Comments on: Is John Hinderaker Nuts? http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/05/is-john-hinderaker-nuts/ Thu, 26 Nov 2009 03:25:45 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: William K. Wolfrum » Blog Archive » Holy Crap! This blog uses the F-Word while talking about John Hinderaker http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/05/is-john-hinderaker-nuts/comment-page-3/#comment-1969860 William K. Wolfrum » Blog Archive » Holy Crap! This blog uses the F-Word while talking about John Hinderaker Fri, 02 Mar 2007 11:39:12 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/05/is-john-hinderaker-nuts/#comment-1969860 [...] to make an important point - that liberals swear more than conservatives - Hinderaker showed off the type of thought process that has made him one of PNAC’s favorite humans. I conclude from this that the survey was [...] [...] to make an important point – that liberals swear more than conservatives – Hinderaker showed off the type of thought process that has made him one of PNAC’s favorite humans. I conclude from this that the survey was [...]

]]> By: jan petterson http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/05/is-john-hinderaker-nuts/comment-page-3/#comment-637677 jan petterson Sat, 24 Jun 2006 01:49:41 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/05/is-john-hinderaker-nuts/#comment-637677 Like all good soldiers, John Murtha should just fade away. Like all good soldiers, John Murtha should just fade away.

]]> By: A Newer World » Blog Archive » Covering Up a Cover Up in Haditha http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/05/is-john-hinderaker-nuts/comment-page-3/#comment-583631 A Newer World » Blog Archive » Covering Up a Cover Up in Haditha Tue, 30 May 2006 03:18:59 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/05/is-john-hinderaker-nuts/#comment-583631 [...] Murtha’s latest apparent crime against America is his vocal calls for an open and honest accounting of what happened in Haditha, Iraq on November 19, 2005. John Hinderaker calls the alleged slaughter of over 20 unarmed Iraqi men, women, and children, “a very bad news story,” and like, Gaius of Blue Crab Boulevard, wishes Murtha would just shut up about the whole thing. Like Dan Riehl, these commentators slam Murtha as a “a cheap political hack.” Apparently, in their view, Murtha is trying to use the events in Haditha as “a political football” for his own partisan purposes. [...] [...] Murtha’s latest apparent crime against America is his vocal calls for an open and honest accounting of what happened in Haditha, Iraq on November 19, 2005. John Hinderaker calls the alleged slaughter of over 20 unarmed Iraqi men, women, and children, “a very bad news story,” and like, Gaius of Blue Crab Boulevard, wishes Murtha would just shut up about the whole thing. Like Dan Riehl, these commentators slam Murtha as a “a cheap political hack.” Apparently, in their view, Murtha is trying to use the events in Haditha as “a political football” for his own partisan purposes. [...]

]]> By: Duct cleaning Ottawa http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/05/is-john-hinderaker-nuts/comment-page-3/#comment-472097 Duct cleaning Ottawa Sat, 11 Mar 2006 05:31:13 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/05/is-john-hinderaker-nuts/#comment-472097 With Air quality being an issue with so many people these days, we have noticed a huge increase in our business, which is Duct Cleaning. We entertain many phone calls on a daily basis and it seems that we are consistently asked the same questions. We decided to put up an faq page on our website to help answer all those questions. please browse our website at http://www.ductcleaningottawa.com and feel free to drop us an email at any time With Air quality being an issue with so many people these days, we have noticed a huge increase in our business, which is Duct Cleaning.

We entertain many phone calls on a daily basis and it seems that we are consistently asked the same questions.

We decided to put up an faq page on our website to help answer all those questions.

please browse our website at http://www.ductcleaningottawa.com and feel free to drop us an email at any time

]]> By: ben brung http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/05/is-john-hinderaker-nuts/comment-page-3/#comment-468840 ben brung Wed, 08 Mar 2006 04:30:51 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/05/is-john-hinderaker-nuts/#comment-468840 Oh crap. Now they want us to see shades of grey, stop using BS and stick to facts. Next comes seas boiling and rocks melting. Let's see did I lock the screen door? Check. Send back Netflix? Check. Kiss ass goodbye? Check. Oh crap. Now they want us to see shades of grey, stop using BS and stick to facts.

