Comments on: Powerline blog weighs in on DeLay:

By: ReidBlog

ReidBlog — Wed, 05 Apr 2006 15:17:18 +0000

DeLayed!…

John Hinderaker continues to show signs of Kool-Aid intoxication……

By: Rosencrantz

Rosencrantz — Wed, 05 Apr 2006 14:39:42 +0000

It’s official now. The right is so out of touch with reality that they label anything they don’t like as being liberal. A Republican Politician could advocate for the death of all the middle east, the destruction of the government and democracy as we know it, end all laws dealing with equality, create the ultimate Big Brother state to spy on Americans for their own “protection”….and he’d still be labeled liberal if he didn’t fall into party line when it comes to another tax cut that only benefits the wealthiest %1.

The right has turned “liberal” from a dirty word akin to “communist” into a whiny little childs excuse for all their problems.

By: walter66

walter66 — Wed, 05 Apr 2006 12:54:21 +0000

what exactly did DeLay do to get himself labeled a
“liberal” ?

By: Xbot

Xbot — Wed, 05 Apr 2006 12:38:15 +0000

Even IF Captain Dumbass (AKA DeLay) is convicted of such crimes, he won’t end up in prison – he’s repubby, remember? He’ll end up in a resort for a number of weeks.

I hate rich people. Seriously.

By: GURU

GURU — Wed, 05 Apr 2006 05:39:01 +0000

Religion and state;good idea Tom.It’s a wonder Jefferson didn’t think of that.Pass the Vitalis.

By: Matthew J. Price

Matthew J. Price — Wed, 05 Apr 2006 05:37:33 +0000

Someday, my fellow Southerners will start voting Democrat again. It’s already starting to happen here in Alabama.

By: Toes

Toes — Wed, 05 Apr 2006 02:40:07 +0000

I lived in Georgia in 2002 when the Bush White House and Ralph Reed slimed an American hero, Max Cleland. I will NEVER forget or forgive what was done to Senator Max.

I’ll show you some politics of personal destruction, you slimy bastards.

By: the fly-man

the fly-man — Wed, 05 Apr 2006 01:21:55 +0000

It’s all about the moniker Conservative, not liberal. Tom Delay speaks for conservatives, well why did the National Review call for his dismissal? Conservativism has crossed the bridge they have long feared, principles are of whos domain? It’s the Church of churches. The faithful are all that matter. The vehicle of the greatest boogeyman ever, communism, is front and center the mo for the GOP, LOYALITY. The brazen delivery of denial is as corrupt as it is caustically indifferent. To dupe an electorate, so giving in dollars and in loyality, by the sheer gesture of ineptness, is the definition of contempt. If the best came together as it could have why are PARTY members going to jail?. The GOP has really proven to be the party of smaller government, the part we control.

By: Evil Spaniard

Evil Spaniard — Wed, 05 Apr 2006 01:21:26 +0000

Well, DeLay is a liberal. He constantly gives welfare to Republican organizations. And asks nothing in return…

By: Wisco

Wisco — Wed, 05 Apr 2006 01:16:22 +0000

Man, talk about pointing 180o away from the truth! It’s one thing to be delusional – it’s an illness. It’s another to be willfully delusional. There’s no way anyone – the author included – could possibly believe those words.

–
Griper Blade – grumblings from the heartland

By: Curlew

Curlew — Wed, 05 Apr 2006 01:15:07 +0000

If “bug boy” DeLay is “liberal” then Bush has an IQ greater than a gnats. Both are impossible to have happen.

By: Alex

Alex — Wed, 05 Apr 2006 01:05:52 +0000

I bit liberal? This guy is really a paradoy of himself.

Bathrooms
Rockets

By: Clyde the Ripper

Clyde the Ripper — Wed, 05 Apr 2006 00:46:22 +0000

It is obvious the Repugs need to contract with Bosch and Lomb for a whole bunch of contact lenses adapted for navel wear. Any one who cannot see any “…evidence of that (Delay’s illegal activities) in the public domain…” is suffering from such a rectal-cranial insertion that they may have lost their depth perception forever. That it what happens when reality is ignored and one relies on blind–repeat blind–faith.

By: ElectricBassPlayer

ElectricBassPlayer — Wed, 05 Apr 2006 00:45:47 +0000

(PS: I was referring to the Powerline statement, of course)

By: ElectricBassPlayer

ElectricBassPlayer — Wed, 05 Apr 2006 00:44:31 +0000

HAHA, it was obviously intended to be provocative, but it’s just pathetically stupid.

The combined brainpower of the right wing couldn’t power my refrigerator light.

By: Solitaire

Solitaire — Wed, 05 Apr 2006 00:30:08 +0000

Sorry for the rant.
Too much coffee.

By: Solitaire

Solitaire — Wed, 05 Apr 2006 00:28:16 +0000

Reliable conservative, huh? That’s really starting to sound like an oxymoron. Unless, of course, these BushCo people aren’t really conservative, as more and more formerly extremely quiet “conservatives” are saying with more frequency, more volume. Maybe. Or maybe it’s time for them to re-align. They may find themselves more successful than if they dare to confront those who have already successfully redefined “conservative.” That horsie has long left the barn. If the “reliable conservative” would please stand up? Please?

By: pete

pete — Wed, 05 Apr 2006 00:08:39 +0000

Washington corrupts. A taste of the trough and even the most reliable conservative will go all cuddly on you.

By: Solitaire

Solitaire — Wed, 05 Apr 2006 00:02:46 +0000

The problem I had with Tom DeLay from the start was that he put loyalty to the Republican party over loyalty to the country’s Constitution and Bill of Rights. If you find yourself at the other end of his hammer, that becomes crystal clear quickly.
The seed of this scandal is firmly planted in K Street. I think we should rip it out by the roots or risk losing the Union. And an environment conducive to life. Freedom.

By: mparker

mparker — Wed, 05 Apr 2006 00:02:41 +0000

DeLay was minding his own business drinking jeebus blood from from a chalice when Bill Clinton snuck up behind him and slipped in a liberal dose.

Poor defensless “hot tub” Tom. He will certainly be Sainted for all his suffering.

WEEEP WEEEP WEEEEEEEEEEEP WEEEEEEEEEEEEEEP!