<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Times of London: Woodwardâ€™s Source Was Hadley</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thinkprogress.org/2005/11/20/woodward-hadley/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/11/20/woodward-hadley/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 15:20:23 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Malinda Church</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/11/20/woodward-hadley/comment-page-1/#comment-239441</link>
		<dc:creator>Malinda Church</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 17:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2005/11/20/times-of-london-woodward%e2%80%99s-source-was-hadley/#comment-239441</guid>
		<description>Regarding #25----Hadley working for Rice would put Hadley in a position to have access to information---information Hadley should have and not have.

Why was Hadley&#039;s cover blown is the question-------not who did it-----the why is the most important imo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding #25&#8212;-Hadley working for Rice would put Hadley in a position to have access to information&#8212;information Hadley should have and not have.</p>
<p>Why was Hadley&#8217;s cover blown is the question&#8212;&#8212;-not who did it&#8212;&#8211;the why is the most important imo.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=239441', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seefleur</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/11/20/woodward-hadley/comment-page-1/#comment-239099</link>
		<dc:creator>Seefleur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 15:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2005/11/20/times-of-london-woodward%e2%80%99s-source-was-hadley/#comment-239099</guid>
		<description>Missed #17 - thanks belatedly for the info!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Missed #17 &#8211; thanks belatedly for the info!<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=239099', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seefleur</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/11/20/woodward-hadley/comment-page-1/#comment-239048</link>
		<dc:creator>Seefleur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 14:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2005/11/20/times-of-london-woodward%e2%80%99s-source-was-hadley/#comment-239048</guid>
		<description>Wasn&#039;t Hadley working as a top aide to Condi Rice during all this?  Is it possible that she knows more about this than has been aired?  Any thoughts on this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wasn&#8217;t Hadley working as a top aide to Condi Rice during all this?  Is it possible that she knows more about this than has been aired?  Any thoughts on this?<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=239048', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/11/20/woodward-hadley/comment-page-1/#comment-238261</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 06:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2005/11/20/times-of-london-woodward%e2%80%99s-source-was-hadley/#comment-238261</guid>
		<description>Read the letter from findlaw.com that Amy posted.  

Seems we need to put more pressure on Fitz.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read the letter from findlaw.com that Amy posted.  </p>
<p>Seems we need to put more pressure on Fitz.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=238261', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/11/20/woodward-hadley/comment-page-1/#comment-238259</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 06:40:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2005/11/20/times-of-london-woodward%e2%80%99s-source-was-hadley/#comment-238259</guid>
		<description>#18 Amy,  awesome.  Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#18 Amy,  awesome.  Thanks.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=238259', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marie</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/11/20/woodward-hadley/comment-page-1/#comment-237308</link>
		<dc:creator>Marie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2005 21:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2005/11/20/times-of-london-woodward%e2%80%99s-source-was-hadley/#comment-237308</guid>
		<description>I also think it was Hadley, who was acting for Cheney.  I think Cheney is behind most of the nefarious doings in this WH -- he&#039;s had many years to line up his people, work his long-term plan.
If Hadley is eventually indicted, the WH will distance themselves from him and Libby.  These guys are all out to save their own skin -- if the indicted can&#039;t be made to rat them out, they will live to scheme again.
#21, Ryan, I also have believed that Hadley, through his connections, was the one who arranged the forged documents about Niger.
(I just saw Bush getting his most important exercise today, riding his bike with the Chinese Olympic team. Barf.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also think it was Hadley, who was acting for Cheney.  I think Cheney is behind most of the nefarious doings in this WH &#8212; he&#8217;s had many years to line up his people, work his long-term plan.<br />
If Hadley is eventually indicted, the WH will distance themselves from him and Libby.  These guys are all out to save their own skin &#8212; if the indicted can&#8217;t be made to rat them out, they will live to scheme again.<br />
#21, Ryan, I also have believed that Hadley, through his connections, was the one who arranged the forged documents about Niger.<br />
(I just saw Bush getting his most important exercise today, riding his bike with the Chinese Olympic team. Barf.)<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=237308', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Neat</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/11/20/woodward-hadley/comment-page-1/#comment-237164</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Neat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2005 19:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2005/11/20/times-of-london-woodward%e2%80%99s-source-was-hadley/#comment-237164</guid>
		<description>Hadley was supposedly behind the forged niger document as well - no surprise he&#039;d be involved in this deeply.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hadley was supposedly behind the forged niger document as well &#8211; no surprise he&#8217;d be involved in this deeply.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=237164', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malinda Church</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/11/20/woodward-hadley/comment-page-1/#comment-237163</link>
		<dc:creator>Malinda Church</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2005 19:48:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2005/11/20/times-of-london-woodward%e2%80%99s-source-was-hadley/#comment-237163</guid>
		<description>Regardless of who did the &quot;dastardly deed&quot; as Shakespeare would say-------why was her cover blown?

