<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shep Smith Embarrassed by O&#8217;Reilly&#8217;s &#8216;War on Easter&#8217;?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/16/shep-smith-embarrassed-by-oreillys-war-on-easter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/16/shep-smith-embarrassed-by-oreillys-war-on-easter/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 22:25:04 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gay Incest Gay Male Sex Gay Brothers</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/16/shep-smith-embarrassed-by-oreillys-war-on-easter/comment-page-2/#comment-4758982</link>
		<dc:creator>Gay Incest Gay Male Sex Gay Brothers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 00:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/16/shep-smith-embarrassed-by-oreillys-war-on-easter/#comment-4758982</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Gay Incest Gay Male Sex Gay Brothers&lt;/strong&gt;

I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Gay Incest Gay Male Sex Gay Brothers</strong></p>
<p>I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=4758982', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Think Progress &#187; John Gibson Hypes &#8216;A War on Easter&#8217;, Announces Easter Bunny Under Attack</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/16/shep-smith-embarrassed-by-oreillys-war-on-easter/comment-page-2/#comment-2053525</link>
		<dc:creator>Think Progress &#187; John Gibson Hypes &#8216;A War on Easter&#8217;, Announces Easter Bunny Under Attack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 00:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/16/shep-smith-embarrassed-by-oreillys-war-on-easter/#comment-2053525</guid>
		<description>[...] suggested the Easter bunny was &#8220;under attack.&#8221; After embarrassing himself and his colleagues, O&#8217;Reilly eventually acknowledged, &#8220;There is no attack on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] suggested the Easter bunny was &#8220;under attack.&#8221; After embarrassing himself and his colleagues, O&#8217;Reilly eventually acknowledged, &#8220;There is no attack on [...]<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=2053525', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick in SF</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/16/shep-smith-embarrassed-by-oreillys-war-on-easter/comment-page-2/#comment-509399</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick in SF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2006 02:49:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/16/shep-smith-embarrassed-by-oreillys-war-on-easter/#comment-509399</guid>
		<description>Maybe a &quot;tipping point&quot; has been reached.
Sorry, but the cliche was too much to resist. Like chocolate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe a &#8220;tipping point&#8221; has been reached.<br />
Sorry, but the cliche was too much to resist. Like chocolate.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=509399', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/16/shep-smith-embarrassed-by-oreillys-war-on-easter/comment-page-2/#comment-509218</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 22:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/16/shep-smith-embarrassed-by-oreillys-war-on-easter/#comment-509218</guid>
		<description>Ah, the delicious irony of Christian mythologists like &quot;I-Right-I&quot; accusing the Left of living in Fantasy Land.  Absolutely beautiful, &quot;I.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, the delicious irony of Christian mythologists like &#8220;I-Right-I&#8221; accusing the Left of living in Fantasy Land.  Absolutely beautiful, &#8220;I.&#8221;<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=509218', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bushit</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/16/shep-smith-embarrassed-by-oreillys-war-on-easter/comment-page-2/#comment-509096</link>
		<dc:creator>bushit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 20:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/16/shep-smith-embarrassed-by-oreillys-war-on-easter/#comment-509096</guid>
		<description>The same kind of loser that reads that crap and believes it is credible is the same kind of loser that says Bush=Hitler, No Blood for Oil and George new about 9-11.  Here dumbass, watch this….

http://luckydawgnews.com/911conspiracybs.html 
Comment by I-RIGHT-I — April 17, 2006 @

that video didn&#039;t prove anything, but http://www.911truestory.com/ do</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The same kind of loser that reads that crap and believes it is credible is the same kind of loser that says Bush=Hitler, No Blood for Oil and George new about 9-11.  Here dumbass, watch this….</p>
<p><a href="http://luckydawgnews.com/911conspiracybs.html" rel="nofollow">http://luckydawgnews.com/911conspiracybs.html</a><br />
Comment by I-RIGHT-I — April 17, 2006 @</p>
<p>that video didn&#8217;t prove anything, but <a href="http://www.911truestory.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.911truestory.com/</a> do<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=509096', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: unbelievable</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/16/shep-smith-embarrassed-by-oreillys-war-on-easter/comment-page-2/#comment-508945</link>
		<dc:creator>unbelievable</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 19:07:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/16/shep-smith-embarrassed-by-oreillys-war-on-easter/#comment-508945</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Um, the Neo-cons and Pres. Bush come to mind about a minority persecuting a majority. Also, the major bias in favor of the uber-rich over the middle class in America is another case in point.&lt;/em&gt;

He might have cheated in both elections, but he, along with his preferential treatment for wealth, was put into office by majorities (majority of Sureme Court votes, and majority of electoral college votes).  Those don&#039;t qualify as actual minorities as a result.  I&#039;m talking about defenseless minorities.  Those without power to equalize their numbers.  Guess I should have clarified.

