<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PHOTO: Abramoff and Interior Secretary Gale Norton</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/28/photo-abramoff-norton/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/28/photo-abramoff-norton/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 13:04:02 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Think Progress &#187; Another Abramoff casualty?</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/28/photo-abramoff-norton/comment-page-2/#comment-471330</link>
		<dc:creator>Think Progress &#187; Another Abramoff casualty?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 17:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/28/photo-abramoff-norton/#comment-471330</guid>
		<description>[...] The Denver Post reports that Interior Secretary Gale Norton will announce her resignation today. Here&#8217;s a photo to remember her by.&#160;  12:37 pm &#124; Comment&#160;(0) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Denver Post reports that Interior Secretary Gale Norton will announce her resignation today. Here&#8217;s a photo to remember her by.&nbsp;  12:37 pm | Comment&nbsp;(0) [...]<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=471330', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RightPunch</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/28/photo-abramoff-norton/comment-page-2/#comment-430877</link>
		<dc:creator>RightPunch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2006 22:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/28/photo-abramoff-norton/#comment-430877</guid>
		<description>Lord... I am dumber than I-Right-I and it admits it is an idiot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lord&#8230; I am dumber than I-Right-I and it admits it is an idiot.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=430877', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I-RIGHT-I</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/28/photo-abramoff-norton/comment-page-2/#comment-430869</link>
		<dc:creator>I-RIGHT-I</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2006 22:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/28/photo-abramoff-norton/#comment-430869</guid>
		<description>I am an idiot!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am an idiot!<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=430869', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Big K</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/28/photo-abramoff-norton/comment-page-2/#comment-430554</link>
		<dc:creator>The Big K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2006 19:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/28/photo-abramoff-norton/#comment-430554</guid>
		<description>Has anyone considered the idea that Bush won&#039;t release the photos of him and Abramoff because people would confuse the pictures of stills from Brokeback Mountain?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anyone considered the idea that Bush won&#8217;t release the photos of him and Abramoff because people would confuse the pictures of stills from Brokeback Mountain?<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=430554', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PinkDome</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/28/photo-abramoff-norton/comment-page-2/#comment-430104</link>
		<dc:creator>PinkDome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2006 14:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/28/photo-abramoff-norton/#comment-430104</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Not Bush, Not Yet...&lt;/strong&gt;

 Gale Norton, Bush&#039;s Secretary of the Interior, in the middle. Abramoff on the far right. The other three are some of Abramoff&#039;s Native-American clients (aka one of the groups he would eventually screw over). Very interesting. [ThinkProgress]......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Not Bush, Not Yet&#8230;</strong></p>
<p> Gale Norton, Bush&#8217;s Secretary of the Interior, in the middle. Abramoff on the far right. The other three are some of Abramoff&#8217;s Native-American clients (aka one of the groups he would eventually screw over). Very interesting. [ThinkProgress]&#8230;&#8230;<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=430104', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fran kaye</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/28/photo-abramoff-norton/comment-page-2/#comment-428628</link>
		<dc:creator>fran kaye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2006 18:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/28/photo-abramoff-norton/#comment-428628</guid>
		<description>REPUBLICANS ARE LIKE SHEEP -- THE TRUTH AND THE FACTS DON&#039;T MATTER</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>REPUBLICANS ARE LIKE SHEEP &#8212; THE TRUTH AND THE FACTS DON&#8217;T MATTER<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=428628', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abramoff and Interior Secretary Gale Norton - Brokekid.net</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/28/photo-abramoff-norton/comment-page-2/#comment-428507</link>
		<dc:creator>Abramoff and Interior Secretary Gale Norton - Brokekid.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2006 16:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/28/photo-abramoff-norton/#comment-428507</guid>
		<description>[...] (via thinkprogress.org) The Interior Department has released a February 2002 photo of Jack Abramoff (far right), Secretary of the Interior Gale Norton (Center) and representatives of the Choctaw Indians, one of Abramoff&#8217;s tribal clients: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (via thinkprogress.org) The Interior Department has released a February 2002 photo of Jack Abramoff (far right), Secretary of the Interior Gale Norton (Center) and representatives of the Choctaw Indians, one of Abramoff&#8217;s tribal clients: [...]<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=428507', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DrBB</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/28/photo-abramoff-norton/comment-page-2/#comment-428372</link>
		<dc:creator>DrBB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2006 14:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/28/photo-abramoff-norton/#comment-428372</guid>
		<description>Gotta just weigh in here about how hilarious it is for the right wingers to be poo-pooing the importance of these pictures. Of COURSE they don&#039;t necessarily mean anything. That&#039;s what&#039;s so funny. The Bushies THEMSELVES are the ones who have elevated this nonsense to ultra-significance. How? By scrambling around trying to expunge every such picture, like Stalin&#039;s guys airbrushing out images of unpersons from official photographs.

