Coulter on Murtha: He Longs “To See U.S. Troops Shot, Humiliated”
By on Nov 25th, 2005 at 12:49 pm
Coulter on Murtha: He Longs “To See U.S. Troops Shot, Humiliated”
Columinst Ann Coulter had this to say decorated Vietnam War veteran Rep. Jack Murtha and others who think it’s time that U.S. troops come home from Iraq:
It is simply a fact that Democrats like Murtha are encouraging the Iraqi insurgents when they say the war is going badly and it’s time to bring the troops home…[T]hey long to see U.S. troops shot, humiliated, and driven from the field of battle. They fill the airwaves with treason…These people are not only traitors, they are gutless traitors.
You can contact the company that syndicates Coulter’s column, UPS, at lsalem@amuniversal.com.
View Most Popular
Advertisement
What We're About
What We're Fighting For
What We're Fighting Against
Featured
Subscribe to the Progress Report
Topic CloudView topics sorted by popularity
Afghanistan
Bachmann
Beck
Boehner
Bush
Cheney
Civil Rights
Congress
Corporate Ethics
Dobbs
Economy
Education
Election
Energy
Environment
Ethics
Fox News
Gingrich
Global Warming
Health Care
Immigration
International Relations
Iraq
Justice
LGBT
Lieberman
Limbaugh
McCain
Media
Military
O'Reilly
Obama
Palin
Pelosi
Public Plan
Race
Radical Right
Religion
Sports
Steele
Steve King
Stimulus
Tea Parties
Technology
Women's Rights
Visit Our Affiliated Sites
Reports
In-depth studies on select topics
Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.
ArchivesBlog Roll
Looks like Coulter will have to join Jean Schmidt and Bob Woodward on the list of those recently smited by the “Avenging Angel.”
November 25th, 2005 at 12:52 pmDemocrats ought to play this over and over and over as an example of republican values.
November 25th, 2005 at 12:53 pmuh…wow. just read the first paragraph, and you’ll see more lies than Scooter Mac press briefing. Iraq and Al Q, long-range missles, uranium from Ni….wait! Even the PRES has discounted the uranium theory and she’s still saying it?
She’s so full of crap that I am stunned respectable news outlets will still print it.
November 25th, 2005 at 12:55 pmWow, just wow. These NeoCons DO live in an alternate reality. Wow.
November 25th, 2005 at 1:01 pmShe and Schmidt should don a uniform .They may not be so good with a gun , but with such well articulated mouth they could be of some use to relieve the tension of our troops who are under such great pressure to stay the course .
November 25th, 2005 at 1:02 pmMouths like that, they could win wars single handly.
November 25th, 2005 at 1:04 pmShe knock over the enemy with her adams apple.
November 25th, 2005 at 1:06 pmI wonder if people like her really believe they are defeating evil?
November 25th, 2005 at 1:07 pmAnn, shut the hell up, quit your Nazi propaganda and get into a more legitimate line of work as a Playboy Bunny. Besides, you’ll learn to be a smart as them.
November 25th, 2005 at 1:08 pmgood one spudge,
November 25th, 2005 at 1:08 pmI guess She thinks She is a Man.
“You can contact the company that syndicates Coulter’s column, UPS, at lsalem@amuniversal.com.” I did. Here it is.
Ann Coulter’s remarks about Murtha and the Democrats should tell you it’s time for her to go. How ridiculous is it to accuse any American of hating our troops? Really. Are you being responsible by allowing this representative of psychosis, fanaticism and paranoia to continue with your support? Wouldn’t you rather support rational individuals? Or not..? This time in our history will be looked back on as a time of delusional thinking, where basic rules of politeness, reasonable disagreement, and well thought out and expressed debate were not possible. Ms. Coulter is not part of the solution, the contrary. And what is the solution? I don’t pretend to know the total solution but the first step is: For us all to find our way back to one America by not letting irrational voices continue to inflame each side to the point where real damage to America is possible. Ms. Coulter is not rational or respectable voice….
November 25th, 2005 at 1:09 pm“You can contact the company that syndicates Coulter’s column, UPS, at lsalem@amuniversal.com.” I did. Here it is.
Ann Coulter’s remarks about Murtha and the Democrats should tell you it’s time for her to go. How ridiculous is it to accuse any American of hating our troops? Really. Are you being responsible by allowing this representative of psychosis, fanaticism and paranoia to continue with your support? Wouldn’t you rather support rational individuals? Or not..? This time in our history will be looked back on as a time of delusional thinking, where basic rules of politeness, reasonable disagreement, and well thought out and expressed debate were not possible. Ms. Coulter is not part of the solution, the contrary. And what is the solution? I don’t pretend to know the total solution but the first step is: For us all to find our way back to one America by not letting irrational voices continue to inflame each side to the point where real damage to America is possible. Ms. Coulter is not rational or respectable voice….
November 25th, 2005 at 1:09 pm9) Drives me crazy trying to figure out if they believe what they say or believe in the pay.
November 25th, 2005 at 1:11 pmmy email:
you should be ashamed of yourself for actually printing ann coulter’s slanderous commentary on murtha. seriously, she is the lowest of the low, and mark my words…you will be publicly humiliated by her before the bush administration is done. apologists like her are the bane of our country, and though i support free speech and her right to be wrong, i cannot in good conscience let her absurd opinions be voiced without speaking up myself. my voice may not get published in millions of copies of newspapers and online journals, but it is representative of many millions of patriotic americans who have frankly had enough of this neocon propaganda.
i know that sending this email will do nothing….that you have your own agenda, and its bottom line is selling newspapers and sustaining advertising revenue. fine. but don’t be surprised when this strategy comes back to bite you in the ass. there is an immutable law of karma that you can choose to ignore, but you cannot avoid. there *should* be a morality and a conscience in the media that is horribly lacking today, and your decision to support coulter is emblematic of this lack on self-scrutiny and conscience.
November 25th, 2005 at 1:11 pmWhat’s Ann Coulter going to do when her right wing world shrinks to an audience of 25? The moment is quickly coming and none to soon. The day I walk into a Barnes and Noble and not see her books on a free standing ad campaign book shelf taking up room, will be the one of the happiest days of my life. She is a freak.
November 25th, 2005 at 1:28 pm“Ann, shut the hell up, quit your Nazi propaganda and get into a more legitimate line of work as a Playboy Bunny.”
JIMBO,
Ewwwwwww.
November 25th, 2005 at 1:28 pmNew Age Nazis.
Ann Coulter is clearly “unhinged”.
It is time to put pressure on CNN, MSNBC, NBS and FOX to send this NAZI shill packing into the hinterlands.
I wonder how many wounded soldiers Ann Colter has visited at Walter Reed.
Thank God for the second amendment that she so hates.
-GSD
November 25th, 2005 at 1:33 pmSomeone said it earlier, but it bears repeating – Wow. She is absolutely crazy. If she didn’t have an audience we could write her off as a total nutcase. What’s weird is that I heard she was educated. What, by the monkeys at the beginning of 2001: A Space Odyssey?
November 25th, 2005 at 1:44 pm#17 « Thank God for the second amendment that she so hates. »
Huh? The Second Amendment is the only part of the Bill of Rights that conservatives revere.
As for the rest of the constitution, they would just as soon wipe their asses with it as actually READ and UNDERSTAND it.
November 25th, 2005 at 1:46 pmMy e-mail was simple and to the point:
November 25th, 2005 at 1:53 pmThis woman is a detriment to our country. Get rid of her.
Why try to get her off the air. The response following the Murtha thing should tell you that we want her to open her Bass like mouth even more. The more she screams treason, the worse the right looks and the more distance moderate voters will want to put between themselves and people like this. She’s only appealing to that extreme right audience that will vote republican no matter what anyway.
November 25th, 2005 at 1:56 pmSay,err MAnn Coldturd,
Please tell the Public about Bush friends Private Mercenary Armies such as Blackwater USA.
MAnn you can go WORK for Blackwater USA if you think 70% of the American public is Traitors.
Now THAT Would be News. -Aj
November 25th, 2005 at 1:56 pmPUT THE PRESSURE ON: It’s the only way. We’re all tired of her.
This is an excellent website for making contacting
newspapers, government officials, easier.
http://www.democrats.org/page/ sp…etterstoeditors
You can also contact ( as is printed at the top of this page ) the company that syndicates Coulter’s column, UPS, at lsalem@amuniversal.com.
November 25th, 2005 at 1:58 pmRegarding the post above, no. 26. This should work:
http://www.democrats.org/page/speakout/letterstoeditors
November 25th, 2005 at 2:00 pm80% of Iraqi’s want us OUT of there anyway. That means that 80% of Iraq is “insurgents” as the word is used to define ANYONE who opposes imperialistic domination of the US.
And Ann Coulter or Andy Coultrane as she used to be before her horribly botched sex change can kiss my gonads. At least I’ve still got mine unlike the GOP outpiece eunuch.
November 25th, 2005 at 2:03 pmCount me among those who e-mailed Isalem regarding the hate-filled speech by Ann Coulter.
November 25th, 2005 at 2:07 pm#19.
Ooops.I meant the FIRST AMENDMENT.
Bush has checked off the abuses of the rest of the Bill of Rights like a grocery list.
Sorry.
-GSD
November 25th, 2005 at 2:22 pmI don’t hate anyone, but I have to say that I don’t care if she lives to be 113 or whether she dies tragically from some terrible disease.
I just couldn’t care less about this woman’s existence. Period.
November 25th, 2005 at 2:23 pmYitch! Just reading Coulter made me feel like a bad burrito went zinging through the hard way. What is wrong with him? Oh…. I emailed.
November 25th, 2005 at 2:30 pmMs. Coulter deserves her own commission on a Lyin’ Swift Boat, I think. No one hates America better than Ann.
November 25th, 2005 at 2:33 pmhe/she’s proof some women SHOULD be in combat.
November 25th, 2005 at 2:40 pmThis is Annie before her pre-Clinton-era makeover.
November 25th, 2005 at 2:41 pmLet’s try this again, shall mwe?
This is Annir before her pre-Clinton-era makeover.
November 25th, 2005 at 2:42 pmEventually, Ann Coulter will return to the margins where extremists belong. She is enjoying the sunlight while she has it.
The days of people taking her seriously are probably almost over, and that will be that. She will still publish books, make appearances on FN, but her level of rhetoric can’t sustain itself forever.
November 25th, 2005 at 2:50 pmWhat a dishonest use of ellipses, Judd. Not that dishonesty from the paid propagandists of ThinkFailure is any surprise.
Judd said, “I love…Saddam Hussein…and Osama bin Ladin …too.”
November 25th, 2005 at 2:53 pmShe’s going the way of Billbo O’Reilly.
November 25th, 2005 at 2:55 pmTheir mothers are the only ones listening.
Is Ann Coulter mentally unstable? What is the back story of a person like her? She has no honor or integrity yet questions the honor of others.
Perhaps she, like most of the neo cons, needs to remove the log from her own eye etc…
November 25th, 2005 at 2:59 pmBill O’Reilly has one of the top rated shows on cable news, you delusional freak.
November 25th, 2005 at 3:00 pmWhat exactly is a neo-con, Keone? Define the term.
November 25th, 2005 at 3:01 pmAnne the MAnne
November 25th, 2005 at 3:04 pmAKA; Arthur Coltrane =)
i just don’t understand why a true patriot like ms. coulter has yet to pull on her mahnolo slingbacks and ship out for iraq…
November 25th, 2005 at 3:07 pmHow many wars has Ann fought in?
November 25th, 2005 at 3:09 pmShe must be making a mint to live with the guilt of slandering true patriots such as Murtha.
My God is a forgiving God but he is also a vengeful God. I wouldn’t walk outside in a thunderstorm if I were you, Ann.
Her days of casting spells to sap the strength of the people are coming to end. Delilah, time to cut your hair — you’re past your prime!
November 25th, 2005 at 3:11 pmWow. I guess her book sales are down. Any publicity is better than no publicity.
November 25th, 2005 at 3:13 pmC’mon, everbody. You’re being had. Coulter is a tasteless and amoral entertainer. What she does garners a lot of attention. It $ells her columns and her books. It’s about money and celebrity, folks. It always is.
November 25th, 2005 at 3:14 pmSomeone put a ball gang in that bimbo’s mouth!
November 25th, 2005 at 3:14 pmWhackoWallace, AKA MonkeyButtUgly,
NeoCons are American NAZIs that are disciples of LeoStrauss the bonafide Nazi who fled germany and set up shop at the U. Of Chicago. Not only does this group include Rumsfeld and Cheney, but several ‘prominent’ reporters and writers who pretend to be unbiased.
They’re fascists, just like the policies of bush. The fact that you support Nazi Fascists isn’t suprising, you’ve demostrated an uncanny ability to be completely ignorant and retarded in every opinion you post – like most of the nazi followers in germany. They preyed on stupid nationalistic pig farmers in germany, you’re the equivalent of the Naive idiots that joined the Nazis in germany.
November 25th, 2005 at 3:14 pmIf Ryan wasn’t locked in his mother’s basement, he’d be a danger to himself and others.
November 25th, 2005 at 3:17 pmAnn reminds me of a girl I knew in high school who dessperately wanted to be part of the popular group but who could never quite manage it. I believe Ann is the type of person who makes fun of the handicapped guy and then looks around her to see who is laughing with her. She gives me the creeps.
November 25th, 2005 at 3:18 pmwallace, dumb as they are, your comments are still posted here. Try posting something other than echo chamber comments over on the freepers site. you’d see the ” your posting privileges have been revoked”. By all means, keep posting here, I need a good chuckle.
November 25th, 2005 at 3:20 pmWWallace, you are so full of crap.
Here are the paragraphs that Judd excerpted…
– Begin Quote –
It is simply a fact that Democrats like Murtha are encouraging the Iraqi insurgents when they say the war is going badly and it’s time to bring the troops home. Whether or not there is any merit to the idea, calling for a troop withdrawal – or “redeployment,” as liberals pointlessly distinguish – will delay our inevitable victory and cost more American lives.
The Democrats are giving aid and comfort to the enemy for no purpose other than giving aid and comfort to the enemy. There is no plausible explanation for the Democrats’ behavior other than that they long to see U.S. troops shot, humiliated, and driven from the field of battle.
They fill the airwaves with treason, but when called to vote on withdrawing troops, disavow their own public statements. These people are not only traitors, they are gutless traitors.
– end Quote –
So, in the first paragraph Judd removed a section that said that withdrawing the troops would slow down our “inevitable victory” and cost more Amrerican lives. The section is entirely in context, and says what Judd says it does. The fact that Anne Coulter insists that victory is inevitable gives some insight, but is irrelevant to the fact that she calls anyone who opposes her views a traitor. She doesn’t seem to grasp that if the American troops stay in Iraq until the “inevitable victory” some of them will die… Probably more than if the troops come home within the foreseeable future.
The other ellipsis is for the removal of “but when called to vote on withdrawing troops, disavow their own public statements.” Which is a misrepresentation. Murtha made a suggestion for an orderly redeployment of troops to neighbouring countries over a period of months. They are not being withdrawn from the area, just moved to friendly countries where they can return to Iraq if needed. The Republicans introduced a “satirical” motion suggesting that troops should be brought home the following day. That second motion is what was voted on, not the Murtha motion so this is a misrepresentation, but is also irrelevant to Judds point. Her quotes were not taken out of context, even with the use of ellipsis.
Z.
November 25th, 2005 at 3:22 pmIt is not treason to question authority. It is our right–in fact our duty–as American citizens to speak out against a corrupt and unjust regime. The Bush Administration has repeated stretched the truth to achieve its neo-com dreams of American Empire. Enough is enough… we will tolerate no more of this.
