I’m just thankful that something that this administration did wrong is finally getting some attention. They have seemed to have dogged the WMD lies, The Valerie Plame leak, torturing detainees, Abu Ghraib and all of the little ’stunts’ Rove pulls to threaten Journalists from reportering on them. My only complaint is that I want this process to speed along. I want hearings next week.. and I want the Preznit to have lost all of his political power by the following week. The sooner we get a lame duck president.. the sooner we can stop this madman from destroying our country.
Sure as f*ck she’s not the only one. Whatever NBC are making inquiries about, it’s a goddamn certainty one of their lot suspects (s)he got bugged.
Let’s also not forget Chimp was up for bombing Al Jazeera, so why would he give a f*ck about eavesdropping on journalists… especially one married to a former Clinton official.
If the 4th Estate has any f*cking cojones, they can draw up the charge sheet to put these criminals out of business. I still predict Bolton will be fall-guy when the sh*t hits the fan, but if he’s got the Abramoff gene, he might just rat out the whole stinking gang of thieves.
That Christiana Amanpour is married to Jamie Rubin, who has connections to the Democrats and Clinton/Gore; that Amanpour is not a cheerleader for Bush&Co, but instead has always presented the facts and news of Iraq with little or no apparent bias, is more than reason enough for the Bushies to want her phones tapped.
Mitchell may have spoke prematurely yesterday in her MSNBC interview with Risen, but it is encouraging to learn that NBC is investigting the issue.
When journalists are themselves victims of unwarranted spying, the public may receive the ultimate benefit.
You guys are all ignoring the more incredible fact–that they deleted that reference from the transcript. Investigation or not, why did NBC choose to remove Mitchell’s question? This smells SO much more like a coverup/whitewash than any kind of “investigation”…
By the way, how could NBC even investigate? Isn’t everything double-secret-probation classified? How in hell would they get their mitts on anything substantial?
Well folks, you all dont have very long to do something about the corrupt government.
Prior to the 2006 mid-terms Bush will declare martial law and disband congress. He cannot afford to wait and see how the elections come out because he knows, Rove has told him, that they are going to lose control of congress. That would mean immediate impeachment proceeding in Jan. 2007.
If Alito is put on SCOTUS it makes all of Bushlandias actions legal, so it is imperative he be kept off the court. If he is, Bush has the answer. Disband the Supreme Court also.
Well, I had my picture taken by the FBI back in the 70’s when I protested the Vietnam War and I suspect there is a file on me now. Hope they keep good notes, cause when the war crimes trials are held, I sure don’t want to be counted among the collaborators with this criminal facist government.
bush is a freaking pyscho! he pulled wings off of baby birds and shit! christ how can this guy be president! i propose this administration be shut down from appointing or nominating any further supreme court judges, or any government official until the plame affair, nsa wiretaps, the torture shit, etc, is completed. to let this full blown maniac make appointments that will lasts decades if surely insane! god or somebody help us!
This pisses me off. Why is NBC changing a transcript? A transcript is supposed to be an historical document of what was said. Not what was meant to be said, and is no subject to modification at the whim of the source to remove certain information. This is like “History – Version 2.0″ in my book! Big Brother is alive and well if we are letting the White House and now NBC to get away with modifying history.
#17 – the altering of the script might just be NBC keeping shtum about what they hope will be a major scoop. And I think you can argue that now they have admitted to following this story, they’ll actually more likely to air it in time.
But the intersting angle for me is that Jamie Rubin was a Kerry consultant… I didn’t actually know that, just knew he had worked for Clinton.
I recall a certain other Kerry foreign policy consultant who the Bushies got mad at… a certain Joe Wilson. And we all know what happened to his wife.
For me, this confirms that Bush’s motivation for illegally spying on US citizens is politically motivated. It was not, as he’d like us to believe, for our own protection.
Correct me if I’m wrong, but weren’t these the same reasons Nixon did what he did?
In the meantime, anyone notice that Iraq is now in a civil war? How many more bombings can they have without the MSM waking up to this simple, clear, glaring fact? From the AP newservice:
… The two-day toll from insurgent attacks rose to 163, reflecting a dramatic upsurge in bloodshed following the Dec. 15 parliamentary elections…
#19 JC – It just about proves that the purpose of the wiretaps was/is to spy on political enemies; it has to be obvious to anyone not among the deluded 37%. Just the utter stupidity of that statement Bush made the other day: “If al Quaeda is calling you, we want to know why.” Boy, I feel safer now. Everything they do is aimed at political enemies and holding on to power.
#12, wow. These people wield a lot of power in a wildly irresponsible way, but they can’t shut down the other two branches of government. Then there’d be blood in the streets.
First, NBC censors Kanye West for telling the truth last year, now they’re censoring the truth on whether Christiane
Amanpour may be in danger from a reich-wing administration.
