O’Reilly Finally Unveils Enemies List
After sites like Media Matters and ThinkProgress exposed his callous remarks about San Francisco, Bill O’Reilly said:
I’m glad the smear sites made a big deal out of it. Now we can all know who was with the anti-military internet crowd. We’ll post the names of all who support the smear merchants on billoreilly.com.
Here’s the list which debuted yesterday:
(Click here for the full image.)
O’Reilly provides no information about what, specifically, these news organizations actually did to earn their spots. But O’Reilly never lets facts get in the way of his outrage.
Sort Comments By: Top Rated | Date
Talk about hypocracy…if a liar lists “liars,” what do we make of the list??!!??
November 29th, 2005 at 5:08 pmWhat an unbelievable tool.
November 29th, 2005 at 5:09 pmC’mon, O’Lielly! I practically begged you to put me on your Enemies List. What do I have to do? Wish you “Happy Holidays” to your face? What a pinhead!
November 29th, 2005 at 5:11 pmWhere’s my name?
November 29th, 2005 at 5:11 pmHis ratings must be terrible.
November 29th, 2005 at 5:12 pmI want to be on the list. Please bill, you lying sack of dog shit, what do I have to do to get on your enemies list!
November 29th, 2005 at 5:12 pmI’m pretty sure MSNBC made the list because of Keith Olbermann’s hard work on Countdown. Oh, how I miss the clock ticking down to the BO story…
November 29th, 2005 at 5:12 pmSpelling note: callous
November 29th, 2005 at 5:13 pmWhat do I have to do to appear as an entity in my own right? I’m there…..
November 29th, 2005 at 5:13 pmBill O’liely can take his list and shuve it up his cornhole.
November 29th, 2005 at 5:14 pmI’m sorry, but I can’t click on the O’Reilly link. My puke bucket is in the other room.
November 29th, 2005 at 5:14 pm#6 & #9 - Arianna Huffington had a thing where you could send her your name and she’d take the list to him personally, but I’m not finding it now.
November 29th, 2005 at 5:15 pmHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! HAHAHAHAHAHHAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAH!
Ah, Bill O’Rielly, you’re just too much.
November 29th, 2005 at 5:16 pmWhat the hell. Think Progress does not make the cut? Come on Bill!! Put down the Falafel!
November 29th, 2005 at 5:17 pmI’m surprised Media Matters and Think Progress aren’t on the list.
November 29th, 2005 at 5:17 pmI can’t view any more than three — is that all he’s got?
November 29th, 2005 at 5:17 pmIf distributing “defamation and false information” is his criterion, where are The Cato Institute, The Heritage Foundation, The Hudson Institute, The Scaife Foundation, The Bradley Foundation, The Olin Foundation, The Weekly Standard (thank you Bill Kristol and your Iraq-invading buddies), Fox “News” Channel, and The New York Post? Oh, yeah. That last two are owned by his boss, Rupert Murdoch.
And why not name the “far left websites” to which he refers? Is he thinking of something other than Media Matters for America (www.mediamatters.org) and ThinkProgress (two outstanding websites)?
I hate to say it, but I think O’Lielly is too much of a coward to face his “enemies.”
Okay, I lied. I loved saying it. What a jerk.
November 29th, 2005 at 5:19 pmPot: (to Kettle) Wow, you are black.
(no racial overtones meant)
November 29th, 2005 at 5:21 pmHe reminds me of Christina Aguilara in her non stop attention getting episodes or is that Ann Coulter I’m thinking of? Can any body say THUG? I cant imagine what Nelson Poynter would think to have the St. Pete Times on a smear list. I guess Fox has to keep their sensationalism fair and balanced, Bill O is becoming another Michael Jackson dangle berry on the spyhincter of the great Fox orafice that so many people have to engorge themselves with. Homer Simpson has more credibility than Bill “at a medium pace” O.
November 29th, 2005 at 5:27 pmAre you kidding me, he only posted three places? Tat’s fvcking bullsh!t.
Hey Bill a lot more than three sites think you are full of sh!t.
I’m gonna go by the domain: http://www.billoriellyisfullofshit.com
November 29th, 2005 at 5:27 pmI love this:
They are dishonest and not worth your time and money.
Couldn’t he put his own name on the list?
November 29th, 2005 at 5:30 pmI wrote Bill and begged him to put me on the list. He ignored my pleas HOWEVER my hometown paper The St. Petersburg Times made the cut. I am SO PROUD. By the by he did’t list any of the blogs because obviously someone way smarter then him pointed out to Bill that that would give wonderful sites like Think Progress too much publicity. Better to smear the three he listed so that he didn’t have to deal with facts. Ha. Bravo St. Pete Times. Bravo.
November 29th, 2005 at 5:31 pm“I love this:
They are dishonest and not worth your time and money.
Couldn’t he put his own name on the list?”
You’ll notice the first thing to come to Bill’s mind is money.
November 29th, 2005 at 5:31 pmWow have we all fallen. That this is even tolerated in our society says it all. 20 years ago this guy would have been seen as the nut he is. The situation t is far worse than just this guy. This is the water we’re swimmin in folks. America. It feels polluted to me…..does it to you?
I think the best thing that could happen now would be for everyone to ignore him. Then he’d have to deal with his “outrage” ( more like - his personal issues) all by his lonesome. Wouldn’t it be nice. Problem is, there is a whole kettle of little O Reillys trying to make their twisted reality everyone elses. Oh well. Luckily things seem to be shifting back toward sanity slowly as all the lies are exposed. Those loud Republicans that just “keep it up” ala things like this list, don’t care about the truth…it’s all about saving face now cause they are scared.
November 29th, 2005 at 5:33 pmCome on Bill not worth your money? The St.Pete has this great story in todays’ edition about mobile Strip clubs across from the Bucs stadium. I could get a hot chick to call him and read it to him or leave it on his voice mail FOR FREE!
November 29th, 2005 at 5:35 pmyeah, Fly man. That’s the level we’re talkin bout. Good one. Total loser and a mass of inconsitencies he.
November 29th, 2005 at 5:38 pm#25,
Maybe if you offered a falafel too?
Seriously, I really think all the big winger
November 29th, 2005 at 5:43 pmscreamers are just in it for the money
they get from their rube listeners.
They don’t really believe the crap
they spew. They can’t be that dumb.
I think they just laugh to the bank
that people:
1) Listen to them
2) Believe a word they say.
Wait a second!! Where the hell is Media Matters? Isn’t that the site that pisses him off the most? Oh yeah, he doesn’t want to plug it. Dumbass…
November 29th, 2005 at 5:47 pmInteresting that MSNBC made the cut. Isn’t it Fox’s main competitor? Hmmm.