Next comes seas boiling and rocks melting. Let’s see did I lock the screen door? Check. Send back Netflix? Check. Kiss ass goodbye? Check.

]]> By: Thomas Paine http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/05/is-john-hinderaker-nuts/comment-page-3/#comment-468728 Thomas Paine Wed, 08 Mar 2006 01:39:19 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/05/is-john-hinderaker-nuts/#comment-468728 "A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and he carries his banners openly. But the traitor moves among those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the galleys, heard in the very hall of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor—he speaks in the accents familiar to his victims, and wears their face and their garment, and he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation—he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of a city—he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to be feared." --Cicero, 42 B.C.E. “A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within.

An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and he carries his banners openly. But the traitor moves among those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the galleys, heard in the very hall of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor—he speaks in the accents familiar to his victims, and wears their face and their garment, and he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation—he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of a city—he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to be feared.” –Cicero, 42 B.C.E.

]]> By: Redleg http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/05/is-john-hinderaker-nuts/comment-page-3/#comment-468290 Redleg Tue, 07 Mar 2006 18:32:47 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/05/is-john-hinderaker-nuts/#comment-468290 Seixon, Save the platitudes for someone who cares. We damn well ought to be making more progress in Iraq, considering that we have spent hundreds of billions of dollars there. Perhaps if Bush actually had a feasible plan for winning the peace things would be going better- so much for expecting good judgment from the feckless turd. The problem is that the insurgency is becoming more vigorous and destructive and is undoing many of the infrastructure repairs we have made. Staying there will only make matters worse- we must leave Iraq. Seixon,
Save the platitudes for someone who cares. We damn well ought to be making more progress in Iraq, considering that we have spent hundreds of billions of dollars there. Perhaps if Bush actually had a feasible plan for winning the peace things would be going better- so much for expecting good judgment from the feckless turd.

The problem is that the insurgency is becoming more vigorous and destructive and is undoing many of the infrastructure repairs we have made. Staying there will only make matters worse- we must leave Iraq.

]]> By: Seixon http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/05/is-john-hinderaker-nuts/comment-page-3/#comment-468245 Seixon Tue, 07 Mar 2006 18:10:41 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/05/is-john-hinderaker-nuts/#comment-468245 Redleg, Way to see things in black and white my friend. No, things are not hunky-dory in Iraq, but that doesn't mean you can just make up a bunch of BS. Obviously things aren't bad enough in Iraq as they are since you keep having to exaggerate and lie about it. Why not just stick to the facts? We are making progress in some areas, doing poorly in others. Try to put a little color in your black and white world. Redleg,

Way to see things in black and white my friend. No, things are not hunky-dory in Iraq, but that doesn’t mean you can just make up a bunch of BS. Obviously things aren’t bad enough in Iraq as they are since you keep having to exaggerate and lie about it. Why not just stick to the facts?

We are making progress in some areas, doing poorly in others. Try to put a little color in your black and white world.

]]> By: ben brung http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/05/is-john-hinderaker-nuts/comment-page-3/#comment-467861 ben brung Tue, 07 Mar 2006 09:22:41 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/05/is-john-hinderaker-nuts/#comment-467861 Oh my gosh. Isn't it cute when they actually try to use statistics to make an argument and then get all frustrated when they think you are just taking things out of context and spinnning. This must be a sign of desperation. Can anyone ever remember them caring about the facts before we went into war? The facts don't scare us you morons . . . In fact, let's declassify every damn thing that's not a bonefide national security issue and then hash it all out. On the left we will brace for four or five corrections or apologies and on the right you can get ready for the war crimes tribunal. Cute little bastards. Oh my gosh. Isn’t it cute when they actually try to use statistics to make an argument and then get all frustrated when they think you are just taking things out of context and spinnning.

This must be a sign of desperation. Can anyone ever remember them caring about the facts before we went into war? The facts don’t scare us you morons . . . In fact, let’s declassify every damn thing that’s not a bonefide national security issue and then hash it all out. On the left we will brace for four or five corrections or apologies and on the right you can get ready for the war crimes tribunal. Cute little bastards.