November 25th, 2005 at 3:24 pmAnn Coulter is an instrument of the devil. She is an able-bodied woman so it’s time for her shut up, lock and load and go to Iraq and join the fight for a free and democratic Iraq.
November 25th, 2005 at 3:26 pmPerhaps those darn Dems finally took lessons from the traitor who refused unlike Murtha to serve his country, armed Saddam & Osama, the did business with th enemy – Iran for the almighty buck.
November 25th, 2005 at 3:26 pmYup Dick Cheney is a great teacher for future traitors
EMAIL THIS NEWSPAPER NOW!
My local paper continues to spread propaganda.
A local colonel claims that she met Saddam in a Baghdad courtroom. She claims that the Iraqi people are happy we invaded their country.
SADDAM’S WHEREABOUTS HAVE NOT BEEN RELEASED TO THE PUBLIC, EITHER SHE’S LYING OR SHE RELEASED CLASSIFIED INFORMATION.
PLEASE WRITE TO THE EDITOR AT: thesun@scn1.com
READ THE ARTICLE HERE: http://www.suburbanchicagonews.com/sunpub/downersgrove/top/ds24jill.htm
THIS IS IMPORTANT, THIS IS A NEOCON NEWSPAPER!
November 25th, 2005 at 3:27 pmCoulter is a Pundit clown. Her only motivation is to promote her own brand. She makes a living of pulling her pants down in public and running around picking up the pennies that are thrown at her for her hijinks.
Best that we treat her sophomorism with the respect it deserves, which would be to ignore it utterly.
November 25th, 2005 at 3:28 pmPeople like Ann Coulter are hurting the troups in Iraq as well as America’s image the world over.
How can a country that doesn’t tolerate political dissent and the free expression of political ideals pretend to be a beacon of democracy.
November 25th, 2005 at 3:30 pmTo those that would publish such hatred: It’s exactly this kind of misrepresentation of the facts that makes it impossible to have a constructive debate on the most important issues facing this country. No good can come from such words. None what so ever.
Have you no shame?
November 25th, 2005 at 3:30 pm“There is no plausible explanation for the Bushoviks behavior other than that they long to see U.S. troops shot, humiliated, and driven from the field of battle.”
For profit.
November 25th, 2005 at 3:30 pmTell MAnn Coltrane What you think =)
November 25th, 2005 at 3:33 pmhttp://www.townhall.com/opinion/contact/anncoulter/176727.html
Coulter is so over that top that
November 25th, 2005 at 3:38 pmshe defies parody.
Send that b***h over to fight in Iraq if she’s so gung ho over this war.
November 25th, 2005 at 3:42 pmWhat a war mongering hypocrite.
November 25th, 2005 at 3:44 pmIf you have the time and can find it, send this quote to R. Kelly’s agent and publicist:
Rape rooms and torture chambers are back in R. Kelly’s Miami Beach mansion where they belong.
I’m sure they’d love to know that their client is being slandered by Ann. Like him or not, I’ve never heard him accused of rape and torture. Sex with underage girls and possession of child porno, but not that. Think they’d like Annie slandering their money maker?
November 25th, 2005 at 3:47 pmBtw, if I can find the contact info I’ll post it here.
November 25th, 2005 at 3:47 pmTJM, try posting something other than echo-chamber comments liek all your other pro-Saddam buddies here.
Zwack, your comments are pure BS. Judd hacked up Coulter’s article in order to lie about it. Judd lies for a living. He’s paid to lie about his own country.
November 25th, 2005 at 3:48 pmAccording to Judd’s editing standards, Throatwarbler just said, “I…love…rape and torture…and possession of child porno…like…money…
November 25th, 2005 at 3:51 pmI think Ann and her fellow travelers should put their money where their mouth is and leave the security of their cozy offices and join Representative Murtha in VA Hospitals in Walter Reed and other military hospitals. Ann needs to spend quality time with the women and men who are giving of themselves in a war they didn’t vote for. Ann needs to spend a considerable amount of her time and money and go to Iraq and live with the grunts. She shouldn’t stay in the green zone. She belongs in the Humvees, in the Blackhawks and on the front lines of the conflict she is so in love with. Ann needs to spend less time on Fox News and writing for other media outlets and more quality time with good men and women on the front lines.
It is astounding that most of the policy makers of this debacle and their apologists like Ms. Coulter have never taken the time to serve their country. They are parasites who really hate America and Americans. They don’t relish our democracy and diversity but instead feel threatened by that which makes us American.
Congressman Murtha has balls and the time has come for men and women of conscience and fortitude to demand a new direction for our country. Representative Murtha is a patriot. Jack Murtha makes me proud to be an American and a veteran. Long life and health to Jack Murtha and those like him.
November 25th, 2005 at 3:56 pmAn expose done recently by a rightwinger showed that Ann Coulter ‘lied’ about the church she belonged to. The pastor had never even heard of her, and she had no membership there. He said he had to ‘google’ her to find out who she was.
Just another example of republican propaganda, and ‘fake’ credentials like those of BinBush.
November 25th, 2005 at 3:56 pmConservative group denounces Ann Coulter as a fraud and ‘fake’.
http://www.bradblog.com/archives/00001939.htm
November 25th, 2005 at 3:57 pmwwallace:
Everyone is free to read the whole article and make their own judgement about the part I excerpted. You still haven’t explained how what I wrote is out of context. You may want to get around to that at some point.
November 25th, 2005 at 4:03 pmwwwwwwaaaaaallllllaaaaacccceee – Ann says “There is no plausible explanation for the Democrats’ behavior other than that they long to see U.S. troops shot, humiliated, and driven from the field of battle.” No elipses, no hacking, just a straight quote from Ann. Do you honestly believe that she is right? Do you really think there are Americans walking in your midst that are wishing that US troops get shot and humiliated?
It’s a rhetorical question ww so don’t bother replying. We all know that’s exaclty what you believe. I feel sad for you that you are so mistaken about your fellow Americans.
November 25th, 2005 at 4:04 pmEvery time I hear or read Ann Colter crap I am reminded of squaking vulters fighting over their big bites at the American dinner table. This ugly person is a neocon whore….Blessings
November 25th, 2005 at 4:07 pmJudd, You titled your post, “Coulter on Murtha…” but the part you exerpted didn’t refer to Murtha. How much do they pay you for your anti-American propaganda?
November 25th, 2005 at 4:08 pm“Zwack, your comments are pure BS. Judd hacked up Coulter’s article in order to lie about it. Judd lies for a living. He’s paid to lie about his own country.” – wwallace
Well, thank you for your reasoned debate. You should have read the original article and seen that it said what it was claimed it said. I’m sorry it doesn’t have more pictures for you.
If Judd was going to hack the article up he wouldn’t have pointed to it so that everyone could verify what it really said.
I didn’t see Judd saying anything about his own country, merely about an article written by Ann Coulter. If she is a country I’ll be surprised.
The fact that you can’t reason, understand, or debate explains a lot about your political views.
Z.
November 25th, 2005 at 4:09 pm“Do you really think there are Americans walking in your midst that are wishing that US troops get shot and humiliated?”
Do you think the people at the communist-affiliated Intl. ANSWER marches who suggested that troops frag their officers and so forth support US troops? IF so, then you are mentally retarded.
November 25th, 2005 at 4:11 pm“Dissent is the highest form of patriotism.”
Thomas Jefferson
“All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent.” Thomas Jefferson
November 25th, 2005 at 4:13 pmSupprting the enemy is not “dissent.”
November 25th, 2005 at 4:16 pmwwallace is either a KKK member or a nazi or a John Bircher. He should be ignored because he adds nothing to discourse here. He is like a fart in a crowded room. He just drops his little bombs as he moves around.
November 25th, 2005 at 4:16 pmCoulter equates dissent with supporting the enemy. She is simply ignorant of the constitution or she ius delusional. Probably both.
November 25th, 2005 at 4:18 pmI slept with Ann.. she wasn’t too bad after I stuck a sock in her mouth.
November 25th, 2005 at 4:18 pm“Judd, You titled your post, “Coulter on Murtha…†but the part you exerpted didn’t refer to Murtha. How much do they pay you for your anti-American propaganda?” – wwallace
Let’s see… Would it be the part that says “Democrats like Murtha” that doesn’t refer to Murtha? Or would it be the other two paragraphs… The ones that are about “Democrats”. Last I heard Murtha is a Democrat. While a reference to a member of a set does not necessarily apply to the entire set, a reference to a set would apply to every member of that set. Remember universal affirmatives can only be partially converted. References to Democrats apply to Murtha, references to “Democrats like Murtha” apply to Murtha. Why do you find this so confusing.
Z.
November 25th, 2005 at 4:19 pmI too sent an email to the company that sponsors her sick crap. Told them to dump her and her rants in the garbage. As for the suggestion made above that she join the Playboy Bunnies: I can’t thing of anything more disgusting that seeing her in one of those costumes. Such a picture would have me “going” from both ends at the same time.
November 25th, 2005 at 4:20 pm#80 Marie, LOL!
November 25th, 2005 at 4:20 pm“Supprting the enemy is not “dissent.â€
Comment by wwallace”
Then you should stop torturing and using WMDs, because that supports the enemy. But then again, when republicans trained, recruited and equiped AlQueda in the first place, americans should have figured out what traitors you whacko republican terrorists are.
November 25th, 2005 at 4:22 pmClearly her column is an ill-timed April fools joke: “As we now know, Saddam Hussein was working with al-Qaida and was trying to acquire long-range missiles from North Korea and enriched uranium from Niger.”
November 25th, 2005 at 4:29 pmNew Idea For Ann Coulter: STFU.
November 25th, 2005 at 4:30 pmwwallace is likely a post-adolescent with arrested development. His hero is william wallace of the middle ages, and there is the historical era from which he draws his views of law and order in a society.
November 25th, 2005 at 4:30 pmHe should be ignored until he retreats to his room to play with his tin soldiers.
In post number 13, Dennis said, ### Drives me crazy trying to figure out if they believe what they say or believe in the pay. ###
Dennis makes a very good point here. She’s just in this for the money. She, like the Busch gang, don’t really give a crap about anything, except the greenback.
Does anyone ever notice the smug little smile Eva Braun, err..I meant Anne Coulter has whenever she is spewing the venomus crap out of her mouth?
She says this stuff to inflame us.
She is an inflamer.
She is inflameous.
And when we let her rouse us, she sits back with a simmering cup of herbal tea, and giggles quietly to herself.
I don’t think she really believes, or cares about half of what she says. She is just a vulture, a scavenger, swooping in to feed when she smells blood.
Hey Anne, mind if we start calling you “BUZZARD”?
November 25th, 2005 at 4:31 pmThe woamn doesn’t even know the name of the man she is libeling: “In an upbeat speech now being aired repeatedly on al-Jazeera, last week Rep. JOHN Murtha said….” (emphasis obviously added)
November 25th, 2005 at 4:33 pmI think it’s great that people of different political view points can use this as a forum to debate. But let’s try not to let this thread degenerate into a series of ad hominem attacks.
As to wallace’s claim that the section that I quote doesn’t refer to Murtha: the “they” refers to Democrats who advocate sending the troops out of Iraq. Coulter herself uses Murtha as the leading example of someone in that category. So she is referring to Murtha.
November 25th, 2005 at 4:35 pmActually Bob, I hate to correct you, but Jack is just short for John. His real name is John P. Murtha.
Don’t think your gonna get a cunning and crafty fox like Eva, oops, did it again, Anne, with something as simple as that.
True, she is the female incarnate of the Anti-Christ but she ain’t no dummy.
WORFEUS
November 25th, 2005 at 4:40 pmRYAN NEAT:
That is the nail on the head as far as Iraq is concerned Ryan.
What we can’t just seem to explain to republicans and the chrisitan right, is that if we were invaded, by same a benevolant occupier, like the China-Russo alliance, and if they were just doing it for “regime change” because we have “weapons of mass destruction” and they were here in their minds to “restore democracy” to the American people, we would fight them, kill them, anyway we could.
We would never stop, as long as they had “boots on the ground” on American soil. Well at least most of us would.
Perhaps Anne Coulter and her right wings cronies who thing the Iraqi people should collaborate with us, would collaborate as well.
Course then when we finally repelled our benevolant but misguided Chinese-Russian masters, everyone who collaborated with the enemy would end up on the business end of a rope, streching it with their necks.
WORFEUS
November 25th, 2005 at 4:51 pmZwack, your comments are pure BS. Judd hacked up Coulter’s article in order to lie about it. Judd lies for a living. He’s paid to lie about his own country.
Comment by wwallace — November 25, 2005 @ 3:48 pm
wwallece, please explain how Judd’s quotes from Coulter’s article misrepresent what Coulter wrote, i.e., how Judd’s excerpts distort Coulter’s stated opinion on the Democrats and Murtha, and how she did not call Democrats traitors.
Please explain how Coulter’s article should be read instead.
November 25th, 2005 at 4:52 pmAnd You wonder Why I,ll NEVER!EVER! Join the Military To Defend Your Freedoms?
November 25th, 2005 at 4:57 pmJust Read some of Your Comments.
Nothing But HATE!
I Like the way and Fact that China is Humbling, Calm, And Not out Attacking Each other the way americans are.
think I,ll move to China.
Judd, You titled your post, “Coulter on Murtha…” but the part you exerpted didn’t refer to Murtha. How much do they pay you for your anti-American propaganda?
Comment by wwallace — November 25, 2005 @ 4:08 pm
From Judd’s excerpt:
“It is simply a fact that Democrats like Murtha are encouraging the Iraqi insurgents when they say the war is going badly and it’s time to bring the troops home”
There it is – Murtha’s last name. Please explain how this does not refer to Murtha.
Please clarify: Is it Anti-American to criticise Ann Coulter?
November 25th, 2005 at 4:57 pmencourage Ms Cracker to keep talking like this. it helps to show the fringe for what they are. there is nothing you can do about the ones that are so far gone that they whistle dixie. But Cracker makes the more rational folks that lean right question their affiliation with the wackos.
November 25th, 2005 at 5:00 pmuse that email address and encourage the company to have her jag on all she wants. After all, it helps create more and more moderate voices for the next elections. So does Limbaughtomy, he is so helpful to progressives. Trying to change these folks is like teaching a pig to sing, it wastes your time and annoys the pig
Why does the pathetic media give her so much air time ?!
mAnn Coulter is an evil Demon who is totally pathetic and unAmerican in every way .
The Bush media just lives for mAnn Coulter Which is why I do not bother with our American Fascist media .
November 25th, 2005 at 5:01 pm#101 hi Susan,
“Why does the pathetic media give her so much air time ?!”
it’s because people of lower intelligence need things explaining to them in simple black-and-white terms so they can understand. Ann communicates this way. The problem is the people of lower intelligence then understand things in simple black-and-white terms, hence extremists are formed. It serves the extreme republican agenda as most extremists are people of lower intelligence.
November 25th, 2005 at 5:15 pmWell, We allready Know that China is well ahead of the Game and that They will Win, Considering the Fact that They Have the Majority of the Worlds Population and is becoming the Strongest Economical Nation In the Entire World!
November 25th, 2005 at 5:17 pmAmerica cant even win the War it started in Afganistan And Iraq! let alone Get out!
We Americans Are now The Prisoners.
I sent this to her publisher:
As a Viet Nam vet, I am outraged that this lunatic is allowed to smear veterans and other patriotic americans under your auspices. Someone of her shallow intellect, crass rudeness and hatred could only have gotten to her current media gas-bag position by spending a lot of time on her knees, using more appropriate oral skills.
