have any of you heard about this and if so, where can i find this information?

Get your head out of the dirt. It’s not about Clinton it’s about spying King George II. Gosh, just think how many, many more places that money could have been spent to help people with no health insurance because of the policies of this corrupt administration or other causes. Causes such as child care for foster care for babies no Repulsives will adopt. Let alone I’m sure there are still some millionaires that need some more tax relief which that money could go to. Heck, W could just write them a check.

It’s so easy to talk the talk: No Child left behind, Family values, ad nausem…… Not even King George can connect all the dots he has left in his quest to be the most corrupt leader in our nation’s history.

W you’re doing a heck of a job. IMPEACH BUSH

Steve, you’re doing a heckuva job….

Comment by WORFEUS #68

Right on Worfeus,

They drive me up a friggin’ wall with that sh*t…

He’s got to be a plant!

Why is Democratic Strategist Steve McMahon saying on Hardball that the Abramoff scandal is not that bad, and that it’s really only a handful of people?

Why is a Democratic Strategist downplaying the importance and seriousness of the Abramoff scandal?

The only answer I can assume, is he is really a double agent, or the Democrats are gluttons for punishment, and just want to keep on losing.

Why is this guy still talking on Harball? Why was’nt he fired after he got everything wrong in 04?

Steve McMahon is the Democrats version of Mike Brown.

Steve, you’re doing a heckuva job….

Please don’t give him to us. I know the good progressives of Missouri don’t want him, but we Michiganians won’t take him off your hands.

Comment by I-RIGHT-I #64

I’gnorant-R’odent-I’mbecile,

For inbreds like yourself “knowing” that “Blue” states are more populous, more productive, and have more educated populations would be pretty upsetting facts…

First line in the Cundtoleeza for prez song…

hahahahahahahahahhahhhaaaa!!!!!

Nonsense. All one really needs to know about “Blue” states is that they habitually vote in liberal Democrats. One should conclude from this fact alone that those voters who hold the majority in that state are morally corrupt, ignorant lemmings and are willing accomplices of the radical Left and their demented programs for this country.

BSR blabbed some more: “Exhibit B: the demands of Rep. William Jefferson (D-LA) to be paid for his support of a telecommuniations deal.” — If, indeed William Jefferson accepted bribes, then he should be indicted. As it currently stands, it is a former aide of Jefferson, Brett Pfeffer, who is awaiting trial on bribery charges. As stated above in regards to Reid, if evidence comes to light that Jefferson accepted bribes or broke the law, then he should be indicted and brought to justice.

BSR succumbing to swamp fever, blabbed some more: “Reid and Jefferson should be held to the same standard as any other politician, yet their partisan allies continue to defend them.” — Agreed, neither have been indicted for a crime. Any citizen, with just a bit of common sense and love for America, would agree that a politician who commits criminal acts, regardless of political party affiliation, is a danger to this country and our freedoms, and as such, he or she should be removed from office and be brought to justice.

It’s unfortunate that you continue to make broad-based claims and assumptions that are not founded in facts. Take for instance your statement: “As you can see, the right side of the blogosphere holds conservative politicians to a much higher ethical standard, compared with the standards imposed on liberal politicians by the bloggers on the Left.” How does a single Hugh Hewitt “humorous” questionnaire prove that conservative politicians and right-leaning blogs hold the current crop of Republicans to a higher standard? You are making quite a large leap of logic in making such a statement.

Take a moment to walk around that “Blue” state you live in and you will find that your prejudices are quite possibly unjustified, as most people don’t resemble the extreme caricatures you paint them to be. I, for one, could care less about these labels and arbitrary political distinctions you use as a basis for you assumptions and arguments. You already have made your decision on matters and only look to find facts that support your views, whereas a rational person forms their views from the facts. This extreme bias you hold is affecting your ability to see things objectively. You should really quit hanging out in this “fever swamp,” it’s affecting your mental faculties.