November 29th, 2005 at 5:51 pmthree? just three?!
billy you took an awful long time to do so little homework. if you were back in the sixth grade i’d say it’s time for a parent/teacher conference about what to do about our little billy.
November 29th, 2005 at 5:52 pmYou know, when I was reading the comments on the earlier BO’R thread, I thought, “What ever happened to his hit list?”, and presto, here it is! What a waste–I’m pretty sure all of us wrote begging to be on the list! And, as Wayne said, what about Media Matters, or even David Brock? What a wuss!
I think that it’s despicable that one has to pay to make comments on his website. Oh, well, there’s always oreilly@foxnews.com.
Boy, I feel totally let down. What a bastard!
November 29th, 2005 at 5:53 pmHe must of been really hung over and one of his cronies was like,
“Hey Bill! Remember after we did that entire 8-ball of coke two weeks ago, and you said you were going to publish an enemies list on your website?”
And Bill was like,
“Damn it! Quick! Pick three media outlets with more credibility than me!”
And his crony was like,
“Bill! There are tons! You want just three?”
And then Bill passed out from snorting coke off of a hooker’s ass.
November 29th, 2005 at 5:54 pmKeith Olberman is da bomb baby! O’Reilly needs to go implode somewhere by himself…he has turned into such a joke.
November 29th, 2005 at 5:54 pmI think he could be testing the waters to see if he could be prosecuted under the RICO act. Seriously, he has suggested a veiled boycott of three corporations and their advertisers. Is some one out there in blogdom familiar with this approach? I may be way out there but you all have been asking the obvious questions and money IS the issue.
November 29th, 2005 at 5:54 pmOuch, I bet MSNBC and the rest are shaking in their boots.
November 29th, 2005 at 5:58 pmPerhaps we can initiate a boycott of his shows and advertisers. I bet if we organized it correctly it would have a massive and immediate impact. Hmmm.
November 29th, 2005 at 6:02 pmAnd what’s this ‘royal’ “we” crap? Bill and who else? The website is just billo’reilly.com, so, who’s “we”?
I think he’s going to be twisting in the wind all by his lonesome when those three corporations’ lawyers come a-knockin’.
November 29th, 2005 at 6:02 pmBO….check under your bed tonight….can’t tell where those enemies might be hiding. When you publish “enemies lists”, you’ve lost the argument, BOBO. It’s great to see that the implosion is underway…..
November 29th, 2005 at 6:02 pmWish someone would hack his site and put O’Reilly Factor on that list
November 29th, 2005 at 6:06 pmWhat? Isn’t that fool getting enough kinky sex? Or something?
I like the idea of hacking his site to add his own name to the list… :-)
November 29th, 2005 at 6:09 pmHis list reminds me of the lists the Sturmabteilung (the SA the precursors to the Gestapo) circulated of German citizens and merchants who supported Jewish merchants and businesses.
Now, I’m not calling O’reilly a Nazi, (although he would look good in a red arm band), I just call him an asshole.
November 29th, 2005 at 6:11 pmThink he’s kinding try this link. He knows who his audience is.
November 29th, 2005 at 6:11 pmhttp://www.afa.net/targetboycott.asp
What a gaylord.
November 29th, 2005 at 6:11 pmHere is a good one if anyone is interested.
November 29th, 2005 at 6:16 pmskinthefox.com/sponsors_001.htm
#42 That guy is a total crackpot. He tried to have shows like “NYPD Blue” banned before they even aired based on nothing more than rumors. (He never saw an episode before he began his boycott.)
That man has absolutely no credibility. In fact, whenever I hear that he doesn’t like something, I try very hard to check it out for myself because I figure that if he hates it, I’ll probably enjoy it.
I didn’t even know he was still around. It looks like he’s still a desperate attention-seeker. We should all boycott him.
November 29th, 2005 at 6:20 pmhey! dont forget air america radio.
November 29th, 2005 at 6:21 pmThere’s a little black list on the net today…
November 29th, 2005 at 6:21 pmIt’s the same bullshit as yesterday…
#47
I have stood here before trying to rack my brain,
But the things Billy says are completely insane,
I guess I’m always hoping that they’ll end his reign,
But it’s my destiny to be a guy named Wayne.
I apologize. I’ll stop now.
November 29th, 2005 at 6:28 pmLast one for tonight, try http://www. mediamatters.org. It appears NBC & MSNBC are trying to take on Fox news for who’s the most bloviant & scurrilous. I don’t discount Bill cause there is a lot of folks who can only hear his few spew points and that is why we have the leadership we have today because of the anti-secular, anti-gay, anti-liberal hate mongering fear riddled opportunists.
November 29th, 2005 at 6:40 pmI’m not on O’Reilly’s list, but he’s on mine.
November 29th, 2005 at 6:40 pmYou know, I bet he had this whole list laid out, with hundreds of names and blogs and websites and news organizations and non-profits.
Then he sat down and got so angry about the posiibility that he would actually be giving them free publicity and/or mainstream credibility that he just started narrowing the list until he could only come up with three examples.
November 29th, 2005 at 6:41 pmTP seems to spend too much time worrying about Bill O’Reilly and Fox News. Could it be that you guys are worried that the truth actually does get out? That could explain why their ratings are so much higher than MSNBC. Hurts not to have the media monopoly anymore doesn’t it?
November 29th, 2005 at 6:41 pmThe truth? From Bill O’Reilly and Fox News??? You need to get out more, Randy. Those guys stay as far away from the truth as possible.
The whole canard about the media being liberal was started by the right decades ago (Pat Buchanan contributed to that lie in the early days) because they felt that their “message†wasn’t getting out in the mainstream media. What they failed to understand about journalism is that it’s supposed to be about “objectivityâ€, not “balanceâ€. I seriously recommend that you read David Brock’s “The Republican Noise Machineâ€. You will definitely learn something.
Seriously, read a book! (And not one published by Regnery.)
November 29th, 2005 at 6:49 pmRandy, even right-wing neocon Bill (PNAC) Kristol admitted recently that there never really was a left-wing media, so you can give up that old line. And, no, we’re not “worried that the truth actually does get out” via BOR and Fux “News”, because they have nothing to do with the truth OR news. Read “The Republican Noise Machine” by David Brock, then come back and admit that you’re wrong.
November 29th, 2005 at 6:51 pmRandy, TP and we commentors are not worrying about BO & Fox “News,” we’re laughing at them.
November 29th, 2005 at 6:53 pmDamn it, Wayne, you type faster than I do! Well, Randy, I think that you get our point!
November 29th, 2005 at 6:53 pmKristol once told The New Yorker that “the liberal media were never that powerful, and the whole thing was often used as an excuse by conservatives for conservative failures,â€
This tired old republican lie has been laid to rest by the NeoCons themselves, those who repeat it are just morons.