Is that why she is on your payroll?
Marv
November 25th, 2005 at 5:18 pmTo Eva Braun,, oops, there I go again, I mean Anne Coulter.
Let me tell you about what “emboldens†our enemies.
Our enemies are emboldened by watching our military breakdown in the quagmire of Iraq, learning, watching our tactics and seeing our weapons, how effective, or not effective they are. Before Iraq, everyone thought we had more troops, and more capabilities. Now they know we don’t.
Our enemies are emboldened by seeing we are not tactically as smart as we thought we were, putting troops into a massive insurgency that ensures the deaths of several of them every day.
Our enemies are emboldened by seeing American cruelty in places like Abu Ghraib, and Guantanamo.
Our enemies are emboldened by seeing us revert to using chemical weapons, and breaking other international laws and committing war crimes, the same crimes that we claimed were the basis of our invasion of Iraq.
But what terrifies our enemies, our real enemies, is our capability for discourse, protest and self examination.
Lil Georgy is right about one thing, “they hate us for our freedomâ€. Too bad that you do as well, Ms Brau…..err…….I mean Coulter.
November 25th, 2005 at 5:19 pmNo Thanks to Religion!
November 25th, 2005 at 5:20 pmCalling Ms. Coulter names serves no purpose. And calling poster “wwallace” a “retard” provides no benefit and only lowers the level of debate down to that of a childish spat.
In regard to Ms. Coulter’s position that all democrats are traitorous cowards that want to bring harm to their fellow americans, it is an absurd claim that is almost too easy to refute. However, the focus should be on refuting the claim and making the obvious counter-points that such a position opens itself up for. For example, one could argue that under-armoring the troops, ignoring the poor, and having unqualified management in charge of emergency services has harmed more americans than any administration/political party in history.
Now, poster “wwallace” was responded to with facts and articulate rebuttals by numerous people to which wwallace only spewed out insults and baseless accusations. This is unfortunate for wwallace as it missed the opportunity to engage in a coherent and considered debate. However, my experience is that the majority of discussions here maintain the civility and integrity that one should expect in a public conversation and for that the operators of this blog should be commended.
My thoughts are that the “high road” should be the path of choice and that those who attempt to drag people down into the muck in an attempt to derail intelligent conversation should be dismissed and ignored so as to allow them to wallow in the mud without company.
Live well.
November 25th, 2005 at 5:23 pm#105.
November 25th, 2005 at 5:23 pmWhen You say”Our Enemies” for whom do you speak For. They are not my Enemies.
My Enemies are close to me at home.America is my Enemy.
Not the World.
#107.
November 25th, 2005 at 5:27 pmMy thoughts are that the “high road†should be the path of choice????
Its allways about, MEMEMEME, Isnt it?
My Thoughts are the only thoughts that matter.
Is this what you mean, Pessimist?
If we go Down, You go down with US!
Be careful Me. Others listen to words.
November 25th, 2005 at 5:29 pmIf me don,t care, then, me need no one to stand up for me, therefore , me must fight me on battles by meself,me.
signed’
ME.
Wow,Wallace, you sound like my kind of man….Dumb!!!
November 25th, 2005 at 5:32 pmvs
November 25th, 2005 at 5:32 pmBe Careful We. Others listen to Words.
If WE don,t care,then,We need no one to stand up for US,therefore we must fight OUR on Battles by OURSELVES.us.
Signed`
WE.
the whole world sits and listens to OUR Mumbling and Grumbling, thinking, what in the World is Wrong over there.
November 25th, 2005 at 5:36 pmhrmp. something MUST be wrong. they are allways Arguing and Don,t seem to know what about.
To freedom is not free.
I mean Bin Laden and his boys, who as we speak, are relaxing somewhere in the Casmire region, where Bush and the republican war machine are too afraid to go.
So instead of fighting them, we are busy in Iraq creating all new ones.
November 25th, 2005 at 5:37 pmConfusing, isnt it?
November 25th, 2005 at 5:38 pmThere is but only One God, and He is the Leader as well as the Creator! Listen To Him.
And they were a Noisome and Grevious people. therefore I will destroy them.
GENESIS CHAPTER 6
——————————————————————————–
November 25th, 2005 at 5:38 pm1 ¶ And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them,
2 That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose.
3 ¶ And the LORD said, My spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also is flesh: yet his days shall be an hundred and twenty years.
4 ¶ There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.
5 And GOD saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually.
6 ¶ And it repented the LORD that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him at his heart.
7 And the LORD said, I will destroy man whom I have created from the face of the earth; both man, and beast, and the creeping thing, and the fowls of the air; for it repenteth me that I have made them.
READ Verse 5.
November 25th, 2005 at 5:40 pmPST NUMBER 111 said: Wow,Wallace, you sound like my kind of man….Dumb!!!
Comment by Ann Coulter — November 25, 2005 @ 5:32 pm
Are we supposed to believe this is the real Ann Coulter?
Or is this someone who created a handle and is plagerizing her name?
November 25th, 2005 at 5:43 pmYou are “FREE: TO Believe whatever your little heat desires, WORFEUS”.
November 25th, 2005 at 5:47 pm(Hoax).
freedom is not free,
When I preface a comment with “My thoughts”, that means that I am expressing what I think so that the reader can understand that I am not being dictatorial or condescending. So, do you have a different opinion?
In regard to your other posts where you attempt to quote the bible, you are not applying relevant passages nor do you complete the thoughts. Your quote from Genesis in post #116 does not follow up with God’s covenant. Do you know that of which I speak.
And lastly, “Freedom” is free for it was God who gave us free will, aka freedom. God did not sell it to us or tell us that we have to kill for it. I kid you not, look it up.
November 25th, 2005 at 5:49 pmDarn, I figured as much,
I was naivly hoping we might actually get to debate, (and kick the ass therof) of a full fledged member of the republican propaganda ministry.
Oh well….
November 25th, 2005 at 5:50 pmhehe
November 25th, 2005 at 5:51 pmIm tired, Im going to bed. Gdnite all.
November 25th, 2005 at 5:51 pmOh dear. If people don’t know that Couter is low class…..you can’t tell them. Duh.
November 25th, 2005 at 5:53 pmGet a life folks. Lets pull together and get some reason going….get it back. Coulter sounds like a dysfuncional teenager. Why do Americans accept this level of dialogue? I’ll give my theory. Cause we have fallen folks….fallen down to her level. Americans are not as educated as they once were, more spoiled, and have bought the crap that we are the greatest country on earth for too long. A country has to earn that. And it’s earned with class, nobility, knowledge, and character. None of these adjectives describe someone that can get down to Coulter’s level of personal sliming and irrational argument. Now I know how countries go down….it’s when the citizens forget politeness, reason, compassion, and honesty. The one liner people that want to throw their little pile of shit and feel powerful with their little “zingers” are pathetic. They don’t think. They just feel and they destroy ….fighting the other half of America when we should all be looking at our leadership……look where our country is for God’s sake…..you think this “just happened?” Divide and conquer…duh
Pessimist,
wwallace is a typical example of the self-professed “conservatives” who pollute Think Progress’ threads with hate-filled language, racial slurs, sexual and scatological references, as well as openly insulting comments about anyone who disagrees with them. Dissent and disagreement are not an option for them.
Very few times have I had the chance to actually engage any of them in an exchange of ideas. I think the nicest word wwallace has had for me was “imbecile”.
I have (very) conservative friends and relatives -they are nothing like the ones you will find here. Most of these “conservatives” come here to unload their frustrations, anger, and are very quick to hurl the worst insults they can think of.
If you are new to this blog, you better brace yourself.
November 25th, 2005 at 5:56 pmYes Gregor,
November 25th, 2005 at 6:02 pmI hear you . I think that this is like a fad….this way of discourse. It’s the “in” thing to hurl these vicious stupid one or two line responses. But fads pass. I mean it. It wasn’t like this 5 years ago. People couldn’t have imagined the low class level of dialogue that is almost expected now. Doesn’t it make you afraid for our country? It does me. Cause the people that are hurling are not interested in doing the work of thinking about our future in a serious way. They are shooting themselves in the foot by attacking fellow Americans. Just what Rove wants…why else does he keep stoking the liberal / conservative fight with his filthy comments? The people playing into it…..They aren’t serious. They think Democracy was delivered by the stork.
Suzanne,
I was specially taken aback by the Jerry-Springuesque discourse that I have found here. It reminds me of people who, upon having their beliefs challenged in a serious way, get very aggressive.
That aggresion is specially vicious in a blog where everyone can post opinions anonymously -since it allows people to say things they wouldn’t otherwise. Much less in public.
I said it before: What we have here is these people’s true self. And pretty, it ain’t.
November 25th, 2005 at 6:08 pmHave you ever noticed the look on Ann’s face when she speaks? It’s as if she is astonished hearing her own voice, similar to a puppet hearing his voice push against the air for the first time. Take a look next time, it’ll be fun. Dear God, I have way too much time on my hands.
November 25th, 2005 at 6:13 pmGregor,
I understand what you are saying and have certainly seen plenty of examples of the raging conservative of which you speak. It is disappointing, but I try not to let it bother me. I have found from my experiences that people jump into fights, either physically or verbally, only when they are insecure in their argument or themselves.
As for “bracing myself”, I’m not worried. The benefit of the amount of intelligent discourse and sharing of ideas far outweighs the risk of stumbling across a troll or two.
November 25th, 2005 at 6:18 pmWell said Gregor and Pessimist. It’s almost like parallel track. On one side people are actually discussing, on the other they are like the clown squiting the seltzer bottles and making crude noises. I think that our country has begun a self searching period. I don’t, unfortunately, think that Bush came from the stork either. He came from……….us. The American people. He represents a lot of what this country has become. Now we have to do the work to start a new life and it ain’t easy. Like an addict that has to choose. We’re at a fork in the road.
November 25th, 2005 at 6:24 pmha ha. Correction. “Squirting” That’s my contribution to one liners.
November 25th, 2005 at 6:29 pmhttp://www.dailykos.com/
good article on Kos about Coulter
November 25th, 2005 at 6:33 pmOMG
Coulter was just on CNN talking like I-RIGHT-I. Connection? I will bet money on it.
I-RIGHT-I = Anne Coulter
Welcome Anne! Now go away.
November 25th, 2005 at 6:39 pmNo Spudge, thats the just the stepford syndrome making them sound that way.
But if it is Ms Braun, dam, did it again, I mean Ms Coulter, then by no means drive her away. I’ve always wanted a chance to debate one of these neo-con talking heads.
Joe Shmoe meets Berlin Betty.
WORFEUS
November 25th, 2005 at 6:45 pmBTW,
Ms Coulter, if you are reading any of this, what makes you think that given the lack of electricity most of the time, that the Iraqi insurgents are sitting around watching TV?
And if they are watching TV, then what makes you think they have access to american televsion shows to listen to American liberals?
I doubt any of the insurgents are sitting around gaining motivation to kill our troops by watching Hardball.
Since the first Century and the days of the Knights Templar, “boots on the ground” in their own holy land is all the motivation they ever needed.
WORFEUS
November 25th, 2005 at 6:53 pmI don’t know, maybe it’s just me. I mean, is Anne short for Anorexic, or is she being a skinny-assed bitch just a coincidence? And that pinched face on TV, either she’s constipated or she’s frustrated. Boy, I bet she’s lousy in bed.
Correct me if I’m wrong, but nearly all of her vicious attacks are on liberal men. I’m not talking about the Hannity and Limbaugh types who squat to pee, but REAL men like Murtha. I guess that means she’s like I-RIGHT-I and just plan frustrated.
I mean, even a rightwinger like me can see that both of them need to get laid. Maybe the title of her next book ought to read, “How to get Laid by a Liberal, if you must.”
November 25th, 2005 at 6:53 pmIs she physically capable of talking for 30 seconds without uttering the word “treason”? It’s like it’s on a timer in her pea-sized brain.
November 25th, 2005 at 7:08 pmGregor is a typical example of the self-professed “liberals” who pollute Think Progress’ threads with hate-filled language, racial slurs, sexual and scatological references, as well as openly insulting comments about anyone who disagrees with them. Dissent and disagreement are not an option for them.
November 25th, 2005 at 7:09 pm“Whether or not there is any merit to the idea, calling for a troop withdrawal – or “redeployment,” as liberals pointlessly distinguish – will delay our inevitable victory and cost more American lives.”
She left an escape clause in her drivel! Hilarious. Her stance is that responding to public sentiment must be treason. Never obey the will of the people, do not disturb the monarch!
November 25th, 2005 at 7:13 pmWell Gregor, I don’t agree with wwallace. :)
November 25th, 2005 at 7:13 pmAmy, that canard about white phosphorus has already been dispatched numerous times elsewhere, you loon. :()
Comment by wwallace — November 18, 2005 @ 6:19 pm
Why did the US and the USSR work together in WWII, moron? :()
Comment by wwallace — November 18, 2005 @ 7:45 pm
Thererfore, Gregor is either a liar or an illiterate. Or, like many on the left, he could be both. :()
Comment by wwallace — November 20, 2005 @ 10:49 am
Do you have ADD Gregor? Or are you just generally slow-witted? :()
Comment by wwallace — November 18, 2005 @ 2:18 pm
Gregor, (…) That doesn’t nmean other laws do not apply, you imbecile. :()
November 25th, 2005 at 7:15 pmComment by wwallace — November 18, 2005 @ 2:32 pm
As I said, wwallace likes to openly insult people, and then dares to be sanctimonious.
November 25th, 2005 at 7:16 pmGosh, how are we going to get out of this hell our national dialogue has become? I guess it’s going to take the right finally believing the President is a criminal. And I guess it’s going to take more proof. Luckily, it’s on the way
November 25th, 2005 at 7:20 pmGregor, descriptions are not insults. If you want to see brainless insults being hurled, read any of the regular liberal commenters here. Al liberals do is insult.
Suzanne, no sane person believes this president is a criminal. That was the last president.
November 25th, 2005 at 7:25 pmAs a man, she could not get any women. So….she decided to become a woman, shaved her legs, under her arms and had her face defoliated.
Now…..she gets all the women she wants. She is a two bit lesbian whore who will go to any length to get what she wants.
November 25th, 2005 at 7:26 pmOh, so I’m insane….that’s nice of you wwallace.
November 25th, 2005 at 7:27 pmHmmm, wwallace said he/she/it was going to bed earlier but now he/she/it seems to be back. Yet he/she/it has yet to respond to my earlier post where I asked for some clarification on a comment he made about my initial post and some challenges that I put forth in his/her/its usage of biblical texts.
So, wwallace, what is your reply?
November 25th, 2005 at 7:27 pmshe do well in her role as far-out space cadet
it makes all the sheeple think that they are ok, ‘cus even they can think: wow, she crazy
November 25th, 2005 at 7:33 pmAccording to wwallace, ad hominem attacks are not insults, merely descriptions. Nice. Quite a spin.
Back on the topic of the thread:
wwallace, please explain how Judd’s quotes from Coulter’s article misrepresent what Coulter wrote, and explain how her article should be read instead.
Also, please explain how Judd’s excerpt does not refer to Murtha, and clarify if it is Anti-American to criticise Ann Coulter.
November 25th, 2005 at 7:35 pmAnn Coulter=Adolph Clitler.
Also, I have come to the conclusion that WWallace and Ir-right are just the modern extension of the KKK. Instead of spewing hate from behind a sheet they hide behind a keyboard.
