Comment by RightPunch

Are you a girl?

Do you hate the talking donkeys, the flat earths, the righteousness of slavery, the ‘cursed race’, the ‘tower of babel’ that could reach through the atmosphere and any number of the other fairy tales you subscribe to? Religious fanatics are such gullible little children who elist fairy tales to explain and support their hate, ignorance and biases. But I forgive you pumpkin. Clearly you were brainwashed as a baby, and now you hate out of fear and sometimes just for the fun of it. Poor pumpkin, such a lost and sad little tortured soul you are. You have my pity pumpkin. See unlike you and those hateful religious values you have – I love, forgive and have compassion for you, even though your only capacity in the world seems to be to spread hate, ignorance and intolerance. Poor thing, clearly it’s all you seem to have the will or capacity for doing, so like any mentally disturbed and/or lost homeless person I have pity on you pumpkin.

Of course, I’m sure that you hate me for my Christianity, just as you hate gay people, and Democrats.

Comment by Democrat Soldier

Your idea of a Christian is very fluid. In my experience Christianity and the Democratic Party are opposites. But then I’ve studied the faith and know a little more about it than “God is Love”. But let’s be clear about something, I don’t personally hate anyone except my sister in law. She is evil personified. I do hate organized evil of all sorts and for that you may call me a hater. I hate what God declares should be hated. The fact that you don’t proves that you’re no Christian, you just think you are. I’d pray about it if I were you. Maybe He will be merciful to you and stick a divine Clue Boot up your ass. You sure need it.

Of course, I’m sure that you hate me for my Christianity, just as you hate gay people, and Democrats.

I served in the miliitary because I believe that the Constitution applies to all Americans, not just those who support Pres. Bush, or those who support Christianity over other faiths. Christianity is in the heart. It does not exist by words alone, and all you’ve done is repeat the words. You express nothing of their Spirit, and that makes me pity you.

Even the Devil can quote scripture for his own purposes.

Then the LORD said to me, “The prophets are prophesying lies in my name. I have not sent them or appointed them or spoken to them. They are prophesying to you false visions, divinations, idolatries and the delusions of their own minds.”
- Jeremiah 14:13

If a man say, I love God, and hateth his brother, he is a liar: for he that loveth not his brother whom he hath seen, how can he love God whom he hath not seen?
- 1 John 4:20

For God sent his Son into the world not to condemn the world, but that the world, though Him, might be saved. – John 3:17

You, sir, I pity. You are a liar in word and in deed, and the words you parrot shall be as dust in your mouth. Maybe someday you will find the truth in the Christian faith. For now, you’ve proven to me that you only parrot the words and know not the Truth.

Comment by Democrat Soldier

I’m a Christian in a world filled with haters of Jesus Christ, just as He promised. I’m sure you find it appropriate that Christians are murdered every day by your friends the Muslim head choppers. I’m sure it’s quite all right with you if your Progressive Brownshirts call us Nazi and mentally unstable and that you attack every vestige of Christianity in this country while complaining that it is we who lord it over you. You sir are a Walking Dead Loser and I weep for my country every time you open your mouth.

The man that wandereth out of the way of understanding shall remain in the congregation of the dead. — Proverbs 21:16

So, why are you not calling Pres. Bush a “liar” when his lies are exposed? Too much moral fortitude to ask of you, right?

You, sir, would be the perfect ‘loyalist’ that would shove a dagger into the hearts of our founding fathers were that you born prior to 1776. You are the epitome of ‘special interests’ over human rights. I hope and pray that someday you find yourself on the other end of your arguments. It would be justified and appropriate were it so.

Comment by Democrat Soldier

One does not follow the other. Homosexuals are psychologically damaged and abnormal. I’d say that straight people who are addicted to sex would be closer to the mark but still not to the point of creating a sub-culture of perverts as the homosexuals have done.

I think you’re getting it in the reverse order: gay people are attacked and reviled by haters because of their sexual orientation.

Physical attacks on homos are almost non existent. Normal people are disgusted and angry at homosexual activism but not to the point of physical abuse, not yet. Homosexuals band together because of sexual attraction and wanting to be around like minded perverts, not out of fear.

While you like to broadly paint all gay persons as perverts, ]

By definition a homosexual is a pervert. Period.

you seem to become very upset when progressives paint all Republicans as “corrupt” when the majority of elected Republicans are exposed as corrupt.

I pay no attention to Left Wing Losers. Why would I when so many of them are moral degenerates.

Why do you hold one standard for everyone else and another less stringent standard for everyone else? Could it be that a single standard would hoist you by your own arguments?

There is a universal moral order and a Right and a Wrong. I apply the same standard to all to the best of my ability.

I think you’re getting it in the reverse order: gay people are attacked and reviled by haters because of their sexual orientation. In order to protect themselves from these attacks, they band together to pool their resources and provide safety in numbers. There is a direct correlation between fewer gay people in a group and their likelihood of being physically attacked. You don’t find too many ‘queer-bashers’ who attack a large group of gay people. they pick them off one-by-one. I guess they don’t want to take the chance they’ll get their butt’s kicked by ‘faries’.

While you like to broadly paint all gay persons as perverts, you seem to become very upset when progressives paint all Republicans as “corrupt” when the majority of elected Republicans are exposed as corrupt.

Why do you hold one standard for everyone else and another less stringent standard for everyone else? Could it be that a single standard would hoist you by your own arguments?