]]> By: Redleg http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/05/is-john-hinderaker-nuts/comment-page-3/#comment-467763 Redleg Tue, 07 Mar 2006 03:37:20 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/05/is-john-hinderaker-nuts/#comment-467763 Seixon, I guess things must be hunky-dory in Iraq. Thanks for setting us straight. Your math is the same as Bush used when he told us he would take care of the national debt using targeted tax cuts. Seixon,
I guess things must be hunky-dory in Iraq. Thanks for setting us straight. Your math is the same as Bush used when he told us he would take care of the national debt using targeted tax cuts.

]]> By: Seixon http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/05/is-john-hinderaker-nuts/comment-page-3/#comment-467666 Seixon Tue, 07 Mar 2006 01:18:51 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/05/is-john-hinderaker-nuts/#comment-467666 casey, Power Line, Malkin, and Instapundit do not have comments because the proprietors don't want to wade through insane amounts of name-calling, bashing, smearing, and all that wonderfulness. Joshua Marshall has no comments. DailyKos has them, but you have to actually register at the site, and you have to wait 24 hours to post a comment. The commenters at DailyKos and LGF are pretty similar in their partisanship, which is mostly due to the way in which registrations are done, and the fact that any heavy dissenters are tossed out. I have something planned to alleviate the problem you speak of, though. Hopefully I will be able to materialize it. casey,

Power Line, Malkin, and Instapundit do not have comments because the proprietors don’t want to wade through insane amounts of name-calling, bashing, smearing, and all that wonderfulness. Joshua Marshall has no comments. DailyKos has them, but you have to actually register at the site, and you have to wait 24 hours to post a comment.

The commenters at DailyKos and LGF are pretty similar in their partisanship, which is mostly due to the way in which registrations are done, and the fact that any heavy dissenters are tossed out.

I have something planned to alleviate the problem you speak of, though. Hopefully I will be able to materialize it.

]]> By: casey http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/05/is-john-hinderaker-nuts/comment-page-3/#comment-467621 casey Tue, 07 Mar 2006 00:28:23 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/05/is-john-hinderaker-nuts/#comment-467621 There is one thing and one thing alone that speaks more about a blog's grasp on reality than anything else - does it have a public comments section? Blogs that do not have comments, have a reason for it. Powerline, Michelle Malkin, etc. the biggies don't have comments sections. The only way you can point out their idiocy is by naming them in your own blog, thus increasing their page rank. There is one thing and one thing alone that speaks more about a blog’s grasp on reality than anything else – does it have a public comments section?

Blogs that do not have comments, have a reason for it. Powerline, Michelle Malkin, etc. the biggies don’t have comments sections. The only way you can point out their idiocy is by naming them in your own blog, thus increasing their page rank.

