Comments on: VIDEO: O’Reilly Attacks Newspaper Editor Who Died Four Years Ago http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/27/oreilly-attacks-dead-man/ Fri, 27 Nov 2009 02:53:46 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: Intelligent Discontent » Blog Archive » Bill O’Reilly Is Definitely the Worst Person in the World http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/27/oreilly-attacks-dead-man/comment-page-2/#comment-534479 Intelligent Discontent » Blog Archive » Bill O’Reilly Is Definitely the Worst Person in the World Wed, 03 May 2006 05:21:42 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/27/oreilly-attacks-dead-man/#comment-534479 [...] Ann Coulter, you have been defeated. [...] [...] Ann Coulter, you have been defeated. [...]

]]> By: JPark http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/27/oreilly-attacks-dead-man/comment-page-2/#comment-527919 JPark Fri, 28 Apr 2006 21:45:38 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/27/oreilly-attacks-dead-man/#comment-527919 Um, #57, no, it certainly didn't answer my question. At least I don't think it did. I could have the crazy cat lady next door translate. Just give me a few minutes. Um, #57, no, it certainly didn’t answer my question. At least I don’t think it did. I could have the crazy cat lady next door translate. Just give me a few minutes.

]]> By: Wayne A. Schneider http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/27/oreilly-attacks-dead-man/comment-page-2/#comment-527600 Wayne A. Schneider Fri, 28 Apr 2006 18:59:47 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/27/oreilly-attacks-dead-man/#comment-527600 #69 Big Al, According to www.mediamatters,org, you can e-mail Bill O'Reilly directly at oreilly@foxnews.com. You don't have to sign up for anything or pay him a dime for the "privilege." #69 Big Al,

According to http://www.mediamatters,org, you can e-mail Bill O’Reilly directly at oreilly@foxnews.com. You don’t have to sign up for anything or pay him a dime for the “privilege.”

]]> By: Bob Lynn http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/27/oreilly-attacks-dead-man/comment-page-2/#comment-527325 Bob Lynn Fri, 28 Apr 2006 16:49:01 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/27/oreilly-attacks-dead-man/#comment-527325 Weekend at Billys Weekend at Billys

]]> By: GURU^ http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/27/oreilly-attacks-dead-man/comment-page-2/#comment-527302 GURU^ Fri, 28 Apr 2006 16:38:15 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/27/oreilly-attacks-dead-man/#comment-527302 # 62 SANTO katy:Would you please stop SHOUTING! Si Senorita? # 62 SANTO katy:Would you please stop SHOUTING! Si Senorita?

]]> By: Big Al http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/27/oreilly-attacks-dead-man/comment-page-2/#comment-527208 Big Al Fri, 28 Apr 2006 15:54:15 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/27/oreilly-attacks-dead-man/#comment-527208 I just checked out Bill O'Reilly's web site and found out you have to pay to be a premium member and only premium members can email Bill. I was going to email Bill and tell him that the Syracuse Post-Standard should get a Pullitzer Prize for their reporting and editorials (or should I have said a Peabody) I don't think it is worth paying for the privilege of emailing Bill, so I don't get to email him and I don't get one of his special lapel pins to wear. I just checked out Bill O’Reilly’s web site and found out you have to pay to be a premium member and only premium members can email Bill. I was going to email Bill and tell him that the Syracuse Post-Standard should get a Pullitzer Prize for their reporting and editorials (or should I have said a Peabody) I don’t think it is worth paying for the privilege of emailing Bill, so I don’t get to email him and I don’t get one of his special lapel pins to wear.

]]> By: AJ http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/27/oreilly-attacks-dead-man/comment-page-2/#comment-527164 AJ Fri, 28 Apr 2006 15:18:26 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/27/oreilly-attacks-dead-man/#comment-527164 So 2 million people watch O'Reilly every night. Big deal. That means 298 million Americans don't turn him on. And if you take the 2004 election numbers and assume unrealistically that all 2 million of those watching O'Reilly voted, then 118 million people who vote don't watch his lies. If you think O'Reilly talks about issues and isn't as hate-filled as those you refer to as liberals who attack others, well, then I feel bad for you and your delusion. So 2 million people watch O’Reilly every night. Big deal. That means 298 million Americans don’t turn him on. And if you take the 2004 election numbers and assume unrealistically that all 2 million of those watching O’Reilly voted, then 118 million people who vote don’t watch his lies. If you think O’Reilly talks about issues and isn’t as hate-filled as those you refer to as liberals who attack others, well, then I feel bad for you and your delusion.

