<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The UAE Secrecy Myth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/01/the-uae-secrecy-myth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/01/the-uae-secrecy-myth/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 05:20:24 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Clif</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/01/the-uae-secrecy-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-462991</link>
		<dc:creator>Clif</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 09:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/01/the-uae-secrecy-myth/#comment-462991</guid>
		<description>Jay if they can&#039;t run a covert operation in washington, how can they ever expect us to believe they stand a chance in the big wide world......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jay if they can&#8217;t run a covert operation in washington, how can they ever expect us to believe they stand a chance in the big wide world&#8230;&#8230;<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=462991', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Randal</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/01/the-uae-secrecy-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-462858</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Randal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 04:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/01/the-uae-secrecy-myth/#comment-462858</guid>
		<description>The Bush Regime never intended for the UAE takeover of our East Coast ports to ever be revealed, or at least NOT until after &quot;Dubai Ports World&quot; was already running the ports! Somebody leaked the pending deal to the press before it was put into operation, so that caused Bush to make up a story of his not knowing about it &gt; lol. The deal was supposed to be a SECRET!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Bush Regime never intended for the UAE takeover of our East Coast ports to ever be revealed, or at least NOT until after &#8220;Dubai Ports World&#8221; was already running the ports! Somebody leaked the pending deal to the press before it was put into operation, so that caused Bush to make up a story of his not knowing about it &gt; lol. The deal was supposed to be a SECRET!<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=462858', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Oracle</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/01/the-uae-secrecy-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-462778</link>
		<dc:creator>The Oracle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 03:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/01/the-uae-secrecy-myth/#comment-462778</guid>
		<description>The deliberations are being kept under wraps because the Bush administration doesn&#039;t want anyone in Congress or us to find out what is really behind the UAE port deal.

Well, we already know what a plum deal this will be for the UAE, and any al Qaeda terrorists lurking in the shadows who will try to exploit it, but what does the United States get out of the deal???

You know that Bush wouldn&#039;t be so adamant about this deal unless something very important was at stake, something that the Bush administration desperately wants from the UAE.

And the only thing I see that makes the UAE so important is the UAE&#039;s strategic location beside the Strait of Hormuz, through which much of the world&#039;s oil passes.

So, if I were a responsible, intelligent member of Congress, I&#039;d immediately subpoenae the U.S. General in charge of U.S. forces over in the United Arab Emirates to compel him to appear before Congress...and get some answers.

Are any unusual war preparations underway in the UAE under the orders of Donald Rumsfeld? (And when I mean unusual, I mean beyond what U.S. forces are currently doing in the UAE regarding air support for our forces on the ground in Iraq and Afghanistan).

Is there a timetable in place, from Rumsfeld, to launch an attack across the Strait of Hormuz, to establish a beachhead on the Iranian side of the strait? (In other words, have amphibious assault landing craft been deployed to the UAE. And have training exercises been conducted in northern UAE, which has perfect flat terrain beside the Persian Gulf, and is close to the Strait of Hormuz, across from Iran?)

Maybe my suspicions are groundless.

But I say, call the generals in charge over there home and have them testify under oath before Congress...before it is too late to stop the madmen in the White House. Because war with Iran will make Bush&#039;s Iraq War and Bush&#039;s Hurricane Katrina disaster look like childs play.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The deliberations are being kept under wraps because the Bush administration doesn&#8217;t want anyone in Congress or us to find out what is really behind the UAE port deal.</p>
<p>Well, we already know what a plum deal this will be for the UAE, and any al Qaeda terrorists lurking in the shadows who will try to exploit it, but what does the United States get out of the deal???</p>
<p>You know that Bush wouldn&#8217;t be so adamant about this deal unless something very important was at stake, something that the Bush administration desperately wants from the UAE.</p>
<p>And the only thing I see that makes the UAE so important is the UAE&#8217;s strategic location beside the Strait of Hormuz, through which much of the world&#8217;s oil passes.</p>
<p>So, if I were a responsible, intelligent member of Congress, I&#8217;d immediately subpoenae the U.S. General in charge of U.S. forces over in the United Arab Emirates to compel him to appear before Congress&#8230;and get some answers.</p>
<p>Are any unusual war preparations underway in the UAE under the orders of Donald Rumsfeld? (And when I mean unusual, I mean beyond what U.S. forces are currently doing in the UAE regarding air support for our forces on the ground in Iraq and Afghanistan).</p>
<p>Is there a timetable in place, from Rumsfeld, to launch an attack across the Strait of Hormuz, to establish a beachhead on the Iranian side of the strait? (In other words, have amphibious assault landing craft been deployed to the UAE. And have training exercises been conducted in northern UAE, which has perfect flat terrain beside the Persian Gulf, and is close to the Strait of Hormuz, across from Iran?)</p>
<p>Maybe my suspicions are groundless.</p>
<p>But I say, call the generals in charge over there home and have them testify under oath before Congress&#8230;before it is too late to stop the madmen in the White House. Because war with Iran will make Bush&#8217;s Iraq War and Bush&#8217;s Hurricane Katrina disaster look like childs play.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=462778', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marty Didier</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/01/the-uae-secrecy-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-462725</link>
		<dc:creator>Marty Didier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 01:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/01/the-uae-secrecy-myth/#comment-462725</guid>
		<description>Of course the Corruption Element within our Federal Government will want to keep everything about this sale QUIET.  