Nice going NBC. At least you haven’t censored Keith Olbermann, yet.
True Blue, #20, you almost made me spit my lunch out onto my keyboard! COL!(Choke out loud?) As soon as I had seen the “Correct me…” line, I scrolled down to see if it was Joe, and was surprised to see that it wasn’t. Where is Joe, anyway? He’s always got funny and interesting things to say.
#27 – you are correct. Amanpour is married to Rubin. But, it would be a direct conflict of interest for Christie and Rubin to discuss Kerry’s campaign so this disclosure could be very damaging for CNN.
Of course, this all highly speculative.
As for NBC reasons for censoring this info, Andrea Mitchell has a habit of making bold accusations and incriminating herself. If Christie was wiretapped and Mitchell blurts it out on tv, she becomes a witness. It is already highly likely that she will be subponeaed in Scooter Libby’s trial.
If I was the Bush administration I’d bug Larry King. He’s just creepy.
January 5th, 2006 at 7:31 amThings are getting pretty bad when something like this dosen’t even shock me anymore. The lunacy has to stop!
January 5th, 2006 at 7:37 amI’m just thankful that something that this administration did wrong is finally getting some attention. They have seemed to have dogged the WMD lies, The Valerie Plame leak, torturing detainees, Abu Ghraib and all of the little ’stunts’ Rove pulls to threaten Journalists from reportering on them. My only complaint is that I want this process to speed along. I want hearings next week.. and I want the Preznit to have lost all of his political power by the following week. The sooner we get a lame duck president.. the sooner we can stop this madman from destroying our country.
January 5th, 2006 at 8:05 amClicked the link and was greeted with an ad for Justice Sunday…
January 5th, 2006 at 8:19 amSure as f*ck she’s not the only one. Whatever NBC are making inquiries about, it’s a goddamn certainty one of their lot suspects (s)he got bugged.
Let’s also not forget Chimp was up for bombing Al Jazeera, so why would he give a f*ck about eavesdropping on journalists… especially one married to a former Clinton official.
If the 4th Estate has any f*cking cojones, they can draw up the charge sheet to put these criminals out of business. I still predict Bolton will be fall-guy when the sh*t hits the fan, but if he’s got the Abramoff gene, he might just rat out the whole stinking gang of thieves.
January 5th, 2006 at 8:26 amThe US government will always scare me more than Islamo- terrorists. No doubt about it.
January 5th, 2006 at 8:34 amThose bastards have been bugging me for over five years.
January 5th, 2006 at 9:02 amno surprises here… she’s a member of the liberal media, and also of Middle Eastern descent… I’m surprised Bush hasn’t had her tortured…
“If Christiane Amanpour is calling you, we’d like to know why.”
this is some seriously Nixonian shit here… he’s not just looking for terrorists, he’s looking for all ideological enemies…
January 5th, 2006 at 9:38 amThat Christiana Amanpour is married to Jamie Rubin, who has connections to the Democrats and Clinton/Gore; that Amanpour is not a cheerleader for Bush&Co, but instead has always presented the facts and news of Iraq with little or no apparent bias, is more than reason enough for the Bushies to want her phones tapped.
January 5th, 2006 at 9:46 amMitchell may have spoke prematurely yesterday in her MSNBC interview with Risen, but it is encouraging to learn that NBC is investigting the issue.
When journalists are themselves victims of unwarranted spying, the public may receive the ultimate benefit.
You guys are all ignoring the more incredible fact–that they deleted that reference from the transcript. Investigation or not, why did NBC choose to remove Mitchell’s question? This smells SO much more like a coverup/whitewash than any kind of “investigation”…
By the way, how could NBC even investigate? Isn’t everything double-secret-probation classified? How in hell would they get their mitts on anything substantial?
January 5th, 2006 at 9:50 amWhen Will This Madness End
It’s Way, Way, Way Past Time To Jail the Bush Gangsters
They R Killing People and USA Democracy, DEAD
Free 4 U 2 Copy Anti Bush Protest Images at…
http://www.RogerART.com
Pass Em On…
January 5th, 2006 at 9:54 amWell folks, you all dont have very long to do something about the corrupt government.
Prior to the 2006 mid-terms Bush will declare martial law and disband congress. He cannot afford to wait and see how the elections come out because he knows, Rove has told him, that they are going to lose control of congress. That would mean immediate impeachment proceeding in Jan. 2007.
If Alito is put on SCOTUS it makes all of Bushlandias actions legal, so it is imperative he be kept off the court. If he is, Bush has the answer. Disband the Supreme Court also.
Think not? Wait and see.
January 5th, 2006 at 9:59 amWell, I had my picture taken by the FBI back in the 70’s when I protested the Vietnam War and I suspect there is a file on me now. Hope they keep good notes, cause when the war crimes trials are held, I sure don’t want to be counted among the collaborators with this criminal facist government.