What was the reason----seems to me there must have been a reason to do this?  Is there something more that isn&#039;t apparent?  Just asking?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regardless of who did the &#8220;dastardly deed&#8221; as Shakespeare would say&#8212;&#8212;-why was her cover blown?</p>
<p>What was the reason&#8212;-seems to me there must have been a reason to do this?  Is there something more that isn&#8217;t apparent?  Just asking?<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=237163', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Rowe</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/11/20/woodward-hadley/comment-page-1/#comment-236751</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Rowe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2005 17:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2005/11/20/times-of-london-woodward%e2%80%99s-source-was-hadley/#comment-236751</guid>
		<description>I think the Times is out on a limb on this one.  They don&#039;t have sources the NYT or WP don&#039;t have and neither of them are reporting it as &quot;Hadley is the guy.&quot;

I think the Times&#039; editors just made a premature decision that it was Hadley based on the evidence everyone already has.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the Times is out on a limb on this one.  They don&#8217;t have sources the NYT or WP don&#8217;t have and neither of them are reporting it as &#8220;Hadley is the guy.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think the Times&#8217; editors just made a premature decision that it was Hadley based on the evidence everyone already has.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=236751', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/11/20/woodward-hadley/comment-page-1/#comment-236709</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2005 17:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2005/11/20/times-of-london-woodward%e2%80%99s-source-was-hadley/#comment-236709</guid>
		<description>Have you seen this excellent letter to Patrick Fitzgerald from John Dean?

An Open Letter To Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald From Former White House Counsel John W. Dean
http://writ.news.findlaw.com/dean/20051118.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you seen this excellent letter to Patrick Fitzgerald from John Dean?</p>
<p>An Open Letter To Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald From Former White House Counsel John W. Dean<br />
<a href="http://writ.news.findlaw.com/dean/20051118.html" rel="nofollow">http://writ.news.findlaw.com/dean/20051118.html</a><a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=236709', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/11/20/woodward-hadley/comment-page-1/#comment-236706</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2005 17:32:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2005/11/20/times-of-london-woodward%e2%80%99s-source-was-hadley/#comment-236706</guid>
		<description>Some people are speculating that it was Kindasleazy Rice:
http://www.workingforchange.com/blog/index.cfm?mode=entry&amp;entry=AC6B02C0-EBE3-9A80-CF094C1B798E1588</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some people are speculating that it was Kindasleazy Rice:<br />
<a href="http://www.workingforchange.com/blog/index.cfm?mode=entry&amp;entry=AC6B02C0-EBE3-9A80-CF094C1B798E1588" rel="nofollow">http://www.workingforchange.com/blog/index.cfm?mode=entry&amp;entry=AC6B02C0-EBE3-9A80-CF094C1B798E1588</a><a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=236706', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: truth4achange</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/11/20/woodward-hadley/comment-page-1/#comment-236653</link>
		<dc:creator>truth4achange</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2005 16:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2005/11/20/times-of-london-woodward%e2%80%99s-source-was-hadley/#comment-236653</guid>
		<description>yeah, but if you want a really hot story, find out if Hadley was also the one that signed off on the use of lions in interrogating detainees!

http://www.hairytruth.blogspot.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah, but if you want a really hot story, find out if Hadley was also the one that signed off on the use of lions in interrogating detainees!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.hairytruth.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.hairytruth.blogspot.com</a><a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=236653', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Muse</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/11/20/woodward-hadley/comment-page-1/#comment-236437</link>
		<dc:creator>The Muse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2005 14:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2005/11/20/times-of-london-woodward%e2%80%99s-source-was-hadley/#comment-236437</guid>
		<description>If memory serves, Hadley offered his resignation after the WH said that the infamous 16 words should not have been in the speech.

They had been struck from a big speech several months earlier and Hadley said that he should have caught them on round two (how anyone could have forgotten the CIA Director&#039;s calls and memos on the topic is another example of not to be believed forgetfulness).

If this is proven, we have NSA who not only can&#039;t remember important facts regarding nuclear proliferation, he&#039;s revealing the identity of covert agents to outsiders. Sounds like a perfect candidate to serve in this incompetent White House.

