<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Alcohol and Cheney&#8217;s Hunting Accident: Armstrong Can&#8217;t Keep Her Story Straight</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/15/alcohol-armstrong-story/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/15/alcohol-armstrong-story/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 09:15:46 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: LizDexic</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/15/alcohol-armstrong-story/comment-page-3/#comment-451605</link>
		<dc:creator>LizDexic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2006 06:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/15/alcohol-armstrong-story/#comment-451605</guid>
		<description>Trueblue....go check out FAIR.org&#039;s web posting about that ABC story. They left out an important part...that the people speaking said the weapons HAD BEEN DESTROYED. Plus, this was a tape from 1995. So, not only did the Bush administration people who saw this video ignore the important part of it, ABC did too.

AND...about Cheney being an alcoholic...he was kicked out of college for drinking. HOW much does one have to drink to get kicked out of *college* for it, for chrissake.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trueblue&#8230;.go check out FAIR.org&#8217;s web posting about that ABC story. They left out an important part&#8230;that the people speaking said the weapons HAD BEEN DESTROYED. Plus, this was a tape from 1995. So, not only did the Bush administration people who saw this video ignore the important part of it, ABC did too.</p>
<p>AND&#8230;about Cheney being an alcoholic&#8230;he was kicked out of college for drinking. HOW much does one have to drink to get kicked out of *college* for it, for chrissake.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=451605', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fledermaus</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/15/alcohol-armstrong-story/comment-page-3/#comment-451423</link>
		<dc:creator>fledermaus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2006 19:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/15/alcohol-armstrong-story/#comment-451423</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve seen Whittington press conference video twice now. And I&#039;ve got to ask, is it just my tired old eyes? Or is anybody else missing any scars a recent shot in the face with a shotgun would most certainly leave. Or is he really Odo, the shape shifter from the sci-fi universe? Of course there wouldn&#039;t be any reason to fake the whole thing to divert the attention away from what is in PLAME sight, would it? Just curious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve seen Whittington press conference video twice now. And I&#8217;ve got to ask, is it just my tired old eyes? Or is anybody else missing any scars a recent shot in the face with a shotgun would most certainly leave. Or is he really Odo, the shape shifter from the sci-fi universe? Of course there wouldn&#8217;t be any reason to fake the whole thing to divert the attention away from what is in PLAME sight, would it? Just curious.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=451423', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Meyers</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/15/alcohol-armstrong-story/comment-page-3/#comment-451416</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Meyers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2006 18:39:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/15/alcohol-armstrong-story/#comment-451416</guid>
		<description>What is wrong with this picture?? This is just another typical famous person trying to cover thier tracks.
Right in line with OJ and Michael Jackson. How much is this going to cost Cheney? 
Bottom Line: Does anyone think any other American&#039;s would get away with illegal activity as Drinking and Hunting, then not reporting the incident until Cheney had a drink to cover up the evidence. All the while OUR BRAVE TROOPS are being led into battle for what???? To honor a leadership that disgraces thier own Country???  
   America is loosing respect around the world because of this foolishness. May the world know that the majority of Americans are starting to wake up and hopefully take action to stop the inner destruction of this country.
   This is not political, this is just standing up for what is honest and true. Elected official or not. If we ran our personnal finances like our country is being led right now, you can bet we would be in jail for righting bad checks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is wrong with this picture?? This is just another typical famous person trying to cover thier tracks.<br />
Right in line with OJ and Michael Jackson. How much is this going to cost Cheney?<br />
Bottom Line: Does anyone think any other American&#8217;s would get away with illegal activity as Drinking and Hunting, then not reporting the incident until Cheney had a drink to cover up the evidence. All the while OUR BRAVE TROOPS are being led into battle for what???? To honor a leadership that disgraces thier own Country???<br />
   America is loosing respect around the world because of this foolishness. May the world know that the majority of Americans are starting to wake up and hopefully take action to stop the inner destruction of this country.<br />
   This is not political, this is just standing up for what is honest and true. Elected official or not. If we ran our personnal finances like our country is being led right now, you can bet we would be in jail for righting bad checks.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=451416', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MW</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/15/alcohol-armstrong-story/comment-page-3/#comment-450511</link>
		<dc:creator>MW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/15/alcohol-armstrong-story/#comment-450511</guid>
		<description>Oh Brother.....The only thing that stands out to me in this story is that &lt;strong&gt;Cheney Lies! Period!&lt;/strong&gt; If it isn&#039;t clear, I don&#039;t know what is!! 

If the White House, and all the inconsistant &quot;statements&quot; from the &quot;experts eye witnesses&quot; around this basic little story doesn&#039;t point out the obvious. 