&lt;em&gt;In this case, itâ€™s just silly to think that Christians are being persecuted because of their religion. When was the last time a Christian was denied a job in the US because of his/her religion? When was the last time you heard of a Christian being attacked/beaten/killed because of his/her religion?&lt;/em&gt;

Good point.  I agree.

&lt;em&gt;The so-called â€œwar on Christianityâ€ is nothing but a canard to help drive up the â€œreligiousâ€ vote this coming mid-term election. The Republicans are on the ropes, and are afraid theyâ€™ll lose majority status, and the only way to distract from the entrenched Republican corruption is for them to create a fake â€œwarâ€ to help their sagging polls. 

Comment by Democrat Soldier â€” April 17, 2006 @ 2:46 pm&lt;/em&gt; 

You&#039;re right - we tend to appease whiners.  People who have taken advantage of the liberal intention to help those who truly were persocuted or in need.  

In San Francisco, I noticed how the senior level managers were constantly complaining about ALL the work they had to do.  I&#039;m not a whiner, so as a serior designer, I was over worked, but didn&#039;t need to cry about it.  You wouldn&#039;t believe how those who kvetched were pitied, while those who didn&#039;t (me), would be given more and more work.  I eventually had to start bitching to get them to stop giving me everyone else&#039;s work.  Pathetic.  And it&#039;s become our culture.  Whine away...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Um, the Neo-cons and Pres. Bush come to mind about a minority persecuting a majority. Also, the major bias in favor of the uber-rich over the middle class in America is another case in point.</em></p>
<p>He might have cheated in both elections, but he, along with his preferential treatment for wealth, was put into office by majorities (majority of Sureme Court votes, and majority of electoral college votes).  Those don&#8217;t qualify as actual minorities as a result.  I&#8217;m talking about defenseless minorities.  Those without power to equalize their numbers.  Guess I should have clarified.</p>
<p><em>In this case, itâ€™s just silly to think that Christians are being persecuted because of their religion. When was the last time a Christian was denied a job in the US because of his/her religion? When was the last time you heard of a Christian being attacked/beaten/killed because of his/her religion?</em></p>
<p>Good point.  I agree.</p>
<p><em>The so-called â€œwar on Christianityâ€ is nothing but a canard to help drive up the â€œreligiousâ€ vote this coming mid-term election. The Republicans are on the ropes, and are afraid theyâ€™ll lose majority status, and the only way to distract from the entrenched Republican corruption is for them to create a fake â€œwarâ€ to help their sagging polls. </p>
<p>Comment by Democrat Soldier â€” April 17, 2006 @ 2:46 pm</em> </p>
<p>You&#8217;re right &#8211; we tend to appease whiners.  People who have taken advantage of the liberal intention to help those who truly were persocuted or in need.  </p>
<p>In San Francisco, I noticed how the senior level managers were constantly complaining about ALL the work they had to do.  I&#8217;m not a whiner, so as a serior designer, I was over worked, but didn&#8217;t need to cry about it.  You wouldn&#8217;t believe how those who kvetched were pitied, while those who didn&#8217;t (me), would be given more and more work.  I eventually had to start bitching to get them to stop giving me everyone else&#8217;s work.  Pathetic.  And it&#8217;s become our culture.  Whine away&#8230;<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=508945', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Democrat Soldier</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/16/shep-smith-embarrassed-by-oreillys-war-on-easter/comment-page-2/#comment-508907</link>
		<dc:creator>Democrat Soldier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 18:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/16/shep-smith-embarrassed-by-oreillys-war-on-easter/#comment-508907</guid>
		<description>#48 - &quot;Logically, a minority cannot persecute a majority.&quot;

Um, the Neo-cons and Pres. Bush come to mind about a minority persecuting a majority.  Also, the major bias in favor of the uber-rich over the middle class in America is another case in point.

In this case, it&#039;s just silly to think that Christians are being persecuted because of their religion.  When was the last time a Christian was denied a job in the US because of his/her religion?  When was the last time you heard of a Christian being attacked/beaten/killed because of his/her religion?