]]> By: Glenn Becker http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/27/oreilly-attacks-dead-man/comment-page-2/#comment-527159 Glenn Becker Fri, 28 Apr 2006 15:16:46 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/27/oreilly-attacks-dead-man/#comment-527159 "Have you no shame, Mr. O’Reilly?" Shame won't pay the sex-worker bills like raking muck does! There isn't a neo-con blowhard -- the Presidunce included -- who has the slightest inkling what shame is. Or if they do know, they don't care. As long as they are famous now, powerful now, caved to now, the rest is ... nothing. “Have you no shame, Mr. O’Reilly?”

Shame won’t pay the sex-worker bills like raking muck does!

There isn’t a neo-con blowhard — the Presidunce included — who has the slightest inkling what shame is. Or if they do know, they don’t care. As long as they are famous now, powerful now, caved to now, the rest is … nothing.

]]> By: Curveball http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/27/oreilly-attacks-dead-man/comment-page-2/#comment-527088 Curveball Fri, 28 Apr 2006 14:34:01 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/27/oreilly-attacks-dead-man/#comment-527088 #65 - I'd say it's pretty bad when a self-described "newsman" mistakenly puts the image of a dead man on the screen and bashes him. And the fact that he's even bashing the two LIVING Syracuse reporters is ridiculous on its own. Plus, it's fun to poke fun of O'Reilly's idiocy. Don't worry, I'm sure iTP and others will continue to point out his most egregious moments. #65 – I’d say it’s pretty bad when a self-described “newsman” mistakenly puts the image of a dead man on the screen and bashes him. And the fact that he’s even bashing the two LIVING Syracuse reporters is ridiculous on its own. Plus, it’s fun to poke fun of O’Reilly’s idiocy. Don’t worry, I’m sure iTP and others will continue to point out his most egregious moments.

]]> By: pseudolus http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/27/oreilly-attacks-dead-man/comment-page-2/#comment-527050 pseudolus Fri, 28 Apr 2006 14:15:15 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/27/oreilly-attacks-dead-man/#comment-527050 OK. This one had me until the end. "Stephen A. Rogers" and not "Stephen Rogers"? OY! So, it's not the fact that BO is attacking someone because he has perceived them as enemy figures out of proportion to their real threat, or that he uses his HUGE bully pulpit to stir up citizens to harrass them. No. This is upsetting because some writer/researcher got a father and son with the same name confused? That's never happened before. Oh, the tragedy. Sounds like an easy mistake and some staff need to be spanked. It's embarrassing, but not malicious like so much of BO's other crap. Sorry, this one is much ado about nothing. OK. This one had me until the end. “Stephen A. Rogers” and not “Stephen Rogers”? OY! So, it’s not the fact that BO is attacking someone because he has perceived them as enemy figures out of proportion to their real threat, or that he uses his HUGE bully pulpit to stir up citizens to harrass them. No. This is upsetting because some writer/researcher got a father and son with the same name confused? That’s never happened before. Oh, the tragedy.

Sounds like an easy mistake and some staff need to be spanked. It’s embarrassing, but not malicious like so much of BO’s other crap. Sorry, this one is much ado about nothing.

]]> By: Rob Turner http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/27/oreilly-attacks-dead-man/comment-page-2/#comment-527029 Rob Turner Fri, 28 Apr 2006 14:03:09 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/27/oreilly-attacks-dead-man/#comment-527029 61: If that were true then more people would watch Olbermann on MSNBC. Olbermann, the liberal, has 25% the viewers. He attacks O'Reilly constantly. The advertising dollar tells us that conservative TV sells 4 times better. The reason is that all liberals do is attack and cry. Conservatives talk about real issues that people care about. 61:

If that were true then more people would watch Olbermann on MSNBC. Olbermann, the liberal, has 25% the viewers. He attacks O’Reilly constantly. The advertising dollar tells us that conservative TV sells 4 times better. The reason is that all liberals do is attack and cry. Conservatives talk about real issues that people care about.

]]> By: GURU^ http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/27/oreilly-attacks-dead-man/comment-page-2/#comment-527021 GURU^ Fri, 28 Apr 2006 13:57:31 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/27/oreilly-attacks-dead-man/#comment-527021 # 55 SANTO katy ;I bet you will,I'm scared. You're lucky that I have some things to do this morning,or I'd expose you forthwith.Oh,and learn how to spell. # 55 SANTO katy ;I bet you will,I’m scared.
You’re lucky that I have some things to do this morning,or I’d expose you forthwith.Oh,and learn how to spell.

