<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Post Executive Editor: Froomkin Flap Is About Pleasing the White House</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thinkprogress.org/2005/12/13/froomkin-flap/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/12/13/froomkin-flap/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 14:21:22 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: skip</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/12/13/froomkin-flap/comment-page-1/#comment-308594</link>
		<dc:creator>skip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 23:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=2853#comment-308594</guid>
		<description>The question is: did the White House threaten the POST with reduced access? Harris and Downie don&#039;t look very good at all here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question is: did the White House threaten the POST with reduced access? Harris and Downie don&#8217;t look very good at all here.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=308594', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melanie Lynch</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/12/13/froomkin-flap/comment-page-1/#comment-307326</link>
		<dc:creator>Melanie Lynch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=2853#comment-307326</guid>
		<description>I am a regular reader of Daniel Froomkin I found it incredulous to read that Washington Post reporters object to the title of his column. 

It becomes painfully obvious that John Harris has no confidence in the intelligence of the Post&#039;s readers to know (and you realize it very quickly if you didnâ€™t) that unlike too many â€œjournalistsâ€, Froomkin is not and has not been a White House mouthpiece. 

It is interesting to note that since â€œjournalistsâ€ are faced with a backlash of angry readers over being spoon-fed White House pablum, that the title of his column should now become their straw man. Perhaps since John Harris is so happy with Chris Cillizza, perhaps that indicates that Daniel Froomkin is obviously too liberal for Mr. Harrisâ€™ tastes. Perhaps â€œjournalistsâ€ need to clean their own houses to regain credibility rather than turning on their own.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a regular reader of Daniel Froomkin I found it incredulous to read that Washington Post reporters object to the title of his column. </p>
<p>It becomes painfully obvious that John Harris has no confidence in the intelligence of the Post&#8217;s readers to know (and you realize it very quickly if you didnâ€™t) that unlike too many â€œjournalistsâ€, Froomkin is not and has not been a White House mouthpiece. </p>
<p>It is interesting to note that since â€œjournalistsâ€ are faced with a backlash of angry readers over being spoon-fed White House pablum, that the title of his column should now become their straw man. Perhaps since John Harris is so happy with Chris Cillizza, perhaps that indicates that Daniel Froomkin is obviously too liberal for Mr. Harrisâ€™ tastes. Perhaps â€œjournalistsâ€ need to clean their own houses to regain credibility rather than turning on their own.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=307326', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Deke</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/12/13/froomkin-flap/comment-page-1/#comment-307080</link>
		<dc:creator>The Deke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 14:37:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=2853#comment-307080</guid>
		<description>Hmmm, why are people concerned that Froomkin&#039;s opinions be distinguished from facts?  It seems to me that many people on this site get very upset with Fox news when it appears that they mix opinion with facts.  In my mind, facts and opinions should be separate and distinguished, no matter who presents them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm, why are people concerned that Froomkin&#8217;s opinions be distinguished from facts?  It seems to me that many people on this site get very upset with Fox news when it appears that they mix opinion with facts.  In my mind, facts and opinions should be separate and distinguished, no matter who presents them.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=307080', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KillCon 2006</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/12/13/froomkin-flap/comment-page-1/#comment-305947</link>
		<dc:creator>KillCon 2006</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 06:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=2853#comment-305947</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a bit more complicated than that, but you are essentially correct. Froomkin does not cover the WH. He covers those who cover the WH and in this day and age, his reporting is more than opinion, it is reporting of the larger issue, the co-opting of our once somewhat free press by government.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.first-draft.com/modules.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=4786&amp;mode=thread&amp;order=0&amp;thold=0&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;read this&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a bit more complicated than that, but you are essentially correct. Froomkin does not cover the WH. He covers those who cover the WH and in this day and age, his reporting is more than opinion, it is reporting of the larger issue, the co-opting of our once somewhat free press by government.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.first-draft.com/modules.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=4786&amp;mode=thread&amp;order=0&amp;thold=0" rel="nofollow">read this</a>.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=305947', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Armando Gomez</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/12/13/froomkin-flap/comment-page-1/#comment-305799</link>
		<dc:creator>Armando Gomez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 05:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=2853#comment-305799</guid>
		<description>Kabuki by Bush

