<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: McClellan On British Memo: Bush&#8217;s Public and Private Iraq Statements Were &#8216;Fully Consistent&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/27/mcclellan-on-the-defensive-bushs-public-and-private-iraq-statements-were-fully-consistent/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/27/mcclellan-on-the-defensive-bushs-public-and-private-iraq-statements-were-fully-consistent/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 14:29:28 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Catch 22</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/27/mcclellan-on-the-defensive-bushs-public-and-private-iraq-statements-were-fully-consistent/comment-page-3/#comment-488309</link>
		<dc:creator>Catch 22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 18:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/27/mcclellan-on-the-defensive-bushs-public-and-private-iraq-statements-were-fully-consistent/#comment-488309</guid>
		<description>Freudian Slip?

Is it just a coincidence that the title of Bush&#039;s radio speech on March 8, 2003 when he makes the assertion &quot;We are doing everything we can to avoid war in Iraq.&quot; is:
&quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/03/20030308-1.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;IRAQ: DENIAL AND DECEPTION&lt;/a&gt;&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Freudian Slip?</p>
<p>Is it just a coincidence that the title of Bush&#8217;s radio speech on March 8, 2003 when he makes the assertion &#8220;We are doing everything we can to avoid war in Iraq.&#8221; is:<br />
&#8220;<a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/03/20030308-1.html" rel="nofollow">IRAQ: DENIAL AND DECEPTION</a>&#8220;<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=488309', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Redleg</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/27/mcclellan-on-the-defensive-bushs-public-and-private-iraq-statements-were-fully-consistent/comment-page-3/#comment-488111</link>
		<dc:creator>Redleg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 15:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/27/mcclellan-on-the-defensive-bushs-public-and-private-iraq-statements-were-fully-consistent/#comment-488111</guid>
		<description>Squegeeboo is absolutely right- the media is lying about these British memos.  I cannot imagine Bush ever trying to concoct a reason to go to war with Iraq.  After all, he told Helen Thomas just the other day that &quot;no president wants to go to war.&quot;  

Bush is probably the most honest and decent president we have had in the last 30 years.  If he says Saddam had WMDs, then I believe him, even though we have searched and searched and turned Iraq upside down looking for them and haven&#039;t YET found them.  I won&#039;t be surprised if we finally find some WMDs over there in 10 or 20 years of continous occupation.

As for the allegation that Bush suggested we paint a U.S. warplane to look like a U.N. plane and then use the plane to draw fire from Iraqi batteries is just insane.  We all know that Bush, given his many prodigous talents, doesn&#039;t have the creativity to come up with an idea like that.  That kind of creativity can only be a product of the liberal media in their attempt to make Bush look like a warmonger and liar.

So I say, let&#039;s ignore these press reports.  The media is just jealous of Bush&#039;s popularity with the American people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Squegeeboo is absolutely right- the media is lying about these British memos.  I cannot imagine Bush ever trying to concoct a reason to go to war with Iraq.  After all, he told Helen Thomas just the other day that &#8220;no president wants to go to war.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Bush is probably the most honest and decent president we have had in the last 30 years.  If he says Saddam had WMDs, then I believe him, even though we have searched and searched and turned Iraq upside down looking for them and haven&#8217;t YET found them.  I won&#8217;t be surprised if we finally find some WMDs over there in 10 or 20 years of continous occupation.</p>
<p>As for the allegation that Bush suggested we paint a U.S. warplane to look like a U.N. plane and then use the plane to draw fire from Iraqi batteries is just insane.  We all know that Bush, given his many prodigous talents, doesn&#8217;t have the creativity to come up with an idea like that.  That kind of creativity can only be a product of the liberal media in their attempt to make Bush look like a warmonger and liar.</p>
<p>So I say, let&#8217;s ignore these press reports.  The media is just jealous of Bush&#8217;s popularity with the American people.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=488111', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaded Prole</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/27/mcclellan-on-the-defensive-bushs-public-and-private-iraq-statements-were-fully-consistent/comment-page-3/#comment-488073</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaded Prole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 15:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/27/mcclellan-on-the-defensive-bushs-public-and-private-iraq-statements-were-fully-consistent/#comment-488073</guid>
		<description>Another &lt;a&gt;memo&lt;/a&gt; regarding Colin Powell&#039;s admissions to Jack Straw is making the news as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another <a>memo</a> regarding Colin Powell&#8217;s admissions to Jack Straw is making the news as well.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=488073', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: squegeeboo</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/27/mcclellan-on-the-defensive-bushs-public-and-private-iraq-statements-were-fully-consistent/comment-page-3/#comment-487917</link>
		<dc:creator>squegeeboo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 13:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/27/mcclellan-on-the-defensive-bushs-public-and-private-iraq-statements-were-fully-consistent/#comment-487917</guid>
		<description>Ryan

