MSNBC’s Missing Paragraph Reappears; Reporter Misled By VP’s Office
MSNBC’s Missing Paragraph Reappears; Reporter Misled By VP’s Office
Last night, MSNBC scrubbed a paragraph about alcohol from an online article about Cheney’s hunting accident:
Now, they’ve restored the paragraph, slightly reworked:
In a recorded, on-the-record phone call with NBC News, Armstrong said that beer may have been available at lunch that day. “If someone wants to help themselves to a beer,” she said, “they may, but I did not see anyone do that,” Armstrong says. She says she was not sure if there were beers in the coolers but wasn’t ready to rule it out: “There may be a beer or two in there, but remember not everyone in the party was shooting,” she told NBC News.
The story also now suggests that the White House misled MSNBC about whether Cheney had consumed alcohol. A new paragraph from the revised article:
NBC News called the vice president’s office for comment four times Tuesday and Wednesday and asked whether the vice president or anyone in the hunting party had consumed any alcohol on Saturday prior to the accident. In an e-mail statement Wednesday to NBC News, the vice president’s press secretary referred NBC News to the Kenedy County Sheriff’s Department report on the incident.
The sheriff’s report says “there was no alcohol…involved in the incident.” Cheney told Brit Hume that he drank beer prior to the accident.
Question: Did the White House pressure MSNBC to remove the paragraph last night?
Topic Cloud
ArchivesBlog Roll
Shouldn’t that be enough to get the investigation started?
February 15th, 2006 at 4:45 pm“There may be a beer or two in there, but remember not everyone in the party was shooting,â€
Yea, but was the party dick shooting?
February 15th, 2006 at 4:45 pmAs I said before, all the Armstrongs have to do is snap there fingers and everyone dances in Kenedy county.
February 15th, 2006 at 4:47 pmTheir, not there, but there in Kenedy county.
February 15th, 2006 at 4:48 pmQuestion: Did the White House pressure MSNBC to remove the paragraph last night?
No, of course not unless you consider a re-evaluation of their FCC license to be pressure. The Vast Right Wing Conspiracy hold all the cards and knows where all the bodies are buried. (because we buried them) There is nothing put out by the MSM in this country and around the world that isn’t OK’d by agents of the Tri-lateral Council on Allowable Human Knowledge.
February 15th, 2006 at 4:50 pmKeith Olbermann, if you’re out there, and I suspect you are, you’ll tell us what happened here, won’t you?
Good boy.
(Sorry, I was watching the dog shows these last two nights.)
February 15th, 2006 at 4:52 pmAttention All Americans:
We Have Nothing Left to Offer You But Lies.
Thanks
-The Whitehouse
February 15th, 2006 at 4:52 pmWe’ll see, I-RIGHT-I. I imagine MSNBC will have something to say about this, and I’ll be interested if they were contacted by the administration.
February 15th, 2006 at 4:52 pmBy god eunuch, you are being a clever boychild today!
“The Vast Right Wing Conspiracy hold all the cards and knows where all the bodies are buried. (because we buried them)”
February 15th, 2006 at 4:53 pmThe White House has punked NBC news more than once.
Why wouldn’t they do it again?
February 15th, 2006 at 4:55 pmHeck you guys jes don’t know Texan. Down here when we say beer, it means anything from one to one dozen beers. Ever see those videos of police chases on TV? When they pull the drunk driver over he always admits to having a “beer”.
It’s sort of a generalization, if you only drank Bud, you just had “A Beer”, if you drank Bud and Coors, you had a couple of beers. Understand?
February 15th, 2006 at 4:57 pmLOL! Incredible, just incredible!
February 15th, 2006 at 5:01 pm…and miss an opportunity to lie….????
February 15th, 2006 at 5:02 pmAnd those would be vice-presidential size beers if ya know what I mean.
February 15th, 2006 at 5:02 pmCheney was swigging away all day on his flask of Scotch.
VS.
He had a few beers at lunch; could happen to anyone.