I was in a family for more than 26 years who joined Organized Crime, however this wasn&#039;t any ordinary Crime System.  They considered it the World&#039;s Largest Crime System.

Within the Criminal System, Mandarin is considered a major Corruption Laundromat.  
Mandarin Oriental Group
http://www.mandarinoriental.com/hotel/520000016.asp

The Tribune wrote an article not long ago that almost immediately after being placed on the internet in the news area, was BLOCKED.  Check it out for yourself!
Just who is building Mandarin?
http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/chi-0510020321oct02,1,4790705.story?coll=chi-news-hed

But the real concern you need to have is that the owner of Dubai is the same owner of Mandarin.  Check this out!
Look Who&#039;s Talking
http://www.modernagent.com/x/modernagent/visitor/resources/editorial.cds?n=6039

Frankly, back in the early 1990&#039;s when I was told in great detail about this by the family, it was considered to be a mammoth sized Laundromat for the Federal area.  But with more than 10 years later, I&#039;m certain many other areas have joined in as well.  The reader would be wise to investigate who are the INVESTORS in Mandarin Group and you better have your seat belt fastened first!

There are other Laundromats but Mandarin is by far the Worlds Largest!  I&#039;m surprised the news hasn&#039;t checked into where the money goes?  In order to steal money a theif has to first clean it before they can use it.  Small time operators use single operators to wash their money,  but major sized operations require huge Corporations to wash their money.  Mandarin is by far the biggest.

If you don&#039;t believe me, check it out for yourself!  I can also tell you of a few others too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course the Corruption Element within our Federal Government will want to keep everything about this sale QUIET.  </p>
<p>I was in a family for more than 26 years who joined Organized Crime, however this wasn&#8217;t any ordinary Crime System.  They considered it the World&#8217;s Largest Crime System.</p>
<p>Within the Criminal System, Mandarin is considered a major Corruption Laundromat.<br />
Mandarin Oriental Group<br />
<a href="http://www.mandarinoriental.com/hotel/520000016.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.mandarinoriental.com/hotel/520000016.asp</a></p>
<p>The Tribune wrote an article not long ago that almost immediately after being placed on the internet in the news area, was BLOCKED.  Check it out for yourself!<br />
Just who is building Mandarin?<br />
<a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/chi-0510020321oct02,1,4790705.story?coll=chi-news-hed" rel="nofollow">http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/chi-0510020321oct02,1,4790705.story?coll=chi-news-hed</a></p>
<p>But the real concern you need to have is that the owner of Dubai is the same owner of Mandarin.  Check this out!<br />
Look Who&#8217;s Talking<br />
<a href="http://www.modernagent.com/x/modernagent/visitor/resources/editorial.cds?n=6039" rel="nofollow">http://www.modernagent.com/x/modernagent/visitor/resources/editorial.cds?n=6039</a></p>
<p>Frankly, back in the early 1990&#8217;s when I was told in great detail about this by the family, it was considered to be a mammoth sized Laundromat for the Federal area.  But with more than 10 years later, I&#8217;m certain many other areas have joined in as well.  The reader would be wise to investigate who are the INVESTORS in Mandarin Group and you better have your seat belt fastened first!</p>
<p>There are other Laundromats but Mandarin is by far the Worlds Largest!  I&#8217;m surprised the news hasn&#8217;t checked into where the money goes?  In order to steal money a theif has to first clean it before they can use it.  Small time operators use single operators to wash their money,  but major sized operations require huge Corporations to wash their money.  Mandarin is by far the biggest.</p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t believe me, check it out for yourself!  I can also tell you of a few others too.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=462725', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zionista</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/01/the-uae-secrecy-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-462660</link>
		<dc:creator>Zionista</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 00:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/01/the-uae-secrecy-myth/#comment-462660</guid>
		<description>Who are the ones who keep telling us that if you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to worry about, anyway?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who are the ones who keep telling us that if you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to worry about, anyway?<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=462660', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: big papa</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/01/the-uae-secrecy-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-462543</link>
		<dc:creator>big papa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 23:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/01/the-uae-secrecy-myth/#comment-462543</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s absolutely &lt;strong&gt;FABULOUS to see Bushiva &lt;/strong&gt;so &lt;strong&gt;desperate&lt;/strong&gt; to get his hands on that &lt;strong&gt;50 pieces of silver&lt;/strong&gt;...

