Comments on: Brooks: Liberal Blogs Are “Semi-Nuts and They Insist on a Stalinist Line of Discipline” http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/12/brooks-on-blogs/ Thu, 26 Nov 2009 20:09:07 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: Gay Sex Gay Ass Gay Ass http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/12/brooks-on-blogs/comment-page-4/#comment-4879998 Gay Sex Gay Ass Gay Ass Sat, 12 Apr 2008 16:24:58 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/12/brooks-on-blogs/#comment-4879998 <strong>Gay Sex Gay Ass Gay Ass</strong> I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view Gay Sex Gay Ass Gay Ass

I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view

]]> By: Jessie http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/12/brooks-on-blogs/comment-page-4/#comment-4825462 Jessie Wed, 09 Apr 2008 08:15:14 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/12/brooks-on-blogs/#comment-4825462 <strong>Jessie</strong> Thanks for the blog! Jessie

Thanks for the blog!

]]> By: Sex Gay Sex Anime Sex http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/12/brooks-on-blogs/comment-page-4/#comment-4747018 Sex Gay Sex Anime Sex Sat, 05 Apr 2008 09:16:07 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/12/brooks-on-blogs/#comment-4747018 <strong>Sex Gay Sex Anime Sex</strong> I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view Sex Gay Sex Anime Sex

I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view

]]> By: Consolidation Consolidation http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/12/brooks-on-blogs/comment-page-4/#comment-4696232 Consolidation Consolidation Wed, 02 Apr 2008 15:14:47 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/12/brooks-on-blogs/#comment-4696232 <strong>Consolidation Consolidation</strong> Credit card consolidation with consolidation offers that helps with primary consolidation. Consolidation Consolidation

Credit card consolidation with consolidation offers that helps with primary consolidation.

]]> By: JollyRoger http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/12/brooks-on-blogs/comment-page-4/#comment-1957316 JollyRoger Thu, 01 Mar 2007 05:25:44 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/12/brooks-on-blogs/#comment-1957316 If you really want a good belly laugh, read this "<a href="http://www.imao.us/archives/007244.html" rel="nofollow">frank analysis</a>" of left blogs from one of the most ding-dong nutjobs in the blogosphere. The comments are even better-they prove that there are even foamier-mouthed wingnuts reading. The collective IQ of the poster and the readers combined wouldn't light a 10 watt bulb. If you really want a good belly laugh, read this “frank analysis” of left blogs from one of the most ding-dong nutjobs in the blogosphere.

The comments are even better-they prove that there are even foamier-mouthed wingnuts reading. The collective IQ of the poster and the readers combined wouldn’t light a 10 watt bulb.

]]> By: tMPcHYfGcw http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/12/brooks-on-blogs/comment-page-4/#comment-1006633 tMPcHYfGcw Thu, 19 Oct 2006 15:12:50 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/12/brooks-on-blogs/#comment-1006633 5fpC32wMmTjs Dja9HCasf8I iWejs60DS1 5fpC32wMmTjs Dja9HCasf8I iWejs60DS1

]]> By: I’ve got yer media bias right here at PunkAssBlog.com http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/12/brooks-on-blogs/comment-page-4/#comment-716497 I’ve got yer media bias right here at PunkAssBlog.com Wed, 09 Aug 2006 15:02:07 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/12/brooks-on-blogs/#comment-716497 [...] Remember what David Brooks said on the Chris Matthews Show? DAVID BROOKS: Whoever the Democratic candidate, that is the weakness of the Democratic party, they’ve got the blogs and the netroots who are semi-nuts and they insist on a Stalinist line of discipline. [...] [...] Remember what David Brooks said on the Chris Matthews Show? DAVID BROOKS: Whoever the Democratic candidate, that is the weakness of the Democratic party, they’ve got the blogs and the netroots who are semi-nuts and they insist on a Stalinist line of discipline. [...]

]]> By: daveyo http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/12/brooks-on-blogs/comment-page-4/#comment-482796 daveyo Wed, 22 Mar 2006 14:28:58 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/12/brooks-on-blogs/#comment-482796 One of the most helpful tools in Florida for the Republican Party is the liberal blogs. When you do a search for various candidates a liberal blog will be listed with some out rageous comment. Thus those trying to find out information about a candidate cannot find real fact, just this whacked out stuff. So please keep blogging we could not pay enough for this internet help that you supply for free. One of the most helpful tools in Florida for the Republican Party is the liberal blogs. When you do a search for various candidates a liberal blog will be listed with some out rageous comment. Thus those trying to find out information about a candidate cannot find real fact, just this whacked out stuff. So please keep blogging we could not pay enough for this internet help that you supply for free.

]]> By: Jude http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/12/brooks-on-blogs/comment-page-4/#comment-448492 Jude Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:39:07 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/12/brooks-on-blogs/#comment-448492 I have an idea.Let's ask the New York Times to replace David Brooks with <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5164608" rel="nofollow">Albert Brooks </a>for a while. David needs a breather. My comments about Brooks' comments are <a href="http://iddybud.blogspot.com/2006_02_13_iddybud_archive.html#113986635939152811" rel="nofollow">here</a>. It's interesting that Brooks chose to say this on the Chris Matthews show. Two poor bruised ego cases who party with the elite while being paid handsomely acting as amanuenses for the Oval Office. We watch them become the new shadows of the once-great journalists like Walter Cronkite and Edward R. Murrow. I have an idea.Let’s ask the New York Times to replace David Brooks with Albert Brooks for a while. David needs a breather.