They &lt;strong&gt;KNOWINGLY LIE&lt;/strong&gt; and decieve.

His obvious ...screw you...you can&#039;t touch me attitude is embarassing.

If they (Cheney handlers)  will go to this length to cover up, confuse and lie about this...imagine (wink wink) what is happening with everything else!

For the last 5 years Republicans have been defending this moron and the rest of this administration. They suggest that on every &quot;inconsistant instance&quot; that either it was &quot;faulty&quot; information or someone elses fault. They continue to point out over and over again that they never &quot;misled&#039; anyone...the real truth is they &lt;strong&gt;LIED.&lt;/strong&gt;

This administration has &quot;zero zip zulch&quot; credibility!! Charge this man.
 Enough already.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh Brother&#8230;..The only thing that stands out to me in this story is that <strong>Cheney Lies! Period!</strong> If it isn&#8217;t clear, I don&#8217;t know what is!! </p>
<p>If the White House, and all the inconsistant &#8220;statements&#8221; from the &#8220;experts eye witnesses&#8221; around this basic little story doesn&#8217;t point out the obvious. </p>
<p>They <strong>KNOWINGLY LIE</strong> and decieve.</p>
<p>His obvious &#8230;screw you&#8230;you can&#8217;t touch me attitude is embarassing.</p>
<p>If they (Cheney handlers)  will go to this length to cover up, confuse and lie about this&#8230;imagine (wink wink) what is happening with everything else!</p>
<p>For the last 5 years Republicans have been defending this moron and the rest of this administration. They suggest that on every &#8220;inconsistant instance&#8221; that either it was &#8220;faulty&#8221; information or someone elses fault. They continue to point out over and over again that they never &#8220;misled&#8217; anyone&#8230;the real truth is they <strong>LIED.</strong></p>
<p>This administration has &#8220;zero zip zulch&#8221; credibility!! Charge this man.<br />
 Enough already.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=450511', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lcohol and Cheneyâ€™s Hunting Accident: Armstrong Canâ€™t Keep Her Story Straight - Brokekid.net</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/15/alcohol-armstrong-story/comment-page-3/#comment-449714</link>
		<dc:creator>lcohol and Cheneyâ€™s Hunting Accident: Armstrong Canâ€™t Keep Her Story Straight - Brokekid.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 20:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/15/alcohol-armstrong-story/#comment-449714</guid>
		<description>[...] (via thinkprogres.org)  It seems, Katharine Armstrong â€“ the â€œstar witnessâ€ to Cheneyâ€™s hunting accident â€“ canâ€™t keep her story straight: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (via thinkprogres.org)  It seems, Katharine Armstrong â€“ the â€œstar witnessâ€ to Cheneyâ€™s hunting accident â€“ canâ€™t keep her story straight: [...]<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=449714', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GGG</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/15/alcohol-armstrong-story/comment-page-3/#comment-449713</link>
		<dc:creator>GGG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 20:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/15/alcohol-armstrong-story/#comment-449713</guid>
		<description>Uncle Sam, 

We don&#039;t know what Cheney was shooting or what kind of rounds loaded with what kind of shot he was firing because whatever happened was covered up. Period.

Spudge,

The original M16, Nam era, was a full auto weapon. That caused the tubes to overheat and burn out quick, the rifling was gone and that led to the dum-dum effect of the rounds. The 3 round burst was implemented to alleviate that problem. Now while it is true that the weight in grains of your standard .223 round is very light, 155, I think, as compared to the heavier weight of the NATO 7.62 projectile, the muzzle velocity of the M 16 is almost 4000 fps and it has a very high penetration. The problem is that it&#039;s mass is so low that most of the energy is expended at the strike point and it is easily deflected by bone or other internal structures with mass. This also leads to the phenomenon you speak off but don&#039;t kid yourself. That round can go through a couple of people at close range.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uncle Sam, </p>
<p>We don&#8217;t know what Cheney was shooting or what kind of rounds loaded with what kind of shot he was firing because whatever happened was covered up. Period.</p>
<p>Spudge,</p>
<p>The original M16, Nam era, was a full auto weapon. That caused the tubes to overheat and burn out quick, the rifling was gone and that led to the dum-dum effect of the rounds. The 3 round burst was implemented to alleviate that problem. Now while it is true that the weight in grains of your standard .223 round is very light, 155, I think, as compared to the heavier weight of the NATO 7.62 projectile, the muzzle velocity of the M 16 is almost 4000 fps and it has a very high penetration. The problem is that it&#8217;s mass is so low that most of the energy is expended at the strike point and it is easily deflected by bone or other internal structures with mass. This also leads to the phenomenon you speak off but don&#8217;t kid yourself. That round can go through a couple of people at close range.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=449713', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JosÃ© Chicas</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/15/alcohol-armstrong-story/comment-page-3/#comment-449634</link>
		<dc:creator>JosÃ© Chicas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 18:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/15/alcohol-armstrong-story/#comment-449634</guid>
		<description>www.avengingangels.org</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.avengingangels.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.avengingangels.org</a><a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=449634', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JosÃ© Chicas</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/15/alcohol-armstrong-story/comment-page-3/#comment-449633</link>
		<dc:creator>JosÃ© Chicas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 18:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/15/alcohol-armstrong-story/#comment-449633</guid>
		<description>&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.avengingangels.org/images/AA%20MIsc./AA_CHENEYRev.gif&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; /&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.avengingangels.org/images/AA%20MIsc./AA_CHENEYRev.gif" alt="" /><a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=449633', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JosÃ© Chicas</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/15/alcohol-armstrong-story/comment-page-3/#comment-449632</link>
		<dc:creator>JosÃ© Chicas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 18:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/15/alcohol-armstrong-story/#comment-449632</guid>
		<description>www.avengingangels.org

