<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Big Oil Doesn&#8217;t Want You To Know About Biofuels</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/25/big-oil-biofuels/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/25/big-oil-biofuels/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 23:30:42 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: bilmar</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/25/big-oil-biofuels/comment-page-3/#comment-1249558</link>
		<dc:creator>bilmar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 09:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/25/big-oil-biofuels/#comment-1249558</guid>
		<description>what can you say about the economic effects that the biofuels brought to us</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what can you say about the economic effects that the biofuels brought to us<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=1249558', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremiah</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/25/big-oil-biofuels/comment-page-3/#comment-529394</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremiah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Apr 2006 01:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/25/big-oil-biofuels/#comment-529394</guid>
		<description>This biofuels argument approaches the ridiculous for a reason that seems to be completely omitted from the discussion:

Biofuels are produced from biological material -- plants and plant products, typically. These plants have to come from somewhere, and in most of the world, that&#039;s a monoculture farming operation. Operations on the scale required to provide a 1 for 1 swap on energy sources from oil to ethanol and biodiesel would be absolutely enormous. Assuming that were done, the way we do farming requires a lot of fertilizer. And where does the nitrogen in most fertilizer products come from? Petrochemicals -- Oil. So while the process is cleaner in the emissions sense, it is still ultimately a petrochemical product. You cannot simply make a counter-argument like &quot;use another source&quot; or &quot;do it organically&quot; without first having a sense of the scale this would require.

Further, with the increase in demand these fuels would place on farm markets, does that mean that there would develop an economic calculus that determines the &lt;strong&gt;choice between feeding people and cars&lt;/strong&gt; in times of depressed global crop production?

The real choice is not about energy use, but about lifestyle itself. Those of us in the west, Europe and especially North America need to drop cars. Move into town, live densely and close together, use bicycles and slow down the pace of our lives. It seems to work for the places in the world that have adopted it.

This isn&#039;t an technical issue, ultimately, it&#039;s a choice we&#039;re going to make about the way our lives will be lied now and in the future. Because your choices now can affect generations, you really are making a decision for other people. You need to be very clear about what kind of world you want to hand your children based on careful consideration of actual facts, not wishes and poorly understood technofixes.

Good luck, and Goodnight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This biofuels argument approaches the ridiculous for a reason that seems to be completely omitted from the discussion:</p>
<p>Biofuels are produced from biological material &#8212; plants and plant products, typically. These plants have to come from somewhere, and in most of the world, that&#8217;s a monoculture farming operation. Operations on the scale required to provide a 1 for 1 swap on energy sources from oil to ethanol and biodiesel would be absolutely enormous. Assuming that were done, the way we do farming requires a lot of fertilizer. And where does the nitrogen in most fertilizer products come from? Petrochemicals &#8212; Oil. So while the process is cleaner in the emissions sense, it is still ultimately a petrochemical product. You cannot simply make a counter-argument like &#8220;use another source&#8221; or &#8220;do it organically&#8221; without first having a sense of the scale this would require.</p>
<p>Further, with the increase in demand these fuels would place on farm markets, does that mean that there would develop an economic calculus that determines the <strong>choice between feeding people and cars</strong> in times of depressed global crop production?</p>
<p>The real choice is not about energy use, but about lifestyle itself. Those of us in the west, Europe and especially North America need to drop cars. Move into town, live densely and close together, use bicycles and slow down the pace of our lives. It seems to work for the places in the world that have adopted it.</p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t an technical issue, ultimately, it&#8217;s a choice we&#8217;re going to make about the way our lives will be lied now and in the future. Because your choices now can affect generations, you really are making a decision for other people. You need to be very clear about what kind of world you want to hand your children based on careful consideration of actual facts, not wishes and poorly understood technofixes.</p>
<p>Good luck, and Goodnight.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=529394', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: unbelievable</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/25/big-oil-biofuels/comment-page-3/#comment-428542</link>
		<dc:creator>unbelievable</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2006 17:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/25/big-oil-biofuels/#comment-428542</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;I envy you your ability to live the spartan lifeâ€¦ 

Comment by big papa â€” January 26, 2006 @ 12:54 pm &lt;/em&gt;

It&#039;s like anything - just one day at a time :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>I envy you your ability to live the spartan lifeâ€¦ </p>
<p>Comment by big papa â€” January 26, 2006 @ 12:54 pm </em></p>
<p>It&#8217;s like anything &#8211; just one day at a time :)<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=428542', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: unbelievable</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/25/big-oil-biofuels/comment-page-3/#comment-428540</link>
		<dc:creator>unbelievable</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2006 17:06:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/25/big-oil-biofuels/#comment-428540</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Sounds like a lot of common sense. I too, would like to change my life: Can you state some books or websites that have pointers about this? 