Those are the same memo extracts that every website/news source is using, where is the actual memo they came from?  My point was why won&#039;t the Gray Lady, or any other media outlet publish the memo if they have it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan</p>
<p>Those are the same memo extracts that every website/news source is using, where is the actual memo they came from?  My point was why won&#8217;t the Gray Lady, or any other media outlet publish the memo if they have it.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=487917', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Randal</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/27/mcclellan-on-the-defensive-bushs-public-and-private-iraq-statements-were-fully-consistent/comment-page-3/#comment-487887</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Randal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 11:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/27/mcclellan-on-the-defensive-bushs-public-and-private-iraq-statements-were-fully-consistent/#comment-487887</guid>
		<description>Bush&#039;s statements have all been consistent LIES! So in a way Scotty Boy is telling the truth about Dubya &gt; he never stops lying about Iraq, so that is consistent &gt; lol.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bush&#8217;s statements have all been consistent LIES! So in a way Scotty Boy is telling the truth about Dubya &gt; he never stops lying about Iraq, so that is consistent &gt; lol.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=487887', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GURU</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/27/mcclellan-on-the-defensive-bushs-public-and-private-iraq-statements-were-fully-consistent/comment-page-3/#comment-487870</link>
		<dc:creator>GURU</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 07:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/27/mcclellan-on-the-defensive-bushs-public-and-private-iraq-statements-were-fully-consistent/#comment-487870</guid>
		<description>Has anyone heard from SpudgeBoy today?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anyone heard from SpudgeBoy today?<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=487870', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lora</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/27/mcclellan-on-the-defensive-bushs-public-and-private-iraq-statements-were-fully-consistent/comment-page-3/#comment-487867</link>
		<dc:creator>Lora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 07:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/27/mcclellan-on-the-defensive-bushs-public-and-private-iraq-statements-were-fully-consistent/#comment-487867</guid>
		<description>Lora
#109 Thanks for the extra info on Japanese capital punishment, was unaware that their minors are under 20, not under 18 

Comment by squegeeboo 

To squegeeboo,
You&#039;re welcome.  Because of the great number of orphans produced by WWII, the Japanese penal system has been very lenient towards juvenile deliquents.  Until a few years ago, there weren&#039;t even any set punishments for murderers under 16.  The age for being sent to reformatories has since been lowered to 14, but that still doesn&#039;t cover 12-year old killers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lora<br />
#109 Thanks for the extra info on Japanese capital punishment, was unaware that their minors are under 20, not under 18 </p>
<p>Comment by squegeeboo </p>
<p>To squegeeboo,<br />
You&#8217;re welcome.  Because of the great number of orphans produced by WWII, the Japanese penal system has been very lenient towards juvenile deliquents.  Until a few years ago, there weren&#8217;t even any set punishments for murderers under 16.  The age for being sent to reformatories has since been lowered to 14, but that still doesn&#8217;t cover 12-year old killers.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=487867', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregor Samsa</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/27/mcclellan-on-the-defensive-bushs-public-and-private-iraq-statements-were-fully-consistent/comment-page-3/#comment-487848</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregor Samsa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 05:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/27/mcclellan-on-the-defensive-bushs-public-and-private-iraq-statements-were-fully-consistent/#comment-487848</guid>
		<description>Squegeeboo, 

Just because it makes my skin crawl when I hear people talk about democracy vs republic: 

A republic is a form of democracy -other types of democracy include: Constitutional monarchy (Spain, UK, etc.), and parliamentary democracy (Italy, Canada, India).