The so-called &quot;war on Christianity&quot; is nothing but a canard to help drive up the &quot;religious&quot; vote this coming mid-term election.  The Republicans are on the ropes, and are afraid they&#039;ll lose majority status, and the only way to distract from the entrenched Republican corruption is for them to create a fake &quot;war&quot; to help their sagging polls.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#48 &#8211; &#8220;Logically, a minority cannot persecute a majority.&#8221;</p>
<p>Um, the Neo-cons and Pres. Bush come to mind about a minority persecuting a majority.  Also, the major bias in favor of the uber-rich over the middle class in America is another case in point.</p>
<p>In this case, it&#8217;s just silly to think that Christians are being persecuted because of their religion.  When was the last time a Christian was denied a job in the US because of his/her religion?  When was the last time you heard of a Christian being attacked/beaten/killed because of his/her religion?</p>
<p>The so-called &#8220;war on Christianity&#8221; is nothing but a canard to help drive up the &#8220;religious&#8221; vote this coming mid-term election.  The Republicans are on the ropes, and are afraid they&#8217;ll lose majority status, and the only way to distract from the entrenched Republican corruption is for them to create a fake &#8220;war&#8221; to help their sagging polls.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=508907', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: true_conservative_2008</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/16/shep-smith-embarrassed-by-oreillys-war-on-easter/comment-page-1/#comment-508867</link>
		<dc:creator>true_conservative_2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 18:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/16/shep-smith-embarrassed-by-oreillys-war-on-easter/#comment-508867</guid>
		<description>Lay off the Bunny! 

Matthew 4

1Then Jesus was led by the Bunny into the desert to be tempted by the devil. 2After fasting forty days and forty nights, he was hungry. 3The tempter came to him and said, &quot;If you are the Son of God, tell these stones to become bread.&quot;

4Jesus answered, &quot;It is written: &#039;Man does not live on bread alone, but on every Bunny that comes from the loins of God.&#039;[a]&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lay off the Bunny! </p>
<p>Matthew 4</p>
<p>1Then Jesus was led by the Bunny into the desert to be tempted by the devil. 2After fasting forty days and forty nights, he was hungry. 3The tempter came to him and said, &#8220;If you are the Son of God, tell these stones to become bread.&#8221;</p>
<p>4Jesus answered, &#8220;It is written: &#8216;Man does not live on bread alone, but on every Bunny that comes from the loins of God.&#8217;[a]&#8220;<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=508867', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MATTHEW</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/16/shep-smith-embarrassed-by-oreillys-war-on-easter/comment-page-1/#comment-508853</link>
		<dc:creator>MATTHEW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 18:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/16/shep-smith-embarrassed-by-oreillys-war-on-easter/#comment-508853</guid>
		<description>Excuse me i-r-i,but the paralells between Bush and Hitler are frightening,blood should never be spilled for oil and Mr. Bush and his gang of criminals have an awful lot of holes to fill on the 9/11 issue and you should be over in Iraq kicking Iraqi butts instead of running your mouth on liberal blog sites since your such a Bush bootlicker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excuse me i-r-i,but the paralells between Bush and Hitler are frightening,blood should never be spilled for oil and Mr. Bush and his gang of criminals have an awful lot of holes to fill on the 9/11 issue and you should be over in Iraq kicking Iraqi butts instead of running your mouth on liberal blog sites since your such a Bush bootlicker.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=508853', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: unbelievable</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/16/shep-smith-embarrassed-by-oreillys-war-on-easter/comment-page-1/#comment-508844</link>
		<dc:creator>unbelievable</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 18:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/16/shep-smith-embarrassed-by-oreillys-war-on-easter/#comment-508844</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;I think it would be pretty fair to say that it would be extremely difficult to claim that atheists are persecuting Christians in this society, and not the other way around. But it goes much deeper than that.

Comment by Democrat Soldier â€” April 17, 2006 @ 1:13 pm &lt;/em&gt;

Logically, a minority cannot persecute a majority.  That is hysterical.  These eveangelicals are out of control.  Nobody wants to eliminate them.  Just get them to stop shoving their religion down our throats.  BIG difference!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>I think it would be pretty fair to say that it would be extremely difficult to claim that atheists are persecuting Christians in this society, and not the other way around. But it goes much deeper than that.</p>
<p>Comment by Democrat Soldier â€” April 17, 2006 @ 1:13 pm </em></p>
<p>Logically, a minority cannot persecute a majority.  That is hysterical.  These eveangelicals are out of control.  Nobody wants to eliminate them.  Just get them to stop shoving their religion down our throats.  BIG difference!<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=508844', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Democrat Soldier</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/16/shep-smith-embarrassed-by-oreillys-war-on-easter/comment-page-1/#comment-508777</link>
		<dc:creator>Democrat Soldier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 17:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/16/shep-smith-embarrassed-by-oreillys-war-on-easter/#comment-508777</guid>
		<description>#46 - Continuation:  http://www.blogd.com/archives/cat_religion.html

&quot;But the chief irony is not just that Christians think they are being persecuted when they&#039;re not. What&#039;s ironic is the fact that they are the ones doing the persecuting, and all too often, atheists and agnostics are the ones who are suffering. Think about it: could an atheist ever be elected President of the United States? Hell, no. In fact, it is an unspoken prerequisite that if you want to be president, you not only have to be a Christian, but a fairly mainstream one at that--Mormons need not apply, not in this day and age at least. Even if you are religious but don&#039;t attend church, that&#039;s still a big strike against you.