http://www.avengingangels.org/images/AA%20MIsc./AA_CHENEYRev.gif</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.avengingangels.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.avengingangels.org</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.avengingangels.org/images/AA%20MIsc./AA_CHENEYRev.gif" rel="nofollow">http://www.avengingangels.org/images/AA%20MIsc./AA_CHENEYRev.gif</a><a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=449632', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry the MD</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/15/alcohol-armstrong-story/comment-page-3/#comment-449528</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry the MD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 17:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/15/alcohol-armstrong-story/#comment-449528</guid>
		<description>Uncle Sam: Where did the&lt;em&gt; 5mm shot pellet &lt;/em&gt;come from?
I&#039;m pretty sure that no pellet that size would be loaded in 28 gauge shot gun shells. That is closer to one of the smaller buck shot loads like 0-Buck or 4-0 Buck, which are unlikely to be loaded in 28 ga. shells, as they are most often used in 12 ga. riot guns by peace officers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uncle Sam: Where did the<em> 5mm shot pellet </em>come from?<br />
I&#8217;m pretty sure that no pellet that size would be loaded in 28 gauge shot gun shells. That is closer to one of the smaller buck shot loads like 0-Buck or 4-0 Buck, which are unlikely to be loaded in 28 ga. shells, as they are most often used in 12 ga. riot guns by peace officers.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=449528', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spudge_Boy</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/15/alcohol-armstrong-story/comment-page-3/#comment-449517</link>
		<dc:creator>Spudge_Boy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 17:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/15/alcohol-armstrong-story/#comment-449517</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Now, I canâ€™t make it any more clear. Armstrongâ€™s story DOESNâ€™T change. This is a crap article and Iâ€™m disappointed with Think Progress, whoâ€™s work is usually stellar.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I will agree with your point, but it doesn&#039;t make it a crap story, it makes it a crap headline as you pointed out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Now, I canâ€™t make it any more clear. Armstrongâ€™s story DOESNâ€™T change. This is a crap article and Iâ€™m disappointed with Think Progress, whoâ€™s work is usually stellar.</p></blockquote>
<p>I will agree with your point, but it doesn&#8217;t make it a crap story, it makes it a crap headline as you pointed out.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=449517', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spudge_Boy</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/15/alcohol-armstrong-story/comment-page-3/#comment-449513</link>
		<dc:creator>Spudge_Boy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 17:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/15/alcohol-armstrong-story/#comment-449513</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I think we can safely rule out a .223, since that would have gone all the way through the man and disappeared in the distance.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Uncle Sam,

I was in the US Army and was trained on the M-16A2. The .223 round from an M16-A2 would not go all the way through a man, just as a standard .22 long rifle wouldn&#039;t. They are notorious for bouncing around inside of people. Sometimes they come out, but no in the front of you shoulder, say and out the back. More like in the front of your shoulder and out by your kidney.

You could make the round go in the front of a shoulder and out the back of that shoulder, but the person would have to be very very close.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I think we can safely rule out a .223, since that would have gone all the way through the man and disappeared in the distance.</p></blockquote>
<p>Uncle Sam,</p>
<p>I was in the US Army and was trained on the M-16A2. The .223 round from an M16-A2 would not go all the way through a man, just as a standard .22 long rifle wouldn&#8217;t. They are notorious for bouncing around inside of people. Sometimes they come out, but no in the front of you shoulder, say and out the back. More like in the front of your shoulder and out by your kidney.</p>
<p>You could make the round go in the front of a shoulder and out the back of that shoulder, but the person would have to be very very close.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=449513', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spudge_Boy</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/15/alcohol-armstrong-story/comment-page-3/#comment-449506</link>
		<dc:creator>Spudge_Boy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/15/alcohol-armstrong-story/#comment-449506</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;ThinkProgress seems a bit obsessed about the Cheney story.