...look at his rodent-like eyes as he pounds home the point that &lt;strong&gt;UAE &lt;/strong&gt;is our &lt;strong&gt;stauchest ally &lt;/strong&gt;in their &lt;strong&gt;trumped up &quot;war on terror&quot;...&lt;/strong&gt;

...the &lt;strong&gt;TREASONOUS bast*rd&lt;/strong&gt; looks like he&#039;s going to &lt;strong&gt;go ballistic &lt;/strong&gt;if he &lt;strong&gt;doesn&#039;t get his way...&lt;/strong&gt;

...that sombich is a &lt;strong&gt;TRAITOR&lt;/strong&gt; if ever there was one...

...has anybody seen that other &lt;strong&gt;TREASONOUS a*shole L&#039;il Dick &lt;/strong&gt;lately?

...guess they&#039;re &lt;strong&gt;hiding him &lt;/strong&gt;at the undisclosed location &#039;til that &lt;strong&gt;18% approval rating &lt;/strong&gt;inches up to at least 20...

...maybe he&#039;s &lt;strong&gt;ducking &quot;the ides of March&quot;&lt;/strong&gt;...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s absolutely <strong>FABULOUS to see Bushiva </strong>so <strong>desperate</strong> to get his hands on that <strong>50 pieces of silver</strong>&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;look at his rodent-like eyes as he pounds home the point that <strong>UAE </strong>is our <strong>stauchest ally </strong>in their <strong>trumped up &#8220;war on terror&#8221;&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>&#8230;the <strong>TREASONOUS bast*rd</strong> looks like he&#8217;s going to <strong>go ballistic </strong>if he <strong>doesn&#8217;t get his way&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>&#8230;that sombich is a <strong>TRAITOR</strong> if ever there was one&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;has anybody seen that other <strong>TREASONOUS a*shole L&#8217;il Dick </strong>lately?</p>
<p>&#8230;guess they&#8217;re <strong>hiding him </strong>at the undisclosed location &#8217;til that <strong>18% approval rating </strong>inches up to at least 20&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;maybe he&#8217;s <strong>ducking &#8220;the ides of March&#8221;</strong>&#8230;<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=462543', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne A. Schneider</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/01/the-uae-secrecy-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-462488</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne A. Schneider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 22:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/01/the-uae-secrecy-myth/#comment-462488</guid>
		<description>I still wonder what longtime friend to the Bush family (and many wealthy Arabs) James Bath has to do with this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still wonder what longtime friend to the Bush family (and many wealthy Arabs) James Bath has to do with this.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=462488', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Current Era Blog &#187; The UAE Secrecy Myth</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/01/the-uae-secrecy-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-462487</link>
		<dc:creator>Current Era Blog &#187; The UAE Secrecy Myth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 22:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/01/the-uae-secrecy-myth/#comment-462487</guid>
		<description>[...] from Judd Legum ThinkProgress.org The Bush administration claims it can&#8217;t reveal any details about the evaluation of the UAE port deal because the law requires all deliberations to be confidential. The co-author of the law has spoken up and says that&#8217;s not true. President Bush claims the review showed their were no security implications. He should make the deliberations and evaluations public and prove it. â€“ Judd [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] from Judd Legum ThinkProgress.org The Bush administration claims it can&#8217;t reveal any details about the evaluation of the UAE port deal because the law requires all deliberations to be confidential. The co-author of the law has spoken up and says that&#8217;s not true. President Bush claims the review showed their were no security implications. He should make the deliberations and evaluations public and prove it. â€“ Judd [...]<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=462487', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eastender</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/01/the-uae-secrecy-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-462484</link>
		<dc:creator>Eastender</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 22:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/01/the-uae-secrecy-myth/#comment-462484</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been lurking for a while, but just had to join this discussion, so I&#039;m new here.

