<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Michelle Malkin Unhinged</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/05/michelle-malkin-unhinged/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/05/michelle-malkin-unhinged/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 07:23:51 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Redleg</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/05/michelle-malkin-unhinged/comment-page-4/#comment-499467</link>
		<dc:creator>Redleg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2006 19:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/05/michelle-malkin-unhinged/#comment-499467</guid>
		<description>Mighty Asswipey,
Are you suggesting that we should first have to prove Bush guilty in a court of law before we throw him overboard?  Due process is what you want?

I agree- I just wish you would provide the same Consitutionally guaranteed courtesy to Democratic politicians you accuse of breaking the law.  I like how some of you Rethugs have one set of rules for your own and another set for Dems.

&quot;Oh, but lawyers disagree over whether Bush actually violated the statute.&quot;  Fine, let&#039;s have a legitimate legal proceeding to find out instead of a fucking whitewash by the judiciary committee.  You folks don&#039;t even want to find out whether Bush broke the law or whether he intentionally lied to us about Iraq.  At the same time you accuse us of not throwing our own Democratic officials overboard over some imagined crime.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mighty Asswipey,<br />
Are you suggesting that we should first have to prove Bush guilty in a court of law before we throw him overboard?  Due process is what you want?</p>
<p>I agree- I just wish you would provide the same Consitutionally guaranteed courtesy to Democratic politicians you accuse of breaking the law.  I like how some of you Rethugs have one set of rules for your own and another set for Dems.</p>
<p>&#8220;Oh, but lawyers disagree over whether Bush actually violated the statute.&#8221;  Fine, let&#8217;s have a legitimate legal proceeding to find out instead of a fucking whitewash by the judiciary committee.  You folks don&#8217;t even want to find out whether Bush broke the law or whether he intentionally lied to us about Iraq.  At the same time you accuse us of not throwing our own Democratic officials overboard over some imagined crime.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=499467', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Butler</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/05/michelle-malkin-unhinged/comment-page-4/#comment-499076</link>
		<dc:creator>Butler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2006 15:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/05/michelle-malkin-unhinged/#comment-499076</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s up NAZIs! Looks like you are at your hatemongering again! Go for it losers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s up NAZIs! Looks like you are at your hatemongering again! Go for it losers!<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=499076', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: who4ted</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/05/michelle-malkin-unhinged/comment-page-3/#comment-498589</link>
		<dc:creator>who4ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2006 02:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/05/michelle-malkin-unhinged/#comment-498589</guid>
		<description>McKinney needs to put her name on her big ass right next to the &quot;Double Wide Coming Thru.&quot; sign.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McKinney needs to put her name on her big ass right next to the &#8220;Double Wide Coming Thru.&#8221; sign.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=498589', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: taters</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/05/michelle-malkin-unhinged/comment-page-3/#comment-498438</link>
		<dc:creator>taters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2006 00:03:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/05/michelle-malkin-unhinged/#comment-498438</guid>
		<description>In 1976, Reagan sought the Republican nomination against the incumbent President Gerald Ford. Reagan&#039;s campaign was on the ropes until the primaries hit the Southern states, where he won his first key victory in North Carolina. Throughout the South that spring and summer, Reagan portrayed himself as Goldwater&#039;s heir while criticizing Ford as a captive of Eastern establishment Republicans fixated on forced integration.

Reagan lost the nomination to Ford in 1976. But when the former California governor ran for the presidency again in 1980, he began his campaign with a controversial appearance in Philadelphia, Miss., where three civil rights workers had been brutally killed. It was at that sore spot on the racial map that Reagan revived talk about states&#039; rights and curbing the power of the federal government.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Conscience of a conservative?

Ronald Reagan was key to the South&#039;s transition to Republican politics. Goldwater got the ball rolling, but Reagan was at his side from the very beginning.â€
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The Civil Rights Act, signed July 2, 1964, by President Lyndon Johnson, ended legal discrimination against blacks at hotels, restaurants and department stores. It also made discrimination illegal in hiring. Barry Goldwater, the Republican presidential nominee that year, decided to make himself a voice for opponents of the Act.

