Report: Blair refuses to back Iran strike.
By on Apr 16th, 2006 at 9:53 am
Report: Blair refuses to back Iran strike.
“Tony Blair has told George Bush that Britain cannot offer military support to any strike on Iran, regardless of whether the move wins the backing of the international community,” the Scotsman reports. Last week, it was found that in July 2004, “British officers took part in a US war game aimed at preparing for a possible invasion of Iran.”
View Most Popular
Advertisement
What We're About
What We're Fighting For
What We're Fighting Against
Featured
Subscribe to the Progress Report
Topic CloudView topics sorted by popularity
Afghanistan
Bachmann
Beck
Boehner
Business
Civil Rights
Congress
Corporate Ethics
Dobbs
Economy
Education
Election
Energy
Environment
Ethics
Fox News
Gingrich
Global Warming
Health Care
Hoffman
Immigration
International Relations
Iraq
Justice
LGBT
Lieberman
Limbaugh
Media
Military
O'Reilly
Obama
Palin
Pelosi
Politics
Race
Radical Right
Religion
Sports
Steele
Stimulus
Tea Parties
Tea Party
Terrorism
Veterans
Women's Rights
Visit Our Affiliated Sites
Reports
In-depth studies on select topics
Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.
ArchivesBlog Roll
For your inspiration and delight!
An Easter Story Diary At Kos
Enjoy
April 16th, 2006 at 10:12 amWhat? Bushes’ poodle does n’t want to be his Ass Boy Bitch anymore?
April 16th, 2006 at 10:20 amNice one Tone. I’ve been visiting alot of Republican sites, and they really can’t wait to launch a few bombs. They clearly get off on conflict.
April 16th, 2006 at 10:23 amAt least Tony learns once burnt twice shy, even though our prime minister Tony Blair is already a mass murderer
April 16th, 2006 at 10:32 amBen, could you list some of those sites here. I haven’t looked in on any and would like to see and maybe add some left sided coments to them….Thank’s…..Blessings
April 16th, 2006 at 10:36 amSharon – http://www.hannity.com/forum/
Try reading one topic about Iran without bursting into laughter.
April 16th, 2006 at 10:43 amSimple question:
April 16th, 2006 at 11:11 amWhy would Bush need Blair’s permission to drop the bomb?
#7 SLAB
April 16th, 2006 at 11:27 amYou make a good point. GW is a lone cowboy. This is Dr. Strangelove’s government, using George Orwell’s story lines. The only thing wrong with George Bush as Slim Picken’s character, riding the rocket to oblivion is that the whole world will explode along with him.
Looks like Tony Blair finally found his balls.
April 16th, 2006 at 11:37 amTony Blair was sick of a chafed ass caused by the repeated slapping motion of Bush’s ball-sac.
Blair finally realized that he doesn’t have any military left to fight Bush’s vanity wars.
A day late and a pound short old chap.
-GSD
April 16th, 2006 at 11:53 amTony Blair says “fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice…ah..ah..ah.. you can’t fool me again”.
April 16th, 2006 at 12:06 pmBlair is already relatively unpopular. He is not yet ready to hand over PM to Gordon Brown and it is unlikely he would like to be remembered as a warmongerer. In addition, the UK can do little to help the US in any real sense besides perhaps their AWACS. They do not have the stealth bombers that are likely to be prominent.
That’s assuming that the US only envisions an air campaign…
Blair wants to be remembered for his massive spending on NHS (which has produced mixed results) among other social programs. He doesn’t need to go out like this and he doesn’t want to alienate his party any more than he already has.
April 16th, 2006 at 12:11 pmWHO NEEDS THEM? AS IF THEY HELPED IN IRAQ. HAH! HAVING BRITAIN AS AN ALLY IS ALL FOR SHOW.