I’ll bet on the hard stuff.
February 15th, 2006 at 5:03 pmPerhaps the statement in the Sheriff’s report is meant to imply that no beers were injured in the incident.
February 15th, 2006 at 5:03 pmI urge all potential serial killers to list this woman….just kidding….coulter taught me this.
February 15th, 2006 at 5:03 pmGreat Kos diary detailing the evolving and shifting timeline/witness accounts of the shooting can be read here:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/2/15/71550/5894
February 15th, 2006 at 5:06 pmMaybe one beer, but how many shots of Wild Turkey?
February 15th, 2006 at 5:08 pmIs it really the beer, or is there a spin to distract away from the other woman being there? Pamela Willeford?
February 15th, 2006 at 5:09 pm[...] The veep admitted having one beer with lunch that day, but also said no one had any beer. See Think Progress for more about the amazing appearing and disappearing beer story. Other rumors for which I have no corroboration whatsoever involve women. [...]
February 15th, 2006 at 5:09 pmQuestion: Did the White House pressure MSNBC to remove the paragraph last night?
MSM don’t need to be pressured, they are more than willing to be compliant.
February 15th, 2006 at 5:11 pm[...] MSNBC yesterday quoted ranch owner Katherine Armstrong saying there may have been “a beer or two” available, but she didn’t know if anyone had any to drink. MSNBC deleted the quote about an hour later. You can read about it < “http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/15/nbc-paragraph-reappears/”>here. Once again, I don’t think alcohol is the issue. I know Harry Whittington and I know Katherine Armstrong by reputation, and they are not drinkers. I’ve talked to several reporters today, and they are of the same mind. [...]
February 15th, 2006 at 5:23 pmJust read the Daily Kos (thanks for the directions #18)
February 15th, 2006 at 5:24 pmand the tales keep growing longer, don’t they?
Don’t let this one get away, after all, the phrase is “high crimes and misdemeanors”
Posession of a firearm under the influence of alcohol is a misdemeanor whether you shoot anything or not.
Then again, as Mr. Eisenhower warned us, things can be different in Texas.
Just read the Daily Kos (thanks for the directions #18)
February 15th, 2006 at 5:24 pmand the tales keep growing longer, don’t they?
Don’t let this one get away, after all, the phrase is “high crimes and misdemeanors”
Posession of a firearm under the influence of alcohol is a misdemeanor whether you shoot anything or not.
Then again, as Mr. Eisenhower warned us, things can be different in Texas.
It wouldn’t be a big surprise if NBC volunteered to take the alcohol reference out of its report. Do you think NBC has figured out yet that every member of the hunting group has so far lied about what happened? The only accurate part has been that the lawyer was shot – perhaps that was too obvious to leave out.
February 15th, 2006 at 5:34 pmJust because someone says that Whittington and Armstrong weren’t drinking doesn’t mean the shooter wasn’t drinking.
February 15th, 2006 at 5:34 pmAnd the sheriff obviously didn’t do his job. Duh!
But, because he was a little weasle who was easily intimidated, we will never know, and there you are.
That one beer was one of those mini-kegs that hold about 6 liters.
February 15th, 2006 at 5:34 pmI know Harry Whittington and I know Katherine Armstrong by reputation, and they are not drinkers.
Yeah, but the person everyone is wondering about is Dick Cheney. And he’s now admitted he drank “one” beer.
February 15th, 2006 at 5:35 pmMartin, yes, they “accurately” reported that the lawyer had been lovingly peppered with gummy balls.
February 15th, 2006 at 5:39 pmDoes anyone have a run down on how many times Dead Eye has been arrested for Driving While Intoxicated? What his BAC levels were during the arrests?
When did Cheney stop drinking? Is it true, that after the shooting, Cheney said, “Jesus! I need a stiff drink – and quick!”.
February 15th, 2006 at 5:43 pmOnce again, I don’t think alcohol is the issue. I know Harry Whittington and I know Katherine Armstrong by reputation, and they are not drinkers.