-GSD
November 25th, 2005 at 7:35 pmIts about time someone spoke up about the tone and language used here, wwallace #138 by the “self-professed liberals” as you called them. And you are right to piously take the high road. Have you seen what some of them are calling Anne Coulter? Bitch, slut, etc. It’s almost outrageous!
Correct me if I’m wrong, but those sexual references are most inappropriate! Redneck bashing and insults to conservatives—-. Oooops. For a moment there I was forgetting about I-RIGHT-I, NED, and even your posts badgering and attacking.
I mean, really, wwallace, you have to agree, don’t you think Coulter would be a scary broad to wake up next to if you had a hangover? You’d have to ask yourself who was the dominate one, you know, and hope she wasn’t just another Republican male in drag.
November 25th, 2005 at 7:36 pmAlso logic and right wing should never be used in the same sentence.
-GSD
November 25th, 2005 at 7:37 pmPlease let me know if this means my son, a Democrat in route to Iraq, can cancel his orders. Seems only Republicans are pure enough to fight this wa.
November 25th, 2005 at 7:39 pm#129.Double Talk. I lied,sorry.
November 25th, 2005 at 7:40 pmI have found from my experiences that people jump into fights, either physically or verbally, only when they are insecure in their argument or themselves.
comment#108.
November 25th, 2005 at 7:46 pmI am Sorry again. wwallace didn,t write that.I am sorry wwallace.
good for you Pessimist.
November 25th, 2005 at 7:53 pmYou know, not that I have anything against a bit o piss n vinegar now and then, but I think people have forgotten what it was like to get along. Even during Clinton this disease hadn’t taken hold. Not like it is now. Does anyone remember when we were one country ( well, I know that’s a stretch but…) and we talked about all sorts of other things? We’re all prisoners of this Right / Left war….and for the life of me, it’s getting harder to remember what it was like without this crap.
November 25th, 2005 at 8:00 pmThe Fabulous C. wouldn`t know a real warrior hero if she were in the same room as one. Her annoying schtick is to co-opt the sentiment many Americans have for those willing to serve in uniform and then beat up on perceived political opponents by using the traitor/treason card. Witness the Pat Tillman saga. She should be sent to the frontlines in The War on Terra immediately!
November 25th, 2005 at 8:20 pmI already explained it Gregor. If you missed it, that’s your problem.
November 25th, 2005 at 8:22 pmI have just shot this email across to UPS. Coulter is an absolute DISGRACE!!
“Enough is enough! I have just come acroos her comments on Murtha “loning to see US troops shot, humiliated, etc, etc”
If you knew what impression of the USA that this woman creates overseas you would not only get rid of her column but completely disassociate yourselves from the drivel that she espouses.
Believe me, she’s bad news!”
November 25th, 2005 at 8:30 pmyes Aussie…..I know. It’s just terrible. Once again, this is where folks show her the door: lsalem@amuniversal.com.
November 25th, 2005 at 8:34 pm#68 – “Congressman Murtha has balls …”(Don Watkins)and he is juggling them!! Congressman served our country in a war and for that, I thank him. But since Viet Nam, when the going gets tough, the wimps go running. When is the last time the NYT or BBC ran a positive story regarding Iraq? Sadly, people like Murtha have become posters boys for the “cut and run” progs at Think Pessimism
#136 – I mean, even a rightwinger like me can see that both of them need to get laid. Maybe the title of her next book ought to read, “How to get Laid by a Liberal, if you must.†– Comment by Joe Sixpack
November 25th, 2005 at 8:34 pm****Why would any red-blooded American woman want to “get laid by a liberal”????? The “robust manliness” (HA!) of pencil neck geeks like John Podesta, Alan Colmes, Jimmy Cardigan, JF Kerry, etc. and the level of their progressive conversation would put me to sleep! Zzzzz…Zzzzz….Zzzz…..
I love making fun of the chickenhawks. They’re such easy marks.
But you’re right, I shouldn’t pick on mentals. In my defense, if the mentals would stay where they belong I wouldn’t pick on them. They love a good spanking or they wouldn’t be here begging for them.
Spank the mentals, if they don’t like it they can go away, its that simple.
November 25th, 2005 at 8:35 pmAnd let us never forget when top left-wing blogger Markos “Kos” Moulitsas Zuniga heard of four American contractors being savagely murdered and mutilated in Iraq, and said in reaction,”Screw them.”
A patriotic reaction? The reaction of a person who wants his country to prevail? Nope.
November 25th, 2005 at 8:36 pmYeah! The Hermaphrodite is here!
November 25th, 2005 at 8:37 pmI guess I scared them away again. Must be getting crowded under the hermaphrodites bed.
November 25th, 2005 at 8:47 pm“When is the last time the NYT or BBC ran a positive story regarding Iraq? ”
Oh Mighty Norma Desmond, why don’t YOU tell us everything peaches and cream about Iraq?
After all, you are the delusion queen of the blogosphere.
November 25th, 2005 at 8:49 pmGay man asks judge for spousal protection
November 25th, 2005 at 8:52 pmhttp://www.cnn.com/rssclick/2005/LAW/11/25/school.scandal.ap/index.html?section=cnn_topstories
I already explained it Gregor. If you missed it, that’s your problem.
Comment by wwallace — November 25, 2005 @ 8:22 pm
Of all your posts, I found only four that are actually relevant to the topic of the thread. The rest are attacks on other people, or tangent remarks (Clinton, liberals, etc.).
First, three posts on the use of ellipsis:
What a dishonest use of ellipses, Judd. Not that dishonesty from the paid propagandists of ThinkFailure is any surprise.
Judd said, “I love…Saddam Hussein…and Osama bin Ladin …too.â€
Comment by wwallace — November 25, 2005 @ 2:53 pm
Judd hacked up Coulter’s article in order to lie about it. Judd lies for a living. He’s paid to lie about his own country.
Comment by wwallace — November 25, 2005 @ 3:48 pm
According to Judd’s editing standards, Throatwarbler just said, “I…love…rape and torture…and possession of child porno…like…money…
Comment by wwallace — November 25, 2005 @ 3:51 pm
All of these are statements of opinion, not explanations of your opinions. Let alone facts.
Again, please explain how Judd’s excerpt misrepresents what Coulter wrote. In your opinion, how should her article should be read instead?
And one on the subject of the thread itself:
Judd, You titled your post, “Coulter on Murtha…†but the part you exerpted didn’t refer to Murtha. How much do they pay you for your anti-American propaganda?
Comment by wwallace — November 25, 2005 @ 4:08 pm
Here Judd clearly quoted Coulter talking about Murtha. Please explain how his quote does not refer to Murtha.
Finally, you implied that criticising Coulter is Anti-American. In your opinion, is it Anti-American to criticise Ann Coulter?
You have complained in the past about us “liberals” not allowing you to fully explain your opinions, and insulting you -here I am asking you to do so. Without insults.
November 25th, 2005 at 8:55 pmIf criticising Coulter makes me un-American so be it.
Ann Coulter is whore.
November 25th, 2005 at 9:05 pm#127 Gregor, those of us who have nothing to hide do not post anonymously.
wwwwwallace can call me anytime, he knows where I live, what business I’m in and has used his oportunity to make fun of my looks many times.
I know he won’t call or come over to my house because he’s a sissy. If I thought otherwise, I wouldn’t put my info out there for everyone to see.
November 25th, 2005 at 9:13 pmI don’t have a weblink, but there’s a photo from the WWII liberation of Paris that invariably reminds me of Ann Coulter. It shows a smartly-dressed Frenchwoman, quite clearly a Nazi collaborator, while she tries to outrun some neighbors who just shaved her head.
ADVICE TO ANN: Get a haircut!
November 25th, 2005 at 9:13 pmSuzanne
Your posts,#s 124 and 126 are a reflection of a wonderful, alert mind. It’s reassuring to know there are others out there who can articulate passion in a precise and thoughtful manner. Thank you and good night.
November 25th, 2005 at 9:34 pmRyan bin Ladin,
When you actually are capable of adding something other than nonsense and retarded talking points, people might actually give your claims that the other side only insults. All you do is make ad hominem attacks on conservatives, and smear people without proof.
November 25th, 2005 at 9:37 pmGregor, “Finally, you implied that criticising Coulter is Anti-American.”
Since this is a complete and total lie, you have done nothing but prove you are unworthy of being taken at all seriously.
November 25th, 2005 at 9:39 pmSusan is only half right. I know she lives in a mental facility. I don’t know which one.
November 25th, 2005 at 9:40 pm“Gregor is a typical example of the self-professed “liberals†who pollute Think Progress’ threads with hate-filled language, racial slurs, sexual and scatological references, as well as openly insulting comments about anyone who disagrees with them. Dissent and disagreement are not an option for them.” – wwallace.
Let me change one or two words in that…
Gregor becomes wwallace (btw I hope that name is not based on William Wallace of Elerslie because I suspect he wouldn’t like the comparison)
Liberals becomes Conservatives… Yup, that fits.
Wwallace, I have asked straightforward, simple questions. Shown where I disagreed and asked for your comment. I tried to debate in a reasoned manner. You insulted me in exchange. As a result I included a few ad hominem asides in some of my responses. At no point have you given anything that passes for a rational argument. If you would like to try again it’s easy.
Give one place where either a) Judd took Ann Coulter’s words out of context or b) an example of where the phrase “Democrats like Murtha” or later “Democrats” does not apply to Jack Murtha? All I ask is one example. We can take it from there.
By The Way you might also want to read the following http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~norman/Jokes-file/LogicProfessor.html it might help explain some common logical fallacies.
Z.
November 25th, 2005 at 9:42 pmZwack, I see no reason to answer a question I already answered before.
November 25th, 2005 at 9:48 pmRyan bin Ladin is not a pacifist, he’s for the other side.
As an aside, readers will note that no liberal here has offered a single criticism of Ryan’s deranged comments.
November 25th, 2005 at 9:51 pmGregor, “Finally, you implied that criticising Coulter is Anti-American.â€
Since this is a complete and total lie, you have done nothing but prove you are unworthy of being taken at all seriously.
Comment by wwallace — November 25, 2005 @ 9:39 pm
So you seem to say criticising Coulter is not anti-American. I finally got an answer, of sorts. We are making, ahem, progress.
Now, how about answering my other questions?
November 25th, 2005 at 9:51 pmGregor, all of your silly questions have been answered. You’re not interested in any sort of honest debate, you’re interested in playing games.
November 25th, 2005 at 9:53 pmDaily news, Sixth image down.
November 25th, 2005 at 9:57 pmRyan, check out comment #188
November 25th, 2005 at 9:58 pmYou’re not interested in any sort of honest debate, you’re interested in playing games.
Comment by wwallace — November 25, 2005 @ 9:53 pm
All I am doing is asking questions -you usually assert something but provide no evidence.
If you go to my post #169, you will see that I looked for answers to my questions, but could only find four post by you that were actually relevant. Those were the comments that prompted me to ask you. So far, I have seen no explanation.
How am I supposed to debate if you refuse to explain the points I want to debate on?
November 25th, 2005 at 10:00 pmGregor, I answered your questions. How am I supposed to debate you, when you lie about what’s been said?
November 25th, 2005 at 10:05 pm#193, Ryan’s mommy must’ve called bedtime.
November 25th, 2005 at 10:06 pm“Zwack, I see no reason to answer a question I already answered before.” – wwallace
I have just searched through this entire page for all of your comments, just in case I missed it.
No, you didn’t answer any of my questions or comments. You stated I was talking BS, you accused people of things, but you never showed any proof of anything. If youposted it as someone other than wwallace then you’ll need to tell me which name you used.
Unless you can start debating rationally then nothing you say is likely to be of any interest to me.
Stating an opinion and then repeating it does not count as an argument unless you are a member of the Monty Python team.
Z.
November 25th, 2005 at 10:08 pmGregor, I answered your questions. How am I supposed to debate you, when you lie about what’s been said?
Comment by wwallace — November 25, 2005 @ 10:05 pm
Please point me to your answers. What numbers do they have in this thread?
November 25th, 2005 at 10:11 pmGregor, They’re not there if they are under the name wwallace. I searched the entire page for every reference to that name. There is no debate. He accuses Judd of lying through editing, and he states that “Democrats” doesn’t mean “Murtha”… Other than that there are no posts that consist of anything other than insults.
I tried, you tried. I even did my best not to insult him too much (sometimes it’s too hard not to throw in an ad hominem aside)…
Z.
November 25th, 2005 at 10:15 pmZwack,
Yes, I combed the entire thread… again, I only found four relevant post by wwallace. And those were the comments I asked about.
All I need is the number of the comment(s). Is that too much to ask?
November 25th, 2005 at 10:17 pmwwallace-
What’s the point of answering your questions when you ignore the answers. How many times do peole here have to explain it to you? Are we typing too fast for you? Unless you stand with us and refute the vile and anti-American statements of people like Coulter, we have to assume that you agree with her. Thus, you are part of the problem, not the solution.
November 25th, 2005 at 10:17 pmwwallace,
How ’bout you and I get together some time? I just love the cut of your jib. You sound so macho with your bad-ass conservative talk- it makes me hot and tingly. I bet you’re a real tiger in the sack.
Jeff
November 25th, 2005 at 10:23 pmMaybe what Ann Coulter needs is to hear from some people from her own camp on why being in Iraq is a bad idea.
____________________________________________________
I think that the proposition of going to Baghdad is also fallacious. I think if we were going to remove Saddam Hussein we would have had to go all the way to Baghdad, we would have to commit a lot of force because I do not believe he would wait in the Presidential Palace for us to arrive. I think we’d have had to hunt him down. And once we’d done that and we’d gotten rid of Saddam Hussein and his government, then we’d have had to put another government in its place.
What kind of government? Should it be a Sunni government or Shi’i government or a Kurdish government or Ba’athist regime? Or maybe we want to bring in some of the Islamic fundamentalists? How long would we have had to stay in Baghdad to keep that government in place? What would happen to the government once U.S. forces withdrew?
How many casualties should the United States accept in that effort to try to create clarity and stability in a situation that is inherently unstable? I think it is vitally important for a President to know when to use military force.
I think it is also very important for him to know when not to commit U.S. military force. And it’s my view that the President got it right both times, that it would have been a mistake for us to get bogged down in the quagmire inside Iraq.â€
Richard Cheney, April 29, 1991
November 25th, 2005 at 10:27 pm_______________________________________________________
“and the question in my mind is how many additional American casualties is Saddam worth?
And the answer is not very damned many.â€
-Richard Cheney, August, 1992
November 25th, 2005 at 10:28 pm______________________________________________________
If you want to communicate with wwwwwwallace, you must stutter when you type.
The only other thing that will get wwwwallace’s attention is if you offer up a 7 year old little girl.
November 25th, 2005 at 10:29 pmwwallace, what’s a firebreather like you doing in front of a pc, we need that fierce warrior spirit that you show on this board over there in Iraq looking for IED’s and guarding convoys. If you click this link:
http://operationyellowelephant.blogspot.com
You’ll be provided with all the info you need to make your fantasies of manhood a reality.
November 25th, 2005 at 10:56 pmZwack,
wwallaces freedoms have become a stumbling block for the weak. wouldnt you agree?
wwallace, answer this.
November 25th, 2005 at 11:08 pm“Be careful, however, that the exercise of your freedom does not become a stumbling block to the weak.†I Corinthians 8:9
Have Your freedoms Have in Fact become a Stumbling Block to the Weak?
You think Afganis , Iraqis are not weak?
Now Throatwarbler, thats the funniest thing I’ve heard all night.