#8 MARIE IS TYPICAL OF THE HENNY PENNY PACIFIST CROWD, AND THEIR KNEEJERK REACTION FORECASTING WW3 . WHAT WILL HAPPEN IS THAT IRANS NUCLEAR CAPABILITIES WILL BE SURGICALLY REMOVED, AND IRANS ARMY DESTROYED, AND WW3 WONT HAPPEN.
I KNOW WHEN WW3 DOESNT HAPPEN, EVERYBODY WHO READS THINKPROGRESS WILL BE SAD. YOUVE ALL GOT YOURE HOPES UP THAT THE NEXT TIME BUSH ORDERS A BOMBING IT WILL BE THE END OF THE WORLD.
TRY TO THINK POSITIVE. WE WILL GET RID OF IRAN, AND AFTER OIL PRICES COMEBACK DOWN, YOU WILL THANK BUSH FOR MAKING THE WORLDS MOST IMPORTANT OIL REGION SAFE.
THE ALTERNATIVE IS TO LET IRAN MAKE BOMBS, THREATEN ISREAL, AND 3-5 YEARS LATER START A HUGE WAR IN THE MID EAST. A WAR WHICH AMERICA WILL HAVE TO SORT OUT. A WAR WHICH WILL CAUSE OIL PRICES TO GO UP 10 TIMES THE PRESENT LEVEL.
IM JUST BEING PRATMATIC. DO YOU WANT THE WAR NOW OR IN 3 YEARS WHEN IRAN HAS THE BOMB? ITS GOING TO HAPPEN. LETS ROLL UP OUR SLEEVES AND TAKE CARE OF BUSINESS.
April 16th, 2006 at 12:20 pm#6 Ben – I couldn’t help but laugh when I read some of the topics. These folks are true nutcases. The funniest part is when they state “I heard on Fox News ……” As if Fox News is real news. When god was handing out brains, these folks said “no thank, I won’t be needing any brains”.
April 16th, 2006 at 12:22 pmDear anvilhead,
Actually, I will be VERY VERY HAPPY if Bush doesn’t start WWIII. I have no death wish. As far as Isreal is concerned, I’m getting very tired of my tax dollars going to support Isreal, and I’m getting tired of having that little piece of s**t of a country dictating US policies. And Isreal has nukes and would be the first to use them in the middle east. If we go into Iran, $3.00/gallon for gas will look like the “good old days” because gas will go up to $10.00/gallon and China has an agreement to purchase Iran’s oil and China will not be happy with the US interrupting their oil supply.
You are a pinhead – not an anvilhead.
April 16th, 2006 at 12:29 pmIM JUST BEING PRATMATIC. DO YOU WANT THE WAR NOW OR IN 3 YEARS WHEN IRAN HAS THE BOMB? ITS GOING TO HAPPEN. LETS ROLL UP OUR SLEEVES AND TAKE CARE OF BUSINESS.
Comment by anvilhead
And that is the only two options your poor little mind can come up with?
April 16th, 2006 at 12:33 pmSo, you are signing up to go fight?
Good, now if we can get 500,000 more of you chickenhawks to sign up for duty, we can pull off what you predict.
April 16th, 2006 at 12:38 pmTo the citizens of the United States of America,
In the light of your failure to elect a suitable President of the USA and thus to govern yourselves, we hereby give notice of the revocation of your independence, effective today. Her Sovereign Majesty Queen Elizabeth II will resume monarchical duties over all states, commonwealths and other territories. Except Utah, which she does not fancy. Your new prime minister (The Right Honourable Tony Blair, MP for the 97.85% of you who have until now been unaware that there is a world outside your borders) will appoint a minister for America without the need for further elections. Congress and the Senate will be disbanded.