?? Are you trying to make the case that Cheney was drinking? Who’s talking about Armstrong or Whittington?
February 15th, 2006 at 5:43 pm#32,
February 15th, 2006 at 5:45 pmDick Cheney.
I think Whittington’s doctor refused to comment if there was alcohol in his blood (which was cerainly tested at the hospital), and that lends credence to the suspicion that alcohol was involved. (Remember that in this tiny town, nearly all the population works for the Armstrong ranch, so who’s going to talk?)
February 15th, 2006 at 5:48 pmCheney admits to “a beer” — only one? on a hunting trip? no flask in the jacket pocket?
These guys always behave like teenage boys — lying, admitting nothing unless faced with facts (parents) that cannot be denied.
As for MSNBC – they have some ’splainin’ to do.
February 15th, 2006 at 5:49 pmI wonder how long it will take the neo-media to push the theme of “How the angry left’s hate toward a poor sixty eight year old man is way out of line. The VP is the victim here.”
February 15th, 2006 at 5:51 pmAt least Cheney admitted that he did the shooting. I’m suprised that a “random” member of his party didn’t shoot Whittington.
February 15th, 2006 at 5:52 pmAll these different, contradictory and internally-inconsistent accounts are starting to sound like the Texas version of “Rashomon.”
February 15th, 2006 at 5:54 pmBTW — Loosely speaking of reporting news — Ann Coulter is in trouble for voter fraud. She filed a registration form with misinformation.
From the Palm Beach Post:
Coulter voted last week in Palm Beach’s council election. Problem is: She cast her ballot in a precinct 4 miles north of the precinct where she owns a home — and that could be a big no-no.
She wrote down an Indian Road address instead of Seabreeze on her voter’s registration application. And she signed to certify the information as true.
“She never lived here,” said Suzanne Frisbie, owner of the Indian Road home.
February 15th, 2006 at 5:54 pmCouldn’t happen to a nicer person!
#39
Yeah, and her spin will be, “Well, the person who told me it was OK to write down the Indian Road address was a Democrat.”
February 15th, 2006 at 5:59 pmStop telling me the Mainstream Media is compliant with the Bush Administration. There IS NO mainstream media. There are merely Whitehouse Media Outlets.
The only reason the “mainstream media” is reporting this story is so that the mainstream idiots (most Americans) won’t become utterly convinced that the administration (President Cheney and Vice President Rove) control the media.
And they do.
Finally, we always knew that somewhere in Texas a village was missing its idiot, but now a village in Wyoming is as well.
February 15th, 2006 at 6:08 pmTwenty-one posts on this page of my computer and 11 of them are about the Cheney shooting a friend of his. You don’t suppose y’all are obsessing over this do you?
Why do you think that if Cheney has an interview he’s likely to tell the complete and entire truth about what happened? It happened in a Texas county,with people who have every reason to support whatever he says happened,the local sheriff will do what he’s told,Whittington (if he lives,and he is 78 so his odds grow slimmer by the day)won’t dispute what Cheney says.
Good grief,haven’t you ever seen Chinatown? You can’t think stuff like this doesn’t happen everywhere?
Cheney is a secretive guy to begin with who hates the press and he’s sticking it in the White House press corps’ eye by giving Brit Hume (hardly a journalistic paragon)the interview.
February 15th, 2006 at 6:14 pmHow naive.
I believe it will take someone killing a media persona in the name of truth before truth appears……..am I wrong?
February 15th, 2006 at 6:30 pmPlease dont kill anyone in the media because of this post though…..not even Malkin.
“There may be a beer or two in there,” she said, “but remember not everyone in the party was shooting.”
Translation: anybody who drank beer could have gone shooting.
PURE KARL ROVE.
February 15th, 2006 at 7:00 pmTJM, I guess you’d take it more seriously if it was a car driven off a bridge… or even a blowjob.
February 15th, 2006 at 7:38 pmCheney is a dope… If he was drunk or sober Cheney was going to f-up. Look at his stupid explanation on Fox. He just keeps f-ing up. What a coward. Good thing he got those defferments. God has humbled him. Now he has become a great joke.