It&#039;s YOUR GUYS who have made this into the game it has become. Absolutely nothing is more viscerally damning than to be caught trying to hide evidence, even if the evidence is completely innocuous. Actually, all the more so if it&#039;s innocuous, because it just REEKS of guilty conscience. 

YOUR GUYS are the ones trying to hide these pictures. For people who have nothing to hide, these peope sure seem to spend a stupendous amount of time and effort hiding things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gotta just weigh in here about how hilarious it is for the right wingers to be poo-pooing the importance of these pictures. Of COURSE they don&#8217;t necessarily mean anything. That&#8217;s what&#8217;s so funny. The Bushies THEMSELVES are the ones who have elevated this nonsense to ultra-significance. How? By scrambling around trying to expunge every such picture, like Stalin&#8217;s guys airbrushing out images of unpersons from official photographs.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s YOUR GUYS who have made this into the game it has become. Absolutely nothing is more viscerally damning than to be caught trying to hide evidence, even if the evidence is completely innocuous. Actually, all the more so if it&#8217;s innocuous, because it just REEKS of guilty conscience. </p>
<p>YOUR GUYS are the ones trying to hide these pictures. For people who have nothing to hide, these peope sure seem to spend a stupendous amount of time and effort hiding things.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=428372', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlanDownunder</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/28/photo-abramoff-norton/comment-page-2/#comment-428245</link>
		<dc:creator>AlanDownunder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2006 10:54:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/28/photo-abramoff-norton/#comment-428245</guid>
		<description>Meanwhile, keep those Bush/Libby shots coming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meanwhile, keep those Bush/Libby shots coming.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=428245', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Oracle</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/28/photo-abramoff-norton/comment-page-2/#comment-427889</link>
		<dc:creator>The Oracle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2006 05:03:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/28/photo-abramoff-norton/#comment-427889</guid>
		<description>So, where are the photos of Abramoff with Dick Cheney?

Oh, you know, because Abramoff was one of the top dogs in the Republican Party leadership, then there must be a whole bunch of photos of him with other top dog Republicans. Ralph Reed? Grover Norquist? Tom Delay? George W. Bush? Dick Cheney? Dennis Hastert? Bill Frist? Alberto Gonzales?

You know. Photos (or what I like to call them, mug shots) of Abramoff with all the other top dog members of the Corruptlican Party.

Oh, how much you want to bet that the Corruptlican leadership is looking for ALL damaging photos linking Abramoff to them.

The Corruptlicans should all be brought up on racketeering charges, because (just like in Abramoff&#039;s courthouse steps photo) they all are looking and acting like a bunch of low-life mobsters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, where are the photos of Abramoff with Dick Cheney?</p>
<p>Oh, you know, because Abramoff was one of the top dogs in the Republican Party leadership, then there must be a whole bunch of photos of him with other top dog Republicans. Ralph Reed? Grover Norquist? Tom Delay? George W. Bush? Dick Cheney? Dennis Hastert? Bill Frist? Alberto Gonzales?</p>
<p>You know. Photos (or what I like to call them, mug shots) of Abramoff with all the other top dog members of the Corruptlican Party.</p>
<p>Oh, how much you want to bet that the Corruptlican leadership is looking for ALL damaging photos linking Abramoff to them.</p>
<p>The Corruptlicans should all be brought up on racketeering charges, because (just like in Abramoff&#8217;s courthouse steps photo) they all are looking and acting like a bunch of low-life mobsters.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=427889', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Randal</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/28/photo-abramoff-norton/comment-page-2/#comment-427776</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Randal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2006 03:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/28/photo-abramoff-norton/#comment-427776</guid>
		<description>Abramoff signed checks to Republicans, but he NEVER gave any to Democrats! Some of his former Indian Casino Tribe clients on their own gave campaign donations to some Democrats, but Abramoff was NOT involved! In fact he was pissed that some Tribes helped Democrats!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Abramoff signed checks to Republicans, but he NEVER gave any to Democrats! Some of his former Indian Casino Tribe clients on their own gave campaign donations to some Democrats, but Abramoff was NOT involved! In fact he was pissed that some Tribes helped Democrats!<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=427776', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G. Gordon Giddy</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/28/photo-abramoff-norton/comment-page-2/#comment-427603</link>
		<dc:creator>G. Gordon Giddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2006 01:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/28/photo-abramoff-norton/#comment-427603</guid>
		<description>Spudge,