A questionnaire will be circulated next year to determine whether any of you noticed. To aid in the transition to a British Crown Dependency, the following rules are introduced with immediate effect:
1. You should look up revocation in the Oxford English Dictionary. Then look up aluminium. Check the pronunciation guide. You will be amazed at just how wrongly you have been pronouncing it. The letter U will be reinstated in words such as favour and neighbour; skipping the letter U is nothing more than laziness on your part. Likewise, you will learn to spell doughnut without skipping half the letters. You will end your love affair with the letter Z (pronounced zed not zee) and the suffix ize will be replaced by the suffix ise. You will learn that the suffix burgh is pronounced burra (e.g. Edinburgh). You are welcome to respell Pittsburgh as Pittsberg if you can’t cope with correct pronunciation. Generally, you should raise your vocabulary to acceptable levels. Look up vocabulary. Using the same twenty seven words interspersed with filler noises such as like and you know is an unacceptable and inefficient form of communication. Look up interspersed. There will be no more bleeps in the Jerry Springer show. If you’re not old enough to cope with bad language, then you shouldn’t have chat shows. When you learn to develop your vocabulary then you won’t have to use bad language as often.
2. There is no such thing as US English. We will let Microsoft know on your behalf. The Microsoft spell-checker will be adjusted to take account of the reinstated letter u and the elimination of -ize.
3. You should learn to distinguish between the English and Australian accents. It really isn’t that hard. English accents are not limited to Cockney, upper-class twit, or Mancunian (Daphne in Frasier). You will also have to learn how to understand regional accents – Scottish dramas such as Taggart will no longer be broadcast with subtitles. While we’re talking about regions, you must learn that there is no such place as Devonshire in England. The name of the county is Devon. If you persist in calling it Devonshire, all American States will become shires (e.g. Texasshire, Floridashire, Louisianashire).
4. Hollywood will be required to occasionally cast English actors as the good guys. Hollywood will be required to cast English actors to play English characters. British sit-coms such as Men Behaving Badly or Red Dwarf will not be re-cast and watered down for a wishy-washy American audience who can’t cope with the humour of occasional political incorrectness.
5. You should relearn your original national anthem, God Save The Queen, but only after fully carrying out task 1. We would not want you to get confused and give up half way through.
6. You should stop playing American football. There is only one kind of football. What you refer to as American football is not a very good game. The 2.15% of you who are aware that there is a world outside your borders may have noticed that no one else plays American football. You will no longer be allowed to play it, and should instead play proper football. Initially, it would be best if you played with the girls. It is a difficult game. Those of you brave enough will, in time, be allowed to play rugby (which is similar to American football but does not involve stopping for a rest every twenty seconds or wearing full Kevlar body armour like nancies). We are hoping to get together at least a US rugby sevens side by 2005. You should stop playing baseball. It is not reasonable to host an event called the World Series for a game which is not played outside of America. Since only 2.15% of you are aware that there is a world beyond your borders, your error is understandable. Instead of baseball, you will be allowed to play a girls game called Rounders which is baseball without fancy team strip, oversized gloves, collector cards or hotdogs.
7. You should declare war on Quebec and France, using nuclear weapons if they give you any merde. (Merde is French for Shit.) The 97.85% of you who were not aware that there is a world outside your borders should count yourselves lucky. The Russians have never been the bad guys. You will no longer be allowed to own or carry guns. You will no longer be allowed to own or carry anything more dangerous in public than a vegetable peeler. Because we don’t believe you are sensible enough to handle potentially dangerous items, you will require a permit if you wish to carry a vegetable peeler in public.
8. July 4th is no longer a public holiday. November 2 nd will be a new national holiday, but only in England. It will be called Indecisive Day.
9. All American cars are hereby banned. They are crap and it is for your own good. When we show you German cars, you will understand what we mean. All road intersections will be replaced with roundabouts. You will start driving on the left with immediate effect. At the same time, you will go metric with immediate effect and without the benefit of conversion tables. Roundabouts and metrication will help you understand the British sense of humour.