The US is a representative democracy aka republic: 

&lt;i&gt;Representative democracy is a political system where the people vote on government members, who are then expected to make decisions in accordance with the interests of their voters. It is called representative because the people do not vote on government decisions directly, but elect representatives to decide for them. This form of government has been increasingly common in recent times, and the number of representative democracies experienced such explosive growth during the 20th century that the majority of the world&#039;s population now lives under representative democratic regimes (which are sometimes also referred to as &quot;republics&quot;). &lt;/i&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democracy&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Wikipedia: Democracy&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;i&gt;The United States is a constitutional republic, with a government composed of and operating through a set of limited powers imposed by its design and enumerated in the United States Constitution. Specifically, the nation operates as a presidential democracy.&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Wikipedia: United States of America&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Squegeeboo, </p>
<p>Just because it makes my skin crawl when I hear people talk about democracy vs republic: </p>
<p>A republic is a form of democracy -other types of democracy include: Constitutional monarchy (Spain, UK, etc.), and parliamentary democracy (Italy, Canada, India).</p>
<p>The US is a representative democracy aka republic: </p>
<p><i>Representative democracy is a political system where the people vote on government members, who are then expected to make decisions in accordance with the interests of their voters. It is called representative because the people do not vote on government decisions directly, but elect representatives to decide for them. This form of government has been increasingly common in recent times, and the number of representative democracies experienced such explosive growth during the 20th century that the majority of the world&#8217;s population now lives under representative democratic regimes (which are sometimes also referred to as &#8220;republics&#8221;). </i><br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democracy" rel="nofollow">Wikipedia: Democracy</a></p>
<p><i>The United States is a constitutional republic, with a government composed of and operating through a set of limited powers imposed by its design and enumerated in the United States Constitution. Specifically, the nation operates as a presidential democracy.</i><br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States" rel="nofollow">Wikipedia: United States of America</a><a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=487848', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: squegeeboo</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/27/mcclellan-on-the-defensive-bushs-public-and-private-iraq-statements-were-fully-consistent/comment-page-3/#comment-487846</link>
		<dc:creator>squegeeboo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 05:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/27/mcclellan-on-the-defensive-bushs-public-and-private-iraq-statements-were-fully-consistent/#comment-487846</guid>
		<description>#112 Until the 17 amendment Senators were appointed by the states to serve.  After 1913 Senators became directly elected, but were still supposed to represent State interests, as opposed to general population interests.  Senators represent states, Congressmen represent the general population, that was how the founders set it up.  It was part of the original federalism inherent in the founding of the United States.

Anyways, goodnight, I look forward to anouther full day of Ryan insulting me tomorow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#112 Until the 17 amendment Senators were appointed by the states to serve.  After 1913 Senators became directly elected, but were still supposed to represent State interests, as opposed to general population interests.  Senators represent states, Congressmen represent the general population, that was how the founders set it up.  It was part of the original federalism inherent in the founding of the United States.</p>
<p>Anyways, goodnight, I look forward to anouther full day of Ryan insulting me tomorow.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=487846', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregor Samsa</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/27/mcclellan-on-the-defensive-bushs-public-and-private-iraq-statements-were-fully-consistent/comment-page-3/#comment-487843</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregor Samsa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 05:03:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/27/mcclellan-on-the-defensive-bushs-public-and-private-iraq-statements-were-fully-consistent/#comment-487843</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;we donâ€™t vote on the president, the electoral college does, and as far as I know, there are no states that force the college to vote the will of the population,
Comment by squegeeboo â€” March 27, 2006 @ 8:59 pm &lt;/i&gt;

Yes, that&#039;s why the USA is an indirect democracy...

