Bruce Fein,
By on Dec 20th, 2005 at 2:22 pm
Bruce Fein,
former Associate Deputy Attorney General under President Reagan: Bush is claiming “more power than King George III had at the time of the revolution, in asserting the theory that anything the president thinks is helpful to fighting the war against terrorism he can do.” Audio here.
View Most Popular
Advertisement
What We're About
What We're Fighting For
What We're Fighting Against
Featured
Subscribe to the Progress Report
Topic CloudView topics sorted by popularity
Afghanistan
Bachmann
Beck
Boehner
Bush
Business
Cheney
Civil Rights
Congress
Corporate Ethics
Dobbs
Economy
Education
Election
Energy
Environment
Ethics
Fox News
Gingrich
Glenn Beck
Global Warming
Health Care
Immigration
International Relations
Justice
LGBT
Lieberman
Limbaugh
Media
Military
O'Reilly
Obama
Palin
Pelosi
Politics
Race
Radical Right
Religion
Steele
Stimulus
Tea Parties
Tea Party
Terrorism
Veterans
Women's Rights
Visit Our Affiliated Sites
Reports
In-depth studies on select topics
Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.
ArchivesBlog Roll
If he’s lost Bruce Fein, he’s lost …
December 20th, 2005 at 2:25 pmAs this picks up speed, look for the ReichWingNutWackJobs to try and drown out all public discourse.
Here’s to John Conyers! May he and all those who stand against the Boy King be strong, be brave, and in the end win against these forces of evil who occupy the WhiteHouse.
“…First, I have introduced a resolution (H. Res. 635) creating a Select Committee with subpoena authority to investigate the misconduct of the Bush Administration with regard to the Iraq war and report on possible impeachable offenses. In Watergate, for example, the Congress did not begin matters as an impeachment inquiry, but investigated matters ? through the Ervin Committee ? and referred impeachable evidence to the Judiciary Committee.
Second, I have introduced Resolutions regarding both President Bush (H. Res. 636) and Vice-President Cheney (H. Res. 637) proposing that they be censured by Congress based on the uncontroverted evidence already on the record and their failure to respond to Congressional and public inquiries about these matters and have never accounted for their many specific misstatements in the run up to War…
[from: http://www.conyersblog.us/archives/00000328.htm ]
December 20th, 2005 at 2:32 pmKing Dumbya….has a nice ring to it…
December 20th, 2005 at 2:33 pmFeingold said it best (as usual)…He said why even have the Patriot Act, since Bush has now claimed that he has every and any power he deems necessary in the war on terror. Why pass a law–the PA–that the president is now claiming he doesn’t actually need to justify the things the law says he can do?
December 20th, 2005 at 2:41 pmA Republican who stands for a principle? I’ll never believe it.
December 20th, 2005 at 2:44 pmI am confident that if this administration is ever swept from office that we will find that they were using the NSA to fill Karl Rove and Dick Cheney’s bag of dirty tricks – after all they have consistantly said that if you disagree with them you are aiding terrorists, so in their twisted world they can wiretap anyone who disagrees with them.
December 20th, 2005 at 2:45 pmI think this may have caused some sleepless nights for some of the principled libertarian thinkers on the right. Fien is no lefty and if he is raising alarms, it is a good sign that there is more than just token resistance on the right to the executive overreach of the Dictatorial Chimp.
-GSD
December 20th, 2005 at 2:47 pmApril 20, 2004
President Bush: Information Sharing, Patriot Act Vital to Homeland Security
So the first thing I want you to think about is, when you hear Patriot Act, is that we changed the law and the bureaucratic mind-set to allow for the sharing of information. It’s vital. And others will describe what that means.
Secondly, there are such things as roving wiretaps. Now, by the way, any time you hear the United States government talking about wiretap, it requires — a wiretap requires a court order. Nothing has changed, by the way. When we’re talking about chasing down terrorists, we’re talking about getting a court order before we do so. It’s important for our fellow citizens to understand, when you think Patriot Act, constitutional guarantees are in place when it comes to doing what is necessary to protect our homeland, because we value the Constitution.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/r…20040420- 2.html
December 20th, 2005 at 2:48 pmIf it gets to the point of cleaning house I hope we get rid of William Krystol and the gang a PNAC as well. They are the seed of this depot. Great post in #2 regarding Conyers, he saw it coming.
December 20th, 2005 at 3:16 pmSo when are we going to start calling him King George IV?
December 20th, 2005 at 3:17 pmMaybe some other country will come over here and free us from the evil dictator. HA!
December 20th, 2005 at 3:55 pmhe’s more like a czar than a king… there are similarities:
http://blogdebogs.blogspot.com/2005/10/downfall-of-czar-george-ii.html
December 20th, 2005 at 4:21 pmHow do we get from here to seeing Bush’s day in court? We have two sides arguing a legal point to no end. Can’t there be a suit in a court for the debate and ultimate decision of legality? Or will this just end up being another devisive tennis match?
December 20th, 2005 at 4:25 pm#11 – I suggest that we call the French and ask them to liberate us. Seriously. They owe us a Big One and they know it.
I was visiting Pere Lachaise in Paris last month and struck up a conversation with the map vendor. He charged $2US for the map or $2EURO for the very same map. I asked why the price break for paying in US money. His reply: “Because we remember what you Americans did for us in 1945.”
December 20th, 2005 at 5:15 pmIn order to sue Bush in court over this you would have to find someone innocent who can claim damages. That wont be easy because Bush has been working the shredders overtime getting rid of all the evidence.