10. You will learn to make real chips. Those things you call French fries are not real chips. Fries aren’t even French, they are Belgian though 97.85% of you (including the guy who discovered fries while in Europe) are not aware of a country called Belgium. Those things you insist on calling potato chips are properly called crisps. Real chips are thick cut and fried in animal fat. The traditional accompaniment to chips is beer, which should be served warm and flat. Waitresses will be trained to be more aggressive with customers.
11. As a sign of penance, 5 grams of sea salt per cup will be added to all tea made within the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, this quantity to be doubled for tea made within the city of Boston itself.
12. The cold tasteless stuff you insist on calling beer is not actually beer at all, it is lager. From November 1st, only proper British Bitter will be referred to as beer, and European brews of known and accepted provenance will be referred to as Lager. The substances formerly known as American Beer will henceforth be referred to as Near-Frozen Gnat’s Urine, with the exception of the product of the American Budweiser Company, whose product will be referred to as Weak Near-Frozen Gnat’s Urine. This will allow true Budweiser (as manufactured for the last 1000 years in Pilsen, Czech Republic) to be sold without risk of confusion.
13. From December 1st, the UK will harmonise petrol (or Gasoline, as you will be permitted to keep calling it until April 1st, 2005) prices with the former USA. The UK will harmonise its prices to those of the former USA and the former USA will, in return, adopt UK petrol prices (roughly $6/US gallon – get used to it).
14. You will learn to resolve personal issues without using guns, lawyers, or therapists. The fact that you need so many lawyers and therapists shows that you’re not adult enough to be independent. Guns should be handled only by adults. If you’re not adult enough to sort things out without suing someone or speaking to a therapist, then you’re not grown up enough to handle a gun.
15. Please tell us who killed JFK. It’s been driving us crazy.
Tax collectors from Her Majesty’s Government will be with you shortly to ensure the acquisition of all revenues due (backdated to 1776).
Thank you for your cooperation.
~Writer unknown. Might be John Cleese.
April 16th, 2006 at 12:38 pmBruce Gorton – very funny post.
April 16th, 2006 at 12:53 pmBlair’s distancing himself because he knows that if Bubble Boy attacks Iran retaliation is a given.
Blair don’t want his country getting obliterated.
We on the other hand have a pychopath running things so retaliation is the furthest thing from his diseased mind.
Hail to the Pyschopath!
April 16th, 2006 at 12:56 pmAnvilhead=Pinhead, I agree.
April 16th, 2006 at 12:59 pmThe real question is: What do we now call English muffins?
April 16th, 2006 at 1:01 pmHey! Off topic but kinda related….
Now that the majority of our military leaders agree that Bubble Boy and Rummy are pyschopaths, a military coupe could be on the horizon.
Support U.S. troops if and when they overthrow the United States Govt
Overthrough the Government!.
April 16th, 2006 at 1:14 pmI think it’s reaching a bit to call military war games as anything more than learning troop capabilities. Saying it is preparing them for an invasion of Iran just seems a little like stretching. If blair did say he wasn’t going that’s good news though, perhaps help to reign in old Bushie there though.
13 THE ALTERNATIVE IS TO LET IRAN MAKE BOMBS, THREATEN ISREAL, AND 3-5 YEARS LATER START A HUGE WAR IN THE MID EAST.
I think Israel can pretty much handle it, if the U.S/U.N quits handcuffing them. They have shown the ability. Why not just let them do it? The international community won’t protect them. But they also know the U.S/Britian/Germany and Japan won’t do anything against them if they do take out Iran.
18 Funny :)
23 Now that the majority of our military leaders agree that Bubble Boy and Rummy are pyschopaths, a military coupe could be on the horizon.
I doubt it, and where did you get a majority of military leaders said that? I have read a few polls that show a dislike or a feeling of lack of confidence. I didn’t read one that said psychopath though.
April 16th, 2006 at 1:37 pmGood, now if we can get 500,000 more of you chickenhawks to sign up for duty, we can pull off what you predict.
