Well being that I Invented the technology called HAARP, and they have increased funding for it
http://www.brojon.org/frontpage/bj040501.html
http://www.rense.com/general44/haarp.htm
http://www.mediarare.com/haarp.html
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=haarp+funding&btnG=Google+Search
and defunded CO2 emmissions programs causing Global Warming to continue to rise, I say yes. HE CAUSED THE HURRICANE, OK. I know for a fact that HAARP can cause Weather changes. I know, I did it, so screw you.

“2) Bush knew then did nothing because he wanted black people and democratic voters to die.”

That is evidenciary on its face.

“3) For five consecutive years prior to the hurricane which he and his administration caused Bush alocated funds for levy improvements, more than any other president”

Even the Germans know that the money was only being “budgeted” for the levees.
http://service.spiegel.de/cache/international/0,1518,372455,00.html

http://www.tpmcafe.com/story/2005/8/31/222419/214

“In early 2004, as the cost of the conflict in Iraq soared, President Bush proposed spending less than 20 percent of what the Corps said was needed for Lake Pontchartrain, according to a Feb. 16, 2004, article, in New Orleans CityBusiness.

On June 8, 2004, Walter Maestri, emergency management chief for Jefferson Parish, Louisiana; told the Times-Picayune: “It appears that the money has been moved in the president’s budget to handle homeland security and the war in Iraq, and I suppose that’s the price we pay. Nobody locally is happy that the levees can’t be finished, and we are doing everything we can to make the case that this is a security issue for us.”

So don’t say “SENT money”, when all the traitor-in-chief did was “BUDGET” money, that he then stole back, like everything else he has ever done.

“4) Bush made the democratic elected representatives, under a democratic governor and mayor, spend the funds dedicated for those levys, which he no longer had control over, on a bridge in Alaska.”

See above, and screw your bridge in Alaska to no where, even though it will help those dealing with my HAARP project.

I can’t wait till we hang THE LYING, TRAITOR OCCUPYING 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. by the neck in the WHITEHOUSE PORTICO, just like MUSSOLINI, for all to SPIT ON.

I wasn’t speaking of the typo…we all make them. It was the content and confusion.

Glad you’re here exposing the liberal left.
Another great American.
Another proud student of the Limbaugh Institute

The truth is you hate George Bush ! That is all, there is nothing more to the nonsense posted here or in any other forum.

Has Rush and Sean confused you a bit?

Don’t have the time to attempt to de-program you.

That’s a poor beginning. Did anyone, at any time, make that claim? I didn’t see it. You should lead off with your good material. Unless you don’t have any good material.

OK, and your number 6 is really interesting, to wit: “6) Bush knew the levys had broken and headed for the hills while the city’s busses were being flooded, leaving the populace without means of evacuation. Meanwhile he got in front a camera and began a series of curses that would make a sailor blush with shame.”

This at least seems to assume that Bush was in New Orleans, or posits that that is what we “liberal elite” types are saying. Downright weird. Where was that claimed. Now then, this:

“Meanwhile he got in front a camera and began a series of curses that would make a sailor blush with shame.”

I hate to use foul language indiscriminately, but sometimes there is no choice: what the /fuck/ are you referring to, sir? Again, your writing is so poor that it obscures at least 92% of what you might be trying to say. Are you saying that this is — again — what we “liberal elite” have accused GWB of doing? I don’t recall seeing this anywhere. Just plain weird.

I’d have more respect for the fine neo-con tradition of “just making shit up” if you guys would at least make up GOOD SHIT. Or at the least, SEMI-LITERATE shit. C’mon. You’re not even trying!!

If I understand you here (and believe me, I am straining to untangle the — cough — /logic/ you are so carefully employing in this fantasia of a paragraph), you are

1) Asking me whether I read the posts preceding your “botched” post, #62. My answer is no, sir, I did not. My reason was that neither your much shorter #63 (to which I was actually responding, forgive my arithmetical error) nor #62 gave me any reason to expect anything of interest in your other posts, and so I did not seek them out.

2) Telling me that “there is nothing to understand” in the posts you are taking me to task for not having read. Sorry, that’s what the sentence you typed /says/.

3) Telling me further that the intellectual value of those posts of yours which I ignored was even “less than it is of content,” whatever the hell THAT means (I confess I don’t understand the sentence). In essence you call your posts worthless (I think – your prose isn’t very good) but don’t seem to “get” why I didn’t eagerly seek them out and read them.

4) You proceed to explain — uh, I think — your understanding of what logic is per “the liberal argument” (again – that phrase is very confusing. Which liberal argument? And when did I ask you to parse your understanding of a liberal’s understanding of logic.

Let me tell you what I think logic is, William. And I am not referring to Wikipedia or anything.

Logic, sir, unless we are talking about mathematical or symbolic logic per someone like W.V.O Quine or Suzanne Langer’s entertaining introduction to the topic, is simply the forms of clear argument. Now, that definition is neither formal nor would it hold water in a Philosophy class of any depth whatever.

My beef with you and your ilk, sir, is that I am of the opinion that when you carelessly invoke the word “logic,” what you really mean is “my [yes, William, ONLY your] gut feeling” about a subject or question. It’s what people sometimes refer to as “common sense” (although I daresay Thomas Paine would have difficulty recognizing your peculiar version). “Logic” of this form takes the shape of statements like “killing fetuses is JUST WRONG. I /feel/ it!”

That’s not logic, sir.

Now, if you would like to spar further – bring it on. But I’d urge you to think clearly and then at least attempt to give clear verbal form to those thoughts. You will avoid looking even more foolish that way.