Comment by Democrat Soldier

The correct term is homosexual. There is nothing “gay” about sexual dysfunction. I’d say they can be patriotic but I doubt that’s why they join a mostly male armed services, or want to be Boy Scout leaders because they like the outdoors and are called to be Roman Catholic priests because they love God. Homosexuals define themselves by their sexual desires first, everything else is a poor second.

Honorism – prostrate yourself to special interests and sell the ountries soul for oil.

Dignitude – bankrupt the nation by removing all tax on anyone who makes millions of dollars a year, and shackle our great great grandchildren with paying off the massive debt for the special interests that financed my ascendency.

Yup! Pres. Bush sure followed through on THAT promise! Of course, any other promise he made was just words:
1 – Fiscal responsibility. NOT!
2 – Balanced budgets. NOT!
3 – No nation building. NOT!
4 – Weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. NOT!
5 – Uniter, not divider. NOT!
6 – All other promises. NOT!

Oh well! Soon the liar will be out of office, and his hypocritical, double-standard party will lose their majority, and they’ll cry. It’ll be up to the rest of America to pick uf the pieces of his failed leadership and try to save the Constitution upon which he shat.

My dad retired as a General in the State Defense Force, and he’s met more gay members of the military that I have!

I wonder why “Right between the I’s” doesn’t think that there are gay members in the military or the DOD? Intentional blindness? Can’t think of gay’s as being patriotic, can we?

Bush has no intention of occupying Iran. Rather, the goal is to destroy major weapons-sites, destabilize the regime, and occupy a sliver of land on the Iraqi border that contains 90% of Iran’s oil wealth. Ultimately, Washington will aim to replace the Mullahs with American-friendly clients who can police their own people and fabricate the appearance of representative government. But, that will have to wait. For now, the administration must prevent the incipient Iran bourse (oil-exchange) from opening in March and precipitating a global sell-off of the debt-ridden dollar. There have many fine articles written about the proposed “euro-based” bourse and the devastating effects it will have on the greenback. The best of these are “Petrodollar Warfare: Oil, Iraq and the Future of the Dollar” by William R. Clark, and “The Proposed Oil Bourse” by Krassimir Petrov, Ph.D.

The Bush administration has no intention of allowing that to take place. In fact, as the tax-cuts and the budget deficits indicate, the Bush cabal fully intends to perpetuate the system that trades worthless dollars for valuable commodities, labor, and resources. As long as the oil market is married to the dollar, this system of global indentured servitude will continue.

Battle Plans

The Bush administration’s attention has shifted to a small province in southwestern Iran that is unknown to most Americans. Never the less, Khuzestan will become the next front in the war on terror and the lynchpin for prevailing in the global resource war. If the Bush administration can sweep into the region (under the pretext disarming Iran’s nuclear programs) and put Iran’s prodigious oil wealth under US control, the dream of monopolizing Middle East oil will have been achieved.

Not surprisingly, this was Saddam Hussein’s strategy in 1980 when he initiated hostilities against Iran in a war that would last for eight years. Saddam was an American client at the time, so it is likely that he got the green light for the invasion from the Reagan White House. Many of Reagan’s high-ranking officials currently serve in the Bush administration; notably Rumsfeld and Cheney.

Khuzestan represents 90% of Iran’s oil production. The control over these massive fields will force the oil-dependent nations of China, Japan and India to continue to stockpile greenbacks despite the currency’s dubious value. The annexing of Khuzestan will prevent Iran’s bourse from opening, thereby guaranteeing that the dollar will maintain its dominant position as the world’s reserve currency. As long as the dollar reigns supreme and western elites have their hands on the Middle East oil-spigot, the current system of exploitation through debt will continue into perpetuity. The administration can confidently prolong its colossal deficits without fear of a plummeting dollar. In fact, the American war-machine and all its various appendages, from Guantanamo to Abrams Tanks, are paid for by the myriad nations who willingly hold reserves of American currency.

This extortion-scheme is typically referred to as the global economic system. In reality, it has nothing to do with either free markets or capitalism. That is just philosophical mumbo-jumbo. It is the dollar-system; predicated entirely on the ongoing monopoly of the oil trade in dollars.

Comment by WaltTheMan

That’s easy. There are still some decent Americans in the DOD but the DOE is chock full of homosexuals and ratbastardcommiemofos. Hope that helps.

Heck about everyone knows FAUX news, and MSM is BS, why cant the trolls figure that out?

Comment by mr ho

You are too stupid for words Mr. ho.

I guess you haven’t heard. Chocolate City is no more. It is now deemed a coastal wetland for birds and frogs. There will be no plan because recovery of the underwater ghettos is not viable or desirable. Why should the US taxpayer provide Billions to rebuild temporararily a doomed city for a quarter of a million fourth generation welfare recipients who will just turn it back into a shit hole in six months?

It ain’t gonna happen. Chocolate City is gone forever.

And what wordsmith wrote the definition for adequate:

“This rating describes a program that needs to set more ambitious goals, achieve better results, improve accountability or strengthen its management practices.”

That’s what we accept as “adequate?” E-gad!

Comment by WaltTheMan — February 6, 2006 @ 5:56 pm

Walt,

Four words: No Child Left Behind. You have a bunch of theories being espoused by people who’ve never set foot in a classroom, or been alone in the room with their own children without the nannies present. And they’re telling veterans that the key to educational success is through standardized test. Some of my brightest kids are failing because they are not left-brain dominant logical learners. The system is leaving children behind. Too many of them.