It is estimated that over 50 million Americans suffer from allergies, and of that number approximately 30 million American suffer from asthma.

Fox/White House News is far more dangerous then most people could ever imagine.

Comment by richsmith

First they’d have to prove in a court of law that they possess character. That would be problematic for those two gentlemen.

Dick Gephardt now works for Goldman Sachs as a lobbyist, and is currently lobbying in California in an attempt to get Goldman Sachs in on the largest public works project in California state history. Here is a story about it: A feeding frenzy for lobbyists

And how about some class-action lawsuits for slander and libel?

So maybe you’re right… as “mom” was sitting in my office telling bald-faced lies about her “piece of cr*p” spawn, I should have nodded knowingly, empathetically sighed, AND patted her hand. My purpose in dealing with “mom” was based on protecting Constitutional rights – if she needed to assuage her “guilt”, she should have talked to her priest or rabbi.

…but there’s no way in hell you can love both!

http://www.lobbyinginfo.org/search/results.cfm?searchtype=2&Org=2909

Oh my…the Goddess is correct too. Mrs Daschle is a registered lobbyist as well…for Pharma no less. Uh oh…this could be trouble…

Linda Daschle
Baker Donelson Bearman & Caldwell employs Lobbyist is Linda Daschle, wife of Senate Democratic Leader Tom Daschle of South Dakota. [1] (http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2001/0201.mencimer.html)

[edit]Jill Gimmel Daschle
Another lobbyist relation of the US Senator is his daughter-in-law, Jill Gimmel Daschle.

[edit]Airline Industry
Linda Daschle married the future senator in 1984 while she was working at the Civil Aeronautics Board. She later served as deputy administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration in the Clinton administration. Today, she is a lobbyist for Baker Donelson Bearman & Caldwell, where her clients include American Airlines, Boeing, and Lockheed Martin’s Air Traffic Management unit. [2] (http://moneycentral.msn.com/content/CNBCTV/Articles/TVReports/P57479.asp)

[edit]Drug Companies
Linda Daschle’s name shows on the form for her firm’s lobbying on behalf of Schering-Plough. At the time the company was seeking a patent extension on its anti-allergy drug, Claritin.

The company paid $470,000 to Daschle’s firm, Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz, the Thune ad ends with the line: “Only one candidate has personally profited from big drug companies. That candidate is Tom Daschle.” [3]

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Baker_Donelson_Bearman_%26_Caldwell#Jill_Gimmel_Daschle

Apologize huh? When pigs fly.

The the same can DEFINATELY be said of the NY Times and their liberal partisian agenda.

http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1002235060

Does anyone actually read this deceitful rag anymore?

It is time to treat FOX as a political entity under campaign finance regulations. Advertizing on Fox is no different from donating money to the Republican party, and the corporations that do so should not be able to write-off advertizing expenses before tax. The public must reclaim the airwaves as publically owned and demand that their use be regulated to benefit the entire public. At a minimum, we must re-instate the fairness doctrine.

How does this not apply to your words?
Oh sorry I forgot you are an imaginary character and can not participate in a debate.

Just a question do you believe honestly he is not making phone calls and setting up appointments for the “Lobbyists” to get in?

but anytime ‘politics’ is involved, at least one side of the story is usually worthless spin, sometimes both sides.
I agree fully with you on this one

A weather report that reported the temperature at a particular location at a particular time isn’t ‘wrong’ or ’skewed’ – it’s factual.
A Weather report isn’t an article. Once someone decides to turn it into more than a list of facts it will become skewed.

Should Fox write a correction that states “They all work for Lobbying firms”
Sure.

The impression from the site here is that Daschle was an innocent politician slandered by Fox. I just like to have as many facts as possible and not jump off the handle. TP should have wrote that Daschle did work for a Lobbying firm but was not a registered Lobbyist as Fox suggests. At least this way the people demanding a correction can at least sound informed when writing them. Sadly some people from here will write them and claim that he has nothing to do with any lobbying and tear down the whole purpose behind asking for honest reporting.

Suggestion for anyone that wants to waste some time:
Find any article from any where and research it/ I bet within 30 minutes you can prove any of them wrong or skewed.

Tom Daschle was working as a lobbyist in 2005 for Alston & Bird as a Special Policy Advisor. The report fox sources was prepared by Public Citizen in 2005, when Daschle was a lobbyist.

Dick Gephardt worked as lobbyist for Piper Rudnick and Gephardt & Associates in 2005.

They both are not currently working as lobbyist.

Let Fox know that you were suckered by a liberal website and are willing to believe anything you’re told, especially if it’s a slander against Fox.

Then write TP and demand a correction. Please be polite.

You missed this quote:

They are all former members of Congress — and they are all registered lobbyists.

They didn’t claim the democrats were ‘working for a company’, they claimed they were ‘registered lobbyists’.

The key word is ‘registered’, and that was the dishonesty.