November 25th, 2005 at 11:11 pmUsing George Bush’s logic (if you can say what he uses qualifies as logic), you should attack your perceived enemy before they have the opportunity to attack you. By this reasoning if any country feels threatened by the United States, they have every right to attack us before we attack them.
So if the neocons remain in power and continue to antagonize much of the world in the same manner as they do now with the same above said pretzel logic, how long will it be before, say, China or Russia or even Germany or Turkey or any combination of these or any other countries attack us because of “their” perceived paranoia of The United States?
But I like to believe that “America” did not attack Iraq in the normal sense. It was attacked by a small faction of power brokers, the most sinister and manipulative special interest group ever conceived… The Project for the New American Century.
Through fear they easily make people like wwallace, Mighty Aphrodite, I-Right-I, Northeast Dilemma, etc. feel empowered (you’re either for us or against us and a true patriot is for us sort of mentality) and more secure because we took (for the first time) the preemptive strategy, projecting the tough guy, we’re not going to wait to be attacked by Iraq attitude. Since the Bush administration has taken this route they have opened a Pandora’s Box for our actual security in the near future. If Bush can justify his actions because he believes he is being directed by God, what is to keep any other country or countries from justifying attacking us for whatever reason they wish to create.
This fear is not perceived or imaginary. It is fast becoming quite real.
November 25th, 2005 at 11:11 pmJust kind of watching this unfold from afar (as usual: note my nationality), but I have to say that Zwack and Gregor have the right idea – just keep asking for proof. Don’t get sucked into childish name-calling or comments about sexual inadequacies and all that bullshit. That’s what they want – a muddy river full of insults. That way it’s a draw and they can walk away thinking no one laid a hand on them cuz you’re just as bad as they are.
Just keep asking for proof. Stop with the childishness. Ann Coulter started this with her nasty, lying, possibly libelous statement. Don’t sink to her level, or worse, the dank level beneath her where all the rest of them lie.
Just ask for proof. Calmy and insistently. Nothing drives a liar crazier.
November 25th, 2005 at 11:19 pm#212. Could never have said it better than you just did.
November 25th, 2005 at 11:21 pmyou must be a professor or highly educated individual to write that up.
and its all so true.
Kudos for Canadian Bystander. Thank you for your support.
November 25th, 2005 at 11:23 pm… Listening to neocons defend their bitter , barren , blonde *itch is HILARIOUS ! And keep growing your hair (m)Ann – it covers your 5:00 shadow in the brighter light of day ( really ) ! As for the gobbling Turkey Day neocons , I have a cheery message for you , too : Papa Fitzmas is bringing even MORE INDICTMENTS for your GOP – the gifts that keep on giving ( neocons nightmares ) ! Merry Fitzmas , and a Happy Fitznukkah to all ! … ;)
November 25th, 2005 at 11:43 pmemail sent
November 25th, 2005 at 11:54 pmFor quotes from the American Taliban..Starring Ann Coulter, of course.
http://www.reandev.com/taliban/
November 26th, 2005 at 12:10 amCoulter’s remarks are basically identical to the demagoguery used by the Nixon administration hatchetmen against Vietnam War protesters. One would hope only those who have drank the Kool Aid take her seriously now. She has so debased the standard of “treason” that she is treasonous for it.
November 26th, 2005 at 12:11 amwwallace-
Earlier you referred to the previous President as a criminal. Excuse me, but no one died just because
November 26th, 2005 at 12:15 amthe President was doin’ the wild thing with an intern.
And yet, the Repuklicans and the pablum tabloid starved media made a bigger deal of it than Bush’s deception of the American public and the soldiers he has sent to their deaths. Now that some in the media has waken up, I hope that the Bush debacle will be a major part of his legacy.
Vote for Chris Christmas to play Santa this year..
http://www.rocketboom.com/vlog/
November 26th, 2005 at 12:17 amYea, don’t pick on Clinton.
He truly lived the motto of his generation, “MAKE LOVE, NOT WAR”.
Of course Busch is doing the same thing, living his generations motto. Too bad their motto is “MAKE WAR, NOT LOVE”
November 26th, 2005 at 12:26 amAnn Coulter love doll..
http://www.johnnygoodtimes.com/archives/ann_coulter_love_doll.jpg
November 26th, 2005 at 12:46 amAnn the chicken choker..
http://www.lizmichael.com/anncoult.gif
November 26th, 2005 at 12:53 amAnn fantasizes about Bill..
http://servercc.oakton.edu/~billtong/BNSP/coulterwishing.jpg
November 26th, 2005 at 12:55 amSlanderous bitch..
http://servercc.oakton.edu/~billtong/bnsp/annslander.jpg
November 26th, 2005 at 12:57 amMiss September..
http://www.newmediamusings.com/blog/images/coulter.gif
November 26th, 2005 at 12:59 amQueen of Hearts..
http://www.internetweekly.org/images/ann_coulter_card.jpg
November 26th, 2005 at 1:03 amKill liberals..
http://www.awitness.org/journal/graphics/tom/coulter.jpg
November 26th, 2005 at 1:07 amCats of the world Unite..
http://cbecker333.homeip.net/webpub/catsAnn.jpg
November 26th, 2005 at 1:09 amAdams Apple..
http://www.rawilson.com/images/coulter.jpg
November 26th, 2005 at 1:11 amMcCoulter..
http://www.bartcop.com/jpg/mccoulter.jpg
November 26th, 2005 at 1:17 amnot only does she spout garbage, she’s hard to watch because she’s not all there
November 26th, 2005 at 7:51 amCan we all remember that this is Coulter. Who cares? She doesn’t speak to intelligent people. She is only followed by nuts. And those nuts are incapable of contributing anything good to our nation. Dismiss her babbling for what it’s worth.
November 26th, 2005 at 9:12 am#230,
I think you have that just right.
November 26th, 2005 at 9:15 amObviously Ms. Coulter is a woman of courage and is prepared to serve her country…… Hold on though, didn’t she run away from a pie ?
November 26th, 2005 at 9:31 am[...] How do these people live with themeselves when spreading such nonsense? As presented on ThinkProgress: Coulter on Murtha: He Longs “To See U.S. Troops Shot, Humiliated†[link] [...]
November 26th, 2005 at 10:00 amThe scary part is that there are people reading and believing her drivel…
November 26th, 2005 at 10:44 amDown with Coulter! She’s not as smart as us!
November 26th, 2005 at 11:03 amSo, if President Bush does talk about withdrawing the troops from Iraq on Wednesday, does that mean that…
a) Ann Coulter will change her opinion
b) The President is “a gutless traitor” who “longs to see U.S. troops shot, humiliated, and driven from the field of battle.”
or
c) None of the above, both Ann and the President are right even though they are expressing opposing views…
My bet is that c is the right answer.
Z.
November 26th, 2005 at 11:11 amFor those who actually followed the link to Coulter’s diatribe, did anyone else notice a comment which showed Annie’s complete and total lack of knowledge of political life in Iraq under Saddam? I refer to her comment:
“The Iraqi people have voted in two free, democratic elections this year. In a rash and unconsidered move, they even gave women the right to vote.”
I guess Annie’s not aware that women ALREADY had the right to vote–they even served in the Iraqi Parliament. Any other consideration would have proved to be a REVERSAL in Iraqi politics.
And as for “wwallace”, he really does need to learn how to answer questions AS THEY ARE POSED. “WWallace”, this comment is addressed directly to you: You LIED. And LIED. And LIED. Every single time that you claimed to have answered a question regarding Judd’s comments which opened this entry on ThinkProgress, you LIED. You never responded to anyone’s questions explaining your assertion that Judd misrepresented Ann’s commentary. The simple fact is that Judd did not misrepresent what Ann wrote as anyone with the barest minimum of reading comprehension would agree. But, go ahead and continue to deflect away if that helps you sleep at night. The rest of us know that Judd did not misrepresent Ann.
November 26th, 2005 at 11:16 amWho let the dog out?? This woman’s so over the cliff nuts that she’s become a cartoon.
November 26th, 2005 at 11:28 amFor a woman with a law degree, she certainly exhibits nothing but ignorance. Her comments are unresearched for fact, and deliberately, personally hateful. She apparently appeals to cretins and other insecure males who get their jollies from watching a smart-ass on their tv sets. She is in the class of O’Reilly — pandering to the most base element of society.
November 26th, 2005 at 12:00 pmThere are now 239 posts and counting in response to Coulter’s hateful rant against Democrats. My advice is to BOYCOT her and any media outlet that publishes her without appropriate condemnation. She should be ignored.
November 26th, 2005 at 12:02 pmThe email link is dead. Here’s what I TRIED to send:
It’s been a long time since Coulter expressed constructive conversation. Her remarks over the last year or so really seem to indicate a drop in popularity. Aside from that, calling anti-Iraq war people “gutless cowards” is flat wrong and contrary to the vast majority of Americans. How long can you keep peddling her stuff as newsworthy or relevant to the country?
November 26th, 2005 at 12:29 pmI still wouldn’t mind alittle one-on-one action with little Ms. Adam’s Apple. I’d show her some progressive freakiness. She’d see the light that dirty little *hore.
November 26th, 2005 at 12:31 pmZwack, you forgot D.
November 26th, 2005 at 12:51 pmBoth was,is and still are Dead Wrong!
The War was Never Justified!
From wikipedia:
“In an interview with David Bowman, Coulter said that Joe McCarthy is the deceased person she admires the most. Coulter claims in Treason that McCarthy was simply misunderstood and unappreciated…”
November 26th, 2005 at 12:58 pmZwack, You are a Fool.
“Be careful, however, that the exercise of your freedom does not become a stumbling block to the weak.†I Corinthians 8:9
This latter one shows that you have freedom, otherwise it could not become a stumbling block.
So, what does any of this have to do with the discussion at hand? Absolutely nothing. If you can’t remain relevant, or at least relevant to a digression then please don’t bother wasting everyone’s time by posting. Of course you are free to do what you want, and I am free to ignore you from now on.
Z.
You stated ” So, what does any of this have to do with the discussion at hand? Absolutely nothing.”
Your FREEDOM HAS Become a Stumbling block to the Weak.
“Be careful, however, that the exercise of your freedom does not become a stumbling block to the weak.†I Corinthians 8:9
November 26th, 2005 at 12:59 pmZwack.
November 26th, 2005 at 1:03 pmSo, in fact, it has Everything to do with with the discussion at hand.
Freedom is Not Free.
#240,
Watch out for Zwack, Just another republican trying to defend Ann and bush.
So, if President Bush does talk about withdrawing the troops from Iraq on Wednesday, does that mean that…
a) Ann Coulter will change her opinion
b) The President is “a gutless traitor†who “longs to see U.S. troops shot, humiliated, and driven from the field of battle.â€
or
c) None of the above, both Ann and the President are right even though they are expressing opposing views…
My bet is that c is the right answer.
Z.
November 26th, 2005 at 1:13 pmWhat I don,t understand is, if, Zwack is so much into defending Ann and Bush, Why is Zwack attacking wwallace?
November 26th, 2005 at 1:16 pmConfucius says “Don,t even try to understand illogic”
Isn’t her fifteen minutes over yet?
November 26th, 2005 at 1:21 pm“As an aside, readers will note that no liberal here has offered a single criticism of Ryan’s deranged comments.” – WmWallace
November 26th, 2005 at 1:29 pm****Weeellll of course not, Wm. They are all from the same mental mode and/or same mental institution. Funny thing is, these are “people” who profess tolerance – but the real political agenda for these envious losers is the acquisition of power. They have no love for our country and are thrilled when service men and women die – because such deaths further their agenda. They come from the 60’s school of thought that their felings are facts. They are to be pitied – and then refuted vigorously! Keep up the good work!
In post 237 JosephW said;
### I guess Annie’s not aware that women ALREADY had the right to vote–they even served in the Iraqi Parliament. Any other consideration would have proved to be a REVERSAL in Iraqi politics. ###
That really is an excellent point. That is one of those pesky little facts Ms Brau….er..Coulter seems to conveniently omit in her reischtag rants.
Prior to we got there and started spreading, what is it were spreading again? Oh yea, “Democracy”. Prior to our going there and spreading democracy, the Iraqi people were doing pretty well on average. Shops and stores were open, electricity was on every day, all day, there was clean water, food, industry, education, the arts. (and yes there were some slums, we’ve got em too). But all in all, Bagdhad looked like any other reasonably normal city.
Now Bagdhad looks like some sort of surreal warscape for a Hollywood movie. Blood, horror, destruction, are a daily occurance, electricity is on about an hour or two before going out, water and food have to be brought in, and NO place is safe in the so called “green zone”.
People were living the lives they were accustomed to, and Saddam, bad as he was, was able to keep order, and control the warring factions.
If right wingers like Frau Coulter don’t like the way he went about it, I guess they should have never put him into power there in the first place.
Yea, I’ll bet the Iraqi people are thrilled at their new found, freedom.
Their all free to die whenever they want to.
November 26th, 2005 at 1:51 pmAs usual Ann Coulter spits her nasty venon on anyone who dares to speak out against the stupid policies of the Bush administration. She has the nerve to attack Mr Murtha from her ivory tower, but she has never served a day in a uniform. She need to shut her pie hole use that pea brain she has too see reality as it really is. Ms Coulter is the most hateful person I have ever had the displeasure to see in my life. That is why she was considered fair game by the nut who attacked her recently.
She has a nasty habit of making her political attacks personal and if she were a man, she’d be getting knocked on her butt alot. I don’t believe in hitting a women, but in her case I can see why someone would want to. It’s one thing to be a republican, but she takes it way too far with her hatred for fellow Americans. Yes, all of you Ann supporters, we democrats are Americans too. And alot of us served in the military unlike Mr Cheney, the Chicken Hawk.
Ann Coulter is another “Chicken Hawk”, who is willing to send other people’s children off to war to die for no good reason. I don’t see “W’s” girls serving their country in Iraq. The day they join the military and serve in Iraq, is the day I will think it’s ok for my child to serve there. Since these republican attack Chicken Hawks are so for war, why don’t they ask their rich children to serve? They won’t do that and I know why too. It’s because their children might get wounded and lose a limb or even worst die. Guest what Ann, your precious children are no better than ours.
Besides I don’t see you taking your skinny A– over to Iraq to fight in a war you are so crazy about. You won’t do it because you are a COWARD and you know it. Shut up or put up Ann, other wise I don’t want to hear another word from you. And for those idiots who may not like my comments, I served 11 years in the Unites States Army. I am a former Infantryman who saw combat and I know what it’s like to get shot at and see your friends get wasted. When I see idiots like Ann speak, it makes me sick to my stomach. I still suffer from nightmares because of my combat experience, but Ann is worst than my dreams.
November 26th, 2005 at 1:59 pmthe trolls polluting this blog are mere pea brained idiots, with absolutely no original thought of their own. Follow their leader and ask no questions – stay the course, even if it leads to HELL. And on the way, slime the “opposition” with their hate filled rhetoric.
November 26th, 2005 at 2:12 pmIn post 251 mighty aphrodite said;
### They have no love for our country and are thrilled when service men and women die – because such deaths further their agenda. They come from the 60’s school of thought that their felings are facts ###
Pinch me, is this Frau Braun, err, I mean Coulter herself? If not, perhaps it is her evil twin or something.
After all, the intellegence level of that post seems about right for Frau Coulter.
The 60’s school of thought we come from says, “make love, not war”. Your right wing, trailer park pious pulpit mentality, the same mentality that has been butchering mankind in the name of Christ for 2000 years, says, “make war, NOT love”.
Your injudicious concern with how others use their own genitalia has pushed out their capability for reason and humantity.
We think our feelings are facts?
