This article sounds well, but how everything is related together?

One to the right, and one to the left. When dealing with milled

Comment by Clif — April 27, 2006

The legal waiver (aka pardon) was given to John Podesta AFTER he committed the crime. Dumbass.

Comment by sugar magnolia — April 27, 2006 @ 3:10 pm

No idiot a legal waiver is a BEFORE the fact item if it is after it is a pardon…a waiver waves the law or regulation a pardon forgives the breach of law or regulation, you may not pull your head out of your ass it helps in breathing that is required to get oxygen to the brain that helps in fueling the cells required in thought

”She is lovely,yes she’s sly”….

“According to a top secret document obtained from the National Security Council, the Clinton secret project to bug America started in late 1992.”

and can you speak for the erroneous suggestion there that clinton, who wasn’t even in office in 1992, would’ve had the authority to start any secret projects? doesn’t that blaring error speak volumes as to the illegitimacy of the source? you can at least agree that worldnetdaily is a decidedly partisan source, and therefore not necessarily reliable?

or are you a blind partisan hack?

but i agree, this subject has now been talked in circles. sorry if it seemed at any point that what i had to say was lacking respect; that was certainly not my intent.

Comment by katy — April 27, 2006 @ 2:25 pm

Exactly.

Comment by Clif — April 27, 2006

The legal waiver (aka pardon) was given to John Podesta AFTER he committed the crime. Dumbass.

oops…there i go again… sheesh…

Comment by katy — April 27, 2006 @ 1:58 pm

It’s that patronizing tone right there that I detest. Like you have some right to talk down to me. And that I am ungrateful for not appreciating it, so then you can insult me or point out my flaws. Can’t stand that. In fact, so much so, that I’d just rather you keep your thoughts about what I have to say to yourself. I don’t want your advice when it comes delivered in this manner. After all, I think that was some of your recent unsolicited ‘advice’.

and guru – not at all sure what YOUR thing is, but i sign posts as katy and that’s who i am…

good to see you’ve found some words of your own tho…

I think better to just avoid that one. :)

Wayne, I’ve not suggested half of the things I’m being accused of suggesting. I’m very disappointed in some people who care more about being right than free speech.

I’m done discussing this issue with anyone. Let them get their posts deleted and eventually banned. And I’m done discussing any issue with others. Without respect, I’m simply not interested in the conversation.

I just wanted to say this about Progressaurus Rex’s pleas about the 9-11 stuff. I read what you said about conspiracy theories and such and I respect that view. All we’re saying is this: If you begin with the premise that neither the President nor the Vice President had any foreknowledge whatsoever about anything that was going to happen that day (even the general idea that we would be attacked), then many of their actions and inactions don’t make any sense and they raise a lot of questions. If, however, you remove that premise and allow even just the possibility that they knew that some kind of attack on us was going to happen that day (even if they didn;t know any specifics), then a lot of the inconsistencies begin to make sense. And there are a great many areas where the “official” account of things just plain contradicts what really happened. And even if you’re willing to dismiss all of that, ask yourself this: Why did the President and Vice President fight so hard to stop anyone from investigating what happened that day? And when they were finally cornered and had to give their accounts, why did they refuse to testify under oath or even separately? It doesn’t make sense.

Comment by Progressaurus Rex — April 26, 2006 @ 11:56 pm

It has nothing to do with Santo. He’s a nut. She should take it personally. She’s been lecturing me for weeks. I am a grown woman with a difference perspective. Doesn’t make me wrong and her right, just different. And she’s the only one doing it. I don’t like it and want her to stop. Hence the terse retort this time, as my prior even-tempered ones have had no impact. I think she hears me now.

Comment by Progressaurus Rex — April 26, 2006 @ 10:41 pm

And I could say exactly the same thing in return. No one knows. I just have the perspective of experience on building design that many others don’t or don’t understand. And from that perspective, I don’t see a conspiracy. Just neglegence. Huge differemce.

I am exactly what I post. a former military officer who can see throught the BULL put out by this out of control Administration, and after my older daughter was deployed I quit being silent…happily she came home last fall and is OK but other peoples children had to take her place so I will not be silent any more.