Rightie Slayer

Yes, Ms. Wilson WAS covert, and the law protecting her identity has limits. Is this material? Only in the context of McClellan’s comment which serves to show how off-the-mark he was.

Mr. McClellan acknowledged the truth about Rove and Libby’s history, which he had previously repudiated citing personal assurance from both men that they had not engaged in any such conversations. Scotty could have pounced on the grammatical errors in the reporter’s question as an opportunity to avoid the issue using standard PR tactics. Instead his words had to be changed to protect the continuity of previous lies.

The issue before us is whether the Bush Whitehouse should be held to a higher ethical standard than it has managed so far. Clearly, whoever edited the transcript of this press conference missed the mandatory reeducation meetings dictated by President Bush.

Who is responsible for this Bu__ Sh__, and why is no one in the press calling for their head on pike?!

The 15-month proconsulship of the CPA disbursed nearly $20 billion, two-thirds of it in cash, most of which came from the Development Fund for Iraq that had replaced the UN Oil for Food Program and from frozen and seized Iraqi assets. Most of the money was flown into Iraq on C-130s in huge plastic shrink-wrapped pallets holding 40 “cashpaks,” each cashpak having $1.6 million in $100 bills. Twelve billion dollars moved that way between May 2003 and June 2004, drawn from accounts administered by the New York Federal Reserve Bank. The $100 bills weighed an estimated 363 tons.

Once in Iraq, there was virtually no accountability over how the money was spent. There was also considerable money “off the books,” including as much as $4 billion from illegal oil exports. The CPA and the Iraqi State Oil Marketing Board, which it controlled, made a deliberate decision not to record or “meter” oil exports, an invitation to wholesale fraud and black marketeering.

Thus the country was awash in unaccountable money. British sources report that the CPA contracts that were not handed out to cronies were sold to the highest bidder, with bribes as high as $300,000 being demanded for particularly lucrative reconstruction contracts.

An Aside~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Say Didnt Barbara Bush once threaten to kill anyone whom criticized her flock of Dyslexics?

It never ceases to amaze me how potentially fun it must be to purposely misspell someone’s alias. I mean, how many times has someone spelled my alias wrong on this thread? Why do you guys do that? Are you THAT bored? Anyways…

“You claim you aren’t a REPUGnican, but your statements prove otherwise.”

Which statement proves I am Republican? There is none, you just have a hard time dealing with the fact that someone who is probably very much like-minded as you hasn’t gulped up all the propaganda they were fed.

“We were lied into this war. We were told that Iraq was planning to get nukes, they used chemical weapons (ones we sold them) and they were linked to Al-Queda…….

Dumbya lied to us all, and we swallowed!”

Oh, so that retard Bush managed to fool you? Wow, who’s stupid now? LOL. Were we lied to? Go and look at what Bill Clinton was saying when he was prez. Al Gore. Hillary. Kerry. Schumer. Almost every single damn Democrat senator and Clinton administration official said it. Madeline Albright. Sandy Berger. Even Joseph Wilson believed we would find WMDs. Did all of these people lie?

Or are you going to stick to the lame story about Bush somehow fooling all of these people? If they were all fooled, doesn’t that mean they are a bunch of retards? How can someone get fooled by Bush? Isn’t his IQ like 80-something? ;) ;)

“We are currently prosecuting Sadam for using those same chemical weapons we sold him on his own people.”

OK, that sentence doesn’t make sense since you are apparently illiterate… but I’ll give a stab at it. We did not sell Saddam Hussein any chemical weapons. We gave him some loan guarantees. American companies started to build an ethylene plant for Saddam Hussein but it was never finished due to the invasion of Kuwait. We sold him some helicopters. We have never sold Saddam Hussein any chemical weapons. If you believe that, you are a sucker. If you really think we did, please get a cite of your information and email it to me (we don’t need to clutter up this thread with any more tangents). I will have a reasonable, civil, and calm debate with any of you on whether or not we sold Saddam Hussein chemical weapons if you so wish. The truth is that we didn’t, and any claim to the contrary is propaganda furthered to absolve Saddam Hussein of any blame for what he did, furthered by anti-war zealots like George Galloway.

“This administration that “does not torture, but reserves the right to do so” and has concentration camps!!!!!….. is”

Concentration camps? Please. Jails? Yes. Prisons? Yes. Concentration camps? No. Please consult a dictionary and get back to reality.

“USING CHEMICAL WEAPONS ON THE PEOPLE OF IRAQ …..

MK77

So, you still happy you love bush?”