Comment by Spudge_Boy — April 16, 2006 @ 12:38 pm
WHY AM I A CHICKEN HAWK? DO YOU CALL SOLDIERS FIGHTING IN THE IRAQ WAR WHO ARE AGAINST THE WAR WARKHAWKS? IT IS POSSIBLE TO HAVE AN OPINION WITHOUT BEING IN THE MILITARY. WE HAVE AN ALL VOL. ARMY. WE SHOULD HAVE DRAFT. SERVE ONE YEAR AND YOURE DONE SERVING. IF CALLED ID GO. BUT IM 30 SO ITS NOT LIKELY.
WE HAVE AN ALL VOL. ARMY. WE DONT NEED 500,000 MEN TO OCCUPY IRAN. WE ARE NOT GOING TO OCCUPY IRAN. WE ARE GOING TO DE-MILITARIZE THEM WITH OUR AIR FORCE AND NAVY.
IM ACUSED OF NOT BEING ABLE TO IMAGINE ANY POSSIBILITY OTHER THAN BOMBING IRAN NOW. WHERES YOUR IMAGINATION. CANT YOU IMAGINE A TIME DOWN THE ROAD 3-5 YEARS WHERE THIS SPECULATION ABOUT WAR WITH IRAN IS REPEATED BECAUSE THEY ARE SABER RATTLING AGAIN, THIS TIME WITH NUCLEAR BOMBS? TRY
April 16th, 2006 at 1:58 pmAmerica has not got the guts to have a conventional war with Iran, 70 million people 60% aged 35 and under , mountainous terrain, decent army, navy and airforce with chemical weapons to use 40,000 terrorists ready to commit jehad on American targets
Americans are basically cowards who attack countries like iraq who had been bombed the shit out of before they even commit to attacking Iraq. Murdering cowards
You touch Iran and the rest of the world will hate you more than they do now, your all stuffed
Good old russia has 22,000 nukes more than america has with 5500 aimed to land in america at the blink of an eye
youll be the losers in an Iran war — Cowards — go on start the war I will laugh and celebrate at every american casualty –
Just like 911
April 16th, 2006 at 2:08 pmActually, the military upped the age to 42, so you could be drafted.
I think a draft would be a lot more fair. That way people who support the war in Iraq could go and enjoy the sites too. We wouldn’t just be propping up oil companies with our poor.
April 16th, 2006 at 2:16 pmit’s sad how much Tony Blair has fallen since he was aligned with the Chimp President. He was, for awhile a favorie among the British people when he and his party overwhelmed John Major and the Conservative party in 1996. He brought a lot of hope to England and helped to end the long war between England and the IRA. He and Clinton were the best of pals.
Then came 9/11 and after that, he made his deal with the devil and that devil’s name was Bush. With the Iraq debacle, Blair and his party, the British equivalent of the Democrats, were set to fall. George Michael even mocked him in a music video. Sean Connery publicly refused to back Blair. Blair should have known that if James Bond wasn’t going to back him, he would lose the country like LBJ did when Cronkite blasted him in ‘68 for a war that was unjust and unwarranted.
I think the downfall has to go back to the idea that Blair wanted to be more like an American politician. He has admitted to plagarizing a bit on one of Clinton’s campaign speeches. When Bush came along, that was the beginning of the end of England’s romance with Blair.
It’s nice to hear that Blair has seen the light, but it’s too late.
April 16th, 2006 at 2:35 pmSpudge,
It kind of surprises me that you would prefer a draft. I understand your point about it being fair, but I think the morale issues outweigh that for me. With all of the problems in a war zone (Prison guards etc) adding people forced to be there would just compound it.
April 16th, 2006 at 2:55 pmIs there any way to put a CAPSLOCK block on Knucklehead, I mean ANVILHEAD? I realize this response is feeding the troll, but are these pissheads really that desperate for attention?