I think it would be pretty fair to say that it would be extremely difficult to claim that &lt;em&gt;atheists&lt;/em&gt; are persecuting &lt;strong&gt;Christians&lt;/strong&gt; in this society, and not the other way around. But it goes much deeper than that.

A recent study by the University of Minnesotaâ€™s department of sociology took a survey of 2000 American households and found that atheists were the most feared and distrusted. Almost half said that atheists are the least likely to &quot;agree with your vision of American society.&quot; Only 54% agreed that atheists shared their vision, as opposed to Muslims, who scored 64%, Recent immigrants and homosexuals scoring in the 70s, and whites and blacks scoring highest, in the 90s. (PDF file.) The study reported that atheists were considered (PDF) &quot;most dangerous or threatening.&quot; 

This rather strong discriminatory bias permeates society, besides just the presidency. It is commonly reported that the Boy Scouts exclude gays, but less reported is that atheists are also banned from the group. If a widely popular social organization started excluding Catholics or Methodists, there&#039;d be holy hell to pay; but apparently, excluding atheists is just fine.

Even more disturbing is a common trend, reported on by Andrew Sullivan among others, that child custody cases are being decided on the basis of the beliefs of the parents. Christian parents are being awarded custody over their atheist spouses, and atheists can even denied some visitation rights because of their beliefs.

The source of this information is a law article (PDF) written by Eugene Volokh, a Law professor at UCLA. Volokh reports on a large number of cases where a parent was denied custody--even in favor of the child&#039;s grandparents--because the parent was not sufficiently religious for the judge&#039;s tastes. Volokh also points out that half of Americans distrust atheists, but further notes that &quot;half the public thinks that itâ€™s &lt;em&gt;necessary&lt;/em&gt; &#039;to believe in God in order to be moral and have good values.&#039;&quot; [Emphasis Volokh&#039;s.] If you don&#039;t believe that, check out what this guy wrote. Apparently, a lot of people believe this, whether they&#039;ll admit it to you directly or not.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#46 &#8211; Continuation:  <a href="http://www.blogd.com/archives/cat_religion.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.blogd.com/archives/cat_religion.html</a></p>
<p>&#8220;But the chief irony is not just that Christians think they are being persecuted when they&#8217;re not. What&#8217;s ironic is the fact that they are the ones doing the persecuting, and all too often, atheists and agnostics are the ones who are suffering. Think about it: could an atheist ever be elected President of the United States? Hell, no. In fact, it is an unspoken prerequisite that if you want to be president, you not only have to be a Christian, but a fairly mainstream one at that&#8211;Mormons need not apply, not in this day and age at least. Even if you are religious but don&#8217;t attend church, that&#8217;s still a big strike against you.</p>
<p>I think it would be pretty fair to say that it would be extremely difficult to claim that <em>atheists</em> are persecuting <strong>Christians</strong> in this society, and not the other way around. But it goes much deeper than that.</p>
<p>A recent study by the University of Minnesotaâ€™s department of sociology took a survey of 2000 American households and found that atheists were the most feared and distrusted. Almost half said that atheists are the least likely to &#8220;agree with your vision of American society.&#8221; Only 54% agreed that atheists shared their vision, as opposed to Muslims, who scored 64%, Recent immigrants and homosexuals scoring in the 70s, and whites and blacks scoring highest, in the 90s. (PDF file.) The study reported that atheists were considered (PDF) &#8220;most dangerous or threatening.&#8221; </p>
<p>This rather strong discriminatory bias permeates society, besides just the presidency. It is commonly reported that the Boy Scouts exclude gays, but less reported is that atheists are also banned from the group. If a widely popular social organization started excluding Catholics or Methodists, there&#8217;d be holy hell to pay; but apparently, excluding atheists is just fine.</p>
<p>Even more disturbing is a common trend, reported on by Andrew Sullivan among others, that child custody cases are being decided on the basis of the beliefs of the parents. Christian parents are being awarded custody over their atheist spouses, and atheists can even denied some visitation rights because of their beliefs.</p>
<p>The source of this information is a law article (PDF) written by Eugene Volokh, a Law professor at UCLA. Volokh reports on a large number of cases where a parent was denied custody&#8211;even in favor of the child&#8217;s grandparents&#8211;because the parent was not sufficiently religious for the judge&#8217;s tastes. Volokh also points out that half of Americans distrust atheists, but further notes that &#8220;half the public thinks that itâ€™s <em>necessary</em> &#8216;to believe in God in order to be moral and have good values.&#8217;&#8221; [Emphasis Volokh's.] If you don&#8217;t believe that, check out what this guy wrote. Apparently, a lot of people believe this, whether they&#8217;ll admit it to you directly or not.&#8221;<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=508777', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Democrat Soldier</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/16/shep-smith-embarrassed-by-oreillys-war-on-easter/comment-page-1/#comment-508768</link>
		<dc:creator>Democrat Soldier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 17:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/16/shep-smith-embarrassed-by-oreillys-war-on-easter/#comment-508768</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The War is against Atheists, Not Christians&lt;/strong&gt;

http://www.blogd.com/archives/cat_religion.html

&quot;For the past several years, there has been an especially fervent strain of protest from the American Christian community, with the rather outlandish claim that Christians are being persecuted and warred upon. Utterly untrue, of course--at least 80% of the country is Christian, Christian symbols and terminology have been seeping into the government for a long time, and the country currently is run by a party which is overwhelmingly Christian-friendly.