You can bet your bottom dollar that there were hundreds upon hundreds of people who did nothing to warrant a wiretap that were subjected to one.
Bush is too slick to leave evidence lying around like DeLay did.
December 20th, 2005 at 5:56 pm“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
– United States Constitution, Amendment IVâ€
The constitution trumps the patriot act, or presidential power – PERIOD!
December 20th, 2005 at 5:57 pmThe arrogance of W is just astonishing.
December 20th, 2005 at 6:17 pmhttp://dahrjamailiraq.com/index.php
Iraqis Glad 2005 Over, Dim Hopes for 2006
*Inter Press Service*
Dahr Jamail and Arkan Hamed
*BAGHDAD, Dec 20 (IPS) – Despite the parliamentary elections last week
and temporary ease in violence, Iraqis remain bitter about the outgoing
year, and sceptical of 2006.*
“As a doctor I usually travel daily from home to college,” said Um
Feras, a doctor of physics at Baghdad University who asked that her last
name be changed for her protection. “2005 was a terrible year, and now
it has become unacceptable for me to leave my house to go teach due to
the troops, who always where sunglasses even on gloomy days, aiming
their rifles at everyone like they are gangsters.”
The majority of Iraqis in Baghdad now fear the security forces, as
dozens of people each week are “disappeared” by police and soldiers
around the city and new torture chambers have been discovered recently.
Dr. Feras told IPS that the daily chaos on the streets of Baghdad, such
as closed roads and bridges, always caused her to be late, as well as
most of her students.
“Nothing is good in Iraq now,” said the doctor. “Torture, detained
friends, pillaging of houses, seeing neighbors suffering from poverty,
no electricity, no water and gun fights everywhere. We have no relief
from this suffering now.”
Electricity in Baghdad remains far below pre-war levels, with most
houses enjoying 3-5 hours per day. Meanwhile, oil exports in December
have sunk to a two-year low while up to 22 percent of the 21 billion
dollar set aside by the U.S. government for reconstruction projects in
Iraq has been diverted to security, according to Dan Speckhard, the
director of the Iraq reconstruction management office, who made the
announcement to reporters earlier this month.
Asked about her hopes and expectations for 2006, the doctor says: “I
only want a normal life far away from the interests of those bastards
who invaded our country. I don’t care about the elections and politics
and the new political parties because these are just a small part of the
strategy of the invaders.”
The doctor began to cry then added: “My dream for the coming year is
that the invaders pull out, we have Iraqis who love one another to
govern Iraq, we build something related to civilization and have
emotions towards our land and lives in order to get back to the
situation where each of us loves the other and we feel the good will of
God.”
She paused for reflection before saying, “But I can’t say this will happen.”
Other Iraqis, like 40 year-old leather worker Ismael Mohammed feel
similarly.
“2005 was worse than 2004 because the coalition forces are still
handling everything tightly in their hands and nothing has changed
except the faces of the governors,” he told IPS in Baghdad, “They are
trying to get everything they can from Iraq, meanwhile financially it is
getting worse, fuel [availability] is worse and the roads are worse.”
His feelings about the infrastructure are common around Baghdad, as Iraq
is suffering an unemployment rate of over 50 percent, oil exports remain
below pre-war levels, and the infrastructure remains in shambles amidst
the broken promises of the Bush Administration.
“Democracy? Where is our democracy?” asked Mohammed who said his best
day of 2005 was when one of his cousins was released from Abu Ghraib,
“Freedom? People shout with no one to hear. Everything goes with a bribe
now. You want to be a professor-easy, just give me the money and you are
a professor.”
Mohammed told IPS he remains sad and perplexed as to why his cousin was
recently killed. “We are Shia. Yet he was killed.”
And he asks: “Who profits from this constitution because we already had
one? Who is profiting from all of this? Iraqi leather used to be the
best all over the Middle East, but now it even seems as though the rain
has stopped falling in Iraq, as my trade has stopped growing. Now we
even have to import leather!”
According to the Institute for Policy Studies, a Washington-based think
tank, the value of Halliburton stock, U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney’s
old military company to which he still has financial ties, has increased
138 percent since March 2003. Halliburton has been awarded at least 10
billion dollar in contracts for their operations in Iraq.
Meanwhile, U.S. citizens aren’t benefiting from the occupation either.
The average monthly cost of the Iraq war for the U.S. is 5.6 billion
dollar for a total of over 225 billion dollar thus far, pushing their
national debt over 8 trillion dollar, according to the U.S. Department
of Treasury. For 2006, Mohammed voiced the dreams of many Iraqis.
“To get rid of the invaders and have God give back blessings to the
people of Iraq,” Mohammed told IPS. “We want good people in positions of
authority who will compensate Iraqis who have suffered. I would like to
see Iraqis work as one unit, putting the good of the country ahead of
divisions between them and to go on dealing as humans.”
Mohammed added: “We need a lot of work to obtain true sovereignty and to
December 20th, 2005 at 9:49 pmcure the problems brought by the invaders, as independence isn’t so easy
that we can get it in one year. Democracy cannot be given as simple as
that; we have to work hard for it and educate people to get it.”
Article 1 Section 8 says Congress has the power to make rules about military facilites — like NSA — so, FISA is constitutional.
If the House refuses to act, there’s a method for the States to issue a proclomation, triggering an investigation — this without the House Judiciary Committee having any say. This House rule was successfully tested in 1903 with Florida’s proclomation. [More at the link under my name.]
January 22nd, 2006 at 10:16 pm