My comments about Brooks’ comments are here.

It’s interesting that Brooks chose to say this on the Chris Matthews show. Two poor bruised ego cases who party with the elite while being paid handsomely acting as amanuenses for the Oval Office. We watch them become the new shadows of the once-great journalists like Walter Cronkite and Edward R. Murrow.

]]> By: The Moderate Voice http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/12/brooks-on-blogs/comment-page-4/#comment-447753 The Moderate Voice Tue, 14 Feb 2006 17:04:24 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/12/brooks-on-blogs/#comment-447753 <strong>I Want To See David Brooks' Psychoanalytic Data...</strong> Hey, if he has the proof that liberal blogs are Stalinistic...let's see the metrics:DAVID BROOKS: Whoever the Democratic candidate, that is the weakness of the Democratic party, they’ve got the blogs and the netroots who are semi-n...... I Want To See David Brooks’ Psychoanalytic Data…

Hey, if he has the proof that liberal blogs are Stalinistic…let’s see the metrics:DAVID BROOKS: Whoever the Democratic candidate, that is the weakness of the Democratic party, they’ve got the blogs and the netroots who are semi-n……

]]> By: mighty aphrodite http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/12/brooks-on-blogs/comment-page-4/#comment-447276 mighty aphrodite Mon, 13 Feb 2006 23:31:11 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/12/brooks-on-blogs/#comment-447276 #150 - For once, Cyra you sound intelligent!!! Who did he test?? But where was you skepticism when RumPunch was discussing the hilariously concocted story about partisans? As usual liberal hypocrisy is easily spotted and quickly debunked. #150 – For once, Cyra you sound intelligent!!! Who did he test?? But where was you skepticism when RumPunch was discussing the hilariously concocted story about partisans? As usual liberal hypocrisy is easily spotted and quickly debunked.

]]> By: mighty aphrodite http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/12/brooks-on-blogs/comment-page-3/#comment-447092 mighty aphrodite Mon, 13 Feb 2006 21:07:08 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/12/brooks-on-blogs/#comment-447092 Fat Papa - I don't care who you 'do' - TMI!!! I read lots from the left, lots from the right - you should expand your limited horizon. Fat Papa – I don’t care who you ‘do’ – TMI!!! I read lots from the left, lots from the right – you should expand your limited horizon.

]]> By: Donklephant » Blog Archive » I Want To See David Brooks’ Psychoanalytic Data http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/12/brooks-on-blogs/comment-page-3/#comment-446997 Donklephant » Blog Archive » I Want To See David Brooks’ Psychoanalytic Data Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:54:01 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/12/brooks-on-blogs/#comment-446997 [...] You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your ownsite. [...] [...] You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your ownsite. [...]

]]> By: Elan http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/12/brooks-on-blogs/comment-page-3/#comment-446897 Elan Mon, 13 Feb 2006 18:19:23 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/12/brooks-on-blogs/#comment-446897 In both the NY times, and the Washington post, it seemed like this guy had his argument heard, where as they'd aspect you to be reading the blogs they were talking about to see what they meant by their acquisitions. Maybe he was calling them that because them being liberal would make them less of a buddy with the negative aspects of capitalism, and he wanted to call them Stalinist, even though Stalin was a totalitarian leader and not much of a communist, ideally communism would result in everyone being equal, but problems occur like Stalin, so I don't feel like he would be accurately representing them if he was calling them Stalinist for that reason. I mean calling them Stalinist would imply that they liked Stalin's regime. I mean, at least call them Castroist. At least he has health care for all of his citizens, a 98% literacy rate, and imports more doctors then any other country. I mean he said communists in that respect, then ok that makes sense, but if he saying that all liberal bloggers prefer someone worse then Saddam Hussein? That's just retarded. I would aspect more out of someone writing for the New York times..I mean, does he know what a totalitarian leader is? Well, if you go to that link and are bothered by it reading what the guy posted under it is pretty refreshing. I can't believe he aspects to use big words like "It's objectively true. I did a psychoanalytic test." After the non-sense he just said, I mean how can say that what he says is true when it isn't, then he wants to use a magically test to have some rational way of proving it, I mean. The nerve of him and his degrading view of the public. I mean not only does he look like a complete hypocrite even taking that argument especially after its the one we generally use to our advantage. I just can't believe that this guy is in the paper. In both the NY times, and the Washington post, it seemed like this guy had his argument heard, where as they’d aspect you to be reading the blogs they were talking about to see what they meant by their acquisitions. Maybe he was calling them that because them being liberal would make them less of a buddy with the negative aspects of capitalism, and he wanted to call them Stalinist, even though Stalin was a totalitarian leader and not much of a communist, ideally communism would result in everyone being equal, but problems occur like Stalin, so I don’t feel like he would be accurately representing them if he was calling them Stalinist for that reason. I mean calling them Stalinist would imply that they liked Stalin’s regime. I mean, at least call them Castroist. At least he has health care for all of his citizens, a 98% literacy rate, and imports more doctors then any other country. I mean he said communists in that respect, then ok that makes sense, but if he saying that all liberal bloggers prefer someone worse then Saddam Hussein? That’s just retarded. I would aspect more out of someone writing for the New York times..I mean, does he know what a totalitarian leader is? Well, if you go to that link and are bothered by it reading what the guy posted under it is pretty refreshing. I can’t believe he aspects to use big words like “It’s objectively true. I did a psychoanalytic test.” After the non-sense he just said, I mean how can say that what he says is true when it isn’t, then he wants to use a magically test to have some rational way of proving it, I mean. The nerve of him and his degrading view of the public. I mean not only does he look like a complete hypocrite even taking that argument especially after its the one we generally use to our advantage. I just can’t believe that this guy is in the paper.