Comment by realist67 â€” January 26, 2006 @ 12:01 pm &lt;/em&gt;

Sorry for the delay, I&#039;ve been trying to teach a troll that the reflection in the mirror is his...  after all, they teach chimps to do it...  much easier with an ape than a troll.

Gee, I guess I just started making small incremental changes.  Not sure about books or websites to suggest.

But turning off the television, especially during commericals makes a huge difference.  

I guess just think about where you spend you money, and how you could cut back, or find it cheaper.  You&#039;re right - most of it is common sense.

Good luck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Sounds like a lot of common sense. I too, would like to change my life: Can you state some books or websites that have pointers about this? </p>
<p>Comment by realist67 â€” January 26, 2006 @ 12:01 pm </em></p>
<p>Sorry for the delay, I&#8217;ve been trying to teach a troll that the reflection in the mirror is his&#8230;  after all, they teach chimps to do it&#8230;  much easier with an ape than a troll.</p>
<p>Gee, I guess I just started making small incremental changes.  Not sure about books or websites to suggest.</p>
<p>But turning off the television, especially during commericals makes a huge difference.  </p>
<p>I guess just think about where you spend you money, and how you could cut back, or find it cheaper.  You&#8217;re right &#8211; most of it is common sense.</p>
<p>Good luck!<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=428540', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cornboy</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/25/big-oil-biofuels/comment-page-3/#comment-424867</link>
		<dc:creator>cornboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2006 17:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/25/big-oil-biofuels/#comment-424867</guid>
		<description>#138 what foolish comment?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#138 what foolish comment?<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=424867', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/25/big-oil-biofuels/comment-page-3/#comment-424661</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2006 16:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/25/big-oil-biofuels/#comment-424661</guid>
		<description>Please read the article before making foolish comments. They are talking about cellulose ethanol from crop waste and Prairie grasses not corn starch! Using Hemp cellulose would make sense after we replaced cotton fabric and wood paper with hemp cloth and paper. Using hemp seed for biodiesel is idiotic. Hemp seed is one of the best sources of Omega-3 fatty acids available. Switchgrass is a Great Plains perennial Prairie grass that requires very little watter, no pesticides, and little fertilizer. It grows where corn fails and you cut it and it grows back, just like your lawn, but it can produce twice the ethanol per acre as corn can according to DOE and USDA experts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please read the article before making foolish comments. They are talking about cellulose ethanol from crop waste and Prairie grasses not corn starch! Using Hemp cellulose would make sense after we replaced cotton fabric and wood paper with hemp cloth and paper. Using hemp seed for biodiesel is idiotic. Hemp seed is one of the best sources of Omega-3 fatty acids available. Switchgrass is a Great Plains perennial Prairie grass that requires very little watter, no pesticides, and little fertilizer. It grows where corn fails and you cut it and it grows back, just like your lawn, but it can produce twice the ethanol per acre as corn can according to DOE and USDA experts.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=424661', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cornboy</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/25/big-oil-biofuels/comment-page-3/#comment-424520</link>
		<dc:creator>cornboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2006 15:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/25/big-oil-biofuels/#comment-424520</guid>
		<description>http://rael.berkeley.edu/EBAMM/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://rael.berkeley.edu/EBAMM/" rel="nofollow">http://rael.berkeley.edu/EBAMM/</a><a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=424520', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cornboy</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/25/big-oil-biofuels/comment-page-3/#comment-424519</link>
		<dc:creator>cornboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2006 15:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/25/big-oil-biofuels/#comment-424519</guid>
		<description>Ethanol Study    &lt;a href=&quot;http://rael.berkeley.edu/EBAMM/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ethanol Study    <a href="http://rael.berkeley.edu/EBAMM/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=424519', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Parker</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/25/big-oil-biofuels/comment-page-3/#comment-423190</link>
		<dc:creator>Parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2006 21:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/25/big-oil-biofuels/#comment-423190</guid>
		<description>Wired Mag had a great feature on oil-alternatives in December &#039;05. The whole piece is available &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/13.12/gas.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.