November 29th, 2005 at 6:55 pmRandy,
How’s your ex-wife. Still a lonely republican kook, or have you been drinking with your buddies to forget your failed and miserable life…
November 29th, 2005 at 6:56 pmRandy,
Please quote a “truth” that you feel that you feel that Fox/O’Reilly let out that the liberal media attempted to suppress. One example is all that I ask and should be no problem for you since your blanket claim implies that they are considerable in number.
November 29th, 2005 at 6:57 pm“TP seems to spend too much time worrying about Bill O’Reilly and Fox News.”
Actually, we find him quite funny. He could only come up with three sites. Shoot. I can think of ten off the top of my head.
“Could it be that you guys are worried that the truth actually does get out?”
Actually, we are scared it won’t get out.
“That could explain why their ratings are so much higher than MSNBC.”
Yes, but once again in perspective. 1.4 million people watch Fox News. 2.5 million people play World of Warcraft. So, more people would rather [;ay a video game than watch Fox News.
“Hurts not to have the media monopoly anymore doesn’t it?”
We don’t have one.
Don’t you think it’s odd that you give a rats ass what the hell we think, post, say or do?
November 29th, 2005 at 6:59 pmIf the entire sphere of media is liberal except for Fox News, why would we be worried about competition from one network? CBS, NBC, ABC, MSNBC, CNN combined rating share is probably greater than Fox News and its affiliates.
It’s not a monopoly, but it’s pretty close.
November 29th, 2005 at 6:59 pmSeems Randy did not want to respond. Too bad. I suspect that just typing the word “truth” probably caused his computer to freeze up and his head to implode.
Just a theory.
November 29th, 2005 at 7:06 pmYeah Randy, why are we so afraid of Fox News? It’s not like they’re going to dupe the country into a foreign war of occupation, financed with borrowed money. Ummm… right?
November 29th, 2005 at 7:09 pmI have a suggestion: get as many organizations as possible to *beg* to get onto the list. Treat it like a badge of honor and patriotism, rather than something to feel frustrated or angry about.
November 29th, 2005 at 7:09 pmI’m very disappointed that my smug-yet-snarky lefty blog didn’t make the list yet.
Ah, well….guess I’ll just post the Mackris transcripts over and over again…
November 29th, 2005 at 7:10 pmhttp://www.newshounds.us/ 2005/ 05/ 18/ fox_news_in_ratings_free_fall.php
“TV Newser cited a CNN press release which gave these totals for Fox’s primetime audience in the 25 to 54 age bracket: Oct. 04: 1,074,000; Nov. 04: 891,000; Dec. 04: 568,000; Jan. 05: 564,000; Feb. 05: 520,000; March 05: 498,000; April 05: 445,000. That amounts to a decline of 58 percent, with no sign of leveling off.”
I’m not sure where 1.4 million came from, faux news is looking about as popular as bush is. If they keep this up, the saudis will be able to take over newscorp with monopoly money!
And I bet at least half of those who still watch faux news, do so just record and debunk it’s daily spew of misinformation.
November 29th, 2005 at 7:11 pmWayne already emailed the St. Petersburg Times, letting them know that they’re on O’Lielly’s list, and asking them what they did to piss him off. He’s going to do the same to Keith Olberman (sp?). Maybe O’Lielly will make Keith’s “#1 Worst Person” tonight!
November 29th, 2005 at 7:13 pm#44 - Thanks. That’s really what we need to be doing is setting aside a bit of time to inform these advertisers we won’t be doing business with them until they stop doing business with FOX and deviant sons!
November 29th, 2005 at 7:13 pm“445,000″
Ryan,
Thanks for that link. That is even better. I can now say five times as many people want to play a video game instead of watching Fox News
November 29th, 2005 at 7:13 pmTP seems to spend too much time worrying about Bill O’Reilly and Fox News. Could it be that you guys are worried that the truth actually does get out? That could explain why their ratings are so much higher than MSNBC. Hurts not to have the media monopoly anymore doesn’t it?
Comment by Randy — November 29, 2005 @ 6:41 pm
So now MSNBC is part of a vast “liberal conspiracy” to cover up the truth? Is that what it is?
MSNBC is co-owned by Microsoft and NBC, two corporate behemoths. It boggles the mind to think that these companies would have a “liberal” viewpoint.
What’s more, NBC is largely owned by General Electric, a very large defense contractor. GE liberal? Me thinks not.
We are definitely not worried that the truth will come out of MSNBC. It just so happens that FoxNews is the worst offender of them all.
November 29th, 2005 at 7:14 pmWhat’s more, NBC is largely owned by General Electric, a very large defense contractor. GE liberal? Me thinks not.
Comment by Gregor Samsa
Then you don’t know anything about big multinationals. Nothing at all. Don’t forget, Liberals started the Vietnam war and dropped the first atomic bomb. Liberals love to kill.
November 29th, 2005 at 7:17 pmRyan, your last point is correct. I know that Wayne and I only watch it to see what lies they’re telling.
November 29th, 2005 at 7:17 pmI thought Huffington was helping O’Reilly compile his list? But he only has three enemies!? So what does a blogger or think tank have to do to get on O’Reilly’s enemies list?
November 29th, 2005 at 7:17 pmAmen Gregor, amen.
November 29th, 2005 at 7:18 pmYou see, he only listed three because if he was to post the vast list of sites that trash his lies, his viewers my catch on to the fact that he is full of shit.
November 29th, 2005 at 7:22 pmWhat a nice gift. I want to make sure all of my media sources consider Bill to be nothing more than a tiny little irrelevant gossip columnist. This way, I don’t have to waste my time reading archives. It’s like having someone else make out my holiday shopping list for me. Thanks Billy!
November 29th, 2005 at 7:23 pmAss Cheek-RIGHT-Ass Cheek,
Interesting assertions that you make about liberals loving to kill and the broad statements you made about Vietnam and the atomic bomb. However, can you provide some facts that back up your claims? The history and facts that I’m aware of do not support your assertions and, in fact, contradict them. I am interested in hearing the information that you have.
November 29th, 2005 at 7:25 pmI’m thrilled that our little St. Pete Times made the list. That is an honor for a newspaper in a formerly red state, now blue - thank you very much.
November 29th, 2005 at 7:26 pm“Then you don’t know anything about big multinationals. Nothing at all. Don’t forget, Liberals started the Vietnam war and dropped the first atomic bomb. Liberals love to kill.
Comment by I-RIGHT-I ”
I know a lot about multinationals and american history, and I can say with all certainty that you’re retarded on both accounts.
November 29th, 2005 at 7:28 pmThen you don’t know anything about big multinationals. Nothing at all. Don’t forget, Liberals started the Vietnam war and dropped the first atomic bomb. Liberals love to kill.