Yanno what? When they do this:

    &lt;em&gt;Why so hostile? 



    Are you incapable of basic civility?&lt;/em&gt;

Ask &#039;em if Rover knows they want to give a suicide bomber a hug. Damn, I wish they would. Right before he hit the switch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spudge,</p>
<p>Yanno what? When they do this:</p>
<p>    <em>Why so hostile? </p>
<p>    Are you incapable of basic civility?</em></p>
<p>Ask &#8216;em if Rover knows they want to give a suicide bomber a hug. Damn, I wish they would. Right before he hit the switch.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=427603', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G. Gordon Giddy</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/28/photo-abramoff-norton/comment-page-2/#comment-427597</link>
		<dc:creator>G. Gordon Giddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2006 01:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/28/photo-abramoff-norton/#comment-427597</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Why so hostile? &lt;/em&gt;

You reap what you sow. You are the Christians. Most of us, even the Christians, are also secular humanists, too. You turn the other cheek so we can slap that one, too

&lt;em&gt;Are you incapable of basic civility?&lt;/em&gt;

&lt;em&gt;Not with retards like you.&lt;/em&gt;

Actually, I know of no developmentally disabled people as disturbed and dense as any of you Bush supporters, and would rather converse with a person with severe Downs syndrome. They are apt to be sharper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Why so hostile? </em></p>
<p>You reap what you sow. You are the Christians. Most of us, even the Christians, are also secular humanists, too. You turn the other cheek so we can slap that one, too</p>
<p><em>Are you incapable of basic civility?</em></p>
<p><em>Not with retards like you.</em></p>
<p>Actually, I know of no developmentally disabled people as disturbed and dense as any of you Bush supporters, and would rather converse with a person with severe Downs syndrome. They are apt to be sharper.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=427597', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SpudgeBoy</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/28/photo-abramoff-norton/comment-page-2/#comment-427351</link>
		<dc:creator>SpudgeBoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2006 00:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/28/photo-abramoff-norton/#comment-427351</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Why so hostile? &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Because I am sick of retards like you.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Are you incapable of basic civility?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Not with retards like you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Why so hostile? </p></blockquote>
<p>Because I am sick of retards like you.</p>
<blockquote><p>Are you incapable of basic civility?</p></blockquote>
<p>Not with retards like you.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=427351', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G. Gordon Giddy</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/28/photo-abramoff-norton/comment-page-2/#comment-427339</link>
		<dc:creator>G. Gordon Giddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2006 00:02:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/28/photo-abramoff-norton/#comment-427339</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s be clear for Jack, who doesn&#039;t know himself, except in the carnal sense:

&lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thepoorman.net/2006/01/28/katie-lied/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The thing I love about this lie&lt;/a&gt; is how it doesnâ€™t even try to be plausible. The Center for Responsive Politics shows that life-long Republican activist Jack Abramoff donated $0.00 to Democrats. Shocker. After being alerted to the fact that the reference Couric cited plainly disproves her claim, NBCâ€™s Matt Lauer and Tim Russert respond as any responsible media figure would respond - by moving the goalposts:

(...)