February 15th, 2006 at 7:40 pmderek,what a quaint inference to take away; completely wrong,of course,but I’m sure you’re used to that.
February 15th, 2006 at 7:56 pmThe big sissy going to fox news instead of just having a press conference, if there was nothing to hide why go to Brit Hume big sissy man himself at fox news I am surprised he did not have his wife come out and speak for him, its about time they brought out the wives,
February 15th, 2006 at 8:10 pmthey always do when they get in big trouble,get ready for Laura and Cheneys wife again, acting like they have one brain between them LOL
who cares what they say it is all lies any way,that gang would not know the truth.
After watching the Fox News interview this afternoon and doin’ some more reading on the subject (like about how he fixed himself a cocktail back at the ranch in the evening,) it looks more and more like his flask was tipped more than once, but it more likely contained Wild Turkey…after all, y’all, this was a bird shoot.
February 15th, 2006 at 8:18 pmTwo points: one, when I was in high school (drinking age 18 then) and I went to a party, when I got home my parents would ask if I had anything to drink, I’d say “a beer”. Just truthful enough to be believed, yet innocuous enough to pass muster.
two, can we PLEASE get off this story and focus on Scooter Libby’s revelation that the VP authorized him to leak classified information?
I’m not suggesting that Cheney shot his buddy in the face in order to distract from the real story, the one that could damage him and the administration. But it sure is working out good for them, isn’t it?
February 15th, 2006 at 8:58 pmthe vice president fixed himself a cocktail back at the house.â€
Wow, this means he knew he wouldn’t face any police investigation that evening. Would any of us put any alcohol into our systems after such an accident if we thought the cops might be coming? How did he know FOR SURE that he wouldn’t face any questioning or testing?
February 15th, 2006 at 9:22 pmYou are the Captain of my heart.
February 15th, 2006 at 9:25 pmIronically, the Corpus Christi Times, the paper given the ’scoop’ on the Cheney shooting reported on 1/1/200 that the Texas blood/alcohol content to determine DUI was lowered from .1 to .08 here: http://web.caller.com/2000/january/01/today/local_ne/4482.html
February 15th, 2006 at 9:32 pmIt isn’t necessary that Cheney was ‘drunk’ for this to be an embarassment which he sought to avoid (after all, he was confident enough to ‘make himself a cocktail’ after the incident), only that he was over .08. This is probably what he was doing. His doctor on the scene may have even had breathalyzer equipment with him.
FLASH: WAS TEDDY DRUNK? IN WAKE OF CHENEY ACCIDENT LIBERAL PUNDIT WANTS TO KNOW.
Liberal pundit Larry O’Donnell went on Hugh Hewitt’s radio show today to talk about Dick Cheney’s hunting accident. Trouble is, O’Donnell kept changing the subject to Teddy Kennedy’s accident at Chappaquiddick, over 35 years ago:
I ask you and your audience, Hugh, please tell me why did Ted Kennedy avoid the police after his accident on Chappaquiddick? Do you think alcohol and inebriation had something to do with it?
So it won’t be a total loss, maybe Cheney’s accident will lead to two positive results: (1) greater gun safety awareness; and (2) the revival of legitimate questions about Chappaquiddick. As long as poor Mr. Whittington recovers (unlike Mary Jo Kopechne, he has that option), that wouldn’t be such a terrible trade-off.
February 15th, 2006 at 9:38 pmBlue State Red
That’s the silliest partisan thing I’ve read all week. You are clearly stating that you believe that Kennedy should be tried more than once for the same crime, whereas Cheney is innocent because you say he is? I know the partisan brain disables all regions of the brain around rational and reasoned thought – but I didn’t realize that it made you so funny! Now what you wrote was quite a satire, even if that’s not how you meant it pumpkin. I forgive you for your blindness and double standards – it can’t be helped pumpkin. Partisan brain makes people say silly things you know.