&lt;i&gt;technically, the senate is supposed to represent our states, not the population. &lt;/i&gt;

This sentence makes no sense. Your senator represents your state, but not its people? Further, the people of each state elects their senators -again, the very definition of a democracy.

&lt;i&gt;So that leaves the House as democratically elected representing the people, while the rest, Supreme Court, Pres, Senate are either not elected by popular vote, or are not representing us.&lt;/i&gt;

Senators are elected by the people of their state to serve six year terms. 

Again, &quot;periodically free-held elections&quot; -the very definition of a democracy. 

You didn&#039;t know that you can cast a vote for your senator every six years? What state do you live in, anyway?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>we donâ€™t vote on the president, the electoral college does, and as far as I know, there are no states that force the college to vote the will of the population,<br />
Comment by squegeeboo â€” March 27, 2006 @ 8:59 pm </i></p>
<p>Yes, that&#8217;s why the USA is an indirect democracy&#8230;</p>
<p><i>technically, the senate is supposed to represent our states, not the population. </i></p>
<p>This sentence makes no sense. Your senator represents your state, but not its people? Further, the people of each state elects their senators -again, the very definition of a democracy.</p>
<p><i>So that leaves the House as democratically elected representing the people, while the rest, Supreme Court, Pres, Senate are either not elected by popular vote, or are not representing us.</i></p>
<p>Senators are elected by the people of their state to serve six year terms. </p>
<p>Again, &#8220;periodically free-held elections&#8221; -the very definition of a democracy. </p>
<p>You didn&#8217;t know that you can cast a vote for your senator every six years? What state do you live in, anyway?<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=487843', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: squegeeboo</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/27/mcclellan-on-the-defensive-bushs-public-and-private-iraq-statements-were-fully-consistent/comment-page-3/#comment-487840</link>
		<dc:creator>squegeeboo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 05:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/27/mcclellan-on-the-defensive-bushs-public-and-private-iraq-statements-were-fully-consistent/#comment-487840</guid>
		<description>Ryan
#101 Way to link to nothing relevant to what I was talking about

#102 Like I said, the electoral college votes for the president.  The electoral college does not have to follow the popular vote, and in several cases thru out our nations history they have not.  This means that your vote might not matter, depending on who is in the electoral college.  The Electoral College, the way the president is elected, is why Gore lost, and it has happened a few other times in history also.  The supreme court sided with electoral law, as opposed to the popular vote beacuse we are a country of laws.

#103 I said either not elected popularly, or not representing us, the senate represents the states, not us.  There for the second half of the or applies, not the first half, funny thing about or&#039;s it means either A, B or both A and B, in this case it just meant B, way to not understand simple logic.

Wiscoduk
#104  It disgusts me that a president has the power to add little notes to a bill like that, no president should be able to, laws are made by congress, accepted/vetoed by the president, and that is how it should be, and no, until I googled it earlier this evening I had no idea what the PNAC was, however, from reading/posting on this site I now know.  Just because I&#039;m conservative (actually a &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republitarianism&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Neo-Libertarian&lt;/a&gt;) dosn&#039;t mean I follow Bush blindly.