December 13, 2005

In â€œBush says war killed 30,000 Iraqisâ€ by Nedra Pickler present President Bush as a character in a Japanese movie called Rashomon: Bush want to be seen in a positive light while everyone else sees differently.  Desperate to reverse his sinking approval rating, Bush attempts an unscripted presentation Kabuki-style, trying to come â€œcleanâ€ about the true estimation of Iraqi casualties.  That the World Affairs Council of Philadelphia Bush dropped the minimum body count of 30,000, hoping that public will be content with. Unfortunately, no one brought up The Lancet, a prestigious British medical journal, who estimated that about 100,000 Iraqi civilians had been killed in Iraq since it was invaded by a United States-led coalition in March 2003.  Itâ€™s no surprise that Bushâ€™s figures are way off since he had appointed Karen Hughes, undersecretary of state, to dispel anti-American sentiment around the world; sheâ€™s good company with Condi Rice.  His Iraqi government progress has also come into question; the Pentagonâ€™s paid journalists and news reports.  For his last Kabuki pass, Bush stated that if he knew what he knows now he would have still made the same decision to invade Iraq.  Whereâ€™s the trapdoor lever when you need one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kabuki by Bush</p>
<p>December 13, 2005</p>
<p>In â€œBush says war killed 30,000 Iraqisâ€ by Nedra Pickler present President Bush as a character in a Japanese movie called Rashomon: Bush want to be seen in a positive light while everyone else sees differently.  Desperate to reverse his sinking approval rating, Bush attempts an unscripted presentation Kabuki-style, trying to come â€œcleanâ€ about the true estimation of Iraqi casualties.  That the World Affairs Council of Philadelphia Bush dropped the minimum body count of 30,000, hoping that public will be content with. Unfortunately, no one brought up The Lancet, a prestigious British medical journal, who estimated that about 100,000 Iraqi civilians had been killed in Iraq since it was invaded by a United States-led coalition in March 2003.  Itâ€™s no surprise that Bushâ€™s figures are way off since he had appointed Karen Hughes, undersecretary of state, to dispel anti-American sentiment around the world; sheâ€™s good company with Condi Rice.  His Iraqi government progress has also come into question; the Pentagonâ€™s paid journalists and news reports.  For his last Kabuki pass, Bush stated that if he knew what he knows now he would have still made the same decision to invade Iraq.  Whereâ€™s the trapdoor lever when you need one.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=305799', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marie</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/12/13/froomkin-flap/comment-page-1/#comment-305749</link>
		<dc:creator>Marie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 05:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=2853#comment-305749</guid>
		<description>#14,nofreedom,
I believe I saw the same news piece as you.  
Years ago when the FBI infiltrated anti-Viet Nam war demonstrations, the public outrage about spying on American citizens was such that the practice was abandoned.  
There is no outrage now that will have a similar effect.  Anyone who objects to this government is subject to outrageous scrutiny and investigation, names go on the no-fly lists, and there is no end to what can and will be done with such lists. 
Civil liberties are threatened today as never before (in my memory) and people are apathetic -- it doesn&#039;t affect them (now) and the practice lives on.  
There is a poem called &quot;The Hangman&quot; by Maurice Ogden, which should be read by everyone as it applies today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#14,nofreedom,<br />
I believe I saw the same news piece as you.<br />
Years ago when the FBI infiltrated anti-Viet Nam war demonstrations, the public outrage about spying on American citizens was such that the practice was abandoned.<br />
There is no outrage now that will have a similar effect.  Anyone who objects to this government is subject to outrageous scrutiny and investigation, names go on the no-fly lists, and there is no end to what can and will be done with such lists.<br />
Civil liberties are threatened today as never before (in my memory) and people are apathetic &#8212; it doesn&#8217;t affect them (now) and the practice lives on.<br />
There is a poem called &#8220;The Hangman&#8221; by Maurice Ogden, which should be read by everyone as it applies today.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=305749', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dano347</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/12/13/froomkin-flap/comment-page-1/#comment-305512</link>
		<dc:creator>dano347</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 04:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=2853#comment-305512</guid>
		<description>Actually, it only sounds like a Bushism. It IS a word!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, it only sounds like a Bushism. It IS a word!<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=305512', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: afterthought</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/12/13/froomkin-flap/comment-page-1/#comment-305505</link>
		<dc:creator>afterthought</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 04:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=2853#comment-305505</guid>
		<description>#34,

Hee. Good one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#34,</p>
<p>Hee. Good one.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=305505', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dano347</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/12/13/froomkin-flap/comment-page-1/#comment-305500</link>
		<dc:creator>dano347</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 04:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=2853#comment-305500</guid>
		<description>&quot;illegalize&quot;?