The reasonable objection to the DPW deal is security, plain and simple. &quot;Racism&quot; is just a red herring to deflect attention from the administration&#039;s obsession with secrecy and their attitude that Bush and his handlers know best. And, oh yeah, it&#039;s a BAD IDEA.

The AP ran a story today &quot;Lawmakers Vow Not to Force Quick Port Vote&quot; Towards the end of the story is a very interesting statement by DPW&#039;s Ed Bilky:

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;em&gt;Bush administration officials and the company&#039;s chief operating officer, Edward H. Bilkey, sought to reassure lawmakers the deal was prudent.

Before the Senate Commerce Committee, Bilkey said DP World spends large amounts on security already and recognizes that its business would be significantly disrupted if any problems were traced to the company.

&quot;We couldn&#039;t afford for anything to go wrong,&quot; Bilkey told senators.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Well maybe DPW can&#039;t afford for anything to go wrong, but  al Qaeda would love to do anything that would significantly disrupt business at major East Coast ports.

We currently inspect about 5% of containers arriving at our ports. Giving a country that is a known conduit for al Qaeda finances the control of our ports is like putting the monkeys in charge of the bananna boat. Only worse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been lurking for a while, but just had to join this discussion, so I&#8217;m new here.</p>
<p>The reasonable objection to the DPW deal is security, plain and simple. &#8220;Racism&#8221; is just a red herring to deflect attention from the administration&#8217;s obsession with secrecy and their attitude that Bush and his handlers know best. And, oh yeah, it&#8217;s a BAD IDEA.</p>
<p>The AP ran a story today &#8220;Lawmakers Vow Not to Force Quick Port Vote&#8221; Towards the end of the story is a very interesting statement by DPW&#8217;s Ed Bilky:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Bush administration officials and the company&#8217;s chief operating officer, Edward H. Bilkey, sought to reassure lawmakers the deal was prudent.</p>
<p>Before the Senate Commerce Committee, Bilkey said DP World spends large amounts on security already and recognizes that its business would be significantly disrupted if any problems were traced to the company.</p>
<p>&#8220;We couldn&#8217;t afford for anything to go wrong,&#8221; Bilkey told senators.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Well maybe DPW can&#8217;t afford for anything to go wrong, but  al Qaeda would love to do anything that would significantly disrupt business at major East Coast ports.</p>
<p>We currently inspect about 5% of containers arriving at our ports. Giving a country that is a known conduit for al Qaeda finances the control of our ports is like putting the monkeys in charge of the bananna boat. Only worse.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=462484', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Honest Response</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/01/the-uae-secrecy-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-462421</link>
		<dc:creator>Honest Response</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 22:11:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/01/the-uae-secrecy-myth/#comment-462421</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;DPW was DPI before it became DPW, and DPI was in charge of the port in Aden where the USS Cole was bombed:&lt;/strong&gt;

http://www.worldpress.o rg/Mideast/ 2162.cfm

http:// www.itp.net/ business/news/ details.php? id=19332&amp; category=arabian business

&quot;Dubai Ports World (DPW), owned by the emirate&#039;s government, fired the first shot when it made a bid of US$5.91 billion in November 2005. However, Singaporeâ€™s PSA has hit back, approaching P&amp;O with a conditional counter offer of US$6.21 billion. A formal offer could be submitted within the next few days.

PSAâ€™s conditions were that it be allowed to complete satisfactory due diligence, that its board give final approval, that P&amp;Oâ€™s directors withdraw their recommendation of the DPW offer, and that P&amp;Oâ€™s pension trustees approve the offer.