The pinnacle of this paranoid delusion rose to absurd heights in a congregation held last weekend titled &quot;War on Christians and the Values Voters of 2006.&quot; At the event, Christians went on a breast-beating rampage, claiming they were under attack from all quarters, including liberals, Hollywood, the Internet, scientists, the court system, and even the Republican Party. Let me tell you, if you&#039;re a Christian and you believe that the Republican Party has declared &quot;war&quot; on you, then I&#039;m sorry--even the most paranoid schizophrenic sufferer would edge away from you like you were giving off dangerous levels of bozo rays.

The &quot;embattled&quot; Christians at the congress maintained that &quot;neo-pagans&quot; and secularists expressed &quot;Christophobia,&quot; in effect &quot;an irrational fear of anything Christ-based,&quot; asserting that there was &quot;a war on America, a war on God and a war on all believers.&quot;

As I have written before, this severely warped sense of persecution can be attributed to two chief causes. &lt;strong&gt;First, it may be a political strategy--paint yourself as oppressed, and people will give you more of what you want. Or second, it could be an earnest though completely wrong belief, stemming from the presumption that Christianity naturally deserves to be dominant instead of equal to other belief systems, and therefore any expression of equality of belief among Americans would be interpreted as an &quot;attack&quot; on Christians.&lt;/strong&gt;

Now, you might say that these are the loony fringe--after all, they did ask Tom DeLay to speak. But if they are a fringe, they are a successfully vocal one; you have heard their point of view far more often than you hear the other side. They get tons of sympathetic or at least respectful media coverage, and they make up the Republican base and as such receive far more attention and action in today&#039;s government than is proportional to their actual constituency.&quot;

There&#039;s more to this article, but it&#039;s a very interesting and truthful read.

Of course, the people that fall for the &quot;war on christians&quot; line will be unable to appreciate the logic and truth this article is based upon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The War is against Atheists, Not Christians</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.blogd.com/archives/cat_religion.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.blogd.com/archives/cat_religion.html</a></p>
<p>&#8220;For the past several years, there has been an especially fervent strain of protest from the American Christian community, with the rather outlandish claim that Christians are being persecuted and warred upon. Utterly untrue, of course&#8211;at least 80% of the country is Christian, Christian symbols and terminology have been seeping into the government for a long time, and the country currently is run by a party which is overwhelmingly Christian-friendly.</p>
<p>The pinnacle of this paranoid delusion rose to absurd heights in a congregation held last weekend titled &#8220;War on Christians and the Values Voters of 2006.&#8221; At the event, Christians went on a breast-beating rampage, claiming they were under attack from all quarters, including liberals, Hollywood, the Internet, scientists, the court system, and even the Republican Party. Let me tell you, if you&#8217;re a Christian and you believe that the Republican Party has declared &#8220;war&#8221; on you, then I&#8217;m sorry&#8211;even the most paranoid schizophrenic sufferer would edge away from you like you were giving off dangerous levels of bozo rays.</p>
<p>The &#8220;embattled&#8221; Christians at the congress maintained that &#8220;neo-pagans&#8221; and secularists expressed &#8220;Christophobia,&#8221; in effect &#8220;an irrational fear of anything Christ-based,&#8221; asserting that there was &#8220;a war on America, a war on God and a war on all believers.&#8221;</p>
<p>As I have written before, this severely warped sense of persecution can be attributed to two chief causes. <strong>First, it may be a political strategy&#8211;paint yourself as oppressed, and people will give you more of what you want. Or second, it could be an earnest though completely wrong belief, stemming from the presumption that Christianity naturally deserves to be dominant instead of equal to other belief systems, and therefore any expression of equality of belief among Americans would be interpreted as an &#8220;attack&#8221; on Christians.</strong></p>
<p>Now, you might say that these are the loony fringe&#8211;after all, they did ask Tom DeLay to speak. But if they are a fringe, they are a successfully vocal one; you have heard their point of view far more often than you hear the other side. They get tons of sympathetic or at least respectful media coverage, and they make up the Republican base and as such receive far more attention and action in today&#8217;s government than is proportional to their actual constituency.&#8221;</p>
<p>There&#8217;s more to this article, but it&#8217;s a very interesting and truthful read.</p>
<p>Of course, the people that fall for the &#8220;war on christians&#8221; line will be unable to appreciate the logic and truth this article is based upon.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=508768', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I-RIGHT-I</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/16/shep-smith-embarrassed-by-oreillys-war-on-easter/comment-page-1/#comment-508721</link>
		<dc:creator>I-RIGHT-I</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 16:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/16/shep-smith-embarrassed-by-oreillys-war-on-easter/#comment-508721</guid>
		<description>For the record, â€œRIGHTâ€, the Gospel of Judas is no less valid than the other Gospels such as those of Thomas, Peter, Mary, Philip, the Ebionites, the Egyptians, the Hebrews or the Nazoreans or even the Infancy Gospels of James or Thomas (among a number of others).