Bush supporter?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;illegalize&#8221;?</p>
<p>Bush supporter?<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=305500', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: True American Hero</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/12/13/froomkin-flap/comment-page-1/#comment-305476</link>
		<dc:creator>True American Hero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 04:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=2853#comment-305476</guid>
		<description>Just wait till they illegalize blogging in Patriot Act 2.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wait till they illegalize blogging in Patriot Act 2.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=305476', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: afterthought</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/12/13/froomkin-flap/comment-page-1/#comment-305448</link>
		<dc:creator>afterthought</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 04:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=2853#comment-305448</guid>
		<description>Gee, I don&#039;t remember the WH having problem
with &quot;reporter&quot; Jeff Gannon, I wonder why?
As for Froomkin, the WH is confused about him?
Are they really admitting they are &lt;strong&gt;THAT&lt;/strong&gt; stupid?
I think not.
They just don&#039;t like the truth, and they never
have.
The press should &lt;strong&gt;ALWAYS&lt;/strong&gt; speak truth to power,
this spin crap has got to go, and the blogs 
are going to do it. 
I can see why WaPo is scared. 
The &quot;court stenographers&quot; are being
exposed.
&lt;strong&gt;GOOD!&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee, I don&#8217;t remember the WH having problem<br />
with &#8220;reporter&#8221; Jeff Gannon, I wonder why?<br />
As for Froomkin, the WH is confused about him?<br />
Are they really admitting they are <strong>THAT</strong> stupid?<br />
I think not.<br />
They just don&#8217;t like the truth, and they never<br />
have.<br />
The press should <strong>ALWAYS</strong> speak truth to power,<br />
this spin crap has got to go, and the blogs<br />
are going to do it.<br />
I can see why WaPo is scared.<br />
The &#8220;court stenographers&#8221; are being<br />
exposed.<br />
<strong>GOOD!</strong><a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=305448', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: idlecrank</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/12/13/froomkin-flap/comment-page-1/#comment-305390</link>
		<dc:creator>idlecrank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 03:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=2853#comment-305390</guid>
		<description>I find it really funny that the White House is all of a sudden concerned with who is or isn&#039;t a &quot;reporter.&quot; Must have something to do with that 38% approval rating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it really funny that the White House is all of a sudden concerned with who is or isn&#8217;t a &#8220;reporter.&#8221; Must have something to do with that 38% approval rating.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=305390', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: True American Hero</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/12/13/froomkin-flap/comment-page-1/#comment-305383</link>
		<dc:creator>True American Hero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 03:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=2853#comment-305383</guid>
		<description>So much complaining about nothing at all. They don&#039;t want their readers and yes the White House to get the wrong impression and think that this Froomkin character is a Post White House reporter. There&#039;s nothing wrong with that. His column should be labeled as what it is, opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So much complaining about nothing at all. They don&#8217;t want their readers and yes the White House to get the wrong impression and think that this Froomkin character is a Post White House reporter. There&#8217;s nothing wrong with that. His column should be labeled as what it is, opinion.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=305383', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Poor</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/12/13/froomkin-flap/comment-page-1/#comment-305346</link>
		<dc:creator>The Poor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 03:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=2853#comment-305346</guid>
		<description>You poor deluded wingnuts. You just don&#039;t have any clue about the massive political realignment this country is going through, do you? To you guys, it&#039;s going to be like living in FRANCE! Leave now! runaway! LMAO!



&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pennlive.com/newsflash/pa/index.ssf?/base/news-33/1134473942174530.xml&amp;storylist=penn&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;
Poll: Santorum&#039;s support of Bush hurts re-election prospects&lt;/a&gt;

HARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) â€” U.S. Sen. Rick Santorum&#039;s support of President Bush hurts his chances for re-election next year, Pennsylvania voters said by a 2-1 margin in a poll released Tuesday.