Lora
#109  Thanks for the extra info on Japanese capital punishment, was unaware that their minors are under 20, not under 18</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan<br />
#101 Way to link to nothing relevant to what I was talking about</p>
<p>#102 Like I said, the electoral college votes for the president.  The electoral college does not have to follow the popular vote, and in several cases thru out our nations history they have not.  This means that your vote might not matter, depending on who is in the electoral college.  The Electoral College, the way the president is elected, is why Gore lost, and it has happened a few other times in history also.  The supreme court sided with electoral law, as opposed to the popular vote beacuse we are a country of laws.</p>
<p>#103 I said either not elected popularly, or not representing us, the senate represents the states, not us.  There for the second half of the or applies, not the first half, funny thing about or&#8217;s it means either A, B or both A and B, in this case it just meant B, way to not understand simple logic.</p>
<p>Wiscoduk<br />
#104  It disgusts me that a president has the power to add little notes to a bill like that, no president should be able to, laws are made by congress, accepted/vetoed by the president, and that is how it should be, and no, until I googled it earlier this evening I had no idea what the PNAC was, however, from reading/posting on this site I now know.  Just because I&#8217;m conservative (actually a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republitarianism" rel="nofollow">Neo-Libertarian</a>) dosn&#8217;t mean I follow Bush blindly.</p>
<p>Lora<br />
#109  Thanks for the extra info on Japanese capital punishment, was unaware that their minors are under 20, not under 18<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=487840', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BushTracker.net</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/27/mcclellan-on-the-defensive-bushs-public-and-private-iraq-statements-were-fully-consistent/comment-page-3/#comment-487838</link>
		<dc:creator>BushTracker.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 05:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/27/mcclellan-on-the-defensive-bushs-public-and-private-iraq-statements-were-fully-consistent/#comment-487838</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Another Smoking Gun?...&lt;/strong&gt;

The New York Times is reporting on yet another confidential British government memo that details a discussion at the White House between President Bush, Prime Minister Tony Blair and senior-level aides on January 31, 2003. In sum, the memo outlines......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Another Smoking Gun?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>The New York Times is reporting on yet another confidential British government memo that details a discussion at the White House between President Bush, Prime Minister Tony Blair and senior-level aides on January 31, 2003. In sum, the memo outlines&#8230;&#8230;<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=487838', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lora</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/27/mcclellan-on-the-defensive-bushs-public-and-private-iraq-statements-were-fully-consistent/comment-page-3/#comment-487828</link>
		<dc:creator>Lora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 04:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/27/mcclellan-on-the-defensive-bushs-public-and-private-iraq-statements-were-fully-consistent/#comment-487828</guid>
		<description>#92 Japan also has the death penalty.

Comment by squegeeboo 
 

To squeegeeboo,
It is true that Japan has the death penalty, however it is never used on juveniles, which used to mean under 20.  Nowadays some judges find a gray area between ages 18 and 20 and occasionally mete it out to particularly vicious killers in that age range.  The death penalty is also very seldom ordered for someone who has murdered just one person.  And don&#039;t take this as my passing judgment on Japan&#039;s practices; I am only stating the facts here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#92 Japan also has the death penalty.</p>
<p>Comment by squegeeboo </p>
<p>To squeegeeboo,<br />
It is true that Japan has the death penalty, however it is never used on juveniles, which used to mean under 20.  Nowadays some judges find a gray area between ages 18 and 20 and occasionally mete it out to particularly vicious killers in that age range.  The death penalty is also very seldom ordered for someone who has murdered just one person.  And don&#8217;t take this as my passing judgment on Japan&#8217;s practices; I am only stating the facts here.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=487828', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lora</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/27/mcclellan-on-the-defensive-bushs-public-and-private-iraq-statements-were-fully-consistent/comment-page-3/#comment-487823</link>
		<dc:creator>Lora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 04:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/27/mcclellan-on-the-defensive-bushs-public-and-private-iraq-statements-were-fully-consistent/#comment-487823</guid>
		<description>Lora- Iâ€™m starting to believe you are the type of idiot savant that reads every third or fourth word of a post. (Comprehension is NOT your strong suit.) I WAS NOT DISCUSSING THE BOMBINGS OF JAPANESE CITIES. THE CONTIGENCY PLAN was an alternative to using the atomic weapons which were ul;timately used. Your comments addâ€¦..surprisingly (!) nothing to the conversation. My discussing the â€œplanâ€ and â€œcontingency planâ€ is a explanation for the point/counter-point of the learned Faiz. 