]]> By: wake up and smell the hoses http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/05/is-john-hinderaker-nuts/comment-page-3/#comment-467605 wake up and smell the hoses Tue, 07 Mar 2006 00:15:41 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/05/is-john-hinderaker-nuts/#comment-467605 Wake up! This administration has been about ONE THING and one thing only. The religious right agenda, the wars-for-oil, the subversion of the media, etc …all smokescreens. This administration only took power to do one thing: <b>TO TRANSFER THE PUBLIC WEALTH OF THE RICHEST COUNTRY IN THE WORLD INTO PRIVATE HANDS. </b>This admin has been straight-arrow loot-and-pillage on an epic scale. If Guiness had a world record book of crime, this is it, folks, the crime of the millenia. The wealth of the wealthiest country has already been looted, robbed and diverted from public coffers and banked in the accounts of private contractors, armament industries, communication and energy companies, favorite drug companies (what do you think the Medicare change was about?) and private buddy corporations during the last 5 years. What’s truly horrifying is is wasn’t just the surplus the admin inherited or revenue from the last 5 years. This deficit will have our kids and grandkids enslaved and endebted throughout their lifetimes. The services designed for their benefit have been and will be cut to fix this ‘money problem.’ That’s a killer coup, eh? Not just to steal the money, but to steal it in such a way that an entire nation will work 2-1/2 lifetimes, with far fewer safety nets, to try and replace it. And then to set up a bunch of new tax cuts for the wealthiest (ie: the beneficiaries of all our public money) that insures they and theirs will never have to be responsible for paying back any of it! Period. That’s what all about, the erupting scandals, Bush never vetoeing a bill, that’s why we went to war. It’s all about the money. We’ve all been hosed, by leaders who haven’t hesistated to leave 3 generation of American tax payers naked and bleeding on the ground, and 1000s of people dead and bleeding in the sands of the Middle East. (1000s so far. Just watch...this has been too much fun for them, like taking candy from a baby, can't turn the war milk cow into hamburger yet.) It’s too late. We’re all screwed and they’re rich beyond a glutton’s wettest dream. They stole America’s money. We let them. It’s gone. Better wake up before the administration finally figures out how to transfer Social Security — the last, vast, untapped oil field of federal and public monies — into the pockets of the brokerage house. Wake up! This administration has been about ONE THING and one thing only. The religious right agenda, the wars-for-oil, the subversion of the media, etc …all smokescreens. This administration only took power to do one thing: TO TRANSFER THE PUBLIC WEALTH OF THE RICHEST COUNTRY IN THE WORLD INTO PRIVATE HANDS.
This admin has been straight-arrow loot-and-pillage on an epic scale. If Guiness had a world record book of crime, this is it, folks, the crime of the millenia. The wealth of the wealthiest country has already been looted, robbed and diverted from public coffers and banked in the accounts of private contractors, armament industries, communication and energy companies, favorite drug companies (what do you think the Medicare change was about?) and private buddy corporations during the last 5 years.
What’s truly horrifying is is wasn’t just the surplus the admin inherited or revenue from the last 5 years. This deficit will have our kids and grandkids enslaved and endebted throughout their lifetimes. The services designed for their benefit have been and will be cut to fix this ‘money problem.’ That’s a killer coup, eh? Not just to steal the money, but to steal it in such a way that an entire nation will work 2-1/2 lifetimes, with far fewer safety nets, to try and replace it. And then to set up a bunch of new tax cuts for the wealthiest (ie: the beneficiaries of all our public money) that insures they and theirs will never have to be responsible for paying back any of it!
Period. That’s what all about, the erupting scandals, Bush never vetoeing a bill, that’s why we went to war. It’s all about the money.
We’ve all been hosed, by leaders who haven’t hesistated to leave 3 generation of American tax payers naked and bleeding on the ground, and 1000s of people dead and bleeding in the sands of the Middle East. (1000s so far. Just watch…this has been too much fun for them, like taking candy from a baby, can’t turn the war milk cow into hamburger yet.)
It’s too late. We’re all screwed and they’re rich beyond a glutton’s wettest dream. They stole America’s money. We let them. It’s gone.
Better wake up before the administration finally figures out how to transfer Social Security — the last, vast, untapped oil field of federal and public monies — into the pockets of the brokerage house.

]]> By: Seixon http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/05/is-john-hinderaker-nuts/comment-page-3/#comment-467491 Seixon Mon, 06 Mar 2006 22:56:28 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/05/is-john-hinderaker-nuts/#comment-467491 Judd scores another one for propaganda. When your lies are uncovered... just go back to repeating the same lies! Brilliant work. When we show how you take things out of context, and then you take things out of context again to try and prove you are right, you only end up looking like a complete tool, Judd. Let's go through these one by one, AGAIN: 1. Cheney said outside of where you snipped that Iraq could possibly acquire nuclear weapons. So obviously Cheney can't be claiming that Iraq both has nukes and that they might some day get them. It's wonderful that you took what he said out of context to fool your blind readers once again. Others are not as easily fooled. 2. VoA said "30 to 60 percent", and most estimates put it lower than that. Saying it is 60% is misleading and/or false. 3. If you can't see the discrepancy between "only 30% of people getting water" and 71% that "rarely have safe, clean water", I just can't help you guys. It's misleading and false. 4. 82% of Iraqis are opposed to us being there, but if you looked at another poll question, it says that only 26% of Iraqis want the USA to leave right now. 5. A "collaborative relationship" is not the same as a "connection". Why must we always have to sludge through the same tired points again and again? I have a connection with many people in my life, that doesn't mean I have a collaborative relationship with them all. Thus, alleging a "connection" between al Qaeda and Saddam is not the same as alleging a "collaborative relationship". Stop spinning it. I see you didn't manage to spin the other 4 lies Murtha came up with during his screed, and I bet your readers won't really care to know about them either. Unfortunate really. When you defend statements that are so obviously false on their face, that you have to go taking things out of context to support them, it is just pathetic and childish. It's OK to admit that Murtha is not telling the truth. Go find another hero to hide behind. Oh. Right, Murtha was your only luck at credibility since he's a veteran. Darn. Better luck next time. Judd scores another one for propaganda. When your lies are uncovered… just go back to repeating the same lies! Brilliant work. When we show how you take things out of context, and then you take things out of context again to try and prove you are right, you only end up looking like a complete tool, Judd.