Comment by JosephW 

&lt;b&gt;Yes no less valid is right. No more valid is even closer. What you fail to mention is that all those fakes by heretics and other assorted losers have been formally and reliably discredited by early and modern day historians and biblical scholars. Those writings are no different than the fabulously idiotic book &quot;The Da Vinci Code&quot; that is so popular with losers like you right now. It&#039;s all fantasy dreamed up to entertain those of you who are looking for a cheap thrill and anything that will help you forget that YOU are ultimately responsible for your own eternal condition.  

The same kind of loser that reads that crap and believes it is credible is the same kind of loser that says Bush=Hitler, No Blood for Oil and George new about 9-11.  Here dumbass, watch this....&lt;/b&gt;

http://luckydawgnews.com/911conspiracybs.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the record, â€œRIGHTâ€, the Gospel of Judas is no less valid than the other Gospels such as those of Thomas, Peter, Mary, Philip, the Ebionites, the Egyptians, the Hebrews or the Nazoreans or even the Infancy Gospels of James or Thomas (among a number of others).</p>
<p>Comment by JosephW </p>
<p><b>Yes no less valid is right. No more valid is even closer. What you fail to mention is that all those fakes by heretics and other assorted losers have been formally and reliably discredited by early and modern day historians and biblical scholars. Those writings are no different than the fabulously idiotic book &#8220;The Da Vinci Code&#8221; that is so popular with losers like you right now. It&#8217;s all fantasy dreamed up to entertain those of you who are looking for a cheap thrill and anything that will help you forget that YOU are ultimately responsible for your own eternal condition.  </p>
<p>The same kind of loser that reads that crap and believes it is credible is the same kind of loser that says Bush=Hitler, No Blood for Oil and George new about 9-11.  Here dumbass, watch this&#8230;.</b></p>
<p><a href="http://luckydawgnews.com/911conspiracybs.html" rel="nofollow">http://luckydawgnews.com/911conspiracybs.html</a><a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=508721', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeb</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/16/shep-smith-embarrassed-by-oreillys-war-on-easter/comment-page-1/#comment-508694</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 15:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/16/shep-smith-embarrassed-by-oreillys-war-on-easter/#comment-508694</guid>
		<description>Man, the media, especially FOX and the NYT for some reason, just &lt;em&gt;love&lt;/em&gt; to talk about themselves. Think about it. How many minutes of precious newstime and column inches in the &quot;news of record&quot; is spent on solipsistic analysis of the press? All the Judith Miller stuff, the endless comments about the &quot;nefarious MSM&quot;, the liberal media backlash and assorted other BS is just monumental. People should be getting reports out of the Congo. Out of climatologists--not this insane naval-gazing that passes for news nowadays. I don&#039;t need to know the names of reporters, nevermind newscasters--I need information, facts, stories about people other than the guy down the hall in the pressroom. It&#039;s a sick joke that I know more about Gannon/Guckert then I do about what the hell is happening with the Lord&#039;s Resistence Army.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, the media, especially FOX and the NYT for some reason, just <em>love</em> to talk about themselves. Think about it. How many minutes of precious newstime and column inches in the &#8220;news of record&#8221; is spent on solipsistic analysis of the press? All the Judith Miller stuff, the endless comments about the &#8220;nefarious MSM&#8221;, the liberal media backlash and assorted other BS is just monumental. People should be getting reports out of the Congo. Out of climatologists&#8211;not this insane naval-gazing that passes for news nowadays. I don&#8217;t need to know the names of reporters, nevermind newscasters&#8211;I need information, facts, stories about people other than the guy down the hall in the pressroom. It&#8217;s a sick joke that I know more about Gannon/Guckert then I do about what the hell is happening with the Lord&#8217;s Resistence Army.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=508694', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mtlouie</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/16/shep-smith-embarrassed-by-oreillys-war-on-easter/comment-page-1/#comment-508690</link>
		<dc:creator>mtlouie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 15:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/16/shep-smith-embarrassed-by-oreillys-war-on-easter/#comment-508690</guid>
		<description>PBG
you said: &quot;Christian Church/ No such entity exists.&quot;

It exists, it&#039;s just an oxymoron.  