Comment by I-RIGHT-I — November 29, 2005 @ 7:17 pm
This makes no sense whatsoever.
November 29th, 2005 at 7:29 pmThis begs the leagal question: at which point does he become responsible for anothers actions against these sites?
November 29th, 2005 at 7:29 pmPessimist,
The difference between democrats and republicans in wars, is that democrats win, and republicans lose.
November 29th, 2005 at 7:30 pmHowever, it was FOX and Duhbya’s cousin that first stated he won the 2000 election and now look at what we have! Better to know the enemy and not take it too lightly. Some ignorance is best to be ignored (IRI, WW, MA, etc) especially if they don’t have any significance to sustain them; others are best to keep on the radar screen (FOX, Rove, etc) because they can, and have done a hell of alot of damage.
November 29th, 2005 at 7:30 pmHey, maybe Randy went out to a bookstore to buy “The Republican Noise Machine”?
November 29th, 2005 at 7:30 pm“This makes no sense whatsoever.”
I was gonna say the same thing Gregor.
November 29th, 2005 at 7:30 pm#77 Pessimist,
Much as I hate to admit when I-R-I comes even close to the truth, it was LBJ who escalated our involvement in Vietnam and Harry Truman did order the first (and only) two atomic bombs dropped. But after he did that, the world came to realize just how deadly and dangerous these weapons are to innocent people.
But as for his crap about “Liberals love to kill”, I would say that he’s way off the mark there. It’s conservatives who love to use the death penalty and who cried when it was stopped in the seventies, who hate to see any kind of weapon (like cop-killer bullets) banned, and who blindly support the illegal and unjustified war in Iraq.
Liberals hate to kill unnecessarily. Conservatives have no problem with it.
November 29th, 2005 at 7:33 pmWayne,
In each of those cases the democrats were in new and uncharted territory. The difference between democrats and republicans, is that democrats are cerebral and actually LEARN from history. Republicans blame historians for the failure, instead of the failure itself. It’s a psychotic detachment from reality.
November 29th, 2005 at 7:35 pmGregor and SpudgeBoy: Not only does IRI not make sense in the context of this thread, but doesn’t he realize that the full epithet is “bleeding-heart liberals”? “Bleeding-heart” and killing don’t mix.
November 29th, 2005 at 7:37 pmRyan,
Well put, as usual.
Yes, liberals, who by their nature actually use their brains do learn from their past actions, even going so far as to admit when they were wrong (which is something I have yet to hear this president do about anything other than trading Sammy Sosa.)
They really do seem to be uncomfortable when dealing with reality, don’t they? They seem happiest when they are “cavorting” about in their own delusional universe. Speaking of which, where is NED these days? What did he do, pick up the wrong guy at a bar in NYC?
November 29th, 2005 at 7:40 pmLiberals hate to kill unnecessarily. Conservatives have no problem with it.
Comment by Wayne A. Schneider — November 29, 2005 @ 7:33 pm
We have I-RIGHT-I, on the record, advocating mass killings and genocide. So, yeah, they have no problem at all…
November 29th, 2005 at 7:45 pmI RIGHT…
ARE YOU STILL RUNNING AWAY…
I pulled your card and like a punk, you are hiding like a little P***y and you still refuse to step to the plate…
Let’s settle this!!! YOU support Bush…I have a friend that can be at your place tomorrow…
We need soldiers…What is your answer?
At least TWO liberals are serving in the service of their country? Why can’t you? Do Neo-Cons hide behind their mama’s dress or lame excuse of injury? Of is COWARD an accurate sentiment?
Still waiting for ya…and EVERYONE can see you are SCARED of meeting me man-to-man!
November 29th, 2005 at 7:45 pmNever fear. I shall smite him. How dare he leave me off of this list??
November 29th, 2005 at 7:49 pmGregor,
And let’s not forget the talentless Ann Coulter who said (of the terrorists after 9/11), “We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity.”
Funny how they don’t seem to see the disconnect between claiming to be followers of Christ’s teachings and being devotees of mass murder at the same time. Was there another Jesus Christ of which I was previously unaware? Because the one I heard about would NEVER support the Republican/conservative agenda.
I seem to remember he said, “What you do to the least of you, you do to me.” (Or something to that effect.) He sure didn’t sound like a war-monger to me.
November 29th, 2005 at 7:51 pmLOL, wait to you see WHO owns those ‘LEFT WING’ Corporations they Listed are owned by.
AnyHOO,
FILLth O’Liely Racist Rants,
Duhbyas Buddies from Blackwater USA, and Wackenhut said they Need your HELP fighting those Al Qaeda P-2 government spooks. Perhaps you can even get a chance to go to an secret Prison BILL and stick Feeding tube down some poor goat farmers throat. Somehow I just KNOW you will Enjoy that!
Say FILLth, did ya Like My Sponge Bob Tune?
Kapn;”Whos Slimy as Hell and Flops like a Fish?”
Crew; “FILLth O’Liely Racist Rants!”
And yes Im gonna put it on the online journal FILLth.
November 29th, 2005 at 7:53 pmLIST IT PLEASE!!- I DOUBLE NAUGHT dare YA. mmuuuahahahaaaa -Aj
#92 - God , I need to tell you this , plain and simple . Here it is : O’Lielly THINKS he’s worshiping you , but he ACTUALLY prays to a vibrating fafelel every night ! You’d be SO proud of the altar , though - embroidered cloths draped just so , golden candles burning , the works !!! T’would bring a tear to your Almighty Eye , really , the SINcereity that ol’ Bill invests in his kneelin’ and squealin’ ! … ;)
November 29th, 2005 at 8:02 pmA careful examination of both events that AC-R-AC carelessly blames on democrats shows that the characterization is both false and inappropriate because both events were not driven by the political agenda of either ot the current political parties of republicans or democrats. Therefore the claim itself is as irresponsible as it is ignorant. What next? Will we be arguing that republicans make better seamstresses than democrats because they know how to spin a yarn?
What AC-R-AC attempts to obscure by throwing out baseless and senseless claims are the cold hard facts of the truth in which we live. Consider that indictments are coming down all around washington, torture is being discussed in “technicalities” while totally missing the attrocity that it is even being discussed (and, defended), and we are in the midst of an illegal war based entirely on lies at the cost of precious lives and, to a lesser extent, enormous economic resources. These truths are horrendous and despicable and it is irrelevant and simplistic to argue them on the basis of political parties. I can guarantee that for myself, and I believe anyone of conscience, that I would be as opposed to these attrocities regardless of the “party” in power.
November 29th, 2005 at 8:03 pmStill waiting for ya…and EVERYONE can see you are SCARED of meeting me man-to-man!