April 16th, 2006 at 3:24 pmActually, If they DID enlist (or get drafted), they would get all the attention they desire (and more!)…
Or… if their precious Compounder-In-Grief (Monsieur Shrub) were indicted, tried and convicted, chuckleheads like poor-petite Anvil could be indicted as co-conspirators. Then, they could get all the attention they so crave (and obviously deserve) as being “Rocco’s biatch.” “You got a pretty mouth there, Anvilhead…”
It’s nice to hear that Blair has seen the light, but it’s too late.
Comment by JIMBO — April 16, 2006 @ 2:35 pm
I think Blair is just considering his own declining approval rating and is trying to save his career. At least he gets it. Bush never will.
April 16th, 2006 at 3:29 pmTundra,
The only reason it suprises you is because the right wingers that come here think that we are all left wingers here.
I don’t fit into any category. Take for instance the fact that I support the death penalty. Most true left wingers are 100% against the death penalty.
I served in the military and think everybody should spend a couple of years in the military. That ain’t left wing.
I am called a left winger because I hate George W. Bush, which is incorrect. There were a lot of things Clinton did that I didn’t like and I joined the military to fight under George H. W. Bush. My hatred for George W. Bush has nothing to do with left or right, it has to do with his incompetence.
Have a good Easter.
April 16th, 2006 at 5:59 pmSpudge,
Yeah I know you spent time, High Angle hell right?
It was because you spent time I was surprised. I don’t like the idea because of how slackers slow everthing down. Then again the personal responsibility is heavily toted in the service, would be a good thing to pass on.
Happy Easter and beware rabid bunnies!
April 16th, 2006 at 7:40 pmChilderen!Children!…
There will be no war against Iran. Simply because
1.US economy (along the rest of the world) could not afford oil price over $100/bbl. Iran is 2nd prodecude of the opec)
2.US could not affrod a utterly messed Iraq (way more than what it is now) due to Iran’s great influence on Shia population.
3. The world could not afford Perisan Gulf as vital oil path gets shut down.
April 16th, 2006 at 7:50 pmThat’s it.
Kadi
Strange that Blair would not join in on Iran even with International Community backing. He got into Iraq rather quickly. The rewards he thought would come his way or Englands did not eventuate so now he is a bit reluctant to join in.
April 16th, 2006 at 8:26 pmYes, I think the military is a great for building personal responsibility along with team work, courage and most importantly, honor.
Is the military for everybody, no. Some people just didn’t “get it” and were always getting treated like crap by the leaders and fellow soldiers. You know, guys that would never bathe.
But, overall, the military builds character. I think less people would be gung ho for war, if they knew that their buddy or relative might end up getting killed.
April 16th, 2006 at 8:36 pmIT’S TOO LATE.
BLAIR IS STUCK WITH BUSH. WHETHER BRITAIN TAKES PART IN BUSH’S NEXT WAR OR NOT IS IMMATERIAL. THE IRANIANS HAVE ALREADY STATED THAT BRITAIN WILL BE ATTACKED TOO.
MAYBE BRITAIN’S NEXT PRIME MINISTER WILL BE A LITTLE MORE CAREFUL ABOUT PICKING HIS FRIENDS.
April 16th, 2006 at 8:42 pm#29- Tundra, there are already people who are “forced” to be there. Those who have been “stop-lossed”, for example. And BushCo’s misuse of the National Guard. Using them in ways that were never intended, and causing them multiple hardships, which BushCo makes no attempts to alleviate. They do not even qualify for the same “benefits” as regular military, although they are all fighting the same battles. And they even got shafted on what little body armor was available, getting leftovers from Viet Nam! BushCo has a “gift” for compounding their mistakes, only exceeded by their defensiveness when called on their hideous record.
As for Tony Blair, he cannot hide from the people the way GWB does. He has no illusions about the response he would receive, should he attempt to support GWB’s Iran nonsense.
April 17th, 2006 at 3:34 am