More than one-third of all Republicans surveyed in the Quinnipiac University poll also said Santorum&#039;s re-election prospects aren&#039;t helped by his support of the president.

The poll showed Democratic state Treasurer Robert P. Casey Jr. leading the two-term Republican incumbent by 50 percent to 38 percent in the 2006 Senate race, compared to a 52-to-34 percent lead in Quinnipiac&#039;s October poll. Voters also said they disapprove of Bush&#039;s job performance, 59 percent to 38 percent.

&quot;President Bush is clearly hurting Santorum in Pennsylvania, and he&#039;s still further behind than an incumbent should be entering the campaign year,&quot; said Clay Richards, assistant director of the Hamden, Conn., university&#039;s polling institute. &quot;Santorum&#039;s best hope is for a third-party abortion-rights candidate to emerge and pull Democratic votes from Casey.&quot;

The survey of 1,447 Pennsylvania voters was released one day after Santorum, the Senate&#039;s No. 3 Republican, attended a speech by Bush in Philadelphia that was part of the president&#039;s public relations campaign to promote Iraq war policies.

Santorum bypassed Bush&#039;s last stop in Pennsylvania, at Tobyhanna Army Depot in Monroe County on Nov. 11, citing a prior commitment in Philadelphia.

Santorum&#039;s approval rating rose, with 48 percent approving and 38 percent disapproving, up from 43 percent approving and 41 disapproving in October, the poll found.

Santorum was viewed favorably by 35 percent of the electorate, and Casey was viewed favorably by 40 percent, the poll found. But 34 percent said they did not yet know enough about Casey, the poll found.

Casey was viewed unfavorably by 6 percent of those surveyed compared to 28 percent who viewed Santorum unfavorably.

Casey is widely considered the Democratic front-runner in the race. The respondents were not asked about any other Democratic Senate primary candidates.

The telephone poll, conducted from Nov. 30 through Dec. 6, carries a sampling error margin of plus or minus 2.5 percentage points.

The poll also shows Democratic Gov. Ed Rendell maintaining a lead in hypothetical matchups against each of four Republicans seeking the GOP nomination for governor next year.

Rendell&#039;s lead is 29 percentage points over Jim Panyard, a former director of the Pennsylvania Manufacturers&#039; Association; 25 percentage points over state Sen. Jeffrey Piccola, R-Dauphin; 13 percentage points over former Pittsburgh Steeler Lynn Swann; and 12 percentage points over former Lt. Gov. William Scranton III.