Although it should be noted that all claims that Valerie Plame was outed were just shredded tonight.

Vice President Cheney mentioned that he has the power to declassify classified information.

And I believe that opens up the possibility that if information about Plame was classified, then it was declassified in 2003 to allow for the legal disclosure of Plameâ€™s role in the Joe Wilson story. 

Comment by Gary Ruppert â€” February 15, 2006 @ 10:46 pm&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Oh boy, I hope you are going with Cheney on the leak, because, it has been proven that Plame was not only under cover when she was outed, but she was also working on Irans nuclear weapons program. You know, the US&#039; next target.

If we get screwed by Iran, it will directly be Cheney&#039;s fault.

Keep rooting for Cheney did it. I am 100% behind you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>ThinkProgress seems a bit obsessed about the Cheney story.</p>
<p>Although it should be noted that all claims that Valerie Plame was outed were just shredded tonight.</p>
<p>Vice President Cheney mentioned that he has the power to declassify classified information.</p>
<p>And I believe that opens up the possibility that if information about Plame was classified, then it was declassified in 2003 to allow for the legal disclosure of Plameâ€™s role in the Joe Wilson story. </p>
<p>Comment by Gary Ruppert â€” February 15, 2006 @ 10:46 pm</p></blockquote>
<p>Oh boy, I hope you are going with Cheney on the leak, because, it has been proven that Plame was not only under cover when she was outed, but she was also working on Irans nuclear weapons program. You know, the US&#8217; next target.</p>
<p>If we get screwed by Iran, it will directly be Cheney&#8217;s fault.</p>
<p>Keep rooting for Cheney did it. I am 100% behind you.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=449506', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uncle Sam</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/15/alcohol-armstrong-story/comment-page-3/#comment-449499</link>
		<dc:creator>Uncle Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/15/alcohol-armstrong-story/#comment-449499</guid>
		<description>The chart I mentioned is at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.shotgunworld.com/amm.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.shotgunworld.com/amm.html&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The chart I mentioned is at <a href="http://www.shotgunworld.com/amm.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.shotgunworld.com/amm.html</a><a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=449499', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uncle Sam</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/15/alcohol-armstrong-story/comment-page-3/#comment-449498</link>
		<dc:creator>Uncle Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/15/alcohol-armstrong-story/#comment-449498</guid>
		<description>GGG - The most powerful 28 gauge shell available, that I can find, is a 2.75 inch shell that fires a one-ounce shot load. There are 50 lead BB pellets in one ounce. There&#039;s a chart at 

Whether the shot in Whittington is really BB and whether BB is available for 28 gauge are entirely different matters. BB is actually 4.57 mm, so 5 is rounding up to the nearest sized shot.

28 gauge is not a widely used bore and the shells can be hard to come by. A lot of people apparently load their own in order to get the load they want.

All this makes for another question. How did Whittington get a BB shot in him when the official report says Cheney was shooting #7 1/2 shot (2.39 mm in diameter,350 to the ounce).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GGG &#8211; The most powerful 28 gauge shell available, that I can find, is a 2.75 inch shell that fires a one-ounce shot load. There are 50 lead BB pellets in one ounce. There&#8217;s a chart at </p>
<p>Whether the shot in Whittington is really BB and whether BB is available for 28 gauge are entirely different matters. BB is actually 4.57 mm, so 5 is rounding up to the nearest sized shot.</p>
<p>28 gauge is not a widely used bore and the shells can be hard to come by. A lot of people apparently load their own in order to get the load they want.</p>
<p>All this makes for another question. How did Whittington get a BB shot in him when the official report says Cheney was shooting #7 1/2 shot (2.39 mm in diameter,350 to the ounce).<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=449498', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry the MD</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/15/alcohol-armstrong-story/comment-page-3/#comment-449495</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry the MD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/15/alcohol-armstrong-story/#comment-449495</guid>
		<description>I believe that almost every state has laws requiring that all medical facilities &lt;strong&gt;report all gunshot wounds immediately. &lt;/strong&gt;Is Corpus Christi exempt?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that almost every state has laws requiring that all medical facilities <strong>report all gunshot wounds immediately. </strong>Is Corpus Christi exempt?<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=449495', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GGG</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/15/alcohol-armstrong-story/comment-page-3/#comment-449471</link>
		<dc:creator>GGG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/15/alcohol-armstrong-story/#comment-449471</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;126: I think we can safely rule out a .223, since that would have gone all the way through the man and disappeared in the distance. A shotgun shell loaded with BB shot is more likely, but it still begs the question of how Whittington could have been hit with so many. A 28 guage with BB shot only holds 50 pellets max. 