]]> By: A.J. http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/27/oreilly-attacks-dead-man/comment-page-2/#comment-526960 A.J. Fri, 28 Apr 2006 13:07:14 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/27/oreilly-attacks-dead-man/#comment-526960 <em>He’s not alone. He has 2,000,000 viewers every night that watch him and agree with him. People tune in because they agree with him. Liberals CAN NOT get over that!!!</em> And that has what to do with him attacking a dead guy because they had the audacity to mention his sexual harassment suit? People watch O'Reilly for the same reasons they watch auto accidents and train wrecks. They don't watch because they agree with his hate-filled rhetoric. He’s not alone. He has 2,000,000 viewers every night that watch him and agree with him. People tune in because they agree with him. Liberals CAN NOT get over that!!!

And that has what to do with him attacking a dead guy because they had the audacity to mention his sexual harassment suit? People watch O’Reilly for the same reasons they watch auto accidents and train wrecks. They don’t watch because they agree with his hate-filled rhetoric.

]]> By: Rob Turner http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/27/oreilly-attacks-dead-man/comment-page-2/#comment-526954 Rob Turner Fri, 28 Apr 2006 13:03:21 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/27/oreilly-attacks-dead-man/#comment-526954 It is so funny to watch liberals cry over O'Reilly. He really knows how to tell it straight, expose you, and piss ya'll off. Here is a quote from post: O’Reilly escalated the fight (which he alone is waging) He's not alone. He has 2,000,000 viewers every night that watch him and agree with him. People tune in because they agree with him. Liberals CAN NOT get over that!!! It is so funny to watch liberals cry over O’Reilly. He really knows how to tell it straight, expose you, and piss ya’ll off. Here is a quote from post:

O’Reilly escalated the fight (which he alone is waging)

He’s not alone. He has 2,000,000 viewers every night that watch him and agree with him. People tune in because they agree with him. Liberals CAN NOT get over that!!!

]]> By: topo gigio http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/27/oreilly-attacks-dead-man/comment-page-2/#comment-526940 topo gigio Fri, 28 Apr 2006 12:44:54 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/27/oreilly-attacks-dead-man/#comment-526940 Getting ready for the march/protest on May 1st Santa? Getting ready for the march/protest on May 1st Santa?

]]> By: JPark http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/27/oreilly-attacks-dead-man/comment-page-2/#comment-526921 JPark Fri, 28 Apr 2006 12:19:08 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/27/oreilly-attacks-dead-man/#comment-526921 Santo, was that a threat? Santo, was that a threat?

]]> By: Jay Randal http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/27/oreilly-attacks-dead-man/comment-page-2/#comment-526877 Jay Randal Fri, 28 Apr 2006 10:56:48 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/27/oreilly-attacks-dead-man/#comment-526877 O'Reilly is mentally ill and is a danger to himself and others! It is wrong for FOX News to keep him in a position where he can spew his sick thoughts to the entire world! He must be fired from television ranting and institutionalized for his own good! O’Reilly is mentally ill and is a danger to himself and others! It is wrong for FOX News to keep him in a position where he can spew his sick thoughts to the entire world! He must be fired from television ranting and institutionalized for his own good!

]]> By: Evil Spaniard http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/27/oreilly-attacks-dead-man/comment-page-1/#comment-526850 Evil Spaniard Fri, 28 Apr 2006 10:14:17 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/27/oreilly-attacks-dead-man/#comment-526850 Hmmm... This blog's entry has something ado with the phrase "beating a dead horse"? /sarcasm off Hmmm… This blog’s entry has something ado with the phrase “beating a dead horse”? /sarcasm off

]]> By: Lora http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/27/oreilly-attacks-dead-man/comment-page-1/#comment-526834 Lora Fri, 28 Apr 2006 09:54:34 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/27/oreilly-attacks-dead-man/#comment-526834 Maybe he wants a role in "Ghostbusters #something" Maybe he wants a role in “Ghostbusters #something”

]]> By: Paige http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/27/oreilly-attacks-dead-man/comment-page-1/#comment-526792 Paige Fri, 28 Apr 2006 08:12:28 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/27/oreilly-attacks-dead-man/#comment-526792 Oh, Bill.....you truly make me sad and embarrassed for you. You never cease to out-do yourself. Each time I read or see your latest stunts/antics, it always seems to be funnier than the one before. THIS is truly hysterical. I am sure you'll call the 90 year-old dead man that died 4 years ago a 'COWARD' for not agreeing to appear on your show. OH BILL! You DO amuse me. Oh, Bill…..you truly make me sad and embarrassed for you. You never cease to out-do yourself. Each time I read or see your latest stunts/antics, it always seems to be funnier than the one before.

THIS is truly hysterical. I am sure you’ll call the 90 year-old dead man that died 4 years ago a ‘COWARD’ for not agreeing to appear on your show.

OH BILL! You DO amuse me.

]]>