way to ignore his outrageous behavior — political and otherwise.


  9. Chris in AZ says:

    “#5 I hope Gonzales ignores these blowhards. I am from MA and am perptually embarassed by Teddy the fat drunk. His behavior on the judiciary committee has been outrageous.

    Comment by cynicon implant — November 9, 2005 @ 5:24 pm”

    Your comment has nothing to do with the content of the letter, have you read it? what stated in this letter embarassed you? what is outragous?


  10. War4Sale says:

    What good purpose could a visit from Chalabi possibly have?

    The man is a convicted felon who passed fraudulent ‘intelligence’ to our nation and is accused by the CIA of being an Iranian spy!

    Chalabi should be visiting a small cell in Gitmo right now, not staying in a five star hotel and meeting with Cheney and Rice!


  11. Chris in AZ says:

    It is about time the Dems stand up and question what the administration is doing…”attack politics”? no questioning the DOJ on an investigation is following up, and holding offices accountable…it isn’t attacking to question authority…just like it is not unpatriotict to question a bs war


  12. Average TV Viewer says:

    #4 Alan-The GOP are riding the same 911 hysteria the Dems did, AND making money at the same time. They’ll flounder. I honestly think many people have a healthy denial of the intentions of PNAC, and those associated with it. It can’t last forever. But I’m open to the idea that I’m wrong, for sure.


  13. Jane E. Schneider says:

    Maybe Chalabi is here for a shoe-shopping spree with Condi.


  14. David says:

    You should kill posts that are the old ad hominem attack

    But, if ad homien attacks are banned, what will the trolls have to talk about? How can anyone expect the trolls to argue the facts and issues if they can’t blame a Clinton?


  15. Wayne A. Schneider says:

    Is the Justice Department going to investigate the “coincidence” that Vice President’s good buddy Chalabi (I spelled it right this time) may have passed classified information to the Iranians, that the Vice President’s Chief of Staff might have passed classified information to a pseudo-journalist (Novak), and that the Vice President had a meeting with a bunch of GOP senators and then classified information leaked out of that meeting?

    I don’t know about any of you, but it sure looks like the Vice President is involved with a lot of classified information leaks. Can we let a jury decide his guilt?

    Could the Vice President be the leaker that the President has been searching for? (And Mr. President, he’s not under the desk.)


  16. Marie says:

    I am sure they and their letter will be snubbed, ignored and dismissed, but they were right to send it; their questions are valid and deserve answers. We just know that this White House doesn’t answer legitimate questions from Democrats.
    And What’s up with the FBI — why aren’t they investigting this more vigorously? Pressure from the White House? Cheney been there lately?


  17. The Fly-man says:

    Again, this is purely about TRANSPARENCY in our Govt. Cheney’s administration
    has decided that it is best that people not necessarily need to know what his plans
    are, for the terrorists would take the advantage, and some how, he can’t tell you now, and just trust him, he will save THE EMPIRE,from a catastrophe. We as a collective whole are not of any particular brilliance or certainly not perceptive to the level of danger we are in to warrant an open forum style debate on the future of how are resources are to be squandered. Yes it’s true, a dozen some odd men and one woman know so much better than any collection of ELECTED representatives how are future is to be determined. I think he has seen the movie the Patriot way too many times.We are way too ignorant to handle the truth. It is a sad day when we are more worried about the danger our own government can inflict on us than that of our enemies. Let the conservatives run their gig and when enough citizens wake up and say what the hell did I vote for
    they will at least have an idea of what they don’t want from THEIR governtment.


  18. the composter says:

    BREAKING: Chalabi says Bring it On!

    AP http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,1280,-5404172,00.html

    So when does the grilling start? GOP should be glad to set the record straight.


  19. WaltTheMan says:

    Traitors (and enemies) of a feather flock together.


  20. AvengingAngel says:

    For background on White House and Republican stonewalling on the uses – and misuses – of pre-war Iraq intelligence, see:

    - “Roberts’ Iraq Stonewall Crumbles”

    - “Fitzgerald and the Truth About Pre-War Iraq Intelligence”


  21. Jesus Christ God of WAR says:

    Maybe Chalabi is here one ruse and will be arrested and jailed for his crimes? Maybe the US made a deal with Jordan to turn him over for crimes Chalabi committed there?

    Oh. Sorry. These are the NeoCon Whack-jobs who are running (or attempting to run) our formerly great country… :-(


  22. Ryan Neat says:

  23. Average TV Viewer says:

    Seems the Neocons are foiling all the terrist attacks except for the big ones. Hmmm…Surely SOMEONE SOMEWHERE knows where Zawahiri or Zarkawi is…Ahhh, screw that. Fire up the napalm!