Seems to me it’s you guys who think your feelings are facts. Your the ones preaching from the bully pulpit about “he thats not with us, is against us” (quoting Jesus Christ to go to war, nice, I’ll bet Jesus appreciated it), and using emotions and feelings to rally the war cry.
And your own twisted ideals that say we can FORCE people at the barrel of a gun to be good little American puppets.
You think it’s “ok” that we made some mistakes, got some intelligence wrong? You think we can just move on and make lemonade out of this lemon? Were talking about death here. Killing tens of thousands of people and then saying “oops, sorry about that guys”.
The only thing you are spreading in Iraq, is death, blood and horror, and history will label you as the butchers and war criminals that you are.
November 26th, 2005 at 2:13 pmAnd don’t make the mistake of coming back saying we do not support the troops. The troops do what they are ordered to do, by you. The troops will fight, and die, wherever their leaders tell them. The troops are loyal to America. And they expect you in power, to make sure when you send them out to do a job, that you have a dammed good reason for doing it.
The troops are loyal to you, too bad your not loyal to the troops. If you were, you would never send them off to fight for a war that is not crucial to our survival.
Bringing the troops home is the best way to show them our support.
November 26th, 2005 at 2:20 pmPolitics is just the arena Ann chose to whore herself. She’s attention starved. Too bad, she really is sexy and attractive.
November 26th, 2005 at 2:34 pmRemember Ann-
November 26th, 2005 at 2:42 pmWhen they stop listening you’ll always have my ears!
Preferably firmly planted on your inner thighs!
wow….you guys hate coulter, she is a genius and if all ya got are name calling lunatics to attack her then what the hell
November 26th, 2005 at 3:06 pmAnn Coulter is sexy and attractive? Do you perhaps have a thing for scrawny horse-faced she-males with huge adam’s apples? Or is it that she has long blonde hair? I swear, long blonde hair has become synonymous with “sexy and attractive” even if it comes from a bottle and the woman it’s attached to looks like a drag queen.
Myself, I don’t think that Coulter qualifies as female — hell, as human — by even the most generous standards.
November 26th, 2005 at 3:32 pmYea, I’ve got news for you Average TV Viewer , only men can have adams apples, and we’ve all seen Frau Coulter’s.
So I suggest to you Average TV Viewer , that you be “careful” about putting your head between those thighs,
You may find something there that you did not expect…..:)
November 26th, 2005 at 3:41 pmk lo said in post number 260
### wow….you guys hate coulter, she is a genius and if all ya got are name calling lunatics to attack her then what the hell ###
I’m sorry, was that supposed to be some sort of sentence?
If so, what is it’s meaning?
November 26th, 2005 at 3:47 pmwwwwallace is just here to get your panties tied up in knots about ONE issue so you don’t keep your eyes open and learn about all the other criminal issues surfacing about the GOP. wwwallace is just bait to keep you here and not there. Don’t take the bait.
November 26th, 2005 at 4:02 pmWallace will back Bush
Wallace will back Cheney
Wallace will back Rice
Wallace will back Coulter
Wallace will back Brown
Wallace will back Rove
Wallace will back Libby
Wallace will back Ashcroft
Wallace will back Pearle
Wallace will back Wolfowitz
Wallace will back Sharon
Wallace will back Abramoff
Wallace will back NIXON
says enough for me.
November 26th, 2005 at 4:06 pm#253 – “Prior to we got there and started spreading, what is it were spreading again? Oh yea, “Democracyâ€. Prior to our going there and spreading democracy, the Iraqi people were doing pretty well on average. Shops and stores were open, electricity was on every day, all day, there was clean water, food, industry, education, the arts. (and yes there were some slums, we’ve got em too). But all in all, Bagdhad looked like any other reasonably normal city.” – WORTFEUs
November 26th, 2005 at 4:28 pm**** My dear Mr. Wortfeus, I hardly know where to begin discussing you sophmoric “half” argument – but being an optimist, I will. Baghdad WAS a great city – if you did not have a critical thought about Saddam, his “regulations”, his cut-throat sons, his regime, etc. Baghdad was great – if you weren’t a dead Kurd. It was an oasis, if you weren’t an oppressed Shiite. Baghdad was a great city in a great country where 98.4% of voters favoured the incumbant. Boy, I’ll take a cruel dictator ANY day, if I can go and enjoy the thrill of the arts and my kids can read “Ode to Saddam” every day in class! Gee… thinking historically, you must really be sad to have missed out on the trains running on time in Italy and Germany. The SAD truth is so many progs do not value FREEDOM – rather, they value comfort without cost. Your entitlement mentality demonstrates the laziness of most liberals and progressives. As with so many vacuous “thinkers”, your sense of the “immediate” and “self” are pitiful and predictable.
I’m glad you all appreciate the Adams apple image.
Coulter is a hermaphrodite at the very least.
November 26th, 2005 at 4:42 pmSpare me the lazy libreal dribble, sweet lil aphrodite.
If you cared one iota about humane intervention, you would be in countries where it is really needed, like Rawanda, or the Congo. But all they have there is a bunch of poor black people, and we got plenty of those here, right?
And as for Saddams being cruel? No sh#(#t. There are a lot of cruel dictators, some starving millions. But I don’t see you knocking on North Koreas door there, Berlin Betty.
When you want to stand up and demonstrate your toughness with a little humane intervention, where it’s really needed, then give me a call, we can talk.
But until then, you are going to have to do better thant the Captain America to the rescue crap.
November 26th, 2005 at 5:10 pmYou can contact the company that syndicates Coulter’s column, UPS, at lsalem@amuniversal.com.
I did. I thanked them for handling her column and suggested they pay her more money.
November 26th, 2005 at 5:56 pmYea, pay her more money, to stop talking.
November 26th, 2005 at 6:00 pmAnn Coulter’s remarks about Murtha and the Democrats should tell you it’s time for her to go. How ridiculous is it to accuse any American of hating our troops? Really.
Comment by Suzie
What’s the matter girlie? Have you got something against freedom of speech? It’s OK to call George Bush a murdering Nazi but not OK for Coulter to say Democrats hate our troops?
The fact is there is tons of evidence that the Democrats hate our troops. Good on Anne for telling the truth about the commieratbastardmofos that infest the Democratic Party.
November 26th, 2005 at 6:00 pmSend that b***h over to fight in Iraq if she’s so gung ho over this war.
Comment by jillian
Go be a human shield b***h if you don’t like the war.
November 26th, 2005 at 6:01 pmHey I know, we could start a fund. We could all chip in and pay her to not say anything for a year.
Let’s see, I got $6.98 and a buffalo nickel with a hole in it. Whose in?
November 26th, 2005 at 6:02 pmSpare me the lazy libreal dribble, sweet lil aphrodite.
If you cared one iota about humane intervention, you would be in countries where it is really needed, like Rawanda, or the Congo. But all they have there is a bunch of poor black people, and we got plenty of those here, right?
Comment by Warpedisus
Well, run your ass on over there. When they get a religion that demands the entire globe and begin to develope nukes we’ll come see how you’ve been doing.
November 26th, 2005 at 6:10 pmLet Lou Dobbs know what you think about his show used as a sounding board by Ann Coulter, a woman who believes in ethnic cleansing and forced religious conversion and in the silencing of domestic dissent through murder.
http://www.cnn.com/feedback/forms/form5.html?9
-GSD
November 26th, 2005 at 6:14 pmCoulter is vile beyond words.
November 26th, 2005 at 6:15 pmhe fact is there is tons of evidence that the Democrats hate our troops. Good on Anne for telling the truth about the commieratbastardmofos that infest the Democratic Party.
Comment by I-RIgHT-I — November 26, 2005 @ 6:00 pm
I’ll issue the standard challenge to you to document such hatred of our troops in the form of references or links (and I don’t mean a link or two to an isolated crank but lots of them by Democrats), and as usual your comments will end in a whimper because you don’t have any, although I’m sure you’ll slag me for calling you on this. So let me see, I’m a Vietnam vet and a Democrat so I guess I spit on myself when I returned from OS.
November 26th, 2005 at 6:17 pmLet Lou Dobbs know what you think about his show used as a sounding board by Ann Coulter, a woman who believes in ethnic cleansing and forced religious conversion and in the silencing of domestic dissent through murder.
http://www.cnn.com/feedback/forms/form5.html?9
-GSD
Comment by Granite State Destroyer
Yeah, like he cares what you think. ha
November 26th, 2005 at 6:17 pmI-RIgHT-I said ### Well, run your ass on over there. When they get a religion that demands the entire globe and begin to develope nukes we’ll come see how you’ve been doing. ###
Run my ass over there? I ain’t the one running around the globe playing Charlemagne there slappy.
I am of the school of thought, that when you learn to get your own democracy right, then you can go around telling everyone else how to do it.
What was it that long haired radical Jewish dude said? Something about pulling a beam out of our eyes first or something?
November 26th, 2005 at 6:23 pmTakes alot for someone who has never served to sit in her office and call a war veteran gutless and a traitor.
November 26th, 2005 at 6:25 pmDear WORTFEus – You need to catch up – I was for the humanitarian effort in Bosnia, and was very critical that our beloved former President did not help those poor souls in Rwanda. Now, oh obvious One, I guess the fact that there are lots of “cruel dictators” (you think?) justifies leaving Saddam in power. What amazing critical thinking skill you lack. As for North Korea, we HAVE sent tons of food. (Are you in remedial reading classes?)
“Spare me the lazy libreal (sic) dribble, sweet lil aphrodite.” – WORTFEus
****Most liberals, Worty, are the last to show up and the first to leave. But the ones who have made their own independent wealth – what is with them? Guilt – and the need to “feel” so fabulous about themselves? How about this: those elitists should just donate their $$$$ to the charity of their choice – anonymously.
Another fine exampple of human debris is Senator Ted “the Swimmer” Kennedy – or his “junior” Senator, JF Kerry. These “pubic minded” civil servants want to relegate poor inner city kids to awful public schools, but I seem to recall their kids attending expensive private schools. And, newbie, before you start shrieking about $$$ for public schools – I’ve already written a recipe to cure the ills of public ed. – (My apologies for repeating this, but…)
a.) START public school teachers at $80,000.-/ year salaries. (Inner city teachers would START at $100,000.- / year.
b.) NO MORE TENURE – FIRE lousy teachers & quit shifting lousy teachers to poor schools.
c.) Only “A” and “B” students will be accepted into the teaching program. I would lose all the dead weight of the “C” and “D” students.
By the way, you’re Berlin Betty and reich wing stuff is pretty old. (My dear departed Jewish mother fled Austria after they were occupied – so she was not a huge fan of German culture or French collaborative culture.) Get some new material and while you’re at it – perhaps something POSITIVE – your negativity is whiny and pitiful.
November 26th, 2005 at 6:26 pm“You can never have a revolution in order to establish a democracy. You must first have a democracy in order to have a revolution.â€
— Gilbert K. Chesterton
November 26th, 2005 at 6:26 pmAphrodite,
I have no idea where teachers salaries fits in, but ok, whatever gets you up the hill.
As for sending food to Korea, thanks for showing your true colors. YELLOW.
You and your band of not so merry men, are the biggest chickens$#$T cowards I’ve ever seen. Donating food and working for change?
How bout sending in the Marines you big bad republican dominatrix? I mean it. Where’s all your tough talk when your facing a 2 million man army thats NOT running around in rags and shouldering VietNam era weapons?
If you had half the sheballs you claim, you would have had your lil butt on a boat to Bagdhad years ago.
You are the cowards, the big talkers, until you have to face a real army, with real tanks, bombs, planes, and now, with the rise of the Red Giant, a real navy.
You just picked the littlest, most defenseless country that had Arabs in it, and kicked the crap out of it to show the world “our resolve” after 911.
Just admit it. Everyone in the world sees it but you and your deluded minorty.
Our army fighting the Iraqis was like putting Mike Tyson in the ring with Don Knotts.
November 26th, 2005 at 6:35 pmOh and I’ll stop calling you Berlin Betty if you like. How bout BB for short?
November 26th, 2005 at 6:36 pma.) START public school teachers at $80,000.-/ year salaries. (Inner city teachers would START at $100,000.- / year.
Comment by the Goddess
Not fair for the inner city teaches unless you also add combat pay. One more thing. Anyone who wants that job has to actually be able to read and compose a complete sentence. It’s not that way now.
November 26th, 2005 at 6:42 pmWow, you guys are good. Are you two a team?
I am amazed at how smoothly you little propagandists shift the topic away from the war, and onto teachers salaries.
Nice, but we ain’t biting.
November 26th, 2005 at 6:45 pmYou are the cowards, the big talkers, until you have to face a real army, with real tanks, bombs, planes, and now, with the rise of the Red Giant, a real navy.
You just picked the littlest, most defenseless country that had Arabs in it, and kicked the crap out of it to show the world “our resolve†after 911.
Comment by Warped
So you’re not an American are you? Good. Would you like us to take on the Red Chinese? Where are you? Tell me and I’ll tell you how long you’ll have to live after the nuclear cloud starts drifting your way.
November 26th, 2005 at 6:45 pmWow, you guys are good. Are you two a team?
I am amazed at how smoothly you little propagandists shift the topic away from the war, and onto teachers salaries.
Nice, but we ain’t biting.
Comment by WORFEUS
Every once in awhile I crave the attention of an adult female. What’s your problem?
November 26th, 2005 at 6:51 pmWhere did you get the idea I wasn’t an American?
Maybe it’s because I didn’t sign my post “heil Busch”?
I am an American you putz.
And thanks for just admitting your chickenshit strategy. You said ### you like us to take on the Red Chinese? Where are you? Tell me and I’ll tell you how long you’ll have to live after the nuclear cloud starts drifting your way ###
You have just made it clear that you only pick fights with little guys who can’t fight back, which if you could read, you would understand that’s been my point all along. Don’t talk tough about beating up someone who can’t defend themselves. And if your gonna start freeing people from Dictators, you might want to start with the big boys. Kick there ass, and you won’t have to worry about the little ones.
And if you can’t do that, then maybe you’d better start learning to listen to that guy you call your savior, and start learning to get along with your neighbors.
What’s that the good book says? “He who lives by the sword will prosper?” Is that it? Oh no, that’s wrong, it was “he who lives by the sword, shall DIE by the sword”. Gee…, thats pretty depressing. Oh well, what does the bible know anyway.
And and by the way, your chickenshit plan to attack the defensless and “talk” with those who can defend themselves, has just convinced every little country out there, that the way to avoid US bombs is to possess Nuclear Weapons.
Way to go.
November 26th, 2005 at 6:54 pmRyan bin Ladin shows his true colors: “…part jew…That explains your attitude and culture…”
November 26th, 2005 at 6:55 pmLiberals used to routinely call Vietnam veterans like Murtha all sorts of vile names, like “baby killer.” Since when are liberals against calling US troops names?
November 26th, 2005 at 6:56 pmWell that makes sense Ryan Neat. It also shows the “blessings” religion just keeps on bringing us.
Religion, the gift that keeps on giving, or taking, depending on which side your on.
“The purpose of separation of church and state is to keep forever from these shores the ceaseless strife that has soaked the soil of Europe with blood for centuries”
President James Madison
November 26th, 2005 at 6:58 pmCan someone link me to some nude Coulter picks? Or at least some good photoshop pics?
-Thanks in advance
November 26th, 2005 at 6:59 pmWallace, talk about showing your true colors? You called Ryan a Jew, as if that were a derogatory comment?
Perhaps you will like Ryan better if you could get him into one of your concentration kamps, you nazi prick.
November 26th, 2005 at 6:59 pmIt’s an old trick– put a blonde in heels and your politics will sale.