Let’s go through these one by one, AGAIN:

1. Cheney said outside of where you snipped that Iraq could possibly acquire nuclear weapons. So obviously Cheney can’t be claiming that Iraq both has nukes and that they might some day get them. It’s wonderful that you took what he said out of context to fool your blind readers once again. Others are not as easily fooled.

2. VoA said “30 to 60 percent”, and most estimates put it lower than that. Saying it is 60% is misleading and/or false.

3. If you can’t see the discrepancy between “only 30% of people getting water” and 71% that “rarely have safe, clean water”, I just can’t help you guys. It’s misleading and false.

4. 82% of Iraqis are opposed to us being there, but if you looked at another poll question, it says that only 26% of Iraqis want the USA to leave right now.

5. A “collaborative relationship” is not the same as a “connection”. Why must we always have to sludge through the same tired points again and again? I have a connection with many people in my life, that doesn’t mean I have a collaborative relationship with them all. Thus, alleging a “connection” between al Qaeda and Saddam is not the same as alleging a “collaborative relationship”. Stop spinning it.

I see you didn’t manage to spin the other 4 lies Murtha came up with during his screed, and I bet your readers won’t really care to know about them either. Unfortunate really.

When you defend statements that are so obviously false on their face, that you have to go taking things out of context to support them, it is just pathetic and childish.

It’s OK to admit that Murtha is not telling the truth. Go find another hero to hide behind. Oh. Right, Murtha was your only luck at credibility since he’s a veteran. Darn. Better luck next time.

]]> By: Redleg http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/05/is-john-hinderaker-nuts/comment-page-3/#comment-467397 Redleg Mon, 06 Mar 2006 21:56:53 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/05/is-john-hinderaker-nuts/#comment-467397 Danny, Al Qaeda has as much a link with the USA as it did with Iraq. After all, the 9-11 hijackers took their flight training here, several even in Jeb Bush's state of Florida. And the Washington Times is a joke. Danny,
Al Qaeda has as much a link with the USA as it did with Iraq. After all, the 9-11 hijackers took their flight training here, several even in Jeb Bush’s state of Florida. And the Washington Times is a joke.

]]> By: Danny http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/05/is-john-hinderaker-nuts/comment-page-3/#comment-467327 Danny Mon, 06 Mar 2006 21:09:50 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/05/is-john-hinderaker-nuts/#comment-467327 There was a link between Al Qaeda and Iraq. Your quote about there being no link is out of context ... and I think you know it. The quote you provided was saying that Iraq didn't help directly with the 9/11 attacks ... which is what the 9/11 commission was looking into. But saying that Iraq and Al Qaeda didn't have a link is idiocy. http://www.washtimes.com/national/20031201-123723-4738r.htm There was a link between Al Qaeda and Iraq. Your quote about there being no link is out of context … and I think you know it.

The quote you provided was saying that Iraq didn’t help directly with the 9/11 attacks … which is what the 9/11 commission was looking into.