Comment by mighty aphrodite 

Mighty Hypocrite,
Since you brought up Japan--a country whose history and culture I know much better than you--, I was merely adding another fact that may have also been taken into consideration when deciding whether to use the A-bomb or the contingency plan.  I really don&#039;t need someone with such a poor grasp of English and who tends to use the same little chestnuts in a futile attempt to make his/her points even after they&#039;ve already been disproven to question my intelligence.  And, by the way, you never did answer my question of whether you were involved in any petitions concerning Rwanda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lora- Iâ€™m starting to believe you are the type of idiot savant that reads every third or fourth word of a post. (Comprehension is NOT your strong suit.) I WAS NOT DISCUSSING THE BOMBINGS OF JAPANESE CITIES. THE CONTIGENCY PLAN was an alternative to using the atomic weapons which were ul;timately used. Your comments addâ€¦..surprisingly (!) nothing to the conversation. My discussing the â€œplanâ€ and â€œcontingency planâ€ is a explanation for the point/counter-point of the learned Faiz. </p>
<p>Comment by mighty aphrodite </p>
<p>Mighty Hypocrite,<br />
Since you brought up Japan&#8211;a country whose history and culture I know much better than you&#8211;, I was merely adding another fact that may have also been taken into consideration when deciding whether to use the A-bomb or the contingency plan.  I really don&#8217;t need someone with such a poor grasp of English and who tends to use the same little chestnuts in a futile attempt to make his/her points even after they&#8217;ve already been disproven to question my intelligence.  And, by the way, you never did answer my question of whether you were involved in any petitions concerning Rwanda.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=487823', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Yankee Liberal in Texas &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A real post?!</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/27/mcclellan-on-the-defensive-bushs-public-and-private-iraq-statements-were-fully-consistent/comment-page-3/#comment-487802</link>
		<dc:creator>A Yankee Liberal in Texas &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A real post?!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 03:19:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/27/mcclellan-on-the-defensive-bushs-public-and-private-iraq-statements-were-fully-consistent/#comment-487802</guid>
		<description>[...] Think Progress goes on to clarify Scott McClellan&#039;s claim that both Bush&#039;s public and private statements are consistant with one another. But transcripts and documents prove otherwise: &#160; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Think Progress goes on to clarify Scott McClellan&#39;s claim that both Bush&#39;s public and private statements are consistant with one another. But transcripts and documents prove otherwise: &nbsp; [...]<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=487802', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rMatey</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/27/mcclellan-on-the-defensive-bushs-public-and-private-iraq-statements-were-fully-consistent/comment-page-3/#comment-487792</link>
		<dc:creator>rMatey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 02:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/27/mcclellan-on-the-defensive-bushs-public-and-private-iraq-statements-were-fully-consistent/#comment-487792</guid>
		<description>But, but, but, they tried to kill Daddy!!!!!!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But, but, but, they tried to kill Daddy!!!!!!&#8221;<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=487792', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WiscoDuk</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/27/mcclellan-on-the-defensive-bushs-public-and-private-iraq-statements-were-fully-consistent/comment-page-3/#comment-487787</link>
		<dc:creator>WiscoDuk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 02:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/27/mcclellan-on-the-defensive-bushs-public-and-private-iraq-statements-were-fully-consistent/#comment-487787</guid>
		<description>Oh- In case you missed it.

http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2006/03/24/bush_shuns_patriot_act_requirement/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh- In case you missed it.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2006/03/24/bush_shuns_patriot_act_requirement/" rel="nofollow">http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2006/03/24/bush_shuns_patriot_act_requirement/</a><a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=487787', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WiscoDuk</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/27/mcclellan-on-the-defensive-bushs-public-and-private-iraq-statements-were-fully-consistent/comment-page-3/#comment-487781</link>
		<dc:creator>WiscoDuk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 02:23:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/27/mcclellan-on-the-defensive-bushs-public-and-private-iraq-statements-were-fully-consistent/#comment-487781</guid>
		<description>Ah- I see squegee playin&#039; the antagonist again. Ryan- small taters for you.  