&lt;strong&gt;Goldwater said he supported the white Southern position on civil rights, which was that each and every state had a sovereign right to control its laws. The Arizona Republican argued that each American has the right to decide whom to hire, whom to do business with and whom to welcome in his or her restaurant. The senator was right at home with Southern politicians who called the Civil Rights Act an attack on &quot;the Southern way of life.&quot;&lt;/strong&gt;

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=1953700&amp;columnId=1929301</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 1976, Reagan sought the Republican nomination against the incumbent President Gerald Ford. Reagan&#8217;s campaign was on the ropes until the primaries hit the Southern states, where he won his first key victory in North Carolina. Throughout the South that spring and summer, Reagan portrayed himself as Goldwater&#8217;s heir while criticizing Ford as a captive of Eastern establishment Republicans fixated on forced integration.</p>
<p>Reagan lost the nomination to Ford in 1976. But when the former California governor ran for the presidency again in 1980, he began his campaign with a controversial appearance in Philadelphia, Miss., where three civil rights workers had been brutally killed. It was at that sore spot on the racial map that Reagan revived talk about states&#8217; rights and curbing the power of the federal government.<br />
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~<br />
Conscience of a conservative?</p>
<p>Ronald Reagan was key to the South&#8217;s transition to Republican politics. Goldwater got the ball rolling, but Reagan was at his side from the very beginning.â€<br />
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~<br />
The Civil Rights Act, signed July 2, 1964, by President Lyndon Johnson, ended legal discrimination against blacks at hotels, restaurants and department stores. It also made discrimination illegal in hiring. Barry Goldwater, the Republican presidential nominee that year, decided to make himself a voice for opponents of the Act.</p>
<p><strong>Goldwater said he supported the white Southern position on civil rights, which was that each and every state had a sovereign right to control its laws. The Arizona Republican argued that each American has the right to decide whom to hire, whom to do business with and whom to welcome in his or her restaurant. The senator was right at home with Southern politicians who called the Civil Rights Act an attack on &#8220;the Southern way of life.&#8221;</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=1953700&amp;columnId=1929301" rel="nofollow">http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=1953700&amp;columnId=1929301</a><a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=498438', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: taters</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/05/michelle-malkin-unhinged/comment-page-3/#comment-498428</link>
		<dc:creator>taters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 23:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/05/michelle-malkin-unhinged/#comment-498428</guid>
		<description>It was called &quot;the southern strategy,&quot; started under Richard M. Nixon in 1968, and described Republican efforts to use race as a wedge issue -- on matters such as desegregation and busing -- to appeal to white southern voters.

Ken Mehlman, the Republican National Committee chairman, this morning will tell the NAACP national convention in Milwaukee that it was &quot;wrong.&quot;

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/07/13/AR2005071302342.html

This is actually really light - but its the first time these racist Tory/Loyalists copped to it.
Forty plus years later, of course</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was called &#8220;the southern strategy,&#8221; started under Richard M. Nixon in 1968, and described Republican efforts to use race as a wedge issue &#8212; on matters such as desegregation and busing &#8212; to appeal to white southern voters.</p>
<p>Ken Mehlman, the Republican National Committee chairman, this morning will tell the NAACP national convention in Milwaukee that it was &#8220;wrong.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/07/13/AR2005071302342.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/07/13/AR2005071302342.html</a></p>
<p>This is actually really light &#8211; but its the first time these racist Tory/Loyalists copped to it.<br />
Forty plus years later, of course<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=498428', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: taters</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/05/michelle-malkin-unhinged/comment-page-3/#comment-498421</link>
		<dc:creator>taters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 23:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/05/michelle-malkin-unhinged/#comment-498421</guid>
		<description>Actually the droolin&#039; rabid right wing knuckle draggers like to shove around 69 year old women - like Marsha Rovai, a Nick Lampson supporter. Here&#039;s some pix.