  24. Ryan Neat says:

    “Detonating a White Phosphorous shell in a confined area (like firing into a building) will indeed cause an effect comparable to the use of lung agent poison gases for those inside who do not or can not flee, with the additional consequence of setting the room(s) alight. Death will occur from lung edema, phosphoric acid poisoning or the resulting shock, or burns.”

    Use of white phosphorus is not banned by name in any international treaty. However, the 1980 Convention on Conventional Weapons (Protocol III) prohibits the use of incendiary weapons against civilian populations or in areas that have high civilian populations. The United States is among several nations that are not signatories to the convention.

    PDF of the military story is here.


  25. The Muse says:

    Of course this will result in little more than the press coverage, but God bless them anyway for their ever-growing gonads.

    New on EWM: “Rove out, Rover in.”
    Scaled down agenda includes a “war on gingivitis” and plans to occupy Aruba.


  26. Average TV Viewer says:

    I can’t bring myself to watch the video, Ryan.


  27. Mary Poppin says:

    Why is this man in our country? He needs to be arrested.


  28. Susan says:

    The Dems are pressing on in order to bring light to the criminal Chalabi. Most American’s never heard of him and his crimes.

    This is another story of how the Bushie administration supports criminals.

    The more people who know of Chalabi, the harder the Bushie Administration falls.

    We proved it at the polls yesterday.


  29. Magnum DB says:

    It saddens me to think how many Americans will hear this and not think about how the Republicans constantly try and say the Democrats want to give aid to the terrorists and support the terrorists by implementing our ideas, yet at the same time we have Bush holding hands with the Saudi leader, Rumsfeld shaking hands with Saddam, and now having Chalabi over for a visit.

    Can’t anyone see how all the people that Bush is inviting over are terrorists in their own right?


  30. Ryan Neat says:

    MagnumDB,

    Lets not forget that Republicans sold the WMDs to Iraq. Republicans sold the plutonium reactors to Iran. Republicans helped train, recruit, fund AlQueda to fight the russians!

    Republicans are the friends of (and in fact themselves) terrorists!


  31. David B says:

    Right on #27, once again Cheney is above the law and thumbs his nose at us all. He brings in an enemy of the state and parades him around like the prodical son. Chalabi should have been arrested and held for questioning by the FBI. This administration is nothing but corruption, cronysm, and criminals. After yesterday’s victorys at the pols for Dems, watch the distance between Bush and congressional Republican’s grow even wider.


  32. Ryan Neat says:

    DavidB,

    In a way I hope your wrong. I think bush should stick as close to the congressional candidates as he can – I can’t imagine a better campaign aid for democrats :)


  33. Magnum DB says:

    Thanks for the extra examples, Ryan! I didn’t even think about those. And if I didn’t think about them, I don’t assume regular non-obsessed-with-politics Americans would think about them either.


  34. Peace Lover says:

    From the Guardian article, I find this most destressing:

    “The Iraqi army, Chalabi said, had no more potent weapons than submachine guns while the country is surrounded by neighbors with large weapons arsenals.”

    So I’m thinking he’s thinking, that he’s in line for some weaponary!


  35. Ryan Neat says:

    DavidB,

    Unfortunately those examples are the tip of the iceberg for republican failures. Republicans were behind the overthrow of a democracy in Iran, to institute the Shah to have ‘better control’ under Eisenhower. Republicans were behind Coup D’etats in Argentina and Chile. Then we have the Hostage for Oil, and Iran/Contra fiasco where republican backed CIA operations were selling drugs on american soil to fund illegal central american wars.

    The list of disreputable and irresponsible acts from republicans are as long as one can see. While I’ll grant that republicans are not the only ones who made foreign policy mistakes – the REALLY BIG MISTAKES are almost universally republican!


  36. Jamie says:

    There has to be some secret motivation for him to come here right now. Perhaps it is to screw up the investigation. The dirty trickier of this administration leaves nothing to shame.

    Jamie
    http://intoxination.blogspot.com


  37. cynicon implant says:

    My bad, it did hit a nerve.

    I am ashamed to be a fan of these war criminals!

    Send the WH administration to one of their seceret concentration camps and lets torture the truth out of them.


  38. Greg Priddy says:

    Speaking of Chalabi, I posted on my blog this evening about indications of renewed collusion between him and Iran against other Shi’ite politicians and Ayatollah Sistani.


  39. Susan says:

    I hope ThinkProgress will continue to post articles about Chalabi. Cheney and Condi’s love for him proves they are traitors.