&lt;strong&gt;Can anybody tell me what â€œ66 percent of the money in this situation went to Republicans, but 34 percent of the money â€” not from Abramoff, but from his associates and clients â€” went to Democratsâ€ means? What â€œsituationâ€? What point does he think he is making? Abramoff stole money from Indian tribes. He defrauded his creditors when purchasing the SunCruz casino (and the guy he bought it from later turned up dead.) He has agreed to testify against his Republican friends about an unknown number of shady doings. Thatâ€™s what the story is. Leaving aside for a moment the fact that Jack Abramoff feeding money to Democrats makes about as much sense as having Grant receive reinforcements from Nathan Bedford Forrest, what point does Lauer imagine heâ€™s making?&lt;/strong&gt; Willful And Malicious Receiving of Money From Indians is not, to the best of my legal knowledge, a punishable offense, nor is it unethical, except in the way that the funding of our whole political system is sleazy. Suppose Democrats got 100% of the money from Indian tribes - I donâ€™t get what that would prove, aside from that what we think of as â€œrealityâ€ is merely one of Jonah Goldbergâ€™s particularly implausible wet dreams. That Jack Abramoff was a double agent? That Tom DeLay is secretly a Democrat? That Michael Moore is svelt? I donâ€™t get it.

I honestly donâ€™t think the problem is partisanship. If the problem was partisanship, they could come up with an angle that makes some sort of sense. (Itâ€™s not like Democrats havenâ€™t learned a thing or two from Tom DeLayâ€™s success.) I think that the problem is just that Lauer, Couric and Russert canâ€™t, or wonâ€™t, understand the not-especially-complex issues at hand. Somehow, however, the concept that â€œJack Abramoff has cootiesâ€ has managed to penetrate thick crust of hair-spray residue that protects their vestigal brains from potentially-confusing facts. Now - if my theory is correct - these journalists have decided that, in order to protect the public from a potential cooties pandemic, they need to determine who touched Abramoff, and who touched anyone who touched Abramoff, etc. Not being a epidemiologist, I canâ€™t speak learnedly about the vectors of cootie transmission, but I suppose you should be always err on the side of caution when dealing with these sorts of things. Anyway, thatâ€™s my best guess. That, or theyâ€™re all fucking wankers.&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s be clear for Jack, who doesn&#8217;t know himself, except in the carnal sense:</p>
<p><em><a href="http://www.thepoorman.net/2006/01/28/katie-lied/" rel="nofollow">The thing I love about this lie</a> is how it doesnâ€™t even try to be plausible. The Center for Responsive Politics shows that life-long Republican activist Jack Abramoff donated $0.00 to Democrats. Shocker. After being alerted to the fact that the reference Couric cited plainly disproves her claim, NBCâ€™s Matt Lauer and Tim Russert respond as any responsible media figure would respond &#8211; by moving the goalposts:</p>
<p>(&#8230;)</p>
<p><strong>Can anybody tell me what â€œ66 percent of the money in this situation went to Republicans, but 34 percent of the money â€” not from Abramoff, but from his associates and clients â€” went to Democratsâ€ means? What â€œsituationâ€? What point does he think he is making? Abramoff stole money from Indian tribes. He defrauded his creditors when purchasing the SunCruz casino (and the guy he bought it from later turned up dead.) He has agreed to testify against his Republican friends about an unknown number of shady doings. Thatâ€™s what the story is. Leaving aside for a moment the fact that Jack Abramoff feeding money to Democrats makes about as much sense as having Grant receive reinforcements from Nathan Bedford Forrest, what point does Lauer imagine heâ€™s making?</strong> Willful And Malicious Receiving of Money From Indians is not, to the best of my legal knowledge, a punishable offense, nor is it unethical, except in the way that the funding of our whole political system is sleazy. Suppose Democrats got 100% of the money from Indian tribes &#8211; I donâ€™t get what that would prove, aside from that what we think of as â€œrealityâ€ is merely one of Jonah Goldbergâ€™s particularly implausible wet dreams. That Jack Abramoff was a double agent? That Tom DeLay is secretly a Democrat? That Michael Moore is svelt? I donâ€™t get it.</p>
<p>I honestly donâ€™t think the problem is partisanship. If the problem was partisanship, they could come up with an angle that makes some sort of sense. (Itâ€™s not like Democrats havenâ€™t learned a thing or two from Tom DeLayâ€™s success.) I think that the problem is just that Lauer, Couric and Russert canâ€™t, or wonâ€™t, understand the not-especially-complex issues at hand. Somehow, however, the concept that â€œJack Abramoff has cootiesâ€ has managed to penetrate thick crust of hair-spray residue that protects their vestigal brains from potentially-confusing facts. Now &#8211; if my theory is correct &#8211; these journalists have decided that, in order to protect the public from a potential cooties pandemic, they need to determine who touched Abramoff, and who touched anyone who touched Abramoff, etc. Not being a epidemiologist, I canâ€™t speak learnedly about the vectors of cootie transmission, but I suppose you should be always err on the side of caution when dealing with these sorts of things. Anyway, thatâ€™s my best guess. That, or theyâ€™re all fucking wankers.</em><a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=427339', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G. Gordon Giddy</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/28/photo-abramoff-norton/comment-page-2/#comment-427328</link>
		<dc:creator>G. Gordon Giddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2006 23:56:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/28/photo-abramoff-norton/#comment-427328</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;RightPunch, like I said before, Iâ€™m not interested in your petty insults. 