Linked on that page are the article&#039;s wonderful graphics. Under the heading &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/13.12/3070.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;$30-$70&lt;/a&gt;&quot; in the side bar, they show that  the USA has about 1/100th (roughly--I am estimating off their highly stylized chart) the arable land to produce enough soybeans to make enough biodiesel to replace the amount of oil we used last year. 

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/13.12/ethanol.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Ethanol&lt;/a&gt; is a different story, but still drastic: According to their sources, we only produce corn with a tiny fraction of the arable land in this country, but if we instead grew corn on 1/4 or so of the arable land available to us, we could make enough ethanol to replace the oil amount of oil we used last year. 

Of course, then there is the question of fertilizing the crops--current inorganic fertilizers are made in chemical plants powered by coal or what have you from a large number of oil products. And the pesticides we use are all hydrocarbon derived using massive amounts of energy, in most cases from coal. And the tractors to plant and reap the crops, plus the trucks to transport the grain or soy... We&#039;ve got a LONG way to go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wired Mag had a great feature on oil-alternatives in December &#8216;05. The whole piece is available <a href="http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/13.12/gas.html" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
<p>Linked on that page are the article&#8217;s wonderful graphics. Under the heading &#8220;<a href="http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/13.12/3070.html" rel="nofollow">$30-$70</a>&#8221; in the side bar, they show that  the USA has about 1/100th (roughly&#8211;I am estimating off their highly stylized chart) the arable land to produce enough soybeans to make enough biodiesel to replace the amount of oil we used last year. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/13.12/ethanol.html" rel="nofollow">Ethanol</a> is a different story, but still drastic: According to their sources, we only produce corn with a tiny fraction of the arable land in this country, but if we instead grew corn on 1/4 or so of the arable land available to us, we could make enough ethanol to replace the oil amount of oil we used last year. </p>
<p>Of course, then there is the question of fertilizing the crops&#8211;current inorganic fertilizers are made in chemical plants powered by coal or what have you from a large number of oil products. And the pesticides we use are all hydrocarbon derived using massive amounts of energy, in most cases from coal. And the tractors to plant and reap the crops, plus the trucks to transport the grain or soy&#8230; We&#8217;ve got a LONG way to go.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=423190', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: big papa</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/25/big-oil-biofuels/comment-page-3/#comment-422667</link>
		<dc:creator>big papa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2006 17:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/25/big-oil-biofuels/#comment-422667</guid>
		<description>Where&#039;s that &quot;roundeye&quot; fool and his proof?

I could&#039;ve disproved or not &quot;The Origin of Species&quot; in this amount of time...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where&#8217;s that &#8220;roundeye&#8221; fool and his proof?</p>
<p>I could&#8217;ve disproved or not &#8220;The Origin of Species&#8221; in this amount of time&#8230;<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=422667', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: big papa</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/25/big-oil-biofuels/comment-page-3/#comment-422662</link>
		<dc:creator>big papa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2006 17:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/25/big-oil-biofuels/#comment-422662</guid>
		<description>Not only am I decreasing my dependence on the BIG Corporate Industries, but I now have considerably less stress in my life, and, as a result am regularly mistaken for being considerably younger than my real age. Itâ€™s not just about â€™sticking it to the manâ€™, but about living in harmony and balance with the earth - as we should be.