PSA has operations in 11 countries and is the worldâ€™s second-largest ports group. &lt;strong&gt;By contrast, DPW was formed as recently as September with the amalgamation of the Dubai Ports Authority and DPI Terminals.&lt;/strong&gt; &quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>DPW was DPI before it became DPW, and DPI was in charge of the port in Aden where the USS Cole was bombed:</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.worldpress.o" rel="nofollow">http://www.worldpress.o</a> rg/Mideast/ 2162.cfm</p>
<p>http:// <a href="http://www.itp.net/" rel="nofollow">http://www.itp.net/</a> business/news/ details.php? id=19332&amp; category=arabian business</p>
<p>&#8220;Dubai Ports World (DPW), owned by the emirate&#8217;s government, fired the first shot when it made a bid of US$5.91 billion in November 2005. However, Singaporeâ€™s PSA has hit back, approaching P&amp;O with a conditional counter offer of US$6.21 billion. A formal offer could be submitted within the next few days.</p>
<p>PSAâ€™s conditions were that it be allowed to complete satisfactory due diligence, that its board give final approval, that P&amp;Oâ€™s directors withdraw their recommendation of the DPW offer, and that P&amp;Oâ€™s pension trustees approve the offer.</p>
<p>PSA has operations in 11 countries and is the worldâ€™s second-largest ports group. <strong>By contrast, DPW was formed as recently as September with the amalgamation of the Dubai Ports Authority and DPI Terminals.</strong> &#8220;<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=462421', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spudge_Boy</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/01/the-uae-secrecy-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-462355</link>
		<dc:creator>Spudge_Boy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 21:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/01/the-uae-secrecy-myth/#comment-462355</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The UAE deal is a routine occurrence, with a standard protocol, 45 day review etc.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

There was NOT a 45 day review. That is what DPW has agreed to now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The UAE deal is a routine occurrence, with a standard protocol, 45 day review etc.</p></blockquote>
<p>There was NOT a 45 day review. That is what DPW has agreed to now.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=462355', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mr ho</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/01/the-uae-secrecy-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-462298</link>
		<dc:creator>mr ho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 21:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/01/the-uae-secrecy-myth/#comment-462298</guid>
		<description>Bush friend Evans explanation might offer some insite


&#039;Economic Security is National Security&#039;

aka War for Oil</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bush friend Evans explanation might offer some insite</p>
<p>&#8216;Economic Security is National Security&#8217;</p>
<p>aka War for Oil<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=462298', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul in LA</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/01/the-uae-secrecy-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-462285</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul in LA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 20:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/01/the-uae-secrecy-myth/#comment-462285</guid>
		<description>&quot;I tend to agree with Kevin Drum over at the Washington Monthly that the Dubai port deal is not necessarily the grave and gathering security risk its opponents decry.&quot;

Hilarious. &lt;b&gt;When Dubai PW takes over the terminals, they and their employees will learn intimate details of our port security.&lt;/b&gt;

Kevin Drum wants to add this to his list of laydowns, that&#039;s his right. 

THIS IS A DEAL FOR CARLYLE. It is rotten through the core.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I tend to agree with Kevin Drum over at the Washington Monthly that the Dubai port deal is not necessarily the grave and gathering security risk its opponents decry.&#8221;</p>
<p>Hilarious. <b>When Dubai PW takes over the terminals, they and their employees will learn intimate details of our port security.</b></p>
<p>Kevin Drum wants to add this to his list of laydowns, that&#8217;s his right. </p>
<p>THIS IS A DEAL FOR CARLYLE. It is rotten through the core.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=462285', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LC Liberal</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/01/the-uae-secrecy-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-462282</link>
		<dc:creator>LC Liberal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 20:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/01/the-uae-secrecy-myth/#comment-462282</guid>
		<description>The UAE deal is a routine occurrence, with a standard protocol, 45 day review etc. The Bush administration just went completely berserk over this with their secrecy. Kind of like the Cheney shooting fiasco. 

www.sunstateactivist.org/
A comprehensive database of progressive news, views, and events.