Comment by IraqVet
I didn’t see you publish your address? I’m not scared of any face to face but the fact is the Filthy Left has a history of doing things in the dark, on the sly and behind your back. What do you have in mind?
Oh, and I’m not enlisting. Hell, we’ve got you, right? You’ll be there to make sure some leftist national guardsman doesn’t frag an officer or toss a grenade into a tent full of his sleeping comrades, right?
November 29th, 2005 at 8:04 pmLiberals hate to kill unnecessarily. Conservatives have no problem with it.
Comment by Wayne A. Schneider
A number of yet to be named dead unborn babies will look down from heaven and cry at your funeral because you didn’t even try to get it.
November 29th, 2005 at 8:07 pmHear, hear, Pessimist! I don’t see how anyone could disagree with your logic. Very well put.
November 29th, 2005 at 8:09 pmTP seems to spend too much time worrying about Bill O’Reilly and Fox News. Could it be that you guys are worried that the truth actually does get out? That could explain why their ratings are so much higher than MSNBC. Hurts not to have the media monopoly anymore doesn’t it?
Comment by Randy
Randy, you ignorant, backward boob, the cable news channels are the backwater of the media, like where you live, in the sticks, without flush toilets. Daily Kos alone is larger than the entire right wing blogosphere. Tliberal/progressive blogosphere surpassed cable back in June in the critical 20 to 45 demographic and has been growing by leaps and bounds ever since while clowns like you are just shrinking and slinking back under the rocks you crawled out from under.
November 29th, 2005 at 8:09 pmWhat teasonous venom you spew I-R-I.
November 29th, 2005 at 8:09 pmOur country will do much better without
“patriots” like you.
We have I-RIGHT-I, on the record, advocating mass killings and genocide. So, yeah, they have no problem at all…
Comment by Gregor Samsa
It worked pretty good in Germany and Japan but of course we called it something else; war, I think.
November 29th, 2005 at 8:09 pm#96 Good point. I hadn’t thought of it that way. While the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution and the dropping of Fat Boy and Little Man (were those the right names?) had nothing to do with party ideology, the war in Iraq is about nothing BUT party ideology. And it would never have been supported had the truth been told from the beginning (the truth included the fact that the Vice President wanted that war before they made it into office.) Do any of the trolls believe that if President Bush and Vice President Cheney campaigned in 2000 saying, “And when we get into office, we’ll find some excuse to get rid of Saddam Hussein!” that they would have come close to winning? People would have rightfully responded, “Oh, yeah? And then who?”
November 29th, 2005 at 8:10 pmAss Cheek-RIGHT-Ass Cheek,
Glad to see that you are back. Please quote some factual history to support your claim that the “Filthy Left has a history of doing things in the dark, on the sly and behind your back”.
Waiting for your response.
November 29th, 2005 at 8:10 pmDang, all this talk about killing the enemy makes me hungry. Later losers.
November 29th, 2005 at 8:11 pmYes, run away you teasonous wretch.
November 29th, 2005 at 8:12 pmI-R-I yeah, whatever. At least they won’t be crying at your funeral because they know you won’t be going anywhere near them up there.
By the way, are you implying that only liberals get abortions? Because that’s quite a leap into la-la land. If you guys get your way and abortions are outlawed completely, only rich Republicans will be able to afford to travel to another country to get one, like they used to do in the old days.
November 29th, 2005 at 8:14 pmMr. Schneider,
Excellent point and a source of confusion to me. I would argue that the ideology that is behind much of what is happening is not really republican/conservative. However, the republican party has been tricked into adopting it, at least temporarily, with the promise of power and wealth.
What I cannot fathom is how so many people have not owned up to being duped and feel that it is their obligation to continue to support this administration even when in their heart of hearts that have to know that they’ve been deceived. It’s mind boggling.
November 29th, 2005 at 8:16 pmAnd once again Ass Cheek-RIGHT-Ass Cheek runs away. I’m sorry sir but I have no other choice but to conclude that you are both an extreme idiot and a monumental coward.
November 29th, 2005 at 8:18 pmThis really is pretty funny. I wouldn’t watch Faux News on a bet. The advertisers who may be trying to reach me, will never find me there. On the other hand, I am always at MSNBC! I did follow O’Reilly’s sex scandal a while back, and Fox totally lost their credibility by not dumping that sexual deviate. He makes my skin crawl just thinking about him.
November 29th, 2005 at 8:19 pmMr. P.,
It is mind-boggling, isn’t it? Perhaps it’s the fear of realizing that everything they believe in (or most of it anyway) cannot be grounded in reality or supported by facts.
I use to have a friend who stopped talking to me about a year and a half ago. (He was a conservative.) I asked him to explain why anyone would vote for President Bush (as opposed to simply voting against John Kerry). In typical conservative fashion, he immediately started bringing up Bill Clinton. (I never mentioned him.) When I suggested that perhaps they were duped by the promise of tax cuts that primarily went to the top income earners, he ended our friendship.
He never did answer my question, either.
November 29th, 2005 at 8:22 pmI wonder If Cindy Sheehams name is on the List.
November 29th, 2005 at 8:25 pmI wonder if any Hurricane Victims name are on the list?
I wonder How many Dead Soldiers Names are on the List?
I wonder, Is Pat Tillmans Name on the List?
I wonder how many Homeless Vets name is on B.O s List?
B.O.?(Bill O rielly? or Body Odor)?
I would like to see Bill post the top three women he would like to have phone sex with. At least we might believe him for being honest with THAT posting.
November 29th, 2005 at 8:28 pmMr. Schneider,
If the issues were not so serious, and the effects so morally appalling, one might even say the behavior of “Right” is akin to that of a stubborn child.
November 29th, 2005 at 8:28 pm#113 I would list my top three but I know for a fact that my wife would read it minutes later. And then it would be a long ride home. :)
(Love ya, Honey!) :)
November 29th, 2005 at 8:29 pmIf liberals are so smart, as smart as many of you think you are, why aren’t you in charge? Don’t give me the bullshit that the elections were stolen either. Your little campaign to get the U.S. to surrender to Al Qaeda is starting to lose its fizz according to the Washington Post as well. Lets face it, middle America is not as stupid as you all think we are. We have the majority and we intend to build on it in the next election. We are already correcting the mistakes of the past with recent Supreme Court appointments and its only going to get better. Suckers!
November 29th, 2005 at 8:32 pmMr. P.,
I would say that their actions are akin to that of a spoiled child despite the fact that the issues are so serious and the effects so appalling.
Look at the way the O’Lielly (remember him? we started talking about him) reacts when Media Matters points out his hypocrisies. He can’t stand the fact that someone can factually refute some of the things he says. (I say “some†because he’s not lying when he promises that he’ll be back after a commercial break.)