MK77 is not a chemical weapon anymore than any other bomb used by the US military. Chemical weapons are weapons which inflict their damage due to chemical properties. MK77 is an incendiary weapon because it inflicts damage due to heat/explosion. Again, consult a dictionary and get educated. You might as well call a car a “chemical weapon” because it has chemicals in it and can kill you.

And no, I don’t love Bush. Nice try to project though, since you hate him.

“As someone that knows people that work covertly, you NEVER TELL SOMEONE….”

Uh yeah, but now the cat is out of the bag honey. LOL.

“Fitz said (and you can deny this all you want) she was a covert or undercover agent. CLUE: read BETWEEN THE LINES!!!!!!!!!!”

LOL. Read between the lines? Yeah, I see that’s the standard method of “scientific” method used by people such as yourselves. If something doesn’t say what you want, claim it does anyways!

I don’t care if Fitzy was hinting that Valerie was a covert agent, which she was in the non-legal definition of the term.

Fitzgerald never said that she was. Period.

David Gregory claimed Fitzgerald said she was, and if you look at the transcript, he never says any such thing.

PS. It has become obviously apparent to me that I am debating juveniles for the most part. I think most of you people should take some more schooling and learn more at school and stop hanging around political forums until you actually have skills such as: logic, critical thinking skills, familiarity with the scientific method, etc.

Comment by Ryan Neat

I thought it was you at first but then figured even at 3AM you’d still be out closing down the gay bars.

Long live Bush! He and Hitler were the true leaders!

If you ain’t white, you ain’t right!!!!!

Comment by i-right-i — November 11, 2005 @ 3:36 am

Just a note…only a drunken stalker stays up to the near break of dawn to manufacture false posts. It’s just another facet of the Filthy Left…..who can’t spell.

You miss the point: David Gregory’s statement was INACCURATE.

Let’s look at the question posed by NBC’s White House Correspondent David Gregory to which McClellan responded to:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/relea…051031-3.html#

GREGORY: Whether there’s a question of legality, we know for a fact that there was involvement. We know that Karl Rove, based on what he and his lawyer have said, did have a conversation about somebody who Patrick Fitzgerald said was a covert officer of the Central Intelligence Agency. (at this point, McClellan speaks over Gregory and says, “I don’t think that’s accurate) We know that Scooter Libby also had conversations.

Now….Gregory says that Fitzgerald said the person was a COVERT officer of the CIA.

Well, let’s look at what Patrick Fitzgerald himself said in his Press Conferance:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn…102801340.html

FITZGERALD: Let me say two things. Number one, I am not speaking to whether or not Valerie Wilson was COVERT.

So David Gregory says that Fitzgerald said that Valerie Plame was covert…and Fitzgerald says he IS NOT SPEAKING to whether or not she was covert.

So was Gregory accurate or NOT accurate??

It’s apparent that the correct response to Gregory’s question is:

“I don’t think that’s accurate”

Gregory was INCORRECT and for anyone to agree that he was ACCURATE would ALSO BE INCORRECT.

McClellan CORRECTED him.

He also said he remembered a particularly odious habit Bush repeatedly exhibited in his class. During a class discussion Bush would at times deny something he had just said in the same class, even only ten minutes before he denied having said it. He and the other students in that class found this habit extremely annoying.

It appears Bush has promulgated some of his own worst personal habits throughout his administration. This one is reminiscent of Stalin’s perverse habit of having any photos which included his new “enemies” altered to remove them and the original (unaltered) copies rounded up and destroyed — after having executed those enemies, of course. Some peasants in West Russia were even executed for hiding some of the old unaltered copies. It appears that Bush is no different in spirit from old Joe.

You are a so total dumb ass…..

As someone that knows people that work covertly, you NEVER TELL SOMEONE….

I AM A COVERT AGENT….I WORK AT THE CIA….WINK WINK…DON’T TELL ANYONE!

You are such a twit!

1. She worked at the CIA
2. She had a front job – Brewster Jennings
3. Brewster Jennings – not a real company
4. Showed up for work EVERY DAY AT CIA HQ.
5. Fitz said (and you can deny this all you want) she was a covert or undercover agent. CLUE: read BETWEEN THE LINES!!!!!!!!!!

REPUGnicans only see the things they like!

We are currently prosecuting Sadam for using those same chemical weapons we sold him on his own people.

AND

This administration that “does not torture, but reserves the right to do so” and has concentration camps!!!!!….. is

IS

USING CHEMICAL WEAPONS ON THE PEOPLE OF IRAQ …..

MK77

So, you still happy you love bush?