But saying that Iraq and Al Qaeda didn’t have a link is idiocy.
http://www.washtimes.com/national/20031201-123723-4738r.htm

]]> By: Liberal Military Officer http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/05/is-john-hinderaker-nuts/comment-page-3/#comment-467295 Liberal Military Officer Mon, 06 Mar 2006 20:43:39 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/05/is-john-hinderaker-nuts/#comment-467295 My email to JH: Dear Mr Hinderaker, I'm a little curious about your reporting on Powerline and whether you are able to reason. Do you only attack the messenger or can you also garner facts and use persuasion? I'm a member of the military and I happen to agree with Congressman Murtha. You see he is correct and is using well established facts to back up his arguments. Can you do the same? http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/05/is-john-hinderaker-nuts/ Thank you, Steve Bremner, Maj, USAF My email to JH:

Dear Mr Hinderaker,

I’m a little curious about your reporting on Powerline and whether you are able to reason. Do you only attack the messenger or can you also garner facts and use persuasion?

I’m a member of the military and I happen to agree with Congressman Murtha. You see he is correct and is using well established facts to back up his arguments. Can you do the same?

http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/05/is-john-hinderaker-nuts/

Thank you,

Steve Bremner, Maj, USAF

]]> By: rev. frank halse http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/05/is-john-hinderaker-nuts/comment-page-3/#comment-467249 rev. frank halse Mon, 06 Mar 2006 20:12:25 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/05/is-john-hinderaker-nuts/#comment-467249 The function of the anus is to pass human offal so it doesn't rot and destroy the body. Otherwise, anus is a much abused term that misses the above point altogether. The problem with human offal, if you live in rural China, is that it has some virtue in terms of boosting the production of the fields. Here in America, it mostly resides in Washington, D.C., with some outposts in the various media. There is no virtue there. The function of the anus is to pass human offal so it doesn’t rot and destroy the body. Otherwise, anus is a much abused term that misses the above point altogether. The problem with human offal, if you live in rural China, is that it has some virtue in terms of boosting the production of the fields.

Here in America, it mostly resides in Washington, D.C., with some outposts in the various media. There is no virtue there.

]]> By: dAVE http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/05/is-john-hinderaker-nuts/comment-page-3/#comment-467226 dAVE Mon, 06 Mar 2006 19:58:14 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/05/is-john-hinderaker-nuts/#comment-467226 I seem to recall someone in the administration saying that Saddam was 6 months away from having a nuclear weapon. Can anyone find that quote? I seem to recall someone in the administration saying that Saddam was 6 months away from having a nuclear weapon. Can anyone find that quote?

]]> By: Marie http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/05/is-john-hinderaker-nuts/comment-page-3/#comment-467217 Marie Mon, 06 Mar 2006 19:50:54 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/05/is-john-hinderaker-nuts/#comment-467217 I don't know that he is nuts - but he cannot distinguish truth from lies. He distorts and misrepresents facts when making his false points. He is dangerous because people believe him - but that is one of the prices we pay for freedom of speech. Unfortunately, his lies are propaganda for the administration that is determined to limit if not destroy freedom of speech for those who do not agree with them. He is being used by Bush&Co but he can't see that yet -- he will when they have no further use for him. Perhaps that day will come when there is a backlash against the likes of him, along with A. Coulter, P. Robertson, B. O'Reilly, as they become a mockery of pundits in the public eye. Their outrageous and unsubstantiated claims are being ridiculed more frequently of late, and when these fools like Hinderaker are of no value, they will be tossed away. I don’t know that he is nuts – but he cannot distinguish truth from lies. He distorts and misrepresents facts when making his false points. He is dangerous because people believe him – but that is one of the prices we pay for freedom of speech. Unfortunately, his lies are propaganda for the administration that is determined to limit if not destroy freedom of speech for those who do not agree with them.
He is being used by Bush&Co but he can’t see that yet — he will when they have no further use for him. Perhaps that day will come when there is a backlash against the likes of
him, along with A. Coulter, P. Robertson, B. O’Reilly, as they become a mockery of pundits in the public eye. Their outrageous and unsubstantiated claims are being ridiculed more frequently of late, and when these fools like Hinderaker are of no value, they will be tossed away.

]]>