Case in point, Shuster said, “…we’ve known for months that in the Scooter Libby indictment when they refer to Official A, Official A is Karl Rove…prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald when he designates somebody as Official A in an indictment, that person eventually does get indicted themselves.”

You rephrased Shuster, “Look, Rove hasn’t been indicted, even though Shuster said he would be on Friday….The only one making up stuff is Think Progress and David Shuster…This goes on and on and on. One lie after the other…”

Again, Shuster said “”that person eventually does get indicted”

You said Shuster said “Rove hasn’t been indicted, even though Shuster said he would be on Friday”

Your posts do not indicate the position of a moderate, but of an apologist for the Bush regime. If you do indeed dogmatically accept the current Administration’s view of the truth as gospel as your posts indicate, then say so.

Meanwhile, as far as Rove goes, the jury’s still out.

That’s what happens when you insulate your mind with Yes Men and only people who think the same jibberish as you do. I’m not defending Bush, I am telling you morons that you are all being lied to and suckered by a bunch of liars. I’m trying to wake you up to the truth. Look, Rove hasn’t been indicted, even though Shuster said he would be on Friday. This is the same thing we heard months ago, where all the left-wing commentators were talking about Rove going down, then it never happened. It’s all wishful partisan thinking.

If you don’t believe I live in Norway, just have an admin check my IP.

The only one making up stuff is Think Progress and David Shuster.

Now I let you get back to your regularly scheduled program of made up stories and loose innuendo meant to string you along on your pathetic existence. Rove is gonna be indicted!(Oh wait… that didn’t turn out… what to do…. ah ha!) Rice is going to be indicted! (Hmm… let’s see… if this doesn’t turn out true, we’ll need to line another item up so the sheep don’t notice that things are falling apart… hmmm)

This goes on and on and on. One lie after the other, and you never notice that they never materialize because you are too addicted to the newest fabricated story.

Seixon doesn’t deserve all this attention. His posts are as useless, as evidenced by his attacks on Wilson and Shuster. He offers no evidence to support his claims, but demands the rest of us do so

I got all the evidence you want baby, just tell me what you want. The thing is – you don’t want to see it because you don’t want your fragile worldview to be exposed to the truth. Shuster is a serial liar, and so is Wilson. Or do you think the Times and the Post wrote those stories about him debunking the Niger forgeries without his help?

He attacks Wilson by calling him a liar, yet fails to acknowledge the lies of this adminstration

So I have to talk about a lie Bush made every time I talk about anyone else lying? Boy, that would get a bit tiring.

case in point the claim that the trailers found in Iraq were for bio-weapons development. A claim that was clearly false and, as recent reports are suggesting, Bush knew they were false when he made them.

Heh, yeah, except the WaPo has backpedaled from their story because I and others exposed them for the frauds they are. Keyword: suggesting.

BUT, more importantly, Seixon is missing the point – the leaking of Plame’s name was a morally bankrupt act, even if Fitz can’t make a criminal case against the leaker.

It was morally bankrupt, even though the leaker didn’t even know that they were leaking classified information? Mmmm. OK?

Seixon rages against Wilson in his claim that Wilson lied for political purposes, and yet justifies the leaking of Plame’s name for political purposes by saying those involved were angry and wanted retaliation [78]. Hyprocracy?…absolutely.

I justified it? No, I told you the truth about what happened. The State Department, Armitage, leaked her name because he was fed up with Wilson’s constant lying to the media, and he wanted to tell the truth about how Wilson got the mission, and why he was sent on it, and that he was never briefed about the mission as Wilson claimed through his anonymous leaks. Wilson lied, Armitage set him straight. If Armitage didn’t know he was leaking classified information about Plame, then what is the moral problem? I don’t know whether Armitage knew or not, but the INR memo seems to indicate that they didn’t know that Plame was NOC.

Perhaps there is some sort of twisted justice in the knowledge that Seixon will suffer the consequences of this adminstration, just like the rest of us if we are unable to stop Bush and Co. Please ignore him – he brings no intellectual value to this conversation.

Yes, just ignore me. The true words of a thinking person. Ignore all dissent. Good, the evil plan by Bush is working. A new breed of ignorant and fascist ideals are growing all over the country. Dissent is frowned upon, excellent! Oh wait, I thought you guys were against that?

#80 Glenn:

The fact that the Bush Administration retracted the infamous 16 words proves that Wilson was right.

Ehm, no. Did you even listen to Tenet? The reason they retracted it was because they cited British intelligence, something they shouldn’t have done in a presidential speech.

Regardless of whether Iraq was “seeking” uranium is irrelevant.

Eh, what? Sorry man, but the entire intelligence community disagrees with you here. If Iraq was seeking uranium, there is only one reason why that would be – for a nuclear program. I wouldn’t say that is “irrelevant”.

Even if they did get yellow cake, it would take years to process in to plutonium to create a nuclear bomb. Eh. Did you fail science class? They would enrich the uranium. You can’t make plutonium out of uranium. LOL.

This hardly supports the “eminent threat” that we were sold for invading a country that never attacked us. Cheney, Bush & Co. (and I do mean Company) were and are still trying to hide their true intentions for controlling the Lightest and Sweetest crude oil reserves in the world.

Eminent? You mean “imminent”. Why are there so many illiterate people on Think Progress? I thought the progressives were supposed to be smart, and the conservatives dumb. The only person who stated that Iraq was an “imminent threat” was none other than Democratic senator Rockefeller. Ooooops.

You, Seixon, are obviously a republican shill.

Yeah, obviously. Anyone who challenges anything Think Progress people say has to be an evil Republican. I could never ever be a moderate Independent fed up with the brain-dead liberal Bush Derangement Syndrome fad. Nope, never.

Even your name Seixon, with its subconscious reference to the word “Sex“, is pure Karl Rove.

Actually, it’s a clever spelling of a japanese word meaning survival, but believe what you want.

We are on to you pal. I sure hope the neo-cons are paying you a lot of money to spout your drivel, because we are not impressed.

Oh yes. They are paying for my student housing here in Norway, and my BMW is waiting outside to take me to Karl Rove’s dark lair. Oh wait, I walk everywhere I go. How… progressive.

Glenn, the humble

More like Glenn the brainwashed, but I defer.

Stay alert. If they steal another election, there will be no retribution against Rove and the other evil idiots.

Steal the P!

The Missing P Project

http://www.geocities.com/themissingPproject