Rendell&#039;s approval rating also improved to 51 percent from 46 percent in the university&#039;s October poll.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You poor deluded wingnuts. You just don&#8217;t have any clue about the massive political realignment this country is going through, do you? To you guys, it&#8217;s going to be like living in FRANCE! Leave now! runaway! LMAO!</p>
<blockquote><p><a href="http://www.pennlive.com/newsflash/pa/index.ssf?/base/news-33/1134473942174530.xml&amp;storylist=penn" rel="nofollow"><br />
Poll: Santorum&#8217;s support of Bush hurts re-election prospects</a></p>
<p>HARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) â€” U.S. Sen. Rick Santorum&#8217;s support of President Bush hurts his chances for re-election next year, Pennsylvania voters said by a 2-1 margin in a poll released Tuesday.</p>
<p>More than one-third of all Republicans surveyed in the Quinnipiac University poll also said Santorum&#8217;s re-election prospects aren&#8217;t helped by his support of the president.</p>
<p>The poll showed Democratic state Treasurer Robert P. Casey Jr. leading the two-term Republican incumbent by 50 percent to 38 percent in the 2006 Senate race, compared to a 52-to-34 percent lead in Quinnipiac&#8217;s October poll. Voters also said they disapprove of Bush&#8217;s job performance, 59 percent to 38 percent.</p>
<p>&#8220;President Bush is clearly hurting Santorum in Pennsylvania, and he&#8217;s still further behind than an incumbent should be entering the campaign year,&#8221; said Clay Richards, assistant director of the Hamden, Conn., university&#8217;s polling institute. &#8220;Santorum&#8217;s best hope is for a third-party abortion-rights candidate to emerge and pull Democratic votes from Casey.&#8221;</p>
<p>The survey of 1,447 Pennsylvania voters was released one day after Santorum, the Senate&#8217;s No. 3 Republican, attended a speech by Bush in Philadelphia that was part of the president&#8217;s public relations campaign to promote Iraq war policies.</p>
<p>Santorum bypassed Bush&#8217;s last stop in Pennsylvania, at Tobyhanna Army Depot in Monroe County on Nov. 11, citing a prior commitment in Philadelphia.</p>
<p>Santorum&#8217;s approval rating rose, with 48 percent approving and 38 percent disapproving, up from 43 percent approving and 41 disapproving in October, the poll found.</p>
<p>Santorum was viewed favorably by 35 percent of the electorate, and Casey was viewed favorably by 40 percent, the poll found. But 34 percent said they did not yet know enough about Casey, the poll found.</p>
<p>Casey was viewed unfavorably by 6 percent of those surveyed compared to 28 percent who viewed Santorum unfavorably.</p>
<p>Casey is widely considered the Democratic front-runner in the race. The respondents were not asked about any other Democratic Senate primary candidates.</p>
<p>The telephone poll, conducted from Nov. 30 through Dec. 6, carries a sampling error margin of plus or minus 2.5 percentage points.</p>
<p>The poll also shows Democratic Gov. Ed Rendell maintaining a lead in hypothetical matchups against each of four Republicans seeking the GOP nomination for governor next year.</p>
<p>Rendell&#8217;s lead is 29 percentage points over Jim Panyard, a former director of the Pennsylvania Manufacturers&#8217; Association; 25 percentage points over state Sen. Jeffrey Piccola, R-Dauphin; 13 percentage points over former Pittsburgh Steeler Lynn Swann; and 12 percentage points over former Lt. Gov. William Scranton III.</p>
<p>Rendell&#8217;s approval rating also improved to 51 percent from 46 percent in the university&#8217;s October poll.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=305346', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hawk</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/12/13/froomkin-flap/comment-page-1/#comment-305271</link>
		<dc:creator>Hawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 03:06:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=2853#comment-305271</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;
Old Danny-boy better start locking for a new job,the editor will be looking for a reason to fire him just to please ROVE &amp; HIS BUTT-BUDDY BUSH&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><br />
Old Danny-boy better start locking for a new job,the editor will be looking for a reason to fire him just to please ROVE &amp; HIS BUTT-BUDDY BUSH</strong><a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=305271', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Poor</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/12/13/froomkin-flap/comment-page-1/#comment-305259</link>
		<dc:creator>The Poor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 02:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=2853#comment-305259</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Newspaper subscriptions are failing for two reasons; the internet and the liberal bias that is endemic in the big city papers. Period. You can trust all but a few of the papers to print the liberal line. Period. Exclamation point. 

Comment by I-RIGHT-I â€” December 13, 2005&lt;/em&gt;

LOL! That&#039;s funny! Endemic. An interestingly ironic choice of expression. It says alot about where your sick mind is. I think it&#039;s endemic of living in the barnyard with your animal lovers.

&lt;em&gt;Main Entry: 1enÂ·demÂ·ic 
Pronunciation: en-&#039;de-mik, in-
Function: adjective
Etymology: French endÃ©mique, from endÃ©mie endemic disease, from Greek endEmia action of dwelling, from endEmos endemic, from en in + dEmos people, populace -- more at DEMAGOGUE
1 a : belonging or native to a particular people or country b : characteristic of or prevalent in a particular field, area, or environment  
2 : restricted or peculiar to a locality or region  
synonym see NATIVE

More at demÂ·aÂ·gogue 
Variant(s): or demÂ·aÂ·gog  /&#039;de-m&amp;-&quot;gÃ¤g/
Function: noun
Etymology: Greek dEmagOgos, from dEmos people (perhaps akin to Greek daiesthai to divide) + agOgos leading, from agein to lead -- more at TIDE, AGENT
1 : a leader who makes use of popular prejudices and false claims and promises in order to gain power
2 : a leader championing the cause of the common people in ancient times