New on EWM: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eyewitnessmuse.com/musings.php?p=187&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; â€œSociety of Co-opted Journalists Presents Inaugural Judy Miller Award to Bob Woodwardâ€ &lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If memory serves, Hadley offered his resignation after the WH said that the infamous 16 words should not have been in the speech.</p>
<p>They had been struck from a big speech several months earlier and Hadley said that he should have caught them on round two (how anyone could have forgotten the CIA Director&#8217;s calls and memos on the topic is another example of not to be believed forgetfulness).</p>
<p>If this is proven, we have NSA who not only can&#8217;t remember important facts regarding nuclear proliferation, he&#8217;s revealing the identity of covert agents to outsiders. Sounds like a perfect candidate to serve in this incompetent White House.</p>
<p>New on EWM: <a href="http://www.eyewitnessmuse.com/musings.php?p=187" rel="nofollow"> â€œSociety of Co-opted Journalists Presents Inaugural Judy Miller Award to Bob Woodwardâ€ </a><a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=236437', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThomNYC</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/11/20/woodward-hadley/comment-page-1/#comment-236425</link>
		<dc:creator>ThomNYC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2005 14:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2005/11/20/times-of-london-woodward%e2%80%99s-source-was-hadley/#comment-236425</guid>
		<description>What would American get out of Hadley and Libby being convicted of anything?  The WH can easily distance itself from them.  

Remember, Nixon was careless and had to resign only because he was exposed by his own extreme arrogance.  Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice, Rove... they are arrogant.  But, they aren&#039;t careless when it comes to insulating themselves and covering tracks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What would American get out of Hadley and Libby being convicted of anything?  The WH can easily distance itself from them.  </p>
<p>Remember, Nixon was careless and had to resign only because he was exposed by his own extreme arrogance.  Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice, Rove&#8230; they are arrogant.  But, they aren&#8217;t careless when it comes to insulating themselves and covering tracks.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=236425', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: not_gonna_happen</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/11/20/woodward-hadley/comment-page-1/#comment-236409</link>
		<dc:creator>not_gonna_happen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2005 14:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2005/11/20/times-of-london-woodward%e2%80%99s-source-was-hadley/#comment-236409</guid>
		<description>What a smooth way to point at the WH circling the wagons. It seems like a way to remove the potential for his words biting him back later on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a smooth way to point at the WH circling the wagons. It seems like a way to remove the potential for his words biting him back later on.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=236409', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Average TV Viewer</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/11/20/woodward-hadley/comment-page-1/#comment-236377</link>
		<dc:creator>Average TV Viewer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2005 13:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2005/11/20/times-of-london-woodward%e2%80%99s-source-was-hadley/#comment-236377</guid>
		<description>You think Fitz has had to go home each and every day and wash the disgusting stench of &quot;Access Journalism&quot; off his raw skin?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You think Fitz has had to go home each and every day and wash the disgusting stench of &#8220;Access Journalism&#8221; off his raw skin?<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=236377', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Average TV Viewer</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/11/20/woodward-hadley/comment-page-1/#comment-236372</link>
		<dc:creator>Average TV Viewer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2005 13:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2005/11/20/times-of-london-woodward%e2%80%99s-source-was-hadley/#comment-236372</guid>
		<description>#2

How long before the first &quot;no comment&quot; from the WH...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#2</p>
<p>How long before the first &#8220;no comment&#8221; from the WH&#8230;<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=236372', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JAB</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/11/20/woodward-hadley/comment-page-1/#comment-236361</link>
		<dc:creator>JAB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2005 13:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2005/11/20/times-of-london-woodward%e2%80%99s-source-was-hadley/#comment-236361</guid>
		<description>re: &quot;Seems odd that the White House would have Hadley out front so much if he was in this much potential jeopardy.&quot;