Why do you think communism fell?
Think of it this way– she’s all they could conjure. I remember reading a statement she made in which she boasted of her promiscuousness. The thought of it made me impotent for weeks.
November 26th, 2005 at 7:00 pmAll I’ve to say is, which is more of an illusion: power or powerlessness?
November 26th, 2005 at 7:01 pmLiberals used to routinely call Vietnam veterans like Murtha all sorts of vile names, like “baby killer.” Since when are liberals against calling US troops names?
Comment by wwallace — November 26, 2005 @ 6:56 pm
Besides this comment being irrelevant to this thread and inane in itself -I think most of us were too young back then to be able to participate in any mature debate on the Vietnam war…
November 26th, 2005 at 7:26 pm#298, “You called Ryan a Jew”
Uh, no I didn’t you illiterate. :()
November 26th, 2005 at 7:27 pmGregor, who died and left you in charge of deciding what is relevant? :()
When liberals complain about a Vietnam vet being called names, it’s entirely relevant to ask when they changed their minds.
November 26th, 2005 at 7:29 pmWORFEUS, #296: “Well that makes sense Ryan Neat. It also shows the “blessings†religion just keeps on bringing us.”
No doubt WORFEUS would like to fire up the ovens again.
November 26th, 2005 at 7:32 pmI predict Ryan will continue to speww worthless bile and anti-semitic hatred.
November 26th, 2005 at 8:12 pmMy dear Warface – “I am amazed at how smoothly you little propagandists shift the topic away from the war, and onto teachers salaries.
Nice, but we ain’t biting.
Comment by WARFACE — November 26, 2005 @ 6:45 pm”
***** Not only did you bite – but you chewed and swallowed. Weren’t you the one who mentioned how much better Saddam ’s Baghdad was, and about having poor black people here as well as Rwanda – silly me??? You’re are all over the board – do you suffer from ADHD?
As for contributing militarily, I have. My brother is an active duty Navy fighter pilot. I suspect the only contribution you make to the United States – notice how I didn’t insult you and say “our country” – is the $4.98 you pay in taxes and your “gimme more” vote.
I-RIGHT-I – You mean teachers should ACTUALLY have to read AND write???? That sounds mentally strenuous to me!! Notice how the intellectual giants here make all kinds of excuses so as to retain crappy teachers? But I guess if those poor kids became well-educated and got good-paying jobs, they might not NEED the progs and pessimists selling them into perpetual victimhood. Crappy teachers = modern slavery.
November 26th, 2005 at 8:13 pm“And it’s my view that the President got it right both times, that it would have been a mistake for us to get bogged down in the quagmire inside Iraq.â€
November 26th, 2005 at 8:16 pmDick Cheney, April 29, 1991- RyANNE”
***** And this is relevant TODAY?? Your arguments are parallel – but you mever quite make the connection.
aphrodite,
If all you have now is to attack me with personal bs, then I guess you are done on the issues.
If you actually go back and READ my posts, you will find I normally stay pretty close to the issues, which are the war in Iraq, why we should not be there, why we should be standing up to real terrorism, and how to get out of Iraq.
I would go back and reference all of my posts for you, but I ain’t your babysitter. If you can’t keep up it’s not my problem.
November 26th, 2005 at 8:25 pmAnd I did NOT bite on the teachers. You won’t find ONE post of mine that talks about the teachers. Not ONE.
You seem to share a fondness with lies, much like the right winged scum you so vehemently support.
November 26th, 2005 at 8:27 pm“An anti-semitic american liberal? That’s one of the most HYSTERICAL claims I’ve ever heard a republican fool make!
November 26th, 2005 at 8:30 pmBAHAHAHAHA ” – RyANNE-
**** I guess you HAVE missed all of the war protests!!! Int’l ANSWER, NION and other sundry groups are always shrieking about anti-Zionists, Sharon = Hitler, etc. – just like you. (Here’s a tip: when someone mentions “occupied territories” we know they view the victory of the Israeli’s (after being attacked) as illegitimate.
Overheard at a trendy, elite party/fund raiser:
Liberal to Prog: “Now if those greedy Jews would have just died instead of beating the poor Islamofascists we wouldn’t have to bother with so much tension in the Middle-East. You know, it’sthe pro-Israel policy of the US which has the Arabs’s burka in a twist.BTW, WHAT is SO unreasonable about Saddam paying suicide bomber families or Iran wanting Israel annihilated?? Those poor mis-understood Arabs….”
Let”s see now. It’s time for irite, ww, and mity to post their war records. By the way, how old are you three clowns? I can’t figure out where the adults are. I just pray they’re not reproducing any more like you. I know the horrors of war firsthand and those who have do not celebrate it like a reality show as you chickenhawk typists, nor do we strut it around like this priveleged son who occupies the White House. None of you are interesting or clever. Please grow up soon and not be a waste of skin anymore.
November 26th, 2005 at 8:34 pmRyANNie – “Besides, your family wasted its money on a ‘private’ education that has clearly made you retarded both in social graces and intellectual skills. Your family was robbed!”
November 26th, 2005 at 8:53 pm****Another nonsensical parallel “argument” – my family was not and is not in the Senate (or packing the school boards) to dictate to others that they are not deserving of a school choice – and hypocritically “enrolling” children in a private school. Good thing you’re rich (probably a trust fund baby) because you couldn’t get or keep a job in private industry. But you were a dedicated “Civil Servant” weren’t you. Hmmmmm…. Figures. Good night.
The thing I always found funny was the broad use of the term Semite. Semite refers to descendants of Shem or Semetic speaking people.
Here:
A member of a group of Semitic-speaking peoples of the Near East and northern Africa, including the Arabs, Arameans, Babylonians, Carthaginians, Ethiopians, Hebrews, and Phoenicians.
So, an Anti-Semtic Arab is an oxymoron. Can’t happen. Also, anybody that doesn’t like Arabs is Anti-Semtic.
November 26th, 2005 at 9:03 pmWhy are Ryan’s comments about Jews identical to the average al Qaeda member’s comments about Jews? Just asking. :()
November 26th, 2005 at 9:27 pmShe’s just a patsy propagandist.
November 26th, 2005 at 9:28 pm#326,
Any comment on the thread, or are you too busy making personal attacks.
November 26th, 2005 at 9:30 pmIf you feel Ryan’s personal attacking is wrong, why would you join in?
Right wingers,
You’re buttons are being pressed by the Liberals here. Do you have comments about Ann Coulter? Do you agree with her or not, do you partially agree, what’s up with you view of her? Even you folks must feel she is a little radical.
November 26th, 2005 at 9:32 pmOkay, let’s not feed the trolls anymore, shall we? I challenged I-RIgHT-I to produce any proof (links, articles, statements by party leaders, etc.) that Democrats hate the troops and as usual for a troll he failed to do it. Notice also that the other two trolls haven’t exactly jumped to his defense either. They bring nothing but spite and ignorance here and we’ve got better things to talk about. Actually, we have things to talk about, unlike the mental and emotional circle-jerkers on the right wing where these losers properly belong, and we should be focusing on that. They have nothing to add to mature, adult discourse and they prove it over and over. Responding to their nonsense just feeds their pathological need for attention, take it away and they’ll sulk off back to Freeperland where Saddam Hussein had nuclear weapons and exchanged back rubs with Osama while they planned 9/11.
Can we stop giving them air now?
November 26th, 2005 at 9:45 pmThis sounds like Ryan and many others on the left today:
http://memritv.org/Transcript.asp?P1=938
Maybe ThinkGoebbels should fire Judd and hire Duke.
November 26th, 2005 at 9:49 pmCoulter is just an average, ordinary slut who has gone to a new medium. Most sluts are content to whore it up at the office or in the class room. Coulter tries to take it to the papers.
What’s odd is she actually does appeal to the very far right. The kinds of people who religiously listen to Rush, and their kind. I have friends who absolutely drool over her. I don’t get it. I try to point them to better looking chicks, but it’s no use. Brainwashed.
Just like Jane from Saturday night, she’s an “ignorant slut”. Should be treated as such. Pittied more than hated.
November 27th, 2005 at 12:21 amMore news from Iraq.
This is what former Iraqi Prime Minister Ayad Allawi said during an interview with The Observer:
“‘We are hearing about secret police, secret bunkers where people are being interrogated,’ he added. ‘A lot of Iraqis are being tortured or killed in the course of interrogations. We are even witnessing Sharia courts based on Islamic law that are trying people and executing them.’ ”
Another excerpt:
“Responding to the former prime minister’s comments, Sir Menzies Campbell, the Lib Dem foreign affairs spokesman, said: ‘It is inconceivable in the higher reaches of the command of the multinational forces that there was not an awareness of what is being done by some Iraqis to their own countrymen.’ ”
Abuse worse than under Saddam, says Iraqi leader
November 27th, 2005 at 2:10 amhttp://observer.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,6903,1651789,00.html
Bill O’Reilly has one of the top rated shows on cable news, you delusional freak. Comment by wwallace
BOR gets about 2.5 million a night. CBS Evening News, the lowest rated of the 3 majors, gets 6.25 million.
Do the math.
November 27th, 2005 at 5:14 amIt’s chic to bash Israel, wwallace. They played the “sky is falling” schtick for so long that everyday Americans noticed they don’t give a shit about Israel. I’ll bet most Americans can’t find Israel on a map. Hmmm…
Back to ol’ girl. Did anyone ever find some nudes of Coulter for me?
November 27th, 2005 at 9:34 amRight wingers,
You’re buttons are being pressed by the Liberals here. Do you have comments about Ann Coulter? Do you agree with her or not, do you partially agree, what’s up with you view of her? Even you folks must feel she is a little radical.
Comment by For Truth
Just the opposite, we’re pressing the buttons. Why do you think it’s so much fun? Do I agree with Coulter about Murtha? Not exactly. I don’t think Murtha actually hates the troops but his actions amount to the same thing. Murtha’s an old fool writing a book and playing to the peanut gallery. Kennedy, Clinton and some others though, oh yeah, they hate the troops and the troops hate them.
“Kill all their leaders and convert the rest to Christianity”. That’s probably one of my favorite Coulter quotes. It’s so funny and yet such a good idea too.
November 27th, 2005 at 10:18 amOkay, let’s not feed the trolls anymore, shall we? I challenged I-RIgHT-I to produce any proof (links, articles, statements by party leaders, etc.) that Democrats hate the troops and as usual for a troll he failed to do it.
Comment by Throatwarbler Mangrove
Do I know you? I don’t think so. You want ME to provide proof that the Donks hate the troops? Isn’t it enough proof to hear the things they say about Bush, the Commander and Chief? About the war in general? About lies? The Democrats are only interested in the USA losing the fight in the Middle East and they don’t care how many troops we lose as long as the terrorists “run the USA out of town”.
Show me something they’ve done to support the war effort thus supporting the troops besides voting to send them in the first place? You can’t do it because the Democrats hate Bush, hate America and by extension hate our men and women in the service.
November 27th, 2005 at 10:25 amComments like:
“Kill all their leaders and convert the rest to Christianityâ€
Hurt America. This is why you’ll be cast out, IRI.
November 27th, 2005 at 10:28 amThe Bush administration is going out of it’s way to propagate pro-war opinions expressed by soldiers. Bush is, “by extension”, dragging the military into his unpopularity.
November 27th, 2005 at 10:32 amRepublican Extremes
Here’s a quick litmus test for my Republican friends out there (yes, I do have a few). Are you a moderate or an extremist? Moderate Douglas MacKinnon, press secretary to former Sen. Bob Dole, and former White House and Pentagon
November 27th, 2005 at 10:34 amAnother kind of war protestor….YIKES!!!
The leader of Iraq’s most powerful political party has called on the United States to let Iraqi fighters take a more aggressive role against insurgents, saying his country will only be able to defeat the insurgency when the United States lets Iraqis get tough.
“The more freedom given to Iraqis, the more chance for further progress there would be, particularly in fighting terror,” said Abdul Aziz Hakim, head of the Supreme Council for the Islamic Revolution in Iraq, the Shiite Muslim religious party that leads the transitional government and whose armed wing is the most feared of Iraq’s many factional forces.
Instead, Hakim asserted in a rare interview late last week, the United States is tying Iraq’s hands in the fight against insurgents. One of Iraq’s “biggest problems is the mistaken or wrong policies practiced by the Americans,” he said.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/11/26/AR2005112601211.html
Now, let’s be clear. This is one of the real leaders of Iraq and he’s telling us to get out of the way and let them do what needs to be done to clean out the Sunni Triangle and the Sunni insurgents coming in from Syria and Iran. I think he’s tired of his mosques, grade schools and weddings being bombed and his people killed. The good thing is when he gets his chance (and he will) there won’t be any peace/love/dove Leftwing Loser Democrats around crying about abuse and atrocities committed against the terrorists and tying the hands of the military. Why? Because he’ll kill all the whiners he can and deport the rest. There will be no more Democrats visiting Iraq. So who do you think really wants to cut troops and hand over more responsibility to the Iraqis? Bush or Murtha and the Donks?
November 27th, 2005 at 10:47 amDid you notice?
Did you notice the oftentimes fence-sitting Tim Russert threw the entire Bush administration under the bus today?
Did you notice that Warner and all the guests could only grimace and nod?
Your days are numbered, IRI.
November 27th, 2005 at 10:51 amDid you notice?
Did you notice the oftentimes fence-sitting Tim Russert threw the entire Bush administration under the bus today?
Did you notice that Warner and all the guests could only grimace and nod?
Your days are numbered, IRI.
Comment by Average TV Viewer
Who is Tim Russert that anything he says should bother and American with a brain? I know who signs his check.
November 27th, 2005 at 10:57 amAs someone who has done it, let me be the first to say that it’s darn fun to rewrite history. Y’all should try it sometime.
Vote,
November 27th, 2005 at 1:45 pmPresident Gore
“Who is Tim Russert that anything he says should bother and American with a brain? I know who signs his check.”
Ummmm, he is one of you. We’re not gonna take him. He is watched by conservatives. Oh that’s right, you are not a conservative. You are a NeoCon Nazi. My mistake, sorry.
November 27th, 2005 at 1:50 pmBreaking News!
Ann Coulter said to have ties to Elohim City!
http://www.adl.org/learn/ext_us/Elohim.asp?xpicked=3&item=13
November 27th, 2005 at 5:38 pmWho said? If we can validate the source, we can get this message out.
November 27th, 2005 at 6:38 pmFirst of all, I would like to say that thankfully I don’t watch TV too much to see this kind of nonsense. Plus, there is nothing really that good on.
Second of all, I would like to ask Mighty Aphrodite a couple of questions:
In #266, you said, and I quote, “…the SAD truth is so many progs do not value FREEDOM- rather, they value comfort without cost.” Apparently most of AMERICA, both of the left and the right (and in the middle), value comfort over cost as well. What sacrifices have the majority of Americans made for this war? Where are the victory gardens, the collection of metal and tin, the gas rationings? Why haven’t women been giving up their panty hose to make nylon parachutes? Americans value the comfort of OIL over cost. Every single one of us (and when I mean “us”, I include myself here) is guilty of it. People look pretty comfortable to me- one would never know a war was going on.
In #312, you said that you have contributed to the military because, and again I quote, “My brother is an active duty Navy pilot”. Exactly. YOUR BROTHER is active duty military…NOT YOU. That’s like when I hear people say, “Well my brother went to Iraq, so I know what it’s like”. NO YOU DON’T. Don’t try and pass off someone else’s experiences and knowledge as your own, unless you’ve gone to Iraq or Afghanistan.
