texas hold um

hair transplant and hair loss help

jennifer lopez

50Cent

Wedding Bands

Horoscope

Brad Pitt

Verizon Ringtones

Cooking Recipes

When a mother of a Vietnam MIA stood up in a presidential gathering and asked what the so called administraion of GHW shrub (#41) he shouted at her:

“…shut up, just shut up! You people make me sick! Get her out of here!…”

such a kind a gentle family (more shrub lies: a kinder and gentler America). Marie Antoinette Bush about the N.O. homeless in the Astrodome: “…well it is a little scary, they say they want to stay here. This is working out quite well for them, as they are underpriviledged anyway.”

Such class! Do you expect any more from their supporters?

Comment by kjlovell

That first quote of the big bad bush was in 1984 I believe. I saw the film of it recently, and was horrified to see that this a$$hole would treat people like that. In the private sector, you would be fired for an outburst like that!

But I expect nothing less from the likes of the shrubs and their supporters.

Keep up the good work KJ!

Educating the public is good for them.

Men won’t touch me.

Women run in terror when they see me.

I scare small animals and children when they see me.

I am socially retarded. I think I am superior, but in reality I do know that I am a
Horrid Piece of $hit.

Forgive me, God is not finished with me yet.

The leader of Iraq’s most powerful political party has called on the United States to let Iraqi fighters take a more aggressive role against insurgents, saying his country will only be able to defeat the insurgency when the United States lets Iraqis get tough.

“The more freedom given to Iraqis, the more chance for further progress there would be, particularly in fighting terror,” said Abdul Aziz Hakim, head of the Supreme Council for the Islamic Revolution in Iraq, the Shiite Muslim religious party that leads the transitional government and whose armed wing is the most feared of Iraq’s many factional forces.

Instead, Hakim asserted in a rare interview late last week, the United States is tying Iraq’s hands in the fight against insurgents. One of Iraq’s “biggest problems is the mistaken or wrong policies practiced by the Americans,” he said.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/11/26/AR2005112601211.html

Now, let’s be clear. This is one of the real leaders of Iraq and he’s telling us to get out of the way and let them do what needs to be done to clean out the Sunni Triangle and the Sunni insurgents coming in from Syria and Iran. I think he’s tired of his mosques, grade schools and weddings being bombed and his people killed. The good thing is when he gets his chance (and he will) there won’t be any peace/love/dove Leftwing Loser Democrats around crying about abuse and atrocities committed against the terrorists and tying the hands of the military. Why? Because he’ll kill all the whiners he can and deport the rest. There will be no more Democrats visiting Iraq. So who do you think really wants to cut troops and hand over more responsibility to the Iraqis? Bush or the Donks?

Comment by kjlovell

Such a liar, and a bad liar. I certainly don’t expect anything different from you.

When a mother of a Vietnam MIA stood up in a presidential gathering and asked what the so called administraion of GHW shrub (#41) he shouted at her:

“…shut up, just shut up! You people make me sick! Get her out of here!…”

such a kind a gentle family (more shrub lies: a kinder and gentler America). Marie Antoinette Bush about the N.O. homeless in the Astrodome: “…well it is a little scary, they say they want to stay here. This is working out quite well for them, as they are underpriviledged anyway.”

Such class! Do you expect any more from their supporters?

We are talking now about a guy who as a kid put firecrackers in frogs and threw them into the air to watch them explode. He would routinely place firecrackers in cats anuses and set them off. Once if a fit of rage, took a stray dog and in a mock satanic ritual boiled it to death, although his family had the good sense to brush this little endeavor under the family carpet with their other scandals. He cracked himself up in an interview with Talk magazine by mocking a woman on death row whose cries for mercy he scorned, screwing up his face and saying, “Please don’t kill me!” in an impersonation of the deceased.
He presided over more executions as governor of Texas than any governor since capital punishment was legalized. His own people said he never spent more than 15 minutes deliberating over whether to sign the order to kill. This included at least one case in which the public defender slept during the trial, and many other cases in which the court-appointed lawyers obviously just took the money and ran, leaving their clients to the mercy of a vicious and corrupt system.
This is a man who enjoys killing. He is totally in his element when it comes to killing.