February 15th, 2006 at 9:48 pmYeah, people are obssessing about this, but for good reason. It’s a real look into the way in which this overly secretive administration operates.
The VP accidentally shoots someone; a media blackout ensues, a local police investigation is stalled for nearly a full day and then the whole sordid mess is spun to the press. After 2 or 3 days of non-comment the press secretary starts to suggest that “everyone should get over it, it’s old news, already covered…” etc., etc.
Nevermind that all of this is at odds with standard police practices, that certain details of the story (including the timing of the shooting & when it was first reported, the seriousness of the accident, whether alcohol was consumed…) have emerged that contradict earlier accounts and that serious questions have yet to be answered. Nevermind that if this had been anyone other than someone high up in the administration they’d likely be facing a court date for recklessness, failure to provide a breath sample, etc. We’re all supposed to move along and not ask questions.
Face it; this administration never has and never will care about “the rule of law”. As much as they bleat on about how people and nations have to respect the rule of law it just doesn’t apply to them. To them the rule of law is only a billy club they use to beat the crap out of and silence whomever they want.
February 15th, 2006 at 9:48 pmWe’re all preaching to choir here. Give me the address of a conservative blog to troll. I’m feeling feisty.
February 15th, 2006 at 10:01 pmThe silence is deafening.
February 15th, 2006 at 10:06 pmThere are such things, right?
You can always visit free republic,but you won’t get to post more than a couple messages, I lasted 3. They don’t want to hear from you and unlike here,they will revoke your ability to post.
February 15th, 2006 at 10:19 pmSolitaire,
I’ve had some fun at Ace of Spades, ace.mu.nu. Only trouble is that there are lots of kids who only have one response when confronted with reality: ad hominem attack. Gets kinda old.
February 15th, 2006 at 10:43 pmsince TP is busy blocking my message of Judiciary Committee websites to fight for further investigation of domestic spying, (see Will Congress…) and letting trolls run amok…I guess I have to post latest news:
Saddam Reportedly Warned U.S. of Terrorism
By GERALD NADLER (Associated Press Writer)
From Associated Press
February 15, 2006 10:17 PM EST
NEW YORK – Saddam Hussein told aides in the mid-1990s that he warned the United States it could be hit by a terrorist attack, ABC News reported Wednesday, citing 12 hours of tapes the network obtained of the former Iraqi dictator’s talks with his Cabinet.
One of Saddam’s son-in-laws also explained how Iraq hid its biological weapons programs from U.N. inspectors, according to the tapes from August 1995.
The coming terrorist attack Saddam predicted could involve weapons of mass destruction.
“Terrorism is coming. I told the Americans,” Saddam is heard saying, adding he “told the British as well.”
“In the future, what would prevent a booby trapped car causing a nuclear explosion in Washington or a germ or a chemical one?” Saddam said.
But he insisted Iraq would never launch such an attack. “This story is coming, but not from Iraq,” he said.
The State Department had no comment on the report, which aired on “World News Tonight.” ABC News said U.S. officials confirmed the tapes were authentic.
ABC News said the CIA found the tapes in Iraq and that the 12 hours were provided to it by Bill Tierney, a former member of a U.N. inspection team who was translating them for the FBI. ABC News quoted Tierney as saying the U.S. government was wrong to keep the tapes secret.
Deputy Prime Minister Tariq Aziz told Saddam on the tape that “the biological (attack) is very easy to make. It’s so simple that any biologist can make a bottle of germs and drop it into a water tower and kill 100,000.”
“This is not done by a state. No need to accuse a state. An individual can do it,” he said.
Hussein Kamel, a son-in-law of Saddam’s, who was then in charge of Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction efforts, explained how Iraq held back information from the U.N. inspectors.
“We did not reveal all that we have,” he said. “We did not reveal the volume of chemical weapons we had produced.”
Kamel said Iraq had not revealed “the type of weapons, not the volume of the materials we imported.”