http://www.brazosriver.com/april_6_nick_lampson_press_confe.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually the droolin&#8217; rabid right wing knuckle draggers like to shove around 69 year old women &#8211; like Marsha Rovai, a Nick Lampson supporter. Here&#8217;s some pix.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.brazosriver.com/april_6_nick_lampson_press_confe.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.brazosriver.com/april_6_nick_lampson_press_confe.htm</a><a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=498421', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mighty aphrodite</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/05/michelle-malkin-unhinged/comment-page-3/#comment-498369</link>
		<dc:creator>mighty aphrodite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 23:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/05/michelle-malkin-unhinged/#comment-498369</guid>
		<description>&quot;You usually throw them overboard? Are you trying to bullshit me? Letâ€™s see you throw Bush overboard for his crimes.&quot; - REDnose
****Dear Mr. REDnose - since a variety of legal experts view the actions of Bush variably (that means &quot;differently&quot;) - it would be PREMATURE to throw him overboard.   Silly me - this from a political perspective that views abortion as birth control (or a &quot;preemie&quot;), any criticism of a &quot;person of colour&quot; as &quot;racism&quot;. defends our enemies at the expense of our brave service members, etc. 

BTW, you don&#039;t see an &quot;R&quot; behind Ted the Swimmers name.  Pervert Repubs belong in jail or worse.  But those understanding progs seem to manage to explain away many Dem&#039;s legal or sexual behaviour..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;You usually throw them overboard? Are you trying to bullshit me? Letâ€™s see you throw Bush overboard for his crimes.&#8221; &#8211; REDnose<br />
****Dear Mr. REDnose &#8211; since a variety of legal experts view the actions of Bush variably (that means &#8220;differently&#8221;) &#8211; it would be PREMATURE to throw him overboard.   Silly me &#8211; this from a political perspective that views abortion as birth control (or a &#8220;preemie&#8221;), any criticism of a &#8220;person of colour&#8221; as &#8220;racism&#8221;. defends our enemies at the expense of our brave service members, etc. </p>
<p>BTW, you don&#8217;t see an &#8220;R&#8221; behind Ted the Swimmers name.  Pervert Repubs belong in jail or worse.  But those understanding progs seem to manage to explain away many Dem&#8217;s legal or sexual behaviour..<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=498369', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: unbelievable</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/05/michelle-malkin-unhinged/comment-page-3/#comment-498000</link>
		<dc:creator>unbelievable</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 19:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/05/michelle-malkin-unhinged/#comment-498000</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;WASHINGTON (CNN)&lt;/strong&gt; -- Rep. Cynthia McKinney apologized on the House floor Thursday for a confrontation with a Capitol Police officer last week.

&quot;There should not have been any physical contact in this incident,&quot; McKinney said.

&quot;I am sorry that this misunderstanding happened at all, and I regret its escalation and I apologize,&quot; she said surrounded by colleagues on the House floor.

She said she would vote for a resolution expressing support for the efforts of Capitol Police. 

McKinney&#039;s apology came as a District of Columbia grand jury began hearing testimony Thursday related to the confrontation, sources said.

A decision on whether the Georgia congresswoman will be charged could come as early as next week, federal law enforcement sources said. 

Senior congressional sources said that two House staff members -- Troy Phillips, an aide to Rep. Sam Farr, D-California, and Lisa Subrize, executive assistant to Rep. Thaddeus McCotter, R-Michigan -- have been subpoenaed to testify.

Legal sources familiar with the case said the investigation into the incident is continuing and that is it unclear what impact McKinney&#039;s apology will have.

Police say McKinney struck a Capitol Police officer last week when the officer did not recognize her as a member of Congress and tried to stop her from entering a House office building when she did not present identification.

McKinney accuses the officer of &quot;inappropriate touching&quot; and racial profiling in the incident.

James Myart, an attorney representing McKinney, said he wouldn&#039;t be surprised if his client were indicted.

&quot;Grand juries do what grand juries do,&quot; Myart said. &quot;However, I would think that they would recognize that there simply is not enough evidence here to even bring an indictment.&quot; 

Members of the Congressional Black Caucus, which has declined to comment because the facts of the case are in dispute, met Wednesday evening to discuss the incident. McKinney was in attendance. 

Also Wednesday, McKinney deflected questions about the confrontation, while the Capitol Police chief said the lawmaker should have known better. 

