After this soaks in, I am sure what you have here is really brilliant.

I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view

Hi – just wanted to say good design and blog -

http://www.oldamericancentury.org/dave3_039.htm

11 months (!!) before the trial can start…….. and after the elections…..his easy accomodation because just ONE of Libby’s defence team lawyers supposedly had a scheduling conflict is very convenient… after all, it is not as though Libby was just arrested yesterday….. and especially after reading in the Jenkins article, -’From February 2003 to April 2004,(15 months!) Walton repeatedly scheduled and postponed hearings in the Edmonds case without citing any reason. There was no communication from Walton to Edmonds’ attorneys from October ’03 to April ’04 until a lawsuit on behalf of one thousand 9/11 families was filed which requested a deposition from Sibel Edmonds. Only then, does Walton move (at the government’s request) to not only quash Edmonds ’ subpoena on behalf of the 9/11 families, but also upholds the gag order imposed on her using the State Secrets Privilege.’

I think there are some valid questions raised here that need to be amplified. Does this Judge Reggie Walton seem to be a bit fishy or what?
Regards,
Jojam Franc

Our former Democratic President has a PROVEN record of how to run a country. What part of Peace and Prosperity do you not like?

CRAZY EDDIE! HIS PRICES ARE IIIINSAAAAAAAANE! :)

I remember the ads very well.

How about justice? How about proving that no one is above the law? Quaint as those notions may be, some people actually still believe they have merit.

But, nice try at diversion. Hard to keep that Culture of Corruption going if people are paying attention.

Dont you understand that if we get rid of all the slime and crud the pukes, and you, spew about, this country will be much better off=

We need to keep on the MSM’s back to keep the story alive up to and during the elections in November. Remind people just before they vote what kind of criminals they might be sending back to Congress.

And BTW, in redstate Tennessee, Diebold is OUT!!! We decided to go with Hart or ESS, but no Diebold. I suppose they figure they don’t have to court us here because we always vote for some bible thumpin dork. But, as with their general practice, repubs aren’t thinking ahead and at the very least, the elections will be fair.

How convenient. You just MUST read the comments that follow this post. One of Libby’s lawyers is busy. That’s the excuse. Look at the timing….

WASHINGTON (CNN) — A federal judge dismissed a lawsuit Tuesday by a former FBI translator because the information needed to prove the case was classified and protected by what is known as the “state secrets privilege.”

In the lawsuit, originally filed in July 2002, Sibel Edmonds alleged that her rights under the Privacy Act and her First and Fifth amendment rights had been violated by the government.

Edmonds, who worked as a contract linguist, claimed she was fired after she alerted authorities about purported security and management problems in the bureau’s language branch.

The Justice Department and the FBI both argued to the court that her lawsuit should be dismissed because much of the information needed to be considered for it was protected by the “state secrets privilege,” which is meant to protect classified national security information from being disclosed.

U.S. District Court Judge Reggie Walton agreed with the government’s position.

Looks like the fix may be in.