Hussein Kamel defected to Jordan shortly after the tapes were recorded, and Iraq was forced to admit it had concealed its biological weapons program. Kamel returned to Iraq in February 1996 and was killed by security forces.
Charles Duelfer, who led the official U.S. search for weapons of mass destruction after the first Gulf War, told ABC News the tapes show extensive deception but don’t prove that weapons were still hidden in Iraq at the time of the U.S.-led war in 2003.
“What they do is support the conclusion in the report which we made in the last couple of years, that the regime had the intention of building and rebuilding weapons of mass destruction, when circumstances permitted,” he said.
Copyright 2005 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
February 15th, 2006 at 10:53 pmAnother reason why this story is important and worth attention: It’s the only thing the Right seems to be unable to argue about, and even seems to agree somewhat with the left.
The simple, unforseen, incidents/accidents, can be understood by all, are unarguable and can be the death of a political/professional career. I call it Karma.
February 15th, 2006 at 11:14 pmWhether impressing each other shooting pen birds or hitting each other in the head with golf shots … they are ultimately a bunch of phoney slime and no one should care about them consuming each other at all. Let them blast away … let them lie like hell … let them rob our nation … let them represent us as they deface any semblance of a people proud, true and interested in honor. When people have had enough the pendulum will swing wildly back the other way and it’ll be counter chaos all over. When the de-construction of the current political trend starts what will it be destroying? Greedy, selfish,lazy sluts? insatiable bloodsucking vampires? What did the Republican plan and promise to restore this nations dignity bring? Dishonor and shame? And by the way, Up Is Down. We didn’t “discover” this country with a “living together in peace” idea. We barged in with a murderous selfish evocation to “see to gettin’ mine and screw everyone and everything else. You reap what you sow.
February 15th, 2006 at 11:15 pm55, BSR
We all know Kennedy is a drunk, the Chappaquiddick thing is still mentioned, etc. The difference nowadays is: Kennedy has little effect on things, and is harmless. Cheney runs the show and is responsible for far more currently relevant crimes than moonshine Ted would ever be capable of.
February 15th, 2006 at 11:18 pmI did not watch the Cheney chat with Brit Hume, but from what bits I have read on the Internet blogs, it appears that Dick’s story is unraveling on what really happened!
He now admits drinking at least a beer, more likely several
that day, and then chugging mixed drink that evening or two?
Boy this is turning into a scandal bigtime!!!
February 16th, 2006 at 4:16 amOl’ Harry should have said “bottoms up” instead of “here’s lookin’ at ya” when him an’ Cheney tossed down their last shot of Ol’ Crow.
February 16th, 2006 at 6:50 amThis administration seems to think it is papal. They believe they are infallible. From denying the Congress access to communications and testifyers they need to perform their oversight duties to cherry picking what they will release to the Congress and by extension to the people. They seem to forget that we pay their salaries and have every right to know what is being done behind closed doors. Like selecting data that said “We know Iraq has wmds” when they knew nothing of the kind, denigrating the efforts of the IAEA, to deciding who and w3hat and when data could be declassified.
February 16th, 2006 at 7:55 amCheney is a dope…
He just keeps f-ing up. What a coward. Good thing he got those defferments. God has humbled him. Now he has become a great joke.
Comment by Heynow #46
…The curse is working…
February 16th, 2006 at 8:53 amJust because someone says that Whittington and Armstrong weren’t drinking doesn’t mean the shooter wasn’t drinking.
And the sheriff obviously didn’t do his job. Duh!
But, because he was a little weasle who was easily intimidated, we will never know, and there you are.
Comment by Solitaire #27
The “never knowing” part was indeed the objective on Cheney’s part…
…with these guys they NEVER want you to know…
February 16th, 2006 at 8:56 amWould this administration willfully influence NBC?
February 16th, 2006 at 9:48 amIs NBC owned by G.E.?
Is G.E. one of our main war materials manufacturer?
Is this war good for business at G.E.?
Did NBC fire Phil Donahue because he had some anti-war critics on his show?