Capitol Police Chief Terrance Gainer said McKinney didn&#039;t stop at an officer&#039;s request, then turned around and hit him after he grabbed her when she passed a security checkpoint.

&quot;Any time an officer does not know who the person is coming in the building, I direct them to stop that person. And even if you&#039;re stopped, you&#039;re not supposed to hit a police officer. It&#039;s very simple,&quot; he said. &quot;Even the high and the haughty should be able to stop and say, &#039;I&#039;m a congressman,&#039; and then everybody moves on.&quot;

http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/04/06/mckinney/index.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>WASHINGTON (CNN)</strong> &#8212; Rep. Cynthia McKinney apologized on the House floor Thursday for a confrontation with a Capitol Police officer last week.</p>
<p>&#8220;There should not have been any physical contact in this incident,&#8221; McKinney said.</p>
<p>&#8220;I am sorry that this misunderstanding happened at all, and I regret its escalation and I apologize,&#8221; she said surrounded by colleagues on the House floor.</p>
<p>She said she would vote for a resolution expressing support for the efforts of Capitol Police. </p>
<p>McKinney&#8217;s apology came as a District of Columbia grand jury began hearing testimony Thursday related to the confrontation, sources said.</p>
<p>A decision on whether the Georgia congresswoman will be charged could come as early as next week, federal law enforcement sources said. </p>
<p>Senior congressional sources said that two House staff members &#8212; Troy Phillips, an aide to Rep. Sam Farr, D-California, and Lisa Subrize, executive assistant to Rep. Thaddeus McCotter, R-Michigan &#8212; have been subpoenaed to testify.</p>
<p>Legal sources familiar with the case said the investigation into the incident is continuing and that is it unclear what impact McKinney&#8217;s apology will have.</p>
<p>Police say McKinney struck a Capitol Police officer last week when the officer did not recognize her as a member of Congress and tried to stop her from entering a House office building when she did not present identification.</p>
<p>McKinney accuses the officer of &#8220;inappropriate touching&#8221; and racial profiling in the incident.</p>
<p>James Myart, an attorney representing McKinney, said he wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if his client were indicted.</p>
<p>&#8220;Grand juries do what grand juries do,&#8221; Myart said. &#8220;However, I would think that they would recognize that there simply is not enough evidence here to even bring an indictment.&#8221; </p>
<p>Members of the Congressional Black Caucus, which has declined to comment because the facts of the case are in dispute, met Wednesday evening to discuss the incident. McKinney was in attendance. </p>
<p>Also Wednesday, McKinney deflected questions about the confrontation, while the Capitol Police chief said the lawmaker should have known better. </p>
<p>Capitol Police Chief Terrance Gainer said McKinney didn&#8217;t stop at an officer&#8217;s request, then turned around and hit him after he grabbed her when she passed a security checkpoint.</p>
<p>&#8220;Any time an officer does not know who the person is coming in the building, I direct them to stop that person. And even if you&#8217;re stopped, you&#8217;re not supposed to hit a police officer. It&#8217;s very simple,&#8221; he said. &#8220;Even the high and the haughty should be able to stop and say, &#8216;I&#8217;m a congressman,&#8217; and then everybody moves on.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/04/06/mckinney/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/04/06/mckinney/index.html</a><a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=498000', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Redleg</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/05/michelle-malkin-unhinged/comment-page-3/#comment-497955</link>
