Comments on: Though Sen. Pat Roberts (R-KS)

By: Wally

Wally — Wed, 26 Apr 2006 13:26:20 +0000

This explains why Roberts is so eager to do the White House’s bidding, maybe. If he gets out of line they can always say, “About that intelligence blunder we never prosecuted you for…the DOJ has been kind of bored lately, and all it would take is one phone call… Good Pat! Delay that report another year! Here’s a biscuit!”

By: Zimzone

Zimzone — Wed, 26 Apr 2006 12:24:51 +0000

You’re not in Kansan anymore, Mr. Roberts.
Take Toto back to Texas where he belongs.
While you’re at it, take the Tin Man & the
Scarecrow with you…we looked behind the
curtain & found KKKarl pulling the strings.
Tony Snow is a lying piece of SHIT!

By: the fly-man

the fly-man — Wed, 26 Apr 2006 11:16:28 +0000

First Darin, based on your points I believe that is why Pat Roberts will be the next VP. Secomd, sexion of course it makes sense that you start attacking Murray Waas.Your unsubstaintiated claims are easy for you to make they’re the based on the reasoning you complain others on this blog use to challenge your side of the argument.i though you were all about facts. What’s up my brother. You can do better than your feebly attack in #9. And seriously so what if the Liberal blogs are dazzled? If the White House hadn’t used the nuclear option on Valerie Plame to counter Joe Wilson maybe the game would be different, but credibility is in the eye of the beholder and yes the tactics used by either side are debatable but using anonymous intelligent soureces isnot just the sole franchise of the Right.You can no more call up the CIA and comfirm anything Bob Novak says any more than with Mr. Waas. I think you have Blog envy.

By: tangledwing » Sen. Pat Roberts R-KS -conservative leaks sre OK, How far can you drive on a bushel of corn?

Wed, 26 Apr 2006 08:00:55 +0000

[...] Though Sen. Pat Roberts (R-KS) “Roberts himself was involved in disclosing sensitive intelligence information [in 2003] that, according to four former senior intelligence officers, impaired efforts to capture Saddam Hussein and potentially threatened the lives of Iraqis who were spying for the United States,” Murray Waas writes. Roberts’ case is an example of “how rank and file intelligence professionals now have much to fear from legitimate and even inadvertent contacts with journalists, while senior executive branch officials and members of Congress are almost never held accountable when they seriously breach national security through leaks of information.” [...]

By: katy

katy — Wed, 26 Apr 2006 04:45:23 +0000

uhhh … Need to deflect attention… Dig up old news story. Pretend it is new and relevant…The name is right-wing-nuttia…

By: subliminal man

subliminal man — Wed, 26 Apr 2006 04:39:46 +0000

PAT ROBERTS sucks IS A dickhead MAN OF questionable INTEGRITY.

By: Hardy Haberman

Hardy Haberman — Wed, 26 Apr 2006 03:57:51 +0000

Sometimes people try to describe anything that is more that one minute old as old news. Well the truth is that in our “that was so twenty minutes ago” world the right wing depends on the short attention span of the public. We are bombarded with fear and irrelevant stories of the latest tourist kidnapping in the Bahamas or another Lacy Peterson story to distract us from the real stories that sometimes take time to fully reveal themselves.

The right wing would have Americans believe that if something happened to fly “under the radar” then it doesn’t matter. The truth always matters, and hypocrisy sometimes takes time to expose itself.

By: SEIXON

SEIXON — Wed, 26 Apr 2006 03:28:11 +0000

Waas Strikes Back…

Need to deflect attention from Democrats. Dig up old news story. Pretend it is new and relevant. Get a bunch of anonymous sockpuppets, errr, intelligence officials to source a story. Dazzle the liberal blogs. The name is Murray Waas….

By: Innocent Bystander

Innocent Bystander — Wed, 26 Apr 2006 03:01:21 +0000

I wonder if “Mary McCarthy is a Traitor” will update their screen name to someone who really is helping to kill our democracy? nah.

By: Desi

Desi — Wed, 26 Apr 2006 02:28:46 +0000

Ha, I beat y’all out by 10 minutes on this story. You sure are making it difficult to be the first to post sumpin’! ;)

By: wisedup

wisedup — Wed, 26 Apr 2006 02:16:32 +0000

Pat Roberts is a sick old man,lier,leaker and I hope he is forced to wear ‘depends’.

By: beep52

beep52 — Wed, 26 Apr 2006 02:02:04 +0000

Maybe now the Dems will call Roberts out on “phase II?” After all, it doesn’t even require courage now that we’re past the tipping point.

By: Goebbels

Goebbels — Wed, 26 Apr 2006 01:56:37 +0000

Arrest the treasonous bastard and throw him into Guantanamo.

By: Marie

Marie — Wed, 26 Apr 2006 01:24:10 +0000

It’s their football and they make the rules to suit them.
Their farts don’t stink.
Do as I say not as I do.
They are rotten with power; hypocrites all.
Roberts, who has stymied the Phase II of the investigation into the pre-war Intel, putting off any possible substantive conclusion until so far into the future, Bush will be out of office.
Did someone say Cheney should take an early retirement and Roberts be set in his place? He already knows how to leak information.

By: Darin

Darin — Wed, 26 Apr 2006 01:12:57 +0000

The hypocrisy and incompetence continues from Republicans. I guarnantee you nothing happens to old Pat for this stupidity that very well could have cost lives.

By: EL CHUPACABRA

EL CHUPACABRA — Wed, 26 Apr 2006 01:05:26 +0000

I’m from Kansas and sometimes it is hard to
admit it. I left there at 18 and never have
regretted it. I have always wondered: What is
wrong with Kansas? Some really wierd people.