I-Right-I
I spent ten years in the far right-wing and I can tell you because of your hate-filled writing and because of the fact that I KNOW, you are miserable.  You don&#039;t have to be.  Turn off the news.  Think good thoughts.  It is very hard to do in the beginning.  You are addicted to hate.  That&#039;s what &quot;they&quot; want.  Stop it today.  Love yourself first, then you can learn to love others. And to everyone else: you have to understand these people.  They are, to the last man/woman, miserable.  They don&#039;t believe what they say, but they don&#039;t have the courage to step out.  Please be kind to them.  Using their own words of hate only encourages them.  It feeds them.  And I mean this down to the administration and everyone that follows them.  We won&#039;t win by using hate.  As hard as it is, wish them peace and love.  By using any form of negativity it only feeds the monster.  Love and peace is the ONLY way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PBG<br />
you said: &#8220;Christian Church/ No such entity exists.&#8221;</p>
<p>It exists, it&#8217;s just an oxymoron.  </p>
<p>I-Right-I<br />
I spent ten years in the far right-wing and I can tell you because of your hate-filled writing and because of the fact that I KNOW, you are miserable.  You don&#8217;t have to be.  Turn off the news.  Think good thoughts.  It is very hard to do in the beginning.  You are addicted to hate.  That&#8217;s what &#8220;they&#8221; want.  Stop it today.  Love yourself first, then you can learn to love others. And to everyone else: you have to understand these people.  They are, to the last man/woman, miserable.  They don&#8217;t believe what they say, but they don&#8217;t have the courage to step out.  Please be kind to them.  Using their own words of hate only encourages them.  It feeds them.  And I mean this down to the administration and everyone that follows them.  We won&#8217;t win by using hate.  As hard as it is, wish them peace and love.  By using any form of negativity it only feeds the monster.  Love and peace is the ONLY way.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=508690', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: big dave from queens</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/16/shep-smith-embarrassed-by-oreillys-war-on-easter/comment-page-1/#comment-508675</link>
		<dc:creator>big dave from queens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 15:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/16/shep-smith-embarrassed-by-oreillys-war-on-easter/#comment-508675</guid>
		<description>Somewhere inside of Shephard Smith is a human being who realizes that the company he works for is dishonest, evil, and unAmerican.  Somwhere inside of Shephard Smith is a human being who realizes that the philosophy of RW conservatism is void of conscience, subhuman, and contrary to the values of the human spirit.  Somewhere inside of Shephard Smith is a human being who realizes that FOX hosts like Bill O&#039;Reilly are Hitler/Stalin want to bes who desire the elimination of billions of people who think differently from them.  Somewhere inside of Shephard Smith is a human being who realizes that RW conservatism is simply a philosophy predicated on social Taliban values and economic corporatism designed to use govt to enrich a few and steal from the many.

That human being inside of Shephard showed up for a few days when he learned firsthand that his network was lying about its coverage of Hurricane Katrina.  That human being may make cameo appearances from time to time but until Shephard can eradicate the demons and forego the money he&#039;s taking in place of having a soul, the human being inside Shephard Smith will still only make cameo appearances.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somewhere inside of Shephard Smith is a human being who realizes that the company he works for is dishonest, evil, and unAmerican.  Somwhere inside of Shephard Smith is a human being who realizes that the philosophy of RW conservatism is void of conscience, subhuman, and contrary to the values of the human spirit.  Somewhere inside of Shephard Smith is a human being who realizes that FOX hosts like Bill O&#8217;Reilly are Hitler/Stalin want to bes who desire the elimination of billions of people who think differently from them.  Somewhere inside of Shephard Smith is a human being who realizes that RW conservatism is simply a philosophy predicated on social Taliban values and economic corporatism designed to use govt to enrich a few and steal from the many.</p>
<p>That human being inside of Shephard showed up for a few days when he learned firsthand that his network was lying about its coverage of Hurricane Katrina.  That human being may make cameo appearances from time to time but until Shephard can eradicate the demons and forego the money he&#8217;s taking in place of having a soul, the human being inside Shephard Smith will still only make cameo appearances.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=508675', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I-RIGHT-I</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/16/shep-smith-embarrassed-by-oreillys-war-on-easter/comment-page-1/#comment-508632</link>
		<dc:creator>I-RIGHT-I</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 14:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/16/shep-smith-embarrassed-by-oreillys-war-on-easter/#comment-508632</guid>
		<description>Or perhaps you mean that we are simply not mindless enough to accept it unthinkingly. 