Main Entry: 1naÂ·tive 
Pronunciation: &#039;nA-tiv
Function: adjective
Etymology: Middle English natif, from Middle French, from Latin nativus, from natus, past participle of nasci to be born -- more at NATION
1 : INBORN, INNATE 
2 : belonging to a particular place by birth 
3 archaic : closely related
4 : belonging to or associated with one by birth
5 : NATURAL, NORMAL
6 a : grown, produced, or originating in a particular place or in the vicinity : LOCAL b : living or growing naturally in a particular region : INDIGENOUS
7 : SIMPLE, UNAFFECTED
8 a : constituting the original substance or source b : found in nature especially in an unadulterated form 
9 chiefly Australian : having a usually superficial resemblance to a specified English plant or animal
- naÂ·tiveÂ·ly adverb
- naÂ·tiveÂ·ness noun
synonyms NATIVE, INDIGENOUS, ENDEMIC, ABORIGINAL mean belonging to a locality. NATIVE implies birth or origin in a place or region and may suggest compatibility with it . INDIGENOUS applies to species or races and adds to NATIVE the implication of not having been introduced from elsewhere . ENDEMIC implies being peculiar to a region . ABORIGINAL implies having no known race preceding in occupancy of the region . &lt;/em&gt;

You are fvcked and there isn&#039;t a damn thing you can do about it, except for blow up some more federal buildings. Good luck with that, winger!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Newspaper subscriptions are failing for two reasons; the internet and the liberal bias that is endemic in the big city papers. Period. You can trust all but a few of the papers to print the liberal line. Period. Exclamation point. </p>
<p>Comment by I-RIGHT-I â€” December 13, 2005</em></p>
<p>LOL! That&#8217;s funny! Endemic. An interestingly ironic choice of expression. It says alot about where your sick mind is. I think it&#8217;s endemic of living in the barnyard with your animal lovers.</p>
<p><em>Main Entry: 1enÂ·demÂ·ic<br />
Pronunciation: en-&#8217;de-mik, in-<br />
Function: adjective<br />
Etymology: French endÃ©mique, from endÃ©mie endemic disease, from Greek endEmia action of dwelling, from endEmos endemic, from en in + dEmos people, populace &#8212; more at DEMAGOGUE<br />
1 a : belonging or native to a particular people or country b : characteristic of or prevalent in a particular field, area, or environment<br />
2 : restricted or peculiar to a locality or region<br />
synonym see NATIVE</p>
<p>More at demÂ·aÂ·gogue<br />
Variant(s): or demÂ·aÂ·gog  /&#8217;de-m&amp;-&#8221;gÃ¤g/<br />
Function: noun<br />
Etymology: Greek dEmagOgos, from dEmos people (perhaps akin to Greek daiesthai to divide) + agOgos leading, from agein to lead &#8212; more at TIDE, AGENT<br />
1 : a leader who makes use of popular prejudices and false claims and promises in order to gain power<br />
2 : a leader championing the cause of the common people in ancient times</p>
<p>Main Entry: 1naÂ·tive<br />
Pronunciation: &#8216;nA-tiv<br />
Function: adjective<br />
Etymology: Middle English natif, from Middle French, from Latin nativus, from natus, past participle of nasci to be born &#8212; more at NATION<br />
1 : INBORN, INNATE<br />
2 : belonging to a particular place by birth<br />
3 archaic : closely related<br />
4 : belonging to or associated with one by birth<br />
5 : NATURAL, NORMAL<br />
6 a : grown, produced, or originating in a particular place or in the vicinity : LOCAL b : living or growing naturally in a particular region : INDIGENOUS<br />
7 : SIMPLE, UNAFFECTED<br />
8 a : constituting the original substance or source b : found in nature especially in an unadulterated form<br />
9 chiefly Australian : having a usually superficial resemblance to a specified English plant or animal<br />
- naÂ·tiveÂ·ly adverb<br />
- naÂ·tiveÂ·ness noun<br />
synonyms NATIVE, INDIGENOUS, ENDEMIC, ABORIGINAL mean belonging to a locality. NATIVE implies birth or origin in a place or region and may suggest compatibility with it . INDIGENOUS applies to species or races and adds to NATIVE the implication of not having been introduced from elsewhere . ENDEMIC implies being peculiar to a region . ABORIGINAL implies having no known race preceding in occupancy of the region . </em></p>
<p>You are fvcked and there isn&#8217;t a damn thing you can do about it, except for blow up some more federal buildings. Good luck with that, winger!<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=305259', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Heretik</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/12/13/froomkin-flap/comment-page-1/#comment-305256</link>
		<dc:creator>The Heretik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 02:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=2853#comment-305256</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;DANIEL IN THE WRITERS DEN&lt;/strong&gt;

