Comment by I-RIGHT-I — March 14, 2006 @ 2:57 pm

I’d have to verify your credentials first…

Comment by unbelievable

She’s ALL woman. Take it from an expert.

Comment by For Truth — March 14, 2006 @ 12:57 pm

Since he got his blow up doll pregnant…

Since when do you care about anyone getting hurt?

Comment by Lora — March 14, 2006 @ 9:45 am

I have to agree, as an educated woman myself, that MA is very suspicious. Though women have variances and nuances in their backgrounds and behaviors, her is simply an anomoly from the hundreds of women I have known in my life.

There’s nothing feminine about her. I know man-hating lesbians who have some ‘girly’ traits, as a part of tehir cultural indoctrination as girls, but MA has not one that I can define.

RightPunch believes that she is Jeffrey Shawn – a gay man parading as a woman. The parallels between the two are abundant enough in themselves, but there’s more as Lora pointed out. And, I don’t know of a single woman who refers to her husband as Mr. Her Name. Though I have known plenty of gay men who refer to their partners as such. It makes sense that MA is NOT a woman.

I look forward to hearing from you in future, and will make sure I archive your post for my female friends that I believe would appreciate your concise dissertation on the partisan brain!

MA — Try “fomenting.” That’s an actual word.

Aren’t you supposed to be an attorney or something? Geez. I hope you’re in PI or SS disputes.

Comment by RunningDogLackey

To RunningDogLackey,
After a few months of observing Mighty Hypocrite’s rants here, I have concluded that this person is probably not a woman and definitely not a woman with a professional degree. My suspicions were first aroused by various inconsistencies in Mighty’s background, as reported by her/him/it.
As to the latter conclusion, I have observed in Mighty Hypocrite’s postings a chip-in-the-shoulder attitude towards people with Ph.Ds and/or Ivy League educations, which I find hard to believe that an actual J.D. would have (and which the women lawyers I know personally definitely do not have). Then there is her/his/its poor usage of the English language–ones like the non-existent word “fulmenting” that can’t be attributed to mere typos or stuck keys.
In regards to both the former and latter conclusions, on another thread, Mighty Hypocrite in rather graphic words accused Dr. Glenn Becker, a liberal/progressive poster she apparently has never met (nor have I, for the record) of lacking male genitals. This is simply not the sort of language any well-educated woman I know (or myself, a former Fulbright scholar with advanced degrees in East Asian languages) uses. I could give several other examples of vulgar language not normally used by the well-educated women I know, but I think you get the point and I don’t want to take up any more space here. Besides, my cats tell me they are hungry.

If he can’t be impeached because of it, then when CAN an American president be impeached?

IN FRONT OF A HAND-PICKED GROUP OF DOLTS, BUSH TALKS ABOUT TOP-SECRET INVENTIONS THAT WILL FINALLY TURN THE TIDE OF WAR. MEANWHILE, THE REST OF THE PARTY ARE PLANNING THEIR ESCAPE FROM THE SINKING SHIP.

JEEZE, HE REALLY IS STARTING TO SOUND LIKE HITLER IN THE BUNKER.

What has this child ever done to your country

You mean that large paramilitary force that we didn’t know about before we went in and then ignored during the invasion? That group that we left behind because they weren’t a primary target who ended up being the basis for the organized resistence?
Them?

Seems to me if your war plan encounters unanticipated situations while executing it, you would change the plan, not keep going forward like nothing’s wrong. But that’s just me. I’m sane.

How about all the foreign forces that we allowed to cross to Iraqi border while we were safeguarding all the oil fields and searching for Saddam?

Well, Iraq is a big country after all. Lots of borders. Guarding borders is hard work.

Try as you might, you just can’t cover up the failures of Pres. Bush and his crony machine.

Don’t worry, they’re trying.

How about all the foreign forces that we allowed to cross to Iraqi border while we were safeguarding all the oil fields and searching for Saddam?

Try as you might, you just can’t cover up the failures of Pres. Bush and his crony machine.

“No leadership, no strategy, no coordination, no structure and inaccessible to ordinary Iraqis.”
John Sawers, PM Tony Blair’s envoy to Baghdad in the aftermath of the invasion, in a memo written on May 11 2003, about the US administration in Iraq.
The Guardian: US postwar Iraq strategy a mess, Blair was told

This is even more evidence that people in the know recognised from the onset that the Iraq occupation was/would be a bloody mess. I feel truly sorry for the ordinary Iraqis who have had to endure so much for so long.

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article3462.htm

January 12, 2006

In “Bush: War critics may help enemy” by Jennifer Loven in the Press Democrat paper reveal an American President who’s backed against a wall, feeding the American public such tiresome mush while to the mainstream media it’s the breakfast of champions. Bush’s bursting confidence is blasting his critics, those who give “comfort to our adversaries.” At a Veterans of Foreign War in Washington, Bush spouts that victory in Iraq is a certainty. But he failed to mention what Jack Murtha stated that the attacks against American troops have gone up 20 times in two years. That the Sunni population in Iraq has yet to be equally represented by the Shiite controlled government, paving the way for more instability and bloodshed. The Shiite element in the Iraqi government has extreme close tie with Iran; the country that Bush seriously planning to invade. Also with the shortage of recruitment at an all time high Bush still refuses to institute a draft. And to top it off our arm forces aren’t decently equipped; both in material and personnel. These are just some of the problems and there’s much more but that will surpass the word limit for this editorial.