www.lcoliberal.blogspot.com
Progressive commentary on the issues that really matter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The UAE deal is a routine occurrence, with a standard protocol, 45 day review etc. The Bush administration just went completely berserk over this with their secrecy. Kind of like the Cheney shooting fiasco. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.sunstateactivist.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.sunstateactivist.org/</a><br />
A comprehensive database of progressive news, views, and events.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.lcoliberal.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.lcoliberal.blogspot.com</a><br />
Progressive commentary on the issues that really matter<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=462282', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/01/the-uae-secrecy-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-462276</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 20:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/01/the-uae-secrecy-myth/#comment-462276</guid>
		<description>&quot;all over the place&quot;  oops</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;all over the place&#8221;  oops<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=462276', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/01/the-uae-secrecy-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-462275</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 20:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/01/the-uae-secrecy-myth/#comment-462275</guid>
		<description>Those Dubai businessmen have lots going on all of the place:

Feb.24,2005:

    &quot;Palestinians do not welcome the controversial offer of a Dubai-based property magnate to buy up all the properties that Israeli settlers vacate in Gaza later this year as it would amount to recognizing Israel. Asked about the proposal of Mohammad Ali Al Abbar, the Director-General of the Dubai Department of Economic Development and Chairman of Emaar Properties, an Israeli Arab lawmaker dubbed it as an attempt to transform Palestine into a huge real estate project.

    â€œPalestine is not a real estate project,â€ Knesset member Mohammed Barakeh said in Tuesday.

    Israelâ€™s second television channel reported that Abbar had offered $56 million for homes at the Gush Katif settlement bloc in the southern Gaza Strip.

    Abbarâ€™s secret visit to the Occupied Territories last week and his alleged meetings with senior Israeli leaders also angered many in the Arab region.
    The London-based Elaph web site quoted Israeli sources as saying that Abbar had met secretly with Prime Minister Ariel Sharon. He is also believed to have had talks with Israeli Deputy Prime Minister Shimon Peres after briefly meeting Sharon in the first publicly reported meeting between officials from the two countries, which have no diplomatic relations.

    Many people see the visit of Mr. Abbar and his proposal as out of step in such a political mix and without a peaceful solution to the Palestinian issue. Just what exactly the purchase of purchasing illegal built  settlements mean , is it to reward the government of Israel. What about establishing Emaar Palestine will achieve? Palestine is not Dubai, as a lot of corruption are spread and most properly that any financial or economic development will be wasted , just like the billion of Euro spent the EU which has gone into the pocket of Yasser Arafat and his aids of Ministers.&quot;

http://www.desert-voice.net/news_from_uae.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those Dubai businessmen have lots going on all of the place:</p>
<p>Feb.24,2005:</p>
<p>    &#8220;Palestinians do not welcome the controversial offer of a Dubai-based property magnate to buy up all the properties that Israeli settlers vacate in Gaza later this year as it would amount to recognizing Israel. Asked about the proposal of Mohammad Ali Al Abbar, the Director-General of the Dubai Department of Economic Development and Chairman of Emaar Properties, an Israeli Arab lawmaker dubbed it as an attempt to transform Palestine into a huge real estate project.</p>
<p>    â€œPalestine is not a real estate project,â€ Knesset member Mohammed Barakeh said in Tuesday.</p>
<p>    Israelâ€™s second television channel reported that Abbar had offered $56 million for homes at the Gush Katif settlement bloc in the southern Gaza Strip.</p>
<p>    Abbarâ€™s secret visit to the Occupied Territories last week and his alleged meetings with senior Israeli leaders also angered many in the Arab region.<br />
    The London-based Elaph web site quoted Israeli sources as saying that Abbar had met secretly with Prime Minister Ariel Sharon. He is also believed to have had talks with Israeli Deputy Prime Minister Shimon Peres after briefly meeting Sharon in the first publicly reported meeting between officials from the two countries, which have no diplomatic relations.</p>
<p>    Many people see the visit of Mr. Abbar and his proposal as out of step in such a political mix and without a peaceful solution to the Palestinian issue. Just what exactly the purchase of purchasing illegal built  settlements mean , is it to reward the government of Israel. What about establishing Emaar Palestine will achieve? Palestine is not Dubai, as a lot of corruption are spread and most properly that any financial or economic development will be wasted , just like the billion of Euro spent the EU which has gone into the pocket of Yasser Arafat and his aids of Ministers.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.desert-voice.net/news_from_uae.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.desert-voice.net/news_from_uae.htm</a><a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=462275', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the fly-man</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/01/the-uae-secrecy-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-462271</link>
		<dc:creator>the fly-man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 20:38:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/01/the-uae-secrecy-myth/#comment-462271</guid>
		<description>This secrecy thing is to provide cover for the rank and I mean Rank and file GOP who know what&#039;s going on but it is in their best interest to keep a low cover and let The President take all the flak. He just turns around and says too bad this is Foreign policy,  we are at War, and this is necessary. he runs the country like a CEO, sorta like Ken Lay. &quot;Hey I can&#039;t be bothered with Every detail.&quot; I swear the best metaphor I can come up with is he is Toonces the Cat. Off the cliff we go...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This secrecy thing is to provide cover for the rank and I mean Rank and file GOP who know what&#8217;s going on but it is in their best interest to keep a low cover and let The President take all the flak. He just turns around and says too bad this is Foreign policy,  we are at War, and this is necessary. he runs the country like a CEO, sorta like Ken Lay. &#8220;Hey I can&#8217;t be bothered with Every detail.&#8221; I swear the best metaphor I can come up with is he is Toonces the Cat. Off the cliff we go&#8230;<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=462271', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clif</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/01/the-uae-secrecy-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-462260</link>
		<dc:creator>Clif</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 20:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/01/the-uae-secrecy-myth/#comment-462260</guid>
		<description>Yes and the military commanders who called for more troops to actually win the battle and the peace in Iraq, 