November 29th, 2005 at 8:34 pm#98
“A number of yet to be named dead unborn babies will look down from heaven and cry at your funeral because you didn’t even try to get it.”
Sorry, you are not supported by the majority on abortion.
CNN
November 28, 2005
Poll: Americans back abortion limits, oppose ban
http://www.cnn.com/ 2005/ US/ 11/ 27/ abortion.poll/ index.html
“Thirty-nine percent of the respondents said that abortion should only be legal in a few circumstances, 26 percent believe it should be legal in all circumstances, and 16 percent favor legal abortion in most circumstances.
Another 16 percent said it should not be legal under any circumstances, the poll showed.”
For those keeping score at home, that’s:
26% All Legal
16% Most Legal
39% Few Legal
16% None Legal
So, 81% of the country thinks that at the very minimum a few abortions should be legal, 42% believe Most should be legal.
But ONLY 16% of Americans want to Ban abortion.
November 29th, 2005 at 8:34 pm#115, Wayne, speaking of home…
Well, now that IRI has gone off to drink some fresh puppy blood, and much as both of us would like to stay and chat with Pessimist, etc., we have to head home. I’m looking forward to tomorrow’s posts!
‘Night, all!
November 29th, 2005 at 8:35 pm#116
“Your little campaign to get the U.S. to surrender to Al Qaeda is starting to lose its fizz according to the Washington Post as well.”
Link, Proof, Link, Proof, Link, Proof, Link, Proof, Link, Proof, Link, Proof, Link, Proof, Link, Proof, Link, Proof, Link, Proof, Link, Proof, Link, Proof, Link, Proof, Link, Proof, Link, Proof, Link, Proof, Link, Proof, Link, Proof, Link, Proof, Link, Proof, Link, Proof, Link, Proof, Link, Proof, Link, Proof, Link, Proof, Link, Proof, Link, Proof, Link, Proof, Link, Proof, Link, Proof, Link, Proof, Link, Proof, Link, Proof, Link, Proof, Link, Proof, Link, Proof, Link, Proof, Link, Proof, Link, Proof, Link, Proof, Link, Proof, Link, Proof, Link, Proof, Link, Proof, Link, Proof,
November 29th, 2005 at 8:35 pmRandy,
Would you care to post a link to the Washington Post story that backs up what you say? Especially the part about our efforts to return our troops safely home as being equal to the U.S. surrendering to Al Qaeda. I promise to read it and respond.
November 29th, 2005 at 8:37 pmHey, Spudge. Jane is right, we have to get going. (The cats will be angry with us.)
Do me a favor, soldier, and follow up on any of Randy’s “proof.” (I left the USAF as an E-5; if that outranks you, consider it an order. :) )
Thanks, brother.
November 29th, 2005 at 8:40 pmIf liberals are so smart, as smart as many of you think you are, why aren’t you in charge?
Comment by Randy — November 29, 2005 @ 8:32 pm
So this is what your postings are about… a pissing contest to see who is smarter?
Well, you are not in charge either. And you cannot be smart by association: Someone in the Republican party is smart. That does not make you smart, even if you are a card-carrying Republican.
November 29th, 2005 at 8:41 pmOLeilly forgot the United States Constitution, clearly that’s the biggest enemy of all NeoCon fascists…
November 29th, 2005 at 8:43 pmRandy Sez:
“Lets face it, middle America is not as stupid as you all think we are.”
What do you mean “we”? You do not represent
middle America.
I do not think middle America (whatever that REALLY
November 29th, 2005 at 8:44 pmmeans) is stupid, but I am getting the strong impression
you are.
Randy, you got back from the bookstore already?
So, you’re saying that the WP says that the liberals’ campaign to surrender to Al Qaeda (sp?) is starting to lose its fizz? I doubt if the WP put it quite that way. Randy, listen closely: THERE IS NO LIBERAL CAMPAIGN TO SURRENDER TO AL QAEDA!!
Okay, did you get that?
I really do have to leave now, I just couldn’t resist one last comment. So don’t make me do it again!
November 29th, 2005 at 8:46 pm“If liberals are so smart, as smart as many of you think you are, why aren’t you in charge?” RandyDivorceeToTheRedneckNoStars
The british royal family was in charge of england for generations, and do you believe they were in charge because they were smarter?
Do you believe Saddam was in charge because he was smarter?
Do you believe Osama is in charge of AlQaeda because he’s smarter?
Do you believe Kim Jung Il is in charge of North Korea because he’s smarter?
Sometimes people are in charge because they cheat, steal, lie, bully and kill. That doesn’t make them ’smarter’, but it often demostrates that they lack a moral or a social compass. Only a psychotic retard things might makes right, or that the strongest, meanest or sleaziest person is ’smarter’. But since you’ve clearly never succeeded in life because you are smart, perhaps those methods of ‘cheating’ are all you have to fall back on. It explains your association with the ever inept and incompetent republicans.
November 29th, 2005 at 8:47 pm“Lets face it, middle America is not as stupid as you all think we are.†Randy
Who’s saying middle america, I’m saying republicans.
Middle american says you guys are stupid and that you suck right now. That’s why bush’s popularity is at 34%. I agree middle america is as ’stupid’ as republican strategist thought they were - you by contrast are DEFINITELY that stupid…
November 29th, 2005 at 8:48 pmI tend to believe Randy falls in the High Society (Blue Collar Playboy)Class. Her way was Paid For Before She was Ever Born!
November 29th, 2005 at 8:57 pm(New Johnny Cash Version(My name is Randy , isnt that just dandy?).
sarcasm,
Yeah, randy is like most of the trolls, not too bright, but he tries to make up for it in misplaced attitude and overinflated ego.
I always say that you don’t go to a retail clerk to get dentistry done, yet republican whackos see no problems of putting military, economic, scientific, medical, disaster relief and any number of other activities in the hands of inept religious and political zealots who are TOTALLY clueless about the topics.
This ‘redneck republican’ set are particularly guilty of supporting and rationalizing this activity. It’s just idiocy.
November 29th, 2005 at 9:03 pmOh my God!!!! Bill, beore you post my name on the Bill O’Reilly smear merchant’s list, just remember one thing. I’m a conservative like you and when I was calling you a lying, draft-dodging, womanizing sexual pervert I was only expressing the thoughts of the lefties and “pinheads” here.
Correct me if I’m wrong, Bill, but you and I are both on the same sheet of music. I mean, I like to make dirty phone calls to women, too, pal. Talk dirty to them. You sly fox, you, I bet you can get real nasty over the phone to a gal, huh pal?
November 29th, 2005 at 9:04 pmI wish my hometown media orginazations, with the exception of the fine weekly, would do something to get themselves on some kind of list. At least it means they are doing something.