    Post as much as you can Judd, most Americans do not know of this conspiracy between the White House and Chalabi to destroy America.


  40. Lavender says:

    Good ole Dick Durbin. He just doesn’t give a damn what anyone thinks apparently. I love having him and Obama representing my state.


  41. Susan says:

    I agree Lavender. Durbin and Obama are the best of the bunch. I write to them all the time and tell them to begin impeachment hearings. They are both open to it but haven’t said so publically. They are waiting for their constituents to demand in large numbers. If you haven’t demanded impeachment you should. They’re listening.



  42. kjlovell says:

    Chialabi, Iran, Condi, Dumbya….

    Can you say against American Interests?

    Can you say Arms/Oil/Terror States?


  43. Pete Bogs says:

    it also compromised Bush’s credibility even further…


  44. Mary Poppin says:

    Why is this guy meeting with John Snow the Treasury Secretary?


  45. Pablo in Mexico says:

    The Bush administration and the RNC gave Chalabi millions of dollars for his lies about the capabilities of Hussein.

    He probably came over to see Snow and get his next payment.

    This war has cost the puke treasure chest billions of dollars and me thinks they are just about ready to pull the plug on any more financing.


  46. WaltTheMan says:

    Chialabi is the next Saddam. W’s exit plan is to install him, announce the war in Iraq as a triumph and then pull the troops home. This trip is for planning strategy up to and after the “election”. Expect immense fraud on December 15th (perhaps Diebold will get a no-bid contract to supply the machines). In about three years Chialabi will be forced by Islamic fundamentalists to take the same career move as did the Shah of Iran in 1979.


  47. progressive and proud says:

    I am most sure you are 100% correct, Walt. This administration couldn’t reign in Saddam any longer. It is merely time for the next installation. We are at war now because Saddam got uppity and actually believed he ruled Iraq. But, hey, over 2000 dead Americans and countless innocent civilians in Iraq and VOILA, we showed him. Problem is, Chalabi is even worse, but as long as he does as he is told by this administration, then he can be Prime Minister.

    QUID PRO QUO – Welcome to Bushland.

    How can anyone think this is okay? Chalabi has the goods on Bushco and vice versa. This is exactly the way the Mafia works, well, except the Mafia has some odd version of honor and these guys don’t.

    Chalabi=Saddam – the only difference is their outfit.


  48. liberal elite says:

    This is a potentially great blog because it has news items like this important letter from the Judiciary Dems about Chalabi. The problem is that the commentary digressed into schoolyard bickering. If asking your government questions is “attack politics,” you ain’t seen nothin’ yet.

    How much longer are the American people going to let their country and their children’s future be despoiled by these ‘cons?


  49. Marie says:

    Sounds logical to me WtM #48. We’ve been down that path before — we know the way now.


  50. Hackthemedia.com says:

    Strange Days at the American Enterprise Institute

    Judging from various first person accounts of Ahmed Chalabi’s speech at the AEI, the event was palpably weird…


  51. Tom3 says:

    Further proof that the Chimpy regime is criminal.

    The intelligent Republicans are dumping these crooks.

    That leaves only the crooks and brain dead dumbasses like cynicon implant.


  52. purvis ames says:

    Doesn’t the United States have an extradition agreement with Jordan? Chalabi has been tried and found guilty of massive bank fraud in that country and sentenced to twenty-two years in prison. He may be a “deputy prime minister” but he’s also a fugitive who would be arrested imnmediately if he went and visited his neighbors next door.


  53. drugs says:

    drugs…

    evaluative lighting calfskin airlines repenting impassive,Draconian abolishes firmed birth control pills http://birth-control-pills.metasart.com/


  54. The Long Goodbye » Blog Archive » They are acting when they talk about it and they know it is acting to be particular about it and yet: They all want to play Hamlet says:

    [...] Chalabi was under investigation for passing information to the Iranians, but I guess the right-wing blogs and the MSM is too busy with important matters like a certain Democratic congressman's traffic accident to be concerned about that. Quite a coincidence that the investigation of Chalabi cooled once far right stalwart John Negroponte became Director of National Intelligence. [...]



Jump to Top

About Think Progress | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy (off-site) | RSS | Donate
© 2005-2009 Center for American Progress Action Fund
View Most Popular

Advertisement

What We're About

Featured

image
Subscribe to the Progress Report



imageTopic Cloud


Visit Our Affiliated Sites

image image
Reports


Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.

Name:
Email:
Tip:
(required)


imageArchives


imageBlog Roll