It only knows the REPUGnican talking points, and cannot take part in a debate. Armed with dim wits, it is actually quite simple and cannot discuss the issues.

You can see the KKK postings it posts saying that all fags, jews and ragheads must be taken to the concentration camps.

It is a small minded simple biggot.

Pay no attention to it.

March 20, 2003
George W. Is High on Killing
Every once in a while we experience one of those little moments when a small tear breaks through the social fabric and allows us a glimpse of its underlying workings.
A Knight Ridder reporter was treated to such a rare glimpse and apparently couldn’t resist including it in his story, though it was tangential to the narrative. And no editor cut it out, so we are left with a gem, a glimpse into the strange personality of George W.
The article was a description of Bush’s speech announcing that he had ordered strikes to begin on Iraq.
Here’s the quote: “Minutes before the speech, an internal television monitor showed the president pumping his fist. ‘Feels good,’ he said.”
Dubya is now at the brink of what he has pushed for relentlessly for years, perhaps as far back as 1992 when Bill Clinton was elected and ruined Daddy Bush’s chance to continue his agenda and get in a few more armed engagements, which surely would have included a return to Iraq to take revenge for his embarassment over people talking about “the wimp factor” and saying he was a little feminine….
We are talking now about a guy who as a kid put firecrackers in frogs and threw them into the air to watch them explode. He would routinely place firecrackers in cats anuses and set them off. Once if a fit of rage, took a stray dog and in a mock satanic ritual boiled it to death, although his family had the good sense to brush this little endeavor under the family carpet with their other scandals. He cracked himself up in an interview with Talk magazine by mocking a woman on death row whose cries for mercy he scorned, screwing up his face and saying, “Please don’t kill me!” in an impersonation of the deceased.
He presided over more executions as governor of Texas than any governor since capital punishment was legalized. His own people said he never spent more than 15 minutes deliberating over whether to sign the order to kill. This included at least one case in which the public defender slept during the trial, and many other cases in which the court-appointed lawyers obviously just took the money and ran, leaving their clients to the mercy of a vicious and corrupt system.
This is a man who enjoys killing. He is totally in his element when it comes to killing.
More on Georgie’s frog-exploding activities:
Someone asked me for the source on young George W.’s frog-exploding experiments, so I did some searches and came up with some … interesting stuff. Interesting? How about terrifying? This is a real life horror story. It ain’t no Stephen King movie. The real life Dubya inspires images of the devil’s child in the movie “The Omen”. Or worse….
In biographical sketch of Bush in the New York Times, Nicholas Kristoff quotes Bush’s boyhood friend Terry Throckmorton as saying, “We were terrible to animals.” When the frogs came out after a rain, the kids would get BB guns and shoot them, Throckmorton said, or worse. “Or we’d put firecrackers in the frogs and throw them and blow them up.”
To really stoke your fears of this guy’s capacity for psychopathology, check out “Shrub Bush’s Pathological Focus On Saddam Hussein” by Alvin Wyman Walker, PhD, PD, PC.. It refers to the frog assassinations, among other things.
This was the son of the head of the CIA we are talking about. Try to grok that for a second.
The article I had on file for the frog anecdote was in an article by Myriam Miedzian, called “Growing up is hard to do,” originally published in the Baltimore Sun, September 12, 2000.
Here’s a key section:
So when he was a kid, George W. enjoyed putting firecrackers into frogs, throwing them in the air, and then watching them blow up. Should this be cause for alarm? How relevant is a man’s childhood behavior to what he is like as an adult? And in this case, to what he would be like as president of the United States?
Cruelty to animals is a common precursor to later criminal violence. But in rural West Texas, where George W. grew up, it was not uncommon for some boys to indulge in such cruelty….