Last Independent Counsel Report Set For ‘Release’; Focus On Clinton Administration
Sun Jan 15 2006 19:35:32 2006

In Monday’s edition of the NEW YORK SUN, reporter Brian McGuire and contributor R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr., break the first look at the long-anticipated report from Independent Counsel David Barrett, whose investigation lasted 10 year and cost taxpayers $23 million.

The SUN outlines the report’s details surrounding the alleged illicit activity and cover up that involving former Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Henry Cisneros before and during his time in the Clinton Administration.

The Sun reveals that the Barrett report connects the dots that allege that senior officials of the Clinton Administration hindered investigations by the IRS in both Texas and Washington, as well as the investigations of a grand jury examining the independent counsel’s evidence.

The full report, more than 400 pages line, with more than 100 pages of redacted material, hits the street on Thursday morning at 9 am.

Democrats in the House and Senate have been fighting for months to block the release of the report and keep the 100 pages of highly damaging redacted material from ever seeing the light of day.

Developing…

Now I know the left loves “free speech” (sometimes!) and they often note that “money is not speech” so let EVERYONE welcome this stance to rid our system of ALL “special interest” money!!!

OK, now I ready to be called a mysoginist b#t$h by those who CANNOT argue an issue…

However, in a manner reminiscent of the Miers nomination, there are conservatives out there who are pushing for a thorough “house cleaning” (pun intended). See, for example, the questionnaire composed by Hugh Hewitt for completion by all leadership applicants (posted at http://www.hughhewitt.com on January 15, 2006, at 07:48 AM PST):

[WARNING: Sense of Humor Required]

[BEGIN EXCERPT]

Job Application for all GOP Conference Leadership Positions
by Hugh Hewitt

Thank you for applying for the position of Majority Leader. Please return this completed form to NZ Bear.

Part I. The Money Stuff

1. Does Jack Abramoff have your cell-phone number in his Blackberry?

____. Yes. (You may skip the rest of the questions.)

____. No.

2. Did you have signature privileges at Signatures restaurant?

____. Yes. (That’s it. You’re done. And you might want to get
a lawyer.)

____. No.

3. In the last four years, have you accepted greater than $10,000
in campaign contributions from Abramoff clients?

_____. Yes. (Thank you, that will be all. We know it isn’t fair,
but elections aren’t fair.)

_____. No. (Are you sure about that?)

4. Did you take any trip anywhere in the past four years that
involved more than three rounds of golf?

____. Yes. (Sorry, you are out. Unless you were golfing in
Israel or on a military base.)

____. No. (Please attach a sheet explaining what you have against
golf.)

5. Please attach a separate sheet listing the earmarks you have
inserted in appropriations bills since your career began.
If you need two sheets, don’t bother.

6. Prior to the decision to move forward, did you support Duncan
Hunter’s proposal to bring Congressman Murtha’s defeat
an retreat resolution to the floor?

____. Yes.

____. No. (Who are you kidding? Get out now.)

7. Please list all relatives and their sources of income.

8. Do you have “K Street Project” tattooed on your ankle?

Part II. The Sex Stuff.

We don’t want to know. But if the Post does, then drop out now.

Part III. The Brains Stuff

Ask your best friend in the caucus. The one who offers you the breath mint all the time.

Then tell us your plans for 2006.

Part IV. The Media Stuff

Please attach a video file of your three best appearances on television. We’ll be the judge of that.

Thank you for your interest. We’ll be in touch.

[END EXCERPT]

This is humor with a purpose. As you can see, the right side of the blogosphere holds conservative politicians to a much higher ethical standard, compared with the standards imposed on liberal politicians by the bloggers on the Left. Exhibit A: not one liberal has demanded that Sen. Harry Reid (D-NV) return his Abramoff-tainted money – which he publicly has refused to do. Exhibit B: the demands of Rep. William Jefferson (D-LA) to be paid for his support of a telecommuniations deal.

Reid and Jefferson should be held to the same standard as any other politician, yet their partisan allies continue to defend them. Democrats are about to shoot themselves in the foot again on this issue. Just wait and see.