		<dc:creator>Redleg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 19:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/05/michelle-malkin-unhinged/#comment-497955</guid>
		<description>Mighty Chowderhead,
You usually throw them overboard?  Are you trying to bullshit me?  Let&#039;s see you throw Bush overboard for his crimes.  Hell, you&#039;d have to get rid of half of the GOP in Congress if you wanted to get rid of the shitheads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mighty Chowderhead,<br />
You usually throw them overboard?  Are you trying to bullshit me?  Let&#8217;s see you throw Bush overboard for his crimes.  Hell, you&#8217;d have to get rid of half of the GOP in Congress if you wanted to get rid of the shitheads.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=497955', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Redleg</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/05/michelle-malkin-unhinged/comment-page-3/#comment-497946</link>
		<dc:creator>Redleg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 19:32:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/05/michelle-malkin-unhinged/#comment-497946</guid>
		<description>IRI and Mighty Nitwhit
Did you read anywhere that I defended McKinney&#039;s behavior?  No you fucking didn&#039;t.  I made a point about IRI&#039;s &quot;Buckwheat&quot; comment.  Don&#039;t try to change the subject, you racist fuckwads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IRI and Mighty Nitwhit<br />
Did you read anywhere that I defended McKinney&#8217;s behavior?  No you fucking didn&#8217;t.  I made a point about IRI&#8217;s &#8220;Buckwheat&#8221; comment.  Don&#8217;t try to change the subject, you racist fuckwads.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=497946', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mighty aphrodite</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/05/michelle-malkin-unhinged/comment-page-3/#comment-497943</link>
		<dc:creator>mighty aphrodite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 19:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/05/michelle-malkin-unhinged/#comment-497943</guid>
		<description>P.S. REDleg - Some Repubs commit crimes - the difference is - we usually throw them overboard after we see the evidence that they are the pieces of $h*t they demonstrate themselves to be.  Dems have another word for it &quot;Kennedyesque&quot;...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P.S. REDleg &#8211; Some Repubs commit crimes &#8211; the difference is &#8211; we usually throw them overboard after we see the evidence that they are the pieces of $h*t they demonstrate themselves to be.  Dems have another word for it &#8220;Kennedyesque&#8221;&#8230;<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=497943', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I-RIGHT-I</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/05/michelle-malkin-unhinged/comment-page-3/#comment-497928</link>
		<dc:creator>I-RIGHT-I</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 19:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/05/michelle-malkin-unhinged/#comment-497928</guid>
		<description>IRI,
Your â€œBuckwheatâ€ comment demonstrates how racially insensitive you are.

