Are you off your meds? How many times do I have to tell you that I agree with this?

You are a rude and stupid person who would rather call people “racists” on an internet forum than show somebody how the proposed law is racist.

Comment by David Griggs — February 25, 2006 @ 10:40 pm

All though my I.Q. qualifies me for Mensa, it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to see that your comment was racist. Tough if you don’t like it, but YOU made the comment, and the dictionary doesn’t lie.

Maybe thinking before you speak is in order?

I don’t think the law is racist. But you most definitely are.

The rule is NOT based on skin color as EVERYONE needs to have a photo ID and not just black.

BLACKS are causing a ruckus, not whites, therefore I amadressing the BLACK problem in my comments about this stupid article. I don’t see how requiring ALL people to have a photo ID is racist and NONE of your ignorant and predictible name calling has shown me the answer.

You are a rude and stupid person who would rather call people “racists” on an internet forum than show somebody how the proposed law is racist.

Comment by David Griggs — February 24, 2006 @ 3:20 pm

You said:

Fucking black people would rather bitch and moan than do things the right way.

Comment by David Griggs — February 24, 2006 @ 11:43 am

The definition of racism is:

rac·ism
n.

The belief that race accounts for differences in human character or ability and that a particular race is superior to others.

Discrimination or prejudice based on race.

Yep, you qualify.

And if nit-picking my typographical errors is the best you can do – you’re a pathetic debater as well. Grow a brain. The problem isn’t black skin but elected representatives who tell you that it’s the black voter you should hate, while they are robbing us blind. You’re blaming the wrong people, and our country is falling apart. It would be laughable if it weren’t so tragic.

Let me try and give you another example since you seem so ignorant.

I for one enjoy people to be clean around me. I do not like smelling body odor or bad breath, etc. If I wanted to pass a law thatsaid people needed to shower once a dayand brush their teeth, you would have black people saying it was racist because poor black people don’t have running water. that’s stupid because one thing has nothing to do with the other.

I don’t like homeless bums, panhandlers, or muggers either but that doesn’t mean I don’t like black people just because those sub-species of criminal are predominantly black.

Only immature, self loathing morons conclude that everyone who disagrees with them is a racist. It’s the easy way out.

Comment by unbelievable

Did you ever date a black guy?

Comment by David Griggs — February 24, 2006 @ 2:23 pm

You said:

Fucking black people would rather bitch and moan than do things the right way.

Comment by David Griggs — February 24, 2006 @ 11:43 am

I was pointing out that you’re a racist who was bitching about people bitching. That’s not bitching. It’s calling you out on your hate mongering and hypocracy.

I happen to agree on the issue of requiring i.d.s to vote, which I said so above.

And, before you accuse me again, I’m not a Democrat. I detest both political parties. As well as anyone who stereo-types and then whines like a four year old about them.

It seems that black people translate “You must have a photo ID” into “White people hate black people.” I don’t know how or why but that is stupid. It’s not like they are saying ONLY black people have to use photo ID and white people don’t have to. Come on. Stop bitching.

Comment by David Griggs — February 24, 2006 @ 1:23 pm

I live in Georgia. There was a news reporter who did an expose in which she was able to vote at several precincts throughout the day. When she went to vote for real at her own, she had been tagged and not allowed to vote. That was several years ago. It was just appalling then as it is now. But to blame the black population for this is just flat out ignorant. Nothing gets solved that way, and frequently, it’s how wars get waged.

Now in Georgia you can just show up and vote – no ID is required. Duh! That’s pretty dumb way to be “fair and accurate” wouldn’t you say you whiny democrat?

Comment by David Griggs — February 24, 2006 @ 11:43 am

You’ve met every one to be able to stereotype them all like that? If not, your argument isn’t valid.

Second of all, you’re bitching and moaning rather than doing things the ‘right way’ (whatever nonsense that means). Doesn’t this make you mad at yourself?

Racist Moron.

answers please, from racists and non-racists alike.

Comment by kingfelix

You’re rather quick to throw down the racist card aren’t you? But let’s face it, there are some people in this country too f’ing stupid to be allowed to vote. Why should some crack whore with fifteen bastard children be allowed to vote herself more welfare funds? Why should her vote cancel out mine? Is that racist or is that eminently practical? As an Englishman you should have more sense.

Comment by peachkfc

How could there be a legitimate reason for it if it is a racist and discriminatory voter disenfranchisement scheme?

Your mind is made up. Because it’s the South of course it’s racist. So what? Under my plan the welfare queens and others living off the tit of my tax dollars aren’t going to get to vote anyway. That takes care of the racial problem because everybody knows(and are quick to point out) that there are more white folk on the dole than black folk. See how easy that is to become racially inclusive at the stroke of a pen? Damn I’m good.

Antagonist, I’m perfectly willing to believe that there may be some other possibly legitimate explanation for this apparently racist and discriminatory voter disenfranchisement scheme. However, neither you nor anybody else has come forward with one. At this point, I’m not making a judgment on whether Georgia is intentionally trying to disenfranchise large numbers of poor, black, presumably Democratic voters, although based on some of the statements made by Georgia officials, it certainly seems that way. Be that as it may, however, under Federal Civil Rights law, (and I’m greatly simplifying and paraphrasing here, so don’t jump down my throat if this is not perfectly phrased) if the program has an apparently discriminatory effect, even if it is arguably unintentional, the burden is on the State of Georgia to show that either there really isn’t any discriminatory effect or that the apparently discriminatory effect is the innocent or inadvertent result of some neccessary part of the way the prgram is set up. That may still not be enough to get them off the hook, but I haven’t heard anybody make even a stab at trying to explain that, one, the program does not, in fact, result in discrimination or that, two, any possible discrimination is the unintentional effect of some necessary aaspect of the program. In fact, I still haven’t heard any explanation at all from Georgia except that this is the way is, so shut up and get over it (or words to that effect.) Your sole argument seems to be that those who oppose this program as it has been set up only think it’s racist because it was set up by Republicans, so therefore our complaints must be dismissed out of hand. That is an empty and useless argument that doesn’t advance your position in any way at all. You’ve got to do better than that.

I AM A MAN

I AM A MAN

I AM A MAN!!!