Comment by unbelievable

I envy you your ability to live the spartan life...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not only am I decreasing my dependence on the BIG Corporate Industries, but I now have considerably less stress in my life, and, as a result am regularly mistaken for being considerably younger than my real age. Itâ€™s not just about â€™sticking it to the manâ€™, but about living in harmony and balance with the earth &#8211; as we should be.</p>
<p>Comment by unbelievable</p>
<p>I envy you your ability to live the spartan life&#8230;<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=422662', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: realist67</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/25/big-oil-biofuels/comment-page-3/#comment-422563</link>
		<dc:creator>realist67</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2006 17:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/25/big-oil-biofuels/#comment-422563</guid>
		<description>Comment by unbelievable: 

I live close to my job, use public transportation when available and walk to places within a 2 mile radius. I grow a garden in the summer. I stopped watching commercials and limit my television to 3 to 5 hours per week. When I go to the store, I go with a list and only go where these items lie (incredible how much I was spending on nothing of value that just fattens the wallets of Corporate America). Not only am I decreasing my dependence on the BIG Corporate Industries, but I now have considerably less stress in my life, and, as a result am regularly mistaken for being considerably younger than my real age. Itâ€™s not just about â€™sticking it to the manâ€™, but about living in harmony and balance with the earth - as we should be.

Sounds like a lot of common sense. I too, would like to change my life: Can you state some books or websites that have pointers about this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comment by unbelievable: </p>
<p>I live close to my job, use public transportation when available and walk to places within a 2 mile radius. I grow a garden in the summer. I stopped watching commercials and limit my television to 3 to 5 hours per week. When I go to the store, I go with a list and only go where these items lie (incredible how much I was spending on nothing of value that just fattens the wallets of Corporate America). Not only am I decreasing my dependence on the BIG Corporate Industries, but I now have considerably less stress in my life, and, as a result am regularly mistaken for being considerably younger than my real age. Itâ€™s not just about â€™sticking it to the manâ€™, but about living in harmony and balance with the earth &#8211; as we should be.</p>
<p>Sounds like a lot of common sense. I too, would like to change my life: Can you state some books or websites that have pointers about this?<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=422563', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clif</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/25/big-oil-biofuels/comment-page-3/#comment-422294</link>
		<dc:creator>Clif</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2006 13:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/25/big-oil-biofuels/#comment-422294</guid>
		<description>I meant #125 the numbers keep changing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I meant #125 the numbers keep changing<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=422294', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clif</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/25/big-oil-biofuels/comment-page-3/#comment-422291</link>
		<dc:creator>Clif</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2006 13:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/25/big-oil-biofuels/#comment-422291</guid>
		<description>#126 They aren&#039;t trying to protect their status quo, they are trying to totally dominate,The five countries that will dominate the oil market from this time foward....Saudia Arabia, Iraq, Iran, Kuwait and the United Arab Emeraits,  with Saudia Arabia and Kuwait all ready &quot;in their Pocket&quot; bushco, inc. is going after the other Iraq (invasion complete) and Iran, then they will controll the major OPEC power brokers and the world oil market, Kinda makes the vanishing WMD argument more understandable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#126 They aren&#8217;t trying to protect their status quo, they are trying to totally dominate,The five countries that will dominate the oil market from this time foward&#8230;.Saudia Arabia, Iraq, Iran, Kuwait and the United Arab Emeraits,  with Saudia Arabia and Kuwait all ready &#8220;in their Pocket&#8221; bushco, inc. is going after the other Iraq (invasion complete) and Iran, then they will controll the major OPEC power brokers and the world oil market, Kinda makes the vanishing WMD argument more understandable.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=422291', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris MattPukes</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/25/big-oil-biofuels/comment-page-3/#comment-422289</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris MattPukes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2006 13:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/25/big-oil-biofuels/#comment-422289</guid>
		<description>#Biofuels appear to be a good way to help solve the energy crisis until one considers the thermodymics involved in the food-to-fuels conversion. At best, itâ€™s a poor net gain, at worst it consumes more kjoules of energy than it produces (all things being considered).

Comment by roundup â€” January 25, 2006 @ 5:04 pm

Well I can point to some patents for Motionless Generators and Scalar field devices. One such device was patented years ago and installed in the ICBM missiles. NOTE; This is not Free energy but a very high C.O.P.
Many of these Inventors, such as the Wankle C.O.P. Motor have been bought out or silenced by big oil.