January 5th, 2006 at 10:06 amIf it’s NBC, be very skeptical about any “investigation”.
January 5th, 2006 at 10:08 ambush is a freaking pyscho! he pulled wings off of baby birds and shit! christ how can this guy be president! i propose this administration be shut down from appointing or nominating any further supreme court judges, or any government official until the plame affair, nsa wiretaps, the torture shit, etc, is completed. to let this full blown maniac make appointments that will lasts decades if surely insane! god or somebody help us!
January 5th, 2006 at 10:15 amMarie,
Jamie Rubin doesn’t just have connections to Dems and Clinton/Gore. He was John Kerry’s Foreign Policy Advisor on the Kerry Campaign in 2004.
January 5th, 2006 at 10:37 amThis pisses me off. Why is NBC changing a transcript? A transcript is supposed to be an historical document of what was said. Not what was meant to be said, and is no subject to modification at the whim of the source to remove certain information. This is like “History – Version 2.0″ in my book! Big Brother is alive and well if we are letting the White House and now NBC to get away with modifying history.
January 5th, 2006 at 10:44 am#17 – the altering of the script might just be NBC keeping shtum about what they hope will be a major scoop. And I think you can argue that now they have admitted to following this story, they’ll actually more likely to air it in time.
But the intersting angle for me is that Jamie Rubin was a Kerry consultant… I didn’t actually know that, just knew he had worked for Clinton.
I recall a certain other Kerry foreign policy consultant who the Bushies got mad at… a certain Joe Wilson. And we all know what happened to his wife.
January 5th, 2006 at 11:01 amFor me, this confirms that Bush’s motivation for illegally spying on US citizens is politically motivated. It was not, as he’d like us to believe, for our own protection.
Correct me if I’m wrong, but weren’t these the same reasons Nixon did what he did?
In the meantime, anyone notice that Iraq is now in a civil war? How many more bombings can they have without the MSM waking up to this simple, clear, glaring fact? From the AP newservice:
… The two-day toll from insurgent attacks rose to 163, reflecting a dramatic upsurge in bloodshed following the Dec. 15 parliamentary elections…
January 5th, 2006 at 11:20 amCorrect me if I’m wrong, but weren’t these the same reasons Nixon did what he did? comment by JCGOW
Hey, JC,
January 5th, 2006 at 11:41 amDid you ask Joe Sixpack for permission to use his tag line?
;-)
NBC News: don’t ask, don’t transcribe
If (Amanpour) was wiretapped … it would give more credence to the Wayne Madsen scenario…
January 5th, 2006 at 11:41 am#20 – :-)
January 5th, 2006 at 11:47 am#19 JC – It just about proves that the purpose of the wiretaps was/is to spy on political enemies; it has to be obvious to anyone not among the deluded 37%. Just the utter stupidity of that statement Bush made the other day: “If al Quaeda is calling you, we want to know why.” Boy, I feel safer now. Everything they do is aimed at political enemies and holding on to power.
#12, wow. These people wield a lot of power in a wildly irresponsible way, but they can’t shut down the other two branches of government. Then there’d be blood in the streets.
January 5th, 2006 at 12:14 pmpardon my ignorance, but what is the wayne madsen scenario?
January 5th, 2006 at 12:21 pmFirst, NBC censors Kanye West for telling the truth last year, now they’re censoring the truth on whether Christiane
Amanpour may be in danger from a reich-wing administration.
Nice going NBC. At least you haven’t censored Keith Olbermann, yet.
January 5th, 2006 at 12:56 pmTrue Blue, #20, you almost made me spit my lunch out onto my keyboard! COL!(Choke out loud?) As soon as I had seen the “Correct me…” line, I scrolled down to see if it was Joe, and was surprised to see that it wasn’t. Where is Joe, anyway? He’s always got funny and interesting things to say.
January 5th, 2006 at 1:59 pm#16 NLCD, I may be mistaken, but I think Rubin was in the Clinton/Gore administration in the state department.
January 5th, 2006 at 3:55 pm#27 – you are correct. Amanpour is married to Rubin. But, it would be a direct conflict of interest for Christie and Rubin to discuss Kerry’s campaign so this disclosure could be very damaging for CNN.
Of course, this all highly speculative.
As for NBC reasons for censoring this info, Andrea Mitchell has a habit of making bold accusations and incriminating herself. If Christie was wiretapped and Mitchell blurts it out on tv, she becomes a witness. It is already highly likely that she will be subponeaed in Scooter Libby’s trial.
January 5th, 2006 at 4:16 pm#28, something like CNN pundit and Democrat wonk, James Carville being married to Cheney’s aide and WHIG member, Mary Matalin?
January 5th, 2006 at 5:58 pm