Would Dick Cheney be above telling NBC — “either go easy on this story or you’ll lose some defense contracts”?
Do women normally go shooting with the vicepresident?
February 16th, 2006 at 10:21 amDid she(Pam Willeford) have a valid license to hunt: with the correct stamp?
How many quail did she bag?Did she have a drink too?
Was the man who was shot drinking?
Do Texas hunting dogs not retrieve?
Was the vicepresident on heart medication while he was drinking?
Does he drive while on this medication? Is he allowed to shoot while on this medication?
So many questions, so few answers.
do as I say not as I do, that is if I tell you I did it…
February 16th, 2006 at 11:13 amSeems to me we are seeing quite a display of Republican hubris everytime we turn around and its getting ridiculous.
In the Cheney example its drinking and firearms, wheteher or not he had a current hunting permit, and of course wheteher or not the People ought to know?
In the Delay matter its not whether or not the guys a crook but rather filling an seat on, of all things the appropriations commitee with him!?
Chertikoff jumps up saying we were informed, and yet the Katrina excercise in emergency preparedness and response was an abject total and complete failure! I ask any who read this, if a hurricane is forming at sea and a coastal region isnt attended to quickly and efficiently what then if there were ever a nationwide calamity of near biblical dimension . say aoh I dont know? Tsunami? or even the flu, or common cold?
Even Ahhhnuld, who didnt have a motorcycle endorsement for his drivers license when he had an accident and a minor was injured,wasnt held to the standard that the People are held to had a n average citizen not had such an endorsement,and why?
Because he’s a movie star, multi millionaire, or Governor?
Do we seriuosly wonder why in the rap music genre there is such seething contempt for authority when we see examples of power hungry party wreaking preferential and destructive corrosive tendencies upon a People the likes of which in modern times has never been seen before?
I ask you then dear readers, at what time revolution?
U.S. Rejects U.N. Report on Gitmo
February 16th, 2006 at 12:52 pmYOU AMERICANS ARE THE ARSE HOLE OF THE WORLD
YOU AMERICANS ARE THE ARSE HOLE OF THE WORLD
Comment by Tommy #74
Naw Tommy,
…just the right wing conservative, murderous, racist, treasonous, animalfu*king, Bushba*licking, dumb a*s, inbreds…
NOTE: when they find the courage to post their signatures on these fora are…
I-Right-I, Blue State inb’Red, Tracy, Mighty Aphrodite, Gary Ruppert, Giacomo, and Mike (the Miscreant), to name a few…
The rest of us are REALLY pretty cool,
…once you get to know us…
February 16th, 2006 at 1:09 pmIn what way is the story complicated- as VP said in his interview with Hume yesterday. Good old boys/rednecks go bird hunting everyday, so I doubt there is anything complicated about this story.
February 16th, 2006 at 3:54 pmI took a screen shot of the MSNBC web page last night. I figured that they would change what they published. So I have the proof of what they put on the web from yesterday.
February 16th, 2006 at 10:29 pmKatherine Armstrong also said in a televised interview that Dick Cheney had a cocktail after he blasted the unfortunate fellow. I’d say it is clear this is a cover up. Cheney went back to the house and started drinking while they scooted the bloody mess out of his presence. That way, if the police were to arrive, he could say that he started drinking after the incident because he was so upset. After all, he did say it was the worst day of his life. NOT, that day that 11 marines died because of his lies. That was just a ho-hum day.
February 16th, 2006 at 10:38 pmBad Boys, Bad Boys, whatcha gonna do when they come for you? Lie, that’s what. Only ONE beer, sir. Sure….and Dick isn’t really the guy in charge. George bumbles and stumbles again and lets Vice run the show.
February 17th, 2006 at 12:18 pmDo any of the medications that Cheney takes carry a warning about the consumption of alcohol?
February 17th, 2006 at 1:14 pmAmerica is awakening!!!!
http://www.hermes-press.com/life_awakening.htm
February 18th, 2006 at 7:12 am