November 29th, 2005 at 9:08 pmYou mean the cock sucking Falafel loving asshole didn’t put me on the list? For shame, Billy, boy.
For shame.
Whatsamatta? Too chicken to put REAL AMERICANS who offend you?
November 29th, 2005 at 9:11 pm“Lets face it, middle America is not as stupid as you all think we are.”
But some Red States are. Follow the link, read it and weep. The ten lowest states in average IQ all voted for Bush.
http://chrisevans3d.com/files/iq.htm
Andrew “131″ G.
November 29th, 2005 at 9:12 pmIn Case Anyone didnt know it, Bill O Reilly, was a Catholic Alterboy at one time. I wonder….
November 29th, 2005 at 9:13 pmSo, when Bill O accuses you of spreading defamation, and you have not done any defaming, doesn’t that make Bill O guilty of defamation?
November 29th, 2005 at 9:15 pmYou got it!
30th Field Artillery Regiment
Fort Sill, OK 73503
I believe I gave you my name!
November 29th, 2005 at 9:19 pmHey, If I-RIGHT-I is still around he needs to answer three questions.
1) Are you 35? If so I am older than you, that leaves Intelligence and Wisdom.
2) How do you want to prove Intelligence?
3) How do you want to prove Wisdom?
I’m willing to prove that following your criteria, my comments about what I believe are more valid than yours.
You claimed that they were becose you were older (apparently not), wiser and more intelligent.
Now, either put up, or shut up.
Z.
November 29th, 2005 at 9:24 pmWhat does Bill O`reilly think to accomplish by putting this list? what an idiot., Do us a favor O`Reilly enlist and go fight the war in Iraq.
November 29th, 2005 at 9:33 pmI think is an honor to be on your enemy list., I want to be on your list.
I-R-I, Was scrolling through very quickly and thought you might be able to share some info. On this thread there’s a “contributor” named “IraqVet” and on another thread there was a person named “Daughter of Viet Vet”. Did either say which side they were on?? With the majority of this group, one can’t help but wonder.
November 29th, 2005 at 9:57 pmOH MY GAWD!!!! I could swear I was swimming in the cesspool now that America allows the likes of bill o’ shit to prowl around the alleyways of horse ding. Geezuz good god almighty when the hell is this America gonna wake up to the fact that our culture has now tipped over the edge swingin towards certain doom. But let me be honest, this rotted rear end of a human being knows exactly what he is doing. There are enough cancerous lunatics out there who howl for more more of this fringe nazi’s hot air. Just remember folks what goes round comes round. Lee Atwater comes to mind.
November 29th, 2005 at 10:03 pmMightHermaphrodite,
We all know what side you’re on, AIPAC and other zionist traitors like you are clearly fighting for non-american NeoCon interests. However your smears of actual american soldiers who’ve served or who’s parents have served is hateful, spiteful and unpatriotic. But so are all of your politican and economic positions. Your mother should have stayed in austria, you and your unamerican values clearly don’t belong in this country.
November 29th, 2005 at 10:18 pmAnd you’ve never answered my question MightyHermaphrodite, why do so many NeoCon zionists seem to be spies, or related to spies for israel? Chertoff’s own mother was a mossad agent, and Feith was caught spying for israel.
What’s up, are rightwing jews all traitors and spies, or are only a few of you relegated to such unamerican behavior. When you count in that you’ve consistently posted propaganda lies that are pro-israel, and anti-iraqi, yet they are quickly debunked as anti-semitic and anti-arab propaganda, one has to wonder who’s side you’re on. I know as an american, I have pause as to your patriotism and loyalty!
November 29th, 2005 at 10:21 pmAside from Fox, Murdoch’s News Corp owns TV Guide, HarperCollins, 20th Century Fox, the London Times, and the New York Post. Murdoch also bankrolls William Kristol’s neocon mouthpiece the Weekly Standard, which has been losing money ever since it started up in the mid-1990s.
Umm Bill you might wanna start looking for a JOB, and stop burning your bridges before you get there -Aj
November 29th, 2005 at 10:23 pmOH MY GOD! YOU GOTTA CHECK THIS OUT!
November 29th, 2005 at 10:32 pmhttp://www.kindredspiritlakeside.homestead.com/Intersexuality.html
Intersexuality
And you might have heard of the term ‘hermaphrodite’, which technically means
someone who has both ovaries and testicles. …
I was wondering when someone else noticed that.
November 29th, 2005 at 10:33 pmSICK@
November 29th, 2005 at 10:35 pmmighty pervert!
November 29th, 2005 at 10:37 pmNow , thats why i lean to the left. the right are sick perverted freaks of nature!
November 29th, 2005 at 10:39 pmI,ll go to Hell before defending the Likes of them!
http://evol.allenpress.com/ evolonline/ ?request=get-document&issn=0014-3820&volume=056&issue=12&page=2374
November 29th, 2005 at 10:43 pm#
Wow have we all fallen. That this is even tolerated in our society says it all. 20 years ago this guy would have been seen as the nut he is. The situation t is far worse than just this guy. This is the water we’re swimmin in folks. America. It feels polluted to me…..does it to you?
I think the best thing that could happen now would be for everyone to ignore him. Then he’d have to deal with his “outrage†( more like - his personal issues) all by his lonesome. Wouldn’t it be nice. Problem is, there is a whole kettle of little O Reillys trying to make their twisted reality everyone elses. Oh well. Luckily things seem to be shifting back toward sanity slowly as all the lies are exposed. Those loud Republicans that just “keep it up†ala things like this list, don’t care about the truth…it’s all about saving face now cause they are scared.
Comment by Suzanne — November 29, 2005 @ 5:33 pm
November 29th, 2005 at 11:02 pmI found a man for Mighty Hermaphrodite:
http://www.thenation.com/doc/20050530/mcgarvey
November 29th, 2005 at 11:05 pmZwack-
You forgot to ask IRI that if he’s 35 and single AND…
what does his mother’s basement look like considering if it’s still his residence.
Any moron who questions Iraq Vet and has never served
November 29th, 2005 at 11:08 pmprobably still lives with his parents and gotten out into the real world :)
If Bill O’Reilly wasn’t being serious, he’d be a very very funny man.
November 29th, 2005 at 11:08 pmHermogene: What is the meaning of Dionysus and Aphrodite?
Socrates: Son of Hipponicus, you ask a solemn question; there is a serious and also a facetious explanation of both these names; the serious explanation is not to be had from me, but there is no objection to your hearing the facetious one; for the Gods too love a joke. Dionusos is simply didous oinon (giver of wine), as he might be called in fun,- and oinos is properly oionous, because wine makes those who drink, think (oiesthai) that they have a mind (noun) when they have none. The derivation of Aphrodite, born of the foam (aphoros), may be fairly accepted on the authority of Hesiod.