Comment by Redleg

&lt;b&gt;Racially insensitive indeed. The woman&#039;s new do makes her look like Buckwheat. If anything I was being kind to the race whore and Marxist brillowheadedtumblefuck..&lt;/b&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IRI,<br />
Your â€œBuckwheatâ€ comment demonstrates how racially insensitive you are.</p>
<p>Comment by Redleg</p>
<p><b>Racially insensitive indeed. The woman&#8217;s new do makes her look like Buckwheat. If anything I was being kind to the race whore and Marxist brillowheadedtumblefuck..</b><a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=497928', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mighty aphrodite</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/05/michelle-malkin-unhinged/comment-page-3/#comment-497920</link>
		<dc:creator>mighty aphrodite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 19:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/05/michelle-malkin-unhinged/#comment-497920</guid>
		<description>#141 - &quot;Your â€œBuckwheatâ€ comment demonstrates how racially insensitive you are. And you are wrong- the Rethugs donâ€™t police their own lawbreakers any better than the cops do.&quot; - REDleg

*****OK, explain Ms. McKinney&#039;s lack of religious sensitivities - she&#039;s one of the most notorious anti-Semites in the Congress today.  And the &quot;racism&quot; component isn&#039;t flying this time, Cynthia.  You look completely different with the new &#039;do. I can&#039;t decide which I like better - the prim, school marm look, or the &quot;windswept, I didn&#039;t have time to run a pick through my tresses&quot; look....
I RARELY agree with Nancy Pelosi or Steny Hoyer, but when those two turn on a Dem, that Dem screwed up (as Dick Cheney would say) &quot;big time&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#141 &#8211; &#8220;Your â€œBuckwheatâ€ comment demonstrates how racially insensitive you are. And you are wrong- the Rethugs donâ€™t police their own lawbreakers any better than the cops do.&#8221; &#8211; REDleg</p>
<p>*****OK, explain Ms. McKinney&#8217;s lack of religious sensitivities &#8211; she&#8217;s one of the most notorious anti-Semites in the Congress today.  And the &#8220;racism&#8221; component isn&#8217;t flying this time, Cynthia.  You look completely different with the new &#8216;do. I can&#8217;t decide which I like better &#8211; the prim, school marm look, or the &#8220;windswept, I didn&#8217;t have time to run a pick through my tresses&#8221; look&#8230;.<br />
I RARELY agree with Nancy Pelosi or Steny Hoyer, but when those two turn on a Dem, that Dem screwed up (as Dick Cheney would say) &#8220;big time&#8221;.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=497920', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Redleg</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/05/michelle-malkin-unhinged/comment-page-3/#comment-497838</link>
		<dc:creator>Redleg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 18:38:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/05/michelle-malkin-unhinged/#comment-497838</guid>
		<description>IRI,
Your &quot;Buckwheat&quot; comment demonstrates how racially insensitive you are.  And you are wrong- the Rethugs don&#039;t police their own lawbreakers any better than the cops do.  For crying out loud- look at the level of corruption oozing out of the GOP.  I&#039;ll bet most of the fuckers will still get the support of their pig-ignorant constituents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IRI,<br />
Your &#8220;Buckwheat&#8221; comment demonstrates how racially insensitive you are.  And you are wrong- the Rethugs don&#8217;t police their own lawbreakers any better than the cops do.  For crying out loud- look at the level of corruption oozing out of the GOP.  I&#8217;ll bet most of the fuckers will still get the support of their pig-ignorant constituents.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=497838', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Redleg</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/05/michelle-malkin-unhinged/comment-page-3/#comment-497827</link>
		<dc:creator>Redleg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 18:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/05/michelle-malkin-unhinged/#comment-497827</guid>
		<description>IRI,
Your &quot;Buckwheat&quot; comment is out of bounds.  And you are wrong.  Bush has committed numerous crimes and yet he remains in office.  You idiots don&#039;t police your own any better than the police do.  Jeebus- look at the level of fucking corruption oozing out of the GOP.  Most of those fuckers will remain in office, and their pig ignorant supporters will continue to vote for them and defend them.  Wake up, moron.  Your party has crapped on ethical conduct and the rule of law.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IRI,<br />
Your &#8220;Buckwheat&#8221; comment is out of bounds.  And you are wrong.  Bush has committed numerous crimes and yet he remains in office.  You idiots don&#8217;t police your own any better than the police do.  Jeebus- look at the level of fucking corruption oozing out of the GOP.  Most of those fuckers will remain in office, and their pig ignorant supporters will continue to vote for them and defend them.  Wake up, moron.  Your party has crapped on ethical conduct and the rule of law.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=497827', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I-RIGHT-I</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/05/michelle-malkin-unhinged/comment-page-3/#comment-497784</link>
		<dc:creator>I-RIGHT-I</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 18:08:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/05/michelle-malkin-unhinged/#comment-497784</guid>
		<description>Iâ€™m not defending McKinney just because sheâ€™s a Democrat and I donâ€™t have enough liberal guilt to give her a pass just because of her melanin content and neither should anyone else. 