Comment by Uncle Sam &lt;/em&gt;

I was only telling you that 5 mm is about the diameter of a .22. There are even kits for AR 15s to convert them to fire .22 longrifle. You don&#039;t have to even mod the barrel. The number of pellets depends on the size of the shot and if the gun is chambered for reg or magnum rounds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>126: I think we can safely rule out a .223, since that would have gone all the way through the man and disappeared in the distance. A shotgun shell loaded with BB shot is more likely, but it still begs the question of how Whittington could have been hit with so many. A 28 guage with BB shot only holds 50 pellets max. </p>
<p>Comment by Uncle Sam </em></p>
<p>I was only telling you that 5 mm is about the diameter of a .22. There are even kits for AR 15s to convert them to fire .22 longrifle. You don&#8217;t have to even mod the barrel. The number of pellets depends on the size of the shot and if the gun is chambered for reg or magnum rounds.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=449471', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WaltTheMan</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/15/alcohol-armstrong-story/comment-page-3/#comment-449469</link>
		<dc:creator>WaltTheMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/15/alcohol-armstrong-story/#comment-449469</guid>
		<description>#124 - Uncle Sam,
The Great White Hunter has weak teeth, he prefers to pregrind his game in the field.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#124 &#8211; Uncle Sam,<br />
The Great White Hunter has weak teeth, he prefers to pregrind his game in the field.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=449469', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: criticalThinker</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/15/alcohol-armstrong-story/comment-page-3/#comment-449443</link>
		<dc:creator>criticalThinker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/15/alcohol-armstrong-story/#comment-449443</guid>
		<description>#106,
you make a good point, if the title of the article was, &quot;Armstrong and Cheney tell different story&quot;, I would shut up.  But it&#039;s not.  The title is, &quot;Armstrong Canâ€™t Keep Her Story Straight&quot;.  But Armstrong&#039;s story is consistent.  It disagrees with Cheney&#039;s (on some points not even mentioned - did she discuss with Cheney that she would talk to the press? Armstrong - no, Cheney - yes).
Now, I can&#039;t make it any more clear.  Armstrong&#039;s story DOESN&#039;T change.  This is a crap article and I&#039;m disappointed with Think Progress, who&#039;s work is usually stellar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#106,<br />
you make a good point, if the title of the article was, &#8220;Armstrong and Cheney tell different story&#8221;, I would shut up.  But it&#8217;s not.  The title is, &#8220;Armstrong Canâ€™t Keep Her Story Straight&#8221;.  But Armstrong&#8217;s story is consistent.  It disagrees with Cheney&#8217;s (on some points not even mentioned &#8211; did she discuss with Cheney that she would talk to the press? Armstrong &#8211; no, Cheney &#8211; yes).<br />
Now, I can&#8217;t make it any more clear.  Armstrong&#8217;s story DOESN&#8217;T change.  This is a crap article and I&#8217;m disappointed with Think Progress, who&#8217;s work is usually stellar.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=449443', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rio de los Ladrones</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/15/alcohol-armstrong-story/comment-page-3/#comment-449400</link>
		<dc:creator>Rio de los Ladrones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/15/alcohol-armstrong-story/#comment-449400</guid>
		<description>If Rove had to be the one to get dick fudd to say something, it only confirms who is really running the regime. Burger Boy is doing ads for corporate health/drugs/and fries, just reading the script like a good little &#039;Georgie McCarthy&#039;
 (No offense to Mr. Bergen)
 I am holding out for nothing less than sworn testimony from the Ambassador to Switzerland, the attendant Secret Service personnel, and Ms. Armstrong. Oh, and of course, the victim Mr. Witthington.
 Your support and voices will be appreciated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Rove had to be the one to get dick fudd to say something, it only confirms who is really running the regime. Burger Boy is doing ads for corporate health/drugs/and fries, just reading the script like a good little &#8216;Georgie McCarthy&#8217;<br />
 (No offense to Mr. Bergen)<br />
 I am holding out for nothing less than sworn testimony from the Ambassador to Switzerland, the attendant Secret Service personnel, and Ms. Armstrong. Oh, and of course, the victim Mr. Witthington.<br />
 Your support and voices will be appreciated.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=449400', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