or Bremer who says he asked for more troops in 2003, 

and the Army war college study that said without good planning the post war occupation was going to become a quagmire,

or the NASA scientists being overruled by a 24 year old political appointee who lied on his resume to get the political appointment in the first place.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes and the military commanders who called for more troops to actually win the battle and the peace in Iraq, </p>
<p>or Bremer who says he asked for more troops in 2003, </p>
<p>and the Army war college study that said without good planning the post war occupation was going to become a quagmire,</p>
<p>or the NASA scientists being overruled by a 24 year old political appointee who lied on his resume to get the political appointment in the first place&#8230;..<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=462260', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spudge_Boy</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/01/the-uae-secrecy-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-462254</link>
		<dc:creator>Spudge_Boy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 20:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/01/the-uae-secrecy-myth/#comment-462254</guid>
		<description>Clif,

DO you mean like the intelligence guys that put together the August 6, 2001 Presidential Daily Briefing that said &quot;bin Laden determined to attack inside the US&quot;?

Or do you mean the FEMA managers calling for help during Katrina and got none, while Bush ate cake with McCain And &quot;played&quot; guitar in San Diego.

Or do you mean all the people saying that Hamas had a good chance of winning the election while Rice said &quot;Who woulda thunk it&quot;

Or do you mean......

The list goes on and on and on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clif,</p>
<p>DO you mean like the intelligence guys that put together the August 6, 2001 Presidential Daily Briefing that said &#8220;bin Laden determined to attack inside the US&#8221;?</p>
<p>Or do you mean the FEMA managers calling for help during Katrina and got none, while Bush ate cake with McCain And &#8220;played&#8221; guitar in San Diego.</p>
<p>Or do you mean all the people saying that Hamas had a good chance of winning the election while Rice said &#8220;Who woulda thunk it&#8221;</p>
<p>Or do you mean&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>The list goes on and on and on.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=462254', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clif</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/01/the-uae-secrecy-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-462250</link>
		<dc:creator>Clif</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 20:16:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/01/the-uae-secrecy-myth/#comment-462250</guid>
		<description>#21 Spudge I understand that what I was saying the competent employees of homeland security , like the Coast Guard did oppose the deal, but Bush got Chertoff to overrule and Classify their objections to cover their collective asses. This happens in every department of the administration. I agree with your post and was pointing out how the Homeland security department could be against the deal, by having people who know actually look at the problems of port security, and oppose the deal for it, before they are for the deal, a political decision made by a political appointee, for the benefit of the President</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#21 Spudge I understand that what I was saying the competent employees of homeland security , like the Coast Guard did oppose the deal, but Bush got Chertoff to overrule and Classify their objections to cover their collective asses. This happens in every department of the administration. I agree with your post and was pointing out how the Homeland security department could be against the deal, by having people who know actually look at the problems of port security, and oppose the deal for it, before they are for the deal, a political decision made by a political appointee, for the benefit of the President<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=462250', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