Not if the conspiracy set up Hadley as the fall guy in case someone discovered the conspiracy. And it is not much jeopardy  when you can expect a pardon if you are caught. With Woodward in the time line, and his story, this pretty much establishes how the conspiracy worked. Hadley leaks by  &quot;casually mentioning Wilson&#039;s wife works for the CIA&quot; to Woodward. The &quot;casual mention&quot; is part of the conspiracy. The conspiracy required Hadley to leak Plame &quot;casually&quot; and refer to Plame as &quot;Wilson&#039;s wife&quot; off-handed, so as not to seem like a concerted White House effort and keep  suspicion down. All reports I have seen quote reporters saying admin sources mentioned Wilsons wife in an offhand or casual comment. Woodward said it was offhand remark, gossip. Novak said &quot;I did not dig it up it was given to me&quot;, etc. The plan called for 2 or 3 leakers, Libby probably the first as the fall guy, to leak to designated reporters and confirm to all other reporters who called to confirm. The planners knew that the reporters would then call another source to confirm. Rove&#039;s  reporters would call Libby to confirm and Libby&#039;s reporters  would call Rove to confirm, and each would only confirm to any other reproter not their &quot;leakees&quot;. The confirmation would be something like: &quot;Yeah I heard that too from reporters&quot; Lower admin members were probably ordered either implicitly or explicitly to &quot;confirm&quot; the story but not leak. For example Libby leaks to Woodward, Miller, and a 3rd reporter, &quot;C&quot; and confirms to all other repoters who called by saying something like &quot;Yeah I heard the rumor too from reporters.&quot; Rove leaks to reporters &quot;D&quot; &quot;E&quot; and &quot;F&quot; and likewise confirms to all others. Maybe a 3rd admin source leaks to reporters &quot;G&quot; &quot;H&quot; and &quot;I&quot;.  The conspiracy hoped this would muddy the waters enough so the leak would seem like the &quot;idle gossip among reporters&quot; Woodward and Novak said it was. JAB</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>re: &#8220;Seems odd that the White House would have Hadley out front so much if he was in this much potential jeopardy.&#8221;</p>
<p>Not if the conspiracy set up Hadley as the fall guy in case someone discovered the conspiracy. And it is not much jeopardy  when you can expect a pardon if you are caught. With Woodward in the time line, and his story, this pretty much establishes how the conspiracy worked. Hadley leaks by  &#8220;casually mentioning Wilson&#8217;s wife works for the CIA&#8221; to Woodward. The &#8220;casual mention&#8221; is part of the conspiracy. The conspiracy required Hadley to leak Plame &#8220;casually&#8221; and refer to Plame as &#8220;Wilson&#8217;s wife&#8221; off-handed, so as not to seem like a concerted White House effort and keep  suspicion down. All reports I have seen quote reporters saying admin sources mentioned Wilsons wife in an offhand or casual comment. Woodward said it was offhand remark, gossip. Novak said &#8220;I did not dig it up it was given to me&#8221;, etc. The plan called for 2 or 3 leakers, Libby probably the first as the fall guy, to leak to designated reporters and confirm to all other reporters who called to confirm. The planners knew that the reporters would then call another source to confirm. Rove&#8217;s  reporters would call Libby to confirm and Libby&#8217;s reporters  would call Rove to confirm, and each would only confirm to any other reproter not their &#8220;leakees&#8221;. The confirmation would be something like: &#8220;Yeah I heard that too from reporters&#8221; Lower admin members were probably ordered either implicitly or explicitly to &#8220;confirm&#8221; the story but not leak. For example Libby leaks to Woodward, Miller, and a 3rd reporter, &#8220;C&#8221; and confirms to all other repoters who called by saying something like &#8220;Yeah I heard the rumor too from reporters.&#8221; Rove leaks to reporters &#8220;D&#8221; &#8220;E&#8221; and &#8220;F&#8221; and likewise confirms to all others. Maybe a 3rd admin source leaks to reporters &#8220;G&#8221; &#8220;H&#8221; and &#8220;I&#8221;.  The conspiracy hoped this would muddy the waters enough so the leak would seem like the &#8220;idle gossip among reporters&#8221; Woodward and Novak said it was. JAB<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=236361', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suzanne</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/11/20/woodward-hadley/comment-page-1/#comment-235835</link>
		<dc:creator>Suzanne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2005 08:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2005/11/20/times-of-london-woodward%e2%80%99s-source-was-hadley/#comment-235835</guid>
		<description>I too believe Darth Chency is behind it all, but more expeditious to hang an underling like Hadley out to dry?  Remember how non-responsive and defensive Condi was in her confirmation hearings?  And how testy she was particularly with Barbara Boxer?  She&#039;s missed the mark from the very beginning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too believe Darth Chency is behind it all, but more expeditious to hang an underling like Hadley out to dry?  Remember how non-responsive and defensive Condi was in her confirmation hearings?  And how testy she was particularly with Barbara Boxer?  She&#8217;s missed the mark from the very beginning.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=235835', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Evil</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/11/20/woodward-hadley/comment-page-1/#comment-235816</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Evil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2005 08:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2005/11/20/times-of-london-woodward%e2%80%99s-source-was-hadley/#comment-235816</guid>
		<description>How anyone today could call themselves a republican, in good conscience, with pride, would be amazing. Amazingly stupid!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How anyone today could call themselves a republican, in good conscience, with pride, would be amazing. Amazingly stupid!<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=235816', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