]]> By: big papa http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/12/brooks-on-blogs/comment-page-3/#comment-446891 big papa Mon, 13 Feb 2006 18:14:43 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/12/brooks-on-blogs/#comment-446891 I don't do David Brooks... ...just like I don't do Coulter, Limphog, O'Liely, Scum Vannity et al.... I don’t do David Brooks…

…just like I don’t do Coulter, Limphog, O’Liely, Scum Vannity et al….

]]> By: Big Ink » Blog Archive » Psycho Analysis http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/12/brooks-on-blogs/comment-page-3/#comment-446764 Big Ink » Blog Archive » Psycho Analysis Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:58:10 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/12/brooks-on-blogs/#comment-446764 [...] David Brooks knows the truth about blogs (via ThinkProgress.org): DAVID BROOKS: Whoever the Democratic candidate, that is the weakness of the Democratic party, they’ve got the blogs and the netroots who are semi-nuts and they insist on a Stalinist line of discipline. [...] [...] David Brooks knows the truth about blogs (via ThinkProgress.org): DAVID BROOKS: Whoever the Democratic candidate, that is the weakness of the Democratic party, they’ve got the blogs and the netroots who are semi-nuts and they insist on a Stalinist line of discipline. [...]

]]> By: Cyra Brown http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/12/brooks-on-blogs/comment-page-3/#comment-446597 Cyra Brown Mon, 13 Feb 2006 09:34:09 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/12/brooks-on-blogs/#comment-446597 And what the devil does "objectively true" mean? And what the devil does “objectively true” mean?

]]> By: Cyra Brown http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/12/brooks-on-blogs/comment-page-3/#comment-446596 Cyra Brown Mon, 13 Feb 2006 09:31:31 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/12/brooks-on-blogs/#comment-446596 I don't seem to recall Mr. Brooks ever revealing any credentials he may have, that make him qualified, in any way whatsoever to perform psychoanalytic tests, with the clear intent to use the "results" to justify his point of view. Can he provide this test? Any profiles of the "subjects" tested? Any actual proof of this event even happening? Or are we just supposed to "trust him"? Sorry, Charlie... no can do. Put up, or shut up. What an ass. I don’t seem to recall Mr. Brooks ever revealing any credentials he may have, that make him qualified, in any way whatsoever to perform psychoanalytic tests, with the clear intent to use the “results” to justify his point of view. Can he provide this test? Any profiles of the “subjects” tested? Any actual proof of this event even happening? Or are we just supposed to “trust him”? Sorry, Charlie… no can do. Put up, or shut up. What an ass.

]]> By: EasyRider http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/12/brooks-on-blogs/comment-page-3/#comment-446498 EasyRider Mon, 13 Feb 2006 04:34:09 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/12/brooks-on-blogs/#comment-446498 By the way, Bobo: I’m a trained psychologist. Just because you know an analyst, it does not qualify you to sling analytic bullshit. Comment by Pachacutec Hey he visits one ever chance he gets, but maybe not as often as needed. By the way, Bobo: I’m a trained psychologist. Just because you know an analyst, it does not qualify you to sling analytic bullshit.

Comment by Pachacutec

Hey he visits one ever chance he gets, but maybe not as often as needed.

]]> By: Marie http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/12/brooks-on-blogs/comment-page-3/#comment-446489 Marie Mon, 13 Feb 2006 04:06:26 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/12/brooks-on-blogs/#comment-446489 Is this how Republicans and their toadies act when they realize their ship is sinking because their incompetent captain has delusions of grandeur? Brooks (and Roberts) today are desperately flailing in the waters. Brooks has followed the Fox-TV, Limbaugh,Coulter crowd -- when you can't defend your man, just lob rocks at the opposition. Is this how Republicans and their toadies act when they realize their ship is sinking because their incompetent captain has delusions of grandeur? Brooks (and Roberts) today are desperately flailing in the waters.
Brooks has followed the Fox-TV, Limbaugh,Coulter crowd — when you can’t defend your man, just lob rocks at the opposition.

]]>