Quick question squegee. What is your opinion of Bush&#039;s under-publicized &quot;signing statement&quot; after the official signing of the Patriot Act? No time for a waste of time debate. Just curious what your thoughts are.

P.S. â€“ Did you really not know what the PNAC was?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah- I see squegee playin&#8217; the antagonist again. Ryan- small taters for you.  </p>
<p>Quick question squegee. What is your opinion of Bush&#8217;s under-publicized &#8220;signing statement&#8221; after the official signing of the Patriot Act? No time for a waste of time debate. Just curious what your thoughts are.</p>
<p>P.S. â€“ Did you really not know what the PNAC was?<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=487781', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Neat</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/27/mcclellan-on-the-defensive-bushs-public-and-private-iraq-statements-were-fully-consistent/comment-page-3/#comment-487774</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Neat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 02:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/27/mcclellan-on-the-defensive-bushs-public-and-private-iraq-statements-were-fully-consistent/#comment-487774</guid>
		<description>&quot;So that leaves the House as democratically elected representing the people, while the rest, Supreme Court, Pres, Senate are either not elected by popular vote, or are not representing us. Comment by squishypoop&quot;

The senate isn&#039;t elected by popular vote?  Are you utterly retarded?  When you get old enough to get on the internet without parental supervision - then consider coming back moron.  Right now, you&#039;re just wasting everyone&#039;s time with your stupidity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;So that leaves the House as democratically elected representing the people, while the rest, Supreme Court, Pres, Senate are either not elected by popular vote, or are not representing us. Comment by squishypoop&#8221;</p>
<p>The senate isn&#8217;t elected by popular vote?  Are you utterly retarded?  When you get old enough to get on the internet without parental supervision &#8211; then consider coming back moron.  Right now, you&#8217;re just wasting everyone&#8217;s time with your stupidity.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=487774', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Neat</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/27/mcclellan-on-the-defensive-bushs-public-and-private-iraq-statements-were-fully-consistent/comment-page-3/#comment-487773</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Neat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 02:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/27/mcclellan-on-the-defensive-bushs-public-and-private-iraq-statements-were-fully-consistent/#comment-487773</guid>
		<description>&quot;#96 we donâ€™t vote on the president, the electoral college does, and as far as I know, there are no states that force the college to vote the will of the population, although that might have changed after Gore lost, and technically, the senate is supposed to represent our states, not the population. squeegepoop&quot;

Were you always this stupid, or did you have to work at it.

When I vote, I don&#039;t cast a vote for an &#039;electoral college&#039;, I vote on the CANDIDATE.  The electoral college is just a &#039;check&#039; in the system that permits the government to re-shuffle the votes based on &#039;state boundaries&#039; regarding HOW those votes get counted.  But a claim that you don&#039;t vote on the president is utterly retarded!

And gore didn&#039;t lose, the supreme court gave bush the victory.  Gore wone the popular vote nationally and in florida - but the republicans interfered with that vote and the natural processes around it.

MORON.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;#96 we donâ€™t vote on the president, the electoral college does, and as far as I know, there are no states that force the college to vote the will of the population, although that might have changed after Gore lost, and technically, the senate is supposed to represent our states, not the population. squeegepoop&#8221;</p>
<p>Were you always this stupid, or did you have to work at it.</p>
<p>When I vote, I don&#8217;t cast a vote for an &#8216;electoral college&#8217;, I vote on the CANDIDATE.  The electoral college is just a &#8216;check&#8217; in the system that permits the government to re-shuffle the votes based on &#8217;state boundaries&#8217; regarding HOW those votes get counted.  But a claim that you don&#8217;t vote on the president is utterly retarded!</p>
<p>And gore didn&#8217;t lose, the supreme court gave bush the victory.  Gore wone the popular vote nationally and in florida &#8211; but the republicans interfered with that vote and the natural processes around it.</p>
<p>MORON.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=487773', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