Just for the record, becuase I KNOW somebody is gonna accuse me of “hating the troops”, I just left the U.S Army after 5 years of service and a tour of Iraq that only ended in February of this year. I was assigned to Bravo Company, 701st MSB, 1st Infantry Division, based out of Kitzingen, Germany, and spent a year on Forward Operating Base Speicher, which is just outside of Tikrit. Anybody feel like calling me a “coward”? Bring it.
November 27th, 2005 at 6:50 pmIn above, caps have been used for emphasis, not for shouting. Thanks.
November 27th, 2005 at 6:53 pm#353 I would like to thank you for your service.
I have a few questions for you. Are you going to run for congress? Do you believe this war was justify or not? Please give us your opinion on this. Thank You.
November 27th, 2005 at 7:22 pmFreedom is Loose, therefore, FREEDOM is SATAN!
November 27th, 2005 at 9:06 pmRead your Hate!
“Bring it on…” George W. Bush
Hmmm…wasn’t Bush taunting the insurgents?
“Democrats like Murtha are encouraging the Iraqi insurgents when they say the war is going badly” Coulter
At least the Dems are facing reality.
November 28th, 2005 at 12:32 amYes, the dems are facing reality! Which explains the foaming at the mouth Murtha denouncing the progress of our troops who are risking their asses getting shot off. Dems in ‘08! They’re the party of the people…mainly the Baathist people but who’s counting?
November 28th, 2005 at 1:56 amDo I know you? I don’t think so. You want ME to provide proof that the Donks hate the troops? Isn’t it enough proof to hear the things they say about Bush, the Commander and Chief? About the war in general? About lies? The Democrats are only interested in the USA losing the fight in the Middle East and they don’t care how many troops we lose as long as the terrorists “run the USA out of townâ€.
Show me something they’ve done to support the war effort thus supporting the troops besides voting to send them in the first place? You can’t do it because the Democrats hate Bush, hate America and by extension hate our men and women in the service.
Comment by I-RIgHT-I — November 27, 2005 @ 10:25 am Actually no, it’s not enough proof. All you’ve done is parrot what you’ve heard from Annie and the other professional haters. You’re the one accusing Democrats of hating the troops and you have yet to provide any objective proof of it, save to assert that because we rightfully think that Bush was full of s**t when he said that Iraq was a threat and want to hold him to account on it that we also somehow hate America and by extension, somehow hate the troops. That’s some pretty big leaps, and “somehow” isn’t an acceptable standard, give me just one Democrat quoted as saying that they hate America and the troops. Just one.
No, we don’t hate America, we hate what’s being done to it by people who think as you do. And we don’t hate the troops, we hate what’s being done to them by an administration that sent them to fight in a war not worthy of their sacrifices. And we want the lies that are killing them to stop.
So I’m done with you, slag me as you like ’cause that’s really all you have, but coming from you it’s more of a compliment because it shows how much you fear us.
November 28th, 2005 at 2:11 amAnybody feel like calling me a “coward� Bring it.
Comment by helloimhere — November 27, 2005 @ 6:50 pm
Kick it, helloimhere! Btw, any other “America and troop hating” vets here? I served with the 1/7 1stCavDiv in VN in 1970. As I said before, I guess I should have spit on myself when I came back home. Any of you trolls vets?
November 28th, 2005 at 2:18 amRyan- It took me a while to respond because you hurt my feelings and I was in the bathroom crying my little retarded eyes out…but I’m better now, thanks for asking….
As for the Baathist hypocrisy-
#1 None of those guys look like they’ve ever gone near a bath tub, which makes them liars! Baathists lied, the bath tub dried!
#2 I’m southern baathist and have NEVER seen these guys at church! Baathists lied, from church they hide!
#3 If they are reichwingers, then we need to send Joe Wilson in there to have tea with Zarqawi and find out why he prefers white cake over yellow cake.
Answers, mi compadre….we need answers! (does anyone have a tissue….)
November 28th, 2005 at 7:18 am#353 HelloHero – Thank you for your service. Either you’re new here or acting like it. I spent 12 years in the military as did my husband. You, in turn, are welcome. Bring what?? Where????
November 28th, 2005 at 3:01 pmAnnie, why don’t you get your gun and show the gutless “liberals” what you mean by patriotism?
November 28th, 2005 at 3:04 pmDan – been there – done that! You’re welcome!
November 28th, 2005 at 7:00 pmPlease don’t thank me for my service. I did what I had to do and that’s that. And for that reason, I won’t thank you, either. I volunteered (before Bush got elected, mind you, but I assumed the risks anyway). Who you should really thank are the guys who got drafted (WWII, Vietnam)- they didn’t have a choice, and they got treated like crap when they got home.
355. To answer your questions:
I have no plans on running for Congress. To do so used to be an honorable thing, but now it seems that politicians, both Republicans and Democrats, have lowered the position to that of a used-car salesman (no offense to used-car salesmen out there). People on both sides of the political spectrum blindly follow whoever it is that they think can help make their own star shine brighter- they don’t question, and they don’t think for themselves. They need to ask themselves if what they are doing and what they are voting on is what is best for not only their constituents, but Americans in general as well, which leads me to the next question…
Do I think the war with Iraq is justified….
Afghanistan? Yes. Iraq? No. The war with Iraq detracted from the original mission, which was outsting al-Queda and the Taliban in Afghanistan for retribution for 9/11, and to find Osama bin Laden. Osama bin Laden still has not been found…neither dead nor alive. It has already been shown that there were no Saddam Hussein/bin Laden links, which should come as no surprise because Hussein is a secularist, and bin Laden is a radical Islamist. It’d be like Elton John and Pat Robertson joining forces (although stranger bedfellows have occured). No weapons of mass destruction have been found, unless you call the massive amounts of pigeon poo found in the bunker where you stored your extra ammunition WMD…..then, heck yeah, they had a ton of it! (I’m convinced I’m gonna get a disease from that stuff down the road….yuck!).
As for the “coward” part:
I’ve noticed that there are people (Rep. Schmidt from Ohio being one of them) who call vets that question or contradict the Administraton’s stance on this war, “cowards”, or other things- traitors, losers, or worse. I, for one, do not agree with anything this administration says or does concerning this war. So I guess this makes me a “coward”. I’m pretty sure, eventually, someone would have called me that, just because they wouldn’t have had anything intelligent to say.
Now, yes, I am a newbie to the site (thanks for noticing). TV stinks, and I get tired of people my age-
20 and 30 year olds- caring more about what greasy Britney Spears’ baby looks like (insulting mommy, not baby) than what’s really going on in the world. It makes me sick. I’ve lived out of the country for 3 years, and I am in reverse culture-shock, because the America I left is not the same America I came home to. Figured a little discourse in society and politics might cheer me up.
That being said, I have noticed (by reading all of the posts) that there are a few people here who, when they are asked a question/or questions, never really answer them. They either avoid answering completely, or give answers that are really just opinions, but try to pass those opinions off as truth/fact. Answer with legitimate facts, please. If not, you insult my intelligence and highlight your lack of it.
Look forward to further debate and any questions you guys might have about Iraq…like how hot it was…LOL..
November 28th, 2005 at 7:54 pmOne thing I’ve never quite understood about the right-wingers calling people who have served during armed conflict (or for that matter those that have actually served in any capacity) cowards when they have mostly never served anything but themselves.
People in the armed forces cannot pick and choose their battles. They must go where and when they are ordered to go. It doesn’t matter who’s president, democrat or republican. You don’t have democratic service people only going to war if it’s a democratic president or only republican service people going if it’s a republican president. Yes, there is a segment that always gets excited about being deployed to a warzone, but I believe they are actually the minority. Once they arrive and become witness to the carnage and utter brutality of war most I believe are abruptly awakened to the very reality of it. The only people I would ever call cowards are the very ones that have never served (wartime or not) that so easily call those that have cowards simply because they want to understand clearly what their objective is during a war. Anyone that wears the uniform of their respective branch deserves that as much as anything. The troops deserve the truth. Having to kill at the behest of others is bad enough to have to live with should one survive a war, but doing so without a clear and concise objective is, to me, tantamount to having them fight and die for something other than protecting our nation.
When the Bush Administration sent our armed forces to war in Iraq it was initially deemed necessary to ward off an imminent attack by Saddam Hussein and his weapons of mass destruction. Once we got there and none were found the justification quickly changed to removing a terrible dictator. Then about liberating the Iraqi people. Then about the mass graves. Then about spreading democracy in the middle east. Then about fighting the terrorists over there so we don’t have to fight them here. Which one is it? The ones that need and deserve to be told first and foremost are the troops.
What Ann Coulter and Jean Schmidt and others like them don’t understand about war is the fact that they’ve never been in one. Anyone that has served in this country’s armed forces honorably (especially during wartime) has every right before all others to critique it and demand what the strategy is for it. “Stay the course” is not a strategy. You need a plan for the course, a beginninng, the duration and an end. War is not a game. It is about death. Killing and maiming and being killed and maimed. It’s not a festive atmosphere like a football game. Now if another country actually came over here and tried to take over and tried to force us to toss all of our ideals and personal lifestyles and freedoms I firmly believe that most all Americans would raid the gun shops and Wal-Marts and vigorously defend this nation and destroy anyone that tried such a ridiculous thing.
Those that treat this war in Iraq like some sort of esteem building device and want it to continue without any real detailed strategy are nothing more than cheerleaders for George Bush and the PNAC neocon agenda. It’s easy for all of those who’ve never been in the shit, so to speak, to talk the talk. But until you’ve actually walked the walk, how in the hell can anyone, in good conscience, call decorated service men or women, cowards.
November 28th, 2005 at 10:59 pmIn Anne’s bizzarro world:
Murtha is a traitor for saying with should leave iraq and let the iranian mullahs spill their own blood to take it over instead of using ours.
Karl Rove, on the other hand, is NOT a traitor for leaking the name of a CIA agent during “wartime” (which is from now to armageddon according to these douchebags).
Does she even posseses the capacity to understand how irreconcilable these two ideas are?
Has anyone heard Ann utter a word about the CIA leak case? Or is exercising your 1st amendment rights just more a crime than blowing the cover of government agent..
November 29th, 2005 at 7:45 amMr. Evil, I could kiss you ;)
November 29th, 2005 at 6:26 pm“Thank you for your service. Either you’re new here or acting like it. I spent 12 years in the military as did my husband. You, in turn, are welcome. Bring what?? Where????
Comment by mighty aphrodite”
A JAG is not military service. My civil service was more of a military service than that. Military service is when you carry a gun, and you actually are a soldier. You guys played dress up and haggled over the military code.
Wah, Wah, Wah…
Not the same there MizzMoron
And besides, Did you receive a scholarship through the military for college? That’s a form of ‘welfare’ you know for the underpriveleged. You always claim you’re against welfare and liberal ideas. But here you are, most likely pity case equal opportunity charity for the military. And a WOMAN who wouldn’t have even been able to be a jag without the efforts of liberals.
You live in a fabricated fantasy world there you STUPID COW!
November 30th, 2005 at 7:05 pmSo, wait, Mighty Aphrodite….what role did you play in the military? Did you go to basic training, West Point, ROTC, etc? Not quite sure what you did in the military.
November 30th, 2005 at 7:34 pmIt gets worse. In her latest column she tries to “Swift Boat” him, implying that his medals were fraudulent.
http://www.anncoulter.org/cgi-local/welcome.cgi
It had to happen. I’m just annoyed with her that she posted her column yesterday, because I had two dozen donuts on Friday in the pool to guess when someone would “Swift-boat” Murtha.
December 1st, 2005 at 5:47 pmI just feel sad for her. As frustrating as Ann Coulter can be, can you imagine how much you have to hate yourself in order to have that much hate for others? For instance, she has made comments about the role of women in society (meaning that she believes they should basically stay at home). She seems to hate herself for being a woman, and aspires to be more important than what she believes a woman should be. She hates herself for not being a man, but also hates herself for not being willing to accept being a woman. Because of this, she has allied herself with the bullies of the far right politically, people who for a short time will make her feel good about herself because she makes them happy by saying the things that even they may find too repugnant to say. (Just look at how her eyes light up whenever O’Reilly or HAnnity agrees with her or just seems happy with her comments — her eyes scream “I got you to like me”). Bullies are always lashing out at others to make themselves feel better in their skin — this is the very nature of the Neo-Cons in general. Coulter represents this disrespect for all other viewpoints and adds the personal self-hatred as her self-righteous trump card. She is a woman so pathetic that she would be worthy of pity if she werent so hateful.
December 4th, 2005 at 1:05 amTorn- Disagreement is hate? Only in lefty America!
December 4th, 2005 at 11:48 pmMarco –
That isnt what I wrote, though I very much enjoy the Hannity / Limbaugh cherry-picking spin you put on it. I said that the woman hates herself and cited some examples of why I believe this to be true. If I am wrong about hating herself, so be it, but she certainly is filled with hatred at liberals. Look at the quotes and that have been attributed to her — liberals should be shot; Timothy McVeigh should have parked in front of the NY Times; etc. Not even Rush Limbaugh goes to the extremes that this woman does. She has some MAJOR issues — it appears to me to be hate. Hate, more often than not, comes from somewhere down deep.
As for disagreement, I think disagreement is a fantastic thing when minds can come together and discuss issues. THis is not Coulter’s way. She rarely actually argues a point, and, instead, says incendiary things to people with huge and irrational generalizations. SHe does use arguments in her writing, but, as with any writer, presents her side unimpeded by those who might disagree with what she has to say (which, I will offer, could be said of liberal writers). IT is in her books that, whereas I disagree with many things she has to say, at least there is an element of thought. When she is in an interview situation and she gets herself into a place where she might actually have to defend her point with logic or facts, she gets “deer in the headlights” eyes and makes hateful comments.
So, no, disagreement is not hate — I never said that. I said that her hate fuels her vitriolic disagreement.
However, I find it interesting that you would indicate that you believe disagreement is not hate (by saying that only in “liberal AMerica” would disagreement equal hate), especially considering that most right-wingers (to be fair, right-wingers as represented by the likes of Rush and Hannity and O’Reilly) believe that disagreement with conservative views and / or the President’s equals hate. So, if I understand the sentiment, disagreement with liberals isnt hate at all, but disagreement with conservatives is?
Very enlightening.
Tom
December 18th, 2005 at 10:22 pmT-Mobile Ringtones
T-Mobile Ringtones
December 23rd, 2005 at 4:13 pmsuv
suv
December 27th, 2005 at 12:26 pmconstructor?Anselm:transformed manned Newsweek spinners?… Thanks!!!
December 28th, 2005 at 8:33 pmcompatibilities politer suffers paying?Puccini – Tons of interesdting stuff!!!
December 29th, 2005 at 5:29 pmwedding ring
wedding rings
January 1st, 2006 at 1:12 pmFree Texas Hold Um…
Do I spell it right? Free Texas Hold Um…
January 8th, 2006 at 12:49 pmpreside attainments abstracting endemic anytime civilly Peloponnese adoptions
January 8th, 2006 at 5:15 pmfree cell phone ringtones…
Let it ring: Cell Phone Ringtones…
January 9th, 2006 at 12:47 pmscrupulous parallelism poisoned explosion Aeneas beneficiaries
January 10th, 2006 at 11:23 pmIt’s funny how you morons, and by that I mean the Liberal left, think you know more than Ann Coulter. I would love to watch you try to win an argument with her….because you’d lose. At least she stands up for what she beleives instead of following idiots like Pelosi around like sheep. So get a life, and a brain. Or possibly, go hug a terrorist…that would be interesting.
November 22nd, 2006 at 12:44 pm