Comment by ron powell 

&quot;Buckwheat&quot; McKinney is a race whore and a Marxist fuckwit. The fact that she&#039;s female and black is just icing on the cake so there&#039;s nothing to feel guilty about if you happen to be a Liberal. You have no option BUT to defend her. If she were a republican and pulled that stunt we&#039;d have her out of office the next election but not before the Liberals demanded that she be prosecuted for attempted murder of a police officer. Tell me I&#039;m wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Iâ€™m not defending McKinney just because sheâ€™s a Democrat and I donâ€™t have enough liberal guilt to give her a pass just because of her melanin content and neither should anyone else. </p>
<p>Comment by ron powell </p>
<p>&#8220;Buckwheat&#8221; McKinney is a race whore and a Marxist fuckwit. The fact that she&#8217;s female and black is just icing on the cake so there&#8217;s nothing to feel guilty about if you happen to be a Liberal. You have no option BUT to defend her. If she were a republican and pulled that stunt we&#8217;d have her out of office the next election but not before the Liberals demanded that she be prosecuted for attempted murder of a police officer. Tell me I&#8217;m wrong.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=497784', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ron powell</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/05/michelle-malkin-unhinged/comment-page-3/#comment-497746</link>
		<dc:creator>ron powell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 17:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/05/michelle-malkin-unhinged/#comment-497746</guid>
		<description>I have a friend, who was a liberal Democrat congressman who served six terms in the House with Cynthia McKinney. He usually agreed with her on most issues but described her as a bit unhinged (my words, not his.) Of course, Delay deserves his own ring of hell in Dante&#039;s Inferno, but that&#039;s another story. As for me, I&#039;m not defending McKinney just because she&#039;s a Democrat and I don&#039;t have enough liberal guilt to give her a pass just because of her melanin content and neither should anyone else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a friend, who was a liberal Democrat congressman who served six terms in the House with Cynthia McKinney. He usually agreed with her on most issues but described her as a bit unhinged (my words, not his.) Of course, Delay deserves his own ring of hell in Dante&#8217;s Inferno, but that&#8217;s another story. As for me, I&#8217;m not defending McKinney just because she&#8217;s a Democrat and I don&#8217;t have enough liberal guilt to give her a pass just because of her melanin content and neither should anyone else.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=497746', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jason</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/05/michelle-malkin-unhinged/comment-page-3/#comment-497173</link>
		<dc:creator>jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 02:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/05/michelle-malkin-unhinged/#comment-497173</guid>
		<description>wwallace aka Culture of Disruption
why do you hate America?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wwallace aka Culture of Disruption<br />
why do you hate America?<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=497173', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WaltTheMan</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/05/michelle-malkin-unhinged/comment-page-3/#comment-497171</link>
		<dc:creator>WaltTheMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 02:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/05/michelle-malkin-unhinged/#comment-497171</guid>
		<description>Can&#039;t they simply have the Secret Service come in and waste the asaulting officer? Keystone Kops Inc.. In the suburbs, they go for donuts and burgers - in DC they go for the bourbon (and lots of it!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t they simply have the Secret Service come in and waste the asaulting officer? Keystone Kops Inc.. In the suburbs, they go for donuts and burgers &#8211; in DC they go for the bourbon (and lots of it!)<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=497171', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Muse</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/05/michelle-malkin-unhinged/comment-page-3/#comment-497156</link>
		<dc:creator>The Muse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 01:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/05/michelle-malkin-unhinged/#comment-497156</guid>
		<description>Please, Malkin wouldn&#039;t know a fact if it bit her on the nose. 

That said, I&#039;ve had it with McKinney v. Cop.  Time for a parody.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eyewitnessmuse.com/musings.php?p=207&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;McKinney Trial Moved to The Hague&lt;/a&gt;


EWM- (April 5, 2006) Succumbing to the reality that the U.S. legal system is not up to the task of handling the â€œtrial of the century,â€ officials announced today that the cop-beating trial of Rep. Cynthia McKinney will be reclassified as a war crime and moved to The Hague. 

McKinney is accused of striking a Capitol Hill police officer who accosted her for bypassing a security checkpoint in the Longworth House Office Building. McKinney, a black woman, says it was a case of â€œracial profiling.â€ The burley cop, who was not injured, says his â€œfeelings were hurt.â€ A tourist who witnessed the incident says, â€œChrist on a cross, can these morons just get over it?â€...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please, Malkin wouldn&#8217;t know a fact if it bit her on the nose. </p>
<p>That said, I&#8217;ve had it with McKinney v. Cop.  Time for a parody.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.eyewitnessmuse.com/musings.php?p=207" rel="nofollow">McKinney Trial Moved to The Hague</a></p>
<p>EWM- (April 5, 2006) Succumbing to the reality that the U.S. legal system is not up to the task of handling the â€œtrial of the century,â€ officials announced today that the cop-beating trial of Rep. Cynthia McKinney will be reclassified as a war crime and moved to The Hague. </p>
<p>McKinney is accused of striking a Capitol Hill police officer who accosted her for bypassing a security checkpoint in the Longworth House Office Building. McKinney, a black woman, says it was a case of â€œracial profiling.â€ The burley cop, who was not injured, says his â€œfeelings were hurt.â€ A tourist who witnessed the incident says, â€œChrist on a cross, can these morons just get over it?â€&#8230;<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=497156', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