His blowing up frogs or shooting them with BB guns with friends does not have the same significance it would have if, for example, a city boy blew up the family cat. In fact, George’s childhood friend, Terry Throckmorton, openly and laughingly admits, ‘We were terrible to animals.’
But there were surely many boys in George’s hometown of Midland, Texas, who would have been repelled at the thought of blowing up frogs. So how much importance should we attribute to this early behavior?
Is boy George’s lack of empathy and cruelty not just childhood insensitivity, but rather a personality trait still present in the man? If so, we have much to be concerned about.
I received this e-mail today:
Hi,
I was drawn to your site by an article about George ‘Feelgood’ Bush – it’s a dangerous place for a person who should be working!
It seems like a startling (not to say scaring) coincidence that you should compare him to Bundy et al. As soon as I saw Bush on tv the first time I felt that he was the kind of person that one shouldn’t turn the back on. There’s simply something about his … ‘aura’ if you will; he seems to emanate something horribly wrong, like there’s no actual person inside. Even today I simply switch away from his appearances on tv.
So, I very quickly started believing that he is a psychopath. I’ve read a good deal about the subject, and it fits too well, I think. Psychopaths tend to have this air of ‘innocense’ about them – like they can’t for their lives imagine why people are so cross about what they do – whether it is lying, stealing or killing. Bush reminds me about something I read many years ago, in a book by C.S.Lewis (’Perelandra’ I think it was called). It’s a kind of ’science fiction’, and the main character (named ‘Ransom’ I think) is on Venus engaged in a mental battle with the evil guy, and in one scene he finds the bad guy engrossed in killing frogs in a painful way. What really took my breath away about this situation is the way he meets Ransom with a totally innocent smile – this is a guy that quite clearly and simply enjoys what he is doing and finds nothing wrong about it.
I think when we begin to see pictures of little children blown apart or whatever, Bush will simply not feel anything, and he will be surprised that others do. That I believe is also the reason why he always talks as if he doesn’t know what he is saying – because he doesn’t. It doesn’t come from the heart, there is no heart, no soul. This is not the emperor with no clothes, it’s the clothes with no emperor.
It is probably hard for most to imagine how it is to be Bush – or any other psychopath. Normal people feel something whenever they say or think something; it’s not possible not to. Even when you say a neutral word like ‘car’ it evokes feelings, and of course emotional words evoke more. Apparently psychopaths aren’t that way – they are ’semantically blind’.
For more about Bush’s frog killing see Revenge of the Bush Dynasty, by Elizabeth Mitchell published by Hyperion Press, 2001 ISBN: 0786866306.

See we don’t hate our country, we just hate you.

You know who threatens people because they don’t like their words?

Nazi’s dipshit, that’s who.

Get a clue, no one in here is scared of you or your little girl threats, you sick little coward. No one in here, or probably anywhere near that trailerpark you house your double-wide in, is afraid of your empty threats, or your big fat mouth.

Threats of violence for someones words just prove to which god you pray.

Comment by Warped-R-us

Your rights include a hefty helping of responsibility, especially in a time of war. For example Jane Fonda and John Kerry should just now be getting out of prison. You DO know what responsibility means, don’t you punk?

“However, the state only holds power in trust for the collective good, and its legitimacy is ultimately founded on the implied consent of its citizens. Whereas the state has an obligation to protect and preserve the security and safety of its citizens, the citizens have an obligation to abide by the ethical and legal principles upon which the state is founded.

When individuals through deeds or words threaten the security of the state and the safety of its citizens the government has a legal and ethical obligation to do whatever is needed to protect its citizens. A government that fails to do so would rightly be deemed negligible and held culpable for such negligence.”

http://www.smh.com.au/news/opinion/freedom-if-others-are-restrained/2005/11/20/1132421541927.html