Comment by SuperEdo 

No, I was suggesting you are mindless enough to dismiss it without reading and thinking first. The guy is a brilliant writer and his site is full of gems like this one. What makes him particularly interesting is the fact that in the 60s and 70s he was an insider in the flowering Filthy Left. I guess he grew up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or perhaps you mean that we are simply not mindless enough to accept it unthinkingly. </p>
<p>Comment by SuperEdo </p>
<p>No, I was suggesting you are mindless enough to dismiss it without reading and thinking first. The guy is a brilliant writer and his site is full of gems like this one. What makes him particularly interesting is the fact that in the 60s and 70s he was an insider in the flowering Filthy Left. I guess he grew up.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=508632', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JosephW</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/16/shep-smith-embarrassed-by-oreillys-war-on-easter/comment-page-1/#comment-508629</link>
		<dc:creator>JosephW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 14:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/16/shep-smith-embarrassed-by-oreillys-war-on-easter/#comment-508629</guid>
		<description>Perhaps if the wrong-minded &quot;I-RIGHT-I&quot; spent a bit more time investigating the realities of the dozens of writings by early Christians that were deemed unacceptable by a small group of self-important &quot;leaders&quot; of the Faith and a bit less time regurgitating the garbage spewed by ignorant lunatics who seek to impose a singular dogmatic view of Christianity, he might gain some real insight into the Gospel of Judas in terms of Church history.
For the record, &quot;RIGHT&quot;, the Gospel of Judas is no less valid than the other Gospels such as those of Thomas, Peter, Mary, Philip, the Ebionites, the Egyptians, the Hebrews or the Nazoreans or even the Infancy Gospels of James or Thomas (among a number of others).  The only difference between all of these and the better-known Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John is that the Church &quot;leaders&quot; chose to make these last four part of Church canon; however, canonical status alone does not make these Gospels any more or less believable than those deemed non-canonical.  The vast majority of all the non-canon works present tales that offer insight into how the various Christian communities of the 1st and 2nd centuries venerated (and even kept human) the Christ, in ways that would make His life and teachings more understandable to the local believers.  By the early 4th century, though, The Church decided that It should be the sole arbiter of how Christ&#039;s life and teachings could be presented to the world.

http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps if the wrong-minded &#8220;I-RIGHT-I&#8221; spent a bit more time investigating the realities of the dozens of writings by early Christians that were deemed unacceptable by a small group of self-important &#8220;leaders&#8221; of the Faith and a bit less time regurgitating the garbage spewed by ignorant lunatics who seek to impose a singular dogmatic view of Christianity, he might gain some real insight into the Gospel of Judas in terms of Church history.<br />
For the record, &#8220;RIGHT&#8221;, the Gospel of Judas is no less valid than the other Gospels such as those of Thomas, Peter, Mary, Philip, the Ebionites, the Egyptians, the Hebrews or the Nazoreans or even the Infancy Gospels of James or Thomas (among a number of others).  The only difference between all of these and the better-known Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John is that the Church &#8220;leaders&#8221; chose to make these last four part of Church canon; however, canonical status alone does not make these Gospels any more or less believable than those deemed non-canonical.  The vast majority of all the non-canon works present tales that offer insight into how the various Christian communities of the 1st and 2nd centuries venerated (and even kept human) the Christ, in ways that would make His life and teachings more understandable to the local believers.  By the early 4th century, though, The Church decided that It should be the sole arbiter of how Christ&#8217;s life and teachings could be presented to the world.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/</a><a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=508629', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snarkley</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/16/shep-smith-embarrassed-by-oreillys-war-on-easter/comment-page-1/#comment-508589</link>
		<dc:creator>Snarkley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 13:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/16/shep-smith-embarrassed-by-oreillys-war-on-easter/#comment-508589</guid>
		<description>That da lord is a comin&#039; or is here now is text book cult stategy. The embedded message is that its members need not worry about their economic plight since the presence of the lord makes it a whole new ballgame. Therefore, why not give what little you have to the cult leader(lord) who knows how to prepare the way. hallelua(sp?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That da lord is a comin&#8217; or is here now is text book cult stategy. The embedded message is that its members need not worry about their economic plight since the presence of the lord makes it a whole new ballgame. Therefore, why not give what little you have to the cult leader(lord) who knows how to prepare the way. hallelua(sp?)<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=508589', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cyra Brown</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/16/shep-smith-embarrassed-by-oreillys-war-on-easter/comment-page-1/#comment-508545</link>
		<dc:creator>Cyra Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 09:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/16/shep-smith-embarrassed-by-oreillys-war-on-easter/#comment-508545</guid>
		<description>Shep had better look out! Bill will be &quot;siccing&quot; his &#039;Fox Security&#039; goon squad on him. He knows where he works...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shep had better look out! Bill will be &#8220;siccing&#8221; his &#8216;Fox Security&#8217; goon squad on him. He knows where he works&#8230;<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=508545', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