WOW, these old PHILOSOPHERS WERE REALLY SMART!! LMAO!
November 29th, 2005 at 11:20 pmAphrodite it shall be! -Aj
The list is bizarre. I mean, there’s so many organizations and sites way way to the Left of the ones he choose, that - well I’m trying to understand his ‘reasoning, aren’t I? - his choices are nonsensical.
The St. Petersburg Times??? Oo, that’s thats a HUGE scary monster threat, now isn’t it?
November 29th, 2005 at 11:24 pmThat’s it? That pile of amateurish crap is it? My cat could have produced a more professional website than O’Reilly’s hit list, and one with content at that. Her litter box is more creative than that O’Reilly electronic empty void.
November 29th, 2005 at 11:25 pmMaybe he’s out of falafal
November 29th, 2005 at 11:33 pm………………
November 29th, 2005 at 11:43 pmO’Reilly forgot one………….
Think Progress. But, liberals are seasoned enough to handle O’Reilly. You all practice LYING for a living.
November 29th, 2005 at 11:44 pmnew story coming out.
Bush: No Iraq pullout without victory
Democratic senator urges president to give ‘unvarnished’ picture
Tuesday, November 29, 2005; Posted: 6:55 p.m. EST (23:55 GMT)
November 29th, 2005 at 11:46 pm____________________________________________________
?????????????????????????????????????????????????
MISSION ACCOMPLISHED????????I think Bush is not done yet. Lets toast him on this one, please!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
#160.
November 29th, 2005 at 11:55 pmAnyway……….
Bush LIED! Who DIED?
November 29th, 2005 at 11:56 pmBill O’Reilly is just another sadistic, perverted stalker that has nothing to offer but lies on top of lies covered in lies all sewn together with double-stitched lies.
The only way he could ever say anything of any substance is to shove his microphone straight up his ass and fart. It couldn’t be any worse than the noxious fumes eminating from his mouth!
November 30th, 2005 at 12:01 amhttp://www.cnn.com/POLITICS
November 30th, 2005 at 12:28 amhttp://www.rnla.org/AboutRNLA.asp
IRS complaint filed against Focus on the Family
Group say tax-exempt status prohibits political activity
Tuesday, November 29, 2005; Posted: 4:36 p.m. EST (21:36 GMT)
Internal Revenue Service (IRS)
Washington
Taxation
James Dobson
DENVER (AP) — A Washington-based group has asked the Internal Revenue Service to investigate whether Focus on the Family or its founder James Dobson violated IRS rules by electioneering.
James Bopp, an attorney for the Colorado Springs-based conservative Christian group, said the group has fully complied with IRS code.
The complaint, filed Monday by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, also asked the IRS to investigate whether the tax-exempt status of Focus on the Family should be revoked. Tax-exempt organizations cannot participate in campaigns for or against candidates for public office.
November 30th, 2005 at 12:35 amHe is charging defamation of three news outlets and using defamation in the process?
I blogged this radio show in contrast with his enemies list.
I’ll pull it together, you decide.
secondcivilwar.blogspot.com
November 30th, 2005 at 1:47 amSpudge,
I’m back. I relieve you. I see Randy never did respond with his “proof” that the WaPo says we liberals want the US to surrender to Al Qaeda. Thanks for keeping an eye out.
I missed Keith Olbermann last night. Does anyone know if he reacted in anyway to MSNBC being on O’Lielly’s list of “smear merchants”?
November 30th, 2005 at 8:10 amThis, as O’Lielly defines it, should be a list of millions of names/websites/news agencies. The size of the list if accurately compiled by his terms should be a huge eye opener.
Every cable and tv news station in the world except FOX, for example, would fit what he thinks are our enemies.
November 30th, 2005 at 8:41 amHow much longer before the ilk of The Capital Times (of Madison, WI) winds up on Bill O’Reilly’s “little list”?
(Recall where Senator Joseph McCarthy was also no fan of TCT; its editorials and essays were forever taking issue with McCarthy’s anti-Communist campaigns and the threat they posed to democracy, freedom and American soverignty.)
And while I’m @ it, O’Reilly might also want to listen to a certain musical number from Gilbert and Sullivan’s The Mikado from Pooh-Bah (the Lord High Executioner) as opens with these immortal lines:
As someday it must happen that the victim must be found,
November 30th, 2005 at 9:18 amI’ve got a little list–I’ve got a little list
Of Society Offenders who may well be underground;
They never will be missed–they never will be missed!
Don’t worry RYAN, because it is AMAZING for someone to question my integrity, while they hide behind the freedoms that many have died to protect…
I AM ON THE SIDE OF THE RIGHTEOUS!!! I am a VOTER, not a DEMOCRAT OR REPUBLICAN!!! I NEVER said Kerry was the right choice in the last election, but I DID acknowledge he was the ONLY alternative to this IDIOT!!!
But, hey…COWARDS like I-WRONG and HERMAPHRODITE are always looking around the corner for the exit, while others fight the battle! I have seen them from Ft. Jackson, SC to KUWAIT…
No HONOR, No CODE, No COMMON SENSE, and No PATROTISM!
November 30th, 2005 at 10:20 amdid anyone see BO on the today show this morning - katie interviewed him about W’s iraqu policy - no mention about “the list”…curious…
but bill DID say something agreeable - to paraphrase: i want to know why the iraq army isn’t trained by now!!!
then he went and remarked about how “pinheads” (those who want out of iraq, i presume) are like the ’30s german polulace, who said ‘nothing wrong here - these guys are great’, before the nazis took over…such an ass…
he was fairly agitated…matt suggested a padded room….
November 30th, 2005 at 10:28 amYou know, I am beginning to Like Communists as long as it pisses people like BOR Off!
November 30th, 2005 at 10:49 amBesides, Chinese have a Cute innocent look on thier faces. they are sorta charming
Are you an EOB?
In the tradition of other right-wing loonies such as Richard Nixon, P.J. O’Rourke, and George W. Bush, talk-radio blowhard and sexual falaphiliac Bill O’Reilly has finally unveiled his own enemies list (read: anyone who dared to criticize his wish fo…
November 30th, 2005 at 11:49 amSoon to be added: Barbra Streisand!
We had heard about Bill O’Reilly’s “hate list”, and part of it is finally up [Thanks ThinkProgress!]. The main targets on his list (those that “are the worst offenders”): MSNBC (quel shock!), The St. Petersburg Times, and the New York…
November 30th, 2005 at 12:01 pmI didn’t see you publish your address? I’m not scared of any face to face but the fact is the Filthy Left has a history of doing things in the dark, on the sly and behind your back. What do you have in mind?
Comment by I-RIGHT-I — November 29, 2005 @ 8:04 pm