The Soviets claim that very deep oil reserves actually replenish themselves thru the Earths lower crusts.
From USGS
http://pubs.usgs.gov/publications/text/tectonics.html
Fossil fuels
Oil and natural gas are the products of the deep burial and decomposition of accumulated organic material in geologic basins that flank mountain ranges formed by plate-tectonic processes. Heat and pressure at depth transform the decomposed organic material into tiny pockets of gas and liquid petroleum, which then migrate through the pore spaces and larger openings in the surrounding rocks and collect in reservoirs, generally within 5 km of the Earth&#039;s surface.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#Biofuels appear to be a good way to help solve the energy crisis until one considers the thermodymics involved in the food-to-fuels conversion. At best, itâ€™s a poor net gain, at worst it consumes more kjoules of energy than it produces (all things being considered).</p>
<p>Comment by roundup â€” January 25, 2006 @ 5:04 pm</p>
<p>Well I can point to some patents for Motionless Generators and Scalar field devices. One such device was patented years ago and installed in the ICBM missiles. NOTE; This is not Free energy but a very high C.O.P.<br />
Many of these Inventors, such as the Wankle C.O.P. Motor have been bought out or silenced by big oil.</p>
<p>The Soviets claim that very deep oil reserves actually replenish themselves thru the Earths lower crusts.<br />
From USGS<br />
<a href="http://pubs.usgs.gov/publications/text/tectonics.html" rel="nofollow">http://pubs.usgs.gov/publications/text/tectonics.html</a><br />
Fossil fuels<br />
Oil and natural gas are the products of the deep burial and decomposition of accumulated organic material in geologic basins that flank mountain ranges formed by plate-tectonic processes. Heat and pressure at depth transform the decomposed organic material into tiny pockets of gas and liquid petroleum, which then migrate through the pore spaces and larger openings in the surrounding rocks and collect in reservoirs, generally within 5 km of the Earth&#8217;s surface.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=422289', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris MattPukes</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/25/big-oil-biofuels/comment-page-3/#comment-422285</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris MattPukes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2006 13:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/25/big-oil-biofuels/#comment-422285</guid>
		<description>Hemp OIL is not only a Viable source of energy, the material is very much like cotton and can be sewn into garments as well. Not to mention Hemp oil Soaps Shampoos, cleaners, etc..
Many forget that at one point the Christians ate hemp seed gruel to survive (Hemp seed near perfect food) and hemp seed, or the Extracts of are used in Ice Cream and many other products TODAY.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hemp OIL is not only a Viable source of energy, the material is very much like cotton and can be sewn into garments as well. Not to mention Hemp oil Soaps Shampoos, cleaners, etc..<br />
Many forget that at one point the Christians ate hemp seed gruel to survive (Hemp seed near perfect food) and hemp seed, or the Extracts of are used in Ice Cream and many other products TODAY.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=422285', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris MattPukes</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/25/big-oil-biofuels/comment-page-3/#comment-422284</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris MattPukes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2006 13:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/25/big-oil-biofuels/#comment-422284</guid>
		<description>As far as MR BIO man and his cant find the Links, but trust me. Its a FACT (Wwallace syndrome) Jackass Dem seems he has forgotten how many oil wells in the US have been quietly shut down, Reducing American Capacity.

America IS the Second Largest Producer of OIL. Look at the San Andreas Fault Line. I know for a Fact they have been drilling in the Middle of Los Angeles for Oil last year, right under your noses.

Now Show us some FACTS mr trust me Jackass Dem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as MR BIO man and his cant find the Links, but trust me. Its a FACT (Wwallace syndrome) Jackass Dem seems he has forgotten how many oil wells in the US have been quietly shut down, Reducing American Capacity.</p>
<p>America IS the Second Largest Producer of OIL. Look at the San Andreas Fault Line. I know for a Fact they have been drilling in the Middle of Los Angeles for Oil last year, right under your noses.</p>
<p>Now Show us some FACTS mr trust me Jackass Dem.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=422284', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris MattPukes</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/25/big-oil-biofuels/comment-page-3/#comment-422281</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris MattPukes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2006 13:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/25/big-oil-biofuels/#comment-422281</guid>
		<description>#Practice saying Justice Samuel Alito. Just one more liberal needs to step down before a true conservative majority is formed.

Oh well, you can still live in fairy tale land and pretend Bush is spying on you.