Comment by Jack&lt;/em&gt;

He&#039;s interested in your incisive criticism, witticism and bon mots, and grandiose insults, they are a more appropriate response to his grandiose notions and delusions of grandeur. He&#039;s in a fugue state.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>RightPunch, like I said before, Iâ€™m not interested in your petty insults. </p>
<p>Comment by Jack</em></p>
<p>He&#8217;s interested in your incisive criticism, witticism and bon mots, and grandiose insults, they are a more appropriate response to his grandiose notions and delusions of grandeur. He&#8217;s in a fugue state.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=427328', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G. Gordon Giddy</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/28/photo-abramoff-norton/comment-page-2/#comment-427323</link>
		<dc:creator>G. Gordon Giddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2006 23:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/28/photo-abramoff-norton/#comment-427323</guid>
		<description>Mutt is MA. Jeff is I-R-I. And now I know whay RightPunch means. I like it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mutt is MA. Jeff is I-R-I. And now I know whay RightPunch means. I like it.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=427323', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G. Gordon Giddy</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/28/photo-abramoff-norton/comment-page-2/#comment-427320</link>
		<dc:creator>G. Gordon Giddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2006 23:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/28/photo-abramoff-norton/#comment-427320</guid>
		<description>Pre-9/11 viewpoint, Mutt? Exactly what does that mean? Drivel. Like pre-Pearl Harbor viewpoint. Rhetorical drivel. Save it for the rubes and yokels. At least be clear and honest about it with those of us who don&#039;t fit that description, any thinking person: Pre-nuclear and WMD. There&#039;s your paradigm shift. Once the Genie gets out of the bottle... and who was it gave Iran their first nuclear technology? Republicans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pre-9/11 viewpoint, Mutt? Exactly what does that mean? Drivel. Like pre-Pearl Harbor viewpoint. Rhetorical drivel. Save it for the rubes and yokels. At least be clear and honest about it with those of us who don&#8217;t fit that description, any thinking person: Pre-nuclear and WMD. There&#8217;s your paradigm shift. Once the Genie gets out of the bottle&#8230; and who was it gave Iran their first nuclear technology? Republicans.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=427320', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/28/photo-abramoff-norton/comment-page-2/#comment-427295</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2006 23:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/28/photo-abramoff-norton/#comment-427295</guid>
		<description>RightPunch, like I said before, I&#039;m not interested in your petty insults.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RightPunch, like I said before, I&#8217;m not interested in your petty insults.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=427295', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/28/photo-abramoff-norton/comment-page-2/#comment-427273</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2006 23:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/28/photo-abramoff-norton/#comment-427273</guid>
		<description>&quot;But if it isnâ€™t guilt by association, the left wing point of view, then this chick and Harry Reid are innocent.&quot;

So ThinkProgress&#039;s point here is to argue that Norton is innocent?  That&#039;s the argument they&#039;re making?  HAHA, funny one, SpudgeBoy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;But if it isnâ€™t guilt by association, the left wing point of view, then this chick and Harry Reid are innocent.&#8221;</p>
<p>So ThinkProgress&#8217;s point here is to argue that Norton is innocent?  That&#8217;s the argument they&#8217;re making?  HAHA, funny one, SpudgeBoy.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=427273', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