Thanks!

1) The Bush administration cause a hurricane.
2) Bush knew then did nothing because he wanted black people and democratic voters to die.
3) For five consecutive years prior to the hurricane which he and his administration caused Bush alocated funds for levy improvements, more than any other president
4) Bush made the democratic elected representatives, under a democratic governor and mayor, spend the funds dedicated for those levys, which he no longer had control over, on a bridge in Alaska.
5) Bush made the Governor of Louisana turn away initial federal assitance, because he didn’t want people seeking refuge in the superdome. ( for those that don’t know that is sarcasm. It was Katleen Blanco that turned away initial federal assistance because she did not want more people in the superdome)
6) Bush knew the levys had broken and headed for the hills while the city’s busses were being flooded, leaving the populace without means of evacuation. Meanwhile he got in front a camera and began a series of curses that would make a sailor blush with shame.

Perhaps it is you who don’t understand Glenn. I understand perfectly, logic and reason defeat your argument. Infact it is a useless tool to you. Like driving in a nail with a water ballon. stupidity and ignorance are two great assets for you. assuring the foundation for any argument you wish to put forward. Like the one for which this thread is devoted, and your post.

“so does the left now like Drownie, the fashion god?

You people are transparent to a fault.”

That is RICH, sir!

Nothing changes the fact that “Drownie,” as you so droll-ly call him, was a crony appointment if ever there was one. Not unlike the NASA stooge who thought the Old Testament deity a better scientific theory than the Big Bang.

However, it really /is/ interesting to see footage (undoubtedly fabricated by slobbering communist gay skeleton aliens with vast powers over time and space) demonstrating that Mr. Brown may not have been quite as clueless as we all thought.

See, the problem is, you could prop up a shrivelled dead circus clown next to George Dumbya (oh hee hee ha ha my sides! land sakes!) and he would look like a nuclear physicist. The footage did the unthinkable and juxtaposed GWB with people who seemed to know what concern, probing questions and research — indeed, what life beyond mere breathing and staring gap-mouthed — were.

Transparent? I guess so. You /do/ know what I’m thinking, don’t you?

In re: your

“Why is it that when liberals are ask to confront an issue with logic and reason they return with stupidity and insults? ( refering to #60 and #61 )”

Well I for one reject the term “stupidity” because I suspect it would be more honest for you to have typed “stuff I don’t understand,” instead. Moreover, I have yet to see a single display of anything I would describe as “logic and reason” from, well, people like YOU. Do you even know what logic /is/?

But to answer your question directly: I do it because you all make it so easy. And it’s fun, too, because I’ve been so incredibly angry at all you half-wits for years. Happy now? Yes. Yes. Yes. I /do/ think you are stupid. Prove me wrong, Descartes

This is so true.

In order to be hurt, one must have feelings. A nervous system that is not calcified. A brain.

Let us compare the Terri Schiavo incident, wherein the only person not harmed in any way was Terri herself (not believing in a soul or afterlife, I do not admit the possibility that she had to look down from above on what a shameful spectacle the Right made of this sad affair).

Can’t hurt if ya can’t care. And being uncaring is a high level neo-con mission. Cuz caring, you see, it’s for GIRLS and if guys do it, well, it’s kinda faggoty-looking. And besides, it might cost money.

Why is it that when liberals are ask to confront an issue with logic and reason they return with stupidity and insults ? ( refering to #60 and #61 )

I am sorry but that does “say it all”. The truth is you hate George Bush ! That is all, there is nothing more to the nonsense posted here or in any other forum.

I suppose I could feel insulted, or put in my place, by someone who supports the inane notion that the aftermath of an unpredictable and uncontrolable force of nature is the responsiblitly of one man. However I would rather consider the “intelligence” of the source. Someone who has the knowledge that the same event affected the entire gulf coast. Yet fails to notice that only the area which was mismanaged, and later abandoned, by it’s democratic leader ship was incapable of meeting the needs of it’s people in time of crisis.

Perhaps my mental capacity is so minuscule it only allows me to see that. I would argue that information is far more signifigant than the witless inquiry of “George Bush knew !”

The truth is I don’t think that anyone who is itelligent enough to read this doesn’t know that. Including those who say that it is not true.

Says it all.

So what happened to that money ? Why wasn’t it spent on levy repairs, or a better term; “modifications” ? Who handled tat money after it was recieved by the state of Louisanna ? And how does this have anything to do with Bush knowing the levy had broken ?

After the levy had broken millions of gallons and cubic square feet water begin rushing in on the city of New Orleans. So again what if Bush knew ? What was he going to do ? Washington and the organizations at Bush command were over 2000 miles away and had yet to even be called into action. It is concievable that those groups could have taken as much as two days to gather a deploy. George Bush was not present on site when the damage and impending destruction manifested in New Orleans. Who was ? What did the authorities present in New Orleans do ?

Even if you hypothysize that George Bush knew that the levys “could” break before the storm you could not hold him to being clarivoiant. He couldn’t have known that the storm was going to be that severe, where it was going to strike, or that the levys were in fact going to break.

This frame of mind is so ridiculous. “See … George Bush knew !!! This is grounds for impeachment.” I would love to tell you if John Kerry had been president he would have done exactly what Bush didn’t do and everything would be alright. The fact is events like this with circumstance that are beyond our ability to control, and the result would have been the same regardless of who was president.

The truth is I don’t think that anyone who is itelligent enough to read this doesn’t know that. Including those who say that it is not true.

RP…you’re awesome! Rarely do I hear (read, see) the reight so eloquently deflated.