 DANIEL UPSET THE RULERS of the kingdom and now Froomkin finds himself among the lions. Or the hyenas. Or the high and mighty political writers at the Washington Post. The writers may be high and might be mighty sorry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>DANIEL IN THE WRITERS DEN</strong></p>
<p> DANIEL UPSET THE RULERS of the kingdom and now Froomkin finds himself among the lions. Or the hyenas. Or the high and mighty political writers at the Washington Post. The writers may be high and might be mighty sorry<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=305256', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Poor</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/12/13/froomkin-flap/comment-page-1/#comment-305226</link>
		<dc:creator>The Poor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 02:44:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=2853#comment-305226</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Meyers never got far enough in the nomination process to even be considered in the Senate. You like â€œadvise and consentâ€ only when it suits you. Sit back and shut up, weâ€™ll tell you when itâ€™s your turn to pick Supreme Court Judgesâ€¦.yeahâ€¦make yourself real comfortable for the next twenty years or soâ€¦.loser. 

Comment by I-RIGHT-I â€” December 13, 2005 @ 9:21 pm&lt;/em&gt; 


Oh, if only the supreme court picked the nominees. That&#039;s the only plaxce your radical wingnuts will be in government for the next 20 years. Have you thought about moving to another country, since this one is far too liberal for you? Perhaps Germany in 1938 would suit you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Meyers never got far enough in the nomination process to even be considered in the Senate. You like â€œadvise and consentâ€ only when it suits you. Sit back and shut up, weâ€™ll tell you when itâ€™s your turn to pick Supreme Court Judgesâ€¦.yeahâ€¦make yourself real comfortable for the next twenty years or soâ€¦.loser. </p>
<p>Comment by I-RIGHT-I â€” December 13, 2005 @ 9:21 pm</em> </p>
<p>Oh, if only the supreme court picked the nominees. That&#8217;s the only plaxce your radical wingnuts will be in government for the next 20 years. Have you thought about moving to another country, since this one is far too liberal for you? Perhaps Germany in 1938 would suit you.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=305226', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rollotomasi</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/12/13/froomkin-flap/comment-page-1/#comment-305197</link>
		<dc:creator>rollotomasi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 02:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=2853#comment-305197</guid>
		<description>When a newspaper bases its coverage on what the covered think of that coverage, there is no free press.  Does WaPo management not know this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When a newspaper bases its coverage on what the covered think of that coverage, there is no free press.  Does WaPo management not know this?<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=305197', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I-RIGHT-I</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2005/12/13/froomkin-flap/comment-page-1/#comment-305168</link>
		<dc:creator>I-RIGHT-I</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 02:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=2853#comment-305168</guid>
		<description>Republicans in the Senate flip-flop on whether every nominee deserves an up or down vote - on one hand they were for it, but when extremist Republican activists soured on Harriet Miers, they decided they were against it. Now that the rightwing is popping Champagne corks for Samuel Alito, they are for it once again.
javascript:ol(â€™http://www.democrats.org/alitolettersâ€™); 

Comment by nofreedom!

Meyers never got far enough in the nomination process to even be considered in the Senate. You like &quot;advise and consent&quot; only when it suits you. Sit back and shut up, we&#039;ll tell you when it&#039;s your turn to pick Supreme Court Judges....yeah...make yourself real comfortable for the next twenty years or so....loser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republicans in the Senate flip-flop on whether every nominee deserves an up or down vote &#8211; on one hand they were for it, but when extremist Republican activists soured on Harriet Miers, they decided they were against it. Now that the rightwing is popping Champagne corks for Samuel Alito, they are for it once again.<br />
javascript:ol(â€™http://www.democrats.org/alitolettersâ€™); </p>
<p>Comment by nofreedom!</p>
<p>Meyers never got far enough in the nomination process to even be considered in the Senate. You like &#8220;advise and consent&#8221; only when it suits you. Sit back and shut up, we&#8217;ll tell you when it&#8217;s your turn to pick Supreme Court Judges&#8230;.yeah&#8230;make yourself real comfortable for the next twenty years or so&#8230;.loser.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=305168', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
