Comments on: BREAKING: Hadley Being Coy About Whether He’s Woodward’s Source

By: Mark Marco

Mark Marco — Sat, 19 Nov 2005 20:03:04 +0000

I’m calling the reichwing cabal to warn them, Marie is getting a really weird feeling! That CAN’T be good…..

By: Marie

Marie — Fri, 18 Nov 2005 22:51:30 +0000

Have you ever watched Hadley — I remember him from his background position when Rice was NSA. He took the fall for the 16 words in the SOTUS; but he was always trying to be unnoticed — a real behind-the-scenes guy. Now that he has spoken on tv several times, I get a really weird feeling when I see him.
He can’t be trusted.

By: Marie

Marie — Fri, 18 Nov 2005 22:47:15 +0000

Fitsgerald is convening another grand jury. His modus operandi is to indict the #2 man, squeeze him for all he is able, and then to after the kingfish. Raw Story believes Hadley is the original leaker — he used to work for Rice until she went to State, now he is NSA.
I am still hopeful that Cheney is the big fish.
Bush seems to be suffering stress, and I think he will crack if Rove and/or Cheney has to go.
These guys are all playing fast and loose with the law, with ethics and morality — they lack all moral sensibilities, have no ethical code — they are as corrupt as any mafia family or street gang or band of criminals as we have ever seen in this country.
What they have going for them is an extremely tight and cohesive network; what we have going for us is the truth and the standard of conduct we expect from our officials.

By: Mike T.

Mike T. — Fri, 18 Nov 2005 17:39:55 +0000

Steven Hadley is also the guy who’s hiding the “Able Danger” information from Curt Weldon!

By: The Subjective Scribe

The Subjective Scribe — Fri, 18 Nov 2005 16:41:13 +0000

Devious doubletalking deceiver or blathering…

National Security Advisor Stephen Hadley’s tapdancing around a reporter’s question puts White House spokesliar Scott McClellan to shame. It’s a rare mastery of doubletalk that allows someone to use so many words to say absolutely nothing at all. Thi…

By: Tony W

Tony W — Fri, 18 Nov 2005 16:30:48 +0000

#11 Woodward doesn’t have any reputation left to protect..The man drank the Bushie Kool-Aid and became a lying scumbag..

By: Zookeeper

Zookeeper — Fri, 18 Nov 2005 16:10:05 +0000

I’d like to see him being coy in front of Fitzgerald.

By: Dr. Strangelove

Dr. Strangelove — Fri, 18 Nov 2005 16:04:13 +0000

Why don’t we simply torture these nice folks to pursuade them to tell the truth? Of course, by that I mean only the approved methods of torture-aka-torture-lite. Sounds fair, right..little water boarding, little rabid dog in the face..little masturbation, simulated oral copulation, nude charades, all the kinky games the Right likes to play. Fiends.

By: Peteykins

Peteykins — Fri, 18 Nov 2005 15:39:20 +0000

Hadley has always struck me as being realllllly strange; like really a freak.

By: kindness

kindness — Fri, 18 Nov 2005 15:18:54 +0000

C’mon, we all know this was orchestrated out of VP Cheney’s office. They are just trying to drag it out beyond the ‘06 elections so they don’t lose both the House AND the Senate.

I want the big Kahuna. Indict Cheney. make the sad sack of shit resign (not that he’d have the integrity to do so, he doesn’t).

Happy weekend everyone.

By: hardass

hardass — Fri, 18 Nov 2005 15:11:14 +0000

more on #7 , Woodward will spill the beans . This guy , can’t wait to unload the secrets he’s privy to . After all he is a journalist , his profession is to tell , he is no Amstrong Williams , he has a reputation to protect.

By: Jay

Jay — Fri, 18 Nov 2005 15:11:06 +0000

Tell it to the prosecutor smartass!

By: mysticagent

mysticagent — Fri, 18 Nov 2005 15:10:09 +0000

Wait. Press reports from the WH? Is that the same as “orders”? In other words, the WH is telling him to ‘hold the line’ – and he’s smart enough not to deny it, because if there is evidence against him it becomes damning to have denied it, and if there is no concrete evidence, he is probably in the clear, as long as he doesn’t incriminate himself. It’s tough to maintain a complex web of lies. And a few strands have already been pulled….

By: Average TV Viewer

Average TV Viewer — Fri, 18 Nov 2005 15:03:47 +0000

His reply is basically :I don’t know, was I?

More hubris from the criminals.

By: hardass

hardass — Fri, 18 Nov 2005 14:53:01 +0000

i agree it’s smoke screen .More manipulation of the media . I have a feeling , only a gut feeling , Fitzgerald will bring the motives : the war in Iraq to the forefront.How can he bypass the issue , it becomes the scope of his investigations. The modus vivendi is subordinate to the end . Can the end justify the means ? Not in a democracy .

By: jjw

jjw — Fri, 18 Nov 2005 14:37:37 +0000

It could just be a smoke screen. He could be just throwing people off the trail of someone else (like Cheney or Bush).

By: Average TV Viewer

Average TV Viewer — Fri, 18 Nov 2005 14:25:48 +0000

Must suck being a criminal with the fuzz on your tail.

By: WC

WC — Fri, 18 Nov 2005 14:23:32 +0000

It depends on what the meaning of “conversation” is, as well as “source” and “press reports” and “false statements” and “treason,” to name a few.

By: Wayne A. Schneider

Wayne A. Schneider — Fri, 18 Nov 2005 14:17:11 +0000

#1 Pete, Are you sure it doesn’t depend on what the meaning of “it” is? :)

By: digger

digger — Fri, 18 Nov 2005 14:16:18 +0000

It’s Hadley. And he’s going down.