Comment by Innocent Lite â€” January 25, 2006 @ 5:11 pm

Hes just another Borker. They will say anything to get confirmed. Heres Roberts First &#039;Loss&#039; and Yet another to Bushco;
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060117/ap_on_go_su_co/scotus_assisted_suicide
WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court on Tuesday blocked the Bush administration&#039;s attempt to punish doctors who help terminally ill patients die, protecting Oregon&#039;s one-of-a-kind assisted-suicide law.
It was the first loss for Chief Justice John Roberts, who joined the court&#039;s most conservative members â€”
Antonin Scalia and
Clarence Thomas â€” in a long but restrained dissent.
The administration improperly tried to use a federal drug law to pursue Oregon doctors who prescribe lethal doses of prescription medicines, the court said in a rebuke to former Attorney General
John Ashcroft.
The 6-3 ruling could encourage other states to consider copying Oregon&#039;s law, used to end the lives of more than 200 seriously ill people in that state. The decision, one of the biggest expected from the court this year, also could set the stage for Congress to attempt to outlaw assisted suicide.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#Practice saying Justice Samuel Alito. Just one more liberal needs to step down before a true conservative majority is formed.</p>
<p>Oh well, you can still live in fairy tale land and pretend Bush is spying on you.</p>
<p>Comment by Innocent Lite â€” January 25, 2006 @ 5:11 pm</p>
<p>Hes just another Borker. They will say anything to get confirmed. Heres Roberts First &#8216;Loss&#8217; and Yet another to Bushco;<br />
<a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060117/ap_on_go_su_co/scotus_assisted_suicide" rel="nofollow">http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060117/ap_on_go_su_co/scotus_assisted_suicide</a><br />
WASHINGTON &#8211; The Supreme Court on Tuesday blocked the Bush administration&#8217;s attempt to punish doctors who help terminally ill patients die, protecting Oregon&#8217;s one-of-a-kind assisted-suicide law.<br />
It was the first loss for Chief Justice John Roberts, who joined the court&#8217;s most conservative members â€”<br />
Antonin Scalia and<br />
Clarence Thomas â€” in a long but restrained dissent.<br />
The administration improperly tried to use a federal drug law to pursue Oregon doctors who prescribe lethal doses of prescription medicines, the court said in a rebuke to former Attorney General<br />
John Ashcroft.<br />
The 6-3 ruling could encourage other states to consider copying Oregon&#8217;s law, used to end the lives of more than 200 seriously ill people in that state. The decision, one of the biggest expected from the court this year, also could set the stage for Congress to attempt to outlaw assisted suicide.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=422281', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: big papa</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/25/big-oil-biofuels/comment-page-3/#comment-422277</link>
		<dc:creator>big papa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2006 12:56:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/25/big-oil-biofuels/#comment-422277</guid>
		<description>We might as well admit it, for the next three years we have a &quot;black gold&quot; administration in power whose only mission is to protect their enormous investment in the status quo...

Anything that interferes with that and helps the poor to boot - &quot;fuhgetaboutit- 

plutocratic government is not interested in &quot;the greater good&quot;, only investment returns...

There&#039;ll be NO bio-fuel development as long as there&#039;s a republiscum in the White House and majority controlling the House and Senate...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We might as well admit it, for the next three years we have a &#8220;black gold&#8221; administration in power whose only mission is to protect their enormous investment in the status quo&#8230;</p>
<p>Anything that interferes with that and helps the poor to boot &#8211; &#8220;fuhgetaboutit- </p>
<p>plutocratic government is not interested in &#8220;the greater good&#8221;, only investment returns&#8230;</p>
<p>There&#8217;ll be NO bio-fuel development as long as there&#8217;s a republiscum in the White House and majority controlling the House and Senate&#8230;<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=422277', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: big papa</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/25/big-oil-biofuels/comment-page-3/#comment-422276</link>
		<dc:creator>big papa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2006 12:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/25/big-oil-biofuels/#comment-422276</guid>
		<description>At best, itâ€™s a poor net gain, at worst it consumes more kjoules of energy than it produces (all things being considered). 

Comment by roundup #9

&lt;strong&gt;roundeye,

spoken like a true douche bag,

What kind of voodoo science do you have to back it up?&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At best, itâ€™s a poor net gain, at worst it consumes more kjoules of energy than it produces (all things being considered). </p>
<p>Comment by roundup #9</p>
<p><strong>roundeye,</p>
<p>spoken like a true douche bag,</p>
<p>What kind of voodoo science do you have to back it up?</strong><a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=422276', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
